Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨 Miliband Crumbles When Asked the One Question That Matters: How Much Would UK Net Zero Cool the Planet? Lee Anderson asked Energy Secretary Ed Miliband a simple, direct question in Parliament: “If Britain went Net Zero tomorrow, by how much would global temperatures fall?” As the man in...

Skint_Eastwood1's profile picture

Skint Eastwood

26,249 subscribers

238,456 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikWissenschaft & Technologie
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfĂźgbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 BLAIR BOMBSHELL: SCRAP NET ZERO NOW! “THERE’S NO LOGIC TO IT!” 🔥 Tony Blair Demands Starmer Scrap Milibands Mad Expensive Green Agenda Immediately‼️ Blair has just shredded mad Miliband and the entire net zero agenda. There’s zero logic to it! Asked directly for total clarity: “For total clarity, are you advising Keir Starmer to rip up Ed Milibands green energy targets?” Blair bluntly replied: “Yes I am!” He explained that the 3 biggest emitters in the world today are China, America and India. Together they “account for just over 50% of global emissions.” All are pursuing cheap energy. They still do renewable energy. “China for example builds more renewable energy than the rest of the world put together.” “It just means that the lens from which they judge policy is cheap energy.” He rightly points out Britain’s emissions are “under 1% of global emissions” so we can’t solve climate change. And says he “doesnt understand the logic behind” imposing costs on businesses and consumers to pursue net zero when the rest of the world is not doing so. He says again he doesnt understand why we’re shutting down North Sea oil and gas industry in circumstances where no other country in the world is doing that if “they’ve still got a requirement to import energy from oil and gas”. It costs way too much and “is not the right priority!” Net zero is not saving the planet. It is economic self-harm. Blair has just blown the entire agenda apart.
1:46

🚨 BLAIR BOMBSHELL: SCRAP NET ZERO NOW! “THERE’S NO LOGIC TO IT!” 🔥 Tony Blair Demands Starmer Scrap Milibands Mad Expensive Green Agenda Immediately‼️ Blair has just shredded mad Miliband and the entire net zero agenda. There’s zero logic to it! Asked directly for total clarity: “For total clarity, are you advising Keir Starmer to rip up Ed Milibands green energy targets?” Blair bluntly replied: “Yes I am!” He explained that the 3 biggest emitters in the world today are China, America and India. Together they “account for just over 50% of global emissions.” All are pursuing cheap energy. They still do renewable energy. “China for example builds more renewable energy than the rest of the world put together.” “It just means that the lens from which they judge policy is cheap energy.” He rightly points out Britain’s emissions are “under 1% of global emissions” so we can’t solve climate change. And says he “doesnt understand the logic behind” imposing costs on businesses and consumers to pursue net zero when the rest of the world is not doing so. He says again he doesnt understand why we’re shutting down North Sea oil and gas industry in circumstances where no other country in the world is doing that if “they’ve still got a requirement to import energy from oil and gas”. It costs way too much and “is not the right priority!” Net zero is not saving the planet. It is economic self-harm. Blair has just blown the entire agenda apart.

J Stewart

369,690 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Asking Ed Miliband What commitments were secured at COP30 from the countries responsible for the highest amounts of carbon emissions - China, America & India - to reduce their emissions, given their leaders Xi, Trump and Modi couldn’t be bothered to attend? Or did those countries fail to commit to reducing their carbon emissions and to phase out their use of fossil fuels allowing instead the Secretary of State to walk his ideological path of net zero which is destroying the UK’s industrial and manufacturing base and pushing our population into poverty with ever higher energy bills? Amazingly he said he didn’t agree with the second part of the question! Doesn’t he see what is happening in the country? Doesn’t he know the cost of energy in the UK?
0:45

Asking Ed Miliband What commitments were secured at COP30 from the countries responsible for the highest amounts of carbon emissions - China, America & India - to reduce their emissions, given their leaders Xi, Trump and Modi couldn’t be bothered to attend? Or did those countries fail to commit to reducing their carbon emissions and to phase out their use of fossil fuels allowing instead the Secretary of State to walk his ideological path of net zero which is destroying the UK’s industrial and manufacturing base and pushing our population into poverty with ever higher energy bills? Amazingly he said he didn’t agree with the second part of the question! Doesn’t he see what is happening in the country? Doesn’t he know the cost of energy in the UK?

Esther McVey

57,794 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

A recent paper by USC's Harry D'Angelo and climatologist Judith Curry calls Net Zero "a harmful and unnecessary goal," writing, "There is no credible evidence of an existential threat from global warming." They point out that Earth has warmed about 1.3C since the 1800s, and during that warming humanity has grown healthier, wealthier and more productive than ever. The authors warn that abandoning fossil fuels would cripple food, steel, cement, plastics and global supply chains, producing huge costs and no measurable benefit. They point out that even if the US cut emissions to zero today, the temperature effect by 2100 would be less than 0.2C - statistically undetectable. The real threat isn't climate. It's reckless energy policy.
0:45

A recent paper by USC's Harry D'Angelo and climatologist Judith Curry calls Net Zero "a harmful and unnecessary goal," writing, "There is no credible evidence of an existential threat from global warming." They point out that Earth has warmed about 1.3C since the 1800s, and during that warming humanity has grown healthier, wealthier and more productive than ever. The authors warn that abandoning fossil fuels would cripple food, steel, cement, plastics and global supply chains, producing huge costs and no measurable benefit. They point out that even if the US cut emissions to zero today, the temperature effect by 2100 would be less than 0.2C - statistically undetectable. The real threat isn't climate. It's reckless energy policy.

Electroverse

40,556 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Last night, the Senate voted on my motion to scrap net zero and put cheap, reliable energy first. Labor, the Greens and the crossbench voted it down. And the Liberals? Cowards. They had the notice. They had the time. And they still ran for the exits. Not one of them had the guts to stand and be counted. Only One Nation is united in standing up for Australian families, workers, and small businesses. Net zero is hammering our economy. Power bills are out of control. Manufacturing is being wiped out. And ordinary Australians are paying the price, while out-of-touch politicians and inner-city idealists push fantasy policies they’ll never have to live under. One Nation is doing what the major parties won’t, standing up for the people. If you're fed up with being ignored, you’re not alone. We’re with you and we’re not backing down.
3:53

Last night, the Senate voted on my motion to scrap net zero and put cheap, reliable energy first. Labor, the Greens and the crossbench voted it down. And the Liberals? Cowards. They had the notice. They had the time. And they still ran for the exits. Not one of them had the guts to stand and be counted. Only One Nation is united in standing up for Australian families, workers, and small businesses. Net zero is hammering our economy. Power bills are out of control. Manufacturing is being wiped out. And ordinary Australians are paying the price, while out-of-touch politicians and inner-city idealists push fantasy policies they’ll never have to live under. One Nation is doing what the major parties won’t, standing up for the people. If you're fed up with being ignored, you’re not alone. We’re with you and we’re not backing down.

Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺

104,507 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

We’re the world’s most energy rich country yet we have some of the highest electricity prices. We export our energy resources while skyrocketing power bills and taxes ensure the flow of money from everyday Australians' pockets to the carpet-bagging predatory billionaires behind the net-zero fraud. Climate scammers fear the net-zero tide is turning. The public is waking up to this economic suicide and seeing the climate agenda for what it is - a corrupt globalist ideology and wealth transfer scheme. The latest unhinged meltdown from the Greens has nothing at all to do with rising temperatures. It has everything to do with fear of political irrelevancy. I was pleased to hear the Liberals and Nationals speak supportively three times on our motion, but disappointed that not one member of those parties were in the senate chamber for the vote. The message is clear and the backlash globally is now growing: Australia must cancel net-zero or the cost will be ruinous. #NetZero #ClimateBoiling #ClimateScam
5:04

We’re the world’s most energy rich country yet we have some of the highest electricity prices. We export our energy resources while skyrocketing power bills and taxes ensure the flow of money from everyday Australians' pockets to the carpet-bagging predatory billionaires behind the net-zero fraud. Climate scammers fear the net-zero tide is turning. The public is waking up to this economic suicide and seeing the climate agenda for what it is - a corrupt globalist ideology and wealth transfer scheme. The latest unhinged meltdown from the Greens has nothing at all to do with rising temperatures. It has everything to do with fear of political irrelevancy. I was pleased to hear the Liberals and Nationals speak supportively three times on our motion, but disappointed that not one member of those parties were in the senate chamber for the vote. The message is clear and the backlash globally is now growing: Australia must cancel net-zero or the cost will be ruinous. #NetZero #ClimateBoiling #ClimateScam

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

45,634 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Britain is in an Energy Emergency. But the Government is FAILING TO ACT. They have no plan, no idea what to do, and they’re leaving us exposed. So today we’re launching The LFG Emergency Energy Bill to SAVE OUR INDUSTRIES and GET BILLS DOWN Here’s how it would get bills down IMMEDIATELY: 1️⃣ SCRAP all levies on energy bills. These stealth taxes on the British people are unnecessarily hiking up their bills by hundreds of pounds. 2️⃣ REOPEN THE NORTH SEA, and directly deploy the tax revenue generated to GET BILLS DOWN. 3️⃣ Stop new CfD contracts and launch an investigation into the system that signed them off. Last year, billpayers paid £1.5 billion for big renewable corporations to THROW ENERGY AWAY. By 2030, it’ll be £8 billion. The existing settlement is a national scandal. 4️⃣ Scrap Clean Power 2030 targets. These needless constraints have pushed civil servants to procure wind at any cost – and at huge expense to the British people. 5️⃣ DITCH the duties of energy regulators, NESO and Ofgem, towards Net Zero goals, so their only focus is to MINIMISE ENERGY COSTS, subject to security of supply. 6️⃣ Hold auctions for connecting to the grid, and directly deploy the revenue generated to GET BILLS DOWN Our Emergency Energy Bill has cross-party support. It is ready to PASS IMMEDIATELY. It does what governments for the past 20 years didn’t – it takes RADICAL ACTION to SAVE OUR INDUSTRIES and GET BILLS DOWN. There’s no excuse. Last week, the US suspended access to some of the world’s leading frontier AI models. Britain is vulnerable - and our energy prices are strangling our national security. We cannot afford to be at the mercy of other countries or events beyond our control any longer. The Government needs to GET BILLS DOWN NOW or explain why they’re still letting this emergency destroy our future. Force Westminster to ACT. Send our Bill to your local MP and sign our letter to the Prime Minister and Ed Miliband. GET BILLS DOWN, NOW!
17:10

Britain is in an Energy Emergency. But the Government is FAILING TO ACT. They have no plan, no idea what to do, and they’re leaving us exposed. So today we’re launching The LFG Emergency Energy Bill to SAVE OUR INDUSTRIES and GET BILLS DOWN Here’s how it would get bills down IMMEDIATELY: 1️⃣ SCRAP all levies on energy bills. These stealth taxes on the British people are unnecessarily hiking up their bills by hundreds of pounds. 2️⃣ REOPEN THE NORTH SEA, and directly deploy the tax revenue generated to GET BILLS DOWN. 3️⃣ Stop new CfD contracts and launch an investigation into the system that signed them off. Last year, billpayers paid £1.5 billion for big renewable corporations to THROW ENERGY AWAY. By 2030, it’ll be £8 billion. The existing settlement is a national scandal. 4️⃣ Scrap Clean Power 2030 targets. These needless constraints have pushed civil servants to procure wind at any cost – and at huge expense to the British people. 5️⃣ DITCH the duties of energy regulators, NESO and Ofgem, towards Net Zero goals, so their only focus is to MINIMISE ENERGY COSTS, subject to security of supply. 6️⃣ Hold auctions for connecting to the grid, and directly deploy the revenue generated to GET BILLS DOWN Our Emergency Energy Bill has cross-party support. It is ready to PASS IMMEDIATELY. It does what governments for the past 20 years didn’t – it takes RADICAL ACTION to SAVE OUR INDUSTRIES and GET BILLS DOWN. There’s no excuse. Last week, the US suspended access to some of the world’s leading frontier AI models. Britain is vulnerable - and our energy prices are strangling our national security. We cannot afford to be at the mercy of other countries or events beyond our control any longer. The Government needs to GET BILLS DOWN NOW or explain why they’re still letting this emergency destroy our future. Force Westminster to ACT. Send our Bill to your local MP and sign our letter to the Prime Minister and Ed Miliband. GET BILLS DOWN, NOW!

Looking for Growth

232,684 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Tony Abbott brilliantly articulates the energy policy that should have been argued before the Australian people. Protecting coal fire stations and gas. No subsidies on renewables and lifting the ban on nuclear. ‘If asked about Net Zero I would have said… sure we want to get to net zero as soon as we reasonably can. The Chinese say they might get there by 2060. The Indians say they might get there by 2070…. BUT We will never hurt your standard of living. Destroy your job. Or drive our industries offshore. This would have been a nuanced but highly effective approach for the many that still believe in net zero. 🔥🔥
1:56

Tony Abbott brilliantly articulates the energy policy that should have been argued before the Australian people. Protecting coal fire stations and gas. No subsidies on renewables and lifting the ban on nuclear. ‘If asked about Net Zero I would have said… sure we want to get to net zero as soon as we reasonably can. The Chinese say they might get there by 2060. The Indians say they might get there by 2070…. BUT We will never hurt your standard of living. Destroy your job. Or drive our industries offshore. This would have been a nuanced but highly effective approach for the many that still believe in net zero. 🔥🔥

Kat A 🌸

33,259 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 TRUMP WEIGHS IN ON STARMER RESIGNATION DRAMA AND SAYS NET ZERO IS KILLING YOUR COUNTRY! “Should he stay or go?” Trump: “That’s up to him. But I told him from day one, you’re getting killed on energy. You’re windmilling your country to death! Open up the North Sea! You have one of the greatest sources of energy in the world. Open up the North Sea!” Trump didn’t stop there. He hammered that the UK and Europe are being “very very hurt by immigration” and the results are impossible to deny. Skyrocketing energy bills. Blackout fears. Streets that no longer feel like home. Factories closing while windmills spin uselessly in the North Sea winds. Trump called it exactly right. If Starmer had listened instead of pushing the same failed globalist playbook of open borders, net-zero insanity, and energy surrender, he might not be staring down the barrel of political oblivion right now. Britain had the North Sea oil & gas jackpot. Instead they chose virtue-signaling windmills and mass migration.
0:20

🚨 TRUMP WEIGHS IN ON STARMER RESIGNATION DRAMA AND SAYS NET ZERO IS KILLING YOUR COUNTRY! “Should he stay or go?” Trump: “That’s up to him. But I told him from day one, you’re getting killed on energy. You’re windmilling your country to death! Open up the North Sea! You have one of the greatest sources of energy in the world. Open up the North Sea!” Trump didn’t stop there. He hammered that the UK and Europe are being “very very hurt by immigration” and the results are impossible to deny. Skyrocketing energy bills. Blackout fears. Streets that no longer feel like home. Factories closing while windmills spin uselessly in the North Sea winds. Trump called it exactly right. If Starmer had listened instead of pushing the same failed globalist playbook of open borders, net-zero insanity, and energy surrender, he might not be staring down the barrel of political oblivion right now. Britain had the North Sea oil & gas jackpot. Instead they chose virtue-signaling windmills and mass migration.

J Stewart

104,783 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Starmer’s pathetic deflection on energy bills and the cost of living crisis is getting embarrassing and very tiresome. Keir’s out here AGAIN whining that Ukraine and Iran conflicts are the “biggest impact” on Britain’s cost of living and sky-high bills. Yes, those conflicts are real, global, and largely out of any PM’s hands. But here’s what’s infuriating: as Prime Minister he never, ever mentions the giant self-inflicted wound staring him in the face — Net Zero! He and Ed Miliband could scrap or slash the green levies and targets tomorrow and bring bills down immediately. Instead, radio silence. Energy bosses themselves told Parliament that green levies are a major reason bills stay punishingly high and even if wholesale gas prices crash, those costs won’t vanish. Businesses, households, and even some politicians have been screaming this for years. This isn’t bad luck from foreign wars. It’s deliberate policy choice by Starmer and Miliband. They own every extra pound on your bill. Stop hiding behind international crises and do something about it!
0:35

Starmer’s pathetic deflection on energy bills and the cost of living crisis is getting embarrassing and very tiresome. Keir’s out here AGAIN whining that Ukraine and Iran conflicts are the “biggest impact” on Britain’s cost of living and sky-high bills. Yes, those conflicts are real, global, and largely out of any PM’s hands. But here’s what’s infuriating: as Prime Minister he never, ever mentions the giant self-inflicted wound staring him in the face — Net Zero! He and Ed Miliband could scrap or slash the green levies and targets tomorrow and bring bills down immediately. Instead, radio silence. Energy bosses themselves told Parliament that green levies are a major reason bills stay punishingly high and even if wholesale gas prices crash, those costs won’t vanish. Businesses, households, and even some politicians have been screaming this for years. This isn’t bad luck from foreign wars. It’s deliberate policy choice by Starmer and Miliband. They own every extra pound on your bill. Stop hiding behind international crises and do something about it!

J Stewart

20,372 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

I asked a simple question in the House today: freedom of navigation through one of the world’s most critical energy routes matters to Britain, to our allies, and to global stability. The question now is simple: will we act, within international law, to defend it if necessary? There seems to be some confusion on the Labour Government backbenches that somehow the Government has kept Britain out of this war. The truth is we are not out of it. Our bases are already in the firing line. Our allies are already in the firing line. Britain cannot pretend we are somehow separate from the risks that come with defending international security. When the Chancellor earlier today spoke about the importance of the Straits of Hormuz, and the necessity of taking action where appropriate, does that mean the UK will, and under international law can, take action if Iranian threats against tankers and shipping in the Straits of Hormuz continue?
0:46

I asked a simple question in the House today: freedom of navigation through one of the world’s most critical energy routes matters to Britain, to our allies, and to global stability. The question now is simple: will we act, within international law, to defend it if necessary? There seems to be some confusion on the Labour Government backbenches that somehow the Government has kept Britain out of this war. The truth is we are not out of it. Our bases are already in the firing line. Our allies are already in the firing line. Britain cannot pretend we are somehow separate from the risks that come with defending international security. When the Chancellor earlier today spoke about the importance of the Straits of Hormuz, and the necessity of taking action where appropriate, does that mean the UK will, and under international law can, take action if Iranian threats against tankers and shipping in the Straits of Hormuz continue?

Iain Duncan Smith MP Chingford & Woodford Green

31,856 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

“Remember when first campaigning to be elected, the Albanese government said it would reduce power bills by $275. Surely the slogan ‘Fire the Liar’ has relevance to millions of Australians? Was it a lie to campaign in 2022 on the slogan ‘A Better Future’? Is this how Australians feel today? The cost of energy feeds into everything we use, eat and manufacture. Food is dearer, housing is dearer and rent is dearer. There is your cost of living crisis. Albanese lied to become elected, and Australians are paying for it.” The cost of energy feeds into everything we use, eat and manufacture. It is central to why the cost of living is such a struggle for so many Australians. Remember when the Albanese Government said it would reduce energy bills by $275? Remember when, in 2022, it campaigned on the slogan "A Better Future”? All lies. Through net zero, the Albanese government has fuelled cost of living struggles for everyday Aussies. One Nation will scrap net zero, make full use of our natural resources, and engage with nuclear energy. All steps that would make a decisive contribution to bringing down your energy bills.
0:46

“Remember when first campaigning to be elected, the Albanese government said it would reduce power bills by $275. Surely the slogan ‘Fire the Liar’ has relevance to millions of Australians? Was it a lie to campaign in 2022 on the slogan ‘A Better Future’? Is this how Australians feel today? The cost of energy feeds into everything we use, eat and manufacture. Food is dearer, housing is dearer and rent is dearer. There is your cost of living crisis. Albanese lied to become elected, and Australians are paying for it.” The cost of energy feeds into everything we use, eat and manufacture. It is central to why the cost of living is such a struggle for so many Australians. Remember when the Albanese Government said it would reduce energy bills by $275? Remember when, in 2022, it campaigned on the slogan "A Better Future”? All lies. Through net zero, the Albanese government has fuelled cost of living struggles for everyday Aussies. One Nation will scrap net zero, make full use of our natural resources, and engage with nuclear energy. All steps that would make a decisive contribution to bringing down your energy bills.

One Nation Australia

10,953 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen

Australia sits on world-class coal, gas, uranium — and we’re too bloody stupid to use it. Instead, we export it dirt cheap to China and India, then go broke chasing “net zero.” 🔻 Australia = 1.2% of global emissions Even if we hit net zero tomorrow, it wouldn’t change a thing. China and India will still burn our coal — and laugh. They don’t believe the climate cult. They know net zero is a slogan, not a solution. But our government? They’ve been trojan-horsed by green ideology — pushing climate lies to gain control, not protect the environment. 💸 Power bills exploding 🔋 70% of green infrastructure is foreign-owned ➡️ You’re paying more, so profits can go offshore Meanwhile: 🪓 We shut down baseload power 🔪 Machete attacks rise 👶 Kids are told there are 52 genders And no politician has the guts to say it. Want to fix this? ✅ Build coal and gas plants ✅ Tax exports — use it to slash bills ✅ Deport violent migrants ✅ End woke ideology in schools ✅ Put Aussies first We light the world… and sit in the dark. The world is laughing — and they should be.
2:45

Australia sits on world-class coal, gas, uranium — and we’re too bloody stupid to use it. Instead, we export it dirt cheap to China and India, then go broke chasing “net zero.” 🔻 Australia = 1.2% of global emissions Even if we hit net zero tomorrow, it wouldn’t change a thing. China and India will still burn our coal — and laugh. They don’t believe the climate cult. They know net zero is a slogan, not a solution. But our government? They’ve been trojan-horsed by green ideology — pushing climate lies to gain control, not protect the environment. 💸 Power bills exploding 🔋 70% of green infrastructure is foreign-owned ➡️ You’re paying more, so profits can go offshore Meanwhile: 🪓 We shut down baseload power 🔪 Machete attacks rise 👶 Kids are told there are 52 genders And no politician has the guts to say it. Want to fix this? ✅ Build coal and gas plants ✅ Tax exports — use it to slash bills ✅ Deport violent migrants ✅ End woke ideology in schools ✅ Put Aussies first We light the world… and sit in the dark. The world is laughing — and they should be.

2 Worlds Collide Podcast

38,166 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 Conservative MP Harriet Cross TORE into Labour’s energy policy in the House of Commons. 🔥 While Norway’s own Labour government is busy issuing new North Sea oil & gas licences and expanding drilling to secure its energy future, Britain’s Labour government has banned new licensing here at home. The result? British workers fly to Norway for oil jobs, and we pay billions every year to import Norwegian gas from the very same North Sea basin we refuse to touch. Harriet nailed it in the Commons: We’re shutting down our own industry, exporting jobs and cash, and making ourselves more dependent on foreign energy, all in the name of “net zero” virtue signalling. This isn’t environmental leadership. It’s national stupidity.
1:07

🚨 Conservative MP Harriet Cross TORE into Labour’s energy policy in the House of Commons. 🔥 While Norway’s own Labour government is busy issuing new North Sea oil & gas licences and expanding drilling to secure its energy future, Britain’s Labour government has banned new licensing here at home. The result? British workers fly to Norway for oil jobs, and we pay billions every year to import Norwegian gas from the very same North Sea basin we refuse to touch. Harriet nailed it in the Commons: We’re shutting down our own industry, exporting jobs and cash, and making ourselves more dependent on foreign energy, all in the name of “net zero” virtue signalling. This isn’t environmental leadership. It’s national stupidity.

Skint Eastwood

40,211 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Brad Lander will bring an intense climate doomer agenda to the House. Last year, he said that because Wall Street pumped the brakes on ESG, "global policy" to tax and/or ban combustible energy (no mention of nuclear) will be necessary for his Net Zero agenda. "A global or a U.S. or a U.S. and European price on carbon would be great, or genuinely mandated policies of transition and conversion." "Anybody that is playing footsie with Donald Trump at this moment is responsible for burning the planet down." "The red states are squawking and they scare people politically, but I honestly haven't met one -- and that is leading folks like BlackRock and State Street and JP Morgan and many others to draw back, to leave Climate Action 100+ -- I haven't talked to one finance leader who believes it. Those finance leaders see the same climate landscape as the scientists do. And there will be some political costs from the squawking, but if you share this analysis -- that if we don't reduce fossil fuel emissions, we will burn up trillions of dollars in shared value -- then you should act based on it."
4:47

Brad Lander will bring an intense climate doomer agenda to the House. Last year, he said that because Wall Street pumped the brakes on ESG, "global policy" to tax and/or ban combustible energy (no mention of nuclear) will be necessary for his Net Zero agenda. "A global or a U.S. or a U.S. and European price on carbon would be great, or genuinely mandated policies of transition and conversion." "Anybody that is playing footsie with Donald Trump at this moment is responsible for burning the planet down." "The red states are squawking and they scare people politically, but I honestly haven't met one -- and that is leading folks like BlackRock and State Street and JP Morgan and many others to draw back, to leave Climate Action 100+ -- I haven't talked to one finance leader who believes it. Those finance leaders see the same climate landscape as the scientists do. And there will be some political costs from the squawking, but if you share this analysis -- that if we don't reduce fossil fuel emissions, we will burn up trillions of dollars in shared value -- then you should act based on it."

Breitbart News

48,717 Aufrufe • vor 21 Tagen

The Liberal Party’s Green Delusionist can’t help himself… Mr. Guilbeault can’t seem to let go. The global facts on energy consumption, human development economics, population, and the environmental impact of Canada’s cleaner natural gas on the global coal-fired grid make his falsehoods on peak oil and pipeline capacity obvious. His years in Environment featured a 90% miss on emissions reduction, the burning down of Jasper after years of warnings to his failed Parks team, and the end of his punitive, hated carbon tax by a PM desperate to win an election by running as a conservative. So Mr. Guilbeault is lashing out. It shouldn’t be necessary to state the obvious but given the lazy press - and the fact that this climate fraud remains in this Cabinet full of the usual suspects that killed our economy for a decade, here is global energy in three simple charts: 1. FACT: Global energy demand and fossil fuel use is relentlessly rising. The world is using more of every form of energy including coal, oil and gas. 2. WHY? Because the greatest humanitarian human development moment in world history has been the energy intensive promotion of 1 billion people out of grinding poverty into the middle class in China, India and across Asia the past three decades. This is what is causing vastly higher energy consumption and rising global emissions. 3. HOW IS CANADA RELEVANT IN THE PLANET? With only 0.5% of global population and vast land and energy resources, what can we do to impact global emissions? - Alberta has more oil than the USA, Russia and China combined. We have more than enough gas to supply the needs of 4 billion people in India, China, Indonesia and across Asia. - We have the capacity and economic and proximity advantages to structurally displace a large amount of the dependence on thermal coal on the electrical grid across Asia - Because the retrofit of coal to gas is straightforward, our clean gas can cut the global emissions off the electrical grid of 4 billion people, at a scale equivalent to 2-3 times our entire national carbon footprint. Canada has been so blessed with so much. We have in front of us one of the biggest opportunities in history: To enhance human economic development commercially, environmentally, and diplomatically with trillions of dollars in trade and the soft power of becoming a critical part of global energy security. While cutting global emissions at scale. So why are green ideologues like Steven Guilbeault so angry? Because it must be killing him softly that the #1 climate action and most profound impact of Canada on global emissions in the coming decade will be trade from Alberta to Asia by the very same entrepreneurs and builders whose only request for a decade is that Stephen Guilbeault and his sad dystopian punitive green worldview just get out of the way.
2:16

The Liberal Party’s Green Delusionist can’t help himself… Mr. Guilbeault can’t seem to let go. The global facts on energy consumption, human development economics, population, and the environmental impact of Canada’s cleaner natural gas on the global coal-fired grid make his falsehoods on peak oil and pipeline capacity obvious. His years in Environment featured a 90% miss on emissions reduction, the burning down of Jasper after years of warnings to his failed Parks team, and the end of his punitive, hated carbon tax by a PM desperate to win an election by running as a conservative. So Mr. Guilbeault is lashing out. It shouldn’t be necessary to state the obvious but given the lazy press - and the fact that this climate fraud remains in this Cabinet full of the usual suspects that killed our economy for a decade, here is global energy in three simple charts: 1. FACT: Global energy demand and fossil fuel use is relentlessly rising. The world is using more of every form of energy including coal, oil and gas. 2. WHY? Because the greatest humanitarian human development moment in world history has been the energy intensive promotion of 1 billion people out of grinding poverty into the middle class in China, India and across Asia the past three decades. This is what is causing vastly higher energy consumption and rising global emissions. 3. HOW IS CANADA RELEVANT IN THE PLANET? With only 0.5% of global population and vast land and energy resources, what can we do to impact global emissions? - Alberta has more oil than the USA, Russia and China combined. We have more than enough gas to supply the needs of 4 billion people in India, China, Indonesia and across Asia. - We have the capacity and economic and proximity advantages to structurally displace a large amount of the dependence on thermal coal on the electrical grid across Asia - Because the retrofit of coal to gas is straightforward, our clean gas can cut the global emissions off the electrical grid of 4 billion people, at a scale equivalent to 2-3 times our entire national carbon footprint. Canada has been so blessed with so much. We have in front of us one of the biggest opportunities in history: To enhance human economic development commercially, environmentally, and diplomatically with trillions of dollars in trade and the soft power of becoming a critical part of global energy security. While cutting global emissions at scale. So why are green ideologues like Steven Guilbeault so angry? Because it must be killing him softly that the #1 climate action and most profound impact of Canada on global emissions in the coming decade will be trade from Alberta to Asia by the very same entrepreneurs and builders whose only request for a decade is that Stephen Guilbeault and his sad dystopian punitive green worldview just get out of the way.

David Knight Legg

36,518 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 Australia’s fuel crisis isn’t “just bad luck, or “due to the Iran conflict”, it’s the direct result of net zero climate policies. The media in Australia are quick to blame the Iran war for empty diesel pumps and soaring prices. But that’s only the spark. The real fire was lit years ago by climate policies that made domestic refining unviable. Australia once had 8 oil refineries. Thanks to the Paris Agreement, net zero targets, the Safeguard Mechanism (their carbon tax/credit system), and tightening emissions rules, most shut down. Now they have just 2 left — both needing subsidies to survive. Australia imports ~90% of its fuel and sits on only ~39 days of petrol, ~29-31 days of diesel, and ~30 days of jet fuel. A huge, car-and-truck-dependent country with fragile supply chains. The same mechanism is at work here in Britain. Our North Sea oil and gas producers face 78% effective taxation through the windfall/energy profits levy , explicitly designed to disincentivise carbon-intensive activity. Investment has collapsed, companies have left, and we’re more exposed than ever. We still need diesel for tractors, trucks, mining, and freight. Without it, food doesn’t get to shelves, supermarkets empty, and economies grind to a halt. This isn’t abstract “climate action”, it’s self-inflicted vulnerability in energy security and food security. Australia is the warning light flashing for the UK and Europe. The war made it urgent, but the weakness was baked in by net zero ideology that prioritises carbon credits and emissions targets over keeping the lights on and the wheels turning. The smart move? REPEAL the damaging targets. EXIT or renegotiate the Paris Agreement. Prioritise domestic energy production and realistic reserves. Put affordability and security first, before shortages become the new normal here too. Australia is living the future net zero is building for all of us. We should be paying attention, not just blaming foreign conflicts. What do you think? Is it time to put reality before ideology? #NetZeroReality #EnergySecurity #AustraliaWarning #UKFuelCrisis
2:03

🚨 Australia’s fuel crisis isn’t “just bad luck, or “due to the Iran conflict”, it’s the direct result of net zero climate policies. The media in Australia are quick to blame the Iran war for empty diesel pumps and soaring prices. But that’s only the spark. The real fire was lit years ago by climate policies that made domestic refining unviable. Australia once had 8 oil refineries. Thanks to the Paris Agreement, net zero targets, the Safeguard Mechanism (their carbon tax/credit system), and tightening emissions rules, most shut down. Now they have just 2 left — both needing subsidies to survive. Australia imports ~90% of its fuel and sits on only ~39 days of petrol, ~29-31 days of diesel, and ~30 days of jet fuel. A huge, car-and-truck-dependent country with fragile supply chains. The same mechanism is at work here in Britain. Our North Sea oil and gas producers face 78% effective taxation through the windfall/energy profits levy , explicitly designed to disincentivise carbon-intensive activity. Investment has collapsed, companies have left, and we’re more exposed than ever. We still need diesel for tractors, trucks, mining, and freight. Without it, food doesn’t get to shelves, supermarkets empty, and economies grind to a halt. This isn’t abstract “climate action”, it’s self-inflicted vulnerability in energy security and food security. Australia is the warning light flashing for the UK and Europe. The war made it urgent, but the weakness was baked in by net zero ideology that prioritises carbon credits and emissions targets over keeping the lights on and the wheels turning. The smart move? REPEAL the damaging targets. EXIT or renegotiate the Paris Agreement. Prioritise domestic energy production and realistic reserves. Put affordability and security first, before shortages become the new normal here too. Australia is living the future net zero is building for all of us. We should be paying attention, not just blaming foreign conflicts. What do you think? Is it time to put reality before ideology? #NetZeroReality #EnergySecurity #AustraliaWarning #UKFuelCrisis

Anika

41,267 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

German MEP Christine Anderson dismantles the climate moralization scam with brutal, logical precision. "How else would they be able to tax people into oblivion?" she asks. The central question isn't about saving the planet—it's about control. "How is taxing people into poverty going to save our planet? The evidence is nowhere to be found. It's humorous to even think we could, especially the way we're doing it in Germany." She then highlights the pinnacle of this absurdity: Germany's energy policy. "We shut down all of our nuclear power plants. We had the highest standards, the safest plants, the best engineering in the world. And we decommissioned them because of a catastrophe on the other side of the world—a tsunami in Japan that never reached our shores. That same tsunami somehow destroyed all our power plants in the minds of our politicians." Under Angela Merkel's moratorium, this self-sabotage began. And for what? "Despite the Greens preaching that CO2 is the world's most toxic poison, they eliminated our largest source of clean, baseload energy. The replacement? A fantasy built on unreliable alternatives." "We're carpeting prime farmland with solar panels—in a country not known for its sunshine. We're tearing down ancient, hundred-year-old forests to erect monstrous windmills—in a nation notorious for 'wind droughts' where the air is still for weeks. And when the wind doesn't blow in Germany, it isn't blowing across all of Europe. The entire scheme is geographically illiterate." So what is the result of this virtuous green revolution? "We now buy nuclear power from France and Poland. We import the very energy we demonized and abandoned. We didn't save the planet; we outsourced our energy production and made ourselves poorer and more dependent." Her conclusion is a mic drop moment for every free-thinking citizen: "Anyone with two brain cells left intact has to see this for what it is: the biggest scam ever perpetrated, all under the guise of moral superiority." This isn't environmentalism. It's economic suicide dressed up as virtue.
3:04

German MEP Christine Anderson dismantles the climate moralization scam with brutal, logical precision. "How else would they be able to tax people into oblivion?" she asks. The central question isn't about saving the planet—it's about control. "How is taxing people into poverty going to save our planet? The evidence is nowhere to be found. It's humorous to even think we could, especially the way we're doing it in Germany." She then highlights the pinnacle of this absurdity: Germany's energy policy. "We shut down all of our nuclear power plants. We had the highest standards, the safest plants, the best engineering in the world. And we decommissioned them because of a catastrophe on the other side of the world—a tsunami in Japan that never reached our shores. That same tsunami somehow destroyed all our power plants in the minds of our politicians." Under Angela Merkel's moratorium, this self-sabotage began. And for what? "Despite the Greens preaching that CO2 is the world's most toxic poison, they eliminated our largest source of clean, baseload energy. The replacement? A fantasy built on unreliable alternatives." "We're carpeting prime farmland with solar panels—in a country not known for its sunshine. We're tearing down ancient, hundred-year-old forests to erect monstrous windmills—in a nation notorious for 'wind droughts' where the air is still for weeks. And when the wind doesn't blow in Germany, it isn't blowing across all of Europe. The entire scheme is geographically illiterate." So what is the result of this virtuous green revolution? "We now buy nuclear power from France and Poland. We import the very energy we demonized and abandoned. We didn't save the planet; we outsourced our energy production and made ourselves poorer and more dependent." Her conclusion is a mic drop moment for every free-thinking citizen: "Anyone with two brain cells left intact has to see this for what it is: the biggest scam ever perpetrated, all under the guise of moral superiority." This isn't environmentalism. It's economic suicide dressed up as virtue.

Camus

36,069 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

VIDEO | Talking on whether India will stop buying Russian oil as claimed by the US, foreign secretary Vikram Misri says the country is neither dependent on any single source for this, nor intend to be. He says, "You are aware that India is a net importer in the oil and gas sector. We are a developing economy; we have to be conscious about our resource availability. Naturally, when you are dependent to the extent of 80–85% on an imported resource, you have to have concerns about the possibility of inflation driven by energy costs. So, it’s not surprising therefore that our foremost priority is to safeguard the interests of Indian consumers insofar as energy is concerned—to really ensure that they receive adequate energy at the right price and through reliable and secure supplies. And our import policy insofar as energy is concerned is therefore driven entirely by these objectives. Now, you would also have observed that in recent years, the global economy has faced significant uncertainties which have had a major impact on the stability of global energy markets... We are neither dependent on any single source for this, nor do we intend to be. And it is natural for the mix of sources to vary from time to time, depending on objective market conditions. Our approach is to maintain multiple sources of supply and diversify them as appropriate to ensure stability. Therefore, I would say that the more diversified we are in this area, the more secure we are. So far, as actual sourcing of energy is concerned—again, all of you follow this closely, so you know that the actual sourcing is done by oil companies. Oil companies in the public sector, oil companies in the private sector. And they make decisions based on market conditions. They assess availability at any given point in time, they assess risks, they assess costs in this process. And obviously, all of these companies also have their own internal accountability-related processes to look at and certain fiduciary responsibilities in the market..."
5:45

VIDEO | Talking on whether India will stop buying Russian oil as claimed by the US, foreign secretary Vikram Misri says the country is neither dependent on any single source for this, nor intend to be. He says, "You are aware that India is a net importer in the oil and gas sector. We are a developing economy; we have to be conscious about our resource availability. Naturally, when you are dependent to the extent of 80–85% on an imported resource, you have to have concerns about the possibility of inflation driven by energy costs. So, it’s not surprising therefore that our foremost priority is to safeguard the interests of Indian consumers insofar as energy is concerned—to really ensure that they receive adequate energy at the right price and through reliable and secure supplies. And our import policy insofar as energy is concerned is therefore driven entirely by these objectives. Now, you would also have observed that in recent years, the global economy has faced significant uncertainties which have had a major impact on the stability of global energy markets... We are neither dependent on any single source for this, nor do we intend to be. And it is natural for the mix of sources to vary from time to time, depending on objective market conditions. Our approach is to maintain multiple sources of supply and diversify them as appropriate to ensure stability. Therefore, I would say that the more diversified we are in this area, the more secure we are. So far, as actual sourcing of energy is concerned—again, all of you follow this closely, so you know that the actual sourcing is done by oil companies. Oil companies in the public sector, oil companies in the private sector. And they make decisions based on market conditions. They assess availability at any given point in time, they assess risks, they assess costs in this process. And obviously, all of these companies also have their own internal accountability-related processes to look at and certain fiduciary responsibilities in the market..."

Press Trust of India

63,178 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨TRUMP ISSUES URGENT WARNING TO EUROPE & THE UK AS STARMER’S DISASTROUS POLICIES EXPOSE THE MADNESS! 🚩 President Trump tore into Europe and the UK at the UN, slamming the “double-tailed monster” of uncontrolled immigration and radical green energy that’s destroying your heritage, your economies, and your future. This is worth rewatching. “They must take control strongly and immediately of the unmitigated immigration disaster and the fake energy catastrophe before it’s too late!” On the climate scam: “The carbon footprint is a hoax made up by people with evil intentions. It’s a con job.” He exposed the total waste: “At great cost and expense Europe reduced its carbon footprint by 37%. Congratulations! You cost yourself a lot of jobs. A lot of factories closed. For all of that sacrifice and much more it’s been totally wiped out by a global increase of 54%. Much of it coming from China, which produces more CO2 than all the other developed nations in the world.” Zero benefit. All downside. Total unnecessary acts of national self harm. Yet Starmer still doubles down on open borders that fueled grooming gang scandals, rams through Net Zero madness driving up bills, and cracks down on free speech to silence critics. Utter lunacy.
2:19

🚨TRUMP ISSUES URGENT WARNING TO EUROPE & THE UK AS STARMER’S DISASTROUS POLICIES EXPOSE THE MADNESS! 🚩 President Trump tore into Europe and the UK at the UN, slamming the “double-tailed monster” of uncontrolled immigration and radical green energy that’s destroying your heritage, your economies, and your future. This is worth rewatching. “They must take control strongly and immediately of the unmitigated immigration disaster and the fake energy catastrophe before it’s too late!” On the climate scam: “The carbon footprint is a hoax made up by people with evil intentions. It’s a con job.” He exposed the total waste: “At great cost and expense Europe reduced its carbon footprint by 37%. Congratulations! You cost yourself a lot of jobs. A lot of factories closed. For all of that sacrifice and much more it’s been totally wiped out by a global increase of 54%. Much of it coming from China, which produces more CO2 than all the other developed nations in the world.” Zero benefit. All downside. Total unnecessary acts of national self harm. Yet Starmer still doubles down on open borders that fueled grooming gang scandals, rams through Net Zero madness driving up bills, and cracks down on free speech to silence critics. Utter lunacy.

J Stewart

135,647 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Zack Polanski speaking at the Bakers, Food and Allied Workers Union, "The government are very good at recognising the problems, at recognising the crisis, the supply chain issues, the energy crisis in Iran, the energy crisis from Ukraine" "But very rarely do they seem to have solutions, things to actually do about it. And when they do have solutions, rarely are they solutions of the scale we need" "So if we look at the energy crisis, for instance, we've heard recently that energy bills in this country could go up 200 pound per year, on average for a household" "That's completely unacceptable" "And far too often I don't hear the solutions from the government that are just so obvious to ramp up our investment in renewable energy to make sure that we're insulating every single home in Britain that needs it" "So it is both warm in the winter and cool in the summer as well as creating hundreds of thousands of good green jobs that could be in public sectors that could be unionised so people are paid properly and treated with dignity and, and care and to remove the subsidies from the fossil fuel companies" "The same people who are destroying our planet should not be getting subsidised by the government at a time when we're in the climate crisis" "But as you know, well it's not just an energy crisis, it's a crisis for food too. Because what we've seen in Iran or implicated by Iran is a fertiliser crisis" "We know how devastating and damaging that already is for our supply chains and for the food that we produce" "And this badly needs intervention, it badly needs help. And what did we see this government do? Well, they cut tariffs on chocolates and biscuits" "Now don't get me wrong, there is room to do this and that will provide a small relief for some families" "That's not a long term plan for UK businesses and UK food production" "That's not a Long term plan to invest in resilience and in our food supply chains, in our energy" "It's not a long term plan that takes these issues seriously, not in the next few weeks or months, but goes we need to fundamentally rethink our systems change and how we provide food security as one of the most fundamental things in our society"
2:16

Zack Polanski speaking at the Bakers, Food and Allied Workers Union, "The government are very good at recognising the problems, at recognising the crisis, the supply chain issues, the energy crisis in Iran, the energy crisis from Ukraine" "But very rarely do they seem to have solutions, things to actually do about it. And when they do have solutions, rarely are they solutions of the scale we need" "So if we look at the energy crisis, for instance, we've heard recently that energy bills in this country could go up 200 pound per year, on average for a household" "That's completely unacceptable" "And far too often I don't hear the solutions from the government that are just so obvious to ramp up our investment in renewable energy to make sure that we're insulating every single home in Britain that needs it" "So it is both warm in the winter and cool in the summer as well as creating hundreds of thousands of good green jobs that could be in public sectors that could be unionised so people are paid properly and treated with dignity and, and care and to remove the subsidies from the fossil fuel companies" "The same people who are destroying our planet should not be getting subsidised by the government at a time when we're in the climate crisis" "But as you know, well it's not just an energy crisis, it's a crisis for food too. Because what we've seen in Iran or implicated by Iran is a fertiliser crisis" "We know how devastating and damaging that already is for our supply chains and for the food that we produce" "And this badly needs intervention, it badly needs help. And what did we see this government do? Well, they cut tariffs on chocolates and biscuits" "Now don't get me wrong, there is room to do this and that will provide a small relief for some families" "That's not a long term plan for UK businesses and UK food production" "That's not a Long term plan to invest in resilience and in our food supply chains, in our energy" "It's not a long term plan that takes these issues seriously, not in the next few weeks or months, but goes we need to fundamentally rethink our systems change and how we provide food security as one of the most fundamental things in our society"

Farrukh

31,310 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat