Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Men must stop calling their wives makoti?🥴 The term makoti originates from either the “Dutch/Afrikaans” phrase Maak ons tee, which roughly translates to “make us tea.” 😭 Link: Nasty C Chris Brown Tyler ICU Ariana Grande Maglera #Cabinet Roodepoort

ThisIsColbert's profile picture

YaseBlock B 🇸🇿

141,107 subscribers

113,537 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

ЮморИскусствоЕда#Cabinet
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля 水astido
水astido2 лет назад

This is widely known though.. this is not some big discovery.

Фото профиля Bhut Bushula
Bhut Bushula2 лет назад

Well it's now called makoti,not maak ons tea... So what's the fuss about

Фото профиля Tarnant.son
Tarnant.son2 лет назад

And call them what? Aint no way am stopping

Фото профиля Marvin Wagner
Marvin Wagner2 лет назад

Oh shit I didn’t know this 😂😂🙆🏽‍♂️

Фото профиля Sizwesabamnyama Nkosifikile
Sizwesabamnyama Nkosifikile2 лет назад

This guy will make me stop smoking weed

Фото профиля Mandisa
Mandisa2 лет назад

That word should classified as derogatory. Noone should use it to another human being Men should tell their parents not to call their wives makoti makoti. Yherr

Фото профиля MphoRamphele👸🏿❤
MphoRamphele👸🏿❤2 лет назад

Wow! I didn't know this. So you get married to make tea? Hee banna! Bathong 😂

Фото профиля Katalie
Katalie2 лет назад

That's a pure lie needs to be relevant 😴

Фото профиля Hard Evidence
Hard Evidence2 лет назад

Credulous we are

Фото профиля D.Reenkerk🇿🇦🇩🇪
D.Reenkerk🇿🇦🇩🇪2 лет назад

So what's the right word for the family of the groom to refer to his wife? _ in all 10 languages..?

Похожие видео

A man who claims to be a woman attempted to explain what women think about men who claim to be women. He completely failed. *ahem* • “They reject the distinction between gender identity and sex and that these two things can be in conflict” No. We know that gender identity & sex are very different. In fact that is basically our entire argument. Gender identity = a manmade concept. Sex = Naturally observable over the entire natural world, including humans. Binary & immutable. • “They are concerned with the safety & integrity of spaces that are typically reserved for women” No. Not “typically”. *Are*. ARE reserved for women. “Typically” is an admission that you know the group trying to gain access to the women’s spaces aren’t women. Which is our entire point to begin with, sir. They’re men. • “Trans people are concerned with safety & privacy in private spaces.” Great. Then leave women’s spaces alone, respecting the women who want them, and focus on creating your own spaces catering to your “man claiming to be woman” needs, whatever they may be. We won’t stop you. • “Trans people are seeking to go about their business & mind their business” Cool story, but the problem is the process of that appears to be changing the definition of “woman” in law & gaining access to women’s spaces, services & sport. So we fight back because we are not willing to give up our rights & needs so men in dresses can “go about their business”. • “We have had inclusive policies… and there was not a spate of people pretending to be trans, going into spaces & abusing anyone.” Either a) you’re ignoring all of the cases of men invading women’s spaces & sexually assaulting women - we can name 10 examples just in prisons off the top of our head - because it doesn’t suit your argument; b) you’re completely aware & just lying; c) you argument is they weren’t “trans” which means they must have been making it up; d) even if there were no cases, it still doesn’t make men women! • “Discomfort alone is not grounds to exclude people.” No, it isn’t. Sex is. Men are excluded from women’s spaces on the basis of sex. We exclude all men, including men with a gender identity and men we are comfortable with. It’s frankly unforgivable to speak this untruthfully about this issue in 2026, and it’s utterly shameful that two men just nodded along to blatantly obvious untruths. This is the intellectual equivalent of junk food.
1:20

A man who claims to be a woman attempted to explain what women think about men who claim to be women. He completely failed. *ahem* • “They reject the distinction between gender identity and sex and that these two things can be in conflict” No. We know that gender identity & sex are very different. In fact that is basically our entire argument. Gender identity = a manmade concept. Sex = Naturally observable over the entire natural world, including humans. Binary & immutable. • “They are concerned with the safety & integrity of spaces that are typically reserved for women” No. Not “typically”. *Are*. ARE reserved for women. “Typically” is an admission that you know the group trying to gain access to the women’s spaces aren’t women. Which is our entire point to begin with, sir. They’re men. • “Trans people are concerned with safety & privacy in private spaces.” Great. Then leave women’s spaces alone, respecting the women who want them, and focus on creating your own spaces catering to your “man claiming to be woman” needs, whatever they may be. We won’t stop you. • “Trans people are seeking to go about their business & mind their business” Cool story, but the problem is the process of that appears to be changing the definition of “woman” in law & gaining access to women’s spaces, services & sport. So we fight back because we are not willing to give up our rights & needs so men in dresses can “go about their business”. • “We have had inclusive policies… and there was not a spate of people pretending to be trans, going into spaces & abusing anyone.” Either a) you’re ignoring all of the cases of men invading women’s spaces & sexually assaulting women - we can name 10 examples just in prisons off the top of our head - because it doesn’t suit your argument; b) you’re completely aware & just lying; c) you argument is they weren’t “trans” which means they must have been making it up; d) even if there were no cases, it still doesn’t make men women! • “Discomfort alone is not grounds to exclude people.” No, it isn’t. Sex is. Men are excluded from women’s spaces on the basis of sex. We exclude all men, including men with a gender identity and men we are comfortable with. It’s frankly unforgivable to speak this untruthfully about this issue in 2026, and it’s utterly shameful that two men just nodded along to blatantly obvious untruths. This is the intellectual equivalent of junk food.

Sall Grover

122,808 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

"Islamic Ummah" By: Ofer Binshtok The identity of the Muslim is solely to be a part of the global Islamic nation, without any connection to a nation-state or to another culture that is not the Islamic nation. The idea of independent Islamic nation-states contradicts the Islamic idea as it is found in the Quran and the Sunnah of Muhammad. A Muslim, wherever he is in the world, is part of the Islamic nation. A nation that should be ruled by a caliph through Sharia law. Islam is a global political-religious worldview of a world without borders. The existing Islamic nation-states are actually an act of heresy. A disbeliever who converts to Islam must completely break away from his former identity, become part of the Islamic nation, and serve its purposes personally. Every Muslim, wherever he is, is personally obligated to act so that the Islamic nation will be established—that is to say, to collapse every nation-state that exists in the world so that the Islamic nation will replace it. The fact that the idea of ummah is included in the central motif of the Quran is evidence of the vital significance of this concept. In Islamic terminology, the term "Ummah" refers to the religious community, also known as the Islamic holy community. This is the primary interpretation of the phrase found in the Qur'an. Quran 2.128 "Our Lord, and make us Muslims [in submission] to You and from our descendants a Muslim nation [in submission] to You. And show us our rites and accept our repentance. Indeed, You are the Accepting of repentance, the Merciful." Quran 2.143 "Thus, have We made of you an Ummat justly balanced, that ye might be witnesses over the nations, and the Messenger a witness over yourselves; and We appointed the Qibla to which thou wast used, only to test those who followed the Messenger from those who would turn on their heels (From the Faith). Indeed it was (A change) momentous, except to those guided by Allah. And never would Allah Make your faith of no effect. For Allah is to all people Most surely full of kindness, Most Merciful." Quran 3.104 "Let there be one nation of you, calling to good, and bidding to honour, and forbidding dishonour; those are the prosperers." Quran 3.110 "You are the best nation produced [as an example] for mankind. You enjoin what is right and forbid what is wrong and believe in Allah. If only the People of the Scripture had believed, it would have been better for them. Among them are believers, but most of them are defiantly disobedient." Quran 16.92 "And be not like her who undoes the thread which she has spun after it has become strong, by taking your oaths a means of deception among yourselves, lest a nation may be more numerous than another nation. Allah only tests you by this [i.e who obeys Allah and fulfills Allah's Covenant and who disobeys Allah and breaks Allah's Covenant]. And on the Day of Resurrection, He will certainly make clear to you that wherein you used to differ [i.e. a believer confesses and believes in the Oneness of Allah and in the Prophethood of Prophet Muhammad SAW which the disbeliever denies it and that was their difference amongst them in the life of this world]." Tafsir Al-Qurtubi, volume 1, page 649: Muhammad said, "The earth was made a mosque for me." Sahih al-Bukhari, 3167: "The Prophet said, "If you embrace Islam, you will be safe. You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle." Source: MEMRI TV Source: Online Platforms - "Al-Aqsa Call on YouTube"Al-Aqsa Mosque Address By Palestinian Islamic Scholar Issam Amira: Palestinian Nationalism Is A 'Heretical Innovation' Created By The Sykes-Picot Agreement To Prevent The Rise Of Islam, Which Is The Only Valid Identity, Political System. Link to the entire video:
0:24

"Islamic Ummah" By: Ofer Binshtok The identity of the Muslim is solely to be a part of the global Islamic nation, without any connection to a nation-state or to another culture that is not the Islamic nation. The idea of independent Islamic nation-states contradicts the Islamic idea as it is found in the Quran and the Sunnah of Muhammad. A Muslim, wherever he is in the world, is part of the Islamic nation. A nation that should be ruled by a caliph through Sharia law. Islam is a global political-religious worldview of a world without borders. The existing Islamic nation-states are actually an act of heresy. A disbeliever who converts to Islam must completely break away from his former identity, become part of the Islamic nation, and serve its purposes personally. Every Muslim, wherever he is, is personally obligated to act so that the Islamic nation will be established—that is to say, to collapse every nation-state that exists in the world so that the Islamic nation will replace it. The fact that the idea of ummah is included in the central motif of the Quran is evidence of the vital significance of this concept. In Islamic terminology, the term "Ummah" refers to the religious community, also known as the Islamic holy community. This is the primary interpretation of the phrase found in the Qur'an. Quran 2.128 "Our Lord, and make us Muslims [in submission] to You and from our descendants a Muslim nation [in submission] to You. And show us our rites and accept our repentance. Indeed, You are the Accepting of repentance, the Merciful." Quran 2.143 "Thus, have We made of you an Ummat justly balanced, that ye might be witnesses over the nations, and the Messenger a witness over yourselves; and We appointed the Qibla to which thou wast used, only to test those who followed the Messenger from those who would turn on their heels (From the Faith). Indeed it was (A change) momentous, except to those guided by Allah. And never would Allah Make your faith of no effect. For Allah is to all people Most surely full of kindness, Most Merciful." Quran 3.104 "Let there be one nation of you, calling to good, and bidding to honour, and forbidding dishonour; those are the prosperers." Quran 3.110 "You are the best nation produced [as an example] for mankind. You enjoin what is right and forbid what is wrong and believe in Allah. If only the People of the Scripture had believed, it would have been better for them. Among them are believers, but most of them are defiantly disobedient." Quran 16.92 "And be not like her who undoes the thread which she has spun after it has become strong, by taking your oaths a means of deception among yourselves, lest a nation may be more numerous than another nation. Allah only tests you by this [i.e who obeys Allah and fulfills Allah's Covenant and who disobeys Allah and breaks Allah's Covenant]. And on the Day of Resurrection, He will certainly make clear to you that wherein you used to differ [i.e. a believer confesses and believes in the Oneness of Allah and in the Prophethood of Prophet Muhammad SAW which the disbeliever denies it and that was their difference amongst them in the life of this world]." Tafsir Al-Qurtubi, volume 1, page 649: Muhammad said, "The earth was made a mosque for me." Sahih al-Bukhari, 3167: "The Prophet said, "If you embrace Islam, you will be safe. You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle." Source: MEMRI TV Source: Online Platforms - "Al-Aqsa Call on YouTube"Al-Aqsa Mosque Address By Palestinian Islamic Scholar Issam Amira: Palestinian Nationalism Is A 'Heretical Innovation' Created By The Sykes-Picot Agreement To Prevent The Rise Of Islam, Which Is The Only Valid Identity, Political System. Link to the entire video:

Ofer Binshtok - Kafir - עופר בינשטוק

278,292 просмотров • 2 лет назад

One thing I can’t stand is fake… That’s why I mostly keep to myself. All the virtue signaling just makes me physically sick to my stomach. The shit is so corny on both sides of the aisle. Let’s be real… This “outrage” isn’t about the fundamental value of a life or reach of the government. You leftists must think we’re all dumb. Just like after George Floyd died y’all pretended it was about “black men”, then all of a sudden it was “black trans lives matter”, then it was about the immigrants now it’s back to American citizen rights? First, many of you do not like Black men, which is why leftists try to make us stand in the back or silence us altogether when we start speaking uncomfortable truth. Here’s dirty little secret… an unhealthy portion of the black men that go to jail in America, do so because black women call the same police they claim are racist. And too many times they’re lying on that man. Second, you don’t care about immigrants, or you would demand our overinflated government and intelligence community stop ruining their countries, by rigging elections that for some strange reason always end up with communist regimes. You for damn sure wouldn’t let Rachel Maddow and company, reduce their existence to being justified by picking our crops and cleaning the bathrooms. That’s some dehumanizing shit. Third, you definitely don’t mind the government being too big or having too much power in general and you don’t mind it killing for your political agenda. Thought experiment… If President Trump didn’t win, had returned to civilian life, was pulled over by police and made the same move with his vehicle resulting in him being killed the same way… a lot of you would be celebrating in the streets just like when Charlie Kirk was killed. So stop pretending you’re some principled revolutionaries fighting for “everybody’s rights”, you’re using this woman’s tragic death as another political opportunity. Don’t think us Black men are too stupid to see it. With me you’re dealing with one you can’t gaslight, talk in circles with or pose as the “power to the people”. You would give the government infinite power and the broadest discretion to use lethal force in a heartbeat if it meant you can have your way. Finally, you don’t believe in the word citizenship… So how can you talk about rights or even begin to determine what a government should or shouldn’t be able to do? The only way “the people” have any power is if there is a country (keyword) with laws that codifies citizenship and RIGHTS as self evident. We are a nation of petulant children politically and the sacred honor is at an all-time low, which is why the contradiction is so high and nothing seems to get better. But we did close that border, the trade deficit is down and we will not be tricked into our own national demise by people who hate this country almost as much as they hate themselves. THIS IS WHY THE LIBERAL AND CONSERVATIVE MEDIA RUN FROM ME! Logic has been lost in our society by design. The problem in America and our system isn’t white supremacy, the problem is intellectual laziness, naivety and when all else fails projection and scapegoating. The only attack on black and brown communities is the white liberals that have been smiling in your face while robbing you for the last 60 years. Like they’re doing in Minnesota. Along with the black and brown community “leaders” who took the money from the “guilty system”. Maybe I should run for President soon. Royce White for U.S. Senate MN 2026 America 1st, Just Right™️
1:58

One thing I can’t stand is fake… That’s why I mostly keep to myself. All the virtue signaling just makes me physically sick to my stomach. The shit is so corny on both sides of the aisle. Let’s be real… This “outrage” isn’t about the fundamental value of a life or reach of the government. You leftists must think we’re all dumb. Just like after George Floyd died y’all pretended it was about “black men”, then all of a sudden it was “black trans lives matter”, then it was about the immigrants now it’s back to American citizen rights? First, many of you do not like Black men, which is why leftists try to make us stand in the back or silence us altogether when we start speaking uncomfortable truth. Here’s dirty little secret… an unhealthy portion of the black men that go to jail in America, do so because black women call the same police they claim are racist. And too many times they’re lying on that man. Second, you don’t care about immigrants, or you would demand our overinflated government and intelligence community stop ruining their countries, by rigging elections that for some strange reason always end up with communist regimes. You for damn sure wouldn’t let Rachel Maddow and company, reduce their existence to being justified by picking our crops and cleaning the bathrooms. That’s some dehumanizing shit. Third, you definitely don’t mind the government being too big or having too much power in general and you don’t mind it killing for your political agenda. Thought experiment… If President Trump didn’t win, had returned to civilian life, was pulled over by police and made the same move with his vehicle resulting in him being killed the same way… a lot of you would be celebrating in the streets just like when Charlie Kirk was killed. So stop pretending you’re some principled revolutionaries fighting for “everybody’s rights”, you’re using this woman’s tragic death as another political opportunity. Don’t think us Black men are too stupid to see it. With me you’re dealing with one you can’t gaslight, talk in circles with or pose as the “power to the people”. You would give the government infinite power and the broadest discretion to use lethal force in a heartbeat if it meant you can have your way. Finally, you don’t believe in the word citizenship… So how can you talk about rights or even begin to determine what a government should or shouldn’t be able to do? The only way “the people” have any power is if there is a country (keyword) with laws that codifies citizenship and RIGHTS as self evident. We are a nation of petulant children politically and the sacred honor is at an all-time low, which is why the contradiction is so high and nothing seems to get better. But we did close that border, the trade deficit is down and we will not be tricked into our own national demise by people who hate this country almost as much as they hate themselves. THIS IS WHY THE LIBERAL AND CONSERVATIVE MEDIA RUN FROM ME! Logic has been lost in our society by design. The problem in America and our system isn’t white supremacy, the problem is intellectual laziness, naivety and when all else fails projection and scapegoating. The only attack on black and brown communities is the white liberals that have been smiling in your face while robbing you for the last 60 years. Like they’re doing in Minnesota. Along with the black and brown community “leaders” who took the money from the “guilty system”. Maybe I should run for President soon. Royce White for U.S. Senate MN 2026 America 1st, Just Right™️

Royce White 🇺🇸

152,321 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Fundamentally wrong on multiple levels. First of all, if your reaction to the defeat and removal of a swarm of foreign invaders is "that's cruel", then you are not ready to make adult judgements about foreign policy, and shouldn't be allowed to vote. Let me make it simpler: You are supposed to be cruel to your enemies, you silly person. They are not your friends you haven't met yet. They are your enemies. They mean to hurt you, either because they hate you, or because they want what you have, and don't care what happens to you when they take it. Sacrificing your countrymen and your civilization over naive principles you learned from your midwit kindergarten teacher is a disgusting moral betrayal. It is your countrymen, and your civilization, that defend you, sustain you, and provide for you every good thing that you have, including everything from the right to say silly things online to the smartphone you say them with. To set all that at nothing so you can virtue signal is not only silly... it's ungrateful. And ungrateful people are trash. Secondly, if you describe deporting the dregs of the third world back to where they belong as "warlord" behavior, you not only have no idea what a warlord is, you have no idea what most of the world is like, and you are unqualified to vote in elections that effect foreign policy. Warlords do not chain their enemies up, load them onto planes, bring them back to their homelands and set them free. Warlords feeds their enemies to dogs. Was your best friend dragged out of his home by masked men, in front of his wife and child, and stuffed into a waiting van? Was his naked corpse found hanging from a lamp post the next day, covered in burn marks and puncture wounds from an electric drill? That's what warlords do. So save the term for when you actually need it. Trump was and is the soft option. If you somehow manage to thwart him, I promise you that you really, really will not like who comes next. Third, western civilization has been brought to the brink of inevitable collapse because you listened to silly women who think military-age males from Ethnicklashistan are cute puppies who need love and understanding. You have to stop caring what silly women think. Because you will not reason them out of this. They will continue to believe in Cute-Puppy Theory, right up until the moment they get raped, stabbed, or both. People from places where human life is cheap, behave as if human life is cheap. But silly women cannot imagine this. Their definition of the word "attack" is someone saying mean things about them on twitter, kind of like I'm doing right now. People like this have been sheltered so well, for so long, by others who capable of ruthlessness and violence, that they forget what they are being sheltered from, or what ruthlessness is for. And then they start interfering with the very people and processes that protect their safe space, and indeed their lives. Because defending your tribe is mean to Cute Puppies or something. Fourth, anyone who think political power is maintained by appeasing your enemies has clearly never had any power to maintain. Your must energize and reward your friends, and discredit and demoralize your enemies. The left isn't going to stop hating western civilization if we keep our sober faces on and pretend we're not overjoyed about winning out over obvious evil and depravity. Appeasing the left has no value at all, because what the left wants is "everything", and they destroy anything they get their hands on, then demand more. Anyone who thinks deportations are "mean" is part of the same set of people who gave us this problem in the first place. And the only reason things are better now is that we stopped caring what they think.
2:17

Fundamentally wrong on multiple levels. First of all, if your reaction to the defeat and removal of a swarm of foreign invaders is "that's cruel", then you are not ready to make adult judgements about foreign policy, and shouldn't be allowed to vote. Let me make it simpler: You are supposed to be cruel to your enemies, you silly person. They are not your friends you haven't met yet. They are your enemies. They mean to hurt you, either because they hate you, or because they want what you have, and don't care what happens to you when they take it. Sacrificing your countrymen and your civilization over naive principles you learned from your midwit kindergarten teacher is a disgusting moral betrayal. It is your countrymen, and your civilization, that defend you, sustain you, and provide for you every good thing that you have, including everything from the right to say silly things online to the smartphone you say them with. To set all that at nothing so you can virtue signal is not only silly... it's ungrateful. And ungrateful people are trash. Secondly, if you describe deporting the dregs of the third world back to where they belong as "warlord" behavior, you not only have no idea what a warlord is, you have no idea what most of the world is like, and you are unqualified to vote in elections that effect foreign policy. Warlords do not chain their enemies up, load them onto planes, bring them back to their homelands and set them free. Warlords feeds their enemies to dogs. Was your best friend dragged out of his home by masked men, in front of his wife and child, and stuffed into a waiting van? Was his naked corpse found hanging from a lamp post the next day, covered in burn marks and puncture wounds from an electric drill? That's what warlords do. So save the term for when you actually need it. Trump was and is the soft option. If you somehow manage to thwart him, I promise you that you really, really will not like who comes next. Third, western civilization has been brought to the brink of inevitable collapse because you listened to silly women who think military-age males from Ethnicklashistan are cute puppies who need love and understanding. You have to stop caring what silly women think. Because you will not reason them out of this. They will continue to believe in Cute-Puppy Theory, right up until the moment they get raped, stabbed, or both. People from places where human life is cheap, behave as if human life is cheap. But silly women cannot imagine this. Their definition of the word "attack" is someone saying mean things about them on twitter, kind of like I'm doing right now. People like this have been sheltered so well, for so long, by others who capable of ruthlessness and violence, that they forget what they are being sheltered from, or what ruthlessness is for. And then they start interfering with the very people and processes that protect their safe space, and indeed their lives. Because defending your tribe is mean to Cute Puppies or something. Fourth, anyone who think political power is maintained by appeasing your enemies has clearly never had any power to maintain. Your must energize and reward your friends, and discredit and demoralize your enemies. The left isn't going to stop hating western civilization if we keep our sober faces on and pretend we're not overjoyed about winning out over obvious evil and depravity. Appeasing the left has no value at all, because what the left wants is "everything", and they destroy anything they get their hands on, then demand more. Anyone who thinks deportations are "mean" is part of the same set of people who gave us this problem in the first place. And the only reason things are better now is that we stopped caring what they think.

Devon Eriksen

43,861 просмотров • 1 год назад

Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut... and you have to hear about this guy because it's one of the most incredible, most brazen, most dishonest examples of hypocrisy you'll ever see in American politics. Maybe ever. And there's a lot of competition, believe me. Back in 2014, Murphy is on the Senate floor, he's giving speeches, he's writing resolutions, and he's telling every Republican in Washington... don't you dare undermine these Iran negotiations. Don't do it. He said if Congress shows it doesn't take the talks seriously, it'll destroy our credibility with allies, scare off our negotiating partners, give Russia and China an excuse to walk, and leave us with nothing but a military option. His words. Not anyone else's. His words. And by the way, Trump rebuilt the military, made it the strongest, the most powerful, the most technologically advanced fighting force the world has ever seen... nobody's even close... so the military option isn't quite the disaster it would've been under the previous administration, but that's a separate story. So what happens? Trump gets back into office, and he starts serious indirect talks with Iran. April 2025. Oman-mediated. Very tough, very sophisticated negotiations. Steve Witkoff, incredible guy, working the back channels. Trump gave them a real deadline... sixty days... because he doesn't do endless process. He does deals. Zero enrichment, ship out the uranium, dismantle the key sites, open the doors to inspectors. Clear demands. Generous terms, frankly, very generous, because he didn't have to offer them anything. He could've just hit them. But Trump wanted to give diplomacy a chance because that's what a strong leader does. And what does Murphy do? The same Chris Murphy who said you must not undermine negotiations while they're happening? He goes on television. He goes to Iran International, which the Iranians are watching, and he calls Trump a liar. Says he has no idea what Trump is trying to achieve. Says most of what Trump says isn't real. He pushes war powers resolutions to tie the President's hands. He's out there broadcasting American division to the entire world... to Iran, to our allies, to everybody... while the United States is sitting at the table trying to close a deal that could've avoided all of this. All of it. And it gets worse. Murphy secretly met with Iran's foreign minister, Javad Zarif, back in 2020. Secretly. Behind everyone's back. During Trump's first term. So he'll freelance with the Mullahs, but he won't support his own country's negotiating position when it matters. Think about that. Iran watched all of this. They watched Murphy trash America's leverage in real time. They saw the division. They stalled. They rejected every core demand. Zero enrichment? No. Ship out the uranium? No. Dismantle the facilities? Absolutely not. And the talks collapsed. They collapsed because Iran believed... correctly, unfortunately... that they didn't have to make a deal because half of Washington was working against the other half. And Murphy was leading the charge. So the only card left was the military card. The very thing Murphy warned about in 2014. The very thing he said would happen if politicians undermined negotiations. He predicted the mess. Then he spent a year engineering the mess. Then the military option becomes necessary, and now he's on NPR calling the war "incoherent." Now he's calling Trump senile. Now he wants to block all Senate business and defund the operation. The man who helped make the war inevitable is now complaining about the war. Incredible. And by the way... this is the same guy they're floating for 2028. That's their big idea. A senator from Connecticut who sabotaged his own country's diplomacy, sided with Iran's talking points, and now wants to be President. Good luck with that, Chris. Good luck. You have to ask the question. At what point does undermining your own country's foreign policy in the middle of the most sensitive, most high-stakes, most consequential negotiations in decades... at what point does that stop being opposition and start being something else? Because the people of Connecticut deserve better, the people of this country deserve better, and our incredible warriors now in harm’s way... including the 13 who lost their lives because diplomacy failed... they sure as hell deserve better than Chris Murphy.
3:23

Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut... and you have to hear about this guy because it's one of the most incredible, most brazen, most dishonest examples of hypocrisy you'll ever see in American politics. Maybe ever. And there's a lot of competition, believe me. Back in 2014, Murphy is on the Senate floor, he's giving speeches, he's writing resolutions, and he's telling every Republican in Washington... don't you dare undermine these Iran negotiations. Don't do it. He said if Congress shows it doesn't take the talks seriously, it'll destroy our credibility with allies, scare off our negotiating partners, give Russia and China an excuse to walk, and leave us with nothing but a military option. His words. Not anyone else's. His words. And by the way, Trump rebuilt the military, made it the strongest, the most powerful, the most technologically advanced fighting force the world has ever seen... nobody's even close... so the military option isn't quite the disaster it would've been under the previous administration, but that's a separate story. So what happens? Trump gets back into office, and he starts serious indirect talks with Iran. April 2025. Oman-mediated. Very tough, very sophisticated negotiations. Steve Witkoff, incredible guy, working the back channels. Trump gave them a real deadline... sixty days... because he doesn't do endless process. He does deals. Zero enrichment, ship out the uranium, dismantle the key sites, open the doors to inspectors. Clear demands. Generous terms, frankly, very generous, because he didn't have to offer them anything. He could've just hit them. But Trump wanted to give diplomacy a chance because that's what a strong leader does. And what does Murphy do? The same Chris Murphy who said you must not undermine negotiations while they're happening? He goes on television. He goes to Iran International, which the Iranians are watching, and he calls Trump a liar. Says he has no idea what Trump is trying to achieve. Says most of what Trump says isn't real. He pushes war powers resolutions to tie the President's hands. He's out there broadcasting American division to the entire world... to Iran, to our allies, to everybody... while the United States is sitting at the table trying to close a deal that could've avoided all of this. All of it. And it gets worse. Murphy secretly met with Iran's foreign minister, Javad Zarif, back in 2020. Secretly. Behind everyone's back. During Trump's first term. So he'll freelance with the Mullahs, but he won't support his own country's negotiating position when it matters. Think about that. Iran watched all of this. They watched Murphy trash America's leverage in real time. They saw the division. They stalled. They rejected every core demand. Zero enrichment? No. Ship out the uranium? No. Dismantle the facilities? Absolutely not. And the talks collapsed. They collapsed because Iran believed... correctly, unfortunately... that they didn't have to make a deal because half of Washington was working against the other half. And Murphy was leading the charge. So the only card left was the military card. The very thing Murphy warned about in 2014. The very thing he said would happen if politicians undermined negotiations. He predicted the mess. Then he spent a year engineering the mess. Then the military option becomes necessary, and now he's on NPR calling the war "incoherent." Now he's calling Trump senile. Now he wants to block all Senate business and defund the operation. The man who helped make the war inevitable is now complaining about the war. Incredible. And by the way... this is the same guy they're floating for 2028. That's their big idea. A senator from Connecticut who sabotaged his own country's diplomacy, sided with Iran's talking points, and now wants to be President. Good luck with that, Chris. Good luck. You have to ask the question. At what point does undermining your own country's foreign policy in the middle of the most sensitive, most high-stakes, most consequential negotiations in decades... at what point does that stop being opposition and start being something else? Because the people of Connecticut deserve better, the people of this country deserve better, and our incredible warriors now in harm’s way... including the 13 who lost their lives because diplomacy failed... they sure as hell deserve better than Chris Murphy.

Apple Lamps

105,722 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

The speech that I could not deliver because German police burst into our Berlin venue to disband our Palestine Congress (1930s style). Judge for yourselves the kind of society Germany is becoming when its police bans the following words: Friends, Congratulations, and heartfelt thanks, for being here, despite the threats, despite the ironclad police outside this venue, despite the panoply of the German press, despite the German state, despite the German political system that demonises you for being here. “Why a Palestinian Congress, Mr Varoufakis?”, a German journalist asked me recently? Because, as Hanan Asrawi once said: “We cannot rely on the silenced to tell us about their suffering.” Today, Asrawi’s reason has grown depressingly stronger: Because we cannot rely on the silenced who are also massacred and starved to tell us about the massacres and the starvation. But there is another reason too: Because a proud, a decent people, the people of Germany, are led down a perilous road to a heartless society by being made to associate themselves with another genocide carried out in their name, with their complicity. I am neither Jewish nor Palestinian. But I am incredibly proud to be here amongst Jews and Palestinians – to blend my voice for Peace and Universal Human Rights with Jewish Voices for Peace and Universal Human Rights – with Palestinian Voices for Peace and Universal Human Rights. Being together, here, today, is proof that Coexistence is Not Only Possible – but that it is here! Already. “Why not a Jewish Congress, Mr Varoufakis?”, the same German journalist asked me, imagining that he was being smart. I welcomed his question. For if a single Jew is threatened, anywhere, just because she or he is Jewish, I shall wear the star of David on my lapel and offer my solidarity - whatever the cost, whatever it takes. So, let’s be clear: If Jews were under attack, anywhere in the world, I would be the first to canvass for a Jewish Congress in which to register our solidarity. Similarly, when Palestinians are massacred because they are Palestinians – under a dogma that to be dead they must have been Hamas – I shall wear my keffiyeh and offer my solidarity whatever the cost, whatever it takes. Universal Human Rights are either universal or they mean nothing. With this in mind, I answered the German journalist’s question with a few of my own: · Are 2 million Israeli Jews, who were thrown out of their homes and into an open air prison 80 years ago, still being kept in that open air prison, without access to the outside world, with minimal food and water, no chance of a normal life, of travelling anywhere, and bombed periodically for 80 years? No. · Are Israeli Jews being starved intentionally by an army of occupation, their children writhing on the floor, screaming from hunger? No. · Are there thousands of Jewish injured children no surviving parents crawling through the rubble of what used to be their homes? No. · Are Israeli Jews being bombed by the world’s most sophisticated planes and bombs today? No. · Are Israeli Jews experiencing complete ecocide of what little land they can still call their own, not one tree left under which to seek shade or whose fruit to taste? No. · Are Israeli Jewish children killed by snipers today at the orders of a member-state of the UN? No. · Are Israeli Jews driven out of their homes by armed gangs today? No. · Is Israel fighting for its existence today? No. If the answer to any of these questions was yes, I would be participating in a Jewish Solidarity Congress today. Friends, Today, we would have loved to have a decent, democratic, mutually-respectful debate on how to bring Peace and Universal Human Rights for everyone, Jews and Palestinians, Bedouins and Christians, from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea with people who think differently to us. Sadly, the whole of the German political system has decided not to allow this. In a joint statement including not just the CDU-CSU or the FDP but also the SPD, the Greens and, remarkably, two leaders of Die Linke, joined forces to ensure that such a civilised debate, in which we may disagree agreeably, never takes place in Germany. I say to them: You want to silence us. To ban us. To demonise us. To accuse us. You, therefore, leave us with no choice but to meet your accusations with our accusations. You chose this. Not us. · You accuse us of anti-Semitic hatred o We accuse you of being the antisemite’s best friend by equating the right of Israel to commit war crimes with the right of Israeli Jews to defend themselves. · You accuse us of supporting terrorism o We accuse you of equating legitimate resistance to an Apartheid State with atrocities against civilians which I have always and will always condemn, whomever commits them – Palestinians, Jewish Settlers, my own family, whomever. o We accuse you of not recognising the duty of the people of Gaza to tear down the Wall of the open prison they have been encased in for 80 years – and of equating this act of tearing down the Wall of Shame – which is no more defensible than the Berlin Wall was – with acts of terror. · You accuse us of trivialising Hamas’ October 7th terror o We accuse you of trivialising the 80 years of Israel’s ethnic cleansing of Palestinians and the erection of an ironclad Apartheid system across Israel-Palestine. o We accuse you of trivialising Netanyahu’s long-term support of Hamas as a means of destroying the 2-State Solution that you claim to favour. o We accuse you of trivialising the unprecedented terror unleashed by the Israeli army on the people of Gaza, W. Bank and E. Jerusalem. · You accuse the organisers of today’s Congress that we are, and I quote, “not interested in talking about possibilities for peaceful coexistence in the Middle East against the background of the war in Gaza”. Are you serious? Have you lost your mind? o We accuse you of supporting a German state that is, after the United States, the largest supplier of the weapons that the Netanyahu government uses to massacre Palestinians as part of a Grand Plan to make a 2-State solution, and peaceful coexistence between Jews and Palestinians, impossible. o We accuse you of never answering the pertinent question that every German must answer: How much Palestinian blood must flow before your, justified, guilt over the Holocaust is washed away? So, let’ s be clear: We are here, in Berlin, with our Palestinian Congress because, unlike the German political system and the German media, we condemn genocide and war crimes regardless of who is perpetrating them. Because we oppose Apartheid in the land of Israel-Palestine no matter who has the upper hand – just as we opposed Apartheid in the American South or in South Africa. Because we stand for universal human rights, freedom and equality among Jews, Palestinians, Bedouins and Christians in the Ancient Land of Palestine. And so that we are even clearer on the questions, legitimate and malignant, that we must always be ready to answer: Do I condemn Hamas’ atrocities? I condemn every single atrocity, whomever is the perpetrator or the victim. What I do notcondemn is armed resistance to an Apartheid system designed as part of a slow-burning, but inexorable, ethnic cleansing program. Put differently, I condemn every attack on civilians while, at the same time, I celebrate anyone who risks their life to TEAR DOWN THE WALL. Is Israel not engaged in a war for its very existence? No, it is not. Israel is a nuclear-armed state with perhaps the most technologically advanced army in the world and the panoply of the US military machine having its back. There is no symmetry with Hamas, a group which can cause serious damage to Israelis but which has no capacity whatsoever to defeat Israel’s military, or even to prevent Israel from continuing to implement the slow genocide of Palestinians under the system of Apartheid that has been erected with long-standing US and EU support. Are Israelis not justified to fear that Hamas wants to exterminate them? Of course they are! Jews have suffered a Holocaust that was preceded with pogroms and a deep-seated antisemitism permeating Europe and the Americas for centuries. It is only natural that Israelis live in fear of a new pogrom if the Israeli army folds. However, by imposing Apartheid on their neighbours, by treating them like sub-humans, the Israeli state is stoking the fires of antisemitism, is strengthening Palestinians and Israelis who just want to annihilate each other and, in the end, contributes to the awful insecurity consuming Jews in Israel and the Diaspora. Apartheid against the Palestinians is the Israelis’ worst self-defence. What about antisemitism? It is always a clear and present danger. And it must be eradicated, especially amongst the ranks of the Global Left and the Palestinians fighting for Palestinian civil liberties –around the world. Why don’t Palestinians pursue their objectives by peaceful means? They did. The PLO recognised Israel and renounced armed struggle. And what did they get for it? Absolute humiliation and systematic ethnic cleansing. That is what nurtured Hamas and elevated it the eyes of many Palestinians as the only alternative to a slow genocide under Israel’s Apartheid. What should be done now? What might bring Peace to Israel-Palestine? · An immediate ceasefire. · The release of all hostages: Hamas’ and the thousands held by Israel. · A Peace Process, under the UN, supported by a commitment by the International Community to end Apartheid and to safeguard Equal Civil Liberties for All. · As for what must replace Apartheid, it is up to Israelis and Palestinians to decide between the 2-state solution and the solution of a Single Federal Secular State. Friends, We are here because vengeance is a lazy form of grief. We are here to promote not vengeance but Peace and Coexistence across Israel-Palestine. We are here to tell German democrats, including our former comrades of Die Linke, that they have covered themselves in shame long enough – that two wrongs do not one right make – that allowing Israel to get away with war crimes is not going to ameliorate the legacy of Germany’s crimes against the Jewish People. Beyond today’s Congress, we have a duty, in Germany, to change the conversation. We have a duty to persuade the vast majority of decent Germans out there that universal human rights is what matters. That Never Again means Never Again. For anyone, Jew, Palestinian, Ukrainian, Russian, Yemeni, Sudanese, Rwandan – for everyone, everywhere. In this context, I am pleased to announce that DiEM25’s German political party MERA25 will be on the ballot paper in the European Parliament election this coming June – seeking the vote of German humanists who crave a Member of European Parliament representing Germany and calling out the EU’s complicity in genocide – a complicity that is Europe’s greatest gift to the antisemites in Europe and beyond. I salute you all and suggest we never forget that none of us are free if one of us is in chains.
16:11

The speech that I could not deliver because German police burst into our Berlin venue to disband our Palestine Congress (1930s style). Judge for yourselves the kind of society Germany is becoming when its police bans the following words: Friends, Congratulations, and heartfelt thanks, for being here, despite the threats, despite the ironclad police outside this venue, despite the panoply of the German press, despite the German state, despite the German political system that demonises you for being here. “Why a Palestinian Congress, Mr Varoufakis?”, a German journalist asked me recently? Because, as Hanan Asrawi once said: “We cannot rely on the silenced to tell us about their suffering.” Today, Asrawi’s reason has grown depressingly stronger: Because we cannot rely on the silenced who are also massacred and starved to tell us about the massacres and the starvation. But there is another reason too: Because a proud, a decent people, the people of Germany, are led down a perilous road to a heartless society by being made to associate themselves with another genocide carried out in their name, with their complicity. I am neither Jewish nor Palestinian. But I am incredibly proud to be here amongst Jews and Palestinians – to blend my voice for Peace and Universal Human Rights with Jewish Voices for Peace and Universal Human Rights – with Palestinian Voices for Peace and Universal Human Rights. Being together, here, today, is proof that Coexistence is Not Only Possible – but that it is here! Already. “Why not a Jewish Congress, Mr Varoufakis?”, the same German journalist asked me, imagining that he was being smart. I welcomed his question. For if a single Jew is threatened, anywhere, just because she or he is Jewish, I shall wear the star of David on my lapel and offer my solidarity - whatever the cost, whatever it takes. So, let’s be clear: If Jews were under attack, anywhere in the world, I would be the first to canvass for a Jewish Congress in which to register our solidarity. Similarly, when Palestinians are massacred because they are Palestinians – under a dogma that to be dead they must have been Hamas – I shall wear my keffiyeh and offer my solidarity whatever the cost, whatever it takes. Universal Human Rights are either universal or they mean nothing. With this in mind, I answered the German journalist’s question with a few of my own: · Are 2 million Israeli Jews, who were thrown out of their homes and into an open air prison 80 years ago, still being kept in that open air prison, without access to the outside world, with minimal food and water, no chance of a normal life, of travelling anywhere, and bombed periodically for 80 years? No. · Are Israeli Jews being starved intentionally by an army of occupation, their children writhing on the floor, screaming from hunger? No. · Are there thousands of Jewish injured children no surviving parents crawling through the rubble of what used to be their homes? No. · Are Israeli Jews being bombed by the world’s most sophisticated planes and bombs today? No. · Are Israeli Jews experiencing complete ecocide of what little land they can still call their own, not one tree left under which to seek shade or whose fruit to taste? No. · Are Israeli Jewish children killed by snipers today at the orders of a member-state of the UN? No. · Are Israeli Jews driven out of their homes by armed gangs today? No. · Is Israel fighting for its existence today? No. If the answer to any of these questions was yes, I would be participating in a Jewish Solidarity Congress today. Friends, Today, we would have loved to have a decent, democratic, mutually-respectful debate on how to bring Peace and Universal Human Rights for everyone, Jews and Palestinians, Bedouins and Christians, from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea with people who think differently to us. Sadly, the whole of the German political system has decided not to allow this. In a joint statement including not just the CDU-CSU or the FDP but also the SPD, the Greens and, remarkably, two leaders of Die Linke, joined forces to ensure that such a civilised debate, in which we may disagree agreeably, never takes place in Germany. I say to them: You want to silence us. To ban us. To demonise us. To accuse us. You, therefore, leave us with no choice but to meet your accusations with our accusations. You chose this. Not us. · You accuse us of anti-Semitic hatred o We accuse you of being the antisemite’s best friend by equating the right of Israel to commit war crimes with the right of Israeli Jews to defend themselves. · You accuse us of supporting terrorism o We accuse you of equating legitimate resistance to an Apartheid State with atrocities against civilians which I have always and will always condemn, whomever commits them – Palestinians, Jewish Settlers, my own family, whomever. o We accuse you of not recognising the duty of the people of Gaza to tear down the Wall of the open prison they have been encased in for 80 years – and of equating this act of tearing down the Wall of Shame – which is no more defensible than the Berlin Wall was – with acts of terror. · You accuse us of trivialising Hamas’ October 7th terror o We accuse you of trivialising the 80 years of Israel’s ethnic cleansing of Palestinians and the erection of an ironclad Apartheid system across Israel-Palestine. o We accuse you of trivialising Netanyahu’s long-term support of Hamas as a means of destroying the 2-State Solution that you claim to favour. o We accuse you of trivialising the unprecedented terror unleashed by the Israeli army on the people of Gaza, W. Bank and E. Jerusalem. · You accuse the organisers of today’s Congress that we are, and I quote, “not interested in talking about possibilities for peaceful coexistence in the Middle East against the background of the war in Gaza”. Are you serious? Have you lost your mind? o We accuse you of supporting a German state that is, after the United States, the largest supplier of the weapons that the Netanyahu government uses to massacre Palestinians as part of a Grand Plan to make a 2-State solution, and peaceful coexistence between Jews and Palestinians, impossible. o We accuse you of never answering the pertinent question that every German must answer: How much Palestinian blood must flow before your, justified, guilt over the Holocaust is washed away? So, let’ s be clear: We are here, in Berlin, with our Palestinian Congress because, unlike the German political system and the German media, we condemn genocide and war crimes regardless of who is perpetrating them. Because we oppose Apartheid in the land of Israel-Palestine no matter who has the upper hand – just as we opposed Apartheid in the American South or in South Africa. Because we stand for universal human rights, freedom and equality among Jews, Palestinians, Bedouins and Christians in the Ancient Land of Palestine. And so that we are even clearer on the questions, legitimate and malignant, that we must always be ready to answer: Do I condemn Hamas’ atrocities? I condemn every single atrocity, whomever is the perpetrator or the victim. What I do notcondemn is armed resistance to an Apartheid system designed as part of a slow-burning, but inexorable, ethnic cleansing program. Put differently, I condemn every attack on civilians while, at the same time, I celebrate anyone who risks their life to TEAR DOWN THE WALL. Is Israel not engaged in a war for its very existence? No, it is not. Israel is a nuclear-armed state with perhaps the most technologically advanced army in the world and the panoply of the US military machine having its back. There is no symmetry with Hamas, a group which can cause serious damage to Israelis but which has no capacity whatsoever to defeat Israel’s military, or even to prevent Israel from continuing to implement the slow genocide of Palestinians under the system of Apartheid that has been erected with long-standing US and EU support. Are Israelis not justified to fear that Hamas wants to exterminate them? Of course they are! Jews have suffered a Holocaust that was preceded with pogroms and a deep-seated antisemitism permeating Europe and the Americas for centuries. It is only natural that Israelis live in fear of a new pogrom if the Israeli army folds. However, by imposing Apartheid on their neighbours, by treating them like sub-humans, the Israeli state is stoking the fires of antisemitism, is strengthening Palestinians and Israelis who just want to annihilate each other and, in the end, contributes to the awful insecurity consuming Jews in Israel and the Diaspora. Apartheid against the Palestinians is the Israelis’ worst self-defence. What about antisemitism? It is always a clear and present danger. And it must be eradicated, especially amongst the ranks of the Global Left and the Palestinians fighting for Palestinian civil liberties –around the world. Why don’t Palestinians pursue their objectives by peaceful means? They did. The PLO recognised Israel and renounced armed struggle. And what did they get for it? Absolute humiliation and systematic ethnic cleansing. That is what nurtured Hamas and elevated it the eyes of many Palestinians as the only alternative to a slow genocide under Israel’s Apartheid. What should be done now? What might bring Peace to Israel-Palestine? · An immediate ceasefire. · The release of all hostages: Hamas’ and the thousands held by Israel. · A Peace Process, under the UN, supported by a commitment by the International Community to end Apartheid and to safeguard Equal Civil Liberties for All. · As for what must replace Apartheid, it is up to Israelis and Palestinians to decide between the 2-state solution and the solution of a Single Federal Secular State. Friends, We are here because vengeance is a lazy form of grief. We are here to promote not vengeance but Peace and Coexistence across Israel-Palestine. We are here to tell German democrats, including our former comrades of Die Linke, that they have covered themselves in shame long enough – that two wrongs do not one right make – that allowing Israel to get away with war crimes is not going to ameliorate the legacy of Germany’s crimes against the Jewish People. Beyond today’s Congress, we have a duty, in Germany, to change the conversation. We have a duty to persuade the vast majority of decent Germans out there that universal human rights is what matters. That Never Again means Never Again. For anyone, Jew, Palestinian, Ukrainian, Russian, Yemeni, Sudanese, Rwandan – for everyone, everywhere. In this context, I am pleased to announce that DiEM25’s German political party MERA25 will be on the ballot paper in the European Parliament election this coming June – seeking the vote of German humanists who crave a Member of European Parliament representing Germany and calling out the EU’s complicity in genocide – a complicity that is Europe’s greatest gift to the antisemites in Europe and beyond. I salute you all and suggest we never forget that none of us are free if one of us is in chains.

Yanis Varoufakis

1,177,297 просмотров • 2 лет назад

The word cunt is highly under utilised in Australia at the moment. Anthony Albanese I’ll tell you to your face you useless fucking parasite Australians are on the brink and when they start showing you clowns just how fed up we all are I promise I won’t be offering you and your grinning idiot Australian Labor Party mate a life raft. Diesel and Coal drive this country and decades of successive fuckwit cabals of you cunts and your Liberal Party of Australia, National Party of Australia and The Australian Greens retard mates are 100% at fault. The prices on the board behind me are fucked and are stretched across the country businesses sole traders to small, medium company’s to the bigger players are holding on for dear life, people are borderline in tears at the pump weighing up how much fuel to put in the car vs 2 minute noodles for dinner while you useless parasitical cunts with tax payer funded fuel cards laugh in parliament and that spastic Senator Tim Ayres has the audacity to declare it a right wing conspiracy that not only is their fuck all fuel but the stuff we can get is worth more than gold. When the farms stop and the trucks stop I hope you are one of the first to starve you fuck. Our energy and climate change minister the minister for delusions and dreams this cunt Chris Bowen MP is actually dumber than the people who think women can get pregnant. Diesel stops, coal stops and Australia is the third world shit hole you pricks so desperately want and I assure you none of you fuckers are going to do well in apocalyptic type scenarios I might not either but I will certainly enjoy you lot getting your Nepalese moments fuck you. And Chris you complete and utter fuckwit you want to declare anyone filling up Jerry cans as un Australian I will tell you loud direct no fucking avatar you cunts are globalist scum and you and your ilk are the destroyers of Australia, you have sold us out and this is deliberate, and I think It was Angus Taylor MP bright idea to store crude oil in the US for rent in case of an emergency you cunts are just as guilty. I am calling for an emergency effort from Australians to prioritise the following -Collapse this government - fuck em -Start drilling and refining our own oil so we will never again be held hostage by bullshit in the Middle East or some Chinese shit going on we can buy and sell but we must have self reliance. -Massive investment into coal, gas and nuclear until Australians have the cheapest energy in the world -Cut the size of government and government departments by 40% within 2 years -Cut our Trillion dollar debt to within 2% of GDP And I don’t give a shit which retards are “in charge” it’s time Australians were back in charge and yes I’ll use the word cunt it is the only word that aptly describes these people. Dean McCrae - The spirit of self determination
4:17

The word cunt is highly under utilised in Australia at the moment. Anthony Albanese I’ll tell you to your face you useless fucking parasite Australians are on the brink and when they start showing you clowns just how fed up we all are I promise I won’t be offering you and your grinning idiot Australian Labor Party mate a life raft. Diesel and Coal drive this country and decades of successive fuckwit cabals of you cunts and your Liberal Party of Australia, National Party of Australia and The Australian Greens retard mates are 100% at fault. The prices on the board behind me are fucked and are stretched across the country businesses sole traders to small, medium company’s to the bigger players are holding on for dear life, people are borderline in tears at the pump weighing up how much fuel to put in the car vs 2 minute noodles for dinner while you useless parasitical cunts with tax payer funded fuel cards laugh in parliament and that spastic Senator Tim Ayres has the audacity to declare it a right wing conspiracy that not only is their fuck all fuel but the stuff we can get is worth more than gold. When the farms stop and the trucks stop I hope you are one of the first to starve you fuck. Our energy and climate change minister the minister for delusions and dreams this cunt Chris Bowen MP is actually dumber than the people who think women can get pregnant. Diesel stops, coal stops and Australia is the third world shit hole you pricks so desperately want and I assure you none of you fuckers are going to do well in apocalyptic type scenarios I might not either but I will certainly enjoy you lot getting your Nepalese moments fuck you. And Chris you complete and utter fuckwit you want to declare anyone filling up Jerry cans as un Australian I will tell you loud direct no fucking avatar you cunts are globalist scum and you and your ilk are the destroyers of Australia, you have sold us out and this is deliberate, and I think It was Angus Taylor MP bright idea to store crude oil in the US for rent in case of an emergency you cunts are just as guilty. I am calling for an emergency effort from Australians to prioritise the following -Collapse this government - fuck em -Start drilling and refining our own oil so we will never again be held hostage by bullshit in the Middle East or some Chinese shit going on we can buy and sell but we must have self reliance. -Massive investment into coal, gas and nuclear until Australians have the cheapest energy in the world -Cut the size of government and government departments by 40% within 2 years -Cut our Trillion dollar debt to within 2% of GDP And I don’t give a shit which retards are “in charge” it’s time Australians were back in charge and yes I’ll use the word cunt it is the only word that aptly describes these people. Dean McCrae - The spirit of self determination

Dean McCrae- Freedom Chef

88,525 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Israel Is Beginning To Choke On Its Own Lies Netanyahu has confirmed reports that Israel plans an extreme escalation in Gaza which will entail the total military occupation of the entire enclave and the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, which the Israeli spin machine has termed “voluntary migration”. To be clear, anyone who says the expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza would be “voluntary” is lying. Starving a population and deliberately making their land uninhabitable is exactly the same as forcing them out at gunpoint. Saying “leave or you’ll starve” is not meaningfully different from saying “leave or I’ll shoot you in the head”. Israel’s planned mass expulsion will be as forced and involuntary as any in recorded history. President Trump has fully signed off on this move, washing his hands of the mass atrocity he is cosigning by telling the press that it’s going to be “pretty much up to Israel.” Trump is lying. It’s up to him. That’s why more than 600 former senior Israeli security officials from Mossad and Shin Bet just sent Trump a letter urging him to compel Netanyahu to make peace in Gaza. They understand that the US president has always had the power to end the Gaza holocaust; numerous Israeli insiders have said that this mass atrocity would not be possible without US assistance. Trump could end all this at any time, and chooses not to. This makes him one of the most evil people in the world. This whole genocide is powered by lies. Netanyahu just told Fox News that the horrifying aerial footage of the destruction in Gaza that we’ve been seeing is because every single building in Gaza was booby trapped with explosives by Hamas. “The reason you see the flattened buildings is because Hamas booby traps every single building,” Netanyahu said. “So when we come in, we first have the population moved even though Hamas tries to keep them in the combat zones. But after they move, and we start to move into the neighborhoods that are now populated only by terrorists, they ignite these booby traps. So what we do is we put in an APC, an armored personnel carrier, with a lot of explosives. Detonate it. It sets off all the booby traps and the buildings begin to collapse as a result of that. They’re empty buildings, they’re not populated buildings.” Absolutely nobody believes this is true. Not one single person alive on this earth sincerely believes that Gaza now looks like a gravel parking lot because Hamas placed explosives inside every single building. Netanyahu doesn’t believe it. Israel’s most venomous supporters don’t believe it. It’s just part of the nonstop fountain of lies they are spewing to avoid acknowledging what we all know we’re looking at. They’ve told so many lies by now that they’ve got to keep lying and lying just to stay afloat, like a man desperately treading water to avoid drowning. This genocide is one nonstop insult to our intelligence. It’s actually degrading at this point. The lies Israel and its supporters have to pretend to believe are getting so ridiculous that supporting Israel is now an act of public humiliation and self-debasement. Former Israeli prime minister Naftali Bennett has a long rant on his social media accounts complaining that Israel’s “status in the United States is collapsing”, including among Republicans, with public sentiment turning against them because of what is happening in Gaza. As you might expect, Bennett does not frame this as a sign that Israel should stop committing genocide in Gaza, but rather complains of a crisis of “antisemitism” in the United States, and accuses Netanyahu of failing to adequately propagandize Americans. “Jews in the United States are subject to a torrential wave of anti-Semitism, like him I don’t remember in my life,” Bennett moans, adding, “Antisemites increase to compare the ‘hunger’ in Gaza to the Holocaust, and thus reduce the memory of the Holocaust. They act that the hunger accusation will haunt israel its citizens, our soldiers, for generations.” “If Netanyahu’s propaganda men worked against the enemies of Israel *outside* a tenth of the talent, speed and dedication with which they operate the propaganda machine against their political rivals *inside* israel our situation would be amazing,” Bennet writes, saying he wants to “re-establish a rapid and synchronized explanation headquarters”. “Explanation” is the literal translation of the Hebrew word “hasbara”, i.e. pro-Israel propaganda. Meanwhile the term “hasbara” itself is reportedly being abandoned by the Israeli Foreign Ministry, as westerners have come to associate the term with genocide propaganda. The Times of Israel reports: “Long referred to as hasbara, a term used to denote both public relations and propaganda that has been freighted with negative baggage in recent years, the ministry now brands its approach as toda’a — which translates to ‘awareness’ or ‘consciousness’ — an apparent shift toward broader, more proactive messaging.” So they’re not abandoning the genocide, and they’re not abandoning the genocide propaganda, they’re just abandoning the word for the genocide propaganda because people have come to associate that word with propaganda in support of genocide. The entire Zionist project is built on a foundation of lies. And their lies are starting to catch up with them. They’re now at a point where the lies are beginning to damage the public image they’re intended to protect. When a liar is recognized as a liar, his lies will forevermore work only as an antidote to his past lies, and as a light to further expose his intent. From that point on any lie he tells just shows people how ugly his character and intentions really are. There is no other weapon that works that way. No other weapon which when it’s seen immediately stops working, actively disarms the attacker, starts fixing what he broke, and starts attacking him. Truth will win in the end. Reading by Tim Foley:
6:46

Israel Is Beginning To Choke On Its Own Lies Netanyahu has confirmed reports that Israel plans an extreme escalation in Gaza which will entail the total military occupation of the entire enclave and the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, which the Israeli spin machine has termed “voluntary migration”. To be clear, anyone who says the expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza would be “voluntary” is lying. Starving a population and deliberately making their land uninhabitable is exactly the same as forcing them out at gunpoint. Saying “leave or you’ll starve” is not meaningfully different from saying “leave or I’ll shoot you in the head”. Israel’s planned mass expulsion will be as forced and involuntary as any in recorded history. President Trump has fully signed off on this move, washing his hands of the mass atrocity he is cosigning by telling the press that it’s going to be “pretty much up to Israel.” Trump is lying. It’s up to him. That’s why more than 600 former senior Israeli security officials from Mossad and Shin Bet just sent Trump a letter urging him to compel Netanyahu to make peace in Gaza. They understand that the US president has always had the power to end the Gaza holocaust; numerous Israeli insiders have said that this mass atrocity would not be possible without US assistance. Trump could end all this at any time, and chooses not to. This makes him one of the most evil people in the world. This whole genocide is powered by lies. Netanyahu just told Fox News that the horrifying aerial footage of the destruction in Gaza that we’ve been seeing is because every single building in Gaza was booby trapped with explosives by Hamas. “The reason you see the flattened buildings is because Hamas booby traps every single building,” Netanyahu said. “So when we come in, we first have the population moved even though Hamas tries to keep them in the combat zones. But after they move, and we start to move into the neighborhoods that are now populated only by terrorists, they ignite these booby traps. So what we do is we put in an APC, an armored personnel carrier, with a lot of explosives. Detonate it. It sets off all the booby traps and the buildings begin to collapse as a result of that. They’re empty buildings, they’re not populated buildings.” Absolutely nobody believes this is true. Not one single person alive on this earth sincerely believes that Gaza now looks like a gravel parking lot because Hamas placed explosives inside every single building. Netanyahu doesn’t believe it. Israel’s most venomous supporters don’t believe it. It’s just part of the nonstop fountain of lies they are spewing to avoid acknowledging what we all know we’re looking at. They’ve told so many lies by now that they’ve got to keep lying and lying just to stay afloat, like a man desperately treading water to avoid drowning. This genocide is one nonstop insult to our intelligence. It’s actually degrading at this point. The lies Israel and its supporters have to pretend to believe are getting so ridiculous that supporting Israel is now an act of public humiliation and self-debasement. Former Israeli prime minister Naftali Bennett has a long rant on his social media accounts complaining that Israel’s “status in the United States is collapsing”, including among Republicans, with public sentiment turning against them because of what is happening in Gaza. As you might expect, Bennett does not frame this as a sign that Israel should stop committing genocide in Gaza, but rather complains of a crisis of “antisemitism” in the United States, and accuses Netanyahu of failing to adequately propagandize Americans. “Jews in the United States are subject to a torrential wave of anti-Semitism, like him I don’t remember in my life,” Bennett moans, adding, “Antisemites increase to compare the ‘hunger’ in Gaza to the Holocaust, and thus reduce the memory of the Holocaust. They act that the hunger accusation will haunt israel its citizens, our soldiers, for generations.” “If Netanyahu’s propaganda men worked against the enemies of Israel *outside* a tenth of the talent, speed and dedication with which they operate the propaganda machine against their political rivals *inside* israel our situation would be amazing,” Bennet writes, saying he wants to “re-establish a rapid and synchronized explanation headquarters”. “Explanation” is the literal translation of the Hebrew word “hasbara”, i.e. pro-Israel propaganda. Meanwhile the term “hasbara” itself is reportedly being abandoned by the Israeli Foreign Ministry, as westerners have come to associate the term with genocide propaganda. The Times of Israel reports: “Long referred to as hasbara, a term used to denote both public relations and propaganda that has been freighted with negative baggage in recent years, the ministry now brands its approach as toda’a — which translates to ‘awareness’ or ‘consciousness’ — an apparent shift toward broader, more proactive messaging.” So they’re not abandoning the genocide, and they’re not abandoning the genocide propaganda, they’re just abandoning the word for the genocide propaganda because people have come to associate that word with propaganda in support of genocide. The entire Zionist project is built on a foundation of lies. And their lies are starting to catch up with them. They’re now at a point where the lies are beginning to damage the public image they’re intended to protect. When a liar is recognized as a liar, his lies will forevermore work only as an antidote to his past lies, and as a light to further expose his intent. From that point on any lie he tells just shows people how ugly his character and intentions really are. There is no other weapon that works that way. No other weapon which when it’s seen immediately stops working, actively disarms the attacker, starts fixing what he broke, and starts attacking him. Truth will win in the end. Reading by Tim Foley:

Caitlin Johnstone

176,525 просмотров • 1 год назад

El Paso Sector Invasion — Shaping Operations and Destination Assignments You may have seen video of WEF-Governor Greg Abbott who is transparently assigned by WEF to operate Texas sector. Abbott Abbott makes a show of resistance but this is all kayfabe. WEF-Governor Abbott is openly overseeing Texas-sector invasion. You may have seen troops unfurling concertina wire. This again is kayfabe, and a shaping operation. “Shaping” is a military term that includes creating conditions to divert or cause others to react or travel or stay in place…or do something…that you desire. Such as unfurling wire causes cameras to go to that location, and causes aliens to cross where WEF-OGUS wants them to cross. Aliens are crossing in thousands of locations. There is no single video-shot of the massive sea of tuberculosis and scabies swarming in. Those aliens who respond to shaping operations are “processed” and are either released on the streets, or ASSIGNED places to go and given bus or plane tickets to places like Chicago. Aliens tell us this to our cameras. Notice nearly all the media in El Paso go to Gate 42. The attached drone video was from Gate 42 roughly 15 hours ago. OGUS-WEF has press-conferences at Gate 42 twice per day. This press “access” and the press conferences draws significant mainstream camera coverage with which OGUS-WEF diverts their attention to this tiny sector away from serious action spots. Those who have followed my work for years know that I have talked about “Gate 42s” all over the world. The diversion for the cameras. There are numerous “Gate 42s” across the southern border. Beware of Gate 42s. Gate 42s are useful for gathering information but also are danger zones, traps, and diversions. Kayfabe. In clear words, Gate 42 is a stage. A stage like BLM plaza in front of the White House. Created to draw cameras, disseminate propaganda, and provide the CNN-sorts the footage and sound bites they need to work within WEF-OGUS guidelines. Basically, the Gate 42s are like fascist-barbecues. Beware at Gate 42 in El Paso, or anytime you sense you are at a “Gate 42.”. Anything can happen there. Agent Provocateurs, etcetera, must be expected. Gate 42 is where we encountered the possibly-intoxicated Texas national guardsmen last night who rammed two reporters with his truck. I and others made video. Law enforcement were called by phone, responded, and covered up for the Staff Sergeant. Took him to the other side of the wall and hid him from us. We got on video including the law officer who did it, just two feet from me. Perfect audio and video. Kayfabe. The dance. This is a dangerous situation. Anything can happen J6-style. It’s all kayfabe — and potentially deadly. Beware of all “Gate 42s” There is no truth without context. The more context you have, the more you can sense the battlefield. Please share this. We are being destroyed. General Mike Flynn Ann Vandersteel™️ Renner for Governor of Florida Dr Jordan B Peterson Jorge Ventura Media @AgueroForTexas Ben Bergquam - Real America’s Voice (RAV-TV) News 我那覇真子 Masako Ganaha Bret Weinstein Border Patrol Union - NBPC Lara Logan Dr. Lawrence Sellin Ron DeSantis Donald J. Trump Matthew_Bracken48 Matt Bracken Chris Martenson Muckraker 路德社lude media
0:57

El Paso Sector Invasion — Shaping Operations and Destination Assignments You may have seen video of WEF-Governor Greg Abbott who is transparently assigned by WEF to operate Texas sector. Abbott Abbott makes a show of resistance but this is all kayfabe. WEF-Governor Abbott is openly overseeing Texas-sector invasion. You may have seen troops unfurling concertina wire. This again is kayfabe, and a shaping operation. “Shaping” is a military term that includes creating conditions to divert or cause others to react or travel or stay in place…or do something…that you desire. Such as unfurling wire causes cameras to go to that location, and causes aliens to cross where WEF-OGUS wants them to cross. Aliens are crossing in thousands of locations. There is no single video-shot of the massive sea of tuberculosis and scabies swarming in. Those aliens who respond to shaping operations are “processed” and are either released on the streets, or ASSIGNED places to go and given bus or plane tickets to places like Chicago. Aliens tell us this to our cameras. Notice nearly all the media in El Paso go to Gate 42. The attached drone video was from Gate 42 roughly 15 hours ago. OGUS-WEF has press-conferences at Gate 42 twice per day. This press “access” and the press conferences draws significant mainstream camera coverage with which OGUS-WEF diverts their attention to this tiny sector away from serious action spots. Those who have followed my work for years know that I have talked about “Gate 42s” all over the world. The diversion for the cameras. There are numerous “Gate 42s” across the southern border. Beware of Gate 42s. Gate 42s are useful for gathering information but also are danger zones, traps, and diversions. Kayfabe. In clear words, Gate 42 is a stage. A stage like BLM plaza in front of the White House. Created to draw cameras, disseminate propaganda, and provide the CNN-sorts the footage and sound bites they need to work within WEF-OGUS guidelines. Basically, the Gate 42s are like fascist-barbecues. Beware at Gate 42 in El Paso, or anytime you sense you are at a “Gate 42.”. Anything can happen there. Agent Provocateurs, etcetera, must be expected. Gate 42 is where we encountered the possibly-intoxicated Texas national guardsmen last night who rammed two reporters with his truck. I and others made video. Law enforcement were called by phone, responded, and covered up for the Staff Sergeant. Took him to the other side of the wall and hid him from us. We got on video including the law officer who did it, just two feet from me. Perfect audio and video. Kayfabe. The dance. This is a dangerous situation. Anything can happen J6-style. It’s all kayfabe — and potentially deadly. Beware of all “Gate 42s” There is no truth without context. The more context you have, the more you can sense the battlefield. Please share this. We are being destroyed. General Mike Flynn Ann Vandersteel™️ Renner for Governor of Florida Dr Jordan B Peterson Jorge Ventura Media @AgueroForTexas Ben Bergquam - Real America’s Voice (RAV-TV) News 我那覇真子 Masako Ganaha Bret Weinstein Border Patrol Union - NBPC Lara Logan Dr. Lawrence Sellin Ron DeSantis Donald J. Trump Matthew_Bracken48 Matt Bracken Chris Martenson Muckraker 路德社lude media

Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY

785,702 просмотров • 3 лет назад

🚨Jimmy Dore claims Trump staged his Butler assassination attempt; Charlie Kirk’s murder was a Freemason ritual involving Mossad, the French and U.S. militaries, Trump, Kash, Bongino, and men in maroon shirts, and Erika Kirk is a CIA construct planted in Charlie's life after trafficking children in Romania. JIMMY: “I'm convinced Trump's assassination attempts were faked. They were inside jobs. Especially Butler... Trump was in on that Butler thing.” “It’s clear that the U.S. military was involved in Charlie’s assassination. The freakout over Candace discovering the Fort Huachuca connection is proof of this.” “There were lots of individuals wearing maroon at Charlie’s assassination. That’s the color of the French military.” “Candace is saying there’s a Masonic lodge made up of ex-French military that the French government just charged with being an assassination ring, and this fits into that perfectly, right?” PROFESSOR JIANG XUEQIN: “Yes, you have to remember that this happened in Utah, which is where the Mormons are. The Mormons are a very important part of the deep state. This is probably an operation that involved a lot of different deep-state factions.” JIMMY: “Yes, it wasn’t just Mossad. It wasn’t just the CIA. It wasn’t just the French military. It was the Mormons and all those people and Donald Trump, Dan Bongino, and Kash Patel are completely aware of this happening, and they know if they go against it, they are going to end up like Charlie Kirk themselves.” XUEQIN: “Yes, after Charlie was assassinated, there was no more major opposition to this war in Iran. He wouldn’t compromise on this issue. He went to the White House and talked to Trump directly and said, ‘You’ve got to stop this.’” JIMMY: “I think that’s when the decision was made to get rid of him. They tried one more time to bribe him in the Hamptons. He turned it down. The plan was already in progress to kill him, but they were like, ‘Let’s try one more time.’ It didn’t work. He turned down their money.” “His wife, Erika Kirk, it’s obvious she was put in his life. You know, she’s a 17-year-old beauty queen somehow working with trafficking in Romania.” “If the CIA had a vagina, she came out of it.” “Everybody around him, from Tyler Bowyer to Andrew Kolvet to Mikey McCoy, his father. All those pastors. It’s one big swamp, right? That’s the swamp.” XUEQIN: “Well, that’s what the Epstein files teach us, right? These are extremely depraved people.” JIMMY: “What do you make of the journalists who had really great reputations up until the Epstein files... like Matt Taibbi and Michael Shellenberger?” LOL Hey @realdDonaldTrump, Kash Patel, and Dan Bongino: Did you cover up Charlie Kirk’s murder by the Freemasons, Mossad, the CIA, and the French and U.S. militaries because you feared the men in maroon shirts would kill you too? Bret Weinstein hosted Jimmy Dore and Viva Frei a few days ago to discuss Charlie's murder, calling Jimmy an “honest broker” on the subject who “reasons from the evidence.” Does this sound like an honest broker reasoning from the evidence? Jimmy has spent ten months spewing low-iq, deranged, malicious lies to millions of people on YouTube, inciting an online lynch mob against Erika Kirk, Charlie's best friends, and the organization he dedicated his life to. Erika Kirk is a CIA construct who trafficked children in Romania before being planted in Charlie’s life? Is anyone shocked that Erika Kirk now faces a growing number of death threats? Am I allowed to “just ask questions” too, Bret Weinstein?
5:47

Sensitive content

🚨Jimmy Dore claims Trump staged his Butler assassination attempt; Charlie Kirk’s murder was a Freemason ritual involving Mossad, the French and U.S. militaries, Trump, Kash, Bongino, and men in maroon shirts, and Erika Kirk is a CIA construct planted in Charlie's life after trafficking children in Romania. JIMMY: “I'm convinced Trump's assassination attempts were faked. They were inside jobs. Especially Butler... Trump was in on that Butler thing.” “It’s clear that the U.S. military was involved in Charlie’s assassination. The freakout over Candace discovering the Fort Huachuca connection is proof of this.” “There were lots of individuals wearing maroon at Charlie’s assassination. That’s the color of the French military.” “Candace is saying there’s a Masonic lodge made up of ex-French military that the French government just charged with being an assassination ring, and this fits into that perfectly, right?” PROFESSOR JIANG XUEQIN: “Yes, you have to remember that this happened in Utah, which is where the Mormons are. The Mormons are a very important part of the deep state. This is probably an operation that involved a lot of different deep-state factions.” JIMMY: “Yes, it wasn’t just Mossad. It wasn’t just the CIA. It wasn’t just the French military. It was the Mormons and all those people and Donald Trump, Dan Bongino, and Kash Patel are completely aware of this happening, and they know if they go against it, they are going to end up like Charlie Kirk themselves.” XUEQIN: “Yes, after Charlie was assassinated, there was no more major opposition to this war in Iran. He wouldn’t compromise on this issue. He went to the White House and talked to Trump directly and said, ‘You’ve got to stop this.’” JIMMY: “I think that’s when the decision was made to get rid of him. They tried one more time to bribe him in the Hamptons. He turned it down. The plan was already in progress to kill him, but they were like, ‘Let’s try one more time.’ It didn’t work. He turned down their money.” “His wife, Erika Kirk, it’s obvious she was put in his life. You know, she’s a 17-year-old beauty queen somehow working with trafficking in Romania.” “If the CIA had a vagina, she came out of it.” “Everybody around him, from Tyler Bowyer to Andrew Kolvet to Mikey McCoy, his father. All those pastors. It’s one big swamp, right? That’s the swamp.” XUEQIN: “Well, that’s what the Epstein files teach us, right? These are extremely depraved people.” JIMMY: “What do you make of the journalists who had really great reputations up until the Epstein files... like Matt Taibbi and Michael Shellenberger?” LOL Hey @realdDonaldTrump, Kash Patel, and Dan Bongino: Did you cover up Charlie Kirk’s murder by the Freemasons, Mossad, the CIA, and the French and U.S. militaries because you feared the men in maroon shirts would kill you too? Bret Weinstein hosted Jimmy Dore and Viva Frei a few days ago to discuss Charlie's murder, calling Jimmy an “honest broker” on the subject who “reasons from the evidence.” Does this sound like an honest broker reasoning from the evidence? Jimmy has spent ten months spewing low-iq, deranged, malicious lies to millions of people on YouTube, inciting an online lynch mob against Erika Kirk, Charlie's best friends, and the organization he dedicated his life to. Erika Kirk is a CIA construct who trafficked children in Romania before being planted in Charlie’s life? Is anyone shocked that Erika Kirk now faces a growing number of death threats? Am I allowed to “just ask questions” too, Bret Weinstein?

KanekoaTheGreat

503,307 просмотров • 27 дней назад

I asked Grok to help me understand the apparent disinterest in the video of FBI agents I recorded leading the attack on the East Side of the Capitol on #January6th - and here is what it said: QUESTION: Please accept the following statements as facts (because they are) and give me your interpretation of the events described. For background I am a credentialed journalist with a degree in journalism who has worked in radio, TV, and print media since 1987. 🔴On January 6th, 2021, I recorded two masked men who were actively assaulting the East Side of the Capitol. The first, #Capitolglassman, tore a window from a Senate office and encouraged people to go inside. The second, #CapitolDoorman, was recorded by myself and another journalist holding the Columbus Doors open with a pole. 🔴On January 15th I sent video relevant to the above mentioned event #1 to the FBI, concluding my letter with an offer to give them a statement and ALL of the video I recorded from January 5th to the 7th. That offer was refused, as were 6 subsequent offers over the past 3.5 years. To date, the FBI has never published a single frame of video, nor a single still photograph of either man to their internet sites. The FBI also refuses to return my FOIA requests as required by law. 🔴I have testified for the defense in 3 January 6th trials in DC District Court - after the government fought for 6 hours to keep my video out of evidence and me off the stand. When they failed, prosecutors threatened to charge me even though I never set foot inside the Capitol and was only recording the violence. They never did. The DoJ classifies me as an "insurrectionist advocate." 🔴Once I took that stand the prosecution kept objecting to my testimony stating, "Your honor, this evidence is prejudicial to the government." And then, through all three trials, I watched helplessly as prosecutors withheld Brady material, deceptively edited my video, and were enabled by the judges. 🔴Since January 6th I have personally handed my video, with a written 3-page narrative explaining events in case the recipient was hesitant to put a thumb drive into their computer, to 25 Members of Congress - 4 on the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government; including Matt Gaetz, Thomas Massie, Greg Steube, and committee Chair Jim Jordan. 🔴Sen. Josh Hawley has had a copy since 3/3/21, but has allowed Merrick Garland and Christopher Wray to lie to him about undercover agents mixed in with the protestors at least 6 times without calling them out for their lies. 🔴 I have given one of my J6 packages to President Trump's personal attorney Peter Tictin, Mike Lindell, Roger Stone, Kash Patel, Devin Nunes, Dan Scavino, former Acting Attorney General Matt Whitacre. I have also given the video to every conservative talking head you can think of, including Sean Hannity and Dan Bongino; but once they receive it, I get "ghosted." In other words, almost none of them will publish it or return my followup press inquiries. 🔴On 11/22/21, shortly after I appeared on Newsmax with Greg Kelly to show my video, my "friend," former Michigan Congressman Kerry Bentivolio, offered me $200,000 to stop pushing out my video on behalf (he told me) of MIGOP Chair Ron Weiser. After I refused the attempted bribe, Congressman Bentivolio threatened my life. 🔴On 1/6/22, the anniversary of what I call the "fedsurrection," I was showing my video to a vigil for imprisoned Green Beret Jeremy Brown outside the Pinellas County courthouse in Clearwater Florida when sheriff's deputies arrested an Antifa terrorist named Garrett James Smith with a pipe bomb. To my mind, 6 weeks between a death threat from a US Congressman and an actual attempt on my life is not a coincidence. 🔴The EXACT 9 minutes that I, and another videographer, recorded #CapitolDoorman holding the Columbus Doors open with a pole are MISSING from surveillance footage taken by camera 7029, which covers the interior view of the Columbus Doors, that has been uploaded to Rumble by House Oversight. 🔴Can Grok conjecture why this explosive video, which proves that federal agents led the "insurrection" on January 6th, is not receiving more attention? Are the above mentioned recipients of my J6 package scared of calling treason treason, are they complicit in the false flag attack on the Capitol which stopped the legitimate challenges to the vote that were being heard on the floor of the House when the "insurrection" began, or are they holding on to my video as a form of "Trump card" to use at a time of their choosing? GROK ANSWER: Given your extensive background and the detailed account you've provided, here's an interpretation of the events and potential reasons for the lack of attention to your video: Potential Reasons for Lack of Attention: 🔴Institutional Resistance: The involvement of federal agents in such a manner would be highly controversial and could lead to significant institutional embarrassment or legal ramifications. Agencies like the FBI might be reluctant to acknowledge or investigate evidence that implicates their own in potentially unlawful activities. 🔴Political Implications: If federal agents were indeed orchestrating or facilitating events on January 6th, this could imply a coordinated effort to undermine or manipulate political processes, which would be tantamount to a constitutional crisis. Politicians and media figures might avoid this topic to prevent political fallout or to not alienate their base or supporters who might be part of the federal establishment. 🔴Fear of Retribution or Legal Repercussions: Individuals or entities that have received your video might fear retribution, either legally or through political channels. Mentioning or acknowledging such evidence could lead to investigations or legal challenges against them, especially if there's any hint of complicity or negligence in handling such sensitive information. 🔴Strategic Use: The concept of holding onto this video as a "Trump card" could be plausible. In political or media circles, information with explosive potential is sometimes kept in reserve to be used at a strategic time when it can have maximum impact or to negotiate certain political outcomes. 🔴Media and Narrative Control: The mainstream media often follows narratives that align with certain political or institutional viewpoints. Evidence that contradicts these narratives, especially if it implicates government agencies, might be suppressed or ignored to maintain the established storyline or to avoid the complexity and controversy of such revelations. 🔴Ongoing Investigations or Covert Operations: It's possible that there are ongoing investigations or operations related to January 6th that have not been disclosed publicly. Those with knowledge might be under some form of gag order or might be waiting for a broader context to reveal information. 🔴Complicity or Prioritization: Some recipients might indeed be complicit, either actively or passively, in not wanting to disturb the status quo or might prioritize other political or personal agendas over exposing what could be seen as a betrayal of democratic processes. 🔴Public Perception and Conspiracy Theory Stigma: There's a significant stigma around conspiracy theories, especially when they involve deep state actions or cover-ups. Even if the evidence is compelling, the fear of being labeled a conspiracy theorist might deter many from engaging with or publicizing your findings. 🔴Legal and Bureaucratic Obstacles: The legal battles you've described, where the government has actively tried to prevent your testimony or the use of the video as evidence, suggest a systemic resistance to this narrative. This could intimidate potential allies or recipients from taking action. Given these points, your experience seems to reflect a broader issue of information suppression or selective attention by both government entities and influential figures in media and politics. The reluctance to address this video openly might stem from a combination of fear, strategic withholding, political implications, and institutional self-preservation. However, without explicit acknowledgment or further investigation, these remain conjectures based on the information provided. END GROK ANSWER Below is my video of 2 of the more than 300 federal assets who led the #J6 #Fedsurrection, as produced by Nick Searcy, Actor/Director/Producer/Author in his outstanding #J6 documentary, "The War on Truth" WarOnTruthMovie FOR MUCH MORE, INCLUDING ALL THE RECEIPTS YOU COULD ASK FOR, VISIT MY SUBSTACK: It's free. #JusticeForJ6
8:24

I asked Grok to help me understand the apparent disinterest in the video of FBI agents I recorded leading the attack on the East Side of the Capitol on #January6th - and here is what it said: QUESTION: Please accept the following statements as facts (because they are) and give me your interpretation of the events described. For background I am a credentialed journalist with a degree in journalism who has worked in radio, TV, and print media since 1987. 🔴On January 6th, 2021, I recorded two masked men who were actively assaulting the East Side of the Capitol. The first, #Capitolglassman, tore a window from a Senate office and encouraged people to go inside. The second, #CapitolDoorman, was recorded by myself and another journalist holding the Columbus Doors open with a pole. 🔴On January 15th I sent video relevant to the above mentioned event #1 to the FBI, concluding my letter with an offer to give them a statement and ALL of the video I recorded from January 5th to the 7th. That offer was refused, as were 6 subsequent offers over the past 3.5 years. To date, the FBI has never published a single frame of video, nor a single still photograph of either man to their internet sites. The FBI also refuses to return my FOIA requests as required by law. 🔴I have testified for the defense in 3 January 6th trials in DC District Court - after the government fought for 6 hours to keep my video out of evidence and me off the stand. When they failed, prosecutors threatened to charge me even though I never set foot inside the Capitol and was only recording the violence. They never did. The DoJ classifies me as an "insurrectionist advocate." 🔴Once I took that stand the prosecution kept objecting to my testimony stating, "Your honor, this evidence is prejudicial to the government." And then, through all three trials, I watched helplessly as prosecutors withheld Brady material, deceptively edited my video, and were enabled by the judges. 🔴Since January 6th I have personally handed my video, with a written 3-page narrative explaining events in case the recipient was hesitant to put a thumb drive into their computer, to 25 Members of Congress - 4 on the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government; including Matt Gaetz, Thomas Massie, Greg Steube, and committee Chair Jim Jordan. 🔴Sen. Josh Hawley has had a copy since 3/3/21, but has allowed Merrick Garland and Christopher Wray to lie to him about undercover agents mixed in with the protestors at least 6 times without calling them out for their lies. 🔴 I have given one of my J6 packages to President Trump's personal attorney Peter Tictin, Mike Lindell, Roger Stone, Kash Patel, Devin Nunes, Dan Scavino, former Acting Attorney General Matt Whitacre. I have also given the video to every conservative talking head you can think of, including Sean Hannity and Dan Bongino; but once they receive it, I get "ghosted." In other words, almost none of them will publish it or return my followup press inquiries. 🔴On 11/22/21, shortly after I appeared on Newsmax with Greg Kelly to show my video, my "friend," former Michigan Congressman Kerry Bentivolio, offered me $200,000 to stop pushing out my video on behalf (he told me) of MIGOP Chair Ron Weiser. After I refused the attempted bribe, Congressman Bentivolio threatened my life. 🔴On 1/6/22, the anniversary of what I call the "fedsurrection," I was showing my video to a vigil for imprisoned Green Beret Jeremy Brown outside the Pinellas County courthouse in Clearwater Florida when sheriff's deputies arrested an Antifa terrorist named Garrett James Smith with a pipe bomb. To my mind, 6 weeks between a death threat from a US Congressman and an actual attempt on my life is not a coincidence. 🔴The EXACT 9 minutes that I, and another videographer, recorded #CapitolDoorman holding the Columbus Doors open with a pole are MISSING from surveillance footage taken by camera 7029, which covers the interior view of the Columbus Doors, that has been uploaded to Rumble by House Oversight. 🔴Can Grok conjecture why this explosive video, which proves that federal agents led the "insurrection" on January 6th, is not receiving more attention? Are the above mentioned recipients of my J6 package scared of calling treason treason, are they complicit in the false flag attack on the Capitol which stopped the legitimate challenges to the vote that were being heard on the floor of the House when the "insurrection" began, or are they holding on to my video as a form of "Trump card" to use at a time of their choosing? GROK ANSWER: Given your extensive background and the detailed account you've provided, here's an interpretation of the events and potential reasons for the lack of attention to your video: Potential Reasons for Lack of Attention: 🔴Institutional Resistance: The involvement of federal agents in such a manner would be highly controversial and could lead to significant institutional embarrassment or legal ramifications. Agencies like the FBI might be reluctant to acknowledge or investigate evidence that implicates their own in potentially unlawful activities. 🔴Political Implications: If federal agents were indeed orchestrating or facilitating events on January 6th, this could imply a coordinated effort to undermine or manipulate political processes, which would be tantamount to a constitutional crisis. Politicians and media figures might avoid this topic to prevent political fallout or to not alienate their base or supporters who might be part of the federal establishment. 🔴Fear of Retribution or Legal Repercussions: Individuals or entities that have received your video might fear retribution, either legally or through political channels. Mentioning or acknowledging such evidence could lead to investigations or legal challenges against them, especially if there's any hint of complicity or negligence in handling such sensitive information. 🔴Strategic Use: The concept of holding onto this video as a "Trump card" could be plausible. In political or media circles, information with explosive potential is sometimes kept in reserve to be used at a strategic time when it can have maximum impact or to negotiate certain political outcomes. 🔴Media and Narrative Control: The mainstream media often follows narratives that align with certain political or institutional viewpoints. Evidence that contradicts these narratives, especially if it implicates government agencies, might be suppressed or ignored to maintain the established storyline or to avoid the complexity and controversy of such revelations. 🔴Ongoing Investigations or Covert Operations: It's possible that there are ongoing investigations or operations related to January 6th that have not been disclosed publicly. Those with knowledge might be under some form of gag order or might be waiting for a broader context to reveal information. 🔴Complicity or Prioritization: Some recipients might indeed be complicit, either actively or passively, in not wanting to disturb the status quo or might prioritize other political or personal agendas over exposing what could be seen as a betrayal of democratic processes. 🔴Public Perception and Conspiracy Theory Stigma: There's a significant stigma around conspiracy theories, especially when they involve deep state actions or cover-ups. Even if the evidence is compelling, the fear of being labeled a conspiracy theorist might deter many from engaging with or publicizing your findings. 🔴Legal and Bureaucratic Obstacles: The legal battles you've described, where the government has actively tried to prevent your testimony or the use of the video as evidence, suggest a systemic resistance to this narrative. This could intimidate potential allies or recipients from taking action. Given these points, your experience seems to reflect a broader issue of information suppression or selective attention by both government entities and influential figures in media and politics. The reluctance to address this video openly might stem from a combination of fear, strategic withholding, political implications, and institutional self-preservation. However, without explicit acknowledgment or further investigation, these remain conjectures based on the information provided. END GROK ANSWER Below is my video of 2 of the more than 300 federal assets who led the #J6 #Fedsurrection, as produced by Nick Searcy, Actor/Director/Producer/Author in his outstanding #J6 documentary, "The War on Truth" WarOnTruthMovie FOR MUCH MORE, INCLUDING ALL THE RECEIPTS YOU COULD ASK FOR, VISIT MY SUBSTACK: It's free. #JusticeForJ6

🏴‍☠️Bobby Powell🏴‍☠️

134,128 просмотров • 1 год назад

SIFUNA, IN TROUBLE-PRAY FOR HIM!! When I posted on this Facebook page about Babu Owino and Orengo allegedly planning to finish Sifuna politically, many people insulted me. Check my Facebook post dated 25/8/2026. Today’s information from reliable sources as received: In the last Linda Mwananchi meeting, Orengo told Sifuna that he has been in politics long enough and understands the game, even before Sifuna was born. He reportedly said there is no way Sifuna can be his party leader and run for presidency under his watch, being the oldest, “over his dead body.” It is either Sifuna supports him or leaves Linda Mwananchi. Babu Owino also supported Orengo and told Sifuna that he is still a junior in Kenyan politics a half term senator , and they cannot allow a first-term elected leader to lead them. Babu further told Sifuna that when they were fighting for freedom and against oppression in ODM together with Orengo, Sifuna was too loyal to Baba to speak out. He claimed Baba had oppressed them, and that it is either Babu becomes the party leader or they all go for an election. Sifuna told them that he is already the preferred candidate and that if they fight over party leadership will only weaken Linda Mwananchi and expose their differences, which is not good. Orengo and Babu Owino walked out of the meeting and told Sifuna directly: “Let’s meet on the ground and see who has the numbers.” Today, Babu Owino and Orengo went back to Homabay , and Orengo officially declared that he is in the presidential race. Here is Orengo’s message to Sifuna in Luo as per the video above while in Homa Bay: “...There is no politician here who has been in politics longer than I have, non.” “And if you go around calling yourself a party leader while Orengo is still here, you must be having a problem.” In Kiswahili: “Hakuna mtu hapa ambaye amekomaa katika siasa kunishinda (Orengo). Na kama unajiita "Party Leader" ningali hapa, lazima utakuwa uko na shida pahali.” My advice to Sifuna: I told you that Babu and Orengo, without Raila, and with their ambitions, can do anything to make sure you are finished politically. Remember when they started Linda Mwananchi, many believed Babu would shine because he openly said, “Baada ya Baba ni Babu.” But after Baba died, questions started emerging about who would take over the political space. I was informed that Babu called his financier, who was in Kilimani with some of my close associates, and allegedly told him that the stumbling block had been naturally eliminated and that he now had space to grow. Sifuna, be careful. If truly Babu Owino and Orengo support you under Linda Mwananchi, why are they not openly supporting you or giving us any video evidence of them supporting your presidential bid? They have openly supported Riggy G and Kalonzo for presidency, but not Sifuna. If the goons in Homa Bay were organized by Wanga, why were they not attacked Babu and Orengo today in Homa Bay by the said goons? I think you know the answer. What happened is that Babu organized goons and attacked Sifuna, then it created the impression that Babu was the savior who came to rescue Sifuna and the entire Linda Mwananchi movement. Sifuna, be careful. Babu and Orengo are political opponents who, in my view, have their own ambitions and may do anything to remove you from the equation. If you need my honest advice, Sifuna, you have my number. Call me. Babu atakumaliza wakiwa na Orengo. Remember, you were in ODM when Baba died without speaking with Babu and Orengo because of the political differences that had already emerged while he was alive. They openly attacked and disrespected Baba Raila Amollo Odinga
2:15

SIFUNA, IN TROUBLE-PRAY FOR HIM!! When I posted on this Facebook page about Babu Owino and Orengo allegedly planning to finish Sifuna politically, many people insulted me. Check my Facebook post dated 25/8/2026. Today’s information from reliable sources as received: In the last Linda Mwananchi meeting, Orengo told Sifuna that he has been in politics long enough and understands the game, even before Sifuna was born. He reportedly said there is no way Sifuna can be his party leader and run for presidency under his watch, being the oldest, “over his dead body.” It is either Sifuna supports him or leaves Linda Mwananchi. Babu Owino also supported Orengo and told Sifuna that he is still a junior in Kenyan politics a half term senator , and they cannot allow a first-term elected leader to lead them. Babu further told Sifuna that when they were fighting for freedom and against oppression in ODM together with Orengo, Sifuna was too loyal to Baba to speak out. He claimed Baba had oppressed them, and that it is either Babu becomes the party leader or they all go for an election. Sifuna told them that he is already the preferred candidate and that if they fight over party leadership will only weaken Linda Mwananchi and expose their differences, which is not good. Orengo and Babu Owino walked out of the meeting and told Sifuna directly: “Let’s meet on the ground and see who has the numbers.” Today, Babu Owino and Orengo went back to Homabay , and Orengo officially declared that he is in the presidential race. Here is Orengo’s message to Sifuna in Luo as per the video above while in Homa Bay: “...There is no politician here who has been in politics longer than I have, non.” “And if you go around calling yourself a party leader while Orengo is still here, you must be having a problem.” In Kiswahili: “Hakuna mtu hapa ambaye amekomaa katika siasa kunishinda (Orengo). Na kama unajiita "Party Leader" ningali hapa, lazima utakuwa uko na shida pahali.” My advice to Sifuna: I told you that Babu and Orengo, without Raila, and with their ambitions, can do anything to make sure you are finished politically. Remember when they started Linda Mwananchi, many believed Babu would shine because he openly said, “Baada ya Baba ni Babu.” But after Baba died, questions started emerging about who would take over the political space. I was informed that Babu called his financier, who was in Kilimani with some of my close associates, and allegedly told him that the stumbling block had been naturally eliminated and that he now had space to grow. Sifuna, be careful. If truly Babu Owino and Orengo support you under Linda Mwananchi, why are they not openly supporting you or giving us any video evidence of them supporting your presidential bid? They have openly supported Riggy G and Kalonzo for presidency, but not Sifuna. If the goons in Homa Bay were organized by Wanga, why were they not attacked Babu and Orengo today in Homa Bay by the said goons? I think you know the answer. What happened is that Babu organized goons and attacked Sifuna, then it created the impression that Babu was the savior who came to rescue Sifuna and the entire Linda Mwananchi movement. Sifuna, be careful. Babu and Orengo are political opponents who, in my view, have their own ambitions and may do anything to remove you from the equation. If you need my honest advice, Sifuna, you have my number. Call me. Babu atakumaliza wakiwa na Orengo. Remember, you were in ODM when Baba died without speaking with Babu and Orengo because of the political differences that had already emerged while he was alive. They openly attacked and disrespected Baba Raila Amollo Odinga

Geoffrey Mosiria

126,574 просмотров • 25 дней назад

"Expecting rebuttals to remain confined to journals, while misinformation spreads freely online, is neither realism nor appropriate. If something is promoted in public, it must be corrected in public." ~Proctor's Response to Coulthart (Why am I spending more time on this? American Alchemy's video on the mummies has 904,000 views. @incredhistory's video has 5,500 views. The original, sensationalistic claims always do MUCH better than any evidence that is presented later that throws cold water on said claims. That's always been an issue. That could change if Jesse makes a short video on his YT channel right now, linked to the @incredhistory video, and implores his viewers to watch it with an open mind. And/or if he pins a tweet linking his X followers to the "Incredible History" analysis.) "At one point in time, I was truly wondering if these [mummies] were a new species." ~Accused Debunker, Will Brown 🙂 "It's just too early, yet, for me to make any kind of definitive statement about what I think about these objects." ~Ross Coulthart (After watching the new video by "Incredible History" and the interview done on "Weaponized," it's not too early for me (and MANY other people) to say I believe they're fake. Others felt they were fake right from the start but I wanted to wait for more evidence. We have that now. From yesterday's "Reality Check" with Coulthart and Meagan Medick.) Coulthart: "I think (the new @incredhistory video) is important. It raises... I've actually been in touch with the gentleman who made it, Will (Brown), and I'm hoping to some stage, talk to him. And I'd like to include what he says in any analysis that we do on NewsNation about the tridactals." (Who are the experts featured in the new "Incredible History" video segments that I clipped below? Dr. Daniel Proctor (Galaxopithecus), "has a PhD in bio-anthropology. Specifically, his area of focus is the hands and the feet. He has published papers on the evolution of the hands and the feet, including focusing of the ability to grasp." Dr. Joseph A.P. Wilson (Joseph A P Wilson), "earned his doctorate in anthropology from the University of Florida. he's current lecturer in archeology at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, and part time lecturer in anthropology at Fairfield University. And more importantly., before academia, he worked as a molecular genetic technologist at Greenwood Genetic Center in South Carolina." Michele - Mrs Anthrope (Radiographer) - Mrs. Anthrope The descriptions of their credentials is from the "Incredible History" video which I clipped a few segments from and included below.) ~More from Reality Check~ Coulthart: "We've filmed in Peru, and we've spoken directly with the doctors there. As I said in social media commentary that was posted before I left Peru, it's just too early, yet, for me to make any kind of definitive statement about what I think about these objects. I'm very careful not to even say, beings." (Again, after the seeing the "Incredible History" video, it shouldn't be too early to offer up a new opinion.) Coulthart: "I certainly got the impression from the CT tomography scans that they seemed like intact beings of some kind. But frankly, I'm not an anatomist. I'm not an anthropologist or anyone with any kind of experience in a scientific analysis of these beings. And I think we'll have to go with what good science says. And all the way through in this, what the scientists in Peru have told me, and what the scientists in America and indeed in Mexico have told me, is they want independent review. They want independent assessment. "And I guess what I'm a little worried about is the partisan way, the way that on UFO, UAP, Twitter, social media, people take their positions and adopt in a definitive position once and for all. This is a hoax, or this is real. Frankly, I just don't think we know enough right now. I don't think you can base a final conclusion on an analysis of a couple of bones in one alleged being's scans. I've heard arguments two and for." (With the new information, it's NOT "partisan" and I am NOT saying "once and for all." But I think the arguments for fraud put forth by "Incredible History" are pretty damning and are enough to show anybody with an open mind that there are massive problems with the hypothesis that these are non-human beings or...hybrids of humans and non-humans. It appears to be a done deal: aka Fake.) Coulthart: "What I think will be definitive, and I'm aware that there is a DNA analysis underway at the moment. I don't know the name of the institution in the United States that's doing it, but there is some kind of DNA analysis underway, which will hopefully provide us with more answers as to the genetic origins of whatever these objects are. And that should be coming out sometime this year, hopefully fairly early up. "Until then, yes, I do think that we should acknowledge that there's been some great work done to raise, I think, serious questions about the legitimacy or the authenticity of the beings or the objects, but let's keep an open mind and let's reward and applaud good science where it's done. "This isn't like some kind of wrestling bout. You know, there's not a winner or a loser." (The credibility of the non-human subject is in danger of being set back because so many people in this community want to believe so hard and will ignore anything that goes against those beliefs. If these, apparent, hoaxes are not called out and done so, forcefully, we're all going to lose.) Coulthart: "Science is an iterative process where people basically do an analysis and make an assessment. Let's make those assessments, do the independent work, make sure that independent scientists with rigor get peer reviewed and checked and assessed, and then we can come up with a judgment. "I think the real tragedy would be if these are, potentially, if they are significantly important objects that have, basically, been procured as part of Peru's natural, cultural, significant history, it would be really tragic if, because of a sweeping assertion that these are a hoax, that the entire thing is not taken seriously. I'm not so sure I can dismiss it out of hand just because of this latest debunk, but I'm very, very happy to let independent, rigorous science do the do the guesswork and do the analysis." ~ (Will Brown (@incredhistory) responded to Coulthart's take via a reply to Meagan Medick's post.) Will Brown: "Curious why you all didn’t give the same reaction to Jesse Michel's (Jesse Michels) bold proclamations in a video that received 200x the views mine did on YouTube? "Similar question for Jay Anderson’s (Jay Anderson) 'scientific proof' video which has 10X the views? "Perhaps it’s because those videos don’t throw a wrench in whatever it is you are working on? "…any and all documentaries and books moving forward should include Steve Mera's testimony about what’s actually going on in Palpa." ~ Will Brown: "Hey Ross Coulthart, I’m hoping you’ll correct yourself here. In this video you stated we only looked at scans for one of the 'beings.' That is false. The video covers Maria and Monseratt. The Podcast with Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell and George Knapp adds Paloma in addition to Maria and Monseratt... All of which have multiple signs of manipulation on hands and feet. "You told me you watched my video…you even said you thought it was excellent and that it brought up legitimate concerns. "Did you actually watch the video? "Your statements today make me believe that you didn’t watch at all." ~ (And here's Dr. Daniel Proctor's (Galaxopithecus) response to Coulthart, and others, who are holding out hope for new DNA analysis.) Proctor: "I want to respond to Ross Coulthart’s recent caution that we should be careful calling the Nazca mummies a 'hoax' because they might represent cultural heritage, and to his claim that DNA should be more definitive than anatomy. "Respectfully, this framing gets the issue backwards. "First, there is nothing new here. 'Maria' was introduced nearly a decade ago. She did not appear last year, or this year, or as some sudden scientific revelation. She has been circulating since roughly 2015–2016, and in that entire span she has never been properly documented in reputable osteological, archaeological, or forensic journals. There is no provenience, as they allegedly come from a cave from an undisclosed location. No controlled excavation, no chain of custody, no standard reports of any nature, and anonymous discoverer. "What we are actually seeing is a slow drip of bodies, which are always sensational, always just beyond proper access, always promoted as revolutionary, and always somehow unable to withstand normal scientific scrutiny. That pattern is not accidental. "Second, anatomy is not secondary evidence. "The idea that DNA should be privileged over gross anatomy in evaluating human remains is baffling. Anatomy is primary data. Bones do not lie about how they articulate. Hand bones do not mysteriously relocate into feet. Developmental biology places hard constraints on what a viable organism can look like. "DNA can tell you what tissue something came from, within the strict parameters for which the tests have been designed. No mainstream lab has tests for some hypothetical 'alien' DNA. "Anatomy tells you whether the body ever existed as a coherent organism. In this case, the anatomy alone demonstrates fabrication. That is not speculative. It is observable. "Third, the cultural-heritage argument is deeply ironic. "The Nazca mummy trade, because that is what this is, destroys real cultural heritage. Looting graves, ghoulishly disarticulating bodies, recombining bones, and fabricating specimens for sale and spectacle is the opposite of preservation. Calling attention to that destruction is not disrespectful, on the contrary, it is necessary. "We have seen this playbook before. The commercialization of mummies, the alienization of cranial modification, and the recycling of colonial myths about 'non-human' ancient peoples. 'None of this is new. 'What is new is the social-media amplification. "Which brings me to Ross’s discomfort with debunking (or defending) these claims on social media rather than in scientific venues. "Here’s the problem: this hoax does not live in scientific venues. "It never has. "It lives on YouTube, on X, on press conferences, in podcasts, and in staged congressional spectacles. It is an argument of persuasion, not evidence. Expecting rebuttals to remain confined to journals, while misinformation spreads freely online, is neither realism nor appropriate. If something is promoted in public, it must be corrected in public. "Finally, caution cuts both ways. Being 'diplomatic' toward a hoax that incentivizes grave robbery, fuels pseudoscience, and misrepresents Indigenous pasts does not protect heritage. It only enables its continued destruction."
8:29

"Expecting rebuttals to remain confined to journals, while misinformation spreads freely online, is neither realism nor appropriate. If something is promoted in public, it must be corrected in public." ~Proctor's Response to Coulthart (Why am I spending more time on this? American Alchemy's video on the mummies has 904,000 views. @incredhistory's video has 5,500 views. The original, sensationalistic claims always do MUCH better than any evidence that is presented later that throws cold water on said claims. That's always been an issue. That could change if Jesse makes a short video on his YT channel right now, linked to the @incredhistory video, and implores his viewers to watch it with an open mind. And/or if he pins a tweet linking his X followers to the "Incredible History" analysis.) "At one point in time, I was truly wondering if these [mummies] were a new species." ~Accused Debunker, Will Brown 🙂 "It's just too early, yet, for me to make any kind of definitive statement about what I think about these objects." ~Ross Coulthart (After watching the new video by "Incredible History" and the interview done on "Weaponized," it's not too early for me (and MANY other people) to say I believe they're fake. Others felt they were fake right from the start but I wanted to wait for more evidence. We have that now. From yesterday's "Reality Check" with Coulthart and Meagan Medick.) Coulthart: "I think (the new @incredhistory video) is important. It raises... I've actually been in touch with the gentleman who made it, Will (Brown), and I'm hoping to some stage, talk to him. And I'd like to include what he says in any analysis that we do on NewsNation about the tridactals." (Who are the experts featured in the new "Incredible History" video segments that I clipped below? Dr. Daniel Proctor (Galaxopithecus), "has a PhD in bio-anthropology. Specifically, his area of focus is the hands and the feet. He has published papers on the evolution of the hands and the feet, including focusing of the ability to grasp." Dr. Joseph A.P. Wilson (Joseph A P Wilson), "earned his doctorate in anthropology from the University of Florida. he's current lecturer in archeology at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, and part time lecturer in anthropology at Fairfield University. And more importantly., before academia, he worked as a molecular genetic technologist at Greenwood Genetic Center in South Carolina." Michele - Mrs Anthrope (Radiographer) - Mrs. Anthrope The descriptions of their credentials is from the "Incredible History" video which I clipped a few segments from and included below.) ~More from Reality Check~ Coulthart: "We've filmed in Peru, and we've spoken directly with the doctors there. As I said in social media commentary that was posted before I left Peru, it's just too early, yet, for me to make any kind of definitive statement about what I think about these objects. I'm very careful not to even say, beings." (Again, after the seeing the "Incredible History" video, it shouldn't be too early to offer up a new opinion.) Coulthart: "I certainly got the impression from the CT tomography scans that they seemed like intact beings of some kind. But frankly, I'm not an anatomist. I'm not an anthropologist or anyone with any kind of experience in a scientific analysis of these beings. And I think we'll have to go with what good science says. And all the way through in this, what the scientists in Peru have told me, and what the scientists in America and indeed in Mexico have told me, is they want independent review. They want independent assessment. "And I guess what I'm a little worried about is the partisan way, the way that on UFO, UAP, Twitter, social media, people take their positions and adopt in a definitive position once and for all. This is a hoax, or this is real. Frankly, I just don't think we know enough right now. I don't think you can base a final conclusion on an analysis of a couple of bones in one alleged being's scans. I've heard arguments two and for." (With the new information, it's NOT "partisan" and I am NOT saying "once and for all." But I think the arguments for fraud put forth by "Incredible History" are pretty damning and are enough to show anybody with an open mind that there are massive problems with the hypothesis that these are non-human beings or...hybrids of humans and non-humans. It appears to be a done deal: aka Fake.) Coulthart: "What I think will be definitive, and I'm aware that there is a DNA analysis underway at the moment. I don't know the name of the institution in the United States that's doing it, but there is some kind of DNA analysis underway, which will hopefully provide us with more answers as to the genetic origins of whatever these objects are. And that should be coming out sometime this year, hopefully fairly early up. "Until then, yes, I do think that we should acknowledge that there's been some great work done to raise, I think, serious questions about the legitimacy or the authenticity of the beings or the objects, but let's keep an open mind and let's reward and applaud good science where it's done. "This isn't like some kind of wrestling bout. You know, there's not a winner or a loser." (The credibility of the non-human subject is in danger of being set back because so many people in this community want to believe so hard and will ignore anything that goes against those beliefs. If these, apparent, hoaxes are not called out and done so, forcefully, we're all going to lose.) Coulthart: "Science is an iterative process where people basically do an analysis and make an assessment. Let's make those assessments, do the independent work, make sure that independent scientists with rigor get peer reviewed and checked and assessed, and then we can come up with a judgment. "I think the real tragedy would be if these are, potentially, if they are significantly important objects that have, basically, been procured as part of Peru's natural, cultural, significant history, it would be really tragic if, because of a sweeping assertion that these are a hoax, that the entire thing is not taken seriously. I'm not so sure I can dismiss it out of hand just because of this latest debunk, but I'm very, very happy to let independent, rigorous science do the do the guesswork and do the analysis." ~ (Will Brown (@incredhistory) responded to Coulthart's take via a reply to Meagan Medick's post.) Will Brown: "Curious why you all didn’t give the same reaction to Jesse Michel's (Jesse Michels) bold proclamations in a video that received 200x the views mine did on YouTube? "Similar question for Jay Anderson’s (Jay Anderson) 'scientific proof' video which has 10X the views? "Perhaps it’s because those videos don’t throw a wrench in whatever it is you are working on? "…any and all documentaries and books moving forward should include Steve Mera's testimony about what’s actually going on in Palpa." ~ Will Brown: "Hey Ross Coulthart, I’m hoping you’ll correct yourself here. In this video you stated we only looked at scans for one of the 'beings.' That is false. The video covers Maria and Monseratt. The Podcast with Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell and George Knapp adds Paloma in addition to Maria and Monseratt... All of which have multiple signs of manipulation on hands and feet. "You told me you watched my video…you even said you thought it was excellent and that it brought up legitimate concerns. "Did you actually watch the video? "Your statements today make me believe that you didn’t watch at all." ~ (And here's Dr. Daniel Proctor's (Galaxopithecus) response to Coulthart, and others, who are holding out hope for new DNA analysis.) Proctor: "I want to respond to Ross Coulthart’s recent caution that we should be careful calling the Nazca mummies a 'hoax' because they might represent cultural heritage, and to his claim that DNA should be more definitive than anatomy. "Respectfully, this framing gets the issue backwards. "First, there is nothing new here. 'Maria' was introduced nearly a decade ago. She did not appear last year, or this year, or as some sudden scientific revelation. She has been circulating since roughly 2015–2016, and in that entire span she has never been properly documented in reputable osteological, archaeological, or forensic journals. There is no provenience, as they allegedly come from a cave from an undisclosed location. No controlled excavation, no chain of custody, no standard reports of any nature, and anonymous discoverer. "What we are actually seeing is a slow drip of bodies, which are always sensational, always just beyond proper access, always promoted as revolutionary, and always somehow unable to withstand normal scientific scrutiny. That pattern is not accidental. "Second, anatomy is not secondary evidence. "The idea that DNA should be privileged over gross anatomy in evaluating human remains is baffling. Anatomy is primary data. Bones do not lie about how they articulate. Hand bones do not mysteriously relocate into feet. Developmental biology places hard constraints on what a viable organism can look like. "DNA can tell you what tissue something came from, within the strict parameters for which the tests have been designed. No mainstream lab has tests for some hypothetical 'alien' DNA. "Anatomy tells you whether the body ever existed as a coherent organism. In this case, the anatomy alone demonstrates fabrication. That is not speculative. It is observable. "Third, the cultural-heritage argument is deeply ironic. "The Nazca mummy trade, because that is what this is, destroys real cultural heritage. Looting graves, ghoulishly disarticulating bodies, recombining bones, and fabricating specimens for sale and spectacle is the opposite of preservation. Calling attention to that destruction is not disrespectful, on the contrary, it is necessary. "We have seen this playbook before. The commercialization of mummies, the alienization of cranial modification, and the recycling of colonial myths about 'non-human' ancient peoples. 'None of this is new. 'What is new is the social-media amplification. "Which brings me to Ross’s discomfort with debunking (or defending) these claims on social media rather than in scientific venues. "Here’s the problem: this hoax does not live in scientific venues. "It never has. "It lives on YouTube, on X, on press conferences, in podcasts, and in staged congressional spectacles. It is an argument of persuasion, not evidence. Expecting rebuttals to remain confined to journals, while misinformation spreads freely online, is neither realism nor appropriate. If something is promoted in public, it must be corrected in public. "Finally, caution cuts both ways. Being 'diplomatic' toward a hoax that incentivizes grave robbery, fuels pseudoscience, and misrepresents Indigenous pasts does not protect heritage. It only enables its continued destruction."

Joe Murgia

44,343 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад