Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Mindblowing Explosion in USA Cape Canaveral 🤯 A Blue Origin rocket exploded during a routine ground test Yes they lost a New Glenn rocket Which can cost over $100 million But the bigger loss may be the launch infrastructure The static-fire test severely damaged the launch complex They’re saying...

DuttShekhar's profile picture

Shekhar Dutt

58,334 subscribers

76,821 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🇺🇸 SUPERCUT - BEZOS’ ROCKET GOES BOOM Blue Origin's New Glenn rocket, owned by Jeff Bezos, exploded on the launch pad in Florida. The rocket was supposed to launch a batch of satellites for Amazon's Leo network, which competes with Starlink. Amazon stated that the satellites were not yet on the rocket at the time of the explosion. Blue Origin stated that the rocket encountered an "anomaly." We can see that, lol. So, Starlink remains the only game in town for now
2:59

🇺🇸 SUPERCUT - BEZOS’ ROCKET GOES BOOM Blue Origin's New Glenn rocket, owned by Jeff Bezos, exploded on the launch pad in Florida. The rocket was supposed to launch a batch of satellites for Amazon's Leo network, which competes with Starlink. Amazon stated that the satellites were not yet on the rocket at the time of the explosion. Blue Origin stated that the rocket encountered an "anomaly." We can see that, lol. So, Starlink remains the only game in town for now

Lord Bebo

24,666 views • 2 months ago

Elon Musk: "Success is uncertain, but entertainment is guaranteed!" You’re watching Blue Origin’s New Glenn rocket explode on the launch pad. The rocket was fully fueled during a static fire test when it detonated, creating one of the largest rocket explosions in U.S. history This was supposed to be Blue Origin’s big SpaceX moment. New Glenn was set to launch Amazon’s LEO satellites next week, their answer to Starlink. But after exploding during a fully fueled static fire test, that launch is off, and the rocket is likely grounded while they investigate. It’s a massive setback, but rocket engineering is brutal. SpaceX failed many times before becoming the most dominant launch provider on Earth. Now the space industry is watching to see if Blue Origin can bounce back, or if SpaceX pulls even further ahead.
0:30

Elon Musk: "Success is uncertain, but entertainment is guaranteed!" You’re watching Blue Origin’s New Glenn rocket explode on the launch pad. The rocket was fully fueled during a static fire test when it detonated, creating one of the largest rocket explosions in U.S. history This was supposed to be Blue Origin’s big SpaceX moment. New Glenn was set to launch Amazon’s LEO satellites next week, their answer to Starlink. But after exploding during a fully fueled static fire test, that launch is off, and the rocket is likely grounded while they investigate. It’s a massive setback, but rocket engineering is brutal. SpaceX failed many times before becoming the most dominant launch provider on Earth. Now the space industry is watching to see if Blue Origin can bounce back, or if SpaceX pulls even further ahead.

SMX 🇺🇸

76,281 views • 2 months ago

Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin rocket exploded during a test in Florida on Thursday night. The explosion briefly painted the sky orange, with no one injured in the blast. Last month, the same rocket, New Glenn, failed a mission to deliver a satellite and prompted an investigation.
0:32

Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin rocket exploded during a test in Florida on Thursday night. The explosion briefly painted the sky orange, with no one injured in the blast. Last month, the same rocket, New Glenn, failed a mission to deliver a satellite and prompted an investigation.

Al Jazeera English

42,916 views • 2 months ago

ICYMI: Blue Origin rocket explodes in massive fireball on Florida launch pad. During a critical engine firing test last night, the powerful vehicle went up in flames, engulfing the site. Jeff Bezos confirmed all personnel are safe, but it's too early to know what went wrong. The rocket was slated to carry 48 satellites into orbit, now a painful setback for Blue Origin, fresh off a $188 million NASA contract for lunar terrain vehicles.
0:47

ICYMI: Blue Origin rocket explodes in massive fireball on Florida launch pad. During a critical engine firing test last night, the powerful vehicle went up in flames, engulfing the site. Jeff Bezos confirmed all personnel are safe, but it's too early to know what went wrong. The rocket was slated to carry 48 satellites into orbit, now a painful setback for Blue Origin, fresh off a $188 million NASA contract for lunar terrain vehicles.

Gunther Eagleman™

25,531 views • 2 months ago

Two days ago NASA just awarded Blue Origin (Jeff Bezos' rocket company) a contract for 3 unmanned moon missions. The Blue Origin rocket just exploded on the launch pad. This will delay Blue Origin while they figure out and fix what went wrong. Military launches will also be put on hold. The US military requires 3 successful certification launches before they will trust Blue Origin with military satellite contracts. This will likely result in more military, NASA and commercial satellites being assigned to SpaceX in the coming years. Video Credit NSF - NASASpaceflight.com
0:25

Two days ago NASA just awarded Blue Origin (Jeff Bezos' rocket company) a contract for 3 unmanned moon missions. The Blue Origin rocket just exploded on the launch pad. This will delay Blue Origin while they figure out and fix what went wrong. Military launches will also be put on hold. The US military requires 3 successful certification launches before they will trust Blue Origin with military satellite contracts. This will likely result in more military, NASA and commercial satellites being assigned to SpaceX in the coming years. Video Credit NSF - NASASpaceflight.com

Wall Street Mav

289,202 views • 2 months ago

A Blue Origin rocket has exploded in a fireball during a late-night launchpad test - shaking nearby homes. Officials say no one was injured and that there is no threat to the public following the "anomaly" at Cape Canaveral in Florida.
0:40

A Blue Origin rocket has exploded in a fireball during a late-night launchpad test - shaking nearby homes. Officials say no one was injured and that there is no threat to the public following the "anomaly" at Cape Canaveral in Florida.

Sky News

21,987 views • 2 months ago

This New Glenn rocket explosion released 20% of the energy of the Hiroshima atomic bomb and that wasn't even the bad part: → The pad: LC-36 is the only pad on Earth that launches New Glenn and now it's gone. Over $1B to build. SpaceX needed 7 months to rebuild after a similar hit. → The deadline: Amazon needs 1,618 satellites up by July 30 to keep its FCC license. It has ~300. The rocket that was supposed to help fix that just blew up twice in a row SpaceX made us believe that landing rockets on barges was a normal expectation. Turns out rocket science is hard after all. Wishing the team a speedy recovery 🚀
0:28

This New Glenn rocket explosion released 20% of the energy of the Hiroshima atomic bomb and that wasn't even the bad part: → The pad: LC-36 is the only pad on Earth that launches New Glenn and now it's gone. Over $1B to build. SpaceX needed 7 months to rebuild after a similar hit. → The deadline: Amazon needs 1,618 satellites up by July 30 to keep its FCC license. It has ~300. The rocket that was supposed to help fix that just blew up twice in a row SpaceX made us believe that landing rockets on barges was a normal expectation. Turns out rocket science is hard after all. Wishing the team a speedy recovery 🚀

Josh Kale

4,978,990 views • 2 months ago

🚨 🚨 BEZOS HAS 3 OPTIONS LEFT AFTER NEW GLENN'S LAUNCHPAD EXPLOSION. ALL 3 ARE CATASTROPHIC. This is the moment nobody wants to talk about. After years of development, a $1B+ heavy-lift rocket program, and a final ground test before Amazon's Kuiper satellite mission → Blue Origin is now boxed into THREE choices. And every single one is a nightmare: ⚠️ OPTION 1: REBUILD LC-36 FROM SCRATCH – The only launchpad Blue Origin owns is now a debris field – One 600-foot lightning tower toppled. Erector-gantry: gone. Ground equipment: destroyed. – Pad rebuilds after a full vehicle explosion take 12–24 months minimum – Amazon's Kuiper constellation — already years behind SpaceX Starlink — falls further behind – Every month of delay costs Amazon market share it cannot get back ⚠️ OPTION 2: BORROW OR BUY LAUNCH CAPACITY FROM A COMPETITOR – The only competitor with available heavy-lift pads is SpaceX – Asking your direct rival for a launchpad is not a business negotiation — it's a surrender – SpaceX has every incentive to slow-walk, overcharge, or simply say no – Amazon would be funding the company that is actively destroying Kuiper's market window – Jeff Bezos built Blue Origin specifically to avoid this dependency ⚠️ OPTION 3: ABSORB THE DELAY AND KEEP INVESTING – New Glenn's first stage was enveloped in fire during a routine hotfire test — the final check before orbital flight – The vehicle collapsed. The upper stage tilted and fell. Fires burned at multiple stories – This wasn't a launch failure. This was a ground test. The hardest problems haven't even been attempted yet. – Blue Origin has no second pad, no backup vehicle, and no timeline for the next attempt – And Starlink already has 7,000+ satellites in orbit Let that sink in. There is no Option 4. There is no clean exit. There is no "we rebuild and catch up by Q4." The media is showing you "rocket science is hard" and "no injuries reported." They're NOT showing you that Blue Origin just destroyed its only launchpad — the single piece of infrastructure that connects years of development to an actual orbital mission — three hours before midnight on May 28, 2026. This is the most consequential single test failure any American space company has faced since SpaceX's Pad 40 explosion in 2016. Follow now → this story is moving fast. RT so others see what's really at stake. Prepare accordingly. 🚨🚨🚨 I'll keep you updated. Turn on notifications. 🚨
0:21

🚨 🚨 BEZOS HAS 3 OPTIONS LEFT AFTER NEW GLENN'S LAUNCHPAD EXPLOSION. ALL 3 ARE CATASTROPHIC. This is the moment nobody wants to talk about. After years of development, a $1B+ heavy-lift rocket program, and a final ground test before Amazon's Kuiper satellite mission → Blue Origin is now boxed into THREE choices. And every single one is a nightmare: ⚠️ OPTION 1: REBUILD LC-36 FROM SCRATCH – The only launchpad Blue Origin owns is now a debris field – One 600-foot lightning tower toppled. Erector-gantry: gone. Ground equipment: destroyed. – Pad rebuilds after a full vehicle explosion take 12–24 months minimum – Amazon's Kuiper constellation — already years behind SpaceX Starlink — falls further behind – Every month of delay costs Amazon market share it cannot get back ⚠️ OPTION 2: BORROW OR BUY LAUNCH CAPACITY FROM A COMPETITOR – The only competitor with available heavy-lift pads is SpaceX – Asking your direct rival for a launchpad is not a business negotiation — it's a surrender – SpaceX has every incentive to slow-walk, overcharge, or simply say no – Amazon would be funding the company that is actively destroying Kuiper's market window – Jeff Bezos built Blue Origin specifically to avoid this dependency ⚠️ OPTION 3: ABSORB THE DELAY AND KEEP INVESTING – New Glenn's first stage was enveloped in fire during a routine hotfire test — the final check before orbital flight – The vehicle collapsed. The upper stage tilted and fell. Fires burned at multiple stories – This wasn't a launch failure. This was a ground test. The hardest problems haven't even been attempted yet. – Blue Origin has no second pad, no backup vehicle, and no timeline for the next attempt – And Starlink already has 7,000+ satellites in orbit Let that sink in. There is no Option 4. There is no clean exit. There is no "we rebuild and catch up by Q4." The media is showing you "rocket science is hard" and "no injuries reported." They're NOT showing you that Blue Origin just destroyed its only launchpad — the single piece of infrastructure that connects years of development to an actual orbital mission — three hours before midnight on May 28, 2026. This is the most consequential single test failure any American space company has faced since SpaceX's Pad 40 explosion in 2016. Follow now → this story is moving fast. RT so others see what's really at stake. Prepare accordingly. 🚨🚨🚨 I'll keep you updated. Turn on notifications. 🚨

🇨🇳 Guo Shen 郭深

889,724 views • 2 months ago

🚨#BREAKING: New footage captured by nearby witnesses shows the massive explosion that occurred during a static fire test of Blue Origin's New Glenn rocket. Blue Origin said in a statement: We experienced an anomaly during today's hotfire test. All personnel have been accounted for. We will provide updates as we learn more." The explosion was reportedly heard up to 15 miles away, while the massive fireball was allegedly visible from locations as far away as the Orlando, Florida area. The cause of the incident remains under investigation.
0:59

🚨#BREAKING: New footage captured by nearby witnesses shows the massive explosion that occurred during a static fire test of Blue Origin's New Glenn rocket. Blue Origin said in a statement: We experienced an anomaly during today's hotfire test. All personnel have been accounted for. We will provide updates as we learn more." The explosion was reportedly heard up to 15 miles away, while the massive fireball was allegedly visible from locations as far away as the Orlando, Florida area. The cause of the incident remains under investigation.

H E A T E D R E P 🔥 R T S

111,919 views • 2 months ago

Here’s why $RKLB just spent ~$8B acquiring $IRDM. Rocket Lab wants to own the network, spectrum and recurring revenue layer once satellites are in orbit which is why this deal is really about vertical integration as Neutron comes online. Once Rocket Lab can launch Iridium satellites on Neutron then it internalizes a cost that used to flow to third-party launch providers making the deal way more accretive over time as Neutron comes online. What I like is that Iridium also brings something Rocket Lab stack has lacked which is recurring, high-margin service revenue tied to global connectivity, direct-to-device and government communications. The space economy is splitting into companies that can launch and refresh their own networks and companies that have to rent access to orbit. $SPCX already proved which side wins because if you own both launch and the network then you control the cost structure, refresh cycle and margin stack in a way third-party launch customers cannot match. Launch gets you to orbit but connectivity is what you monetize once you're there and the companies that own both the launch layer and the network become the platforms of the space economy.
3:10

Here’s why $RKLB just spent ~$8B acquiring $IRDM. Rocket Lab wants to own the network, spectrum and recurring revenue layer once satellites are in orbit which is why this deal is really about vertical integration as Neutron comes online. Once Rocket Lab can launch Iridium satellites on Neutron then it internalizes a cost that used to flow to third-party launch providers making the deal way more accretive over time as Neutron comes online. What I like is that Iridium also brings something Rocket Lab stack has lacked which is recurring, high-margin service revenue tied to global connectivity, direct-to-device and government communications. The space economy is splitting into companies that can launch and refresh their own networks and companies that have to rent access to orbit. $SPCX already proved which side wins because if you own both launch and the network then you control the cost structure, refresh cycle and margin stack in a way third-party launch customers cannot match. Launch gets you to orbit but connectivity is what you monetize once you're there and the companies that own both the launch layer and the network become the platforms of the space economy.

Shay Boloor

173,231 views • 1 month ago

☄️ The bright object seen over Kyiv may not have been a meteor, but part of Blue Origin’s New Glenn rocket During the recent launch, the first stage performed successfully — it was reused for the first time. However, the second stage encountered an anomaly during its second ignition. As a result, the BlueBird 7 satellite by AST SpaceMobile was placed into a lower-than-planned orbit and is expected to eventually re-enter and burn up in the atmosphere. The re-entry of the second stage is likely what caused the bright fiery trail seen in the sky over Kyiv.
0:25

☄️ The bright object seen over Kyiv may not have been a meteor, but part of Blue Origin’s New Glenn rocket During the recent launch, the first stage performed successfully — it was reused for the first time. However, the second stage encountered an anomaly during its second ignition. As a result, the BlueBird 7 satellite by AST SpaceMobile was placed into a lower-than-planned orbit and is expected to eventually re-enter and burn up in the atmosphere. The re-entry of the second stage is likely what caused the bright fiery trail seen in the sky over Kyiv.

NEXTA

33,253 views • 3 months ago

Artemis was a great test of going around the moon. However the Artemis rocket system has the same problem as the Apollo missions to the moon. It costs too much. The Artemis rocket, SLS, was designed by the US Senate. $4 billion per launch. And can only launch once each 2 years. We can’t build a moon base with this system. SLS was a rocket designed by politicians to create jobs for the old Space Shuttle contractors. They spent 15 years and $25 billion developing it, and it will never be cost effective at $4 billion per launch. It is an obsolete rocket already. It works, but it will eventually die due to budget cuts.
0:34

Artemis was a great test of going around the moon. However the Artemis rocket system has the same problem as the Apollo missions to the moon. It costs too much. The Artemis rocket, SLS, was designed by the US Senate. $4 billion per launch. And can only launch once each 2 years. We can’t build a moon base with this system. SLS was a rocket designed by politicians to create jobs for the old Space Shuttle contractors. They spent 15 years and $25 billion developing it, and it will never be cost effective at $4 billion per launch. It is an obsolete rocket already. It works, but it will eventually die due to budget cuts.

Wall Street Mav

58,630 views • 4 months ago

Starlink deployment is running ahead of its record-setting 2025 pace SpaceX deployed 1,589 Starlink satellites during the first half of 2026 That is 100 more than the 1,489 satellites deployed during the same period in 2025...a year that already set a new record Nearly 11,000 Starlink satellites are now functioning in orbit SpaceX is mass-producing orbital internet infrastructure at an unprecedented pace And with Starship preparing to carry next-generation V3 Starlink satellites, the next phase is going to be even bigger
0:30

Starlink deployment is running ahead of its record-setting 2025 pace SpaceX deployed 1,589 Starlink satellites during the first half of 2026 That is 100 more than the 1,489 satellites deployed during the same period in 2025...a year that already set a new record Nearly 11,000 Starlink satellites are now functioning in orbit SpaceX is mass-producing orbital internet infrastructure at an unprecedented pace And with Starship preparing to carry next-generation V3 Starlink satellites, the next phase is going to be even bigger

X Freeze

76,935 views • 26 days ago

Blue Origin New Glenn rocket launched for third time ever today (April 19) — but for the first time with previously flown hardware. Shortly after separation. the first stage of the rocket successfully landed on a droneship in the Atlantic Ocean. The mission, called NG-3, attempted to deliver BlueBird 7, a direct-to-cellphone internet satellite, to low Earth orbit but '"the payload was placed into an off-nominal orbit. We are currently assessing and will update when we have more detailed information," according to Blue Origin. NG-3 flew the same first-stage booster core that launched NG-2, but with new engines.
13:38

Blue Origin New Glenn rocket launched for third time ever today (April 19) — but for the first time with previously flown hardware. Shortly after separation. the first stage of the rocket successfully landed on a droneship in the Atlantic Ocean. The mission, called NG-3, attempted to deliver BlueBird 7, a direct-to-cellphone internet satellite, to low Earth orbit but '"the payload was placed into an off-nominal orbit. We are currently assessing and will update when we have more detailed information," according to Blue Origin. NG-3 flew the same first-stage booster core that launched NG-2, but with new engines.

liten drage

73,758 views • 3 months ago

A single gigawatt of orbital compute requires roughly 200 Starship launches and Elon Musk is not satisfied with gigawatts (Save this). The target is 100 gigawatts of orbital compute per year which means SpaceX is staring down a launch requirement that no organization in human history has ever attempted at anything close to that scale. He acknowledges that scaling to gigawatts per year in orbit is a very hard challenge, but then points to something most people have missed entirely, SpaceX has already demonstrated the foundational capability, because building and launching thousands of Starlink satellites per year is the same industrial problem applied to a different payload. When you understand the orbital compute satellite as a larger version of Starlink V3 with an Nvidia GPU rack at the center instead of a communications payload, the manufacturing and launch scaling challenge stops looking like science fiction and starts looking like a production ramp. The infrastructure to support that ramp is already being built. SpaceX is currently capacitizing for thousands of launches per year, two launch towers and pads in South Texas are operational, the first pad at Cape Canaveral is nearly complete, a second is on the way at Launch Complex 37, and additional locations are already in discussion. As the CFO says it "You need to have those cost curves as you ramp up in volume and time, your costs go down." The vision he describes for what this eventually enables is striking in its specificity. He imagines asking Grok a question on his phone, the inference running on an orbital compute satellite, and the answer coming back down through Starlink direct-to-cell, a complete AI query processed entirely in space, from prompt to response, without touching a single terrestrial data center. That moment, he says, is closer than the industry thinks, with initial capability demonstrations possible as soon as next year. The bottleneck that stands between now and that moment is not the satellite design, the cooling physics, or the silicon, all of which SpaceX has already worked through.
4:23

A single gigawatt of orbital compute requires roughly 200 Starship launches and Elon Musk is not satisfied with gigawatts (Save this). The target is 100 gigawatts of orbital compute per year which means SpaceX is staring down a launch requirement that no organization in human history has ever attempted at anything close to that scale. He acknowledges that scaling to gigawatts per year in orbit is a very hard challenge, but then points to something most people have missed entirely, SpaceX has already demonstrated the foundational capability, because building and launching thousands of Starlink satellites per year is the same industrial problem applied to a different payload. When you understand the orbital compute satellite as a larger version of Starlink V3 with an Nvidia GPU rack at the center instead of a communications payload, the manufacturing and launch scaling challenge stops looking like science fiction and starts looking like a production ramp. The infrastructure to support that ramp is already being built. SpaceX is currently capacitizing for thousands of launches per year, two launch towers and pads in South Texas are operational, the first pad at Cape Canaveral is nearly complete, a second is on the way at Launch Complex 37, and additional locations are already in discussion. As the CFO says it "You need to have those cost curves as you ramp up in volume and time, your costs go down." The vision he describes for what this eventually enables is striking in its specificity. He imagines asking Grok a question on his phone, the inference running on an orbital compute satellite, and the answer coming back down through Starlink direct-to-cell, a complete AI query processed entirely in space, from prompt to response, without touching a single terrestrial data center. That moment, he says, is closer than the industry thinks, with initial capability demonstrations possible as soon as next year. The bottleneck that stands between now and that moment is not the satellite design, the cooling physics, or the silicon, all of which SpaceX has already worked through.

Milk Road AI

67,868 views • 2 months ago

A rocket damaged the only launch pad at Baikonur. The launch of the Soyuz 2.1a rocket carrying the Soyuz MS 28 spacecraft proceeded smoothly. The crew entered orbit and successfully docked with the ISS. However, damage to launch pad components was discovered on the pad. The lower retractable service cabin failed to retract into its protective niche and fell into the gas chute. Roscosmos stated that spare parts are available and repairs will begin quickly. If sufficient components are available, repairs could take approximately six months. This poses a problem because this pad at Baikonur is currently the only one capable of launching manned and cargo Soyuz spacecraft to the ISS. The launch of Progress MS 33 is scheduled for December 21, 2025, and another Soyuz is planned for next year. Meanwhile, Vostochny is not yet ready, Plesetsk is not in the trajectory, and Baikonur Pad 1 is mothballed.
0:26

A rocket damaged the only launch pad at Baikonur. The launch of the Soyuz 2.1a rocket carrying the Soyuz MS 28 spacecraft proceeded smoothly. The crew entered orbit and successfully docked with the ISS. However, damage to launch pad components was discovered on the pad. The lower retractable service cabin failed to retract into its protective niche and fell into the gas chute. Roscosmos stated that spare parts are available and repairs will begin quickly. If sufficient components are available, repairs could take approximately six months. This poses a problem because this pad at Baikonur is currently the only one capable of launching manned and cargo Soyuz spacecraft to the ISS. The launch of Progress MS 33 is scheduled for December 21, 2025, and another Soyuz is planned for next year. Meanwhile, Vostochny is not yet ready, Plesetsk is not in the trajectory, and Baikonur Pad 1 is mothballed.

Black Hole

101,048 views • 8 months ago

A Blue Origin rocket exploded during a "hotfire test" at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station on Thursday night. Everyone has been accounted for and is safe, Jeff Bezos, the company's founder, said. NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman said he was aware of the incident, which he called an "anomaly," and the agency would provide information on any impacts to Artemis or Moon Base programs. "Spaceflight is unforgiving, and developing new heavy-lift launch capability is extraordinarily difficult. We will work with our partners to support a thorough investigation of this anomaly, assess near-term mission impacts, and get back to launching rockets," he said.
0:30

A Blue Origin rocket exploded during a "hotfire test" at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station on Thursday night. Everyone has been accounted for and is safe, Jeff Bezos, the company's founder, said. NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman said he was aware of the incident, which he called an "anomaly," and the agency would provide information on any impacts to Artemis or Moon Base programs. "Spaceflight is unforgiving, and developing new heavy-lift launch capability is extraordinarily difficult. We will work with our partners to support a thorough investigation of this anomaly, assess near-term mission impacts, and get back to launching rockets," he said.

Fox News

174,678 views • 2 months ago

$RKLB New Peter Beck interview today on Bloomberg: Does SpaceX's dominance threaten Rocket Lab? "No, I don't think so. The reality is SpaceX is a space company, but also very much an AI company and a bunch of other things as well. Rocket Lab is a very squarely focused pure play space company. I think it draws investors into the sector. And when they go looking, Rocket Lab is really the clear number two with respect to launch frequency and those kinds of things. So no, I'm not too worried about that.” "So do you find yourself complementary to SpaceX? Or are you in direct competition with Elon Musk?" "In some cases we are in direct competition, but also very complementary. We are an end-to-end space company. We're the second most frequently launched US rocket in the world behind SpaceX, so the rocket bit is competitive. But two-thirds of our business is building satellites and spacecraft and supplying components to the rest of the space industry. So in that sense, not really a competitor at all."
1:13

$RKLB New Peter Beck interview today on Bloomberg: Does SpaceX's dominance threaten Rocket Lab? "No, I don't think so. The reality is SpaceX is a space company, but also very much an AI company and a bunch of other things as well. Rocket Lab is a very squarely focused pure play space company. I think it draws investors into the sector. And when they go looking, Rocket Lab is really the clear number two with respect to launch frequency and those kinds of things. So no, I'm not too worried about that.” "So do you find yourself complementary to SpaceX? Or are you in direct competition with Elon Musk?" "In some cases we are in direct competition, but also very complementary. We are an end-to-end space company. We're the second most frequently launched US rocket in the world behind SpaceX, so the rocket bit is competitive. But two-thirds of our business is building satellites and spacecraft and supplying components to the rest of the space industry. So in that sense, not really a competitor at all."

ValueOverPrice

51,421 views • 1 month ago