Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Mike Cernovich Explains Why the United States Is Able to Pull Off Taking Out the Leaders of Iran and Venezuela Without Facing Geopolitical Ramifications from Russia or China: ‘American Tech Is Too Good’ “We didn’t want to do anything with Iran years ago because China and Russia were seen...

bennyjohnson's profile picture

Benny Johnson

4,143,163 subscribers

406,326 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Jensen to AI Leaders: “We have to be far more thoughtful” when communicating to the public Jensen Huang: “(AI) is not a biological being. It is not alien. It is not conscious. It is computer software.” “We say things like, ‘We don't understand it at all.’ It is not true. We understand a lot of things about this technology.” Chamath: “If you were in the seat in the boardroom of Anthropic over that whole scuttlebutt with the Department of War, what do you think you would've told Dario and that team to do, maybe, differently to try to change some of this outcome and some of this perception?” Jensen: “The first thing that I would say about Anthropic is, first of all, the technology is incredible. We are a large consumer of Anthropic technology.” “The desire to warn people about the capability of the technology is also really terrific.” “We just have to make sure that we understand that the world has a spectrum, and that warning is good, scaring is less good because this technology is too important to us.” “I think that it is fine to predict the future, but we need to be a little bit more circumspect. We need to have a little bit more humility, that, in fact, we can't completely predict the future.” “And to say things that are quite extreme, quite catastrophic, that there's no evidence of it happening, could be more damaging than people think.” “And of course we are technology leaders.” “There was a time when nobody listened to us, but now because technology is so important in the social fabric, such an important industry, so important to national security, our words do matter.” “And I think we have to be much more circumspect, we have to be more moderate, we have to be more balanced, we have to be far more thoughtful.”
1:27

Jensen to AI Leaders: “We have to be far more thoughtful” when communicating to the public Jensen Huang: “(AI) is not a biological being. It is not alien. It is not conscious. It is computer software.” “We say things like, ‘We don't understand it at all.’ It is not true. We understand a lot of things about this technology.” Chamath: “If you were in the seat in the boardroom of Anthropic over that whole scuttlebutt with the Department of War, what do you think you would've told Dario and that team to do, maybe, differently to try to change some of this outcome and some of this perception?” Jensen: “The first thing that I would say about Anthropic is, first of all, the technology is incredible. We are a large consumer of Anthropic technology.” “The desire to warn people about the capability of the technology is also really terrific.” “We just have to make sure that we understand that the world has a spectrum, and that warning is good, scaring is less good because this technology is too important to us.” “I think that it is fine to predict the future, but we need to be a little bit more circumspect. We need to have a little bit more humility, that, in fact, we can't completely predict the future.” “And to say things that are quite extreme, quite catastrophic, that there's no evidence of it happening, could be more damaging than people think.” “And of course we are technology leaders.” “There was a time when nobody listened to us, but now because technology is so important in the social fabric, such an important industry, so important to national security, our words do matter.” “And I think we have to be much more circumspect, we have to be more moderate, we have to be more balanced, we have to be far more thoughtful.”

The All-In Podcast

56,915 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨LoP Rahul Gandhi on US-Israel-Iran war: On the surface, it looks like a war between the US–Israel and Iran, but it is actually a conflict between America, China, and Russia. The conflict is taking place in Iran, Ukraine, and other places. The reality is that we have a superpower called the United States and a challenger called China. The United States is trying to ensure that it remains the superpower, while China is advancing closer to it. You will see that more and more conflicts of this nature are going to emerge. This is a transition period. We are now entering a violent and dangerous time. China is on our border and America is our ally, and they are getting ready to fight. India has to be very clear about its policy positions and how it maneuvers through these dangerous times. If we fail to do so and get caught in the fight, we will face serious problems. We have to be very careful about where we stand so that we do not suddenly get sucked into their fight.
4:07

🚨LoP Rahul Gandhi on US-Israel-Iran war: On the surface, it looks like a war between the US–Israel and Iran, but it is actually a conflict between America, China, and Russia. The conflict is taking place in Iran, Ukraine, and other places. The reality is that we have a superpower called the United States and a challenger called China. The United States is trying to ensure that it remains the superpower, while China is advancing closer to it. You will see that more and more conflicts of this nature are going to emerge. This is a transition period. We are now entering a violent and dangerous time. China is on our border and America is our ally, and they are getting ready to fight. India has to be very clear about its policy positions and how it maneuvers through these dangerous times. If we fail to do so and get caught in the fight, we will face serious problems. We have to be very careful about where we stand so that we do not suddenly get sucked into their fight.

Mohit Chauhan

16,910 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🇪🇺🇺🇸🇷🇺🇨🇳 Kallas, the EU's Chief Diplomat says the US looks weak and not credible, because they give in to Russia, but want to confront China! EU’s diplomacy is top notch these days. "I hear statements from some American officials who claim that it is impossible to defeat Russia, because it is much larger and more powerful. They say that we need to give in to it, because pressure will not work. But at the same time, these same people are convincing Asian allies that if China attacks, the United States will be on their side. At the same time, China has a much more powerful economy and a larger army than Russia. If we are not able to put enough pressure on Moscow together to have a real effect, then how can we claim that we can defeat China?"
1:06

🇪🇺🇺🇸🇷🇺🇨🇳 Kallas, the EU's Chief Diplomat says the US looks weak and not credible, because they give in to Russia, but want to confront China! EU’s diplomacy is top notch these days. "I hear statements from some American officials who claim that it is impossible to defeat Russia, because it is much larger and more powerful. They say that we need to give in to it, because pressure will not work. But at the same time, these same people are convincing Asian allies that if China attacks, the United States will be on their side. At the same time, China has a much more powerful economy and a larger army than Russia. If we are not able to put enough pressure on Moscow together to have a real effect, then how can we claim that we can defeat China?"

Lord Bebo

100,367 просмотров • 1 год назад

[Q]: Is Putin capable of launching a nuclear strike? Denys Shtilierman: Look, the most important thing in this war is to never think about the fact that Russia has nuclear weapons. If we think about that, we have already lost. We have to fight as if they do not have anything. Moreover, experience shows that China does not need this. And without China, Russia is simply incapable of waging any war. Nobody in the world needs this,” - Denys Shtilierman, co-founder and chief designer of Fire Point.
1:27

[Q]: Is Putin capable of launching a nuclear strike? Denys Shtilierman: Look, the most important thing in this war is to never think about the fact that Russia has nuclear weapons. If we think about that, we have already lost. We have to fight as if they do not have anything. Moreover, experience shows that China does not need this. And without China, Russia is simply incapable of waging any war. Nobody in the world needs this,” - Denys Shtilierman, co-founder and chief designer of Fire Point.

Anton Gerashchenko

35,893 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Yatsenyuk convinces Europeans that World War III has already begun, and the enemies of the West are Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran. ‘Look broader. It is not only Russia that is waging war. This is an international conflict. China provides vital support to Russia. China supports this war. China is an accomplice in this war. China is a key partner of North Korea, which has sent its troops against Ukraine and is providing assistance in this war against Ukraine. China is an ally of Iran. China, Russia, and other outcasts represent totalitarian regimes that are fighting against democracy and the free world. That is the definition of this conflict. It is not just a war between Ukraine and Russia. It is something much bigger.’ - SK
1:01

Yatsenyuk convinces Europeans that World War III has already begun, and the enemies of the West are Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran. ‘Look broader. It is not only Russia that is waging war. This is an international conflict. China provides vital support to Russia. China supports this war. China is an accomplice in this war. China is a key partner of North Korea, which has sent its troops against Ukraine and is providing assistance in this war against Ukraine. China is an ally of Iran. China, Russia, and other outcasts represent totalitarian regimes that are fighting against democracy and the free world. That is the definition of this conflict. It is not just a war between Ukraine and Russia. It is something much bigger.’ - SK

Zlatti71

46,405 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Iran’s FM Araghchi: "In our culture, apologizing is a sign of dignity and strength" If it is assumed that Iran has attacked its neighbors, that assumption is wrong; we have not attacked our neighbors. - We have targeted American bases and facilities that unfortunately are located in the territories of our neighboring countries. Therefore, we have not targeted our neighbors; we target the Americans who have attacked us. We are responding. We were not the ones who started the war; it was the United States that started the war against us, and we are simply defending ourselves. It is clear that our missiles do not reach American soil. What we can do is target American bases and facilities around us that unfortunately are located in the territories of neighboring countries. - First, in our culture, apologizing is a sign of dignity and strength. Second, he apologized to the people of the region for the problems caused as a result of the US aggression and our response. In fact, it is the President of the United States who should apologize to the people of the region and to the people of Iran for the killings and destruction they have caused.
1:42

Iran’s FM Araghchi: "In our culture, apologizing is a sign of dignity and strength" If it is assumed that Iran has attacked its neighbors, that assumption is wrong; we have not attacked our neighbors. - We have targeted American bases and facilities that unfortunately are located in the territories of our neighboring countries. Therefore, we have not targeted our neighbors; we target the Americans who have attacked us. We are responding. We were not the ones who started the war; it was the United States that started the war against us, and we are simply defending ourselves. It is clear that our missiles do not reach American soil. What we can do is target American bases and facilities around us that unfortunately are located in the territories of neighboring countries. - First, in our culture, apologizing is a sign of dignity and strength. Second, he apologized to the people of the region for the problems caused as a result of the US aggression and our response. In fact, it is the President of the United States who should apologize to the people of the region and to the people of Iran for the killings and destruction they have caused.

True Promise - الوعد الصادق ✪🇮🇷

19,518 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Seyed Mohammad Marandi replies to question about Russia and China's involvement in Iran. Glenn Diesen: "The American media as well as the European is full of accusations that Russia could be assisting Iran with intelligence with possible targeting. What do we know actually about China and Russia being involved?" Mohammad Marandi: "I don't know the details, but what I do know is that the Chinese and the Russians and the Iranians have moved closer to each other. This has been ongoing for years, but after the 12-day war, they've moved even closer. Iran has 15 neighbors. It's a large country. All the transit routes really have to go through Iran in Asia that would connect West Asia and East Asia, and the the Persian Gulf to to Europe and the Caucuses and Central Asia. So, the ability for Iran to receive weapons or anything that would help with the war is there. It could be done through its eastern borders. It can be done through its northern borders and there would be nothing that the United States could do about it. And the Chinese and the Russians can easily use these routes to trade with Iran, for Iran to send what what Iran purchases. I think it's clear as day that the the Russians do not want the United States to succeed in West Asia, and the Chinese obviously don't want it either. ...Zionist expansionism would basically mean further empowerment for the Trump regime and the United States, and they would have control over all the oil that are no longer leaving the Persian Gulf as we speak, but they would have control over everything and that would put China in a very very dangerous situation. More than dangerous. So, I think it's only natural to assume that the Chinese and the Russians are going to cooperate with Iran more. What the United States has done is that it has cemented the relationship between Russia, Iran and China for the years to come. They cemented it."
4:48

Seyed Mohammad Marandi replies to question about Russia and China's involvement in Iran. Glenn Diesen: "The American media as well as the European is full of accusations that Russia could be assisting Iran with intelligence with possible targeting. What do we know actually about China and Russia being involved?" Mohammad Marandi: "I don't know the details, but what I do know is that the Chinese and the Russians and the Iranians have moved closer to each other. This has been ongoing for years, but after the 12-day war, they've moved even closer. Iran has 15 neighbors. It's a large country. All the transit routes really have to go through Iran in Asia that would connect West Asia and East Asia, and the the Persian Gulf to to Europe and the Caucuses and Central Asia. So, the ability for Iran to receive weapons or anything that would help with the war is there. It could be done through its eastern borders. It can be done through its northern borders and there would be nothing that the United States could do about it. And the Chinese and the Russians can easily use these routes to trade with Iran, for Iran to send what what Iran purchases. I think it's clear as day that the the Russians do not want the United States to succeed in West Asia, and the Chinese obviously don't want it either. ...Zionist expansionism would basically mean further empowerment for the Trump regime and the United States, and they would have control over all the oil that are no longer leaving the Persian Gulf as we speak, but they would have control over everything and that would put China in a very very dangerous situation. More than dangerous. So, I think it's only natural to assume that the Chinese and the Russians are going to cooperate with Iran more. What the United States has done is that it has cemented the relationship between Russia, Iran and China for the years to come. They cemented it."

Eva Karene Bartlett

23,102 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Selective justice makes the rest of the world believe the United States is a hypocrite. It is easy to go after China, Russia or Modi or Israel in Gaza. But we don't because of positions we have taken and countries like China exploit that.
1:57

Selective justice makes the rest of the world believe the United States is a hypocrite. It is easy to go after China, Russia or Modi or Israel in Gaza. But we don't because of positions we have taken and countries like China exploit that.

Masu Zafi 🔥🔥

17,222 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

About 3 years ago, Russia received “shaheds” from the Iranian regime. These are drones designed for the low-cost destruction of the expensive critical infrastructure targets. Iran taught Russia how to launch them and gave it the technology to produce them. Russia then upgraded them. And now we have clear evidence that Iranian “shaheds” used in the region contain Russian components. So what is happening around Iran today is not a faraway war for us – because of the cooperation between Russia and Iran. And we do not believe we have the right to be indifferent – even if we are separated from human suffering or shared danger by an ocean, however big and beautiful, or by anything else. Ballistic missiles can strike at thousands of kilometers. Drones can do the same. But if evil wins, the evolution of war will cross any distance on earth – no ocean will help, no desert, no mountains. That is why it is worth helping protect life. The regimes in Russia and Iran are brothers in hatred – and that is why they are brothers in weapons. And we want regimes built on hatred to never win – in anything. From my address to the Parliament of the United Kingdom (2/7)
1:28

About 3 years ago, Russia received “shaheds” from the Iranian regime. These are drones designed for the low-cost destruction of the expensive critical infrastructure targets. Iran taught Russia how to launch them and gave it the technology to produce them. Russia then upgraded them. And now we have clear evidence that Iranian “shaheds” used in the region contain Russian components. So what is happening around Iran today is not a faraway war for us – because of the cooperation between Russia and Iran. And we do not believe we have the right to be indifferent – even if we are separated from human suffering or shared danger by an ocean, however big and beautiful, or by anything else. Ballistic missiles can strike at thousands of kilometers. Drones can do the same. But if evil wins, the evolution of war will cross any distance on earth – no ocean will help, no desert, no mountains. That is why it is worth helping protect life. The regimes in Russia and Iran are brothers in hatred – and that is why they are brothers in weapons. And we want regimes built on hatred to never win – in anything. From my address to the Parliament of the United Kingdom (2/7)

Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський

310,673 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The War Against BRICS Larry Johnson: The reason we want regime change in Iran is to stop BRICS, to stop the development of this alternative financial future that does not include the US—or at least doesn’t give the US the control where it can tell everybody what to do. And then if you don’t do what we tell you, we seize your money, we threaten, we make it impossible for you to do international trade. Those days are over and Iran now is seeing a way to break free of that. This is to destroy Iran and ultimately destroy Russia and China. That’s the US goal.
0:35

The War Against BRICS Larry Johnson: The reason we want regime change in Iran is to stop BRICS, to stop the development of this alternative financial future that does not include the US—or at least doesn’t give the US the control where it can tell everybody what to do. And then if you don’t do what we tell you, we seize your money, we threaten, we make it impossible for you to do international trade. Those days are over and Iran now is seeing a way to break free of that. This is to destroy Iran and ultimately destroy Russia and China. That’s the US goal.

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

57,528 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

To understand why Trump attacked Iran, you must understand CRINK - the new Axis Powers of China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea. By taking out Iran, Trump took even more oil from China that it MUST have. He also damaged Russia's drone manufacturing capabilities (Iran designs drones for Russia. Ukraine should be thankful). And that is just a fraction of Trump's full plan. China and Russia's BRICS alliance recently lost India, a key player, to Trump. And their two greatest allies in the West - Venezuela and Cuba - have either fallen or are nearing collapse. Iran is just the latest piece of the puzzle.
6:09

To understand why Trump attacked Iran, you must understand CRINK - the new Axis Powers of China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea. By taking out Iran, Trump took even more oil from China that it MUST have. He also damaged Russia's drone manufacturing capabilities (Iran designs drones for Russia. Ukraine should be thankful). And that is just a fraction of Trump's full plan. China and Russia's BRICS alliance recently lost India, a key player, to Trump. And their two greatest allies in the West - Venezuela and Cuba - have either fallen or are nearing collapse. Iran is just the latest piece of the puzzle.

Glenn Beck

1,294,449 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Baier: I just got off the phone with the president…. I asked, “what you are saying is you know there is somebody on the ground in Iran that is going to rise up?” He said, “yeah, I feel there is. I feel that and some of them are no longer with us to be honest because it was 49 leaders that were taken out. That was going to take four weeks we thought to get rid of the Iranian leadership and it is always, you know, if they hide, it is a lot longer than four weeks. They would have been hiding. We were shocked when we heard what was going on. We knew exactly what was happening… they are talking about using people now that nobody ever heard of—even they don't know. They are using people, studying people to be the leader that even they don't know who they are. Can you believe that?” I said it's a tough succession plan in Iran. He said, “49 leaders is deep. It's very deep. When they met, they met for breakfast. They assumed it was good for a lot of reasons. Number one they didn't think we knew. You never attack in the morning having to do with wind and sun and a lot of things. It was amazing that we knew everything we knew.”
1:48

Baier: I just got off the phone with the president…. I asked, “what you are saying is you know there is somebody on the ground in Iran that is going to rise up?” He said, “yeah, I feel there is. I feel that and some of them are no longer with us to be honest because it was 49 leaders that were taken out. That was going to take four weeks we thought to get rid of the Iranian leadership and it is always, you know, if they hide, it is a lot longer than four weeks. They would have been hiding. We were shocked when we heard what was going on. We knew exactly what was happening… they are talking about using people now that nobody ever heard of—even they don't know. They are using people, studying people to be the leader that even they don't know who they are. Can you believe that?” I said it's a tough succession plan in Iran. He said, “49 leaders is deep. It's very deep. When they met, they met for breakfast. They assumed it was good for a lot of reasons. Number one they didn't think we knew. You never attack in the morning having to do with wind and sun and a lot of things. It was amazing that we knew everything we knew.”

Acyn

1,065,464 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

The war of the United States and Israel against Iran is a war against Russia as well - Pro-Putin philosopher Alexander Dugin. "In fact, this is also a war against us [Russia] - that is what must be understood. We are next. And Iran right now is a shield - a Katechon. They have taken upon themselves a blow that was meant for all of us. And if they endure, it will be a tremendous success."
0:52

The war of the United States and Israel against Iran is a war against Russia as well - Pro-Putin philosopher Alexander Dugin. "In fact, this is also a war against us [Russia] - that is what must be understood. We are next. And Iran right now is a shield - a Katechon. They have taken upon themselves a blow that was meant for all of us. And if they endure, it will be a tremendous success."

Anton Gerashchenko

126,704 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Can Trump pull off a “reverse Kissinger” — and drive a wedge between Russia and the Chinese Communist Party? General Mike Flynn says yes. “If there’s one person that can do it, he can pull Russia out of that orbit. If we don't, then we have an alliance that's much more dangerous for the existence of the United States of America. And there are people in our government that want that, they want that tension, and we can't have it. I'm not an apologist. … I'm looking at the geo-strategic dynamics that are going on globally. And I'm watching closely what the Chinese are doing. … It is the death knell for Russia. Russia will just become a satellite of China."
1:56

Can Trump pull off a “reverse Kissinger” — and drive a wedge between Russia and the Chinese Communist Party? General Mike Flynn says yes. “If there’s one person that can do it, he can pull Russia out of that orbit. If we don't, then we have an alliance that's much more dangerous for the existence of the United States of America. And there are people in our government that want that, they want that tension, and we can't have it. I'm not an apologist. … I'm looking at the geo-strategic dynamics that are going on globally. And I'm watching closely what the Chinese are doing. … It is the death knell for Russia. Russia will just become a satellite of China."

Jan Jekielek

118,400 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

🚨💵Peter Schiff: Sanctions on Russia🇷🇺 marked the beginning of the end of the dollar as the world’s reserve currency “I was very critical at the time of the Biden sanctions against Russia, and I said that would come back to bite the US because I knew how critical the dollar’s reserve currency status was to propping up the US economy. I said that Biden just sent a very loud message, a warning to the world that they need to get rid of their dollars, that they could be the next Russia. If they do something that the United States doesn’t like, they’ve got that weapon. And so why would you want to enable the United States with a weapon to use against you? So I said this is going to result in a lot of selling of US dollars and US Treasuries. And that’s exactly what happened. The reason that gold is over $3300 an ounce is because central banks are getting rid of their dollars. And one of the reasons that the yield on US Treasuries just hit a new multi-year high and continues to rise is because we don’t have all the foreign buyers that Biden scared away. I think we’ve already established the precedent that the dollar is not sacrosanct. And if you’re a nation and you have US dollars, you have US Treasuries and you own them in good faith in that you would trust that they would be a reserve asset, a neutral reserve asset. We’ve already established a precedent that that’s not the case, that we can yank the rug out from under you whenever we want. So I think regardless of what Trump does now, if I was in China or any of these countries, especially China, because, you know, we vilify China, we say China’s our enemy. Okay, well, if China’s our enemy, why the hell do they want to leave themselves vulnerable by owning all of our bonds? And it’s not just Treasuries that they own. They own mortgage-backed securities. They have a tremendous amount of dollar-denominated assets, so I would be completely divesting as quickly as I could.” -Peter Schiff on Going Underground
2:35

🚨💵Peter Schiff: Sanctions on Russia🇷🇺 marked the beginning of the end of the dollar as the world’s reserve currency “I was very critical at the time of the Biden sanctions against Russia, and I said that would come back to bite the US because I knew how critical the dollar’s reserve currency status was to propping up the US economy. I said that Biden just sent a very loud message, a warning to the world that they need to get rid of their dollars, that they could be the next Russia. If they do something that the United States doesn’t like, they’ve got that weapon. And so why would you want to enable the United States with a weapon to use against you? So I said this is going to result in a lot of selling of US dollars and US Treasuries. And that’s exactly what happened. The reason that gold is over $3300 an ounce is because central banks are getting rid of their dollars. And one of the reasons that the yield on US Treasuries just hit a new multi-year high and continues to rise is because we don’t have all the foreign buyers that Biden scared away. I think we’ve already established the precedent that the dollar is not sacrosanct. And if you’re a nation and you have US dollars, you have US Treasuries and you own them in good faith in that you would trust that they would be a reserve asset, a neutral reserve asset. We’ve already established a precedent that that’s not the case, that we can yank the rug out from under you whenever we want. So I think regardless of what Trump does now, if I was in China or any of these countries, especially China, because, you know, we vilify China, we say China’s our enemy. Okay, well, if China’s our enemy, why the hell do they want to leave themselves vulnerable by owning all of our bonds? And it’s not just Treasuries that they own. They own mortgage-backed securities. They have a tremendous amount of dollar-denominated assets, so I would be completely divesting as quickly as I could.” -Peter Schiff on Going Underground

Going Underground

16,526 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Zelensky on Russia: "We see that they don't have successful steps on the battlefield, and it's good. I think that their army is weak now. They have a lot of losses in the economy and people."
0:23

Zelensky on Russia: "We see that they don't have successful steps on the battlefield, and it's good. I think that their army is weak now. They have a lot of losses in the economy and people."

Visegrád 24

54,334 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: "China🇨🇳 was supposed to develop in a way that is subservient to the United States🇺🇸 (they didn’t)…now they have to be punished.” A reminder as Trump visits China that the entire US’ mounting pressure against Beijing for a coming war is because not only did China develop in a way that wasn’t subservient to Washington, like Japan… But China also built a better economic system, which is obvious to Americans and the rest of the world. The US wants to weaken China to stop Americans asking ‘why can’t we live like that?’ or ‘why can we not have that infrastructure here?’
1:17

Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: "China🇨🇳 was supposed to develop in a way that is subservient to the United States🇺🇸 (they didn’t)…now they have to be punished.” A reminder as Trump visits China that the entire US’ mounting pressure against Beijing for a coming war is because not only did China develop in a way that wasn’t subservient to Washington, like Japan… But China also built a better economic system, which is obvious to Americans and the rest of the world. The US wants to weaken China to stop Americans asking ‘why can’t we live like that?’ or ‘why can we not have that infrastructure here?’

Afshin Rattansi

124,826 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

NBC’s Gabe Gutierrez: “One on Iran and one on Cuba. Is Iran now bigger foreign policy priority for you than China and on Cuba — the Cuban government —” President Trump: “Iran is just a military operation. To me, Iran is something that was essentially largely over in two or three days because the Navy was wiped out almost immediately. The air force came next, the anti-aircraft came next. I mean, we're flying over Iran. We could take out their electric capacity in one hour. We have all the there's nothing they can do right now because everything is knocked out. They have no — again, no radar, no anti-aircraft. They have nothing, and we don't — and it was a decision I made. We discussed it. Pete, Marco, JD all of us, Chris. We discussed it. We can knock out their electricity in a matter of minutes if we wanted to. There's nothing they can do about it. We can knock out their oil in Kharg Island. The only thing we didn't take down was the oil. Because if we knock out, I call them the pipes. Very complex. But if you do that, it will take them forever to rebuild, meaning whoever — and hopefully it's a sane group of people, but whoever it is, it's going to be running that, and we're going to try to get people that are going to run it well. And you know, it's going to be a prosperous, wonderful place. It used to be, you know, if you go back, it used to be a very — the people are great. The people are smart and energetic and it used to be very successful. Now, it's a country run by fear. It's a country where they tell protesters, don't go outside, because if you do, we're going to kill you....Well, Cuba right now is in very bad shape. They're talking to Marco, and we'll be doing something with Cuba very soon. We're really focused on this, but we're dealing with Cuba. Marco, do you want to say a couple of words about it?” Secretary of State Rubio: “Yeah. I mean, Cuba has an economy that doesn't work and a political and governmental system. They can't fix it. It's not dramatic enough. It's not going to fix it, so they've got some big decisions to make over there.” Gutierrez: “But Secretary — Secretary Rubio, do you support and I know this is up to Congress, but do you support easing the Cuban trade embargo if you get more cooperation from Havana?” Rubio: “Well, I'm not going to discuss what we would talk about or not. Suffice it to say that the embargo is tied to political change on the island. The law has been the embargo is codified. And — but the bottom line is their economy doesn't work. It's a nonfunctional economy. It's an economy that has survived. It's for 40 — that revolution — it's not even a revolution, that thing they have — has survived on subsidies from the Soviet Union and now from Venezuela. They don't get subsidies anymore, so they're in a lot of trouble. And the people in charge are — they don't know how to fix it, so they have to get new people in charge. That's what happened.” Trump: “And the relationship we have with Venezuela has been, I think you could almost say, incredible. It's been really good. It's been good for Venezuela and it's been good for us. And I congratulate the Venezuelan baseball team because that was a big — that was a big win. And I guess they play another game tonight in the finals.” Rubio: “Against the U.S.” Trump: “And I said a lot of good things have happened to Venezuela lately. This is the first time they've ever been in the finals, and it was pretty exciting.
3:27

NBC’s Gabe Gutierrez: “One on Iran and one on Cuba. Is Iran now bigger foreign policy priority for you than China and on Cuba — the Cuban government —” President Trump: “Iran is just a military operation. To me, Iran is something that was essentially largely over in two or three days because the Navy was wiped out almost immediately. The air force came next, the anti-aircraft came next. I mean, we're flying over Iran. We could take out their electric capacity in one hour. We have all the there's nothing they can do right now because everything is knocked out. They have no — again, no radar, no anti-aircraft. They have nothing, and we don't — and it was a decision I made. We discussed it. Pete, Marco, JD all of us, Chris. We discussed it. We can knock out their electricity in a matter of minutes if we wanted to. There's nothing they can do about it. We can knock out their oil in Kharg Island. The only thing we didn't take down was the oil. Because if we knock out, I call them the pipes. Very complex. But if you do that, it will take them forever to rebuild, meaning whoever — and hopefully it's a sane group of people, but whoever it is, it's going to be running that, and we're going to try to get people that are going to run it well. And you know, it's going to be a prosperous, wonderful place. It used to be, you know, if you go back, it used to be a very — the people are great. The people are smart and energetic and it used to be very successful. Now, it's a country run by fear. It's a country where they tell protesters, don't go outside, because if you do, we're going to kill you....Well, Cuba right now is in very bad shape. They're talking to Marco, and we'll be doing something with Cuba very soon. We're really focused on this, but we're dealing with Cuba. Marco, do you want to say a couple of words about it?” Secretary of State Rubio: “Yeah. I mean, Cuba has an economy that doesn't work and a political and governmental system. They can't fix it. It's not dramatic enough. It's not going to fix it, so they've got some big decisions to make over there.” Gutierrez: “But Secretary — Secretary Rubio, do you support and I know this is up to Congress, but do you support easing the Cuban trade embargo if you get more cooperation from Havana?” Rubio: “Well, I'm not going to discuss what we would talk about or not. Suffice it to say that the embargo is tied to political change on the island. The law has been the embargo is codified. And — but the bottom line is their economy doesn't work. It's a nonfunctional economy. It's an economy that has survived. It's for 40 — that revolution — it's not even a revolution, that thing they have — has survived on subsidies from the Soviet Union and now from Venezuela. They don't get subsidies anymore, so they're in a lot of trouble. And the people in charge are — they don't know how to fix it, so they have to get new people in charge. That's what happened.” Trump: “And the relationship we have with Venezuela has been, I think you could almost say, incredible. It's been really good. It's been good for Venezuela and it's been good for us. And I congratulate the Venezuelan baseball team because that was a big — that was a big win. And I guess they play another game tonight in the finals.” Rubio: “Against the U.S.” Trump: “And I said a lot of good things have happened to Venezuela lately. This is the first time they've ever been in the finals, and it was pretty exciting.

Curtis Houck

175,437 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Jensen Huang just told every AI leader in the room to grow up. Stop scaring the public with science fiction. Start communicating like the weight of civilization is on your shoulders. Because it is. Huang: “AI is not a biological being. It is not alien. It is not conscious. It is computer software.” That single statement dismantles half the panic surrounding this industry. The mainstream conversation is dominated by people projecting human malice onto math. Alien consciousness onto code. Existential dread onto a software architecture we built, we trained, and we can read. Huang: “We say things like, ‘We don’t understand it at all.’ It is not true. We understand a lot of things about this technology.” When builders tell the public they don’t understand their own creation, the public hears threat. The state responds with control. That is already happening. Palihapitiya asked Huang what he would have told Anthropic during their regulatory clash with the Department of Defense. Huang didn’t attack the technology. He attacked the communication. Huang: “The desire to warn people about the capability of the technology is really terrific. We just have to make sure that we understand that the world has a spectrum, and that warning is good, scaring is less good because this technology is too important to us.” Warning shows risks, mitigation, why upside overwhelms downside. Scaring says we might be building something that destroys us and we can’t stop it. One builds trust. The other invites regulation written in panic. Huang: “To say things that are quite extreme, quite catastrophic, that there’s no evidence of it happening, could be more damaging than people think.” Projecting catastrophe without evidence is not caution. It is sabotage. When your technology is embedded in national defense, the financial system, and healthcare infrastructure, your words carry structural weight. If the architects act terrified of their own product, the response is predictable. Governments step in. They restrict. They seize control of something they don’t understand because the builders told them to be afraid. Huang: “There was a time when nobody listened to us, but now because technology is so important in the social fabric, such an important industry, so important to national security, our words do matter.” Most tech founders have not internalized this. You are no longer a startup founder disrupting an industry. You are running infrastructure that nations depend on. Your statements move policy. Your framing shapes legislation. Your tone determines whether governments treat you as partner or threat. Huang: “We have to be much more circumspect, we have to be more moderate, we have to be more balanced, we have to be far more thoughtful.” Huang did not ask for silence. He asked for precision. The leaders who cannot tell the difference will not be leading for long.
1:27

Jensen Huang just told every AI leader in the room to grow up. Stop scaring the public with science fiction. Start communicating like the weight of civilization is on your shoulders. Because it is. Huang: “AI is not a biological being. It is not alien. It is not conscious. It is computer software.” That single statement dismantles half the panic surrounding this industry. The mainstream conversation is dominated by people projecting human malice onto math. Alien consciousness onto code. Existential dread onto a software architecture we built, we trained, and we can read. Huang: “We say things like, ‘We don’t understand it at all.’ It is not true. We understand a lot of things about this technology.” When builders tell the public they don’t understand their own creation, the public hears threat. The state responds with control. That is already happening. Palihapitiya asked Huang what he would have told Anthropic during their regulatory clash with the Department of Defense. Huang didn’t attack the technology. He attacked the communication. Huang: “The desire to warn people about the capability of the technology is really terrific. We just have to make sure that we understand that the world has a spectrum, and that warning is good, scaring is less good because this technology is too important to us.” Warning shows risks, mitigation, why upside overwhelms downside. Scaring says we might be building something that destroys us and we can’t stop it. One builds trust. The other invites regulation written in panic. Huang: “To say things that are quite extreme, quite catastrophic, that there’s no evidence of it happening, could be more damaging than people think.” Projecting catastrophe without evidence is not caution. It is sabotage. When your technology is embedded in national defense, the financial system, and healthcare infrastructure, your words carry structural weight. If the architects act terrified of their own product, the response is predictable. Governments step in. They restrict. They seize control of something they don’t understand because the builders told them to be afraid. Huang: “There was a time when nobody listened to us, but now because technology is so important in the social fabric, such an important industry, so important to national security, our words do matter.” Most tech founders have not internalized this. You are no longer a startup founder disrupting an industry. You are running infrastructure that nations depend on. Your statements move policy. Your framing shapes legislation. Your tone determines whether governments treat you as partner or threat. Huang: “We have to be much more circumspect, we have to be more moderate, we have to be more balanced, we have to be far more thoughtful.” Huang did not ask for silence. He asked for precision. The leaders who cannot tell the difference will not be leading for long.

Dustin

160,166 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

BANNON: Are you saying if we don’t get out of Ukraine and get out now, it’s over, the deep state wins? RICKARDS: Yes, bc everything revolves around relations with Russia. China is supporting Russia. It should be the US and Russia against China. That is how you play a three handed poker game, 2 against 1. But right now it is China and Russia against us. You solve Ukraine, you can have rapprochement with Russia. You can solve Iran. It is the single most important thing Trump is doing.
0:44

BANNON: Are you saying if we don’t get out of Ukraine and get out now, it’s over, the deep state wins? RICKARDS: Yes, bc everything revolves around relations with Russia. China is supporting Russia. It should be the US and Russia against China. That is how you play a three handed poker game, 2 against 1. But right now it is China and Russia against us. You solve Ukraine, you can have rapprochement with Russia. You can solve Iran. It is the single most important thing Trump is doing.

Grace Chong, MBI

56,330 просмотров • 1 год назад