正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Methuselah @EcdoPrep has created an interactive globe that illustrates ECDO evidence from around the world. That interactive globe is located here: His original YouTube introductory video is located here: His tweet introducing the new interactive globe is located here: To learn more about ECDO, go here: Exothermic Core-Mantle Decoupling...

sunfellow's profile picture

David Sunfellow

5,855 subscribers

14,707 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Core Mantle Decoupling: Analyzing Alarming LOD & Rotational Anomalies The Ethical Skeptic Ethical Skeptic ☀, Zacharias and Craig Stone Craig Stone discuss "The Death of Wobble and the Onset of True Polar Wander" and how it applies to other Exothermic Core-Mantle Decoupling – Dzhanibekov Oscillation (ECDO) issues. Original X discussion: (With Graphics) (Audio Only) Follow the speakers/host on X: Ethical Skeptic ☀ (TES) Zacharias Craig Stone (Craig Stone) Green Eggs-n-Sam Related Links: The Death of Wobble and the Onset of True Polar Wander (Zacharias) The Wobble Collapse Is Real And Every Day Of Data I Add, The Confirmation Just Grows (Zacharias) Master Exothermic Core-Mantle Decoupling – Dzhanibekov Oscillation (ECDO) Theory (Ethical Skeptic ☀) Unshattered Sands: Evidence Of A ~12,900-Year Cataclysmic Flood And Electrical Activity Driven By Exothermic Core-Mantle Decoupling (Craig Stone) Simple Summary of “Unshattered Sands” by Craig Stone (Craig Stone) Junho’s (Junho) Evidence Research Papers On The Exothermic Core-Mantle Decoupling Dzhanibekov Oscillation (ECDO) Theory See also: The Coming Geomagnetic Pole Shift Ancient Civilizations & Earth Disaster Cycles
1:46:00

Core Mantle Decoupling: Analyzing Alarming LOD & Rotational Anomalies The Ethical Skeptic Ethical Skeptic ☀, Zacharias and Craig Stone Craig Stone discuss "The Death of Wobble and the Onset of True Polar Wander" and how it applies to other Exothermic Core-Mantle Decoupling – Dzhanibekov Oscillation (ECDO) issues. Original X discussion: (With Graphics) (Audio Only) Follow the speakers/host on X: Ethical Skeptic ☀ (TES) Zacharias Craig Stone (Craig Stone) Green Eggs-n-Sam Related Links: The Death of Wobble and the Onset of True Polar Wander (Zacharias) The Wobble Collapse Is Real And Every Day Of Data I Add, The Confirmation Just Grows (Zacharias) Master Exothermic Core-Mantle Decoupling – Dzhanibekov Oscillation (ECDO) Theory (Ethical Skeptic ☀) Unshattered Sands: Evidence Of A ~12,900-Year Cataclysmic Flood And Electrical Activity Driven By Exothermic Core-Mantle Decoupling (Craig Stone) Simple Summary of “Unshattered Sands” by Craig Stone (Craig Stone) Junho’s (Junho) Evidence Research Papers On The Exothermic Core-Mantle Decoupling Dzhanibekov Oscillation (ECDO) Theory See also: The Coming Geomagnetic Pole Shift Ancient Civilizations & Earth Disaster Cycles

David Sunfellow

14,439 次观看 • 7 个月前

Cunningham Advices People Who Believe A Pole Shift Is Coming To Seriously Investigate ECDO Theory "I'm not a prepper. I've had several groups ask me to join them . . . and these are powerful groups . . . they are prepping for an event and they wanted to review [ECDO] Theory. I've had several private presentations, including members of the Royal Family in the U.K...." -- Roger Cunningham, Ethical Skeptic ☀ on X Watch the full, unedited video on X: Watch the full, unedited video on Rumble: Roger Cunningham videos on my Rumble channel Related Links: ECDO Full Page Interactive Viewer Why Are The Earth's Oceans Warming So Rapidly? Hidden In Plain Sight The 3,000–5,000 BCE Y-DNA Culling Event Could Only Have Been Produced By A Global Cataclysm Craig Stone's Eureka! Discovery: Groundtruth (The Earth Speaks) Exothermic Core-Mantle Decoupling - Dzhanibekov Oscillation (ECDO) Theory Inversion — ECDO Theory The Hidden Mechanism Driving Cataclysm, Cultural Tradition, and Climate By Roger B. Cunningham The Coming Pole Shift Pole Shift Articles On X Ancient Civilizations & Earth Disaster Cycles
2:38

Cunningham Advices People Who Believe A Pole Shift Is Coming To Seriously Investigate ECDO Theory "I'm not a prepper. I've had several groups ask me to join them . . . and these are powerful groups . . . they are prepping for an event and they wanted to review [ECDO] Theory. I've had several private presentations, including members of the Royal Family in the U.K...." -- Roger Cunningham, Ethical Skeptic ☀ on X Watch the full, unedited video on X: Watch the full, unedited video on Rumble: Roger Cunningham videos on my Rumble channel Related Links: ECDO Full Page Interactive Viewer Why Are The Earth's Oceans Warming So Rapidly? Hidden In Plain Sight The 3,000–5,000 BCE Y-DNA Culling Event Could Only Have Been Produced By A Global Cataclysm Craig Stone's Eureka! Discovery: Groundtruth (The Earth Speaks) Exothermic Core-Mantle Decoupling - Dzhanibekov Oscillation (ECDO) Theory Inversion — ECDO Theory The Hidden Mechanism Driving Cataclysm, Cultural Tradition, and Climate By Roger B. Cunningham The Coming Pole Shift Pole Shift Articles On X Ancient Civilizations & Earth Disaster Cycles

David Sunfellow

24,130 次观看 • 5 天前

Ben Davidson: When Civilization Is Likely To End "Approximately in the 2040s, we should expect the final acceleration to 100x of the original pole motion speed and it's only a matter of months until the end of our civilization." -- Ben Davidson, SpaceWeatherNews Excerpted from: Crust is Tearing, Solar Alert This Week | S0 News June.20.2026 Learn more: The Earth Disaster Cycle (Scientific Discussion) The Disaster Cycle Movie Website The Sun, The Earth and The Disaster Cycle (book) By Ben Davidson Suspicious Observers See also: Grok, When, Exactly, Will The Predicted Crustal Displacement Take Place? So When, Exactly, Is The Pole Shift Going To Happen? ECDO - Ethical Skeptic ☀ - 6 Earth System Shifts Happening Now Outstanding Summary: Roger Cunningham & Ben Davidson 2026 Pole Shift Conference Presentations The Coming Pole Shift Pole Shift Articles On X Ancient Civilizations & Earth Disaster Cycles
0:46

Ben Davidson: When Civilization Is Likely To End "Approximately in the 2040s, we should expect the final acceleration to 100x of the original pole motion speed and it's only a matter of months until the end of our civilization." -- Ben Davidson, SpaceWeatherNews Excerpted from: Crust is Tearing, Solar Alert This Week | S0 News June.20.2026 Learn more: The Earth Disaster Cycle (Scientific Discussion) The Disaster Cycle Movie Website The Sun, The Earth and The Disaster Cycle (book) By Ben Davidson Suspicious Observers See also: Grok, When, Exactly, Will The Predicted Crustal Displacement Take Place? So When, Exactly, Is The Pole Shift Going To Happen? ECDO - Ethical Skeptic ☀ - 6 Earth System Shifts Happening Now Outstanding Summary: Roger Cunningham & Ben Davidson 2026 Pole Shift Conference Presentations The Coming Pole Shift Pole Shift Articles On X Ancient Civilizations & Earth Disaster Cycles

David Sunfellow

17,694 次观看 • 1 个月前

Ben Davidson: The Two Main Differences Between His Pole Shift Scenario & The Ethical Skeptic's Excerpted from Observers Live #16 - Mountain Before You (streamed January 6, 2026) Upcoming conference featuring Ben Davidson SpaceWeatherNews and The Ethical Skeptic Ethical Skeptic ☀ Related Information: GROK, please compare The Ethical Skeptic’s ECDO hypothesis with Ben Davidson’s views on an imminent pole shift. Create a chart that lists where they agree and disagree. Excerpt: “In summary, they converge on an urgent, cyclic pole-related catastrophe rooted in core-mantle dynamics, backed by similar data, but split on the spark (Earth’s ‘hot core’ vs. Sun’s ‘micronova’). ECDO feels more Earth-centric and mechanics-focused, while Davidson’s is solar-systemic and electromagnetic. If either pans out, the overlaps mean shared prep advice: stock up, go high, and watch the poles…” View GROK’s chart and commentary here: The Ethical Skeptic Ethical Skeptic ☀ adds: “The core mechanics and micronova constructs are compatible. They each deal with separate elements in the same causal chain.” Source: Ben Davidson SpaceWeatherNews adds: “Wild how much we agree actually.” Source: Concerning GROK’s summary, Ben Davidson SpaceWeatherNews writes: “VERY CLOSE. Only thing it got wrong was that I say it’s 6000 years, with a multiplier harmonic at 12,000. Otherwise, accurate breakdown.” Source:
2:12

Ben Davidson: The Two Main Differences Between His Pole Shift Scenario & The Ethical Skeptic's Excerpted from Observers Live #16 - Mountain Before You (streamed January 6, 2026) Upcoming conference featuring Ben Davidson SpaceWeatherNews and The Ethical Skeptic Ethical Skeptic ☀ Related Information: GROK, please compare The Ethical Skeptic’s ECDO hypothesis with Ben Davidson’s views on an imminent pole shift. Create a chart that lists where they agree and disagree. Excerpt: “In summary, they converge on an urgent, cyclic pole-related catastrophe rooted in core-mantle dynamics, backed by similar data, but split on the spark (Earth’s ‘hot core’ vs. Sun’s ‘micronova’). ECDO feels more Earth-centric and mechanics-focused, while Davidson’s is solar-systemic and electromagnetic. If either pans out, the overlaps mean shared prep advice: stock up, go high, and watch the poles…” View GROK’s chart and commentary here: The Ethical Skeptic Ethical Skeptic ☀ adds: “The core mechanics and micronova constructs are compatible. They each deal with separate elements in the same causal chain.” Source: Ben Davidson SpaceWeatherNews adds: “Wild how much we agree actually.” Source: Concerning GROK’s summary, Ben Davidson SpaceWeatherNews writes: “VERY CLOSE. Only thing it got wrong was that I say it’s 6000 years, with a multiplier harmonic at 12,000. Otherwise, accurate breakdown.” Source:

David Sunfellow

1,479,989 次观看 • 7 个月前

ECDO vs. EDC: the geometry seems to like a coupled crust and mantle. The biggest difference between the two theories is what moves during the proposed reorientation. ECDO, as proposed by Ethical Skeptic ☀, has the moving shell extending from the surface down to the core–mantle boundary. EDC, as proposed by SpaceWeatherNews, uses a much shallower shell, roughly 100 km deep, above the low-velocity zone. So, I tested that difference directly. First up: LIPs and LLSVPs. Across every tomography model in the analysis, the alignment held up better when the crust and mantle stayed together. Applying the exact 85º crust-only correction made the fit worse. Then, I checked five major hotspot tracks. Same story. The hotspot trails were best preserved without a large independent crustal rotation, and even letting the Euler pole wander around the globe could not rescue an 85º crust-only shift. At this point, the geometry is being pretty stubborn: the crust wants to stay with the mantle. That is strong evidence against the exact shallow shell geometry tested here. It supports preservation of crust–mantle coupling during any large reorientation. One caveat: a brief out and back excursion could restore the original alignment. That version would need to be tested using records formed during the temporary displaced interval. Apparently, the theory found another level.
0:25

ECDO vs. EDC: the geometry seems to like a coupled crust and mantle. The biggest difference between the two theories is what moves during the proposed reorientation. ECDO, as proposed by Ethical Skeptic ☀, has the moving shell extending from the surface down to the core–mantle boundary. EDC, as proposed by SpaceWeatherNews, uses a much shallower shell, roughly 100 km deep, above the low-velocity zone. So, I tested that difference directly. First up: LIPs and LLSVPs. Across every tomography model in the analysis, the alignment held up better when the crust and mantle stayed together. Applying the exact 85º crust-only correction made the fit worse. Then, I checked five major hotspot tracks. Same story. The hotspot trails were best preserved without a large independent crustal rotation, and even letting the Euler pole wander around the globe could not rescue an 85º crust-only shift. At this point, the geometry is being pretty stubborn: the crust wants to stay with the mantle. That is strong evidence against the exact shallow shell geometry tested here. It supports preservation of crust–mantle coupling during any large reorientation. One caveat: a brief out and back excursion could restore the original alignment. That version would need to be tested using records formed during the temporary displaced interval. Apparently, the theory found another level.

Stephanie Buchanan

17,108 次观看 • 18 天前

MIND-BLOWING🤯 Systems engineer and author Roger Cunningham explains how a cataclysmic event caused global oceanic displacement ~7,000 years ago, inundating the Pyramids of Giza, which are actually "warning indicators" for future civilizations that the cataclysm will happen again In this clip from a UK Column (UK Column) interview with Jerm Warfare, Cunningham (Ethical Skeptic ☀) describes ECDO Theory (Exothermic Core-Mantle Decoupling – Dzhanibekov Oscillation), which is a hypothesis proposed by Cunningham that explains periodic catastrophic Earth changes through internal geophysical processes. The theory summarized, per Grok: "In simple terms: The Earth's solid iron-nickel core periodically undergoes exothermic (heat-releasing) phase changes in its crystal structure. This heat rises through the mantle into the oceans (contributing to climate shifts and deep-ocean warming), while also weakening the geomagnetic field that normally 'locks' the outer shell (crust + mantle) to the spinning core. "Once the magnetic grip weakens enough, the outer shell can decouple and rapidly reorient relative to the spin axis in a Dzhanibekov-like flip (the tennis-racket theorem effect seen in spinning objects). This causes a true polar wander of roughly 104° along a specific meridian, shifting the geographic poles, sloshing oceans to create global floods, realigning ancient monuments to a former pole position (e.g., in southern Africa), and triggering cataclysms recorded in myths and geology. The system then oscillates back to its current stable state once the core regenerates. "The theory unifies evidence from climate anomalies, ancient site alignments, paleomagnetic data, and flood legends into one cyclic mechanism, with implications for past civilization resets and potential future events." ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- Cunningham: "I wouldn't call Charles Hapgood's notion a theory because it didn't have the elements of hypothesis in it. But it's a cool idea. It's an excellent construct. And that's where you start when you develop hypotheses. You start with a construct. "He said that the outside body of the Earth, like the skin of an orange, rotates independently and presents a new surface to the North Star. His sighting was that caused the inundations. So that was the first thinking, really, that's centered around this type of idea. "What ECDO theory postulates is that this decoupling, instead of happening at the crust, where there really isn't a mechanism to decouple, and that really has been one of the things that's kept the theory squelched, is there's no viable mechanism there, the viable mechanism does exist at the core–mantle boundary. "In fact, it suggests that this is an absolutely stark potential, if you look at the core–mantle boundary, that's what ECDO proposes, that particular situation in the core–mantle boundary causes this outer rotational body to do an inertial interchange True Polar Wander. "A portion of that wander was smooth and gentle, within reason. I'm sure the oceans were a little more energetic, but a portion of it during the capture by an inverted geomagnetic pole, in other words, the magnetic pole's north pole was down in Antarctica when it was captured by that when our outer magnetite structure of the crust was captured by that pole, it was pulled into location very rapidly, and that's what precipitated these oceans to come up out of their banks. "It did exactly what the Gong Gong historians said. They said that the sky rolled from the southeast to the northwest. And that's exactly what the ECDO rotation presupposes. And we developed the rotation based on the geomechanics first. We didn't look at the myths. And then we went out and took that geo- rotation and said, okay, let's compare this rotation to the myths that are out there that are informative, like the Epic of Gilgamesh, like the Gong Gong theory, or the Gong Gong tradition. And in fact, they matched in the geostrata the location of the saline diatomaceous deserts that have aridified across the planet. They all match this ECDO rotation. "And that's what the six or eight modeling groups that are working on ECDO now, they're finding, unequivocally, a good match to the Earth's deserts, to this, this inundation and rotation." Jerm: "So that would have been quite a quick event?" Cunningham: "A portion of it, the capture. Right now, as we understand the differential inertial moments in the Earth, they're not large enough to cause a 12-hour or 18-hour rotation of the Earth in this— into this new position. However, if we introduce an inverted geomagnetic pole, the geomagnetic pole captures the Earth's shell and brings it into alignment with wherever it is. "Once the north magnetic pole makes its journey across Asia, the central body of Asia, and then through the Bay of Bengal and down into Antarctica below Africa, it reinvigorates, it re-strengthens its, its permeability or its polarity and captures the Earth's body. Except now the Earth instead of pointing toward our north that we recognize today, it has to point the other direction. "And if it's already undergone this decoupling, this Dzhanibekov rotation is now somewhere wandering slowly in the North Pole would be in Southern Africa. Once the geomagnetic pole captures that Earth body, it'll snap it into its final position. And ECDO postulates that that snap, that final phase, is what indeed precipitated this high-energy displacement of the oceans." Jerm: "And thus the pyramids ended up underwater." Cunningham: "Correct. When we're in state two, most of the modelers right now they're modeling the viscosity of the mantle, they're modeling the ablate redistribution of the oceans, they're modeling the progression function for each of those. "In other words, none of that happens— Most of that doesn't happen immediately, the oceans do. They model the speed and the arrival of that, that turn, that Dzhanibekov turn. Most of them are finding that the height of the ocean about— in state two, our alternative rotation, equates just about that 597-foot-above-sea-level elevation that put the tidal banding mark on the Chephren pyramid. "So it's a very pleasing set of outcomes in the models so far. We got a long way to go on them, but the modelers are just doing absolute gangbuster work." Jerm: "Yeah, I mean so basically just the tips of the pyramids were sticking out?" Cunningham: "Yeah, both of them had their tips sticking out. I don't think that their construction at that level was an accident. I think the ancients wanted to tell us we know exactly how high the water's going to go. "This has happened so often and has been so consistent, we know how high the water is going to be. So we're going to build a device or set of devices that both tell you what we were looking at, and the three chambers inside Khufu tell you exactly what they were looking at. And we're going to give you these warning indicators that show the height of the flood, so that ancients know, and this agency that keeps us ignorant, there's no way they can unstack these 5 million stones in their effort to get rid of this. "In fact, I don't think they really understood. Most of their minions did not understand what had occurred, what these marks on top of the Chephren pyramid indicate, and fortunately so, or they would have cleaned up all of that. They would have removed those stones in short order had they known that this was indicative of a state 2 under ECDO theory title band."
5:59

MIND-BLOWING🤯 Systems engineer and author Roger Cunningham explains how a cataclysmic event caused global oceanic displacement ~7,000 years ago, inundating the Pyramids of Giza, which are actually "warning indicators" for future civilizations that the cataclysm will happen again In this clip from a UK Column (UK Column) interview with Jerm Warfare, Cunningham (Ethical Skeptic ☀) describes ECDO Theory (Exothermic Core-Mantle Decoupling – Dzhanibekov Oscillation), which is a hypothesis proposed by Cunningham that explains periodic catastrophic Earth changes through internal geophysical processes. The theory summarized, per Grok: "In simple terms: The Earth's solid iron-nickel core periodically undergoes exothermic (heat-releasing) phase changes in its crystal structure. This heat rises through the mantle into the oceans (contributing to climate shifts and deep-ocean warming), while also weakening the geomagnetic field that normally 'locks' the outer shell (crust + mantle) to the spinning core. "Once the magnetic grip weakens enough, the outer shell can decouple and rapidly reorient relative to the spin axis in a Dzhanibekov-like flip (the tennis-racket theorem effect seen in spinning objects). This causes a true polar wander of roughly 104° along a specific meridian, shifting the geographic poles, sloshing oceans to create global floods, realigning ancient monuments to a former pole position (e.g., in southern Africa), and triggering cataclysms recorded in myths and geology. The system then oscillates back to its current stable state once the core regenerates. "The theory unifies evidence from climate anomalies, ancient site alignments, paleomagnetic data, and flood legends into one cyclic mechanism, with implications for past civilization resets and potential future events." ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- Cunningham: "I wouldn't call Charles Hapgood's notion a theory because it didn't have the elements of hypothesis in it. But it's a cool idea. It's an excellent construct. And that's where you start when you develop hypotheses. You start with a construct. "He said that the outside body of the Earth, like the skin of an orange, rotates independently and presents a new surface to the North Star. His sighting was that caused the inundations. So that was the first thinking, really, that's centered around this type of idea. "What ECDO theory postulates is that this decoupling, instead of happening at the crust, where there really isn't a mechanism to decouple, and that really has been one of the things that's kept the theory squelched, is there's no viable mechanism there, the viable mechanism does exist at the core–mantle boundary. "In fact, it suggests that this is an absolutely stark potential, if you look at the core–mantle boundary, that's what ECDO proposes, that particular situation in the core–mantle boundary causes this outer rotational body to do an inertial interchange True Polar Wander. "A portion of that wander was smooth and gentle, within reason. I'm sure the oceans were a little more energetic, but a portion of it during the capture by an inverted geomagnetic pole, in other words, the magnetic pole's north pole was down in Antarctica when it was captured by that when our outer magnetite structure of the crust was captured by that pole, it was pulled into location very rapidly, and that's what precipitated these oceans to come up out of their banks. "It did exactly what the Gong Gong historians said. They said that the sky rolled from the southeast to the northwest. And that's exactly what the ECDO rotation presupposes. And we developed the rotation based on the geomechanics first. We didn't look at the myths. And then we went out and took that geo- rotation and said, okay, let's compare this rotation to the myths that are out there that are informative, like the Epic of Gilgamesh, like the Gong Gong theory, or the Gong Gong tradition. And in fact, they matched in the geostrata the location of the saline diatomaceous deserts that have aridified across the planet. They all match this ECDO rotation. "And that's what the six or eight modeling groups that are working on ECDO now, they're finding, unequivocally, a good match to the Earth's deserts, to this, this inundation and rotation." Jerm: "So that would have been quite a quick event?" Cunningham: "A portion of it, the capture. Right now, as we understand the differential inertial moments in the Earth, they're not large enough to cause a 12-hour or 18-hour rotation of the Earth in this— into this new position. However, if we introduce an inverted geomagnetic pole, the geomagnetic pole captures the Earth's shell and brings it into alignment with wherever it is. "Once the north magnetic pole makes its journey across Asia, the central body of Asia, and then through the Bay of Bengal and down into Antarctica below Africa, it reinvigorates, it re-strengthens its, its permeability or its polarity and captures the Earth's body. Except now the Earth instead of pointing toward our north that we recognize today, it has to point the other direction. "And if it's already undergone this decoupling, this Dzhanibekov rotation is now somewhere wandering slowly in the North Pole would be in Southern Africa. Once the geomagnetic pole captures that Earth body, it'll snap it into its final position. And ECDO postulates that that snap, that final phase, is what indeed precipitated this high-energy displacement of the oceans." Jerm: "And thus the pyramids ended up underwater." Cunningham: "Correct. When we're in state two, most of the modelers right now they're modeling the viscosity of the mantle, they're modeling the ablate redistribution of the oceans, they're modeling the progression function for each of those. "In other words, none of that happens— Most of that doesn't happen immediately, the oceans do. They model the speed and the arrival of that, that turn, that Dzhanibekov turn. Most of them are finding that the height of the ocean about— in state two, our alternative rotation, equates just about that 597-foot-above-sea-level elevation that put the tidal banding mark on the Chephren pyramid. "So it's a very pleasing set of outcomes in the models so far. We got a long way to go on them, but the modelers are just doing absolute gangbuster work." Jerm: "Yeah, I mean so basically just the tips of the pyramids were sticking out?" Cunningham: "Yeah, both of them had their tips sticking out. I don't think that their construction at that level was an accident. I think the ancients wanted to tell us we know exactly how high the water's going to go. "This has happened so often and has been so consistent, we know how high the water is going to be. So we're going to build a device or set of devices that both tell you what we were looking at, and the three chambers inside Khufu tell you exactly what they were looking at. And we're going to give you these warning indicators that show the height of the flood, so that ancients know, and this agency that keeps us ignorant, there's no way they can unstack these 5 million stones in their effort to get rid of this. "In fact, I don't think they really understood. Most of their minions did not understand what had occurred, what these marks on top of the Chephren pyramid indicate, and fortunately so, or they would have cleaned up all of that. They would have removed those stones in short order had they known that this was indicative of a state 2 under ECDO theory title band."

Sense Receptor

28,883 次观看 • 1 个月前

The Earth axis of rotation changes 104 degrees every 6500 years (or so)... and fast. How do we know? - cycling of the geomagnetic field shifts the stable axis of rotation from Polaris over the Arctic to the gyroscopic stable axis over southeastern Africa - hundreds of massive human monuments (e.g., Nazca lines) dating prior to the last axis change are aligned with Polaris as if it were positioned over Africa - evidence of the massive flooding that would have resulted from the change is found in the great deserts of the world, and on the pyramids of Giza - those same pyramids are constructed with dual orientation, such that the could observe thru shafts both positions of Polaris, exactly 104 degrees apart All human beings today are descendants of the several thousand to have survived the last ECDO change, about 7,000 years ago, when most of the world was flooded with cold water. The earliest signs that another shift is imminent are acceleration of the movement of the magnetic North Pole and a rapid warming of the oceans -- both caused by changes in the structure of the iron core inside the Earth. Roger Cunningham Ethical Skeptic ☀ explains ECDO theory in this X-episode of Uncommon Living podcast.
1:19:17

The Earth axis of rotation changes 104 degrees every 6500 years (or so)... and fast. How do we know? - cycling of the geomagnetic field shifts the stable axis of rotation from Polaris over the Arctic to the gyroscopic stable axis over southeastern Africa - hundreds of massive human monuments (e.g., Nazca lines) dating prior to the last axis change are aligned with Polaris as if it were positioned over Africa - evidence of the massive flooding that would have resulted from the change is found in the great deserts of the world, and on the pyramids of Giza - those same pyramids are constructed with dual orientation, such that the could observe thru shafts both positions of Polaris, exactly 104 degrees apart All human beings today are descendants of the several thousand to have survived the last ECDO change, about 7,000 years ago, when most of the world was flooded with cold water. The earliest signs that another shift is imminent are acceleration of the movement of the magnetic North Pole and a rapid warming of the oceans -- both caused by changes in the structure of the iron core inside the Earth. Roger Cunningham Ethical Skeptic ☀ explains ECDO theory in this X-episode of Uncommon Living podcast.

Thomas P Seager, PhD

77,197 次观看 • 6 天前

Joe Rogan flips the God debate on its head with shocking theory that 'we created him' | Chris Melore, Daily Mail Joe Rogan has come to a mind-bending conclusion about life, fearing that humanity has misinterpreted what reality is and we're actually in the process of creating God. While interviewing computer scientist Roman Yampolskiy on the Joe Rogan Experience podcast, the men debated the possibility that reality is a giant simulation and humans are building a God-like supercomputer using artificial intelligence (AI). According to Rogan's theory, humanity has misinterpreted ancient prophecies regarding the second coming of Jesus Christ and Judgement Day, saying the creation of this AI super intelligence is the final chapter before our reality resets. 'This whole idea of Jesus coming back, well maybe it's real. Maybe we just completely misinterpreted these ancient scrolls and texts and what it really means is that we are going to give birth to this,' Rogan explained. Yampolskiy, an author and researcher in AI safety, added to Rogan's theory, suggesting that reality is just an ongoing cycle of Big Bangs - the explosion that kickstarted the universe - starting and restarting life over and over again. During the episode released on July 3, Rogan added that he feared God 'is actually created by human beings creating this infinitely intelligent thing that can essentially harness all of the available energy and power of the universe and create anything it wants.' Yampolskiy even contended that many of the religions around the world have one thing in common: 'What they all agree on is that there is [a] super intelligence which created a fake world.' In previous podcasts episodes this year, Rogan has repeatedly warned that AI was just years away from reaching a God-like state as more tech companies pour resources into its development. Rogan asked Yampolskiy if the physical world we see was created by God, then what existed before this all-powerful being created the human race. 'Ideas, just information,' the computer scientist replied during the podcast. 'Just God. God was bored And it was like, let's make some animals that can think and solve problems. And for what reason?' Rogan countered. That's when the podcast host theorized life was an ongoing simulation and people had the idea of God's return to Earth backwards, claiming that people would summon this powerful intelligence themselves through the creation of AI. The theory that all life exists within a computer simulation has been debated for decades, and it's even been entertained in blockbuster movies like 'The Matrix.' While Rogan suggested that deepfakes of Bigfoot, UFOs, and other impossible images could be proof we're living in a virtual reality, scientists have argued that there is more basic evidence that this world is not real. Melvin Vopson, an associate professor in physics at the University of Portsmouth, has argued that gravity may be a sign that we're all living in a virtual simulation. According to Vopson's new paper in AIP Advances, our universe is the 'ultimate computer' and gravity's pull on Earth and in outer space is the computer trying to keep its vast amount of data organized. As for who's running the simulation, Yampolskiy explained that one possibility is life as we know it could simply be a replay of past events being examined by the future human race. Rogan then asked Yampolskiy why an all-powerful AI would even bother creating a reality for our consciousnesses to exist in. Yampolskiy explained that it's impossible to know who is controlling this program, whether it's an alien intelligence, humans from the future, or an AI super intelligence has already been built and is running these simulations by itself. Therefore, it's also impossible to know why people would be needed in the virtual world, adding that he and Rogan could have had the same interview thousands of times and never knew it was happening. 'Is it entertainment? Is it scientific experimentation? Is it marketing? Maybe somebody managed to control them and [are] trying to figure out what Starbucks coffee sells best. And they need to run [an] earth-sized simulation to see what sells best,' Yampolskiy explained. 'Think about this decade... We're about to invent intelligence and virtual worlds, God-like inventions. We're here. There's a good chance that's not just random,' the AI researcher added, suggesting we're already stuck in a computer simulation. In any scenario, Rogan theorized that the end of the simulation was nearing as tech giants get closer to creating the all-knowing intelligence which has been foretold in many prophecies. Read more:
1:11

Joe Rogan flips the God debate on its head with shocking theory that 'we created him' | Chris Melore, Daily Mail Joe Rogan has come to a mind-bending conclusion about life, fearing that humanity has misinterpreted what reality is and we're actually in the process of creating God. While interviewing computer scientist Roman Yampolskiy on the Joe Rogan Experience podcast, the men debated the possibility that reality is a giant simulation and humans are building a God-like supercomputer using artificial intelligence (AI). According to Rogan's theory, humanity has misinterpreted ancient prophecies regarding the second coming of Jesus Christ and Judgement Day, saying the creation of this AI super intelligence is the final chapter before our reality resets. 'This whole idea of Jesus coming back, well maybe it's real. Maybe we just completely misinterpreted these ancient scrolls and texts and what it really means is that we are going to give birth to this,' Rogan explained. Yampolskiy, an author and researcher in AI safety, added to Rogan's theory, suggesting that reality is just an ongoing cycle of Big Bangs - the explosion that kickstarted the universe - starting and restarting life over and over again. During the episode released on July 3, Rogan added that he feared God 'is actually created by human beings creating this infinitely intelligent thing that can essentially harness all of the available energy and power of the universe and create anything it wants.' Yampolskiy even contended that many of the religions around the world have one thing in common: 'What they all agree on is that there is [a] super intelligence which created a fake world.' In previous podcasts episodes this year, Rogan has repeatedly warned that AI was just years away from reaching a God-like state as more tech companies pour resources into its development. Rogan asked Yampolskiy if the physical world we see was created by God, then what existed before this all-powerful being created the human race. 'Ideas, just information,' the computer scientist replied during the podcast. 'Just God. God was bored And it was like, let's make some animals that can think and solve problems. And for what reason?' Rogan countered. That's when the podcast host theorized life was an ongoing simulation and people had the idea of God's return to Earth backwards, claiming that people would summon this powerful intelligence themselves through the creation of AI. The theory that all life exists within a computer simulation has been debated for decades, and it's even been entertained in blockbuster movies like 'The Matrix.' While Rogan suggested that deepfakes of Bigfoot, UFOs, and other impossible images could be proof we're living in a virtual reality, scientists have argued that there is more basic evidence that this world is not real. Melvin Vopson, an associate professor in physics at the University of Portsmouth, has argued that gravity may be a sign that we're all living in a virtual simulation. According to Vopson's new paper in AIP Advances, our universe is the 'ultimate computer' and gravity's pull on Earth and in outer space is the computer trying to keep its vast amount of data organized. As for who's running the simulation, Yampolskiy explained that one possibility is life as we know it could simply be a replay of past events being examined by the future human race. Rogan then asked Yampolskiy why an all-powerful AI would even bother creating a reality for our consciousnesses to exist in. Yampolskiy explained that it's impossible to know who is controlling this program, whether it's an alien intelligence, humans from the future, or an AI super intelligence has already been built and is running these simulations by itself. Therefore, it's also impossible to know why people would be needed in the virtual world, adding that he and Rogan could have had the same interview thousands of times and never knew it was happening. 'Is it entertainment? Is it scientific experimentation? Is it marketing? Maybe somebody managed to control them and [are] trying to figure out what Starbucks coffee sells best. And they need to run [an] earth-sized simulation to see what sells best,' Yampolskiy explained. 'Think about this decade... We're about to invent intelligence and virtual worlds, God-like inventions. We're here. There's a good chance that's not just random,' the AI researcher added, suggesting we're already stuck in a computer simulation. In any scenario, Rogan theorized that the end of the simulation was nearing as tech giants get closer to creating the all-knowing intelligence which has been foretold in many prophecies. Read more:

Owen Gregorian

392,573 次观看 • 1 年前

In the words of your own experts "There is NO experiment to prove that the earth is in motion." You just choose to BELIEVE IT, as a direct result of the Copernican principle. 📍 Cool, but difficult thought process. Right? I mean, that's, that's essentially what's happening when you're on a plane. I mean, if you're throwing a ball up in the air and catching it on the plane, it's happening at a much smaller scale, right? Yeah. Yeah. I mean, you're flying at whatever, 600 miles an hour relative to the ground. Yeah. But it doesn't seem, but seem like it when you're sitting there. Yeah. And Einstein elevated that to a principle and said, if you're moving at, if you're not accelerating, you're just moving at a constant speed in a plane or now. I mean, that's essentially what we're doing now. We're. Moving around the sun effectively, constant speed, then you can't tell. So there's no experiment you can do. We could look at the decay of a radioactive nuclear, so some electricity and magnetism, or bounce a ball, have a pendulum, whatever it is, and there's no experiment you can do to tell you whether you're moving or not. Therefore, that concept has no meaning because you can't measure it. And that that's led Einstein to relativity. I'm gonna really drive this home for the last three minutes. Einstein, Hubble Hawking, Arthur Edington, you name 'em. You name 'em, Wolfgang Polly. They all explain. You can't prove that the earth is moving from the Earth. You cannot including stellar aberration. And they will tell you point blank that they can create a model for you that explains alleged parallax, which doesn't actually happen. Retrograde motion. Stellar aberration, all in a geocentric model with the earth stationary, and you cannot prove that it's spinning or revolving on the, the earth itself. It's impossible. Stephen Hawking in 2007 explained it quoting Einstein from his writings in special and general theory, relativity his paper on the combined two theories explaining that you cannot prove that the Earth is spinning. They choose to believe in the Copernican principle because they have a religion that triggers people because they, they think they hate religion. They, they hate God oftentimes. But that is a religion. It's a belief system built upon the doctrine of men void, of empirical, verifiable evidence, and in fact, contrary and antithetical to the actual evidence, despite what the evidence says. I just now read him point blank, say, it can never be disproven. We disregard that possibility because of the horror of a special and unique position. Right, and I have plenty of quotes here from Georis or Heliocentric explaining. You can never prove it. You can't prove that the Earth is STA or that the earth is not stationary. But we don't want to believe that because that would mean the Earth is special. So then what do we do? We go look out at the background distribution, the energy coming away from the earth that shows the Earth's in the center. So what do they do? They call it the axis of evil. Then they come up with a new idea. Well, oh, it does look like we're the center. But that must mean that no matter where you are in the universe, it would look like you're in the center or we're just in the center. That they don't want to say what it is because it has spiritual implications. It has philosophical ramifications. And that is that the earth had to be placed there. It has a special, unique position. They want you, they want to believe that there are a time spec of dust and ever expanding universe of nothingness for everything came from nothing and there's a preexisting energy. Let's not talk about that part. Oh, lightning struck al soup and all this nonsense and And you know why? That's a good question. Probably 'cause they're scared. Scared of like moral accountability, I would guess. But this is the point. This is the problem. It is portrayed as science and we're brainwashing, indoctrinated with this idea as if it is science and it's proven and it's not questionable when you actually go look behind the curtain. It's philosophy and they admit it. So I, that's why I gave specific quotes and it was walked past us. The crux of the whole issue. There is a philosophy that leads to atheism and nihilism and materialism portrayed onto the world as if it is in fact scientific fact. You can't prove that the earth is moving. If the earth is the ball that spins with the objectively isn't. We falsified it. Everything gives us the illusion.
3:41

In the words of your own experts "There is NO experiment to prove that the earth is in motion." You just choose to BELIEVE IT, as a direct result of the Copernican principle. 📍 Cool, but difficult thought process. Right? I mean, that's, that's essentially what's happening when you're on a plane. I mean, if you're throwing a ball up in the air and catching it on the plane, it's happening at a much smaller scale, right? Yeah. Yeah. I mean, you're flying at whatever, 600 miles an hour relative to the ground. Yeah. But it doesn't seem, but seem like it when you're sitting there. Yeah. And Einstein elevated that to a principle and said, if you're moving at, if you're not accelerating, you're just moving at a constant speed in a plane or now. I mean, that's essentially what we're doing now. We're. Moving around the sun effectively, constant speed, then you can't tell. So there's no experiment you can do. We could look at the decay of a radioactive nuclear, so some electricity and magnetism, or bounce a ball, have a pendulum, whatever it is, and there's no experiment you can do to tell you whether you're moving or not. Therefore, that concept has no meaning because you can't measure it. And that that's led Einstein to relativity. I'm gonna really drive this home for the last three minutes. Einstein, Hubble Hawking, Arthur Edington, you name 'em. You name 'em, Wolfgang Polly. They all explain. You can't prove that the earth is moving from the Earth. You cannot including stellar aberration. And they will tell you point blank that they can create a model for you that explains alleged parallax, which doesn't actually happen. Retrograde motion. Stellar aberration, all in a geocentric model with the earth stationary, and you cannot prove that it's spinning or revolving on the, the earth itself. It's impossible. Stephen Hawking in 2007 explained it quoting Einstein from his writings in special and general theory, relativity his paper on the combined two theories explaining that you cannot prove that the Earth is spinning. They choose to believe in the Copernican principle because they have a religion that triggers people because they, they think they hate religion. They, they hate God oftentimes. But that is a religion. It's a belief system built upon the doctrine of men void, of empirical, verifiable evidence, and in fact, contrary and antithetical to the actual evidence, despite what the evidence says. I just now read him point blank, say, it can never be disproven. We disregard that possibility because of the horror of a special and unique position. Right, and I have plenty of quotes here from Georis or Heliocentric explaining. You can never prove it. You can't prove that the Earth is STA or that the earth is not stationary. But we don't want to believe that because that would mean the Earth is special. So then what do we do? We go look out at the background distribution, the energy coming away from the earth that shows the Earth's in the center. So what do they do? They call it the axis of evil. Then they come up with a new idea. Well, oh, it does look like we're the center. But that must mean that no matter where you are in the universe, it would look like you're in the center or we're just in the center. That they don't want to say what it is because it has spiritual implications. It has philosophical ramifications. And that is that the earth had to be placed there. It has a special, unique position. They want you, they want to believe that there are a time spec of dust and ever expanding universe of nothingness for everything came from nothing and there's a preexisting energy. Let's not talk about that part. Oh, lightning struck al soup and all this nonsense and And you know why? That's a good question. Probably 'cause they're scared. Scared of like moral accountability, I would guess. But this is the point. This is the problem. It is portrayed as science and we're brainwashing, indoctrinated with this idea as if it is science and it's proven and it's not questionable when you actually go look behind the curtain. It's philosophy and they admit it. So I, that's why I gave specific quotes and it was walked past us. The crux of the whole issue. There is a philosophy that leads to atheism and nihilism and materialism portrayed onto the world as if it is in fact scientific fact. You can't prove that the earth is moving. If the earth is the ball that spins with the objectively isn't. We falsified it. Everything gives us the illusion.

Shane St Pierre

54,527 次观看 • 1 年前

🌍⚡️ Yesterday Earth’s “Heartbeat” Changed — & We Should ALL Pay Attention ⚡️🌍 Friends, I want to share something important — and this time, I want to ground it firmly in science! Scientists have long known that Earth is surrounded by a natural electromagnetic field called the SCHUMANN RESONANCE. It forms between the planet’s surface and the ionosphere, creating a set of standing waves that constantly pulse around the globe. This is NOT some kind of fringe theory. NASA has studied it. Universities have published on it. Peer-reviewed research confirms it. What fascinates me is this: the primary frequencies of the Schumann Resonance closely OVERLAP with human brainwave activity — especially those associated with calm focus, creativity, intuition, emotional processing & states of expanded awareness. In other words, human biology EVOLVED and specifically adapted to operate inside Earth’s electromagnetic rhythm. We are literally TUNED to the planet that is our home. Studies have shown that disruptions or changes in these background frequencies can influence sleep cycles, mood, stress levels, cognitive performance & nervous system regulation. Astronauts, for example, experienced physiological disorientation until artificial Schumann frequencies were recreated in spacecraft. This suggests something profound: Earth’s electromagnetic environment is not just background noise — it is a BIOLOGICAL REGULATOR. Recently, instruments detected an UNUSUAL FLUCTUATION in this system. Not the kind typically caused by weather or solar storms, but a distinct, structured change that stood out precisely because of its clarity. Now here is where I lean forward. This fluctuation occurred during the same narrow window that 3I/ATLAS — an interstellar object from beyond our solar system — passed by and was at it’s closest to Earth yesterday! As I told you in my previous post, I believe 3I/ATLAS is an interstellar TRANSMITTOR and that its mission is to emit a specific frequency that helps to create a shift in consciousness! So, I believe that yesterday’s fluctuation in the Schuman Resonance is a moment that truly matters! Why? Because I believe that changes in the Earth’s electromagnetic field can act as a global SYNCHRONISING MECHANISM — subtly influencing collective perception, awareness & our readiness for new ideas! The long-withheld truth about non-human intelligence & unexplained aerial phenomena is approaching a point of release. DISCLOSURE is no longer theoretical — it is structural, psychological & cultural. Before humanity can absorb a larger truth, the nervous system must adapt. And the planet itself may be helping us do that. Watch the skies — yes. But also tune in to the heartbeat of “MOTHER EARTH” Go outside and GROUND yourself. Spend time in nature! Take off your shoes and feel the grass or soil or sand beneath your feet. And then just feel and listen to the pulsating frequencies of the Earth. Its heartbeat tells a story. 🌍✨ and thanks soooo much for all the birthday messages you sent me bless you all💓💓💓💓💓💓💓💓💓💓💓 #UAP #ufotwitter #Aliens #uaptwitter #3IATLAS
0:47

🌍⚡️ Yesterday Earth’s “Heartbeat” Changed — & We Should ALL Pay Attention ⚡️🌍 Friends, I want to share something important — and this time, I want to ground it firmly in science! Scientists have long known that Earth is surrounded by a natural electromagnetic field called the SCHUMANN RESONANCE. It forms between the planet’s surface and the ionosphere, creating a set of standing waves that constantly pulse around the globe. This is NOT some kind of fringe theory. NASA has studied it. Universities have published on it. Peer-reviewed research confirms it. What fascinates me is this: the primary frequencies of the Schumann Resonance closely OVERLAP with human brainwave activity — especially those associated with calm focus, creativity, intuition, emotional processing & states of expanded awareness. In other words, human biology EVOLVED and specifically adapted to operate inside Earth’s electromagnetic rhythm. We are literally TUNED to the planet that is our home. Studies have shown that disruptions or changes in these background frequencies can influence sleep cycles, mood, stress levels, cognitive performance & nervous system regulation. Astronauts, for example, experienced physiological disorientation until artificial Schumann frequencies were recreated in spacecraft. This suggests something profound: Earth’s electromagnetic environment is not just background noise — it is a BIOLOGICAL REGULATOR. Recently, instruments detected an UNUSUAL FLUCTUATION in this system. Not the kind typically caused by weather or solar storms, but a distinct, structured change that stood out precisely because of its clarity. Now here is where I lean forward. This fluctuation occurred during the same narrow window that 3I/ATLAS — an interstellar object from beyond our solar system — passed by and was at it’s closest to Earth yesterday! As I told you in my previous post, I believe 3I/ATLAS is an interstellar TRANSMITTOR and that its mission is to emit a specific frequency that helps to create a shift in consciousness! So, I believe that yesterday’s fluctuation in the Schuman Resonance is a moment that truly matters! Why? Because I believe that changes in the Earth’s electromagnetic field can act as a global SYNCHRONISING MECHANISM — subtly influencing collective perception, awareness & our readiness for new ideas! The long-withheld truth about non-human intelligence & unexplained aerial phenomena is approaching a point of release. DISCLOSURE is no longer theoretical — it is structural, psychological & cultural. Before humanity can absorb a larger truth, the nervous system must adapt. And the planet itself may be helping us do that. Watch the skies — yes. But also tune in to the heartbeat of “MOTHER EARTH” Go outside and GROUND yourself. Spend time in nature! Take off your shoes and feel the grass or soil or sand beneath your feet. And then just feel and listen to the pulsating frequencies of the Earth. Its heartbeat tells a story. 🌍✨ and thanks soooo much for all the birthday messages you sent me bless you all💓💓💓💓💓💓💓💓💓💓💓 #UAP #ufotwitter #Aliens #uaptwitter #3IATLAS

Uri Geller

63,122 次观看 • 7 个月前

Dr. Michael Yeadon Exposes the Foundational Lie of Climate Alarmism What if everything you’ve been told about climate change is not just exaggerated, but a deliberate, orchestrated lie? Former Pfizer VP & Chief Scientist Dr. Michael Yeadon delivers a stunning, evidence-based takedown of the climate change narrative that will make you question everything. He begins by tracing the origins. “If you do nothing else, have a look at the Club of Rome, the Trilateral Commission,” Dr. Yeadon states. “Honestly, things like climate change and pandemic diseases were decided to be used by people concerned about population... They decided at the same time to frighten you with diseases and changes to climate. It's the same group of people at the same time. And after that, there was a diaspora of propaganda.” But what about the science? Dr. Yeadon, an expert in parsing complex data, did his own research. “I found at least three or four people who've spent longer in atmospheric science than I've spent in pharma R&D. And there is no question that there is no significant change to the climate since pre-industrial times.” He dismantles the core data itself. “Where do you think they got the temperature data from when there were virtually no thermometers? They weren't calibrated. No one checked the records. This idea that they know it's 1.5 degrees warmer? It's a lie.” Then, he goes for the jugular: the alleged link between CO2 and temperature. “There is no connection between CO2 in the air and the temperature of the surface... We don't live in a greenhouse. A greenhouse is a closed system. Our atmosphere is open; energy radiates back into space.” The proof? Ice core data. “What several independent groups all show is that changes in temperature ALWAYS preceded change in atmospheric CO2. CO2 moves in response to temperature. Warm water holds less CO2. Everyone knows a warm fizzy drink goes flat. It’s basic science.” His conclusion is unequivocal: “When the Earth warms due to changes in solar output or orbital cycles, the CO2 movement takes place afterwards. All of this fear-mongering about burning fossil fuels adding CO2 and changing the climate? It is a lie. They're lying to you to frighten you and to get you to accept restrictions on your life.” This isn’t a conspiracy theory. It’s a call for intellectual honesty from a renowned scientist. It’s time to stop being frightened by a crisis that doesn’t exist. Share if you’re ready to question the narrative. Follow for more unflinching analysis from world-class experts.
3:36

Dr. Michael Yeadon Exposes the Foundational Lie of Climate Alarmism What if everything you’ve been told about climate change is not just exaggerated, but a deliberate, orchestrated lie? Former Pfizer VP & Chief Scientist Dr. Michael Yeadon delivers a stunning, evidence-based takedown of the climate change narrative that will make you question everything. He begins by tracing the origins. “If you do nothing else, have a look at the Club of Rome, the Trilateral Commission,” Dr. Yeadon states. “Honestly, things like climate change and pandemic diseases were decided to be used by people concerned about population... They decided at the same time to frighten you with diseases and changes to climate. It's the same group of people at the same time. And after that, there was a diaspora of propaganda.” But what about the science? Dr. Yeadon, an expert in parsing complex data, did his own research. “I found at least three or four people who've spent longer in atmospheric science than I've spent in pharma R&D. And there is no question that there is no significant change to the climate since pre-industrial times.” He dismantles the core data itself. “Where do you think they got the temperature data from when there were virtually no thermometers? They weren't calibrated. No one checked the records. This idea that they know it's 1.5 degrees warmer? It's a lie.” Then, he goes for the jugular: the alleged link between CO2 and temperature. “There is no connection between CO2 in the air and the temperature of the surface... We don't live in a greenhouse. A greenhouse is a closed system. Our atmosphere is open; energy radiates back into space.” The proof? Ice core data. “What several independent groups all show is that changes in temperature ALWAYS preceded change in atmospheric CO2. CO2 moves in response to temperature. Warm water holds less CO2. Everyone knows a warm fizzy drink goes flat. It’s basic science.” His conclusion is unequivocal: “When the Earth warms due to changes in solar output or orbital cycles, the CO2 movement takes place afterwards. All of this fear-mongering about burning fossil fuels adding CO2 and changing the climate? It is a lie. They're lying to you to frighten you and to get you to accept restrictions on your life.” This isn’t a conspiracy theory. It’s a call for intellectual honesty from a renowned scientist. It’s time to stop being frightened by a crisis that doesn’t exist. Share if you’re ready to question the narrative. Follow for more unflinching analysis from world-class experts.

Camus

20,811 次观看 • 11 个月前

I’m seeing a lot of questions on the launch of China’s Chang’e 6 mission yesterday to get samples - for the first time - from the far side of the moon. We don’t know (afaik) why specifically they’re doing that, but we have a pretty good idea what grand vision China is working towards with their space program. How? From this 2022 video by Chas Freeman (former Assistant Secretary of Defense and Nixon's interpreter during his era-defining 1972 China visit), who imho is undoubtedly one of the most knowledgeable former US officials on China. He says that according to his own discussions with people running China’s space program, they’re following the vision described in the book "The high frontier" by Gerard K. O'Neill, which Freeman says has "become the bible of the Chinese space program". I read the book. So what vision does it describe? The book was written in 1976 by O'Neill who was a professor of physics at Princeton University. He also founded the Space Studies Institute, an organization devoted to funding research into space manufacturing and colonization. In other words, he knew his stuff. The book makes the very fair point that we have massive resource constraints on earth, especially given the growing population. He estimated in 1976 that we should be "about six and a half billion people in the year 2000", and we were 6.114 billion back then so he was pretty prescient. He estimates that these constraints will progressively give rise to more and more social tensions as the growing earth population competes for our limited resources as well as faces global problems like climate change. In his view, dealing with this will either require "an authoritarian regime capable of mounting the immense task of social reorganization needed to escape catastrophe" or, alternatively, “mankind would [need to adopt] a static society [that would be] forced in self-defense to suppress new ideas". The 3rd alternative is of course the colonization of space. The most interesting aspect of the book is that he claims everything he writes is feasible with knowledge and technology that already existed in the late 70s. In short he calls for the establishment of large human habitats in the Earth-Moon system, located at stable Lagrange points ("parking spots" in space where gravity from different spatial bodies cancel each other out). In particular he developed the concept of what's known today as the "O'Neill cylinder" which he says "could support quite easily a population of ten million people, growing its food in agricultural cylinders near but outside the main habitat". Energy-wise, it'd simply make use of solar energy via a system of mirrors. As he describes it: "the concentration of the unvarying, intense sunlight of space by very lightweight, inexpensive mirrors can provide all the energy that industry will ever need [...] at a fraction of a cent per kilowatt-hour". He envisages building these habitats with material from the moon, shot into space via "mass drivers", a form of electromagnetic catapult. Also "the habitats would have artificial gravity similar as that of earth by rotating about twenty-eight times an hour”, but he also envisages low-gravity areas, especially for recreational activities such as swimming pools or dancing representations. To trade with earth, he develops the idea of beaming solar power back to earth via "microwave from solar power stations in orbit". As he describes it "the microwave beam would arrive at Earth with a beam width of about seven kilometers. Its intensity would be modest, less than half that of sunlight. In contrast to sunlight, though, it would be there all the time, even at night or in clouds or rain, and it would be in a form ready for conversion to DC current with a loss of only 10 percent. The areas receiving these beams’ output on Earth would be fenced, and outside the fence the intensity of microwave radiation would be no higher than outside a microwave oven with the door closed. He estimates that if "Satellite Solar Power Stations (SSPS) were to become the sole source of electric energy in the United States in the year 2000, the land area necessary for the SSPS antennas would still be only 0.2 percent of that of the continental United States". In short, the establishment of space colonies could lead to the fulfillment of a good share of Earth's energy needs. Last but not least he describes life in space habitats as better than that of earth, largely thanks to the level of control we'd have over the environment (total climate control which would enable an abundance of food and no natural disaster) as well as unlimited cheap energy. To conclude, Chas Freeman typically really knows his stuff when it comes to China and he’s very intellectually honest (a rare trait among US officials) so I have no doubt he tells the truth when he says the Chinese told him that was the vision. And China famously thinks very big and very long term so it would be quite like them to go for something like this. There are also quite a few tangible signs that China is working towards that vision. See for instance this November 2022 news where “China’s space station will join a project to collect solar power from space and send it to Earth in a high-energy microwave beam”: That’s exactly O’Neill’s vision! Or check this October 2022 news that says China is developing new "electromagnetic sledges" that can propel a carriage weighing a few tonnes to a record speed, with a key application for this being “aerospace”: Remember: O’Neill’s vision is to build his habitats with material from the moon, shot into space via "mass drivers", a form of electromagnetic catapult. So there you go… Or also the fact that the Chinese will build, together with the Russians, a moon base - planned for 2028 - powered by a “space nuclear reactor” that’s already been developed (on Earth) and has passed review by China’s Ministry of Science: The space nuclear reactor can generate 1MW of electricity, enough to power 10 International Space Stations. Enough power, maybe, to undertake mining activity and power an electromagnetic catapult… After visions change, the world changes, so it’s also possible that China’s view on what they want to do has evolved. In any case, Chas Freeman is right that China’s motivation for all its initiatives in space can’t just be to “boldly explore where no-one has been before”, they have to be working towards something. And Freeman is also absolutely right to lament that the U.S. decided to ban any cooperation in space with the Chinese. Those endeavors are something that could have been jointly developed as a multilateral effort to unite us all as a species… Instead China is now forced to go at it alone with Russia and we face a future where our petty divisions on Earth will be carried with us to space…
3:58

I’m seeing a lot of questions on the launch of China’s Chang’e 6 mission yesterday to get samples - for the first time - from the far side of the moon. We don’t know (afaik) why specifically they’re doing that, but we have a pretty good idea what grand vision China is working towards with their space program. How? From this 2022 video by Chas Freeman (former Assistant Secretary of Defense and Nixon's interpreter during his era-defining 1972 China visit), who imho is undoubtedly one of the most knowledgeable former US officials on China. He says that according to his own discussions with people running China’s space program, they’re following the vision described in the book "The high frontier" by Gerard K. O'Neill, which Freeman says has "become the bible of the Chinese space program". I read the book. So what vision does it describe? The book was written in 1976 by O'Neill who was a professor of physics at Princeton University. He also founded the Space Studies Institute, an organization devoted to funding research into space manufacturing and colonization. In other words, he knew his stuff. The book makes the very fair point that we have massive resource constraints on earth, especially given the growing population. He estimated in 1976 that we should be "about six and a half billion people in the year 2000", and we were 6.114 billion back then so he was pretty prescient. He estimates that these constraints will progressively give rise to more and more social tensions as the growing earth population competes for our limited resources as well as faces global problems like climate change. In his view, dealing with this will either require "an authoritarian regime capable of mounting the immense task of social reorganization needed to escape catastrophe" or, alternatively, “mankind would [need to adopt] a static society [that would be] forced in self-defense to suppress new ideas". The 3rd alternative is of course the colonization of space. The most interesting aspect of the book is that he claims everything he writes is feasible with knowledge and technology that already existed in the late 70s. In short he calls for the establishment of large human habitats in the Earth-Moon system, located at stable Lagrange points ("parking spots" in space where gravity from different spatial bodies cancel each other out). In particular he developed the concept of what's known today as the "O'Neill cylinder" which he says "could support quite easily a population of ten million people, growing its food in agricultural cylinders near but outside the main habitat". Energy-wise, it'd simply make use of solar energy via a system of mirrors. As he describes it: "the concentration of the unvarying, intense sunlight of space by very lightweight, inexpensive mirrors can provide all the energy that industry will ever need [...] at a fraction of a cent per kilowatt-hour". He envisages building these habitats with material from the moon, shot into space via "mass drivers", a form of electromagnetic catapult. Also "the habitats would have artificial gravity similar as that of earth by rotating about twenty-eight times an hour”, but he also envisages low-gravity areas, especially for recreational activities such as swimming pools or dancing representations. To trade with earth, he develops the idea of beaming solar power back to earth via "microwave from solar power stations in orbit". As he describes it "the microwave beam would arrive at Earth with a beam width of about seven kilometers. Its intensity would be modest, less than half that of sunlight. In contrast to sunlight, though, it would be there all the time, even at night or in clouds or rain, and it would be in a form ready for conversion to DC current with a loss of only 10 percent. The areas receiving these beams’ output on Earth would be fenced, and outside the fence the intensity of microwave radiation would be no higher than outside a microwave oven with the door closed. He estimates that if "Satellite Solar Power Stations (SSPS) were to become the sole source of electric energy in the United States in the year 2000, the land area necessary for the SSPS antennas would still be only 0.2 percent of that of the continental United States". In short, the establishment of space colonies could lead to the fulfillment of a good share of Earth's energy needs. Last but not least he describes life in space habitats as better than that of earth, largely thanks to the level of control we'd have over the environment (total climate control which would enable an abundance of food and no natural disaster) as well as unlimited cheap energy. To conclude, Chas Freeman typically really knows his stuff when it comes to China and he’s very intellectually honest (a rare trait among US officials) so I have no doubt he tells the truth when he says the Chinese told him that was the vision. And China famously thinks very big and very long term so it would be quite like them to go for something like this. There are also quite a few tangible signs that China is working towards that vision. See for instance this November 2022 news where “China’s space station will join a project to collect solar power from space and send it to Earth in a high-energy microwave beam”: That’s exactly O’Neill’s vision! Or check this October 2022 news that says China is developing new "electromagnetic sledges" that can propel a carriage weighing a few tonnes to a record speed, with a key application for this being “aerospace”: Remember: O’Neill’s vision is to build his habitats with material from the moon, shot into space via "mass drivers", a form of electromagnetic catapult. So there you go… Or also the fact that the Chinese will build, together with the Russians, a moon base - planned for 2028 - powered by a “space nuclear reactor” that’s already been developed (on Earth) and has passed review by China’s Ministry of Science: The space nuclear reactor can generate 1MW of electricity, enough to power 10 International Space Stations. Enough power, maybe, to undertake mining activity and power an electromagnetic catapult… After visions change, the world changes, so it’s also possible that China’s view on what they want to do has evolved. In any case, Chas Freeman is right that China’s motivation for all its initiatives in space can’t just be to “boldly explore where no-one has been before”, they have to be working towards something. And Freeman is also absolutely right to lament that the U.S. decided to ban any cooperation in space with the Chinese. Those endeavors are something that could have been jointly developed as a multilateral effort to unite us all as a species… Instead China is now forced to go at it alone with Russia and we face a future where our petty divisions on Earth will be carried with us to space…

Arnaud Bertrand

265,181 次观看 • 2 年前

Thought experiment for people regarding the concept of Absolute Time. Absolute means NO EXCEPTIONS. We are NOT looking back in time when we see galaxies and stars. We are NOT looking back in time 1.25 seconds when we see the moon. We're Not looking back in time 3 minutes when we see Mars. We're Not looking back in time 8.33 minutes when we see the Sun. If an astronaut lit a matchstick on Mars, the distant observer would see predator heat waves at the top of the matchstick in real-time while the matchstick started to blacken towards the astronaut's fingers. But there would be no orange light from that chemical reaction or flame seen. If the matchstick burnt out before the packet of orange light from that particular chemical reaction made it to Earth… then the distant observer would just see a disembodied orange flash of light with a lag. But the Earth-bound observer would never actually see the flame associated with the orange wavelength it put out. The wavelength of color emitted by the flame is not a recording of reality. If the orange light is 650 Thz, that means there are 650 trillion individual and separate bursts of orange light pulsating in 1 second. NOT that "the same light" is "waving" 650 trillion times a second and that light is a recording of reality. There are 650 trillion brand-new lights flashing in 1 second. Each Hertz is a brand-new emission and packet unto itself. Time does not re-emit 650 trillion times a second, nor is a photon a particle or a packet of reality acting like the frame of a reel of footage. The orange light that already left the flame will continue to propagate out until it meets the electrons making up the distant observer. But remember, it is never the same light within that packet. And the electrons making up the observer will absorb all of those different lights within that packet and re-emit brand-new lights that produce the product of illumination. A photon is a massless packet of energy, spherically expanding at the rate of c from the source it comes from. Illumination is the result of that energy being absorbed and RE-emitted by any other electrons that did not output that primary packet. But time is not associated with the same light. It's never the same light and time does not re-emit between packets. Time is not relative. Do NOT allow your mind Carte Blanche to think along the lines of relative time. DROP IT for this thought experiment. We are thinking along the lines of ABSOLUTE TIME/ Galilean VARIANCE. What does absolute time mean? It means time is constant in ALL frames of reference. Any frequency shifts between atomic clocks IS a literal change in the speed of light. But relativity forbids the speed of light from Ever changing, so relativity (Lorentz INVARIANCE) invented the concept of the 4th dimension and space-time. Because Relativity doesn't allow light speed to shift.. they interpret the same frequency shift between atomic clocks as being conclusive, irrefutable evidence that time and reality itself shifts. Rather than say it's just that ONE clock being affected by Earth's gravity and the oscillation of that ONE cesium clock is being altered compared to other clocks. People don't realize that in relativity... time dilation is SYMMETRICAL! Not even most relativists know their own theory. If Clock A and Clock B are synchronized and together... and then they accelerate apart... Einstein said Clock A would see Clock B as being slower itself. And Clock B would view Clock A as slower than ITself. NOT that only one observer would see back in time and the other would see forward or not at all. No... BOTH observers are supposed to see each other BACK in time relative to each other according to Einstein and the consequence of the math. It doesn't make ANY sense!! But relativists toss that part of time dilation under their 4th dimensional rug. The rug is woven from threads of gold that only the smart people can see apparently. So... here's a thought experiment/ Gedankenexperiment for absolute time. NO paradoxes... no nonsense or confusion. What do you see in a club? You see disco lights changing and a color wheel effect. You see everyone in REAL-TIME. Not just because they are so close to the lights. Light is not a recording of reality. Light is simply color. Illuminating reality in a certain color. Just because you can't see something yet or the color hasn't reached you doesn't mean it isn't happening in real-time. Zoom out and look at the people in the club through binoculars a mile away. You are still looking at them in real-time. The colors are shifting with a delay in the club. Now look at the club through a telescope from the surface of the moon. You're still looking at the people in real-time. But now there is a lag of the colors shifting by 1.25 seconds because it takes light 1.25 seconds to travel from the Earth to the moon. Now look at the club through an even bigger telescope from the surface of Mars. You're still looking at the people in real-time, but now there is a lag of the colors shifting by 3 minutes because it takes light 3 minutes to travel from Earth to Mars. fr you are a third hypothetical observer zoomed out and watching the person from Mars AND seeing the club on Earth... you're still seeing everything happening in real-time as well. But you see the colored wavepackets traveling with a delay to the observer on Mars. And the disco color wheel effect is just lagging before it affects the observer from Mars and the observer on the Moon. It doesn't matter how far you zoom out! There is only now to observe. But there WILL be a lag and delay for a given color/wavepacket to reach distant observers. But all points in space are already illuminated by other starlight. So if you're too far away... you'll just see the club in real-time but without any disco lights. Just see them in white light because that's the source already illuminating the scene. This is where it gets the most difficult because people think light itself is a recording of reality that replays a scene from where it came from. But another punch in the gut of relativity is that in order to see REFLECTED light... that would require a TWO-WAY transit. Which means the light would have to be sent out... record the scene of a distant event and then RETURN in order to REplay the event. Which means it would take 6 minutes to see the club from Mars by that logic and 2.5 seconds to see the club from the moon by that logic. The difference in tick rates between clocks has NOTHING to do with time dilation. Wait.. what?! How can that be? Because a clock itself doesn't represent all of time and reality. The difference between clocks is a "Transverse relative time shift." If the only light in the universe was from the lighter… the only way a distant observer would be able to see the astronaut on Mars is if the astronaut held down the button of the lighter for longer than 3 minutes. It takes 3 minutes for the packet of light to travel from Mars to Earth. The distant observer would never be able to see Mars, unless the light stretched from Mars all the way to Earth, and illuminated the path between Mars and Earth. And that would take 3 minutes for the boundary and first part of that wave packet to reach Earth. But if the distant observer wanted to observe Mars in real-time… then that packet of light would have to be on for longer than 3 minutes. So if the astronaut on Mars flicked the lighter at 12:00, the distant observer on Earth wouldn't see anything until 12:03. If the light was on for 3 minutes and 10 seconds, and the distant observer is 3 light minutes away... the distant observer would be able to see Mars in real-time for 10 seconds starting at 12:03. In the 20 second video clip of the rotating planet with shifting colors... just imagine you're a couple light minutes or light seconds away. You're still seeing the planet spin in real-time. But there is simply a delay of switching colors. You are Not looking back in time. It's just a color wheel effect from a great distance away. That's it!! There are many major flaws which tarnish people's critical thinking on this thought experiment. 1. Light does NOT ricochet or bounce. Electrons absorb, emit and re-emit ALL electromagnetic radiation. The electrons, making up the glass of a mirror will absorb the incoming light and re-emit a brand-new light as an equal and opposite reaction. NOT that "the same light" bounced off the mirror and continued on within the same frame of reference.  2. Light is NOT a recording of reality. 3. It is NOT the same light being observed from a source. It's never the same light. Each Hertz is a new light. Think of half of a sine wave as being its own emission. On an oscilloscope, a stimulus generates a peak which initiates an equal and opposite trough. Or vice versa. That repeating process is not "the same light." If you cut and paste that sine wave to another sine wave, the boundary between the waves will always be in phase. (thus refraction) 4. The speed of light is NOT the same in ALL frames of reference, no matter what. 5. Light is NOT made of particles and waves that flip back-and-forth. 6. Time is NOT connected to the speed of light. Time remains constant regardless if you accelerate towards or away from a clock. The clocks themselves will indeed be off! But that's an affect on the electrons making up the atomic clock affecting the oscillation of the isotope which is ASSUMED to ALWAYS be the same. So ANY difference in oscillation is treated as a literal distortion in space-time. 7. Space and time are not linked at all. That is a mathematical artifice under Lorentz invariance. Time is relative under Lorentz invariance. But time is absolute under Galilean VARIANCE. When people hear or see the word GALILEAN... their brains switch to auto pilot to "aether theory" and "classical physics." What people don't realize is that aether theory used Galilean INVARIANCE. Rather than space-time being used as an excuse to explain the difference in frequencies between atomic clocks... it was originally aether being used as an excuse to keep the speed of light the same. But None of those things are valid! We are thinking under the framework of Galilean VARIANCE! Completely new revolutionary model returning to Isaac Newton and Classical physics but without the corpuscular theory (particle) theory for light... without a particle-wave duality... without an aether... without a 4th dimension. Just good ol elementary math within 3D Euclidean space. Everything happening in real-time, right now. This reformulation of Galilean transformations was offered by Dr. Edward Dowdye in 1991 called The Extinction Shift Principle. Effectivity as opposed to Relativity. If light required a two-way transit, in order to travel out… Record an event, and travel back to replay the recording…  then it would take 6 minutes to see the astronaut on Mars instead of 3.  Remember… They say the SAME light is a recording, and must travel there and travel back in order to REplay. Relativity says time is relative: t' ≠ t time is NOT the same from all frames of reference) and t = tₒ / √1 - v²/c² but Galilean Variance says time is not relative: t' = t (Time IS the same from all frames of reference) and τ_tr = τₒ / √1 - v²/c² Relativity says c' = c (The velocity of light is the same from all frames of reference) but Galilean variance says c' ≠ c (The velocity of light is NOT the same from all frames of reference) and that c' = c ± v (The velocity of light in one frame of reference is dependent upon the velocity of the light source relative to an observer in another frame of reference. Whether that light source is approaching or receding away from that observer) Relativity says E = mc² (Energy and mass are universally equivalent and literally interchangeable under All conditions.) but Galilean variance says E = Δmc² = mₒc² (Energy changes in a system are the result from changes in mass. mₒ represents the original mass. Mass and energy do not literally interchange. There is an equivalence, not an interchange.) The Rebirth of Classical Physics: Time, Light & Gravity Star light and illumination: Flicking a Lighter on Mars visual example:
0:21

Thought experiment for people regarding the concept of Absolute Time. Absolute means NO EXCEPTIONS. We are NOT looking back in time when we see galaxies and stars. We are NOT looking back in time 1.25 seconds when we see the moon. We're Not looking back in time 3 minutes when we see Mars. We're Not looking back in time 8.33 minutes when we see the Sun. If an astronaut lit a matchstick on Mars, the distant observer would see predator heat waves at the top of the matchstick in real-time while the matchstick started to blacken towards the astronaut's fingers. But there would be no orange light from that chemical reaction or flame seen. If the matchstick burnt out before the packet of orange light from that particular chemical reaction made it to Earth… then the distant observer would just see a disembodied orange flash of light with a lag. But the Earth-bound observer would never actually see the flame associated with the orange wavelength it put out. The wavelength of color emitted by the flame is not a recording of reality. If the orange light is 650 Thz, that means there are 650 trillion individual and separate bursts of orange light pulsating in 1 second. NOT that "the same light" is "waving" 650 trillion times a second and that light is a recording of reality. There are 650 trillion brand-new lights flashing in 1 second. Each Hertz is a brand-new emission and packet unto itself. Time does not re-emit 650 trillion times a second, nor is a photon a particle or a packet of reality acting like the frame of a reel of footage. The orange light that already left the flame will continue to propagate out until it meets the electrons making up the distant observer. But remember, it is never the same light within that packet. And the electrons making up the observer will absorb all of those different lights within that packet and re-emit brand-new lights that produce the product of illumination. A photon is a massless packet of energy, spherically expanding at the rate of c from the source it comes from. Illumination is the result of that energy being absorbed and RE-emitted by any other electrons that did not output that primary packet. But time is not associated with the same light. It's never the same light and time does not re-emit between packets. Time is not relative. Do NOT allow your mind Carte Blanche to think along the lines of relative time. DROP IT for this thought experiment. We are thinking along the lines of ABSOLUTE TIME/ Galilean VARIANCE. What does absolute time mean? It means time is constant in ALL frames of reference. Any frequency shifts between atomic clocks IS a literal change in the speed of light. But relativity forbids the speed of light from Ever changing, so relativity (Lorentz INVARIANCE) invented the concept of the 4th dimension and space-time. Because Relativity doesn't allow light speed to shift.. they interpret the same frequency shift between atomic clocks as being conclusive, irrefutable evidence that time and reality itself shifts. Rather than say it's just that ONE clock being affected by Earth's gravity and the oscillation of that ONE cesium clock is being altered compared to other clocks. People don't realize that in relativity... time dilation is SYMMETRICAL! Not even most relativists know their own theory. If Clock A and Clock B are synchronized and together... and then they accelerate apart... Einstein said Clock A would see Clock B as being slower itself. And Clock B would view Clock A as slower than ITself. NOT that only one observer would see back in time and the other would see forward or not at all. No... BOTH observers are supposed to see each other BACK in time relative to each other according to Einstein and the consequence of the math. It doesn't make ANY sense!! But relativists toss that part of time dilation under their 4th dimensional rug. The rug is woven from threads of gold that only the smart people can see apparently. So... here's a thought experiment/ Gedankenexperiment for absolute time. NO paradoxes... no nonsense or confusion. What do you see in a club? You see disco lights changing and a color wheel effect. You see everyone in REAL-TIME. Not just because they are so close to the lights. Light is not a recording of reality. Light is simply color. Illuminating reality in a certain color. Just because you can't see something yet or the color hasn't reached you doesn't mean it isn't happening in real-time. Zoom out and look at the people in the club through binoculars a mile away. You are still looking at them in real-time. The colors are shifting with a delay in the club. Now look at the club through a telescope from the surface of the moon. You're still looking at the people in real-time. But now there is a lag of the colors shifting by 1.25 seconds because it takes light 1.25 seconds to travel from the Earth to the moon. Now look at the club through an even bigger telescope from the surface of Mars. You're still looking at the people in real-time, but now there is a lag of the colors shifting by 3 minutes because it takes light 3 minutes to travel from Earth to Mars. fr you are a third hypothetical observer zoomed out and watching the person from Mars AND seeing the club on Earth... you're still seeing everything happening in real-time as well. But you see the colored wavepackets traveling with a delay to the observer on Mars. And the disco color wheel effect is just lagging before it affects the observer from Mars and the observer on the Moon. It doesn't matter how far you zoom out! There is only now to observe. But there WILL be a lag and delay for a given color/wavepacket to reach distant observers. But all points in space are already illuminated by other starlight. So if you're too far away... you'll just see the club in real-time but without any disco lights. Just see them in white light because that's the source already illuminating the scene. This is where it gets the most difficult because people think light itself is a recording of reality that replays a scene from where it came from. But another punch in the gut of relativity is that in order to see REFLECTED light... that would require a TWO-WAY transit. Which means the light would have to be sent out... record the scene of a distant event and then RETURN in order to REplay the event. Which means it would take 6 minutes to see the club from Mars by that logic and 2.5 seconds to see the club from the moon by that logic. The difference in tick rates between clocks has NOTHING to do with time dilation. Wait.. what?! How can that be? Because a clock itself doesn't represent all of time and reality. The difference between clocks is a "Transverse relative time shift." If the only light in the universe was from the lighter… the only way a distant observer would be able to see the astronaut on Mars is if the astronaut held down the button of the lighter for longer than 3 minutes. It takes 3 minutes for the packet of light to travel from Mars to Earth. The distant observer would never be able to see Mars, unless the light stretched from Mars all the way to Earth, and illuminated the path between Mars and Earth. And that would take 3 minutes for the boundary and first part of that wave packet to reach Earth. But if the distant observer wanted to observe Mars in real-time… then that packet of light would have to be on for longer than 3 minutes. So if the astronaut on Mars flicked the lighter at 12:00, the distant observer on Earth wouldn't see anything until 12:03. If the light was on for 3 minutes and 10 seconds, and the distant observer is 3 light minutes away... the distant observer would be able to see Mars in real-time for 10 seconds starting at 12:03. In the 20 second video clip of the rotating planet with shifting colors... just imagine you're a couple light minutes or light seconds away. You're still seeing the planet spin in real-time. But there is simply a delay of switching colors. You are Not looking back in time. It's just a color wheel effect from a great distance away. That's it!! There are many major flaws which tarnish people's critical thinking on this thought experiment. 1. Light does NOT ricochet or bounce. Electrons absorb, emit and re-emit ALL electromagnetic radiation. The electrons, making up the glass of a mirror will absorb the incoming light and re-emit a brand-new light as an equal and opposite reaction. NOT that "the same light" bounced off the mirror and continued on within the same frame of reference.  2. Light is NOT a recording of reality. 3. It is NOT the same light being observed from a source. It's never the same light. Each Hertz is a new light. Think of half of a sine wave as being its own emission. On an oscilloscope, a stimulus generates a peak which initiates an equal and opposite trough. Or vice versa. That repeating process is not "the same light." If you cut and paste that sine wave to another sine wave, the boundary between the waves will always be in phase. (thus refraction) 4. The speed of light is NOT the same in ALL frames of reference, no matter what. 5. Light is NOT made of particles and waves that flip back-and-forth. 6. Time is NOT connected to the speed of light. Time remains constant regardless if you accelerate towards or away from a clock. The clocks themselves will indeed be off! But that's an affect on the electrons making up the atomic clock affecting the oscillation of the isotope which is ASSUMED to ALWAYS be the same. So ANY difference in oscillation is treated as a literal distortion in space-time. 7. Space and time are not linked at all. That is a mathematical artifice under Lorentz invariance. Time is relative under Lorentz invariance. But time is absolute under Galilean VARIANCE. When people hear or see the word GALILEAN... their brains switch to auto pilot to "aether theory" and "classical physics." What people don't realize is that aether theory used Galilean INVARIANCE. Rather than space-time being used as an excuse to explain the difference in frequencies between atomic clocks... it was originally aether being used as an excuse to keep the speed of light the same. But None of those things are valid! We are thinking under the framework of Galilean VARIANCE! Completely new revolutionary model returning to Isaac Newton and Classical physics but without the corpuscular theory (particle) theory for light... without a particle-wave duality... without an aether... without a 4th dimension. Just good ol elementary math within 3D Euclidean space. Everything happening in real-time, right now. This reformulation of Galilean transformations was offered by Dr. Edward Dowdye in 1991 called The Extinction Shift Principle. Effectivity as opposed to Relativity. If light required a two-way transit, in order to travel out… Record an event, and travel back to replay the recording…  then it would take 6 minutes to see the astronaut on Mars instead of 3.  Remember… They say the SAME light is a recording, and must travel there and travel back in order to REplay. Relativity says time is relative: t' ≠ t time is NOT the same from all frames of reference) and t = tₒ / √1 - v²/c² but Galilean Variance says time is not relative: t' = t (Time IS the same from all frames of reference) and τ_tr = τₒ / √1 - v²/c² Relativity says c' = c (The velocity of light is the same from all frames of reference) but Galilean variance says c' ≠ c (The velocity of light is NOT the same from all frames of reference) and that c' = c ± v (The velocity of light in one frame of reference is dependent upon the velocity of the light source relative to an observer in another frame of reference. Whether that light source is approaching or receding away from that observer) Relativity says E = mc² (Energy and mass are universally equivalent and literally interchangeable under All conditions.) but Galilean variance says E = Δmc² = mₒc² (Energy changes in a system are the result from changes in mass. mₒ represents the original mass. Mass and energy do not literally interchange. There is an equivalence, not an interchange.) The Rebirth of Classical Physics: Time, Light & Gravity Star light and illumination: Flicking a Lighter on Mars visual example:

TheRealVerbz (Jason Verbelli)

16,608 次观看 • 1 年前

The first false claim about Israel that I address in my forthcoming book, Israel on Trial: Examining the History, the Evidence, and the Law, is that Jews are colonizers in the land of Israel. What's the legal principle here? A man cannot trespass into his own home. So, whose home is it? The book in chapter one deals with the colonialist claim by outlining three different kinds of evidence outside of the Bible. Why three different kinds of evidence? Because in the courtroom we tell the jurors that one kind of evidence is good, two kind of evidence is great, three kinds of evidence—if they're independent and they didn't know each other and their incentive structure is such that they're not incentivized to create a story, and they intersect and corroborate one another—that means a great deal. So, what are the three pieces of evidence that we know can have no perverse incentive in this case? 1. Rocks in the ground, archeology from thousands of years ago. 2. Words on the page, documentary proof from hundreds or thousands of years ago. 3. And blood in the veins, DNA evidence that cannot be misconstrued. Let's go through a couple examples: 1. Josephus, the ancient historian of the first century, Jewish general turned priest turned Roman historian for the Emperor Vespasian, he writes, just like the Bible does, that in the temple in Jerusalem, there was a place with a stone that directed the priests where to walk on top of the parapet in order to trumpet to the citizenry in Jerusalem that the Sabbath/Shabbat was here, every Friday night, and that the Sabbath/Shabbat had closed every Saturday evening. And he tells us what it said in Hebrew: "To the place of trumpeting." And that there was no arrow, okay, the priests weren't stupid, but that was what it said in the stone. 2. Can we corroborate what Josephus wrote? Folks, the Israel Antiquities Authorities has recovered not one, but two such stones. You can see them for yourselves on the internet. They're amazing, because the stone itself is blemished, but the actual Hebrew writing is not only intact, but so crisp and clear and unambiguous that even my children, who are Jewish Day School, can read it today, 2,000 years later. And in Hebrew letters, those rocks on the ground, corroborating the words on the page say, "To the place of trumpeting." By the way, again, when we scrutinize incentives, these stones were written and they were placed thousands of years ago, long before there was ever such a thing as a Palestinian, long before there was ever such a thing as Muslim Arabs. Islam, remember, wasn't created until 610 AD. Muhammad himself isn't born until 570 AD. That means he is born exactly 500 years, to the letter, after the temple on which this stone was placed was destroyed. When a story, we tell jurors in the law all the time, when a story was created long before the dispute in question arose, we give it special credibility. You didn't know there was gonna be a lawsuit 10 years from now, so what you said 10 years ago matters a great deal. . We just had a well-known, I guess you could call him a commentator on TV, Tucker Carlson, interview the U.S. Ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, about this claim that Jews should have to have DNA tests before they can live in Israel. Even on its own terms, this claim fails, because the fact of the matter is that dozens of genetic studies have been conducted on the major Jewish populations around the world, the Syrian Jews, the Iraqi and Iranian Jews, the Ashkenazi Jews of Europe, etc... And these studies have all confirmed that not only are all of the major Jewish populations in the world are connected to one another, but that all our DNA also comes from one place 2,000 years ago, and that place is the Levant, the Middle East, where Israel is today. These tests show that of all the major Jewish populations in the world, the Iranian-Iraqi branch, the Persian branch, so to speak, is the furthest removed genetically from all the rest of us. Which is to say that I, being an Ashkenazi Jew, am closer in my DNA to a Syrian Jew, a Moroccan Jew, and an Italian Jew, than a Syrian or Moroccan Jew is to an Iraqi or Iranian Jew. Why does that matter? Remember your Bible. Remember what the rocks in the ground show. In 586 B.C., the Babylonians, Nebuchadnezzar II conquer most of the Middle East, including the land of Israel and the Jews, and they push the Jews into exile in Babylon, where we lived for less than 50 years. Because in 539 B.C., Cyrus II, the emperor of the Achaemenid or Persian Empire, he defeats the descendants of Nebuchadnezzar in battle, a hapless guy named Nabonidus, and he takes most of their possessions, including the land of Israel. But he has a different view of all of this, reflected on the Cyrus Cylinder, which you may have heard of, very famous archeological object, which corroborates what the Book of Ezra says, that he sent all of the people he had conquered back to their homelands to rebuild their temples and to reinstitute their sacred cults. That's what he did with the Jews. That's what the Book of Ezra tells us. And by the tens of thousands, the Jews went back to Jerusalem and rebuilt the temple, what we call the Second Temple, which is the same temple where 600 years later, the Romans would destroy it and the Parapet Stone would fall, which said, "To the place of trumpeting." All of it is connected. And so why is that important when it comes to testing the DNA? Because remember what I told you, the DNA shows that those Jews from Iran and Iraq are the furthest removed. Why? Because the Bible tells us and the archeological record tells us, and in fact, the Talmud tells us, there are two Talmuds, one from Israel, one from Babylon, that some percentage of the Jews, some say as many as half or more, said, "Oh, we're doing pretty well here in Cyrus' Persia. We're not going back." And they stayed. They wrote the Babylonian Talmud. They built vibrant Jewish communities in Iran and Iraq, many of which stayed undisturbed until the 1960s when most Jews were pushed out of the Middle East and fled to Israel. On the other hand, the Jews that left and rebuilt the Second Temple, they spread all throughout the world after the destruction of the Second Temple by the Romans in 70 AD. They formed the Jewish communities we know today in America, South America, Europe. So all those Jewish communities are closely tied with one another because they're descended from the Jews that went back. And what do the DNA tests show? Not just that all the other major Jewish populations of the world are more closely linked than they are to the Iranian-Iraqi Jews, but that the time where the DNA split between all the other Jewish populations of the world and the Persian-Jewish population was between 100-150 generations ago. If you factor in the average age that people lived to over the course of the last 100-150 generations, it's 2,500 years. That means that the split happened 2,500 years ago, corroborating exactly, with blood in the veins, the story from the Bible and the rocks in the ground, that 2,500 years ago, in the 500s B.C., Cyrus sent some of the Jews back to reconstruct their temple in Jerusalem, whereas some of them stayed behind. This is how we use evidence, logic, and law to deconstruct a false claim about Israel.
17:27

The first false claim about Israel that I address in my forthcoming book, Israel on Trial: Examining the History, the Evidence, and the Law, is that Jews are colonizers in the land of Israel. What's the legal principle here? A man cannot trespass into his own home. So, whose home is it? The book in chapter one deals with the colonialist claim by outlining three different kinds of evidence outside of the Bible. Why three different kinds of evidence? Because in the courtroom we tell the jurors that one kind of evidence is good, two kind of evidence is great, three kinds of evidence—if they're independent and they didn't know each other and their incentive structure is such that they're not incentivized to create a story, and they intersect and corroborate one another—that means a great deal. So, what are the three pieces of evidence that we know can have no perverse incentive in this case? 1. Rocks in the ground, archeology from thousands of years ago. 2. Words on the page, documentary proof from hundreds or thousands of years ago. 3. And blood in the veins, DNA evidence that cannot be misconstrued. Let's go through a couple examples: 1. Josephus, the ancient historian of the first century, Jewish general turned priest turned Roman historian for the Emperor Vespasian, he writes, just like the Bible does, that in the temple in Jerusalem, there was a place with a stone that directed the priests where to walk on top of the parapet in order to trumpet to the citizenry in Jerusalem that the Sabbath/Shabbat was here, every Friday night, and that the Sabbath/Shabbat had closed every Saturday evening. And he tells us what it said in Hebrew: "To the place of trumpeting." And that there was no arrow, okay, the priests weren't stupid, but that was what it said in the stone. 2. Can we corroborate what Josephus wrote? Folks, the Israel Antiquities Authorities has recovered not one, but two such stones. You can see them for yourselves on the internet. They're amazing, because the stone itself is blemished, but the actual Hebrew writing is not only intact, but so crisp and clear and unambiguous that even my children, who are Jewish Day School, can read it today, 2,000 years later. And in Hebrew letters, those rocks on the ground, corroborating the words on the page say, "To the place of trumpeting." By the way, again, when we scrutinize incentives, these stones were written and they were placed thousands of years ago, long before there was ever such a thing as a Palestinian, long before there was ever such a thing as Muslim Arabs. Islam, remember, wasn't created until 610 AD. Muhammad himself isn't born until 570 AD. That means he is born exactly 500 years, to the letter, after the temple on which this stone was placed was destroyed. When a story, we tell jurors in the law all the time, when a story was created long before the dispute in question arose, we give it special credibility. You didn't know there was gonna be a lawsuit 10 years from now, so what you said 10 years ago matters a great deal. . We just had a well-known, I guess you could call him a commentator on TV, Tucker Carlson, interview the U.S. Ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, about this claim that Jews should have to have DNA tests before they can live in Israel. Even on its own terms, this claim fails, because the fact of the matter is that dozens of genetic studies have been conducted on the major Jewish populations around the world, the Syrian Jews, the Iraqi and Iranian Jews, the Ashkenazi Jews of Europe, etc... And these studies have all confirmed that not only are all of the major Jewish populations in the world are connected to one another, but that all our DNA also comes from one place 2,000 years ago, and that place is the Levant, the Middle East, where Israel is today. These tests show that of all the major Jewish populations in the world, the Iranian-Iraqi branch, the Persian branch, so to speak, is the furthest removed genetically from all the rest of us. Which is to say that I, being an Ashkenazi Jew, am closer in my DNA to a Syrian Jew, a Moroccan Jew, and an Italian Jew, than a Syrian or Moroccan Jew is to an Iraqi or Iranian Jew. Why does that matter? Remember your Bible. Remember what the rocks in the ground show. In 586 B.C., the Babylonians, Nebuchadnezzar II conquer most of the Middle East, including the land of Israel and the Jews, and they push the Jews into exile in Babylon, where we lived for less than 50 years. Because in 539 B.C., Cyrus II, the emperor of the Achaemenid or Persian Empire, he defeats the descendants of Nebuchadnezzar in battle, a hapless guy named Nabonidus, and he takes most of their possessions, including the land of Israel. But he has a different view of all of this, reflected on the Cyrus Cylinder, which you may have heard of, very famous archeological object, which corroborates what the Book of Ezra says, that he sent all of the people he had conquered back to their homelands to rebuild their temples and to reinstitute their sacred cults. That's what he did with the Jews. That's what the Book of Ezra tells us. And by the tens of thousands, the Jews went back to Jerusalem and rebuilt the temple, what we call the Second Temple, which is the same temple where 600 years later, the Romans would destroy it and the Parapet Stone would fall, which said, "To the place of trumpeting." All of it is connected. And so why is that important when it comes to testing the DNA? Because remember what I told you, the DNA shows that those Jews from Iran and Iraq are the furthest removed. Why? Because the Bible tells us and the archeological record tells us, and in fact, the Talmud tells us, there are two Talmuds, one from Israel, one from Babylon, that some percentage of the Jews, some say as many as half or more, said, "Oh, we're doing pretty well here in Cyrus' Persia. We're not going back." And they stayed. They wrote the Babylonian Talmud. They built vibrant Jewish communities in Iran and Iraq, many of which stayed undisturbed until the 1960s when most Jews were pushed out of the Middle East and fled to Israel. On the other hand, the Jews that left and rebuilt the Second Temple, they spread all throughout the world after the destruction of the Second Temple by the Romans in 70 AD. They formed the Jewish communities we know today in America, South America, Europe. So all those Jewish communities are closely tied with one another because they're descended from the Jews that went back. And what do the DNA tests show? Not just that all the other major Jewish populations of the world are more closely linked than they are to the Iranian-Iraqi Jews, but that the time where the DNA split between all the other Jewish populations of the world and the Persian-Jewish population was between 100-150 generations ago. If you factor in the average age that people lived to over the course of the last 100-150 generations, it's 2,500 years. That means that the split happened 2,500 years ago, corroborating exactly, with blood in the veins, the story from the Bible and the rocks in the ground, that 2,500 years ago, in the 500s B.C., Cyrus sent some of the Jews back to reconstruct their temple in Jerusalem, whereas some of them stayed behind. This is how we use evidence, logic, and law to deconstruct a false claim about Israel.

Roy K. Altman

29,926 次观看 • 3 个月前

"The point of Brian Tully leaking Lindsey Gaetani's phone was to create a media frenzy and change the narrative. To get everyone to stop looking at other key figures in the Karen Read + TurtleBoy cases. Specifically, friends of Tully's MSP unit like Jen McCabe and PI Kate Peter." "By throwing Gaetani's entire private life out there, they could seize control of the public narrative at a really critical moment (April 2024, the start of the first Karen Read and John O'Keefe trial) and create one heck of a diversion." "You know, this story is so much bigger than just a data leak. It's really about the alleged weaponization of evidence, and it leaves us with a really unsettling question. What happens to justice when evidence isn't being used to find the truth, but is instead being used as a weapon to control a story?" TRANSCRIPT: Alright, let's talk about the Karen Read case. There's this wild story that's been bubbling up and it's not even about the trial itself, it's about the evidence. We're going to dive into a massive data leak that raises some pretty serious questions about how law enforcement is operating here. I mean, just think about this for a second. How on earth does a decade and a half of someone's private phone data—we're talking texts, photos, contacts, everything—end up out in the open, and get this: released by the very people who are supposed to be protecting it? So this all blew up in April of 2024. The complete, totally unredacted phone data of a key person in this whole affair, Lindsey Gaetani, was just leaked. And I'm not just talking about a couple of messages; we're talking about her entire digital life laid bare for everyone to see. 15 years—just let that sink in. Imagine everything on your phone going all the way back to the mid-2000s, just suddenly becoming public information. It's a huge breach of privacy, and it makes you ask one thing right away: How could this possibly happen? Okay, so to figure out how this went down, we really have to look at the people involved. And trust me, it is a complicated web of state troopers, private investigators, and even online operatives, all connected in some really crucial ways. Let's try to untangle this a bit. You've got state police officer Brian Tully, he's the one who allegedly leaked the data, and there's Kate Peter, a private investigator. And what's really weird is that her messages with Gaetani were mysteriously scrubbed from the data before it got out. Trooper Nick Guarino is the one who processed the data. And all of this, this whole handover, happened while the special prosecutor, Ken Mello, was literally in the hospital. The theory is that this was all meant to protect people like Jen McCabe, who's a key witness in the main case. So how did this happen? Well, one story being floated is that it was just a series of clumsy accidents, a real comedy of errors that, whoops, resulted in a massive data breach. As you can probably guess, not a lot of people are buying that one. So the accident theory—and you gotta' hear this—goes something like this. An officer tripped? Okay, and while he was stumbling, he just happened to perfectly edit a cell phone extraction, removing very specific messages. Then, apparently he morphed into a snowball, rolled down the highway, and tumbled right into the defense lawyer's office, delivering the data. You know, a total accident. Yeah, as one source put it, it's just ludicrous. You don't trip and fall and end up in that situation. It makes no sense. So if it wasn't some bizarre accident, what was it? Well, there's a much more compelling argument out there, that this leak was no accident. It was a deliberate, calculated move. And there's actually evidence that points right in that direction. Just consider these points for a minute. A clumsy trip doesn't explain why specific messages from Trooper Tully himself and from PI Kate Peter were surgically removed from the data. It also doesn't explain the timing. Why would Tully hand deliver this package, personally, while the one guy who could provide any oversight, Prosecutor Ken Mello, was out of commission in the hospital? And this isn't just speculation. This is special prosecutor Ken Mello testifying in court. He confirms it. He says that while he was hospitalized, his colleague, Tully, delivered the evidence package. This tells us that someone took it upon themselves to act, while their superior was unavailable. So let's just lay it all out, side by side. In one corner you have the accident theory, which, you know, involves snowballs and doesn't explain any of the key facts, like the edited data. And in the other corner you have the intentional leak theory. This one actually explains the missing messages and is backed up by court testimony and some seriously suspicious timing. So that brings us to the biggest question of all, right? If this was a deliberate act by a member of law enforcement, what was the motive? Why on earth would an officer intentionally leak 15 years of someone's private life? Well, according to the sources we're looking at, the answer is just one word: Distraction. The whole point of this massive data dump was to create a media frenzy, a public circus, and completely change the conversation. And what was the goal of this distraction? It was allegedly to get everyone to stop looking at other key figures in the case. Specifically, people who were friends of the police unit, like Jen McCabe and PI Kate Peter. By throwing Gaetani's entire private life out there, they could seize control of the public narrative at a really critical moment and create one heck of a diversion. You know, this story is so much bigger than just a data leak. It's really about the alleged weaponization of evidence, and it leaves us with a really unsettling question. What happens to justice when evidence isn't being used to find the truth, but is instead being used as a weapon to control a story?
4:59

"The point of Brian Tully leaking Lindsey Gaetani's phone was to create a media frenzy and change the narrative. To get everyone to stop looking at other key figures in the Karen Read + TurtleBoy cases. Specifically, friends of Tully's MSP unit like Jen McCabe and PI Kate Peter." "By throwing Gaetani's entire private life out there, they could seize control of the public narrative at a really critical moment (April 2024, the start of the first Karen Read and John O'Keefe trial) and create one heck of a diversion." "You know, this story is so much bigger than just a data leak. It's really about the alleged weaponization of evidence, and it leaves us with a really unsettling question. What happens to justice when evidence isn't being used to find the truth, but is instead being used as a weapon to control a story?" TRANSCRIPT: Alright, let's talk about the Karen Read case. There's this wild story that's been bubbling up and it's not even about the trial itself, it's about the evidence. We're going to dive into a massive data leak that raises some pretty serious questions about how law enforcement is operating here. I mean, just think about this for a second. How on earth does a decade and a half of someone's private phone data—we're talking texts, photos, contacts, everything—end up out in the open, and get this: released by the very people who are supposed to be protecting it? So this all blew up in April of 2024. The complete, totally unredacted phone data of a key person in this whole affair, Lindsey Gaetani, was just leaked. And I'm not just talking about a couple of messages; we're talking about her entire digital life laid bare for everyone to see. 15 years—just let that sink in. Imagine everything on your phone going all the way back to the mid-2000s, just suddenly becoming public information. It's a huge breach of privacy, and it makes you ask one thing right away: How could this possibly happen? Okay, so to figure out how this went down, we really have to look at the people involved. And trust me, it is a complicated web of state troopers, private investigators, and even online operatives, all connected in some really crucial ways. Let's try to untangle this a bit. You've got state police officer Brian Tully, he's the one who allegedly leaked the data, and there's Kate Peter, a private investigator. And what's really weird is that her messages with Gaetani were mysteriously scrubbed from the data before it got out. Trooper Nick Guarino is the one who processed the data. And all of this, this whole handover, happened while the special prosecutor, Ken Mello, was literally in the hospital. The theory is that this was all meant to protect people like Jen McCabe, who's a key witness in the main case. So how did this happen? Well, one story being floated is that it was just a series of clumsy accidents, a real comedy of errors that, whoops, resulted in a massive data breach. As you can probably guess, not a lot of people are buying that one. So the accident theory—and you gotta' hear this—goes something like this. An officer tripped? Okay, and while he was stumbling, he just happened to perfectly edit a cell phone extraction, removing very specific messages. Then, apparently he morphed into a snowball, rolled down the highway, and tumbled right into the defense lawyer's office, delivering the data. You know, a total accident. Yeah, as one source put it, it's just ludicrous. You don't trip and fall and end up in that situation. It makes no sense. So if it wasn't some bizarre accident, what was it? Well, there's a much more compelling argument out there, that this leak was no accident. It was a deliberate, calculated move. And there's actually evidence that points right in that direction. Just consider these points for a minute. A clumsy trip doesn't explain why specific messages from Trooper Tully himself and from PI Kate Peter were surgically removed from the data. It also doesn't explain the timing. Why would Tully hand deliver this package, personally, while the one guy who could provide any oversight, Prosecutor Ken Mello, was out of commission in the hospital? And this isn't just speculation. This is special prosecutor Ken Mello testifying in court. He confirms it. He says that while he was hospitalized, his colleague, Tully, delivered the evidence package. This tells us that someone took it upon themselves to act, while their superior was unavailable. So let's just lay it all out, side by side. In one corner you have the accident theory, which, you know, involves snowballs and doesn't explain any of the key facts, like the edited data. And in the other corner you have the intentional leak theory. This one actually explains the missing messages and is backed up by court testimony and some seriously suspicious timing. So that brings us to the biggest question of all, right? If this was a deliberate act by a member of law enforcement, what was the motive? Why on earth would an officer intentionally leak 15 years of someone's private life? Well, according to the sources we're looking at, the answer is just one word: Distraction. The whole point of this massive data dump was to create a media frenzy, a public circus, and completely change the conversation. And what was the goal of this distraction? It was allegedly to get everyone to stop looking at other key figures in the case. Specifically, people who were friends of the police unit, like Jen McCabe and PI Kate Peter. By throwing Gaetani's entire private life out there, they could seize control of the public narrative at a really critical moment and create one heck of a diversion. You know, this story is so much bigger than just a data leak. It's really about the alleged weaponization of evidence, and it leaves us with a really unsettling question. What happens to justice when evidence isn't being used to find the truth, but is instead being used as a weapon to control a story?

Grant Smith Ellis

12,028 次观看 • 9 个月前

🚨 Atlantis, the Moon, and Periodic Cataclysms 🚨 | Is humanity on the brink of remembering a forgotten past? In this wildly speculative and captivating episode, Randall Carlson – a freemason, geologist, and perennial mystery hunter – dives into ancient civilizations, lost science, and the mind-bending idea that the Moon may have been a geoengineered haven for survivors of an ancient cataclysm. Carlson makes a startling case for a lost golden age, shattered by cosmic impact, and argues that our future hinges on remembering this hidden legacy. He also challenges mainstream narratives around the Shroud of Turin, arguing that the carbon dating was flawed—and that the man imprinted on the cloth was alive when it was created, upending centuries of skepticism. Key Revelations: The Atlantis Hypothesis and Sunken Continents: - Carlson locates Atlantis on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, now submerged beneath the ocean. - Submerged shorelines, ocean core samples, and isostatic rebound data support the idea that large landmasses sank post-Ice Age. - The Azores are the mountaintops of a once-thriving Atlantic civilization, strategically located between Africa, Europe, and the Americas. The Moon: A Possible Artificial Construct: - Carlson points to bizarre lunar anomalies: perfect size-distance ratios from the sun, synchronous rotation, and hollowness (outer layers seem less dense than inner layers, which pattern matches to hollow structures and excavation sites). Presidential space advisors like Gordon MacDonald have echoed this. - He explores the “capture theory,” where the Moon may have been placed in orbit by intelligent design. This lies in contrast to the theory that the conventional moon came from an impact of a Mars-sized object hitting the earth when it was forming 4.5B years ago. - Ancient myths of a “pre-moon era” in various cultures may hint at an alternative history Celestial Architecture of the Solar System: - Our solar system behaves like a geometric structure tuned for resonance and balance. - Planetary ratios, cometary capture dynamics, and the Earth-Sun-Moon proportions suggest intentional design over randomness. - Even small changes in planet spacing would eliminate comet transfer, disrupting life-essential cycles. Meteor Streams and the Next Impact Cycle: - Carlson believes we are within a cyclical window of cosmic bombardment from the Taurid meteor stream. - The Younger Dryas extinction was likely caused by this stream, and the same pattern could strike again. - He warns that current governments are unprepared for the scale of devastation possible from even a small cosmic event. Spiritual Knowledge, Freemasonry, and the Great Work: - The connection between esoteric wisdom with geological and astronomical truths. - He sees Freemasonry as a custodian of ancient science (architecture, sacred geometry, and cosmic harmony). - The mythos of Atlantis, the Holy Grail, and sacred architecture all point to a forgotten lineage of spiritual technology. The 144,000 and Humanity’s Rescue Mission: - Referencing biblical numerology and Masonic lore, Carlson proposes that if 144,000 awakened individuals emerge, humanity can avert collapse. - These individuals represent a return to divine order, ie. A planetary “resonance field” of healing, remembrance, and rebirth. Parapsychology, UFOs, and the Interface of Consciousness: - Carlson leans into the idea that UFOs may be consciousness-reactive vehicles. - He references Ben Rich of Lockheed and Princeton’s PEAR lab, suggesting that telepathy or psi might be central to advanced propulsion. - This suggests a civilization where the spiritual and technological are not separate, but one. #JesseMichels #RandallCarlson #ArtificialMoon #MoonMysteries #AncientTechnology #EsotericKnowledge #ForbiddenHistory #ConsciousnessExploration #HiddenCivilizations #CosmicSecrets #UFODisclosure #AlternativeScience #AstroTheology #OccultSymbolism
1:32

🚨 Atlantis, the Moon, and Periodic Cataclysms 🚨 | Is humanity on the brink of remembering a forgotten past? In this wildly speculative and captivating episode, Randall Carlson – a freemason, geologist, and perennial mystery hunter – dives into ancient civilizations, lost science, and the mind-bending idea that the Moon may have been a geoengineered haven for survivors of an ancient cataclysm. Carlson makes a startling case for a lost golden age, shattered by cosmic impact, and argues that our future hinges on remembering this hidden legacy. He also challenges mainstream narratives around the Shroud of Turin, arguing that the carbon dating was flawed—and that the man imprinted on the cloth was alive when it was created, upending centuries of skepticism. Key Revelations: The Atlantis Hypothesis and Sunken Continents: - Carlson locates Atlantis on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, now submerged beneath the ocean. - Submerged shorelines, ocean core samples, and isostatic rebound data support the idea that large landmasses sank post-Ice Age. - The Azores are the mountaintops of a once-thriving Atlantic civilization, strategically located between Africa, Europe, and the Americas. The Moon: A Possible Artificial Construct: - Carlson points to bizarre lunar anomalies: perfect size-distance ratios from the sun, synchronous rotation, and hollowness (outer layers seem less dense than inner layers, which pattern matches to hollow structures and excavation sites). Presidential space advisors like Gordon MacDonald have echoed this. - He explores the “capture theory,” where the Moon may have been placed in orbit by intelligent design. This lies in contrast to the theory that the conventional moon came from an impact of a Mars-sized object hitting the earth when it was forming 4.5B years ago. - Ancient myths of a “pre-moon era” in various cultures may hint at an alternative history Celestial Architecture of the Solar System: - Our solar system behaves like a geometric structure tuned for resonance and balance. - Planetary ratios, cometary capture dynamics, and the Earth-Sun-Moon proportions suggest intentional design over randomness. - Even small changes in planet spacing would eliminate comet transfer, disrupting life-essential cycles. Meteor Streams and the Next Impact Cycle: - Carlson believes we are within a cyclical window of cosmic bombardment from the Taurid meteor stream. - The Younger Dryas extinction was likely caused by this stream, and the same pattern could strike again. - He warns that current governments are unprepared for the scale of devastation possible from even a small cosmic event. Spiritual Knowledge, Freemasonry, and the Great Work: - The connection between esoteric wisdom with geological and astronomical truths. - He sees Freemasonry as a custodian of ancient science (architecture, sacred geometry, and cosmic harmony). - The mythos of Atlantis, the Holy Grail, and sacred architecture all point to a forgotten lineage of spiritual technology. The 144,000 and Humanity’s Rescue Mission: - Referencing biblical numerology and Masonic lore, Carlson proposes that if 144,000 awakened individuals emerge, humanity can avert collapse. - These individuals represent a return to divine order, ie. A planetary “resonance field” of healing, remembrance, and rebirth. Parapsychology, UFOs, and the Interface of Consciousness: - Carlson leans into the idea that UFOs may be consciousness-reactive vehicles. - He references Ben Rich of Lockheed and Princeton’s PEAR lab, suggesting that telepathy or psi might be central to advanced propulsion. - This suggests a civilization where the spiritual and technological are not separate, but one. #JesseMichels #RandallCarlson #ArtificialMoon #MoonMysteries #AncientTechnology #EsotericKnowledge #ForbiddenHistory #ConsciousnessExploration #HiddenCivilizations #CosmicSecrets #UFODisclosure #AlternativeScience #AstroTheology #OccultSymbolism

Jesse Michels

52,295 次观看 • 1 年前