Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

MILLS: Overnight polling on the strikes is overwhelmingly negative. A majority of Rs either don’t know why we’re doing this or don’t support it. Iran wasn’t an imminent threat in Jan 2025. This is an Israeli objective, and taxpayers shouldn’t be asked to support it.

Grace Chong, MBI

192,913 subscribers

62,810 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Finance

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Curt Mills says polling on the Iran strikes “is overwhelmingly negative”: “Iran isn’t an imminent threat to the US. It’s an Israeli objective. Israel wants to expand in the Middle East. That’s their prerogative but they shouldn’t ask the American taxpayer to support it."

Curt Mills says polling on the Iran strikes “is overwhelmingly negative”: “Iran isn’t an imminent threat to the US. It’s an Israeli objective. Israel wants to expand in the Middle East. That’s their prerogative but they shouldn’t ask the American taxpayer to support it."

The American Conservative

16,599 views • 4 months ago

🇮🇱🇮🇷 RITTER: ISRAEL'S STRIKES SIGNAL “REGIME CHANGE” OBJECTIVE FOR IRAN Scott Ritter: "This is a decisive measure taken by Israel. Israel is all in on whatever objective it is they’re trying to achieve. I believe this is a regime change activity… an existential struggle between Israel and Iran. Either Iran is defeated and the regime is overthrown, or Israel is compelled to back away."

🇮🇱🇮🇷 RITTER: ISRAEL'S STRIKES SIGNAL “REGIME CHANGE” OBJECTIVE FOR IRAN Scott Ritter: "This is a decisive measure taken by Israel. Israel is all in on whatever objective it is they’re trying to achieve. I believe this is a regime change activity… an existential struggle between Israel and Iran. Either Iran is defeated and the regime is overthrown, or Israel is compelled to back away."

Mario Nawfal

441,852 views • 1 year ago

Distinguished Columbia Univ. Prof. Jeff Sachs on the US public's opinion on the war against Iran: “The American people overwhelmingly want this war to stop. They don’t support it. They know that it is leading to disaster.”

Distinguished Columbia Univ. Prof. Jeff Sachs on the US public's opinion on the war against Iran: “The American people overwhelmingly want this war to stop. They don’t support it. They know that it is leading to disaster.”

Steve Hanke

15,471 views • 1 month ago

Bolton on Iran: I don’t think there was an imminent threat. But I don’t think the US has to wait until a threat is imminent. When people ask me how soon Iran could get nuclear weapons, the real answer is 72 hours. That possibility exists to this very day. 1/

Bolton on Iran: I don’t think there was an imminent threat. But I don’t think the US has to wait until a threat is imminent. When people ask me how soon Iran could get nuclear weapons, the real answer is 72 hours. That possibility exists to this very day. 1/

Tymofiy Mylovanov

35,069 views • 3 months ago

We’re in a housing crisis. But I don’t accept that this is just the way it has to be. And I know you don’t either. Demand better. I want to hear from you.

We’re in a housing crisis. But I don’t accept that this is just the way it has to be. And I know you don’t either. Demand better. I want to hear from you.

Janis Irwin

44,364 views • 3 years ago

Curt Mills speaks with Lomez and Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ on Iran: Mills: “Iran is an autocracy but so is all of Central Asia and we don’t go in and knock out the leader of Tajikistan. It’s difficult to see why the risk of intervention is not greater than the risk of doing nothing."

Curt Mills speaks with Lomez and Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ on Iran: Mills: “Iran is an autocracy but so is all of Central Asia and we don’t go in and knock out the leader of Tajikistan. It’s difficult to see why the risk of intervention is not greater than the risk of doing nothing."

The American Conservative

75,949 views • 4 months ago

This is wild. Tim seems to know what he’s talking about here. Of course, I wasn’t there and don’t know for sure. I don’t see how this could be miscommunication, though. Could it be? It seems like one or the other is lying. Wild.

This is wild. Tim seems to know what he’s talking about here. Of course, I wasn’t there and don’t know for sure. I don’t see how this could be miscommunication, though. Could it be? It seems like one or the other is lying. Wild.

Danny Silva

120,810 views • 2 months ago

Rand Paul: "Really, the debate now should be, is a 47 year old conflict an imminent threat? Were there changes in their nuclear program that made this an imminent threat? And I don't think the evidence is there that this was an imminent threat that would allow the president to go to war on his own."

Rand Paul: "Really, the debate now should be, is a 47 year old conflict an imminent threat? Were there changes in their nuclear program that made this an imminent threat? And I don't think the evidence is there that this was an imminent threat that would allow the president to go to war on his own."

Aaron Rupar

228,697 views • 3 months ago

Whew! Hillary Clinton this morning on the U.S.-Iran talks that fell apart: “This is hard work. You don’t just show up in Geneva or Islamabad, talk for a bunch of hours, and go away. This is hard, disciplined effort that has to go into diplomacy to reach any results. And I don’t see this administration either wanting to do it or, frankly, being capable of doing it…”

Whew! Hillary Clinton this morning on the U.S.-Iran talks that fell apart: “This is hard work. You don’t just show up in Geneva or Islamabad, talk for a bunch of hours, and go away. This is hard, disciplined effort that has to go into diplomacy to reach any results. And I don’t see this administration either wanting to do it or, frankly, being capable of doing it…”

Christopher Webb

591,895 views • 3 months ago

Pretending to be an elementary school teacher doing this in a classroom meant for tiny children to sell OF subscriptions is DISGUSTING and so are the people who support it!

Sensitive content

Pretending to be an elementary school teacher doing this in a classroom meant for tiny children to sell OF subscriptions is DISGUSTING and so are the people who support it!

Joey Swoll

5,430,739 views • 11 months ago

a fanatical Zionist asks Chomsky if he would ever support the US and Israel preemptively attacking a country because it presents an imminent threat, as is now being claimed about Iran. He replies: If anyone has that right, it is Iran against the US and Israel

a fanatical Zionist asks Chomsky if he would ever support the US and Israel preemptively attacking a country because it presents an imminent threat, as is now being claimed about Iran. He replies: If anyone has that right, it is Iran against the US and Israel

☀️👀

109,483 views • 1 year ago

“I support paternity DNA tests 100%. I don’t know why women don’t support it. The rate at which paternity fraud is occurring is alarming.” — Deputy National Women’s Organizer of the NDC, Dzifa Tega, has voiced strong support for mandatory paternity DNA testing in an interview, saying she is baffled by women who oppose it and believes the measure is essential for fairness toward men

“I support paternity DNA tests 100%. I don’t know why women don’t support it. The rate at which paternity fraud is occurring is alarming.” — Deputy National Women’s Organizer of the NDC, Dzifa Tega, has voiced strong support for mandatory paternity DNA testing in an interview, saying she is baffled by women who oppose it and believes the measure is essential for fairness toward men

𝐀𝐒𝐊

240,368 views • 2 months ago

🇺🇸🇮🇷 NATO Chief Rutte praises U.S. war against Iran: "It is crucial what the President of U.S. is doing... because this is an existencial threat to Israel. It is necessary and I commend the president's leadership on this."

🇺🇸🇮🇷 NATO Chief Rutte praises U.S. war against Iran: "It is crucial what the President of U.S. is doing... because this is an existencial threat to Israel. It is necessary and I commend the president's leadership on this."

Mario Nawfal

145,292 views • 3 months ago

Jake Sullivan on Iran: The United States is at war with Iran in the middle of an active shooting war that, in my view, was a war of choice. It did not stem from an imminent threat to the United States. We have yet to hear a clear and distinctive answer to the question: Why? What is this all about and what are we trying to achieve?

Jake Sullivan on Iran: The United States is at war with Iran in the middle of an active shooting war that, in my view, was a war of choice. It did not stem from an imminent threat to the United States. We have yet to hear a clear and distinctive answer to the question: Why? What is this all about and what are we trying to achieve?

Clash Report

17,487 views • 2 months ago

Ossoff: Was it the assessment of the intelligence community that there was an imminent nuclear threat posed by the Iranian regime? Gabbard: The only person who can determine what is and is not an imminent threat is the president. It is not the intelligence community's responsibility to determine what is and is not an imminent threat. Ossoff: It is precisely your responsibility. This is the worldwide threats hearing where, as you noted in your opening testimony quote, you represent the ic's assessment of threats.

Ossoff: Was it the assessment of the intelligence community that there was an imminent nuclear threat posed by the Iranian regime? Gabbard: The only person who can determine what is and is not an imminent threat is the president. It is not the intelligence community's responsibility to determine what is and is not an imminent threat. Ossoff: It is precisely your responsibility. This is the worldwide threats hearing where, as you noted in your opening testimony quote, you represent the ic's assessment of threats.

Acyn

1,814,482 views • 4 months ago

West has nothing to lose from continuing in Ukraine - they are getting economic growth and workplaces out of it. There is only one thing that will stop them - an imminent threat. Luckily, they've grown so soft anything is an "imminent threat" to them. It might be a drone striking an airport - something we tolerate daily - or could be the prospect of nuclear war.

West has nothing to lose from continuing in Ukraine - they are getting economic growth and workplaces out of it. There is only one thing that will stop them - an imminent threat. Luckily, they've grown so soft anything is an "imminent threat" to them. It might be a drone striking an airport - something we tolerate daily - or could be the prospect of nuclear war.

Margarita Simonyan

14,256 views • 1 year ago

Dwyane Wade on his “your either in or out” comments on statue night “I wanted them to know if you don’t want to be here and the way things are working here… then don’t be here. This is not the org for that… Lebron only stayed 4 years, it wasn’t ran the way he wanted it to, it wasn’t ran the way Wade wanted it to. It’s ran the way Pat Riley is going to run it” (Via DWade) 🎯

Dwyane Wade on his “your either in or out” comments on statue night “I wanted them to know if you don’t want to be here and the way things are working here… then don’t be here. This is not the org for that… Lebron only stayed 4 years, it wasn’t ran the way he wanted it to, it wasn’t ran the way Wade wanted it to. It’s ran the way Pat Riley is going to run it” (Via DWade) 🎯

Heat Central

472,983 views • 1 year ago

HE (RUBIO) DOES NOT UNDERSTAND, AND THIS IS TRUE OF THE VAST MAJORITY OF PEOPLE IN FOREIGN POLICY ESTABLISHMENT IN THIS COUNTRY, THAT FOR RUSSIA, THIS IS AN EXISTENTIAL THREAT. THE POSSIBILITY OF UKRAINE BECOMING A MEMBER OF NATO IS SIMPLY UNACCEPTABLE TO THE RUSSIANS. IT IS AN EXISTENTIAL THREAT, AND THEY ARE NOT GONNA STOP UNTIL UKRAINE AND THE WEST ARE DEFEATED AND THEY BOTH ACCEPT THE FACT THAT UKRAINE HAS TO BE A NEUTRAL STATE, NUMBER ONE, AND IT HAS TO BE DISARMED TO THE POINT OFFENSIVE THREAT TO RUSSIA. - John Mearsheimer

HE (RUBIO) DOES NOT UNDERSTAND, AND THIS IS TRUE OF THE VAST MAJORITY OF PEOPLE IN FOREIGN POLICY ESTABLISHMENT IN THIS COUNTRY, THAT FOR RUSSIA, THIS IS AN EXISTENTIAL THREAT. THE POSSIBILITY OF UKRAINE BECOMING A MEMBER OF NATO IS SIMPLY UNACCEPTABLE TO THE RUSSIANS. IT IS AN EXISTENTIAL THREAT, AND THEY ARE NOT GONNA STOP UNTIL UKRAINE AND THE WEST ARE DEFEATED AND THEY BOTH ACCEPT THE FACT THAT UKRAINE HAS TO BE A NEUTRAL STATE, NUMBER ONE, AND IT HAS TO BE DISARMED TO THE POINT OFFENSIVE THREAT TO RUSSIA. - John Mearsheimer

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

54,393 views • 9 months ago

.Hakeem Jeffries: "There was no intelligence to suggest that Iran presented an imminent threat to the national security interest of the United States of America…no clear objectives, certainly no exit strategy, and that's why there is no public support."

.Hakeem Jeffries: "There was no intelligence to suggest that Iran presented an imminent threat to the national security interest of the United States of America…no clear objectives, certainly no exit strategy, and that's why there is no public support."

CSPAN

20,706 views • 2 months ago