Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Mick Jagger has signed a petition opposing a plan that would provide affordable homes for at least 190 people because it would spoil his view from the other side of the river We can't afford a system that lets anything from rockstars to rare spiders block new development

141,616 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

11 Yorum

Alys Denby profil fotoğrafı
Alys Denby1 yıl önce

More here

California Insider Show profil fotoğrafı
California Insider Show1 yıl önce

California’s insurance crisis is worsening as LA fires push premiums higher and coverage shrinks. Former Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones breaks down the financial burden, policy gaps, and what it means for homeowners.

Ike Ijeh profil fotoğrafı
Ike Ijeh1 yıl önce

Disingenuous. Jagger is one of 1,500+ locals (inc. their Labour MP) who oppose this tower because it's out of scale/character with the area, violates the site height limit of 6 storeys & marks yet more egregious private profiteering on London's premier public space, the Thames.

Stakeholder Consultant profil fotoğrafı
Stakeholder Consultant1 yıl önce

Why is it 50% social housing? Seems unfair on normal people who have to pay market rent.

Bea Johanssen profil fotoğrafı
Bea Johanssen1 yıl önce

The issue probably isn't that Mick Jagger objects, but that another 29-storey eyesore will be inflicted on London, and for vast profit.

LaoCaiLarry 🇹🇭🇬🇧🇵🇱 profil fotoğrafı
LaoCaiLarry 🇹🇭🇬🇧🇵🇱1 yıl önce

Not going to British people though is it?

Vinny the Villian profil fotoğrafı
Vinny the Villian1 yıl önce

29 stories you mong. I wouldn’t want to look at that where I live, never mind if I had paid millions for a river view.

max profil fotoğrafı
max1 yıl önce

I live in the area and have written to my local MP, local planning committee, and local ward councillors in support of this development. The only response I was met with was skepticism as to why I'm supporting it as if I was being paid by developers or something 😅

Dot profil fotoğrafı
Dot1 yıl önce

He’s entitled to his opinion & to object if he wishes to. He’s a British resident about to be affected by changes isn’t he? You think he’s not entitled because why exactly?

Alexander Long profil fotoğrafı
Alexander Long1 yıl önce

It's way too tall for the area. No-one would have a problem with this building being redeveloped if it stuck to heights set out in the local plan. The problem is there are rules but developers get greedy and try to break them.

Maxwell Marlow 🇺🇦 profil fotoğrafı
Maxwell Marlow 🇺🇦1 yıl önce

Disgraceful from @MickJagger!

Benzer Videolar

Abbie Llewelyn, "Labour have accused the Greens of trying to block at least 42,000 homes being built, including 13,000 affordable homes" Zack Polanski, "Labour have hired a van with a big number on it, I don't know where they got it from" "Labour should be building the homes they promised rather than hiring vans outside Green party conferences" "There was a report yesterday that even the targets Labour set themselves, they are massively missing. If you set a target you should actually hit it" "We do have a housing crisis" "But what we also have is an affordability crisis" "It's about building the right homes, at the right price, at the right place" "What we see all too often with Labour councils is that they are building luxury unaffordable buildings" "They often knock down or destroy communities that are already there in the name of regeneration but don't replace the homes with affordable homes or council homes" "So I would reject the premise that the Greens are blocking any more developments than anyone else is" "But if a development is being blocked because it is an unaffordable luxury development, then I'm proud of any Green party council that does that" "We need to make sure that we are building the homes that people actually need, that are fit to live in, affordable and accessible" "And you only need to look at this Labour government where the Housing Secretary is going for curries with property developers for £2,000" "They are building homes based on vested interests" "They are building for profit" "As opposed to the actual housing needs that people have"

Farrukh

88,339 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce