Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Mike Johnson: "This is not a regime change. This is a demand for change in behavior by a regime ... we have a way of persuasion because their oil exports have been seized. That will bring the country to a new governance in very short order. We don't expect... show more

Aaron Rupar

1,064,051 subscribers

54,441 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Asked Speaker Johnson about Trump’s plans to run VZ and how much it will cost US in terms of taxpayer dollars and troops. He said US will not occupy VZ “This is not a regime change. This is a demand for change of behavior by a regime. .. We don’t expect troops on the ground.”

Asked Speaker Johnson about Trump’s plans to run VZ and how much it will cost US in terms of taxpayer dollars and troops. He said US will not occupy VZ “This is not a regime change. This is a demand for change of behavior by a regime. .. We don’t expect troops on the ground.”

Manu Raju

151,841 views • 7 months ago

.Speaker Mike Johnson: This is not a regime change, this is a demand for a change of behavior. They cannot participate in narcoterrorist and dangerous international criminal organizations that harm and target Americans and traffic drugs into our country.

.Speaker Mike Johnson: This is not a regime change, this is a demand for a change of behavior. They cannot participate in narcoterrorist and dangerous international criminal organizations that harm and target Americans and traffic drugs into our country.

Rapid Response 47

92,393 views • 7 months ago

VASSY: You have a position on the regime. Do you have a position on the actions launched by the US and Israel? LANTSMAN: We supported those actions in order to have regime change V: But the regime change hasn't occurred L: We supported those actions in light of a potential regime change

VASSY: You have a position on the regime. Do you have a position on the actions launched by the US and Israel? LANTSMAN: We supported those actions in order to have regime change V: But the regime change hasn't occurred L: We supported those actions in light of a potential regime change

Scott Robertson

30,913 views • 4 months ago

Trump: We killed all their leadership. And then they met to choose new leaders, and we killed all of them. We have really... regime change, you know, this is a change in the regime, because the leaders are all very different than the ones that we started off with. I think we can say this is regime change, right?

Trump: We killed all their leadership. And then they met to choose new leaders, and we killed all of them. We have really... regime change, you know, this is a change in the regime, because the leaders are all very different than the ones that we started off with. I think we can say this is regime change, right?

Headquarters

51,062 views • 4 months ago

Pres. Trump, in a remarkable rambling session, says he basically succeeded at enacting regime change in Iran because the "regime changed." "This is a change in the regime because the leaders are all very different than the ones that we started off with..."

Pres. Trump, in a remarkable rambling session, says he basically succeeded at enacting regime change in Iran because the "regime changed." "This is a change in the regime because the leaders are all very different than the ones that we started off with..."

Chris Menahan 🇺🇸

66,604 views • 4 months ago

JD Vance 9 months before the Trump administration launched a new regime change war: " Our view has been very clear that we don't want a regime change. We do not want to protract this or build this out any more than it's already been built out."

JD Vance 9 months before the Trump administration launched a new regime change war: " Our view has been very clear that we don't want a regime change. We do not want to protract this or build this out any more than it's already been built out."

Home of the Brave

22,089 views • 5 months ago

Jeffries: He’s been a failure. Republicans have been a failure. And to the extent that we need regime change at this moment, it is going to come in November.

Jeffries: He’s been a failure. Republicans have been a failure. And to the extent that we need regime change at this moment, it is going to come in November.

Acyn

42,303 views • 4 months ago

🇺🇸🇬🇱🇻🇪 SPEAKER JOHNSON: "WE'RE NOT AT WAR WITH GREENLAND - THERE'S NOT A REGIME CHANGE IN VENEZUELA" Speaker Mike Johnson was asked if Congress needs to approve military action in Greenland or control over oil in Venezuela. His answer made one thing clear: things are moving fast, and even Congress is struggling to keep up. He said there’s no war with Greenland and no reason to expect one, despite Trump floating ideas about its strategic value. On Venezuela, Johnson admitted Congress hasn’t been fully briefed yet but confirmed that U.S. oil companies will be involved in rebuilding the country’s energy infrastructure. "We’re not at war with Greenland. We have no intention of being. They’re talking about diplomatic channels for this. We have to see what plays out with regard to Venezuela. I’m told the American oil companies will be involved in getting that infrastructure back up. This is not a regime change. It is a change of the actions of the regime." Source: Aaron Rupar, Mike Johnson

🇺🇸🇬🇱🇻🇪 SPEAKER JOHNSON: "WE'RE NOT AT WAR WITH GREENLAND - THERE'S NOT A REGIME CHANGE IN VENEZUELA" Speaker Mike Johnson was asked if Congress needs to approve military action in Greenland or control over oil in Venezuela. His answer made one thing clear: things are moving fast, and even Congress is struggling to keep up. He said there’s no war with Greenland and no reason to expect one, despite Trump floating ideas about its strategic value. On Venezuela, Johnson admitted Congress hasn’t been fully briefed yet but confirmed that U.S. oil companies will be involved in rebuilding the country’s energy infrastructure. "We’re not at war with Greenland. We have no intention of being. They’re talking about diplomatic channels for this. We have to see what plays out with regard to Venezuela. I’m told the American oil companies will be involved in getting that infrastructure back up. This is not a regime change. It is a change of the actions of the regime." Source: Aaron Rupar, Mike Johnson

Mario Nawfal

25,898 views • 7 months ago

JD Vance said today on Iran “Our view has been very clear that we don't want a regime change.” Hegseth: "This mission was not and has not been about regime change." Trump: We're going to make regime change great again!

JD Vance said today on Iran “Our view has been very clear that we don't want a regime change.” Hegseth: "This mission was not and has not been about regime change." Trump: We're going to make regime change great again!

Fly Sistah 🪷

206,084 views • 1 year ago

GEN. MIKE FLYNN: “This war is going to go on in the Middle East for at least another two weeks. You’re going to see a level of devastation that we have not seen probably since WWII. This is regime change time.” General Mike Flynn

GEN. MIKE FLYNN: “This war is going to go on in the Middle East for at least another two weeks. You’re going to see a level of devastation that we have not seen probably since WWII. This is regime change time.” General Mike Flynn

Bannon’s WarRoom

314,156 views • 1 year ago

⚡️🇺🇸JUST IN: White House says a regime change happened in Iran. Reporter: The President yesterday said that he had achieved regime change in Iran because the regime has changed in terms… Leavitt: I mean has it not? Their entire leadership has been killed, and nobody has really seen or legitimately heard from this alleged new leader. So wouldn't you say there's been a change in the regime? Reporter: There's been a change in leadership. Leavitt: There's been a change in the regime leadership, which is what the President said. So thank you for confirming he is right

⚡️🇺🇸JUST IN: White House says a regime change happened in Iran. Reporter: The President yesterday said that he had achieved regime change in Iran because the regime has changed in terms… Leavitt: I mean has it not? Their entire leadership has been killed, and nobody has really seen or legitimately heard from this alleged new leader. So wouldn't you say there's been a change in the regime? Reporter: There's been a change in leadership. Leavitt: There's been a change in the regime leadership, which is what the President said. So thank you for confirming he is right

Suppressed News.

75,893 views • 4 months ago

Trump has made it clear. This is a regime change mission. But you don't achieve regime change by replacing Khamenei with another ayatollah. In order for regime change to happen, the entire structure of the ayatollahs and the Revolutionary Guard must be swept away.

Trump has made it clear. This is a regime change mission. But you don't achieve regime change by replacing Khamenei with another ayatollah. In order for regime change to happen, the entire structure of the ayatollahs and the Revolutionary Guard must be swept away.

John Bolton

252,090 views • 5 months ago

Venezuelan Political Scientist Jesus Rodriguez: The kidnapping of President Maduro does not mean regime change in Venezuela. It is going to be hard for the U.S. to really provoke a regime change in Venezuela. If you understand regime change simply as changing the president, they have forced that situation, but the movement remains. There is a possibility they will try to negotiate or avoid more escalation if Delcy Rodriguez is in power; that is a scenario we have to see.

Venezuelan Political Scientist Jesus Rodriguez: The kidnapping of President Maduro does not mean regime change in Venezuela. It is going to be hard for the U.S. to really provoke a regime change in Venezuela. If you understand regime change simply as changing the president, they have forced that situation, but the movement remains. There is a possibility they will try to negotiate or avoid more escalation if Delcy Rodriguez is in power; that is a scenario we have to see.

Clash Report

25,451 views • 7 months ago

Hogg: This is a country that's entire history has been defined by outsiders especially from the west, coming in and forcing regime change. Jennings: They’ve been the same regime for 50 years. Hogg: And you know why we got to this place? It's because of a CIA backed coup Downey: It’s because of Biden…

Hogg: This is a country that's entire history has been defined by outsiders especially from the west, coming in and forcing regime change. Jennings: They’ve been the same regime for 50 years. Hogg: And you know why we got to this place? It's because of a CIA backed coup Downey: It’s because of Biden…

Acyn

161,604 views • 3 months ago

Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich on Iran: We must bring down this regime, because we cannot allow the very existence of such a radical regime that seeks our destruction and possesses these kinds of capabilities. And we will continue to do this in our own way. Again, we will stand our ground.

Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich on Iran: We must bring down this regime, because we cannot allow the very existence of such a radical regime that seeks our destruction and possesses these kinds of capabilities. And we will continue to do this in our own way. Again, we will stand our ground.

Clash Report

21,382 views • 1 month ago

Mockler: First of all, we have to do a cost benefit analysis on this and talk about what the timelines from here look like. So there's one timeline in which we go boots on the ground or try to actually go for the nuclear capacities or try to do regime change via boots on the ground. That is catastrophic due to the geography of Iran. It is surrounded by mountains. They have a bunch of people in the irgc who are very radicalized. There's also another path, another timeline, where we go for an off ramp and we start to back up. In that timeline, we are left with a regime that is more radicalized. So those are the two timelines. I don't care if we have some short term wins. The cost benefit analysis of this war does not make sense. We are losing troops, losing lives, losing money for two timelines are going to make the world more dangerous.

Mockler: First of all, we have to do a cost benefit analysis on this and talk about what the timelines from here look like. So there's one timeline in which we go boots on the ground or try to actually go for the nuclear capacities or try to do regime change via boots on the ground. That is catastrophic due to the geography of Iran. It is surrounded by mountains. They have a bunch of people in the irgc who are very radicalized. There's also another path, another timeline, where we go for an off ramp and we start to back up. In that timeline, we are left with a regime that is more radicalized. So those are the two timelines. I don't care if we have some short term wins. The cost benefit analysis of this war does not make sense. We are losing troops, losing lives, losing money for two timelines are going to make the world more dangerous.

Acyn

54,476 views • 4 months ago

Rep. Tim Burchett is a NO on America participating in a regime change in Iran: "We just don‘t have a good record with regime change. We put somebody in and it doesn‘t seem to always work out for us."

Rep. Tim Burchett is a NO on America participating in a regime change in Iran: "We just don‘t have a good record with regime change. We put somebody in and it doesn‘t seem to always work out for us."

Gunther Eagleman™

18,570 views • 1 year ago

Reporter: The president yesterday said that he had achieved regime change in Iran because the regime has changed. Leavitt: Has it not? Wouldn’t you say there has been a change in the regime? Reporter: There’s been a change in leadership Leavitt: Thank you for confirming he is right.

Reporter: The president yesterday said that he had achieved regime change in Iran because the regime has changed. Leavitt: Has it not? Wouldn’t you say there has been a change in the regime? Reporter: There’s been a change in leadership Leavitt: Thank you for confirming he is right.

Acyn

747,990 views • 4 months ago

Rep. Sara Jacobs responds to claims Trump is “ending the forever war,” pointing to the 1953 U.S.-backed coup in Iran and warning that regime change can lead to “a more hardline regime, a security vacuum, potentially civil war.” “It started in large part because the United States went into Iran and did a regime change operation… We don't know what actually is going to happen after we do these kinds of regime change operations. You're likely to get a more hardline regime, a security vacuum, potentially civil war… The idea that this is ending a forever war… when it is, in fact, starting another one… is kind of preposterous.”

Rep. Sara Jacobs responds to claims Trump is “ending the forever war,” pointing to the 1953 U.S.-backed coup in Iran and warning that regime change can lead to “a more hardline regime, a security vacuum, potentially civil war.” “It started in large part because the United States went into Iran and did a regime change operation… We don't know what actually is going to happen after we do these kinds of regime change operations. You're likely to get a more hardline regime, a security vacuum, potentially civil war… The idea that this is ending a forever war… when it is, in fact, starting another one… is kind of preposterous.”

HalalFlow

20,380 views • 5 months ago

Moulton: "When we had briefings on Venezuela, we asked, 'Are you going to invade the country?' We were told no. 'Do you plan to put troops on the ground in Venezuela?' We were told no. 'Do you intend regime change in Venezuela?' We were told no. So in a sense, we have been briefed, we have just been completely lied to."

Moulton: "When we had briefings on Venezuela, we asked, 'Are you going to invade the country?' We were told no. 'Do you plan to put troops on the ground in Venezuela?' We were told no. 'Do you intend regime change in Venezuela?' We were told no. So in a sense, we have been briefed, we have just been completely lied to."

Aaron Rupar

497,100 views • 7 months ago