Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Meiselas this past Monday: The issue with the missing transcript involves the fact that the grand jury rejected the indictment when it had three counts. And according to Lindsay Halligan, she had to go back, print out another document because the grand jury was confused about what it looked... like. And then she brought back a two count indictment, and she said the grand jury then agreed to this two count indictment. That's the part that's missing in the transcript. That's what Judge Currie in the disqualification hearing was referring to. The idea that she may have just presented a document as the grand jury indicting James Comey that they never even saw or they weren't aware of, because that's not captured on the transcript. That goes beyond disbarment. I want to be very careful with my language, because we don't know yet. But if that's what took place, that's criminal. That's literally a criminal act that in normal times would put somebody away for 20 or 30 years in prison...show more

MeidasTouch

1,336,760 subscribers

176,669 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Reporter: This indictment charged against James Comey was never actually presented to the full grand jury. The original indictment that Lindsey Halligan presented was 3 counts. That grand jury felt that there was not enough evidence to charge Comey on one of the counts. Halligan reprinted a new version of the indictment, and instead of re-presenting it to the full grand jury, she just had the foreperson sign it. This is a major procedural mishap because the indictment against him could be seen as invalidated.

Reporter: This indictment charged against James Comey was never actually presented to the full grand jury. The original indictment that Lindsey Halligan presented was 3 counts. That grand jury felt that there was not enough evidence to charge Comey on one of the counts. Halligan reprinted a new version of the indictment, and instead of re-presenting it to the full grand jury, she just had the foreperson sign it. This is a major procedural mishap because the indictment against him could be seen as invalidated.

FactPost

101,273 views • 8 months ago

JOHNSON: The indictment was by a grand jury SORKIN: But my understanding is that the previous prosecutor refused to bring the case because they didn't think it was strong enough to even bring to a grand jury JOHNSON: That's why we have a grand jury KERNEN: *hops in to wrap up interview*

JOHNSON: The indictment was by a grand jury SORKIN: But my understanding is that the previous prosecutor refused to bring the case because they didn't think it was strong enough to even bring to a grand jury JOHNSON: That's why we have a grand jury KERNEN: hops in to wrap up interview

Aaron Rupar

473,924 views • 10 months ago

🚨HOLY CRAP! Karoline Leavitt just WENT OFF as she talked about the White House's response to SPLC being federally indicted: "It was quite SHOCKING to me to learn of the egregious violations of the law the Southern Poverty Law Center was committing." "I think that's a story that should be on the FRONT PAGE of every newspaper in this country because they've obviously been duping their supporters and the American taxpayers for FAR TOO LONG." "It's a criminal organization, CLEARLY, and that's not our DOJ saying that or Todd Blanche saying that." "That's a grand jury indictment saying that." LOCK THE CROOKS UP FOR LIFE LIKE THEY DESERVE TO BE!

🚨HOLY CRAP! Karoline Leavitt just WENT OFF as she talked about the White House's response to SPLC being federally indicted: "It was quite SHOCKING to me to learn of the egregious violations of the law the Southern Poverty Law Center was committing." "I think that's a story that should be on the FRONT PAGE of every newspaper in this country because they've obviously been duping their supporters and the American taxpayers for FAR TOO LONG." "It's a criminal organization, CLEARLY, and that's not our DOJ saying that or Todd Blanche saying that." "That's a grand jury indictment saying that." LOCK THE CROOKS UP FOR LIFE LIKE THEY DESERVE TO BE!

Gunther Eagleman™

53,810 views • 3 months ago

Katelyn Polantz: The judge got the Justice Department to admit the final indictment James Comey now faces... was never shown to the full Grand Jury, and they did not approve it in full. They had voted down indicting Comey because they had been asked to approve three different charges against him.

Katelyn Polantz: The judge got the Justice Department to admit the final indictment James Comey now faces... was never shown to the full Grand Jury, and they did not approve it in full. They had voted down indicting Comey because they had been asked to approve three different charges against him.

Blue Georgia

260,173 views • 8 months ago

🚨MAJOR EXPLOSIVE NEWS!!! The DOJ was given until 5PM ET by Judge Michael Nachmanoff to respond to the BOMBSHELL revelations that interim US Attorney Lindsey Halligan never presented the full grand jury to vote on the final indictment of James Comey. After U.S. Attorney Tyler Lemons cited privilege to not discuss the declination memo written by prosecutors who oversaw the case before Halligan, the judge asked who was holding him back, to which he responded that it's Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. After citing privilege to refuse to answer about the declination memo written by the prosecutors before Halligan, the judge asked the U.S. Attorney Tyler Lemons, who was holding him back, to which Lemons said Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. The judge called Halligan to the stand, where she admitted that on Sept 25, after the jury rejected one of the three counts due to insufficient evidence, rather than revising the document and resubmitting it to the full grand jury for a new vote— which is standard under Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure— She personally rewrote the indictment to remove the count, bypassing the jury. When Halligan took the altered version to a magistrate's courtroom, only the grand jury foreperson and one other juror signed it, treating it as administrative approval. This entire case is likely TOAST.

🚨MAJOR EXPLOSIVE NEWS!!! The DOJ was given until 5PM ET by Judge Michael Nachmanoff to respond to the BOMBSHELL revelations that interim US Attorney Lindsey Halligan never presented the full grand jury to vote on the final indictment of James Comey. After U.S. Attorney Tyler Lemons cited privilege to not discuss the declination memo written by prosecutors who oversaw the case before Halligan, the judge asked who was holding him back, to which he responded that it's Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. After citing privilege to refuse to answer about the declination memo written by the prosecutors before Halligan, the judge asked the U.S. Attorney Tyler Lemons, who was holding him back, to which Lemons said Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. The judge called Halligan to the stand, where she admitted that on Sept 25, after the jury rejected one of the three counts due to insufficient evidence, rather than revising the document and resubmitting it to the full grand jury for a new vote— which is standard under Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure— She personally rewrote the indictment to remove the count, bypassing the jury. When Halligan took the altered version to a magistrate's courtroom, only the grand jury foreperson and one other juror signed it, treating it as administrative approval. This entire case is likely TOAST.

CALL TO ACTIVISM

520,573 views • 8 months ago

🚨 JUST IN: Karoline Leavitt just WENT HARD against leftist NGO Southern Poverty Law Center after being indicted for secretly sending $3 million to white supremacist groups "It's a CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION, clearly, and that's not our DOJ saying that or Todd Blanche saying that. That's a grand jury indictment saying that!" 🔥 "I think that's a story that should be on the front page of every newspaper in this country because they've obviously been duping their supporters and the American taxpayers for far too long." It was FRAUDULENT all along!

🚨 JUST IN: Karoline Leavitt just WENT HARD against leftist NGO Southern Poverty Law Center after being indicted for secretly sending $3 million to white supremacist groups "It's a CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION, clearly, and that's not our DOJ saying that or Todd Blanche saying that. That's a grand jury indictment saying that!" 🔥 "I think that's a story that should be on the front page of every newspaper in this country because they've obviously been duping their supporters and the American taxpayers for far too long." It was FRAUDULENT all along!

Eric Daugherty

27,450 views • 3 months ago

🚨 JUST NOW: AG Todd Blanche confirms that the DOJ's criminal case against James Comey is NOT solely about the "8647" Instagram post alone LOCK HIM UP! "Rest assured that it's not just the Instagram post that leads somebody to get indicted." "The career FBI agents, the career Secret Service agents that investigated this case, didn't just look at the Instagram post and WALK AWAY." "That's why you saw an indictment last week. Not withstanding the fact that it was last May that the post was made." "So I am not permitted to get into the details of what the grand jury heard or found, as you know."

🚨 JUST NOW: AG Todd Blanche confirms that the DOJ's criminal case against James Comey is NOT solely about the "8647" Instagram post alone LOCK HIM UP! "Rest assured that it's not just the Instagram post that leads somebody to get indicted." "The career FBI agents, the career Secret Service agents that investigated this case, didn't just look at the Instagram post and WALK AWAY." "That's why you saw an indictment last week. Not withstanding the fact that it was last May that the post was made." "So I am not permitted to get into the details of what the grand jury heard or found, as you know."

Eric Daugherty

231,641 views • 3 months ago

NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “How do you prove intent, Mr. Blanche, when Mr. Comey himself said he didn't understand that some people would look at that and think about violence?” Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche: “You prove intent like you always prove intent. You prove intent with witnesses, you prove intent with documents, with materials. So again, this is not just about a single Instagram post. This is about a body of evidence that the grand jury collected over the series of about 11 months. That evidence was presented to the grand jury. And it's not the government. It's not the Department of Justice. It's not Todd Blanche that returned an indictment against James Comey. It's the grand jury, part of the judicial process, and that this process has to be allowed to play out in the courts. It's not fair to Mr. Comey, it's certainly not fair to the prosecutors for us to be airing your view or my view of this indictment. It's something that will be presented in court at the time set by the judge.”

NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “How do you prove intent, Mr. Blanche, when Mr. Comey himself said he didn't understand that some people would look at that and think about violence?” Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche: “You prove intent like you always prove intent. You prove intent with witnesses, you prove intent with documents, with materials. So again, this is not just about a single Instagram post. This is about a body of evidence that the grand jury collected over the series of about 11 months. That evidence was presented to the grand jury. And it's not the government. It's not the Department of Justice. It's not Todd Blanche that returned an indictment against James Comey. It's the grand jury, part of the judicial process, and that this process has to be allowed to play out in the courts. It's not fair to Mr. Comey, it's certainly not fair to the prosecutors for us to be airing your view or my view of this indictment. It's something that will be presented in court at the time set by the judge.”

RedWave Press

212,892 views • 3 months ago

When the President threatens you and it results in threats to your family. That is enough to keep a lot of people quiet. That's the point. The intimidation is the point. So others watch and say, "That's not for me." But yesterday, a Grand Jury of anonymous citizens pushed back.

When the President threatens you and it results in threats to your family. That is enough to keep a lot of people quiet. That's the point. The intimidation is the point. So others watch and say, "That's not for me." But yesterday, a Grand Jury of anonymous citizens pushed back.

Sen. Elissa Slotkin

45,775 views • 6 months ago

MUST WATCH 🚨: NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “How do you prove intent, Mr. Blanche, when Mr. Comey himself said he didn't understand that some people would look at that and think about violence?” Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche: “You prove intent like you always prove intent. You prove intent with witnesses, you prove intent with documents, with materials. So again, this is not just about a single Instagram post. This is about a body of evidence that the grand jury collected over the series of about 11 months. That evidence was presented to the grand jury. And it's not the government. It's not the Department of Justice. It's not Todd Blanche that returned an indictment against James Comey. It's the grand jury, part of the judicial process, and that this process has to be allowed to play out in the courts. It's not fair to Mr. Comey, it's certainly not fair to the prosecutors for us to be airing your view or my view of this indictment. It's something that will be presented in court at the time set by the judge.”

MUST WATCH 🚨: NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “How do you prove intent, Mr. Blanche, when Mr. Comey himself said he didn't understand that some people would look at that and think about violence?” Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche: “You prove intent like you always prove intent. You prove intent with witnesses, you prove intent with documents, with materials. So again, this is not just about a single Instagram post. This is about a body of evidence that the grand jury collected over the series of about 11 months. That evidence was presented to the grand jury. And it's not the government. It's not the Department of Justice. It's not Todd Blanche that returned an indictment against James Comey. It's the grand jury, part of the judicial process, and that this process has to be allowed to play out in the courts. It's not fair to Mr. Comey, it's certainly not fair to the prosecutors for us to be airing your view or my view of this indictment. It's something that will be presented in court at the time set by the judge.”

Dr Charlie Ward

162,094 views • 6 days ago

.Karoline Leavitt SLAMS the media for running cover for the SPLC: "This was a grand jury indictment made up of Americans who realize that this organization was engaging in criminal activity, and they need to be held accountable for it."

.Karoline Leavitt SLAMS the media for running cover for the SPLC: "This was a grand jury indictment made up of Americans who realize that this organization was engaging in criminal activity, and they need to be held accountable for it."

Trump War Room

29,155 views • 3 months ago

🚨 JUST IN: Vice President JD Vance FIRES BACK at leftists claiming a grand jury in Alexandria, Virginia indicting James Comey is "political" - "Not exactly a hotbed of Donald Trump's political support!" "Unfortunately for James Comey, when I look at this indictment, I see a guy who LIED under oath and he'll have his day in court. He'll have his opportunity to prove the other case in front of the jury." "But the idea that this is driven by politics, I think it's preposterous when you actually read the details of the indictment and the obvious fact that James Comey did lie under oath to Congress MULTIPLE times."

🚨 JUST IN: Vice President JD Vance FIRES BACK at leftists claiming a grand jury in Alexandria, Virginia indicting James Comey is "political" - "Not exactly a hotbed of Donald Trump's political support!" "Unfortunately for James Comey, when I look at this indictment, I see a guy who LIED under oath and he'll have his day in court. He'll have his opportunity to prove the other case in front of the jury." "But the idea that this is driven by politics, I think it's preposterous when you actually read the details of the indictment and the obvious fact that James Comey did lie under oath to Congress MULTIPLE times."

Eric Daugherty

161,275 views • 10 months ago

BOMBSHELL: The Defense for Tyler Robinson just revealed that there is a TWENTY TWO PAGE document that they want to REDACT. This is almost definitely the Twiggs recording. "We have provided the state, I want to say about a day and a half ago, with proposed redactions because we believe that portions of it are not admissible even in a preliminary hearing." "And the way we did that is we provided a transcript and then a redacted version of the transcript of the entire video-recorded interview." "It may be that the court wants to look at the proposed redactions not while court is in session, but during some other period of time, because the transcript of the video, uh, which we prepared and we provided to the state so the state could raise any concerns about the accuracy of the transcript." "That's not an issue. The admissibility of portions of the video, or the issue, is about 20 pages, maybe 22 pages." Why is the defense pushing to REDACT the truth?

BOMBSHELL: The Defense for Tyler Robinson just revealed that there is a TWENTY TWO PAGE document that they want to REDACT. This is almost definitely the Twiggs recording. "We have provided the state, I want to say about a day and a half ago, with proposed redactions because we believe that portions of it are not admissible even in a preliminary hearing." "And the way we did that is we provided a transcript and then a redacted version of the transcript of the entire video-recorded interview." "It may be that the court wants to look at the proposed redactions not while court is in session, but during some other period of time, because the transcript of the video, uh, which we prepared and we provided to the state so the state could raise any concerns about the accuracy of the transcript." "That's not an issue. The admissibility of portions of the video, or the issue, is about 20 pages, maybe 22 pages." Why is the defense pushing to REDACT the truth?

Gunther Eagleman™

365,699 views • 1 month ago

Reporter: When I opened it, I gasped because I thought we were going to see something. What I saw instead was a 100 page document that says 'Grand Jury of New York' at the top of it, and that's the only text that you can see. It goes on for 119 pages where every single page of it is completely and 100% blacked out.

Reporter: When I opened it, I gasped because I thought we were going to see something. What I saw instead was a 100 page document that says 'Grand Jury of New York' at the top of it, and that's the only text that you can see. It goes on for 119 pages where every single page of it is completely and 100% blacked out.

FactPost

525,729 views • 7 months ago

MARKWAYNE MULLIN: Bondi can't release Epstein information because if it has been heard by a grand jury, the judge that oversaw the case has to release it, and you know that JAKE TAPPER: I don't think that's correct. It doesn't work that way.

MARKWAYNE MULLIN: Bondi can't release Epstein information because if it has been heard by a grand jury, the judge that oversaw the case has to release it, and you know that JAKE TAPPER: I don't think that's correct. It doesn't work that way.

Aaron Rupar

591,596 views • 1 year ago

CNN’s Scott Jennings on a grand jury rejecting the Trump administration’s attempts to charge the so-called ‘seditious six’ Democrat lawmakers... “Well, I think two things can be true. One, and I’ve been highly defensive of the grand jury system, whether it’s been in the cases in Virginia, the case in Minneapolis, this one — look, grand juries exist for a reason. Citizens go in there, they look at evidence, they make decisions. And I think if you’re going to cheer on a grand jury one week, you got to cheer on a grand jury in the next week. That’s number one. Number two, the video was extraordinarily irresponsible. Ridiculous not a one of them can yet name any illegal order that they’re referencing. Not one of them has ever been able to name the illegal orders. Extremely irresponsible. Is that criminal? That’s up to a grand jury. A grand jury says no.” “I mean, this video was extraordinarily irresponsible but, you know, I’m not even sure what they were proposing to charge them with. I’m not sure the reporting has that, but obviously a grand jury looked at it and said no. Now am I super surprised about that? Look, Donald Trump got 6.5% of the vote in the District of Columbia. Do I am I surprised that 20 people from D.C. went into a room and wouldn’t follow the Trump DOJ’s recommendations? No, I’m not super surprised.”

CNN’s Scott Jennings on a grand jury rejecting the Trump administration’s attempts to charge the so-called ‘seditious six’ Democrat lawmakers... “Well, I think two things can be true. One, and I’ve been highly defensive of the grand jury system, whether it’s been in the cases in Virginia, the case in Minneapolis, this one — look, grand juries exist for a reason. Citizens go in there, they look at evidence, they make decisions. And I think if you’re going to cheer on a grand jury one week, you got to cheer on a grand jury in the next week. That’s number one. Number two, the video was extraordinarily irresponsible. Ridiculous not a one of them can yet name any illegal order that they’re referencing. Not one of them has ever been able to name the illegal orders. Extremely irresponsible. Is that criminal? That’s up to a grand jury. A grand jury says no.” “I mean, this video was extraordinarily irresponsible but, you know, I’m not even sure what they were proposing to charge them with. I’m not sure the reporting has that, but obviously a grand jury looked at it and said no. Now am I super surprised about that? Look, Donald Trump got 6.5% of the vote in the District of Columbia. Do I am I surprised that 20 people from D.C. went into a room and wouldn’t follow the Trump DOJ’s recommendations? No, I’m not super surprised.”

Curtis Houck

19,876 views • 6 months ago

Mikel Arteta says even if he gives the players a break from each other then they would just meet up anyway: “That's the theory, and I wish we could be in Dubai. So, if we have one or two days, I guarantee you that we were in Dubai for a few days, even if it was for a few days, because everybody was dying for it. “But then you get very surprised because sometimes, when I give them the day off, and you think that they don't want to see each other, no? Then I find out that Eight players or ten were having dinner in somebody's house. They spent the whole afternoon together… “And that's the beauty of it, the fact that they want to be together because they feel like being together is the best thing that they can do. And that was the case this week as well in a lot of cases.”

Mikel Arteta says even if he gives the players a break from each other then they would just meet up anyway: “That's the theory, and I wish we could be in Dubai. So, if we have one or two days, I guarantee you that we were in Dubai for a few days, even if it was for a few days, because everybody was dying for it. “But then you get very surprised because sometimes, when I give them the day off, and you think that they don't want to see each other, no? Then I find out that Eight players or ten were having dinner in somebody's house. They spent the whole afternoon together… “And that's the beauty of it, the fact that they want to be together because they feel like being together is the best thing that they can do. And that was the case this week as well in a lot of cases.”

Connor Humm

414,911 views • 5 months ago

Eisen: It’s exactly as legally effective as if you and I wrote an indictment of Donald Trump right here on MeidasTouch. She had never been before a grand jury — she’s an insurance lawyer. The reason they put Lindsey Halligan there was because the regular prosecutors refused to prosecute the case, wanted nothing to do with it, because the charges against Comey are so bogus and made up. This is another example where we’ve filed a legal brief on behalf of former judges to tell the court this is a joke and a new low. The indictment wasn’t even presented to the grand jury. None of us have ever heard of anything like this. This case is going to be flushed by the courts — it should be. We’ve already seen Donald Trump start to lose some of these baseless criminal prosecutions, and this is another one that I think is doomed because of the incompetence. Who knows how much trouble we’d be in if Donald Trump were a competent authoritarian?

Eisen: It’s exactly as legally effective as if you and I wrote an indictment of Donald Trump right here on MeidasTouch. She had never been before a grand jury — she’s an insurance lawyer. The reason they put Lindsey Halligan there was because the regular prosecutors refused to prosecute the case, wanted nothing to do with it, because the charges against Comey are so bogus and made up. This is another example where we’ve filed a legal brief on behalf of former judges to tell the court this is a joke and a new low. The indictment wasn’t even presented to the grand jury. None of us have ever heard of anything like this. This case is going to be flushed by the courts — it should be. We’ve already seen Donald Trump start to lose some of these baseless criminal prosecutions, and this is another one that I think is doomed because of the incompetence. Who knows how much trouble we’d be in if Donald Trump were a competent authoritarian?

Acyn

96,216 views • 8 months ago

President Biden: The American principle that no one is above the law was reaffirmed. Donald Trump was given every opportunity to defend himself. It was a state case, not a federal case. And it was heard by a jury of 12 citizens. 12 Americans, 12 people like you. Like millions of Americans who served on juries, this jury is chosen the same way every jury in America is chosen. It was a process that Donald Trump's attorney was part of. The jury heard five weeks of evidence. After careful deliberation, the jury reached a unanimous verdict. They found Donald Trump guilty on all 34 felony counts. Now he’ll be given the opportunity as he should to appeal that decision just like everyone else has that opportunity. That's how the American system of justice works. And it's reckless, it's dangerous, and it's irresponsible for anyone to say this was rigged just because they don't like the verdict. Our justice system has endured for nearly 250 years and it literally is the cornerstone of America. The justice system should be respected, and we should never allow anyone to tear it down. That's America. That's who we are. And that's who we will always be, God willing

President Biden: The American principle that no one is above the law was reaffirmed. Donald Trump was given every opportunity to defend himself. It was a state case, not a federal case. And it was heard by a jury of 12 citizens. 12 Americans, 12 people like you. Like millions of Americans who served on juries, this jury is chosen the same way every jury in America is chosen. It was a process that Donald Trump's attorney was part of. The jury heard five weeks of evidence. After careful deliberation, the jury reached a unanimous verdict. They found Donald Trump guilty on all 34 felony counts. Now he’ll be given the opportunity as he should to appeal that decision just like everyone else has that opportunity. That's how the American system of justice works. And it's reckless, it's dangerous, and it's irresponsible for anyone to say this was rigged just because they don't like the verdict. Our justice system has endured for nearly 250 years and it literally is the cornerstone of America. The justice system should be respected, and we should never allow anyone to tear it down. That's America. That's who we are. And that's who we will always be, God willing

Headquarters

1,286,977 views • 2 years ago

“The U.N. — I don’t care what the U.N. says. The U.N. doesn’t know what they’re talking about. Maduro is indicted by a grand jury in the Southern District of New York.” “That means the Southern District of New York presented the evidence to a grand jury, and a grand jury indicted him. And then a superseding indictment came out that was unsealed about a year and a half ago that specifically detailed Maduro’s actions.” “Let there be no doubt: Nicolás Maduro is an indicted drug trafficker in the United States, and he’s a fugitive of American justice.” — Secretary of State Marco Rubio, 9/4/25

“The U.N. — I don’t care what the U.N. says. The U.N. doesn’t know what they’re talking about. Maduro is indicted by a grand jury in the Southern District of New York.” “That means the Southern District of New York presented the evidence to a grand jury, and a grand jury indicted him. And then a superseding indictment came out that was unsealed about a year and a half ago that specifically detailed Maduro’s actions.” “Let there be no doubt: Nicolás Maduro is an indicted drug trafficker in the United States, and he’s a fugitive of American justice.” — Secretary of State Marco Rubio, 9/4/25

Hillel Neuer

112,352 views • 7 months ago