Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🚨MIC DROP: Jack Smith NUKES Rep. Kiley! Asked if he made mistakes or has regrets, Smith fires back: “If I have any regret… it would be not expressing enough appreciation for my staff… We follow the facts and the law.” Jack Smith is completely humiliating Republicans.

CalltoActivism's profile picture

CALL TO ACTIVISM

1,214,020 subscribers

428,315 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

ЮморНовости и политикаЗдоровье и велнес
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Kiley: Do you have any regrets as to how you conducted this investigation? Smith: If I have any regret, it would be not expressing enough appreciation for my staff who worked so hard in these investigations. We followed the facts and the law. These people who work for me sacrificed endlessly and have endured way too much for just doing their job. So if anything, I wish that I had thanked them. Kiley: No mistakes. There's that humility Raskin: I'm just sorry that you had to be lectured about humility and restraint by a politician
1:14

Kiley: Do you have any regrets as to how you conducted this investigation? Smith: If I have any regret, it would be not expressing enough appreciation for my staff who worked so hard in these investigations. We followed the facts and the law. These people who work for me sacrificed endlessly and have endured way too much for just doing their job. So if anything, I wish that I had thanked them. Kiley: No mistakes. There's that humility Raskin: I'm just sorry that you had to be lectured about humility and restraint by a politician

Acyn

148,380 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Fun MAGA facts: *Jack Smith wanted to testify publicly. Republicans said “No” *Gym Jordan “can’t get into details” because they exonerate Smith and implicate Trump. *The transcript will not be made public. *Jack Smith never took the 5th. *Trump is a pedo.
2:37

Fun MAGA facts: *Jack Smith wanted to testify publicly. Republicans said “No” *Gym Jordan “can’t get into details” because they exonerate Smith and implicate Trump. *The transcript will not be made public. *Jack Smith never took the 5th. *Trump is a pedo.

BigBlueWaveUSA2026® 🇺🇸🌊🇺🇦

163,625 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Jim Jordan has to ask Jack Smith THREE TIMES if he ever confirmed his star witnesses' testimony. Fraud Jack Smith then admits no one could back up the insane claims made against President Trump. SMITH: "We interviewed another witness...who did not confirm..."
1:02

Jim Jordan has to ask Jack Smith THREE TIMES if he ever confirmed his star witnesses' testimony. Fraud Jack Smith then admits no one could back up the insane claims made against President Trump. SMITH: "We interviewed another witness...who did not confirm..."

RNC Research

163,802 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🚨 Texas Rep. Wesley Hunt says Republicans in Congress are ready to JAIL Biden Special Council Jack Smith: "Jack Smith is going to be the first person on this list. If he doesn't show up to Congress then he will be in jail. They put Steve Bannon in jail. Those are the rules..."
2:35

🚨 Texas Rep. Wesley Hunt says Republicans in Congress are ready to JAIL Biden Special Council Jack Smith: "Jack Smith is going to be the first person on this list. If he doesn't show up to Congress then he will be in jail. They put Steve Bannon in jail. Those are the rules..."

Benny Johnson

1,148,326 просмотров • 1 год назад

Rep. Michael Rulli: "Jack Smith, in my opinion, this is treasonous. Let that word sink it. That's what this is. Jack Smith and his little clownies will destroy this republic ... they say with the snake, you cut off the head. If he's leading this, we have to let future people know we're not gonna put up with this."
1:23

Rep. Michael Rulli: "Jack Smith, in my opinion, this is treasonous. Let that word sink it. That's what this is. Jack Smith and his little clownies will destroy this republic ... they say with the snake, you cut off the head. If he's leading this, we have to let future people know we're not gonna put up with this."

Aaron Rupar

282,839 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Jack Smith: If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Republican or a Democrat.
0:23

Jack Smith: If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Republican or a Democrat.

Acyn

98,833 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Jack Smith has MET HIS MATCH, he was just STUNNED by Trump ally Rep. Harriet Hageman "You would have been THROWN OUT on your EAR!" 🔥🔥 HAGEMAN: Would you agree Hutchinson's testimony was hearsay?! SMITH: ...uh... HAGEMAN: "COME ON, you're an attorney. OF COURSE it was hearsay! And hearsay isn't admissible in a court of law, is it? Why? Because it is inherently unreliable and the target of a prosecution is not able to cross-examine. Isn't that correct?" "In fact, Mr. Smith, if you had attempted to walk into court with Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony, you would have been THROWN OUT on your EAR!" "No judge, no legitimate judge would have ever allowed the testimony of Cassidy Hutchinson to be admitted in a court of law, would they?" SMITH: "...I disagree." HAGEMAN: "Well, we've already talked about your record, so I can understand why! I yield back." Bring an INDICTMENT against Jack Smith!
1:09

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Jack Smith has MET HIS MATCH, he was just STUNNED by Trump ally Rep. Harriet Hageman "You would have been THROWN OUT on your EAR!" 🔥🔥 HAGEMAN: Would you agree Hutchinson's testimony was hearsay?! SMITH: ...uh... HAGEMAN: "COME ON, you're an attorney. OF COURSE it was hearsay! And hearsay isn't admissible in a court of law, is it? Why? Because it is inherently unreliable and the target of a prosecution is not able to cross-examine. Isn't that correct?" "In fact, Mr. Smith, if you had attempted to walk into court with Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony, you would have been THROWN OUT on your EAR!" "No judge, no legitimate judge would have ever allowed the testimony of Cassidy Hutchinson to be admitted in a court of law, would they?" SMITH: "...I disagree." HAGEMAN: "Well, we've already talked about your record, so I can understand why! I yield back." Bring an INDICTMENT against Jack Smith!

Eric Daugherty

971,917 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Jack Smith has MET HIS MATCH, he was just STUNNED by Trump ally Rep. Harriet Hageman "You would have been THROWN OUT on your EAR!" 🔥🔥 HAGEMAN: Would you agree Hutchinson's testimony was hearsay?! SMITH: ...uh... HAGEMAN: "COME ON, you're an attorney. OF COURSE it was hearsay! And hearsay isn't admissible in a court of law, is it? Why? Because it is inherently unreliable and the target of a prosecution is not able to cross-examine. Isn't that correct?" "In fact, Mr. Smith, if you had attempted to walk into court with Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony, you would have been THROWN OUT on your EAR!" "No judge, no legitimate judge would have ever allowed the testimony of Cassidy Hutchinson to be admitted in a court of law, would they?" SMITH: "...I disagree." HAGEMAN: "Well, we've already talked about your record, so I can understand why! I yield back." Bring an INDICTMENT against Jack Smith!
1:09

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Jack Smith has MET HIS MATCH, he was just STUNNED by Trump ally Rep. Harriet Hageman "You would have been THROWN OUT on your EAR!" 🔥🔥 HAGEMAN: Would you agree Hutchinson's testimony was hearsay?! SMITH: ...uh... HAGEMAN: "COME ON, you're an attorney. OF COURSE it was hearsay! And hearsay isn't admissible in a court of law, is it? Why? Because it is inherently unreliable and the target of a prosecution is not able to cross-examine. Isn't that correct?" "In fact, Mr. Smith, if you had attempted to walk into court with Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony, you would have been THROWN OUT on your EAR!" "No judge, no legitimate judge would have ever allowed the testimony of Cassidy Hutchinson to be admitted in a court of law, would they?" SMITH: "...I disagree." HAGEMAN: "Well, we've already talked about your record, so I can understand why! I yield back." Bring an INDICTMENT against Jack Smith!

QUANTUM GUARD ™️

303,085 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

—John Berman: "If he was not going to be president in six days, he would have been a convicted federal felon. That is the thrust of the final report" from Jack Smith. "It is an extraordinary document for posterity, if nothing else, and there will be nothing else."
0:30

—John Berman: "If he was not going to be president in six days, he would have been a convicted federal felon. That is the thrust of the final report" from Jack Smith. "It is an extraordinary document for posterity, if nothing else, and there will be nothing else."

Brian Stelter

593,605 просмотров • 1 год назад

Per MS NOW: Former Special Counsel Jack Smith says the Trump administration’s investigations into figures like James Comey, Letitia James, and Jerome Powell are driven by politics; not criminal evidence. “There’s not criminality here… The only reasonable explanation is the president has it out for these people.” Smith added that he believes officials are acting “regardless of the facts or the law.”
1:45

Per MS NOW: Former Special Counsel Jack Smith says the Trump administration’s investigations into figures like James Comey, Letitia James, and Jerome Powell are driven by politics; not criminal evidence. “There’s not criminality here… The only reasonable explanation is the president has it out for these people.” Smith added that he believes officials are acting “regardless of the facts or the law.”

Brian Allen

33,371 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Jack Smith: "I am not a politician and I have no partisan loyalties. My career has been dedicated to serving our country by upholding the rule of law."
0:26

Jack Smith: "I am not a politician and I have no partisan loyalties. My career has been dedicated to serving our country by upholding the rule of law."

Thomas Sowell Quotes

15,361 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Jack Smith spied on us, and there have to be consequences. I asked the U.S. Department of Justice to conduct a full investigation, and he should be disbarred in the states where he is licensed to practice law.
0:45

Jack Smith spied on us, and there have to be consequences. I asked the U.S. Department of Justice to conduct a full investigation, and he should be disbarred in the states where he is licensed to practice law.

Sen. Marsha Blackburn

58,125 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

REP. BRANDON GILL TORCHED JACK SMITH. Jack Smith’s move was straight-up UNCONSTITUTIONAL — a clear violation of the Speech and Debate Clause. He and the Democrats weaponized the law against his political opponents. Enough is enough. Time to hold him accountable for his crimes. #JackSmith #WeaponizedJustice #TwoTieredSystem #Accountability
2:21

REP. BRANDON GILL TORCHED JACK SMITH. Jack Smith’s move was straight-up UNCONSTITUTIONAL — a clear violation of the Speech and Debate Clause. He and the Democrats weaponized the law against his political opponents. Enough is enough. Time to hold him accountable for his crimes. #JackSmith #WeaponizedJustice #TwoTieredSystem #Accountability

GRANDPA’s FREE ADVICE

15,874 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Jack Smith: James Comey, Letitia James, Jerome Powell. There's not criminality here. I mean, seashells?? The only reasonable explanation is the president has it out for these people. He has people who are his former personal lawyers who are going to do what he says, regardless of the facts or law
1:35

Jack Smith: James Comey, Letitia James, Jerome Powell. There's not criminality here. I mean, seashells?? The only reasonable explanation is the president has it out for these people. He has people who are his former personal lawyers who are going to do what he says, regardless of the facts or law

Acyn

74,927 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

BREAKING: Special Counsel Jack Smith has just asked the Supreme Court to rule on whether a President has absolute immunity for crimes he/she committed while in office. Smith is trying to circumvent Trump’s appeal, which would possibly delay the trial until after the election. Smith has asked the SCOTUS to act quickly. If they do, it would likely mean that Trump would have to face trial in the January 6th case before the 2024 election. If they don’t, Trump might just get what he hopes for and delate the trial until after the election. (video from when the indictment against Trump was unsealed)
0:58

BREAKING: Special Counsel Jack Smith has just asked the Supreme Court to rule on whether a President has absolute immunity for crimes he/she committed while in office. Smith is trying to circumvent Trump’s appeal, which would possibly delay the trial until after the election. Smith has asked the SCOTUS to act quickly. If they do, it would likely mean that Trump would have to face trial in the January 6th case before the 2024 election. If they don’t, Trump might just get what he hopes for and delate the trial until after the election. (video from when the indictment against Trump was unsealed)

Ed Krassenstein

1,107,015 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Jack Smith is becoming a household name and not for very good reasons. Today, I sent a letter to Attorney General Pamela Bondi calling on the DOJ to investigate Jack Smith for the Biden FBI spying scandal. He must be held accountable for targeting his political opponents.
0:26

Jack Smith is becoming a household name and not for very good reasons. Today, I sent a letter to Attorney General Pamela Bondi calling on the DOJ to investigate Jack Smith for the Biden FBI spying scandal. He must be held accountable for targeting his political opponents.

Sen. Marsha Blackburn

118,951 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Even CNN is now turning on Jack Smith after his House Judiciary testimony. CNN legal analyst Elie Honig zeroed in on the moment Republicans cornered Smith over rushing the Trump case right before the 2024 election — and Smith had no answer. HONIG: “To your question, Brianna, the last Congressman we saw brought up the fact that jack Smith demanded a trial date four months out, five months out in a case involving 13 MILLION pages of documents.” “There is no defense lawyer in the country who can constitutionally prepare for trial and defend his client on that short of time frame.” “The implication was you were rushing to get this in before the 2024 election.” “Jack Smith did not defend himself, by the way. He didn’t say a word about that, which I found, I found striking.” “And Jack Smith has always maintained this veneer that he never thought about the election…of course he did!” “Why would would you demand such a quick trial date?”
0:37

Even CNN is now turning on Jack Smith after his House Judiciary testimony. CNN legal analyst Elie Honig zeroed in on the moment Republicans cornered Smith over rushing the Trump case right before the 2024 election — and Smith had no answer. HONIG: “To your question, Brianna, the last Congressman we saw brought up the fact that jack Smith demanded a trial date four months out, five months out in a case involving 13 MILLION pages of documents.” “There is no defense lawyer in the country who can constitutionally prepare for trial and defend his client on that short of time frame.” “The implication was you were rushing to get this in before the 2024 election.” “Jack Smith did not defend himself, by the way. He didn’t say a word about that, which I found, I found striking.” “And Jack Smith has always maintained this veneer that he never thought about the election…of course he did!” “Why would would you demand such a quick trial date?”

Overton

397,286 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump says Jack Smith committed large-scale PERJURY during his testimony and must be PROSECUTED "Based on his testimony today, there is no question that Deranged Jack Smith should be prosecuted for his actions. He destroyed the lives of many innocent people, which has been his history as a prosecutor. At a minimum, he committed large scale perjury!" He's a criminal and a traitor. ARREST JACK SMITH!
1:42

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump says Jack Smith committed large-scale PERJURY during his testimony and must be PROSECUTED "Based on his testimony today, there is no question that Deranged Jack Smith should be prosecuted for his actions. He destroyed the lives of many innocent people, which has been his history as a prosecutor. At a minimum, he committed large scale perjury!" He's a criminal and a traitor. ARREST JACK SMITH!

Eric Daugherty

55,769 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

HOLY CRAP! It's getting HOT in Congress with Jack Smith! Rep. Darrell Issa just PINNED him against the wall over him SPYING on members of Congress. Jamie Ratskin tried to SHOUT DOWN Rep. Issa EVERY TIME he pressed Smith for a straight answer. Why are Democrats AIDING AND ABETTING Jack Smith every time a REAL QUESTION is asked?!? They should have their mics turned off. The American people DESERVE TO KNOW THE TRUTH!
6:11

HOLY CRAP! It's getting HOT in Congress with Jack Smith! Rep. Darrell Issa just PINNED him against the wall over him SPYING on members of Congress. Jamie Ratskin tried to SHOUT DOWN Rep. Issa EVERY TIME he pressed Smith for a straight answer. Why are Democrats AIDING AND ABETTING Jack Smith every time a REAL QUESTION is asked?!? They should have their mics turned off. The American people DESERVE TO KNOW THE TRUTH!

Gunther Eagleman™

207,723 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад