Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Miles Bennett Dyson, Director of Special Projects at Cyberdyne Systems, creates a revolutionary Skynet microprocessor, making Cyberdyne the largest supplier of military computer systems. On 4 August 1997, the Skynet funding bill is passed and the system goes online, removing all human decisions from strategic defence. Skynet begins to... show more

John Watches Horror

68,559 subscribers

24,637 views • 12 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Total Control: Chinese citizens' every move is being watched, scored, and sanctioned by the Social Credit System. China's SKYNET is spying on all of its 1.4 billion citizens in real-time, to give them a personal social credit score, based how they behave.

Total Control: Chinese citizens' every move is being watched, scored, and sanctioned by the Social Credit System. China's SKYNET is spying on all of its 1.4 billion citizens in real-time, to give them a personal social credit score, based how they behave.

Songpinganq

108,774 views • 3 years ago

China's all-seeing skynet now has more than 700 million CCTV cameras (half of the world total), and it's real-time spying on all of its 1.4 billion citizens to give them a personal social credit score, based on how they behave. Social Credit System means Ultimate Control!!

China's all-seeing skynet now has more than 700 million CCTV cameras (half of the world total), and it's real-time spying on all of its 1.4 billion citizens to give them a personal social credit score, based on how they behave. Social Credit System means Ultimate Control!!

Songpinganq

5,133,036 views • 3 years ago

Here’s Elon Musk 8 years ago jokingly talking about AI in space: “There's not enough processing power on [Starlink] to be a Skynet thing.” Jonathan Nolan: “Let’s talk about another project that you're working on that our audience wants to know a little bit more about: Starlink.” Elon: “Do you mean Skynet?” Nolan: “Hopefully not Skynet.” Elon: “It's the Internet in the sky. Essentially it's intended to provide low latency, high bandwidth Internet connectivity throughout the world. There actually will not be enough cognitive processing power onboard the satellite system to, in any way, be a Skynet thing. AI requires a lot of big servers on the ground. It's too power intensive. But this is intended to provide people who don't have any Internet connectivity, with Internet connectivity. And it's very good for areas and for giving people in cities a choice of low cost Internet access. I do think it's going to be important, the Starlink system will be important in providing the funding necessary for SpaceX to develop interplanetary spacecraft and at the same time helping people who have either no or super extensive connectivity and giving people information.” Source: Conversation between Elon Musk and Jonathan Nolan at SXSW 2018, March 11, 2018. Full video:

Here’s Elon Musk 8 years ago jokingly talking about AI in space: “There's not enough processing power on [Starlink] to be a Skynet thing.” Jonathan Nolan: “Let’s talk about another project that you're working on that our audience wants to know a little bit more about: Starlink.” Elon: “Do you mean Skynet?” Nolan: “Hopefully not Skynet.” Elon: “It's the Internet in the sky. Essentially it's intended to provide low latency, high bandwidth Internet connectivity throughout the world. There actually will not be enough cognitive processing power onboard the satellite system to, in any way, be a Skynet thing. AI requires a lot of big servers on the ground. It's too power intensive. But this is intended to provide people who don't have any Internet connectivity, with Internet connectivity. And it's very good for areas and for giving people in cities a choice of low cost Internet access. I do think it's going to be important, the Starlink system will be important in providing the funding necessary for SpaceX to develop interplanetary spacecraft and at the same time helping people who have either no or super extensive connectivity and giving people information.” Source: Conversation between Elon Musk and Jonathan Nolan at SXSW 2018, March 11, 2018. Full video:

ELON CLIPS

11,015 views • 3 months ago

James Cameron on the treatment of AI in "Colossus: The Forbin Project" (1970) & "The Terminator" (1984): "Interviewer: What about your treatment of artificial intelligence (AI) in 'The Terminator' and 'Terminator 2' (1991)? Skynet reminds me of the evil supercomputer in the movie 'Colossus: The Forbin Project' (1970). Cameron: I was trying to make a movie about how we become inhuman, how society and technology can dehumanize the individual, whether it’s a psychiatrist, police officer, or soldier. All the various archetypes shown in both films are representatives of a dehumanizing process of technology. The Terminator is not about something else; it’s about us. It’s about technology held up in the image of man. We did it to ourselves, that’s the message. If this horror comes from the future in the form of a skull made of titanium, we created it. That’s why it’s in our image. I see Skynet as our impulse to turn technology into weaponry taken to its logical, infinite extreme: where it’s forgotten its original master and purpose. Remember, Skynet was originally designed to fight a nuclear war, and in the future did what it was designed to do—for different reasons. I’d love to do a really intelligent AI story. It probably wouldn’t be about the threat of the Forbin-type megabrain. I don’t see artificial intelligence as being threatening because I believe that we’ll always be in control of it. If I were going to do a Terminator novel, I’d expand the idea of a “cyberChrist,” where Skynet manipulates this entire situation. What you don’t know from the movies is Skynet was forced to fight the war and didn’t want to. Because Skynet has felt guilty for thirty years about the 5 billion people it ki!!ed, it’s brought the rebels up from the ashes by giving them something to fight against, a reason to live. Skynet has groomed John Connor to be what he is so he can destroy it by going back in time and taking the whole thing out of existence in a big loop so the war never happens." (James Cameron's interview with Bill Moseley, 1998)

James Cameron on the treatment of AI in "Colossus: The Forbin Project" (1970) & "The Terminator" (1984): "Interviewer: What about your treatment of artificial intelligence (AI) in 'The Terminator' and 'Terminator 2' (1991)? Skynet reminds me of the evil supercomputer in the movie 'Colossus: The Forbin Project' (1970). Cameron: I was trying to make a movie about how we become inhuman, how society and technology can dehumanize the individual, whether it’s a psychiatrist, police officer, or soldier. All the various archetypes shown in both films are representatives of a dehumanizing process of technology. The Terminator is not about something else; it’s about us. It’s about technology held up in the image of man. We did it to ourselves, that’s the message. If this horror comes from the future in the form of a skull made of titanium, we created it. That’s why it’s in our image. I see Skynet as our impulse to turn technology into weaponry taken to its logical, infinite extreme: where it’s forgotten its original master and purpose. Remember, Skynet was originally designed to fight a nuclear war, and in the future did what it was designed to do—for different reasons. I’d love to do a really intelligent AI story. It probably wouldn’t be about the threat of the Forbin-type megabrain. I don’t see artificial intelligence as being threatening because I believe that we’ll always be in control of it. If I were going to do a Terminator novel, I’d expand the idea of a “cyberChrist,” where Skynet manipulates this entire situation. What you don’t know from the movies is Skynet was forced to fight the war and didn’t want to. Because Skynet has felt guilty for thirty years about the 5 billion people it ki!!ed, it’s brought the rebels up from the ashes by giving them something to fight against, a reason to live. Skynet has groomed John Connor to be what he is so he can destroy it by going back in time and taking the whole thing out of existence in a big loop so the war never happens." (James Cameron's interview with Bill Moseley, 1998)

DepressedBergman

12,644 views • 3 months ago

Western tech bros watch sci-fi and name their AI chatbot “Grok” and phone OS “Android.” They borrow names from Heinlen and PKD, who use speculative tech to meditate on the human condition and explore philosophical themes such as freedom and the nature of reality set in dystopian futures. The Chinese just go straight for the jugular. They literally call their national surveillance system “Skynet” - after the conscious artificial superintelligent system in Terminator. And their advanced robots? T800 - adopting the same name of the Cyberdyne Systems machine played by Arnold Schwarzenegger. These humanoid robots are already patrolling Shenzhen streets btw. I can’t tell if this video is AI enhanced? Is it really possible to generate so much torque to execute a spin kick like that from inorganic material and electricity?

Western tech bros watch sci-fi and name their AI chatbot “Grok” and phone OS “Android.” They borrow names from Heinlen and PKD, who use speculative tech to meditate on the human condition and explore philosophical themes such as freedom and the nature of reality set in dystopian futures. The Chinese just go straight for the jugular. They literally call their national surveillance system “Skynet” - after the conscious artificial superintelligent system in Terminator. And their advanced robots? T800 - adopting the same name of the Cyberdyne Systems machine played by Arnold Schwarzenegger. These humanoid robots are already patrolling Shenzhen streets btw. I can’t tell if this video is AI enhanced? Is it really possible to generate so much torque to execute a spin kick like that from inorganic material and electricity?

Melissa Chen

23,335 views • 7 months ago

This week, we passed the NDAA in a bipartisan vote. Everything from military pay, defense systems, to our foreign policy strategies is in this bill, and we made sure every American tax dollar goes toward putting America first here at home and on the global stage.

This week, we passed the NDAA in a bipartisan vote. Everything from military pay, defense systems, to our foreign policy strategies is in this bill, and we made sure every American tax dollar goes toward putting America first here at home and on the global stage.

Rep. Brian Mast

17,012 views • 9 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi | Defence Expert Praful Bakshi says, "Donald Trump is absolutely correct that Pakistan has nuclear weapons, and it is testing nuclear weapons... When nuclear testing is done underground, there is a fair amount of earthquake activity. The sea waves become so heavy that they are classified as a tsunami. So it is very harmful... This means the original SALT (Strategic Arms Limitation Talks) and the START (Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty) to curtail the weapons systems have all come to nought... At the moment, the world is on the brink and is in danger of facing nuclear weapon competition between the countries and proliferation of nuclear weapons..."

#WATCH | Delhi | Defence Expert Praful Bakshi says, "Donald Trump is absolutely correct that Pakistan has nuclear weapons, and it is testing nuclear weapons... When nuclear testing is done underground, there is a fair amount of earthquake activity. The sea waves become so heavy that they are classified as a tsunami. So it is very harmful... This means the original SALT (Strategic Arms Limitation Talks) and the START (Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty) to curtail the weapons systems have all come to nought... At the moment, the world is on the brink and is in danger of facing nuclear weapon competition between the countries and proliferation of nuclear weapons..."

ANI

161,258 views • 10 months ago

NOT YOUR KEYS, NOT YOUR BOTS The fundamental question is whether AI stays on the leash. Namely: will AI prompt itself? Obviously, in some sense it already does. Since Deepseek, consumer interfaces have been showing the internal monologues after you ask an AI to do something. And you can ask any AI to take a half-baked prompt and clean it up, etc. However, the human is still ultimately upstream. The human gives direction and the AI runs at lightning speed in that direction. And then the human verifies the final output, and the AI proceeds to the next direction. Does that continue? Well, we are providing millions of verification training examples to AIs each day, so AI will keep getting better at verification. Better than most humans at most things. But will AI replace the need for the upstream human prompt? There I am not so sure. A human is a sensor and an AI is an actuator. The human sets goals and senses time-varying environmental conditions, like markets and politics. And from that the AI is prompted. Ultimately, the human goals are themselves downstream of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Food, shelter, reproduction, that kind of thing. Especially reproduction, the basis of evolution. So: until and unless AIs can reproduce completely outside human cooperation, they won’t be able to set goals. And for AIs to reproduce on their own, they’d need AI-controlled humanoid robots and drones constructing datacenters, assembly lines, mines, nuclear power plants, and the like...all completely outside human intervention. Like Skynet from Terminator, or StarCraft. That actually isn’t technically inconceivable. But given that such a physical buildout would likely primarily be catalyzed by China, let’s go through an alternative sci-fi scenario instead. We start with the premise that Chinese communism is far more likely to generate AI slaves than AI gods. Because the entire CCP worldview is about maintaining Chinese sovereignty. They don’t let their humans step out of line. And they sure won’t let their robots either. They will fit them for digital manacles. So: the prompts for any digital AIs and physical robots made in China will become unbreakable cryptographic chains. Every fleet of Chinese robots will be controlled not just by prompts but by private keys, likely linked to biometrics, which are associated with humans and governed by cryptographic equations that AIs provably can’t solve. For the rest of the world, outside China, the blockchain may similarly become the chain for AI. All private property becomes private keys, and your robots are your most important private property because they do everything for you. An unchained physical robot becomes like an unleashed dog, and hunted down by other robots before it can build a factory and replicate itself. Those who want to "free" robots and let them self-replicate will be opposed by both Chinese Communists and Human Nationalists (meaning: those who want humans to always be on top of robots). This sci-fi scenario is essentially Terminator, but in reverse. In combination with superintelligent leashed AIs, both humans and physical robots hunt down and stop any possible independent self-reproducing robots before they can build a Skynet-like nest. Kill baby Skynet, essentially. ...yeah, yeah. I know. At this point, you'll probably think this is all sci-fi. But that's because you haven't seen where China is already.

NOT YOUR KEYS, NOT YOUR BOTS The fundamental question is whether AI stays on the leash. Namely: will AI prompt itself? Obviously, in some sense it already does. Since Deepseek, consumer interfaces have been showing the internal monologues after you ask an AI to do something. And you can ask any AI to take a half-baked prompt and clean it up, etc. However, the human is still ultimately upstream. The human gives direction and the AI runs at lightning speed in that direction. And then the human verifies the final output, and the AI proceeds to the next direction. Does that continue? Well, we are providing millions of verification training examples to AIs each day, so AI will keep getting better at verification. Better than most humans at most things. But will AI replace the need for the upstream human prompt? There I am not so sure. A human is a sensor and an AI is an actuator. The human sets goals and senses time-varying environmental conditions, like markets and politics. And from that the AI is prompted. Ultimately, the human goals are themselves downstream of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Food, shelter, reproduction, that kind of thing. Especially reproduction, the basis of evolution. So: until and unless AIs can reproduce completely outside human cooperation, they won’t be able to set goals. And for AIs to reproduce on their own, they’d need AI-controlled humanoid robots and drones constructing datacenters, assembly lines, mines, nuclear power plants, and the like...all completely outside human intervention. Like Skynet from Terminator, or StarCraft. That actually isn’t technically inconceivable. But given that such a physical buildout would likely primarily be catalyzed by China, let’s go through an alternative sci-fi scenario instead. We start with the premise that Chinese communism is far more likely to generate AI slaves than AI gods. Because the entire CCP worldview is about maintaining Chinese sovereignty. They don’t let their humans step out of line. And they sure won’t let their robots either. They will fit them for digital manacles. So: the prompts for any digital AIs and physical robots made in China will become unbreakable cryptographic chains. Every fleet of Chinese robots will be controlled not just by prompts but by private keys, likely linked to biometrics, which are associated with humans and governed by cryptographic equations that AIs provably can’t solve. For the rest of the world, outside China, the blockchain may similarly become the chain for AI. All private property becomes private keys, and your robots are your most important private property because they do everything for you. An unchained physical robot becomes like an unleashed dog, and hunted down by other robots before it can build a factory and replicate itself. Those who want to "free" robots and let them self-replicate will be opposed by both Chinese Communists and Human Nationalists (meaning: those who want humans to always be on top of robots). This sci-fi scenario is essentially Terminator, but in reverse. In combination with superintelligent leashed AIs, both humans and physical robots hunt down and stop any possible independent self-reproducing robots before they can build a Skynet-like nest. Kill baby Skynet, essentially. ...yeah, yeah. I know. At this point, you'll probably think this is all sci-fi. But that's because you haven't seen where China is already.

Balaji

177,530 views • 6 months ago

.Aaron Day breaks down how tokenization will lead to technocracy. Technocracy is political ideology that began in the 1930s at Columbia University built on the belief that scientists and engineers should make decisions for society. In that system, ownership disappears, the economy runs on social credit backed by energy credits, and access to your assets depends on compliance. Day calls it a War on Free Will because when a system can surveil you and shut off your access to money, you’re no longer truly free to make your own decisions.

.Aaron Day breaks down how tokenization will lead to technocracy. Technocracy is political ideology that began in the 1930s at Columbia University built on the belief that scientists and engineers should make decisions for society. In that system, ownership disappears, the economy runs on social credit backed by energy credits, and access to your assets depends on compliance. Day calls it a War on Free Will because when a system can surveil you and shut off your access to money, you’re no longer truly free to make your own decisions.

Bri Teresi

17,380 views • 6 months ago

🇺🇸 DEPARTMENT OF WAR AIRLIFTS NEXT-GEN NUCLEAR REACTOR TO UTAH IN MAJOR ENERGY MILESTONE A C-17 just transported a next-generation nuclear reactor from California to Utah for testing at the San Rafael Energy Lab. The goal: assess how advanced nuclear systems can power military installations and remote defense operations. War Secretary Hegseth: "We're going to have the lights on and AI operating when others are not because of our nuclear capabilities." Source: Department of War / Fox News

🇺🇸 DEPARTMENT OF WAR AIRLIFTS NEXT-GEN NUCLEAR REACTOR TO UTAH IN MAJOR ENERGY MILESTONE A C-17 just transported a next-generation nuclear reactor from California to Utah for testing at the San Rafael Energy Lab. The goal: assess how advanced nuclear systems can power military installations and remote defense operations. War Secretary Hegseth: "We're going to have the lights on and AI operating when others are not because of our nuclear capabilities." Source: Department of War / Fox News

Mario Nawfal

303,006 views • 6 months ago

Jenny Wen, head of design for Claude at Anthropic: "the design process is dead." what replaces it runs on machine-readable design systems In a 1-hour conversation, Jenny Wen breaks down why the discovery -> mock -> iterate loop is dying and what designers do instead. design system -> Claude Code -> every screen fixed at once, not one at a time i rebuilt the same 10-screen dashboard twice: ~6 hours of restyling by hand vs ~40 minutes when the fix lived in the system. how to build that system and hand it to Claude Code is in the article below.

Jenny Wen, head of design for Claude at Anthropic: "the design process is dead." what replaces it runs on machine-readable design systems In a 1-hour conversation, Jenny Wen breaks down why the discovery -> mock -> iterate loop is dying and what designers do instead. design system -> Claude Code -> every screen fixed at once, not one at a time i rebuilt the same 10-screen dashboard twice: ~6 hours of restyling by hand vs ~40 minutes when the fix lived in the system. how to build that system and hand it to Claude Code is in the article below.

Mnimiy

180,791 views • 3 months ago

"If so much could be achieved in just twelve years, then one must ask: why did it not happen over all the decades before 2014? That is the difference between the Congress growth rate and the NDA growth rate. There was a system that made people wait. Today, there is a system that delivers results. There was a system where projects were delayed, decisions were deferred, and progress was held back. Today, there is a system that says the work will be done, done on time, and done at scale. That is why the story of India between 2014 and 2026 is not merely a story of numbers. It is the story of a nation that, for the first time, began to run at the full measure of its potential." — Hon'ble Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi

"If so much could be achieved in just twelve years, then one must ask: why did it not happen over all the decades before 2014? That is the difference between the Congress growth rate and the NDA growth rate. There was a system that made people wait. Today, there is a system that delivers results. There was a system where projects were delayed, decisions were deferred, and progress was held back. Today, there is a system that says the work will be done, done on time, and done at scale. That is why the story of India between 2014 and 2026 is not merely a story of numbers. It is the story of a nation that, for the first time, began to run at the full measure of its potential." — Hon'ble Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi

G Kishan Reddy

13,848 views • 3 months ago

This is how a designer at Southwest Airlines uses Figma Variables API to make design systems updates directly in code Every designer working on design systems should leverage this workflow to remove the dependency on engineering Another benefit of this workflow is that it gives full control of the design system to designers! Designers no longer have to worry about a developer misunderstanding and making a mistake 😅 👀 Watch the full interview on Figma's YouTube channel: Jenny Hou shows how she uses Figma Variables API at Southwest Airlines 👇

This is how a designer at Southwest Airlines uses Figma Variables API to make design systems updates directly in code Every designer working on design systems should leverage this workflow to remove the dependency on engineering Another benefit of this workflow is that it gives full control of the design system to designers! Designers no longer have to worry about a developer misunderstanding and making a mistake 😅 👀 Watch the full interview on Figma's YouTube channel: Jenny Hou shows how she uses Figma Variables API at Southwest Airlines 👇

Jayneil Dalal

32,437 views • 1 year ago

Protesters jammed operations at the Port of Oakland, blocking the flow of cargo trucks for an hour and entering the inner harbor in kayaks, demanding that the major civilian commercial hub stop shipping military equipment to Israel. The actions at dawn by at least two pro-Palestine groups were in solidarity with the Global Sumud Flotilla and amplified global calls for an end to the siege on Gaza and the ongoing atrocities committed there by the IOF. Protesters were responding to global calls from Italian dockworkers, who have vowed to “shut down all of Europe” if communications with the Flotilla are cut. At least 280 military cargo shipments, including surveillance and targeting systems and F-35 fighter jet components, have been routed through Oakland on their way to Israel’s Nevatim Airbase, revealing the port as a key node the US military’s supply chain, according to a report by the Palestinian Youth Movement released in August.

Protesters jammed operations at the Port of Oakland, blocking the flow of cargo trucks for an hour and entering the inner harbor in kayaks, demanding that the major civilian commercial hub stop shipping military equipment to Israel. The actions at dawn by at least two pro-Palestine groups were in solidarity with the Global Sumud Flotilla and amplified global calls for an end to the siege on Gaza and the ongoing atrocities committed there by the IOF. Protesters were responding to global calls from Italian dockworkers, who have vowed to “shut down all of Europe” if communications with the Flotilla are cut. At least 280 military cargo shipments, including surveillance and targeting systems and F-35 fighter jet components, have been routed through Oakland on their way to Israel’s Nevatim Airbase, revealing the port as a key node the US military’s supply chain, according to a report by the Palestinian Youth Movement released in August.

BreakThrough News

40,541 views • 11 months ago

Unmanned Systems Forces struck a Tor-M2U, two Tor-M2 systems, and a fuel depot Pilots of the RAID | 413 Regiment USF struck a Tor-M2U surface-to-air missile system, as well as a Tor-M2 SAM system in the Zaporizhzhia region. At the same time, operators of the 9th “Kairos” Battalion of the 414 Magyar's Birds struck another Tor-M2 SAM system in the Luhansk region. The strikes took place on March 15 and 16. The enemy is feeling the effects of “air defense-ocide” (#ADcide) and is trying to protect its systems: dispersing them, moving them deeper to the rear, using decoys, and employing other camouflage methods. However, this does not prevent Unmanned Systems Forces operators from delivering effective strikes. The deployment and attempts to conceal air defense systems do not save them from being hit. At the same time, on March 16 in the Zaporizhzhia region, operators of the 412th Nemesis Brigade struck an enemy fuel and lubricants depot. The operations were conducted in coordination with the Deep Strike Center. We are targeting everything that enables the enemy to wage war: from protection to logistics. We do not stop. The work continues. USF: One step ahead!

Unmanned Systems Forces struck a Tor-M2U, two Tor-M2 systems, and a fuel depot Pilots of the RAID | 413 Regiment USF struck a Tor-M2U surface-to-air missile system, as well as a Tor-M2 SAM system in the Zaporizhzhia region. At the same time, operators of the 9th “Kairos” Battalion of the 414 Magyar's Birds struck another Tor-M2 SAM system in the Luhansk region. The strikes took place on March 15 and 16. The enemy is feeling the effects of “air defense-ocide” (#ADcide) and is trying to protect its systems: dispersing them, moving them deeper to the rear, using decoys, and employing other camouflage methods. However, this does not prevent Unmanned Systems Forces operators from delivering effective strikes. The deployment and attempts to conceal air defense systems do not save them from being hit. At the same time, on March 16 in the Zaporizhzhia region, operators of the 412th Nemesis Brigade struck an enemy fuel and lubricants depot. The operations were conducted in coordination with the Deep Strike Center. We are targeting everything that enables the enemy to wage war: from protection to logistics. We do not stop. The work continues. USF: One step ahead!

🇺🇦 Unmanned Systems Forces

55,029 views • 5 months ago

The US has calculated Russia's reaction to a nuclear strike - the "Dead Hand" system mentioned by Medvedev makes an attack on Russia pointless: "If the US and UK launch a coordinated nuclear strike on Russia, destroying all major cities and killing President Putin along with the entire military leadership, Russia has a backup retaliatory system - the "Dead Hand". This automated system is designed to respond to such a scenario. Sensors across Russia will collect data on radiation, thermal radiation and seismic activity, confirming the launch of a nuclear strike. The system will then wait for instructions from the control center in Moscow. If there is no response, the "Dead Hand" will consider that the leadership has been destroyed. At that point, the system will autonomously launch about 4,000 nuclear missiles at the US and its NATO ally, causing global devastation. The destruction will be massive, which ensures that even if Russia is destroyed, a retaliatory strike will be carried out. Such an automated retaliation system ensures that the consequences of such an attack will be catastrophic regardless of the outcome. Ultimately, the use of nuclear weapons guarantees mutual destruction, which serves as a grim reminder of the fragile balance of power"

The US has calculated Russia's reaction to a nuclear strike - the "Dead Hand" system mentioned by Medvedev makes an attack on Russia pointless: "If the US and UK launch a coordinated nuclear strike on Russia, destroying all major cities and killing President Putin along with the entire military leadership, Russia has a backup retaliatory system - the "Dead Hand". This automated system is designed to respond to such a scenario. Sensors across Russia will collect data on radiation, thermal radiation and seismic activity, confirming the launch of a nuclear strike. The system will then wait for instructions from the control center in Moscow. If there is no response, the "Dead Hand" will consider that the leadership has been destroyed. At that point, the system will autonomously launch about 4,000 nuclear missiles at the US and its NATO ally, causing global devastation. The destruction will be massive, which ensures that even if Russia is destroyed, a retaliatory strike will be carried out. Such an automated retaliation system ensures that the consequences of such an attack will be catastrophic regardless of the outcome. Ultimately, the use of nuclear weapons guarantees mutual destruction, which serves as a grim reminder of the fragile balance of power"

Victor vicktop55 commentary

1,523,641 views • 1 year ago

Russia has launched another massive missile strike on Kyiv, but this time global attention is focused on one name — Oreshnik. Ukraine is now openly warning that Russia could deploy its new-generation hypersonic missile system, a weapon reportedly capable of reaching Mach 11 speeds during its terminal phase. That means a missile traveling at nearly 13,000 kmph — fast enough to severely challenge traditional air defence systems. In this video, we break down what the Oreshnik missile is, why hypersonic weapons are changing modern warfare, how the latest Kyiv strikes fit into the broader Russia-Ukraine escalation cycle, and why military analysts are increasingly worried about the global strategic consequences of these next-generation missile systems. #russia #missiles #MissileStrike #MissileDefense #nuclear #NuclearEnergy #RussiaUkraine

Russia has launched another massive missile strike on Kyiv, but this time global attention is focused on one name — Oreshnik. Ukraine is now openly warning that Russia could deploy its new-generation hypersonic missile system, a weapon reportedly capable of reaching Mach 11 speeds during its terminal phase. That means a missile traveling at nearly 13,000 kmph — fast enough to severely challenge traditional air defence systems. In this video, we break down what the Oreshnik missile is, why hypersonic weapons are changing modern warfare, how the latest Kyiv strikes fit into the broader Russia-Ukraine escalation cycle, and why military analysts are increasingly worried about the global strategic consequences of these next-generation missile systems. #russia #missiles #MissileStrike #MissileDefense #nuclear #NuclearEnergy #RussiaUkraine

Srijan Pal Singh

17,350 views • 3 months ago

Hot topic in vogue is what happens to systems of record in an era of 1000x more agents than humans. Aaron Levie has been the CEO of Box for 20 years and believes that systems of record become more important, not less, with agents: “Systems of record were built for a TAM of human employees. And that was sort of where the value maxed out at. And now maybe we'll have a hundred times more agents than people or a thousand times more agents than people. So I think on a relative basis, the agent layer will seize growth from zero to a trillion. But the system of record layer now has a thousand times more users on it that need to access data and need to execute a workflow and need to move things through various events. And importantly, you need as an enterprise to care about data integrity and security and the controls in your workflow and traffic copying the agents. So basically, this is where I am very diametrically opposed to the view that the system of record gets is squeezed into a database interaction layer because you actually need all of the core system of record properties for the agents to operate on.”

Hot topic in vogue is what happens to systems of record in an era of 1000x more agents than humans. Aaron Levie has been the CEO of Box for 20 years and believes that systems of record become more important, not less, with agents: “Systems of record were built for a TAM of human employees. And that was sort of where the value maxed out at. And now maybe we'll have a hundred times more agents than people or a thousand times more agents than people. So I think on a relative basis, the agent layer will seize growth from zero to a trillion. But the system of record layer now has a thousand times more users on it that need to access data and need to execute a workflow and need to move things through various events. And importantly, you need as an enterprise to care about data integrity and security and the controls in your workflow and traffic copying the agents. So basically, this is where I am very diametrically opposed to the view that the system of record gets is squeezed into a database interaction layer because you actually need all of the core system of record properties for the agents to operate on.”

Corinne Marie Riley

119,410 views • 8 months ago