Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨MIC DROP: Jack Smith NUKES Rep. Kiley! Asked if he made mistakes or has regrets, Smith fires back: “If I have any regret… it would be not expressing enough appreciation for my staff… We follow the facts and the law.” Jack Smith is completely humiliating Republicans.

CalltoActivism's profile picture

CALL TO ACTIVISM

1,214,020 subscribers

428,315 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

ComedyNachrichten & PolitikGesundheit & Wellness
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Kiley: Do you have any regrets as to how you conducted this investigation? Smith: If I have any regret, it would be not expressing enough appreciation for my staff who worked so hard in these investigations. We followed the facts and the law. These people who work for me sacrificed endlessly and have endured way too much for just doing their job. So if anything, I wish that I had thanked them. Kiley: No mistakes. There's that humility Raskin: I'm just sorry that you had to be lectured about humility and restraint by a politician
1:14

Kiley: Do you have any regrets as to how you conducted this investigation? Smith: If I have any regret, it would be not expressing enough appreciation for my staff who worked so hard in these investigations. We followed the facts and the law. These people who work for me sacrificed endlessly and have endured way too much for just doing their job. So if anything, I wish that I had thanked them. Kiley: No mistakes. There's that humility Raskin: I'm just sorry that you had to be lectured about humility and restraint by a politician

Acyn

148,113 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Fun MAGA facts: *Jack Smith wanted to testify publicly. Republicans said “No” *Gym Jordan “can’t get into details” because they exonerate Smith and implicate Trump. *The transcript will not be made public. *Jack Smith never took the 5th. *Trump is a pedo.
2:37

Fun MAGA facts: *Jack Smith wanted to testify publicly. Republicans said “No” *Gym Jordan “can’t get into details” because they exonerate Smith and implicate Trump. *The transcript will not be made public. *Jack Smith never took the 5th. *Trump is a pedo.

BigBlueWaveUSA2026® 🇺🇸🌊🇺🇦

163,625 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Jim Jordan has to ask Jack Smith THREE TIMES if he ever confirmed his star witnesses' testimony. Fraud Jack Smith then admits no one could back up the insane claims made against President Trump. SMITH: "We interviewed another witness...who did not confirm..."
1:02

Jim Jordan has to ask Jack Smith THREE TIMES if he ever confirmed his star witnesses' testimony. Fraud Jack Smith then admits no one could back up the insane claims made against President Trump. SMITH: "We interviewed another witness...who did not confirm..."

RNC Research

163,802 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Jack Smith understands what this was intended to be. A new superseding indictment has been filed. Drop a heart for Jack smith if you love him fighting for us.
2:00

Jack Smith understands what this was intended to be. A new superseding indictment has been filed. Drop a heart for Jack smith if you love him fighting for us.

L King

263,363 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 Texas Rep. Wesley Hunt says Republicans in Congress are ready to JAIL Biden Special Council Jack Smith: "Jack Smith is going to be the first person on this list. If he doesn't show up to Congress then he will be in jail. They put Steve Bannon in jail. Those are the rules..."
2:35

🚨 Texas Rep. Wesley Hunt says Republicans in Congress are ready to JAIL Biden Special Council Jack Smith: "Jack Smith is going to be the first person on this list. If he doesn't show up to Congress then he will be in jail. They put Steve Bannon in jail. Those are the rules..."

Benny Johnson

1,148,304 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

SCHIFF: Trump has said Jack Smith should go to jail. Will you investigate Jack Smith? BONDI: It would be irresponsible for me to answer the question
0:57

SCHIFF: Trump has said Jack Smith should go to jail. Will you investigate Jack Smith? BONDI: It would be irresponsible for me to answer the question

Aaron Rupar

43,118 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Jack Smith has to remind Democrats he didn’t charge President Trump with inciting an insurrection. Powerful testimony given Smith would have charged Trump with jaywalking if he could have proved it.
0:37

Jack Smith has to remind Democrats he didn’t charge President Trump with inciting an insurrection. Powerful testimony given Smith would have charged Trump with jaywalking if he could have proved it.

Select Subcommittee on January 6th

17,988 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Rep. Michael Rulli: "Jack Smith, in my opinion, this is treasonous. Let that word sink it. That's what this is. Jack Smith and his little clownies will destroy this republic ... they say with the snake, you cut off the head. If he's leading this, we have to let future people know we're not gonna put up with this."
1:23

Rep. Michael Rulli: "Jack Smith, in my opinion, this is treasonous. Let that word sink it. That's what this is. Jack Smith and his little clownies will destroy this republic ... they say with the snake, you cut off the head. If he's leading this, we have to let future people know we're not gonna put up with this."

Aaron Rupar

282,839 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨Rep. Wesley Hunt says Jack Smith will be the #1 target in investigations of lawfare against President Trump: "Jack Smith is going to be the first person on this list. If he doesn't show up to Congress.. he will be in jail. They put Bannon in jail. Those are the rules.”
2:35

🚨Rep. Wesley Hunt says Jack Smith will be the #1 target in investigations of lawfare against President Trump: "Jack Smith is going to be the first person on this list. If he doesn't show up to Congress.. he will be in jail. They put Bannon in jail. Those are the rules.”

Benny Johnson

171,724 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Jack Smith: If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Republican or a Democrat.
0:23

Jack Smith: If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Republican or a Democrat.

Acyn

98,833 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Jack Smith is a liar and a scum bag! Rep Gill is one of the best we have!
1:09

Jack Smith is a liar and a scum bag! Rep Gill is one of the best we have!

Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸

41,933 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Sen. DURBIN: Jack Smith is not hiding. He is not avoiding testimony under oath. Jack Smith volunteered to come before our committee, but the Chairman didn’t take advantage of it. All Republicans need to do is push the open door.
1:16

Sen. DURBIN: Jack Smith is not hiding. He is not avoiding testimony under oath. Jack Smith volunteered to come before our committee, but the Chairman didn’t take advantage of it. All Republicans need to do is push the open door.

Senate Judiciary Democrats 🇺🇸

42,019 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Jack Smith has MET HIS MATCH, he was just STUNNED by Trump ally Rep. Harriet Hageman "You would have been THROWN OUT on your EAR!" 🔥🔥 HAGEMAN: Would you agree Hutchinson's testimony was hearsay?! SMITH: ...uh... HAGEMAN: "COME ON, you're an attorney. OF COURSE it was hearsay! And hearsay isn't admissible in a court of law, is it? Why? Because it is inherently unreliable and the target of a prosecution is not able to cross-examine. Isn't that correct?" "In fact, Mr. Smith, if you had attempted to walk into court with Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony, you would have been THROWN OUT on your EAR!" "No judge, no legitimate judge would have ever allowed the testimony of Cassidy Hutchinson to be admitted in a court of law, would they?" SMITH: "...I disagree." HAGEMAN: "Well, we've already talked about your record, so I can understand why! I yield back." Bring an INDICTMENT against Jack Smith!
1:09

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Jack Smith has MET HIS MATCH, he was just STUNNED by Trump ally Rep. Harriet Hageman "You would have been THROWN OUT on your EAR!" 🔥🔥 HAGEMAN: Would you agree Hutchinson's testimony was hearsay?! SMITH: ...uh... HAGEMAN: "COME ON, you're an attorney. OF COURSE it was hearsay! And hearsay isn't admissible in a court of law, is it? Why? Because it is inherently unreliable and the target of a prosecution is not able to cross-examine. Isn't that correct?" "In fact, Mr. Smith, if you had attempted to walk into court with Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony, you would have been THROWN OUT on your EAR!" "No judge, no legitimate judge would have ever allowed the testimony of Cassidy Hutchinson to be admitted in a court of law, would they?" SMITH: "...I disagree." HAGEMAN: "Well, we've already talked about your record, so I can understand why! I yield back." Bring an INDICTMENT against Jack Smith!

Eric Daugherty

971,315 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Jack Smith has MET HIS MATCH, he was just STUNNED by Trump ally Rep. Harriet Hageman "You would have been THROWN OUT on your EAR!" 🔥🔥 HAGEMAN: Would you agree Hutchinson's testimony was hearsay?! SMITH: ...uh... HAGEMAN: "COME ON, you're an attorney. OF COURSE it was hearsay! And hearsay isn't admissible in a court of law, is it? Why? Because it is inherently unreliable and the target of a prosecution is not able to cross-examine. Isn't that correct?" "In fact, Mr. Smith, if you had attempted to walk into court with Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony, you would have been THROWN OUT on your EAR!" "No judge, no legitimate judge would have ever allowed the testimony of Cassidy Hutchinson to be admitted in a court of law, would they?" SMITH: "...I disagree." HAGEMAN: "Well, we've already talked about your record, so I can understand why! I yield back." Bring an INDICTMENT against Jack Smith!
1:09

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Jack Smith has MET HIS MATCH, he was just STUNNED by Trump ally Rep. Harriet Hageman "You would have been THROWN OUT on your EAR!" 🔥🔥 HAGEMAN: Would you agree Hutchinson's testimony was hearsay?! SMITH: ...uh... HAGEMAN: "COME ON, you're an attorney. OF COURSE it was hearsay! And hearsay isn't admissible in a court of law, is it? Why? Because it is inherently unreliable and the target of a prosecution is not able to cross-examine. Isn't that correct?" "In fact, Mr. Smith, if you had attempted to walk into court with Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony, you would have been THROWN OUT on your EAR!" "No judge, no legitimate judge would have ever allowed the testimony of Cassidy Hutchinson to be admitted in a court of law, would they?" SMITH: "...I disagree." HAGEMAN: "Well, we've already talked about your record, so I can understand why! I yield back." Bring an INDICTMENT against Jack Smith!

QUANTUM GUARD ™️

302,813 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

"If this is worse than Watergate, isn't it about time we get to the primary source: Jack Smith under oath?" -- Durbin points out the ridiculousness of Republicans holding conspiracy hearings about Jack Smith while refusing to allow him to testify on camera
1:52

"If this is worse than Watergate, isn't it about time we get to the primary source: Jack Smith under oath?" -- Durbin points out the ridiculousness of Republicans holding conspiracy hearings about Jack Smith while refusing to allow him to testify on camera

Aaron Rupar

307,777 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

—John Berman: "If he was not going to be president in six days, he would have been a convicted federal felon. That is the thrust of the final report" from Jack Smith. "It is an extraordinary document for posterity, if nothing else, and there will be nothing else."
0:30

—John Berman: "If he was not going to be president in six days, he would have been a convicted federal felon. That is the thrust of the final report" from Jack Smith. "It is an extraordinary document for posterity, if nothing else, and there will be nothing else."

Brian Stelter

593,582 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

If they thought Jack Smith were obviously in the wrong, maybe congressional Republicans would just let him talk. Instead, they didn't let him get a word in edgewise. Why? Will Saletan on the Jack Smith hearing:
0:35

If they thought Jack Smith were obviously in the wrong, maybe congressional Republicans would just let him talk. Instead, they didn't let him get a word in edgewise. Why? Will Saletan on the Jack Smith hearing:

The Bulwark

12,573 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

JACK SMITH TO TESTIFY PUBLICLY “Tomorrow, ex-special counsel Jack Smith will testify publicly before the House Judiciary Committee…If anyone better represents the vengeful, reckless, punitive, destructive lawfare against Donald Trump and his associates…It is special counsel Jack Smith.” -Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 details for Bannon’s WarRoom.
6:24

JACK SMITH TO TESTIFY PUBLICLY “Tomorrow, ex-special counsel Jack Smith will testify publicly before the House Judiciary Committee…If anyone better represents the vengeful, reckless, punitive, destructive lawfare against Donald Trump and his associates…It is special counsel Jack Smith.” -Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 details for Bannon’s WarRoom.

Real America's Voice (RAV)

14,664 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Jack Smith asking for the charges to be dismissed means that Trump cannot have Pam Bondi kill the prosecution once he takes office. Smart decision by Jack Smith.
1:04

Jack Smith asking for the charges to be dismissed means that Trump cannot have Pam Bondi kill the prosecution once he takes office. Smart decision by Jack Smith.

Piyush Mittal 🇺🇸🇺🇦🟧🌊🌈

345,489 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr