Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

👀 Mercury,the key element behind ancient technology. It is repelled by garlic and attracted to gold. When a mirror is placed next to it, it has no reflection; it also emits free energy and overheats the metals that come into contact with it. It is fascinating to see that...

38,053 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

THE TRUTH ABOUT PYRAMIDS The Pyramids were a source of ancient free energy. Ancient civilizations understood the Earths energy function. Our understanding of the ancient civilizations discovery of electricity could very well be wrong. The Giza pyramid was made with granite and limestone. Granite is a conductive stone when exposed to heat, pressure, and water. Limestone is semi conductive. When a sandstorm occurs the pyramids would have been hit with positive charged sand and would have created extreme amounts of electrostatic energy flowing through the limestone charging it with electrons, because it is a semi conductor, right into the granite which has a positive charge and into the conductive granite. Granit is more conductive but has a positive charge so it would not build the same level of static charge as the limestone. Limestone is also know to have a certain level of thermal resistance that could prevent the pyramid from giving off excess heat. Also within the lower chambers of the Pyramid they found copper wire. This could've been used to channel the energy into the sarcophagi. Which some have speculated these granite blocks could've been primitive batteries/capacitators. Wire isn't needed since granite sufficiently charges the air within. It could've been used to ionize the air to create a conductive plasma shooting it to other pyramids with the pyramids that act as receivers with gold capstones to conduct the ionic beams. This free energy system would've sent energy up through the air rather than using wires. The theory is that desert pyramids built out of granite and limestone would've produced the energy while other pyramids would receive the energy. THINK WORLDWIDE. Some estimate this would measure more than 100,000 volts electricity PER METER in sandstorms.

Redpill Drifter

57,908 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The Great Lie of "Safe Mercury" in Vaccines, Exposed. They told you the mercury in vaccines is the "good" kind. They told you it leaves the body quickly. They told you it's safer than the mercury in a tuna fish sandwich. According to RFK Jr., they knew it was a lie. And he has the evidence. The claim that ethylmercury (Thimerosal) is rapidly excreted originated with its creator, Eli Lilly, in 1930—with zero scientific backing. Decades later, it became a mantra, seemingly validated by a 2003 CDC study (Pichichero) that showed mercury from vaccines vanishing from children's blood within days, while mercury from tuna remained for weeks. But world-renowned toxicologists asked the critical question: "Where did the ethylmercury go?" It wasn't in the blood, sweat, urine, or hair. So, the NIH commissioned a definitive monkey study (Burbacher). The results were damning: • The vaccine mercury did quickly clear the blood, just as in the children. • But when researchers examined the monkeys' brains, they made a shocking discovery. • The monkeys who received the vaccine-preservative mercury had MORE THAN DOUBLE the mercury in their brains compared to the tuna-fed monkeys. • Worse, the ethylmercury had metabolized into inorganic mercury, a highly toxic form that can persist in the brain for decades. The "good mercury" was not only staying in the body—it was targeting the brain more aggressively than its so-called "bad" counterpart. RFK Jr. recounts a recorded conversation with Dr. Paul Offit, a leading vaccine advocate, who repeated this "good mercury vs. bad mercury" fairytale. When confronted with the Burbacher monkey study, Offit fell silent, admitted the original study didn't prove the claim, and promised to "get back to him." He never did. The truth is mercury is cumulative. FDA internal studies have shown children receive mercury exposures from vaccines hundreds of times over safety limits. While industry defenders correctly state we are exposed to mercury from other environmental sources, injecting a potent neurotoxin directly into the bloodstream—one that crosses the blood-brain barrier and lodges itself there—is not a solution. It's a catastrophic part of the problem. This isn't a medical debate. It's a betrayal of public trust. The science has been clear for years, and they know it.

Camus

80,662 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Healthy mercury in the body? Short thread 🧵 Robert F Kennedy discussed with Joe Rogan about the different types of Mercury, Ethylmercury vs Methylmercury. He illustrated this discussion using a conversation he says he had with Dr Paul Offit, in regards to how older vaccines were produced. RFK asks: “Why is it that CDC recommends that Pregnant women do not eat Tuna Fish to avoid the mercury, but that CDC is recommending mercury containing flu shots”. According to RFK, Dr. Paul Offit said "There’s a good mercury and theres a bad mercury." According to RFK, speaking to the reasoning behind even using mercury in products: "The NIH admitted that it was an adjuvent, to amplify the immune response." RFK added that "The more toxic the adjuvent the more robust the immune response". Apparently the immune system doesn’t react as powerfully if it’s just a “live virus” without adjuvant. According to RFK (and this makes total sense), vaccine developers always disagreed with Toxicologists, because the Toxicologist would always ask "What is the fate of that in your body?”. RFK dived into some of the studies he discussed with Paul Offit at the time. Apparently, Offit went silent about a very important study that RFK knew about when he asked the question about why they're using mercury in vaccines. It's at this point, Dr Offit sighted the Pichichero study. That's when RFK "caught him in a lie". In the Pichichero study of 2002 (10), they noticed the ethylmercury was excreted very quickly. Pichichero also found that the "Estimated blood half-life of ethylmercury was 7 days" [for] the cohort of 2 - 6 x month old babies (yes you read that right, they got mercury). Then RFK adds that "The NIH actually commissioned a study", to find out the truth of the fate of the different types of mercury. Which is why they enlisted the help of Thomas Burbacher. He basically did the same study (8), but did it with monkeys so that at the end (sadly and unethically) he could k*ll the monkeys. He found that Pajero was RIGHT about one fact. The ethylmercury "was gone from their blood in a week" - RFK. BUT importantly, when he did the Post-mortems, Burbacher found out the reason they couldn't find it in the same places Pajero looked. It was accumulating in the brains of the monkeys.

Humanspective

27,158 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Copper and pyramids have each inspired centuries of fascination. Put them together, and it is easy to see why theories begin to emerge. Videos like this often claim that copper pyramids were once used to "charge" the human body, preserve food, or harness mysterious forms of energy. While these ideas continue to circulate online, there is no historical or archaeological evidence that such devices were used in the 19th century or that they were later banned. That does not mean copper itself was unimportant. Ancient civilizations valued copper long before the Bronze Age. It was one of the first metals humans learned to shape into tools, ornaments, and ceremonial objects. The Egyptians, Mesopotamians, Indus Valley civilization, and many others recognized its practical qualities, including its durability, conductivity, and natural antimicrobial properties, which modern science has since confirmed. Pyramids, too, have long captured the human imagination. Across different cultures, they served as tombs, temples, monuments, and symbols of cosmic order. Their enduring presence has inspired countless theories, some grounded in archaeology and others in speculation. Perhaps that is what makes the ancient world so compelling. The real achievements of our ancestors are already extraordinary. Their engineering, craftsmanship, and understanding of materials continue to impress us without the need to attribute technologies for which there is no evidence. Sometimes the greatest mystery is not whether ancient people possessed forgotten powers. It is how they accomplished so much with the knowledge and tools they truly had. Why do you think copper and pyramids continue to inspire so many theories today? ✨🙌🏾💫

🧬Maxpein🧬

31,502 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

The carnyx is an ancient musical instrument that best-known to have been used by the Celts during the Iron Age. Between 300 BC and 200 AD, the carnyx was used in many parts of Europe. In the ancient literary records, the carnyx is most commonly depicted as an instrument that accompanied Celtic warriors when they went into battle. Apart from literary sources, references to the carnyx have also been found on pieces of art and coins. Lastly, remains of this musical instrument have occasionally been found during archaeological excavations. The carnyx may be described as a type of war trumpet. This instrument was a valveless horn that was made of beaten bronze, and can be easily recognized due to its ſ-shape. Another distinct feature of the carnyx is its bell, which often depicts the head of some animal. Such animals include boars, dragons, serpents, birds and wolves. The bells of the carnyx were fashioned after these animals so as to strike fear into enemy warriors. Additionally, some bells were made with joints at the jaws, which would cause the animal’s head to move when the instrument was blown, thus adding to the psychological effect it had on the enemy. Whilst the sight of the carnyx struck fear into the hearts of the enemy, it was the sound of it, which has been described as lugubrious and harsh, that probably had a greater impact on enemy morale. It may be pointed out that it is unlikely that we will ever know how their carnyces had sounded. Nevertheless, it is possible to recreate this instrument, given that some of them have been found during archaeological excavations, and perhaps achieve a slightly better understanding of how this instrument worked. One example of a carnyx that has survived is the Deskford Carnyx, which was discovered in Deskford in Banffshire, Scotland. Only the head of this instrument was found, and it has been speculated that it had been buried as a votive offering to the gods. Although this instrument did not survive in its entirety, it provided enough information for a replica to be made. In order to recreate the rest of the carnyx, parallels, most notably artistic depictions from elsewhere in Europe were consulted. As a result, it is possible for us to hear the kind of sound a carnyx may have emitted when it was played. Nevertheless, the Deskford Carnyx is only one example of such an instrument. Prior to 2004, the remains of only five carynces were known. These instruments were found in Scotland, France, Germany, Switzerland and Romania respectively. In November 2004, a deposit of seven carynces was unearthed at Tintignac, a Gallo-Roman site at Tintignac in the Corrèze region of southern France. One of these carnyces had a bell in the shape of a serpent’s head with huge ears. A recreation of this carnyx was also made, and the sound produced by this instrument was quite different from that of the Deskford Carnyx. Thus, it has been shown that there were different types of carnyces in existence. Additionally, the carnyx from Tintignac also forced experts to re-evaluate the way that this instrument was played. Prior to its discovery, it was thought that the carnyx was held vertically, as depicted in some pieces of ancient art. The carnyx from Tintignac, however, had a completely straight tube, as opposed to other carnyces which had a slight bend at the mouth end of the tube. This meant that the carnyx from Tintignac was most likely played more or less horizontally, rather than vertically. This has led to the speculation that the carnyx, though traditionally associated with warfare, may have had a ritualistic function, and had been used for other occasions, such as feasts, funerals and weddings, as well. #archaeohistories

Archaeo - Histories

13,852 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten