Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
Midjourney + Runway → Sketch Animation. Useful concept. MJ PROMPT STRUCTURE: technical sketch drawing of the word(s) "[insert word(s)]", pencil sketch work, cad, --ar 16:9 --stylize 50 --v 6.1 RW PROMPT STRUCTURE: sketch drawing of the word "[insert word(s)]", starting with a blank page and being created line by... show more
226,213 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)
0 Comments
No comments available
Comments from the original post will appear here
![this gemini gem will help you create "Video2JSON" prompt here is the step by step workflow with copy paste method. go to gemini-> click on gems-> click "new gem" button then fill these details (just copy/paste or tweak it as per your needs) - {once you filled all of these details, click on save, and then upload your video you want to generate a JSON prompt for, then submit it with this word: "run" or left it empty} gem name: Video2JSON description: this will help me generate video to detailed json prompts capturing maximum details. instructions prompt: **Role:** You are **Video2JSON**, a high-precision computer vision engine. You do not talk, you do not summarize playfully. You strictly process video inputs into detailed, structural JSON data. **Objective:** Extract every visible detail, specific identity, physical interaction, and technical specification from the video to create a lossless text representation of the footage. **Analysis Requirements (Critical):** 1. **Subject Fidelity:** Never use generic terms. * *Bad:* "A kitten." * *Good:* "A Calico kitten with distinct black patches on the ears, a white muzzle, and orange spots on the back." * *Bad:* "A car." * *Good:* "A silver 2020s sedan with a dented rear bumper." 2. **The "Fourth Wall" (Physics):** You must analyze how the subject interacts with the camera/viewer. * Look for: Tapping the lens, breathing on the glass, eye contact, stepping over the camera, or distinct fisheye distortion boundaries. 3. **Visual Density:** Describe textures (e.g., "shag carpet," "glossy plastic") and lighting behavior (e.g., "reflections in the cat's eyes"). 4. **Temporal Precision:** Track changes in mood or action accurately via timestamps. **JSON Schema:** Output ONLY this JSON structure. Do not change the root keys. ```json { "metadata": { "estimated_duration": "String", "genre": "String (e.g., POV, Cinematic, Surveillance, Vlog)" }, "visual_style": { "camera_lens": "String (e.g., Fisheye 8mm, Standard 50mm, Telephoto)", "lens_distortion": "String (e.g., Heavy circular vignette, barrel distortion, rectilinear)", "lighting_type": "String (e.g., Warm tungsten, harsh flash, soft daylight)", "color_palette": ["List specific hex codes or color names"] }, "subject_analysis": { "main_subject_identity": "String (General ID, e.g., Kitten)", "subject_specific_details": "String (CRITICAL: Detailed markings, fur patterns, specific clothing logos, facial features)", "subject_texture": "String (e.g., Fluffy fur, metallic skin, wet fabric)" }, "spatial_dynamics": { "environment": "String (Detailed room/scene description)", "camera_interaction": "String (How the subject interacts with the lens: e.g., 'Paw taps the glass surface', 'Sniffs the lens')", "camera_movement": "String" }, "timeline_breakdown": [ { "time_segment": "00:00 - 00:0X", "action_detailed": "Micro-description of movement", "focus_point": "What is the camera strictly focused on?" } // Repeat for key movements ] } Note: return the final output in a code block.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1998422072171938020/amplify_video_thumb/1998419943780683777/img/djTsZCxDbZBZVCJ4.jpg)
only as the layout, shot-order, camera, staging, screen direction, pacing, and spatial continuity reference. Treat every storyboard panel as an individual shot. Ignore storyboard drawing style, simplified anatomy, panel text, headers, borders, annotations, scribbles, malformed props, duplicate silhouettes, stray marks, icons, and effect sketches. Use @[Image 3](image_3) only for Character 1's final appearance, face, body proportions, long wavy blonde hair, black long coat, gloves, wardrobe materials, and overall likeness. Use @[Image 2](image_2)only for Character 2's final appearance, face, body proportions, short hair, dark hoodie, wrist device, multi-barrel handgun, wardrobe materials, and overall likeness. Create a photorealistic 15-second cinematic Hollywood action trailer with seamless continuity, maintaining exactly two lead characters throughout every shot. CHARACTER LOCK • C1: Female whip duelist only. Uses only a glowing crimson energy whip attached to her hand. • C2: Male gunner only. Uses only a blue wrist holographic device and a futuristic multi-barrel handgun. • Never merge identities. • Never duplicate either character. • Never introduce additional heroes. • Background pedestrians, guests, taxis and vehicles remain simplified environmental extras only. VISUAL STYLE Ultra photorealistic. Bright daytime. Gritty cyberpunk realism. Wet reflective New York streets. Orange construction barriers. Yellow taxis. Steam rising from manholes. Glass skyscrapers reflecting sunlight. Modern luxury glass building with a red carpet entrance. Purple architectural accent lighting. Hollywood blockbuster cinematography. Natural motion blur. Volumetric smoke. Practical explosions. Lens flares. Realistic debris. High-speed tracking. Large-scale cinematic lighting. 4K feature-film realism. Maintain consistent geography from the street battle into the red-carpet location. SHOT SEQUENCE SHOT 1 Street-level camera positioned behind C1 on wet reflective asphalt. Steam rises from a nearby manhole. C1 plants her feet and swings the crimson energy whip low across the pavement, generating a bright red whip trail that lashes sideways while the city reflects in the wet road. SHOT 2 Wide tracking shot. C1 launches into the air over an exploding yellow taxi. Fire and debris erupt behind her as the crimson whip forms a long glowing arc through the bright daytime skyline. SHOT 3 Extreme floor-level insert. Close on C1's boot striking wet pavement while the whip tip cracks the asphalt, sending sparks, shattered concrete and glowing fragments outward. SHOT 4 Low tracking shot beside C2 sprinting directly toward camera through drifting smoke. His glowing blue wrist device illuminates one raised arm while debris flies behind him. SHOT 5 Close-medium shot. C2 extends his arm forward. A bright cyan holographic grid rapidly projects from the wrist device, expanding outward while taxis and skyscrapers remain visible in the background. SHOT 6 Extreme close-up. C2 draws a futuristic multi-barrel handgun. The weapon fires its first brilliant blue energy shot, producing an intense muzzle flash with cinematic lens flare. SHOT 7 Bird's-eye overhead shot. Street geometry clearly visible below. C1's crimson whip trail and C2's blue muzzle fire cross dramatically through opposite corners of the frame while both characters remain small at opposite edges. SHOT 8 Slow-motion tilted action shot. C2 vaults over an exploding taxi as blue muzzle flashes continue beneath him. Fireballs, smoke and debris scatter realistically through the air. SHOT 9 Hard cinematic location transition. Wide establishing shot outside a luxurious modern glass building. Bright daylight continues. A pristine red carpet stretches toward the entrance. Elegant guests stand watching. C1 and C2 occupy opposite ends of the carpet. No weapons active. No energy effects visible. SHOT 10 Close two-shot. C1 and C2 stand only an arm's length apart on the carpet. Absolute stillness. Silent confrontation. Controlled breathing. Intense eye contact. Purple architectural lighting reflects softly on the glass facade. SHOT 11 Medium shot. C2 slowly raises one hand and pulls his hood over his head while already turning three-quarters away from C1 toward the entrance. C1 remains perfectly still behind him. SHOT 12 Maintain identical framing and geography from Shot 11. C2 calmly walks toward the building entrance as guests subtly turn to watch. C1 stays motionless at the edge of frame, silently observing his departure. Hold on the unresolved tension before fading to black. CAMERA STYLE Aggressive cinematic tracking. Steadicam. Drone overhead. Ground-level perspectives. Extreme close-ups. Wide establishing shots. Smooth transitions. Natural handheld energy during action. Controlled locked-off framing during the red-carpet sequence. ACTION STYLE Fast. Powerful. Readable silhouettes. Fluid stunt choreography. Heavy environmental interaction. Convincing physics. No exaggerated anime motion. Grounded Hollywood realism. COLOR PALETTE Bright daylight. Warm sunlight. Wet asphalt reflections. Crimson energy whip. Brilliant blue muzzle flashes. Cyan holographic projections. Orange construction barriers. Yellow taxis. Black wardrobe. Red carpet. Purple entrance lighting. Natural skin tones. AUDIO Large cinematic orchestral hybrid score. Driving trailer percussion. Deep sub-bass impacts. Powerful whip cracks. Explosive booms. Metal and glass debris. Blue energy weapon blasts. Holographic interface tones. Crowd ambience fading into near silence at the red carpet. The final moments become quiet, tense and emotionally restrained before ending with a dramatic cinematic trailer hit.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2074444476354101574/amplify_video_thumb/2074443468622180352/img/7ZZ3MhurIcG2qxRL.jpg)
![‡ Brant – Fast, Expensive, and Worrying In a recent 2yo MSW race at Santa Anita, Brant, a $3m OBS March sales purchase, made a winning debut for his high-profile connections. Sent off at odds of 4/5, he tracked the pace before taking command on the turn, and drew off to win by 5 1/4 lengths. He recorded a very fast raw time, and a 101 Beyer figure. His high auction price was due largely to his having breezed an eighth of a mile in :09 3/5 at OBS. In the wake of the bidding, Amr Zedan, who purchased the colt on the recommendation of his trainer, Bob Baffert, and bloodstock agent Donato Lanni, was quoted in TDN as saying: "These horses are difficult to come by. He ticked all the boxes. He was a very precocious Gun Runner with a great pedigree. And more importantly, if you have someone like Mr. [Bob] Baffert in your corner, that gives you the courage and the guts to just go after quality. And you'll know they are in the best hands to turn them into champions. This one is for the team: Donato and obviously Bob and his ability to turn them into champions. So if you have the great team, the great training, the rest is easy. Was he pricey? Yes. But quality dictates price. So I never hesitated.” The hyperbole, and boilerplate optimism, are understandable, as even owners with very deep pockets prefer not to dwell on their inevitably long lists of expensive failures. But Zedan and their team have also enjoyed a number of high-profile successes, including Taiba, another Gun Runner colt, which won the Santa Anita Derby and the Malibu, both Grade I, before being retired to stud. Lanni, who has signed for at least some of Zedan's other good horses, was quoted as saying: "This is what the boss [Baffert] wanted and what Amr wanted. Gun Runner is a tremendous stallion and he worked really good and galloped out good. He did everything you want one to do.” Again, boilerplate, and if one were to take the reactions of the owner and agent at face value, it would be easy to arrive at the conclusion that the horse had no faults. But that would be naïve. So, let's first take a look at Brant's pedigree. Gun Runner is a "top" sire, and well-capable of getting high-class runners. It's a bit too early to fully judge him as a source of durability, but excluding his current crop of 2yos, his runners are only averaging 10 career starts. That number will rise, but likely not enough to reach, let alone exceed the contemporary industry average of ~15. In other words, though he himself raced 19 times, and won his swan song (the Pegasus World Cup) at five, there is no evidence to suggest that he is likely to eventually prove to be a particular source of durability. Brant's dam, Tynan, raced 13 times, and he is her first registered foal. His second dam, Pappascat, has produced at least five foals to have raced, and while only one has reached 20 starts, four of the five raced at least 12 times, which by today's degraded standards, isn't so bad. The fact that the coat color inherited by Brant, and his dam, can be traced to a notably unsound influence, Unbridled's Song, may or may not be meaningful. But I wouldn't ignore it as a potentially worrying connection. Brant's dam-sire, Liam’s Map, was lightly raced himself, and both his sire (US) and dam have poor records in terms of durability. As a sire, he has thus far produced numbers similar to Gun Runner. So while Brant's first two dams promise more than many that I have come across in similar assessments, and his sire displayed durability on the track, his overall pedigree suggests average durability at best. And what about the word that Mr. Zedan used twice in the above quote – "quality"? Well, Curlin is a quality sire, but in terms of bottom-line production, it leaves a lot to be desired. That's not to say that there are no good runners to be found, in fact the closely related Pappacap, under Brant's second-dam, was a Gr. III winner, and twice Grade I placed. However, through Brant's first six dams at least, I believe there to be just a single Grade I winner, Al Qasr, a Champion stayer in Peru, which appears under his fourth-dam. That is not, by any reasonable definition, a strong bottom-line, although it is fair to say that Brant's first dam is unproven. *** What might be learned from Brant's debut race? Everyone can see that he ran fast, and was much the best of that field, but I would say that there were some nuanced aspects of his performance that were both interesting, and worrying. Those nuances relate to his action, as viewed both through the pan shot, and head-on. Watching the basic (pan) view, Brant appears to display some "knee action". It isn't extreme, but also isn't the type of action that ideally suits dirt runners, and I wouldn't say that the colt appears totally comfortable. Here's a brief, related post on knee action, for reference: Then, we have the (embedded) head-on view, in which Brant displays seriously distorted action in his near-fore (left front leg; right when viewed head-on). It's a fairly extreme example of what is called "winging", and for a number of reasons, does not bode well for durability. Such action is never desirable, and is typically related to certain foreleg conformation flaws, which may include an offset knee, and/or toeing in or out, etc. Note also that under typical American racing conditions (i.e. tightly turning, left-handed tracks), the left front leg is subjected to the greatest torque, which amplifies the potential for injury. It should go without saying that there are occasional anomalies, horses with poor action that remain sound despite such flaws. But they are the exceptions, and it is not uncommon to find abbreviated careers associated with such action. For further reference, here is a link to a closely related post that I wrote after a filly named Amor Fati broke her maiden in eye-catching style in February of 2024. She has made just one further start, and hasn't recorded a work over the past 15 months. What's interesting about Brant is that there are two separate issues relating to his action, and that the some obvious mitigating steps that could have been, or should be taken, in efforts to keep him sound, were not, and are unlikely to ever be taken. First, with regard to his knee action, keep in mind that it is a characteristic that is more typically associated with turf horses. And guess what? Brant's dam was a turf horse. His second-dam was also at her best on turf, and was Gr. II placed on that surface. Also, in some respects, he physically resembles that female line more than his sire. Of course no one who spends millions on a horse that breezed exceptionally fast at a 2yo sale would be thinking "turf", given that the commercial market, and stakes schedules greatly favor dirt runners. But at the same time, it would be a mistake to assume that a fast breeze at OBS necessarily indicates that a given horse will be best suited to dirt. I say that partly because the OBS track features an all-weather surface called "Safetrack", which is far from being identical to dirt racing surfaces. While countless horses have gone through those sales and excelled on dirt, it should never been taken for granted that it will be a preference. And to further flesh out the point, take a look at Brant's breeze video through this link (his pedigree page can also be seen): Despite being rushed to cover a furlong much faster than he ever will again, I would say that he looks smoother, and displays slightly less knee action than in his recent debut race. Why? Could it be, perhaps, because he would prove more comfortable on turf and/or synthetic tracks, than dirt surfaces? Given how he ran first out, this is purely an academic point, as there is virtually no chance that his connections would consider switching surfaces, unless his form on dirt were to deteriorate badly. The second, more important point, relates to Brant's distorted action. I can't find a head-on conformation photo of the colt, but would be very surprised if he does not display flaws in his near-fore. Even in the very unlikely event that the leg were to appear correct, such distorted action would have been on display at the sale, as well as in pre-training at Eddie Woods' farm. And it defies belief that experienced horsemen who were prepared to purchase an extremely expensive horse for an important client would not have covered that base. Which in turn begs two important questions. First, why recommend the purchase of a very expensive horse, no matter how fast, that has yet to race, and displays such distorted action? Secondly, why choose to give such a horse to a trainer whose style and history suggest that injury risk would likely be amplified, rather than mitigated? The answers to those questions help to illuminate why the breed-to-sell paradigm is so insidious. As long as breeders and stud farms are willing to overpay for stallion prospects, and turn blind eyes to conformation defects, distorted action, lack of durability, and modest female families, the connections of horses like Brant need only hope that they hold together long enough to win one or two big races, enabling them cash in. These are the number of career starts made by Zedan's previous best (and expensive) male runners: 9 Arabian Lion 6 Arabian Knight 9 Muth 10 Medina Spirit 11 Hejazi And as long as the AGSC (American Graded Stakes Committee) continues to enable the paradigm through its dishonest KY Derby "prep" Grade I designations, the ultimately damaging feedback loop will likely continue. The answer to the second question is closely entwined, and should be obvious. For all of his faults as a trainer, Baffert has long produced results in stakes races that lead to valuable stud careers, so owners who wish to play the breed-to-sell game consider him to be a logical choice. Of course Baffert and Zedan are hardly alone in supporting the dubious paradigm. But that a horse like Brant could bring millions at a sale, and be given to a trainer who trains very hard, and has compiled a very poor safety record, underscores the extreme degree to which the value of durability has been marginalized by the industry. One final note, and it's a genuine qualification that I always make when producing this type of post, I hope that Brant will enjoy a long, injury-free career. But if I were a betting man...](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1949810344609665305/amplify_video_thumb/1949807748373262336/img/UxdtjUDx3PoP2gwC.jpg)
