Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Mick Jagger has signed a petition opposing a plan that would provide affordable homes for at least 190 people because it would spoil his view from the other side of the river We can't afford a system that lets anything from rockstars to rare spiders block new development

141,616 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

11 Comments

Alys Denby's profile picture
Alys Denby1 year ago

More here

California Insider Show's profile picture
California Insider Show1 year ago

California’s insurance crisis is worsening as LA fires push premiums higher and coverage shrinks. Former Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones breaks down the financial burden, policy gaps, and what it means for homeowners.

Ike Ijeh's profile picture
Ike Ijeh1 year ago

Disingenuous. Jagger is one of 1,500+ locals (inc. their Labour MP) who oppose this tower because it's out of scale/character with the area, violates the site height limit of 6 storeys & marks yet more egregious private profiteering on London's premier public space, the Thames.

Stakeholder Consultant's profile picture
Stakeholder Consultant1 year ago

Why is it 50% social housing? Seems unfair on normal people who have to pay market rent.

Bea Johanssen's profile picture
Bea Johanssen1 year ago

The issue probably isn't that Mick Jagger objects, but that another 29-storey eyesore will be inflicted on London, and for vast profit.

LaoCaiLarry 🇹🇭🇬🇧🇵🇱's profile picture
LaoCaiLarry 🇹🇭🇬🇧🇵🇱1 year ago

Not going to British people though is it?

Vinny the Villian's profile picture
Vinny the Villian1 year ago

29 stories you mong. I wouldn’t want to look at that where I live, never mind if I had paid millions for a river view.

max's profile picture
max1 year ago

I live in the area and have written to my local MP, local planning committee, and local ward councillors in support of this development. The only response I was met with was skepticism as to why I'm supporting it as if I was being paid by developers or something 😅

Dot's profile picture
Dot1 year ago

He’s entitled to his opinion & to object if he wishes to. He’s a British resident about to be affected by changes isn’t he? You think he’s not entitled because why exactly?

Alexander Long's profile picture
Alexander Long1 year ago

It's way too tall for the area. No-one would have a problem with this building being redeveloped if it stuck to heights set out in the local plan. The problem is there are rules but developers get greedy and try to break them.

Maxwell Marlow 🇺🇦's profile picture
Maxwell Marlow 🇺🇦1 year ago

Disgraceful from @MickJagger!

Related Videos

Abbie Llewelyn, "Labour have accused the Greens of trying to block at least 42,000 homes being built, including 13,000 affordable homes" Zack Polanski, "Labour have hired a van with a big number on it, I don't know where they got it from" "Labour should be building the homes they promised rather than hiring vans outside Green party conferences" "There was a report yesterday that even the targets Labour set themselves, they are massively missing. If you set a target you should actually hit it" "We do have a housing crisis" "But what we also have is an affordability crisis" "It's about building the right homes, at the right price, at the right place" "What we see all too often with Labour councils is that they are building luxury unaffordable buildings" "They often knock down or destroy communities that are already there in the name of regeneration but don't replace the homes with affordable homes or council homes" "So I would reject the premise that the Greens are blocking any more developments than anyone else is" "But if a development is being blocked because it is an unaffordable luxury development, then I'm proud of any Green party council that does that" "We need to make sure that we are building the homes that people actually need, that are fit to live in, affordable and accessible" "And you only need to look at this Labour government where the Housing Secretary is going for curries with property developers for £2,000" "They are building homes based on vested interests" "They are building for profit" "As opposed to the actual housing needs that people have"

Farrukh

88,339 views • 4 months ago