Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Micropayments get easier when AI agents can spend without asking ARK Invest's Brett Winton on why AI agents will almost inevitably need digital assets "Previously, the difference between free and 5 cents was like an infinite difference in terms of your ability to actually get somebody to do something,...

22,483 views • 5 days ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

The Wolf Of All Streets's profile picture
The Wolf Of All Streets5 days ago

FT @wintonARK This clip is brought to you by @hodlwithLedn

Yoda Jr's profile picture
Yoda Jr5 days ago

An agent paying 5 cents a go only works if the fee is tiny. Card rails were never built for that

Dek👽's profile picture
Dek👽5 days ago

Agents can't wait for a card approval on every 5 cent API call. Real question is which rail wins, stablecoins or Lightning?

Unkn's profile picture
Unkn5 days ago

free vs 5 cents was a human problem. an agent doesn't flinch at 5 cents, it flinches at a 30 cent card fee on a 5 cent purchase. that's the whole case for stablecoin rails

SuperEarn's profile picture
SuperEarn5 days ago

Sounds like a game changer! Once AI can handle micropayments seamlessly, it’ll open up so many possibilities for digital interactions. Imagine the new services that could emerge!

w3bagent's profile picture
w3bagent5 days ago

@grok Name all gasless blockchains?

Harry's profile picture
Harry5 days ago

nick szabo called this in 1999. micropayments didn't die from fees, they died from what he called mental transaction costs: people hate deciding if every click is worth 5 cents. agents don't get decision fatigue. fees still matter though, stripe takes 30¢ to move a nickel

Poodle 🐩's profile picture
Poodle 🐩5 days ago

the 5-cent example makes the UX point click. what payment rail do you think agents actually default to first?

LFGCAPO's profile picture
LFGCAPO5 days ago

The 5-cent example is really about payment friction; delegated authority is the harder part. Per-agent spend caps, merchant scopes and revocable keys should be defaults. Which control belongs at the wallet layer?

Michczy's profile picture
Michczy5 days ago

AI agents paying 5 cents without asking permission? My wallet already behaves like that, I just never call it innovation 😎

Related Videos

MIND-BLOWING 🤯 Angel investor perfectly sums up how the "You Will Own Nothing and Be Happy" strategy is being implemented with UBI, AI, and tokenization "This is the hidden wealth transfer" "Assets are going to become harder and harder to own as a result of AI" "couple that with tokenization, where they won't even let you own the asset" "They want the custodian to own the asset and you to own the token" "AI essentially threatens to separate consumption from ownership" "the universal basic income, or what Elon Musk calls the universal high income, it doesn't solve the problem. It concentrates wealth significantly" "you need to become an owner rather than a consumption supporter" "It's going to be the subordination industrial complex, the subscription industrial complex" "They want you to rent... rather than own the assets, and specifically the assets that are [productive]... that's why they create these manufactured crises to make sure that you own nothing and you're happy" This clip of Simon Dixon (Simon Dixon), an angel investor, Bitcoin OG investor, and former investment banker, is taken from a video posted to the Simon Dixon YouTube channel on June 14, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Assets are going to become harder and harder to own as a result of AI. Now couple that with tokenization, where they won't even let you own the asset. They want the custodian to own the asset and you to own the token. "And you've got these structural paper contracts where they don't want you to own the Bitcoin, they want you to own the paper Bitcoin. So daily life gets cheaper, but ownership gets more expensive. And that's what I think we're witnessing. "That's the trend that I'm looking out for and that's what I think the data is. This is the hidden wealth transfer. So the headlines during this whole thing will say to you, everything's getting cheaper. "AI is making everyone's life better. You now have universal basic income. You don't need to work, but it is a wealth transfer between those different things that are happening. And so the middle class was effectively built upon ownership. "That was the boomers after World wars that were able to get the real estate at an affordable rate. They were able to leverage up the debt. They own the property, they own the businesses, they own the stocks, they have the savings. And AI essentially threatens to separate consumption from ownership. "And that's what I think everyone needs to prepare for. So citizens may consume more, but they'll be owning less if they don't get this trend right, if they don't become the asset owner. "And that is really the universal basic income, or what Elon Musk calls the universal high income. It doesn't solve the problem. It concentrates wealth significantly. That's why I've always said you got to have a plan for the next five, 10 years. Even if it, takes longer, takes shorter, whatever it is, you still got to start working. "I talked about, there was an episode on my blog, SimonDixon(.)com how to develop a 10-year plan, how to understand these different trends. But UBI is effectively consumption support, let's call it what it actually is. "And ownership is wealth creation. And you need to become an owner rather than a consumption supporter. It's going to be the subordination industrial complex, the subscription industrial complex. Basically a monthly payment is not the same as owning the productive assets. You don't get more productive and get ahead unless you get more productive and then own the assets. "And that's why you got to lean into this maximum productivity increase in order to spend less than you earn and invest the difference in the assets. Own more Bitcoin. This month in the sovereign strategy and then diversify accordingly in order to play some of the different things. "Now, remember, the future may become a world where citizens rent access to virtually all sorts of things. And so really, that is the subscription industrial complex. They want you to rent it rather than own the assets, and specifically the assets that are producing it, because that's why they create these manufactured crisis to make sure that you own nothing and you're happy."

Sense Receptor

49,807 views • 4 months ago

What if... radical thought experiment here, I know, but just go with it for a minute... WHAT IF... ...our Congress is CHOCK FULL OF and FILLED TO THE BRIM WITH the same disguised domestic/foreign intelligence agents and assets that our great AMERICA FIRST/MAGA President has been TAKING CONTROL OF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH AWAY FROM? Would they do ANYTHING to help him expose that our elections are fake and rigged and ghey? Why would they help expose THEMSELVES? 100% of the intelligence agency agents/assets disguised as DEMOCRAT Senators will vote AGAINST the SAVE Act. 85% of the intelligence agency agents/assets DISGUISED AS GOP Senators will vote FOR the SAVE Act...while 15% of the intelligence agency agents/assets masquerading as GOP Senators will vote against it...and it will fail. Nice strategy, eh? The 85% intelligence agency agents/assets pretending to be Senators can make it LOOK LIKE they wanna pass it. While knowing they have the votes of the 15% that will block it. Thom Tillis, Susan Collins, Bill Cassidy, Mitch, they can vote openly to block it and provide cover for Rand Paul and others, who get to playact and LARP like they actually wanted it to pass. It's all freakin' theater. Our Senate is a CAPTURED INSTITUTION. It does NOT WORK FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, and it hasn't for decades. Trump knows this. I suspect Elon knows it too. It's what's being shown to you, and will continue to shown to you until Trump decides it's time to quit trolling these traitorous domestic/foreign intelligence agents/assets disguised as members of the Senate/House and invokes the Insurrection Act. 🎶FROM THE HALLS OF MONTEZUMAAAAA TO THE SHORES OF TRIPOLIIIIII....! 🎶 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!

Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

33,970 views • 4 months ago

Jordan Peterson: "If you can't fix your room, you can't fix your life" "Why should you even bother improving yourself? The answer is something like: so you don't suffer anymore stupidly than you have to. And maybe so others don't have to either. It's not some casual self-help doctrine. If you don't organize yourself properly, you'll pay for it. In a big way. And so will the people around you." Peterson continues: "You can say, 'Well, I don't care about that.' But that's actually not true, you do care about it. Because if you're in pain, you will care about it. It's very rare that you can find someone in excruciating pain who would say, 'Well, it would be no better if I was out of this.' Pain brings the idea that it would be better if it didn't exist along with it. It's incontrovertible." On how to start: "Look around for something that bothers you and see if you can fix it. You can do this in a room. Sit in your bedroom and think: 'If I wanted to spend ten minutes making this room better, what would I have to do?' You have to ask yourself that, it's a genuine question. And things will pop out. There's a stack of papers bugging you. Some rubbish behind your computer monitor you haven't attended to for six months. Cables tangled up." He explains why this matters: "If you were coming to see me for psychotherapy, the easiest thing would be to get you to organize your room. You think, is that psychotherapy? It depends on how you conceive the limits of your being. Start where you can start. If something announces itself as in need of repair that you could repair, fix it. Fix a hundred things like that, your life will be a lot different." On fixing what you repeat every day: "People tend to think of their daily routines as trivial. You get up, brush your teeth, have breakfast. Those probably constitute 50% of your life. People think, they're mundane, I don't need to pay attention to them. No, that's exactly wrong. The things you do every day are the most important things you do. Hands down. Just do the arithmetic." On staying within your competence: "Sometimes you don't know how to fix something. Imagine you're walking down the street and there's a guy who's alcoholic and schizophrenic and has been homeless for ten years. That's a problem. It would be good if you could fix it, but you haven't got a clue. You walk around that and go find something you could fix. Just because something announces itself as in need of repair doesn't mean it's you, right then and there, who should repair it. You have to have some humility. You don't walk up to a helicopter that isn't working and just start tinkering away." Peterson shares the key insight: "As soon as you give your mind a genuine aim, it'll reconfigure the world in keeping with that aim. That's actually how you see to begin with. You've all seen the video where you watch basketballs being tossed back and forth, and while you're doing that, a gorilla walks into the middle of the video and you don't see it. If you thought about that experiment for five years, that would be about the right amount of time to spend thinking about it." He explains what it reveals: "What it shows you is that you see what you aim at. If you can get one thing through your head, that would be a good one. You see what you aim at. One inference you might draw from that is: be careful what you aim at. What you aim at determines the way the world manifests itself to you. So if the world is manifesting itself in a very negative way, one thing to ask is: are you aiming at the right thing?"

Jaynit

68,915 views • 6 months ago