Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Might post something cause why not? Found this navigating through the internet lol credits to the original creator, she's a comedian #wedgie #wedgiemaster #wedgiegirl #thong #thongwedgie #shoulderwedgie #wedgienerd #wedgieslave #wedgiesub #dom #baby #ddlg #subgirl #girlslave

1 Kommentare

Profilbild von ilikepie5
ilikepie5vor 2 Jahren

What’s her name ??

Ähnliche Videos

Donnie Wahlberg speaks with raw clarity on the price of asking questions about vaccine safety. He reveals the deeply personal context: his wife, Jenny McCarthy, has a vaccine-injured son, Evan. Their private talks weren't just about getting to know each other, but about the "something else that comes along with me"—the palpable danger of having your rights trampled, your career threatened, and your character assassinated for simply seeking answers about what happened to her child. He observed a chilling pattern: "Anytime her name's mentioned... two comments after the article, and it's gonna be, 'she's crazy, she's this, she's that.'" Yet, his own research into her advocacy found a different truth. He never heard her tell anyone to not vaccinate, only to "be careful and ask questions." This was the logical path he himself took. He asked why. Why can't you talk about vaccine safety? Why is the mere act of questioning met with such ferocious opposition? He draws a powerful parallel: "You don't give a child who's 6 foot 4, 280 pounds the same dosage of an aspirin that you would give a child who's 4 foot 80 pounds. Why would you do it with vaccines?" Science, he argues, is not a locked doctrine. It evolves. "Pluto's a planet one week. It's not the next... What happened to castor oil curing all ills in the 40s?" If everything must be constantly researched and questioned, "why not here?" Why not with vaccines? His conclusion is a fundamental defense of parental rights and intellectual freedom: "If a woman has the right to choose whether or not she brings a child into this world, why doesn't she have a right to choose what she puts in that child until the child can make up its own mind?" This isn't about being anti-vaccine. It's about the basic human right to ask "why?" after a child is injured, without being labeled a kook. It's a stand for logic, for conversation, and for the freedom to protect your family without fear.

Camus

1,404,458 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten