Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🚨 MIND-BLOWING EXPOSÉ: THIS IS EXACTLY HOW THE DEEP STATE ASSASSINATED CHARLIE KIRK – STEP BY BLOODY STEP! Picture the nightmare: A shadowy US MILITARY SPY PLANE – call it the SIGNAL STEALER – buzzes low over the rally, unleashing pure ELECTRONIC WARFARE CHAOS! Jamming Wi-Fi, hijacking cell signals,...

ProjectConstitu's profile picture

Project Constitution

292,565 subscribers

290,804 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & PolitikaKomedi
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

🚨EXCLUSIVE: Mikey McCoy Caught POINTING UP AT THE ROOF Before Charlie Was Shot At UVU— NOT ONCE BUT TWICE! 😱 You NEED to see this. In this clip, during Charlie's FIRST debate Q&A... watch TPUSA Chief of Staff Michael McCoy points UP toward the ROOF (left of Charlie) – NOT ONCE, but TWICE. Minutes before the shot rings out. Captured from Charlie's LEFT SIDE – right next to the tent in that shadowy BLIND SPOT with few other videos captured that day. What. Is. He. Pointing. At? 🤔 Even more chilling: RIGHT AFTER the shot, Mikey turns his BACK on Charlie (instead of rushing to help), casually strolls behind the tent, and dips OUT of the venue... ON HIS PHONE. Zero panic. Like he KNEW it was just ONE shot. No active shooter chaos. Mikey? Hasn't said a word. TPUSA? Addressed it on The Charlie Kirk Show... and got CAUGHT LYING. FBI says the shot came from a ROOF. So... this feels kinda relevant, right? No accusations – just TRANSPARENCY. What stands out to you? Timestamps? Movements? Inconsistencies with that day's statements? We're SHAKING THE TREE for leads, patriots. Your eyes could CRACK this WIDE OPEN. Drop comments BELOW – let's dissect EVERY frame. RT and TAG Candace Owens
2:09

🚨EXCLUSIVE: Mikey McCoy Caught POINTING UP AT THE ROOF Before Charlie Was Shot At UVU— NOT ONCE BUT TWICE! 😱 You NEED to see this. In this clip, during Charlie's FIRST debate Q&A... watch TPUSA Chief of Staff Michael McCoy points UP toward the ROOF (left of Charlie) – NOT ONCE, but TWICE. Minutes before the shot rings out. Captured from Charlie's LEFT SIDE – right next to the tent in that shadowy BLIND SPOT with few other videos captured that day. What. Is. He. Pointing. At? 🤔 Even more chilling: RIGHT AFTER the shot, Mikey turns his BACK on Charlie (instead of rushing to help), casually strolls behind the tent, and dips OUT of the venue... ON HIS PHONE. Zero panic. Like he KNEW it was just ONE shot. No active shooter chaos. Mikey? Hasn't said a word. TPUSA? Addressed it on The Charlie Kirk Show... and got CAUGHT LYING. FBI says the shot came from a ROOF. So... this feels kinda relevant, right? No accusations – just TRANSPARENCY. What stands out to you? Timestamps? Movements? Inconsistencies with that day's statements? We're SHAKING THE TREE for leads, patriots. Your eyes could CRACK this WIDE OPEN. Drop comments BELOW – let's dissect EVERY frame. RT and TAG Candace Owens

Project Constitution

279,114 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

🚨 BREAKING: UNDENIABLE PROOF OF MULTIPLE SHOOTERS IN CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION! 😱Assassins Sync Shots to Kill Charlie—This Changes EVERYTHING! 👀 You thought it was just one sniper? WRONG. Frame-by-frame analysis shows Charlie was HIT FROM BOTH SIDES—back of the head by the BA roof sniper (I ID'd the shooter in my last vid), and CENTER-MASS CHEST SHOT FROM THE FRONT by a PALM GUN in the crowd! Meet SUSPECT #2: "Aviator Sunglasses Guy" Rick Cutler—Charlie's own SECURITY! Watch him "adjust his sleeve" (already rolled up to his bicep??) right as the shots ring out. Barrel peeks between his fingers, BULLET VISIBLE MID-AIR from his palm! Squeeze, recoil, BOOM—Charlie's shirt puffs out from the impact. Instant kill. No chance. They synced the shots to sound like ONE. But we see it: Neck expands from rear hit, then FRONT SHOT ripples the shirt EXACTLY where the heart is. You can see the hole in Charlie's shirt from the projectile. Mic didn't explode—it's still there. Earpiece/Necklace flew, not blood. Eyewitness CORROBORATES: "Direct shot to the heart—shirt went red, fell back." Crowd drops like dominoes, no trampling. This isn't delusion—it's RIGHT THERE. Look up "palm gun." Who's covering this up? Share it out to get JUSTICE FOR CHARLIE!! 🕵️‍♂️
7:46

🚨 BREAKING: UNDENIABLE PROOF OF MULTIPLE SHOOTERS IN CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION! 😱Assassins Sync Shots to Kill Charlie—This Changes EVERYTHING! 👀 You thought it was just one sniper? WRONG. Frame-by-frame analysis shows Charlie was HIT FROM BOTH SIDES—back of the head by the BA roof sniper (I ID'd the shooter in my last vid), and CENTER-MASS CHEST SHOT FROM THE FRONT by a PALM GUN in the crowd! Meet SUSPECT #2: "Aviator Sunglasses Guy" Rick Cutler—Charlie's own SECURITY! Watch him "adjust his sleeve" (already rolled up to his bicep??) right as the shots ring out. Barrel peeks between his fingers, BULLET VISIBLE MID-AIR from his palm! Squeeze, recoil, BOOM—Charlie's shirt puffs out from the impact. Instant kill. No chance. They synced the shots to sound like ONE. But we see it: Neck expands from rear hit, then FRONT SHOT ripples the shirt EXACTLY where the heart is. You can see the hole in Charlie's shirt from the projectile. Mic didn't explode—it's still there. Earpiece/Necklace flew, not blood. Eyewitness CORROBORATES: "Direct shot to the heart—shirt went red, fell back." Crowd drops like dominoes, no trampling. This isn't delusion—it's RIGHT THERE. Look up "palm gun." Who's covering this up? Share it out to get JUSTICE FOR CHARLIE!! 🕵️‍♂️

Project Constitution

184,199 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

🚨BREAKING NEWS: The REAL Charlie Kirk Killer CAUGHT on Camera Running Away, Not Tyler! —TRUE Assassin SPOTTED Fleeing Roof I know it's long but trust me you want to watch it in full, it includes airtight evidence that this is the main shooter. After 100s of hours digging—muzzle flash, IR beam, bullet trajectory, sound mapping—it's SOLVED. Not Tyler Robinson's lone wolf BS from 150yds. This was OPERATION 332: 3 patsies (Tyler, cell phone gun guy, pistol patsy, t), 3 shooters (BA sniper + palm shooter from his OWN SECURITY, and tent remote fired gun), 2 distractions (George Zen & Phil Lyman). The BA SNIPER? That stocky dude in cargo pants, thick shirt, reflective shades—running GUILTY across the bridge 23 secs post-shot. Dropped from the admin building roof, fired the kill shot to Kirk's neck, then bolted like hell. Palm shooter hit center mass for the "front" cover-up. Inside job, pros only. State actors? You connect the dots. WHO IS THIS GUY? Screenshot, download, SHARE EVERYWHERE. Tag @CharlieKirkTPUSA, Donald J. Trump, FBI, Candace Owens —demand answers! He's out there. We expose him NOW. [Image: Blurry still of stocky man mid-run on bridge, glasses/glasses, beard? Cargo pants visible —clearer image in comments below to circulate!] RT if you're with us—humanity over handlers! 👊
21:30

🚨BREAKING NEWS: The REAL Charlie Kirk Killer CAUGHT on Camera Running Away, Not Tyler! —TRUE Assassin SPOTTED Fleeing Roof I know it's long but trust me you want to watch it in full, it includes airtight evidence that this is the main shooter. After 100s of hours digging—muzzle flash, IR beam, bullet trajectory, sound mapping—it's SOLVED. Not Tyler Robinson's lone wolf BS from 150yds. This was OPERATION 332: 3 patsies (Tyler, cell phone gun guy, pistol patsy, t), 3 shooters (BA sniper + palm shooter from his OWN SECURITY, and tent remote fired gun), 2 distractions (George Zen & Phil Lyman). The BA SNIPER? That stocky dude in cargo pants, thick shirt, reflective shades—running GUILTY across the bridge 23 secs post-shot. Dropped from the admin building roof, fired the kill shot to Kirk's neck, then bolted like hell. Palm shooter hit center mass for the "front" cover-up. Inside job, pros only. State actors? You connect the dots. WHO IS THIS GUY? Screenshot, download, SHARE EVERYWHERE. Tag @CharlieKirkTPUSA, Donald J. Trump, FBI, Candace Owens —demand answers! He's out there. We expose him NOW. [Image: Blurry still of stocky man mid-run on bridge, glasses/glasses, beard? Cargo pants visible —clearer image in comments below to circulate!] RT if you're with us—humanity over handlers! 👊

Project Constitution

781,129 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

🚨 BREAKING: NEW Video From CHARLIE KIRK SHOOTING—Cop's Find DROPPED HANDGUN On The Left Side Of The Crowd! THIS BLOWS THE OFFICIAL NARRATIVE TO HELL! Brand new footage just dropped from the moments AFTER the Charlie Kirk was hit at UVU. Watch as POLICE OFFICERS swarm the LEFT SIDE OF THE STAGE (from Charlie's chair view, staring out at the crowd) and scoop up a GLISTENING HANDGUN right off the ground. Someone DROPPED IT AND BOLTED after the shot rang out! 😱 This SLAMS the door on that BS "lone sniper from Losee Building" fairy tale. Remember my post a few days ago? Eyewitness buddy sent me pics of POLICE EVIDENCE MARKERS & FLAGS littered across THAT EXACT LEFT FLANK of the crowd—nowhere near the "official" rooftop perch the FBI claim. I was like, "WTF are they tagging over THERE if the shot came straight-on?!" BOOM—now it CLICKS. They FOUND A close-range HANDGUN, ditched in panic by a shooter blending with the audience. Coordinated hit? Cover-up in overdrive? This ties straight into the TPUSA betrayals, shady vans, and that Israeli IP scouting we exposed. FBI MUST EXPLAIN THIS on camera!! Drop everything and WATCH the clip below. RT like your First Amendment depends on it (cuz it does). Who's got more angles? Tag Candace Owens , and other truth-seekers alike —Charlie's ghost demands JUSTICE! 👻
0:22

🚨 BREAKING: NEW Video From CHARLIE KIRK SHOOTING—Cop's Find DROPPED HANDGUN On The Left Side Of The Crowd! THIS BLOWS THE OFFICIAL NARRATIVE TO HELL! Brand new footage just dropped from the moments AFTER the Charlie Kirk was hit at UVU. Watch as POLICE OFFICERS swarm the LEFT SIDE OF THE STAGE (from Charlie's chair view, staring out at the crowd) and scoop up a GLISTENING HANDGUN right off the ground. Someone DROPPED IT AND BOLTED after the shot rang out! 😱 This SLAMS the door on that BS "lone sniper from Losee Building" fairy tale. Remember my post a few days ago? Eyewitness buddy sent me pics of POLICE EVIDENCE MARKERS & FLAGS littered across THAT EXACT LEFT FLANK of the crowd—nowhere near the "official" rooftop perch the FBI claim. I was like, "WTF are they tagging over THERE if the shot came straight-on?!" BOOM—now it CLICKS. They FOUND A close-range HANDGUN, ditched in panic by a shooter blending with the audience. Coordinated hit? Cover-up in overdrive? This ties straight into the TPUSA betrayals, shady vans, and that Israeli IP scouting we exposed. FBI MUST EXPLAIN THIS on camera!! Drop everything and WATCH the clip below. RT like your First Amendment depends on it (cuz it does). Who's got more angles? Tag Candace Owens , and other truth-seekers alike —Charlie's ghost demands JUSTICE! 👻

Project Constitution

798,219 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

🧵 PART 2: PHYSICS PROVES THE TRUTH – Shooter on BA Building Roof, NOT Losee! FBI LYING to Frame Innocent Tyler Robinson! Remember Part 1? We color-analyzed the CRIMSON BLOOD pooling in Charlie Kirk's RIGHT EAR CANAL – matching the exit wound on his LEFT NECK. Entry confirmed. Now, physics seals it. Using ECHOLOCATION SOUND ANALYSIS (like bats triangulate prey), Gideon's team pinpointed the exact shooter's location on the BA BUILDING ROOF. Every phone has 2 microphones; So by using both stereo mics on the video it show sound waves hitting BOTH channels SIMULTANEOUSLY – this tells us the shooters direction: DEAD AT BA CORNER. Irrefutable! No way from the sound came from the Losee Bldg. Trajectory? The bullet's trajectory is EXACTLY 8.4° OFF HIS BACK (3 O'CLOCK), 22° ELEVATION. The Bullet Entered through his RIGHT EAR CANAL, EXITED out his NECK. Gideon's 3D model plots it PERFECTLY. That "flash"? NOT a muzzle flash – it's a VAPOR CLOUD as the bullet drops SUPERSONIC → SUBSONIC. Triangulated via reflections/windows/pink backpack that LINES UP EXACTLY on BA trajectory. 🔴IR laser on Frank Turek's phone? FROM BA sniper. 🔴Bullet captured mid-air on video? FROM BA sniper potion. 🔴Suspicious guy RUNNING post-shot? FROM BA sniper position. 🔴 Witnesses turning their heads to the left? towards towards the BA building. All eyes there IMMEDIATELY. Tyler? 100% a PATSY. Involved? Maybe. Shooter? IMPOSSIBLE – physics says NO. The shot was not taken from the Losee Bldg. FBI: Must DROP THE CASE! He's innocent – you're railroading a kid for the DEEP STATE? Gideon’s FULL SOUND ANALYSIS drops soon: Proving 2+ shooters via echoes/building reflections. MORE locations via physics. Follow & 🔔 ON – truth incoming! – This is IRREFUTABLE. Free Tyler NOW! TAG Candace Owens FBI and RT to SPREAD THE WORD! Who's with us? 🔥 Special Shoutout to My Guest WeAreNotGoingToMars and Gideon Jacobs also special thanks to Audio:Freq Studios who work with Gideon as a team to put together the Sound analysis for us pinpointing the location of the shooter. Please go FOLLOW all these guys as they are doing tremendous work on the CK case. Lastly Be sure to checkout PART 1 which is attached below this one for the whole perspective. 👇
47:25

🧵 PART 2: PHYSICS PROVES THE TRUTH – Shooter on BA Building Roof, NOT Losee! FBI LYING to Frame Innocent Tyler Robinson! Remember Part 1? We color-analyzed the CRIMSON BLOOD pooling in Charlie Kirk's RIGHT EAR CANAL – matching the exit wound on his LEFT NECK. Entry confirmed. Now, physics seals it. Using ECHOLOCATION SOUND ANALYSIS (like bats triangulate prey), Gideon's team pinpointed the exact shooter's location on the BA BUILDING ROOF. Every phone has 2 microphones; So by using both stereo mics on the video it show sound waves hitting BOTH channels SIMULTANEOUSLY – this tells us the shooters direction: DEAD AT BA CORNER. Irrefutable! No way from the sound came from the Losee Bldg. Trajectory? The bullet's trajectory is EXACTLY 8.4° OFF HIS BACK (3 O'CLOCK), 22° ELEVATION. The Bullet Entered through his RIGHT EAR CANAL, EXITED out his NECK. Gideon's 3D model plots it PERFECTLY. That "flash"? NOT a muzzle flash – it's a VAPOR CLOUD as the bullet drops SUPERSONIC → SUBSONIC. Triangulated via reflections/windows/pink backpack that LINES UP EXACTLY on BA trajectory. 🔴IR laser on Frank Turek's phone? FROM BA sniper. 🔴Bullet captured mid-air on video? FROM BA sniper potion. 🔴Suspicious guy RUNNING post-shot? FROM BA sniper position. 🔴 Witnesses turning their heads to the left? towards towards the BA building. All eyes there IMMEDIATELY. Tyler? 100% a PATSY. Involved? Maybe. Shooter? IMPOSSIBLE – physics says NO. The shot was not taken from the Losee Bldg. FBI: Must DROP THE CASE! He's innocent – you're railroading a kid for the DEEP STATE? Gideon’s FULL SOUND ANALYSIS drops soon: Proving 2+ shooters via echoes/building reflections. MORE locations via physics. Follow & 🔔 ON – truth incoming! – This is IRREFUTABLE. Free Tyler NOW! TAG Candace Owens FBI and RT to SPREAD THE WORD! Who's with us? 🔥 Special Shoutout to My Guest WeAreNotGoingToMars and Gideon Jacobs also special thanks to Audio:Freq Studios who work with Gideon as a team to put together the Sound analysis for us pinpointing the location of the shooter. Please go FOLLOW all these guys as they are doing tremendous work on the CK case. Lastly Be sure to checkout PART 1 which is attached below this one for the whole perspective. 👇

Project Constitution

64,492 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

🚨BOMBSHELL EYEWITNESS VIDEO: Feet From CHARLIE KIRK'S FATAL SHOT—His Account PERFECTLY Backs My THEORY OF A REMOTE-TRIGGERED HIT From Inside The TENT! Watch this raw testimony: At 12:10 PM UVU rally—zero security, no checks, hats flying as crowd cheers Charlie. Q&A dives into GUNS (foreshadowing?). Then ONE razor-sharp BANG—like a firecracker, but he LOCKS EYES ON CHARLIE'S HEAD SNAPPING BACK in blood. Instant kill. Thought: "Staged?!" Dead silence, then frenzy—crowd drops, surges to back exit for safety. He's inches away (snags the hat mid-air). Scans BELOW HIM to the right (audience section)—sound PUNCHES UPWARD, direct to his ears. No echo in the diffused plaza bowl (crowd/clothes absorb it like a sound trap). Felt it RISE—rules out roof/balcony (canopy blocks view/angle). Eye-level trajectory. No ricochet, no external noise. Outside: George Zen (broke, devout LDS loner—NO gun) cuffed FAST by plainclothes cops. Obvious patsy. Low-key event: 2-3 black-shirt "guards," sketchy audio (tinny Q&A mics vs. Charlie's clear). Witness floats remote speaker rig—close, but here's where it SNAPS INTO MY THEORY BELOW! 👇 That upward shot? From a concealed remote device at the TOP INSIDE THE TENT/CANOPY—perfect line past the cover, triggered wirelessly for precision. Mic blasts the pop through speakers. No visible shooter, crowd chaos covers escape. This eyewitness NAILS it: Direction, acoustics, staging vibes—ALL point to internal tent tech, not audience chaos. Demand: Forensics on tent fixtures NOW before teardown. Who planted it? RT to force the probe!
14:45

🚨BOMBSHELL EYEWITNESS VIDEO: Feet From CHARLIE KIRK'S FATAL SHOT—His Account PERFECTLY Backs My THEORY OF A REMOTE-TRIGGERED HIT From Inside The TENT! Watch this raw testimony: At 12:10 PM UVU rally—zero security, no checks, hats flying as crowd cheers Charlie. Q&A dives into GUNS (foreshadowing?). Then ONE razor-sharp BANG—like a firecracker, but he LOCKS EYES ON CHARLIE'S HEAD SNAPPING BACK in blood. Instant kill. Thought: "Staged?!" Dead silence, then frenzy—crowd drops, surges to back exit for safety. He's inches away (snags the hat mid-air). Scans BELOW HIM to the right (audience section)—sound PUNCHES UPWARD, direct to his ears. No echo in the diffused plaza bowl (crowd/clothes absorb it like a sound trap). Felt it RISE—rules out roof/balcony (canopy blocks view/angle). Eye-level trajectory. No ricochet, no external noise. Outside: George Zen (broke, devout LDS loner—NO gun) cuffed FAST by plainclothes cops. Obvious patsy. Low-key event: 2-3 black-shirt "guards," sketchy audio (tinny Q&A mics vs. Charlie's clear). Witness floats remote speaker rig—close, but here's where it SNAPS INTO MY THEORY BELOW! 👇 That upward shot? From a concealed remote device at the TOP INSIDE THE TENT/CANOPY—perfect line past the cover, triggered wirelessly for precision. Mic blasts the pop through speakers. No visible shooter, crowd chaos covers escape. This eyewitness NAILS it: Direction, acoustics, staging vibes—ALL point to internal tent tech, not audience chaos. Demand: Forensics on tent fixtures NOW before teardown. Who planted it? RT to force the probe!

Project Constitution

477,104 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

🚨ALERT: Kash Patel Dodges KEY QUESTION About Charlie Kirk’s Shooter —They Say DNA Was on a Towel… But NOT the MURDER WEAPON? Something’s Off. Why are we being shown grainy Bigfoot footage of the alleged shooter but ZERO clear shots of him carrying a rifle? Why is Kash Patel dodging the one question we all want answered — where’s the footage, the rifle, the ballistics? We’re told DNA was found on a towel and a screwdriver on the roof — but nothing on the rifle allegedly used to kill Charlie Kirk. No ballistics. No proof linking that gun to that shot. No witnesses. No confession. Even his family says it’s not him. How would a random student know the roof layout, plan the perfect sniper spot, fire the shot, and disappear? This feels way bigger — and way darker — than what we’re being told. We’re drowning in cameras, yet somehow the clearest evidence never makes it out. Show the receipts. Stop hiding behind talking points. Go checkout the full video from Black Scout Survival I'll drop the link in the comments below. Make sure to FOLLOW him on X and SUBSCRIBE to him on YouTube. This isn’t left vs. right. This is truth vs. cover‑up.
6:35

🚨ALERT: Kash Patel Dodges KEY QUESTION About Charlie Kirk’s Shooter —They Say DNA Was on a Towel… But NOT the MURDER WEAPON? Something’s Off. Why are we being shown grainy Bigfoot footage of the alleged shooter but ZERO clear shots of him carrying a rifle? Why is Kash Patel dodging the one question we all want answered — where’s the footage, the rifle, the ballistics? We’re told DNA was found on a towel and a screwdriver on the roof — but nothing on the rifle allegedly used to kill Charlie Kirk. No ballistics. No proof linking that gun to that shot. No witnesses. No confession. Even his family says it’s not him. How would a random student know the roof layout, plan the perfect sniper spot, fire the shot, and disappear? This feels way bigger — and way darker — than what we’re being told. We’re drowning in cameras, yet somehow the clearest evidence never makes it out. Show the receipts. Stop hiding behind talking points. Go checkout the full video from Black Scout Survival I'll drop the link in the comments below. Make sure to FOLLOW him on X and SUBSCRIBE to him on YouTube. This isn’t left vs. right. This is truth vs. cover‑up.

Project Constitution

162,145 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

🚨MYSTERIOUS: If Kirk Was REALLY SHOT From the Losee Bldg. Then… Why Were There Cops ALL OVER The Roof of the WOODBURY Bldg?🕵️‍♂️ Check this: Video & image show cops avoiding the edge/corner while leaning across Kirk’s 4 for a better view. They carefully circle around that spot, clearly trying to see something without stepping on it. One cop even points forward like he sees exactly what he’s looking for. Seriously… cops encircling an area on the Woodbury rooftop like they’re following a trail. Notice the guy in the blue shirt: Leaning, trying to spot something in front, But not stepping on the corner that would give him the view he wants. He walks around “something,” and it’s obvious the corner was observed because it’s not being contaminated. Map time: Green circles = Losee sniper nest & Kirk Pink circle = Woodbury building 👀 Something about this just doesn’t add up… and it’s got me thinking: What were they really looking at? 💬 Drop your theories. Am I missing something obvious—or is this as strange as it looks?
1:10

🚨MYSTERIOUS: If Kirk Was REALLY SHOT From the Losee Bldg. Then… Why Were There Cops ALL OVER The Roof of the WOODBURY Bldg?🕵️‍♂️ Check this: Video & image show cops avoiding the edge/corner while leaning across Kirk’s 4 for a better view. They carefully circle around that spot, clearly trying to see something without stepping on it. One cop even points forward like he sees exactly what he’s looking for. Seriously… cops encircling an area on the Woodbury rooftop like they’re following a trail. Notice the guy in the blue shirt: Leaning, trying to spot something in front, But not stepping on the corner that would give him the view he wants. He walks around “something,” and it’s obvious the corner was observed because it’s not being contaminated. Map time: Green circles = Losee sniper nest & Kirk Pink circle = Woodbury building 👀 Something about this just doesn’t add up… and it’s got me thinking: What were they really looking at? 💬 Drop your theories. Am I missing something obvious—or is this as strange as it looks?

Project Constitution

782,172 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

🚨 BOMBSHELL EXPOSÉ: Pastor Rob McCoy CAUGHT LYING About His Son's "Heroic" Actions After Charlie Kirk's Assassination!😡 In a fiery Sunday sermon, Pastor Rob McCoy painted a heroic picture of his 24-year-old son, Mikey McCoy—Charlie Kirk's personal chef, chief of staff, and supposed best friend who was right by his side at UVU on that fateful day. Rob claimed: "The minute Charlie was shot, he called me... 'Dad, Charlie's been shot in the neck. Please call every pastor and pray.' ... He had wits about him, he was just directing, he had blood all over him... Still there, phone in his hand, texting, talking." But here's the gut-wrenching TRUTH—we have crystal-clear VIDEO PROOF that shatters this fairy tale to pieces. Watch as Mikey stands just feet from Charlie at the edge of the tent when the shot rings out. Instead of rushing to help his "dying friend," Mikey slowly and casually turns his back on Charlie, walks away behind the tent, pulls out his phone, and makes a call. He strolls all the way past the road, far from the chaos, showing zero panic, zero urgency, zero care for Charlie bleeding out. No sprinting to aid. No blood on his clothes from trying to save a life. No leadership—just cold abandonment. Mikey, who spent the morning loyally filming everything by Charlie's side, suddenly ghosts the scene like a coward. Shock? Or something far more sinister? He walks away cool, calm, and collected... as if he KNEW the shot was coming. Pastor Rob's lies aren't just heartbreaking—they're a blatant cover-up for betrayal in the wake of Charlie Kirk's murder. Was Mikey complicit? Why ditch your best friend in his final moments for a phone call? This stinks of deep deception, and the McCoys owe America answers. Demand justice! SHARE this far and wide to expose the fraud —get this on every feed! Who's got the guts to grill Pastor Rob on camera? The truth about Charlie's death can't be buried under sermons.
2:21

🚨 BOMBSHELL EXPOSÉ: Pastor Rob McCoy CAUGHT LYING About His Son's "Heroic" Actions After Charlie Kirk's Assassination!😡 In a fiery Sunday sermon, Pastor Rob McCoy painted a heroic picture of his 24-year-old son, Mikey McCoy—Charlie Kirk's personal chef, chief of staff, and supposed best friend who was right by his side at UVU on that fateful day. Rob claimed: "The minute Charlie was shot, he called me... 'Dad, Charlie's been shot in the neck. Please call every pastor and pray.' ... He had wits about him, he was just directing, he had blood all over him... Still there, phone in his hand, texting, talking." But here's the gut-wrenching TRUTH—we have crystal-clear VIDEO PROOF that shatters this fairy tale to pieces. Watch as Mikey stands just feet from Charlie at the edge of the tent when the shot rings out. Instead of rushing to help his "dying friend," Mikey slowly and casually turns his back on Charlie, walks away behind the tent, pulls out his phone, and makes a call. He strolls all the way past the road, far from the chaos, showing zero panic, zero urgency, zero care for Charlie bleeding out. No sprinting to aid. No blood on his clothes from trying to save a life. No leadership—just cold abandonment. Mikey, who spent the morning loyally filming everything by Charlie's side, suddenly ghosts the scene like a coward. Shock? Or something far more sinister? He walks away cool, calm, and collected... as if he KNEW the shot was coming. Pastor Rob's lies aren't just heartbreaking—they're a blatant cover-up for betrayal in the wake of Charlie Kirk's murder. Was Mikey complicit? Why ditch your best friend in his final moments for a phone call? This stinks of deep deception, and the McCoys owe America answers. Demand justice! SHARE this far and wide to expose the fraud —get this on every feed! Who's got the guts to grill Pastor Rob on camera? The truth about Charlie's death can't be buried under sermons.

Project Constitution

5,179,803 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

🚨 EYEWITNESS DROPS NUCLEAR CONFIRMATION: Charlie Kirk SHOT POINT-BLANK in the CHEST – TWO SHOOTERS PROVEN! A front-row eyewitness—standing RIGHT IN FRONT of Charlie Kirk on his RIGHT SIDE— just shattered the official "single shooter from behind" BS. This guy's account? Straight fire. He watched in HORROR as Kirk took a DEADLY STRETCH SHOT STRAIGHT TO THE HEART and the Wound BLEEDS Through Shirt. His words: "Like, it was a stretch shot to the heart. And look right, right where his heart is. It started going red. He fell back and went to his side. Then I look down at the crowd. And look like the crowd all went to the knees really fast." Crowd DROPS like dominoes—no trampling, no chaos from a "lone gunman" scramble. Eyewitness hit the deck too: "I, kind of, did go to my knees as fast everybody, cause I wanted to see if anyone who was close to the shooter would be trampling all over that person. And I saw nothing like that at all... They were just not moving." Then? Panic pushes him backstage. Blood SOAKING his shirt from the CHEST— not just neck. This lines up PERFECTLY with the palm gun shooter we've been screaming about. TWO SHOOTERS: One from behind (neck?), one from FRONT (heart-piercing kill shot). Cover-up much? Official story crumbling FAST. Who silenced Kirk? Deep State? Foreign ops? Drop your takes BELOW— this is the thread that pulls it all together!
0:34

🚨 EYEWITNESS DROPS NUCLEAR CONFIRMATION: Charlie Kirk SHOT POINT-BLANK in the CHEST – TWO SHOOTERS PROVEN! A front-row eyewitness—standing RIGHT IN FRONT of Charlie Kirk on his RIGHT SIDE— just shattered the official "single shooter from behind" BS. This guy's account? Straight fire. He watched in HORROR as Kirk took a DEADLY STRETCH SHOT STRAIGHT TO THE HEART and the Wound BLEEDS Through Shirt. His words: "Like, it was a stretch shot to the heart. And look right, right where his heart is. It started going red. He fell back and went to his side. Then I look down at the crowd. And look like the crowd all went to the knees really fast." Crowd DROPS like dominoes—no trampling, no chaos from a "lone gunman" scramble. Eyewitness hit the deck too: "I, kind of, did go to my knees as fast everybody, cause I wanted to see if anyone who was close to the shooter would be trampling all over that person. And I saw nothing like that at all... They were just not moving." Then? Panic pushes him backstage. Blood SOAKING his shirt from the CHEST— not just neck. This lines up PERFECTLY with the palm gun shooter we've been screaming about. TWO SHOOTERS: One from behind (neck?), one from FRONT (heart-piercing kill shot). Cover-up much? Official story crumbling FAST. Who silenced Kirk? Deep State? Foreign ops? Drop your takes BELOW— this is the thread that pulls it all together!

Project Constitution

52,867 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

BREAKING DOWN the FACTS and ODD occurrences about the Charlie Kirk assassination. - Why does NOBODY seem to help or attend to Charlie's wound and WHY does NOBODY have any BLOOD on their hands? Why aren't they packing the wound? - There is NO WAY it was a .30-06 or a SOFT-TIP .30-06 round. NONE of that would even matter with the amount of power and FPS behind a .30-06 round. A soft-tip round would actually create an even bigger EXIT WOUND than a standard FMJ (Full Metal Jacket) round. BUT... We DIDN'T even get an EXIT WOUND at all, unless the hole we see is the exit wound. Even at a 9 degree angle, shooting from the roof position, a .30-06 would of 100% went RIGHT THROUGH Charlie's neck. Maybe even worse. There is NO WAY the bullet would deflect and go STRAIGHT DOWN after hitting his spine or neck bones. It would of CONTINUED DIRECTLY THROUGH. - Where is the RIFLE in the pictures of him on the steps? There is no visible RIFLE in his pant legs, and it WOULD not fit in that backpack especial with the barrel being 2 ft long itself even broken down, and especially the stock/butt of the gun and the scope fit into a pair of skinny jeans. HOW did Tyler get the RIFLE ON THE ROOF? - Why don't we have more footage, ESPECIALLY of when he took the shot or just with the RIFLE in his hands at ANY POINT? Why does the video start with him running? Nothing makes sense and now with all the new footage of Tyler at the gas station and all these other places and an alleged WOMAN that was seen with the shooter, it makes even less sense, with even more questions. cc: Alex Jones, Owen Benjamin
8:57

BREAKING DOWN the FACTS and ODD occurrences about the Charlie Kirk assassination. - Why does NOBODY seem to help or attend to Charlie's wound and WHY does NOBODY have any BLOOD on their hands? Why aren't they packing the wound? - There is NO WAY it was a .30-06 or a SOFT-TIP .30-06 round. NONE of that would even matter with the amount of power and FPS behind a .30-06 round. A soft-tip round would actually create an even bigger EXIT WOUND than a standard FMJ (Full Metal Jacket) round. BUT... We DIDN'T even get an EXIT WOUND at all, unless the hole we see is the exit wound. Even at a 9 degree angle, shooting from the roof position, a .30-06 would of 100% went RIGHT THROUGH Charlie's neck. Maybe even worse. There is NO WAY the bullet would deflect and go STRAIGHT DOWN after hitting his spine or neck bones. It would of CONTINUED DIRECTLY THROUGH. - Where is the RIFLE in the pictures of him on the steps? There is no visible RIFLE in his pant legs, and it WOULD not fit in that backpack especial with the barrel being 2 ft long itself even broken down, and especially the stock/butt of the gun and the scope fit into a pair of skinny jeans. HOW did Tyler get the RIFLE ON THE ROOF? - Why don't we have more footage, ESPECIALLY of when he took the shot or just with the RIFLE in his hands at ANY POINT? Why does the video start with him running? Nothing makes sense and now with all the new footage of Tyler at the gas station and all these other places and an alleged WOMAN that was seen with the shooter, it makes even less sense, with even more questions. cc: Alex Jones, Owen Benjamin

The SCIF

17,884 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Did Candace RUIN the OFFICIAL NARRATIVE by revealing that there was NO EXIT WOUND? Were they NEVER going to RELEASE ANY ANGLE from CHARLIE'S Perspective because it showed NO EXIT WOUND and the REAL SHOOTER? Was Charlie's killer a lot closer and in front of him and is this why we don't have any perspectives from Charlie's view, like THE FIRST CAMERA that they took the SD cards from? Candace say's she believes the shooter to be in the front and to the left in the crowd. Which lines up. The shooter was closer. People interviewed right after the shooting claimed it sounded a lot closer than where they say it was from, which would line up more with the "ENTRANCE WOUND" we see, what bones were broken first in his neck, and where they found the fragment of the bullet. The rifle or other gun sounds, etc., could have been all distractions, like the decoy shooters/George Zinn, to mask the sound and misdirect people from where the REAL SHOT came from. You must take into consideration how much misdirection and disinformation would be presented if this is indeed a MILITARY/INTELLIGENCE style operation. These people are very intelligent. Do NOT underestimate them. cc: Candace Owens
5:43

Did Candace RUIN the OFFICIAL NARRATIVE by revealing that there was NO EXIT WOUND? Were they NEVER going to RELEASE ANY ANGLE from CHARLIE'S Perspective because it showed NO EXIT WOUND and the REAL SHOOTER? Was Charlie's killer a lot closer and in front of him and is this why we don't have any perspectives from Charlie's view, like THE FIRST CAMERA that they took the SD cards from? Candace say's she believes the shooter to be in the front and to the left in the crowd. Which lines up. The shooter was closer. People interviewed right after the shooting claimed it sounded a lot closer than where they say it was from, which would line up more with the "ENTRANCE WOUND" we see, what bones were broken first in his neck, and where they found the fragment of the bullet. The rifle or other gun sounds, etc., could have been all distractions, like the decoy shooters/George Zinn, to mask the sound and misdirect people from where the REAL SHOT came from. You must take into consideration how much misdirection and disinformation would be presented if this is indeed a MILITARY/INTELLIGENCE style operation. These people are very intelligent. Do NOT underestimate them. cc: Candace Owens

The SCIF

36,744 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

🔥WOW…Harpole talks about THE SHOT TYLER ROBINSON TOOK that killed Charlie Kirk at UVU on 9/10. "IT IS A VERY SPECIFIC SPOT" - Shawn Ryan Brian Harpole says "He wants to know when he got on the roof. 3 meters to the left & to the right..THERE WAS NO SHOT. DID YOU GET ALL THAT OF GOOGLE?" Shawn Ryan says "IT HAD TO HAVE BEEN REHEARSED." Harpole also says that someone early that day had a drone up but it is not UNCOMMON for the AV team to use a drone. Once again a lot of this goes back to relying on the Chief of UVU and the belief that they had those roofs covered. And like I said that day..how did they know the exact perfect spot for that shot when Charlie NEVER did an event there? When was the tent SETUP? This wasn’t announced to the public under about 8/29..so when did he scout this? Did he go before? How was he lucky enough to know that THE UVU POLICE WOULD NOT cover that staircase. Why didn’t UVU ask for police assistance from Orem PD who are ALLOWED TO FLY DRONES?
7:39

🔥WOW…Harpole talks about THE SHOT TYLER ROBINSON TOOK that killed Charlie Kirk at UVU on 9/10. "IT IS A VERY SPECIFIC SPOT" - Shawn Ryan Brian Harpole says "He wants to know when he got on the roof. 3 meters to the left & to the right..THERE WAS NO SHOT. DID YOU GET ALL THAT OF GOOGLE?" Shawn Ryan says "IT HAD TO HAVE BEEN REHEARSED." Harpole also says that someone early that day had a drone up but it is not UNCOMMON for the AV team to use a drone. Once again a lot of this goes back to relying on the Chief of UVU and the belief that they had those roofs covered. And like I said that day..how did they know the exact perfect spot for that shot when Charlie NEVER did an event there? When was the tent SETUP? This wasn’t announced to the public under about 8/29..so when did he scout this? Did he go before? How was he lucky enough to know that THE UVU POLICE WOULD NOT cover that staircase. Why didn’t UVU ask for police assistance from Orem PD who are ALLOWED TO FLY DRONES?

Johnny St.Pete

77,483 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Candace stands her ground that this was an INTELLIGENCE/MILITARY type operation with multiple ACTORS for distractions. -Was Lance "Twiggs" one of the other people than we seen at UVU on the day of the shooting? - George Zinn had to receive medical attention the day of the shooting and stated to multiple people at the hospital that he said he acted like he k*lled Charlie because he said he was going to be paid for doing it. - We know of 4 potential "ACTORS" George Zinn, Maroon shirt guy, The guy on the stairs, and the guy on the Losee building. These could all and MOST LIKELY all be distractions to take attention away from the real killer. - Candace states that she believes Tyler's role in all of it had something to do with the changing of outfits to confuse investigators because he was seen putting a change of clothes in the graveyard and then is seen at the DQ in the infamous picture. - The reason coming to this conclusion is because we never see the "person" on the Losee building ever take a shot, we just see him running, and the guy in the maroon shirt, looks, and has a different build from the guy on the stairs in the black shirt and hat. - We know now with all the evidence we have gathered and concluded from this point that there is no way Charlie was shot with a .30-06 round or from the roof of the Losee building because of the alleged autopsy report that claims his C2 vertebrae broke first and by the location and angle of the alleged "entrance wound" that looks more like an "exit wound." - The bullet would of had to enter Charlie through his mouth or jaw in order to physically break the C2 bone first, pull a 90 degree angle and continue to break the C7. None of it makes any sense if the alleged autopsy report is 100% official as it claims. Plus they said they found the bullet right beneath the skin. - He had to be shot from a different location with a smaller round or some kind of other projectile weapon/round. This was a highly orchestrated hit and it has intelligence written all over it. I have came to all the same conclusions in my previous posts and stand with Candace. The writing is on the wall. cc: Candace Owens
12:27

Candace stands her ground that this was an INTELLIGENCE/MILITARY type operation with multiple ACTORS for distractions. -Was Lance "Twiggs" one of the other people than we seen at UVU on the day of the shooting? - George Zinn had to receive medical attention the day of the shooting and stated to multiple people at the hospital that he said he acted like he k*lled Charlie because he said he was going to be paid for doing it. - We know of 4 potential "ACTORS" George Zinn, Maroon shirt guy, The guy on the stairs, and the guy on the Losee building. These could all and MOST LIKELY all be distractions to take attention away from the real killer. - Candace states that she believes Tyler's role in all of it had something to do with the changing of outfits to confuse investigators because he was seen putting a change of clothes in the graveyard and then is seen at the DQ in the infamous picture. - The reason coming to this conclusion is because we never see the "person" on the Losee building ever take a shot, we just see him running, and the guy in the maroon shirt, looks, and has a different build from the guy on the stairs in the black shirt and hat. - We know now with all the evidence we have gathered and concluded from this point that there is no way Charlie was shot with a .30-06 round or from the roof of the Losee building because of the alleged autopsy report that claims his C2 vertebrae broke first and by the location and angle of the alleged "entrance wound" that looks more like an "exit wound." - The bullet would of had to enter Charlie through his mouth or jaw in order to physically break the C2 bone first, pull a 90 degree angle and continue to break the C7. None of it makes any sense if the alleged autopsy report is 100% official as it claims. Plus they said they found the bullet right beneath the skin. - He had to be shot from a different location with a smaller round or some kind of other projectile weapon/round. This was a highly orchestrated hit and it has intelligence written all over it. I have came to all the same conclusions in my previous posts and stand with Candace. The writing is on the wall. cc: Candace Owens

The SCIF

146,753 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

The evidence against Tyler Robinson is overwhelming. It's not close. Robinson confessed. Repeatedly. In person to his partner Lance Twiggs, crying, saying he was sorry he did it. By text the night of the shooting. In a note left under his keyboard. In a Discord message announcing he was about to surrender. And then he did surrender, at 9 p.m. the next night, exactly as the message said. And the single hardest fact to wave away: in that text, Robinson described leaving the rifle in a bush, wrapped in a towel — accurately describing where and how the Mauser was found by police, before any of that was public. The gun was recovered exactly there. A Mauser 98 .30-06, wrapped in a black towel, in the wooded area across Campus Drive — right where surveillance shows the rooftop figure fleeing within minutes of the shot. His DNA is all over it. Major contributor on the stock, grips, trigger and trigger guard, bolt, barrel, and scope. On the fired casing. On two of the unfired casings. On the screwdriver left on the roof. The casings were engraved — "hey fascist! CATCH!" among them. A Dremel tool and a matching bit capable of making those exact engravings were found in his home. So was a separate "Test Shot" casing — forensically matched as fired by that same rifle — sitting on a safe next to his bedroom. Plus boxes of Remington .30-06 and perforated paper targets. Surveillance puts him there. On the Losee Center roof, lying in the prone position, facing the courtyard — then up and running the moment Charlie was shot. Visiting the campus three other times that day, in different clothing, including the roof and the amphitheater where the shooting happened — tied each time to his gray Dodge Challenger. His own phone puts him there. Two Google Maps routes stored on his device: one starting near the shooting scene 23 minutes after Charlie was killed, headed to a car wash — where surveillance confirms his Challenger arrived at 12:57. The second, at 1:33 a.m., in the early hours of Sept 11, routing from near the rifle's location directly back to his home. His car puts him there. A Ring camera caught the Challenger parked near campus after midnight. At 12:30 a.m. an officer contacted that car at Campus Drive, wrote down the plate, and traced it through DMV records straight to Robinson — the same window he was texting Twiggs about sneaking back for the gun. The autopsy fits. Cause of death: homicide by a single gunshot wound. Recovered fragments measured consistent with a .30-caliber bullet. His own family turned him in. His parents recognized him from the released images and confronted him. A family friend helped coordinate his surrender. Twiggs identified him on the surveillance footage. Countless people have been convicted of murder on a fraction of this. You can find one detail that isn't explained to pixel-perfect satisfaction — a battery that died, a blurry frame, a fragment ruled inconclusive, a witness's recollection. Fine. Now explain all of it. The confession that knew where the towel-wrapped gun was before police announced it. The DNA on the roof and weapon. The engraved casings and the tool that made them. The car. The phone. His own family. His own words. Explain all of it. Not one piece or one question — all of it. Video: Knubeltier
1:29

The evidence against Tyler Robinson is overwhelming. It's not close. Robinson confessed. Repeatedly. In person to his partner Lance Twiggs, crying, saying he was sorry he did it. By text the night of the shooting. In a note left under his keyboard. In a Discord message announcing he was about to surrender. And then he did surrender, at 9 p.m. the next night, exactly as the message said. And the single hardest fact to wave away: in that text, Robinson described leaving the rifle in a bush, wrapped in a towel — accurately describing where and how the Mauser was found by police, before any of that was public. The gun was recovered exactly there. A Mauser 98 .30-06, wrapped in a black towel, in the wooded area across Campus Drive — right where surveillance shows the rooftop figure fleeing within minutes of the shot. His DNA is all over it. Major contributor on the stock, grips, trigger and trigger guard, bolt, barrel, and scope. On the fired casing. On two of the unfired casings. On the screwdriver left on the roof. The casings were engraved — "hey fascist! CATCH!" among them. A Dremel tool and a matching bit capable of making those exact engravings were found in his home. So was a separate "Test Shot" casing — forensically matched as fired by that same rifle — sitting on a safe next to his bedroom. Plus boxes of Remington .30-06 and perforated paper targets. Surveillance puts him there. On the Losee Center roof, lying in the prone position, facing the courtyard — then up and running the moment Charlie was shot. Visiting the campus three other times that day, in different clothing, including the roof and the amphitheater where the shooting happened — tied each time to his gray Dodge Challenger. His own phone puts him there. Two Google Maps routes stored on his device: one starting near the shooting scene 23 minutes after Charlie was killed, headed to a car wash — where surveillance confirms his Challenger arrived at 12:57. The second, at 1:33 a.m., in the early hours of Sept 11, routing from near the rifle's location directly back to his home. His car puts him there. A Ring camera caught the Challenger parked near campus after midnight. At 12:30 a.m. an officer contacted that car at Campus Drive, wrote down the plate, and traced it through DMV records straight to Robinson — the same window he was texting Twiggs about sneaking back for the gun. The autopsy fits. Cause of death: homicide by a single gunshot wound. Recovered fragments measured consistent with a .30-caliber bullet. His own family turned him in. His parents recognized him from the released images and confronted him. A family friend helped coordinate his surrender. Twiggs identified him on the surveillance footage. Countless people have been convicted of murder on a fraction of this. You can find one detail that isn't explained to pixel-perfect satisfaction — a battery that died, a blurry frame, a fragment ruled inconclusive, a witness's recollection. Fine. Now explain all of it. The confession that knew where the towel-wrapped gun was before police announced it. The DNA on the roof and weapon. The engraved casings and the tool that made them. The car. The phone. His own family. His own words. Explain all of it. Not one piece or one question — all of it. Video: Knubeltier

KanekoaTheGreat

171,926 görüntüleme • 4 gün önce

🚨FBI IGNORED Eyewitnesses Who Saw Shooter In ALL-BLACK Up Close—Construction Worker Dylan Hope Speaks Out 🕵️‍♂️👀 The "official" story of the Charlie Kirk assassination looks less like a federal investigation and more like a poorly engineered cover up. Picture this: On September 10, 2025 in the early hours of the chaos, the description was crystal clear. Police dispatchers were broadcasting this suspect description: A male wearing all black, a black tactical helmet and a black mask. But wait, there’s more. Dylan Hope, a construction worker on-site, saw him too. A man in a black trench coat and black cargo pants, and long greasy hair. Matching that exact "tactical" description. And then there’s the only video evidence we have—filmed an hour before the hit—showing a person in a prone position on that roof. What were they wearing? You guessed it. All black. But then the feds stepped in. And suddenly, the man in the black mask vanished into the "fed-slop" ether. In his place, they gave us Tyler Robinson. A kid in a T-shirt and jeans who (allegedly) "dropped" onto a roof with a rifle that nobody saw him carry. As Candace Owens revealed, the eyewitness who filmed the shooter says definitively: "Tyler Robinson is NOT the guy." The gun doesn't match. The outfit doesn't match. The ballistic fragments don't even match Tyler’s rifle. So how did we get here? Tyler didn't confess. His father’s "sheriff friend" just pointed a finger, and the feds ran with it. Why? Because the feds don't want you looking for the man in the black trench coat. They want a "Patsy" to close the case. They want you to believe a "Discord fan-fiction" script instead of the dispatch audio recorded in the heat of the moment. They abandonment of the original evidence isn't a mistake—it’s a pivot. They ignored the tactical professional on the roof to frame the kid they told to "drop off a gun" at a neighboring house. We are 7 months removed from that day, and the truth is finally outrunning the lies. They think we’ve forgotten the man with the greasy hair and the black mask. They think we’ve stopped listening to the dispatch tapes. They are wrong. Watch the footage. Listen to the witnesses. Make your own informed decision. Because we don't do "scripts." We do facts. 🇺🇸⚖️
1:23

🚨FBI IGNORED Eyewitnesses Who Saw Shooter In ALL-BLACK Up Close—Construction Worker Dylan Hope Speaks Out 🕵️‍♂️👀 The "official" story of the Charlie Kirk assassination looks less like a federal investigation and more like a poorly engineered cover up. Picture this: On September 10, 2025 in the early hours of the chaos, the description was crystal clear. Police dispatchers were broadcasting this suspect description: A male wearing all black, a black tactical helmet and a black mask. But wait, there’s more. Dylan Hope, a construction worker on-site, saw him too. A man in a black trench coat and black cargo pants, and long greasy hair. Matching that exact "tactical" description. And then there’s the only video evidence we have—filmed an hour before the hit—showing a person in a prone position on that roof. What were they wearing? You guessed it. All black. But then the feds stepped in. And suddenly, the man in the black mask vanished into the "fed-slop" ether. In his place, they gave us Tyler Robinson. A kid in a T-shirt and jeans who (allegedly) "dropped" onto a roof with a rifle that nobody saw him carry. As Candace Owens revealed, the eyewitness who filmed the shooter says definitively: "Tyler Robinson is NOT the guy." The gun doesn't match. The outfit doesn't match. The ballistic fragments don't even match Tyler’s rifle. So how did we get here? Tyler didn't confess. His father’s "sheriff friend" just pointed a finger, and the feds ran with it. Why? Because the feds don't want you looking for the man in the black trench coat. They want a "Patsy" to close the case. They want you to believe a "Discord fan-fiction" script instead of the dispatch audio recorded in the heat of the moment. They abandonment of the original evidence isn't a mistake—it’s a pivot. They ignored the tactical professional on the roof to frame the kid they told to "drop off a gun" at a neighboring house. We are 7 months removed from that day, and the truth is finally outrunning the lies. They think we’ve forgotten the man with the greasy hair and the black mask. They think we’ve stopped listening to the dispatch tapes. They are wrong. Watch the footage. Listen to the witnesses. Make your own informed decision. Because we don't do "scripts." We do facts. 🇺🇸⚖️

Project Constitution

40,816 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Left: the original footage the FBI released of Tyler Robinson on the roof. Right: the same footage from the preliminary hearing. Every version people have been arguing about is the one on the right. A camera pointed at a courtroom screen. You lose enormous resolution doing that. Law enforcement has the original and always has. It doesn't show his face. It was never going to. He wore sunglasses and a hat the entire time he was on campus, and this is a wide angle camera across a parking lot. They know it's Tyler Robinson because of the corroborating evidence. He confessed to his boyfriend over text. He confessed on Discord. He confessed in a handwritten note he left under a keyboard. He confessed to his father, who called a former deputy, and then he turned himself in with his parents. Texts describing exactly how and where his rifle was hidden before that information was made public. The DNA. The car. A Google Maps route pulled off his own phone starting 23 minutes after the shot. Car wash video of his Challenger 11 minutes after that. A second route, at 1:33 in the morning, from the neighborhood beside where the rifle was found straight to his home in St. George. A dremel tool in his apartment, near a bag of .30-06 with one cartridge etched "test shot," matching the engraved casings sitting next to the rifle. And the video. A guy limping onto the roof with something bulging under his shirt at the waistband. Prone at the edge at 1222. Charlie is shot at 1223. He gets up and sprints on the same leg that couldn't bend going up the stairs minutes earlier. I hope they release all of it in the highest resolution they have. There are digital techniques to zoom in, stabilize, and sharpen footage. The people telling you this isn't Tyler Robinson also told you Charlie was killed by Egyptian planes, the U.S. military, French legionnaires, Ben Shapiro, and TPUSA, without a shred of evidence. After nine months devoted to defending the man accused of killing Charlie while attacking his widow, his friends, and his organization, they're not following the evidence. They don't care about the truth or justice for Charlie. It's always been about spinning a narrative to fit their preconceived ideological bias and making as much money as possible from Charlie's murder.
1:20

Left: the original footage the FBI released of Tyler Robinson on the roof. Right: the same footage from the preliminary hearing. Every version people have been arguing about is the one on the right. A camera pointed at a courtroom screen. You lose enormous resolution doing that. Law enforcement has the original and always has. It doesn't show his face. It was never going to. He wore sunglasses and a hat the entire time he was on campus, and this is a wide angle camera across a parking lot. They know it's Tyler Robinson because of the corroborating evidence. He confessed to his boyfriend over text. He confessed on Discord. He confessed in a handwritten note he left under a keyboard. He confessed to his father, who called a former deputy, and then he turned himself in with his parents. Texts describing exactly how and where his rifle was hidden before that information was made public. The DNA. The car. A Google Maps route pulled off his own phone starting 23 minutes after the shot. Car wash video of his Challenger 11 minutes after that. A second route, at 1:33 in the morning, from the neighborhood beside where the rifle was found straight to his home in St. George. A dremel tool in his apartment, near a bag of .30-06 with one cartridge etched "test shot," matching the engraved casings sitting next to the rifle. And the video. A guy limping onto the roof with something bulging under his shirt at the waistband. Prone at the edge at 1222. Charlie is shot at 1223. He gets up and sprints on the same leg that couldn't bend going up the stairs minutes earlier. I hope they release all of it in the highest resolution they have. There are digital techniques to zoom in, stabilize, and sharpen footage. The people telling you this isn't Tyler Robinson also told you Charlie was killed by Egyptian planes, the U.S. military, French legionnaires, Ben Shapiro, and TPUSA, without a shred of evidence. After nine months devoted to defending the man accused of killing Charlie while attacking his widow, his friends, and his organization, they're not following the evidence. They don't care about the truth or justice for Charlie. It's always been about spinning a narrative to fit their preconceived ideological bias and making as much money as possible from Charlie's murder.

KanekoaTheGreat

150,879 görüntüleme • 1 gün önce

BOMBSHELL: SECOND LASER SPOTTED in Charlie Kirk "Assassination" Footage – Who's REALLY Pulling the Strings?! Hold onto your tinfoil hats – eagle-eyed investigators on our Charlie Kirk Investigatory Committee (shoutout to Josh D for the find -FOLLOW Him) unearthed a chilling new clue in the Charlie Kirk near-miss that could shatter the official story wide open. Diving deep into raw event footage, my team froze frame-by-frame and caught what looks like another laser beam locked onto the mystery man in the black shirt, positioned dead to Charlie's left from his onstage vantage point staring out at the crowd. This isn't the first red flag: remember the initial beam we found was the clue that tied everything together for us in determining the shooter on the BA Building. Now we've got a second one, beaming in from an impossible angle, raising massive questions about coordinated sabotage. Was this a sloppy hit squad slip-up, or deliberate misdirection to frame the wrong players? Security lapses, shadowy figures, and now dual lasers – it's starting to smell like a full-blown setup, not some lone-wolf fluke. The deeper we dig, the dirtier it gets – but we need your sharp eyes to crack this. Drop your wildest theories, video timestamps, or insider tips in the comments below: What's the real endgame here, and who benefits most from silencing voices like Kirk's?
0:36

BOMBSHELL: SECOND LASER SPOTTED in Charlie Kirk "Assassination" Footage – Who's REALLY Pulling the Strings?! Hold onto your tinfoil hats – eagle-eyed investigators on our Charlie Kirk Investigatory Committee (shoutout to Josh D for the find -FOLLOW Him) unearthed a chilling new clue in the Charlie Kirk near-miss that could shatter the official story wide open. Diving deep into raw event footage, my team froze frame-by-frame and caught what looks like another laser beam locked onto the mystery man in the black shirt, positioned dead to Charlie's left from his onstage vantage point staring out at the crowd. This isn't the first red flag: remember the initial beam we found was the clue that tied everything together for us in determining the shooter on the BA Building. Now we've got a second one, beaming in from an impossible angle, raising massive questions about coordinated sabotage. Was this a sloppy hit squad slip-up, or deliberate misdirection to frame the wrong players? Security lapses, shadowy figures, and now dual lasers – it's starting to smell like a full-blown setup, not some lone-wolf fluke. The deeper we dig, the dirtier it gets – but we need your sharp eyes to crack this. Drop your wildest theories, video timestamps, or insider tips in the comments below: What's the real endgame here, and who benefits most from silencing voices like Kirk's?

Project Constitution

147,080 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

This is one answer. 1/2 REPORTER: Mr. President, Tulsi Gabbard has submitted a criminal referral to the Department of Justice. From your perspective, who should the DOJ target as part of their investigation? What specific figures in the Obama administration? TRUMP: Well, based on what I read, and I read pretty much what you read, it would be President Obama, he started it, and Biden was there with him, and Comey was there, and Clapper the whole whole group was there. Brennan, they were all there, in a room. Right here, this was the room. This is much more beautiful than it was then, but that's okay. I have nice pictures up, they came out of the vaults, they were in there for 100 years, this is much more beautiful. We have the Declaration of Independence now in the room, which wasn't here. I guess people didn't feel too good about putting it here, but I do. But you know what, if you look at those papers, they have a stone cold, and it was President Obama. It wasn't lots of people all over the place, it was them too. But the leader of the gang was President Obama, Barack Hussein Obama, have you heard of him? And except for the fact that he gets shielded by the press for his entire life, that's the one they, look, he's guilty. It's not a question. You know, I like to say, let's give it time. It's there, he's guilty. This was treason. This was every word you can think of. They tried to steal the election. They tried to obfuscate the election. They did things that nobody's ever even imagined, even in other countries. You've seen some pretty rough countries. This man has seen some pretty rough countries, but you've never seen anything like that. And we have all of the documents. And from what Tulsi told me, she's got thousands of additional documents coming. So President Obama, it was his concept, his idea, but he also got it from crooked Hillary Clinton. Crooked is a $3 bill. Hillary Clinton and her group, the Democrats, spent $12 million to Christopher Steele to write up a report that was a total fake report. Took two years to figure that out, but it came out that it was a total fake report. It was made up fiction. And they used that. The one thing they weren't able to do was to, and probably the only thing I respect about the press in years is the press refused to write it before the election. They refused to put it in. The Steele report was a disaster. All lies, all fabrication, all admitted, and admitted fraud. She paid $12 million and the Democrats for that report to a wise guy named Christopher Steele. He wrote a phony report, and they wanted to get that report in before the election. And I'll tell you what, I talk about all the time the fake news, how bad it is. But in this case, they wouldn't do it. They saw it. They read it. And they said, "We don't believe it." And it was only after, substantially, like a month and a half after the election that it got printed, and it was a big wisp, it was just like a bang, nothing, because the election had ended. If that report had gotten published by the New York Times or somebody, and I respect the Times for maybe only this, because they're crooked as you can be. They're a terrible paper, a crooked, corrupt paper. But for this one moment, they said, "This is bullshit. We can't put this in." And neither could any other paper. Wall Street Journal's a lousy paper, very, very dishonest paper. As you see, I'm suing them for a lot of money, because they do things very badly. It's a really, it's got a nice name, but it's really, in my opinion, it's a terrible paper, and it can be corrupt. But just so you know, they didn't take the steel report. It was the dossier. Remember the famous dossier? I called it the fake news dossier. The news wouldn't publish it. And I'm amazed.
6:18

This is one answer. 1/2 REPORTER: Mr. President, Tulsi Gabbard has submitted a criminal referral to the Department of Justice. From your perspective, who should the DOJ target as part of their investigation? What specific figures in the Obama administration? TRUMP: Well, based on what I read, and I read pretty much what you read, it would be President Obama, he started it, and Biden was there with him, and Comey was there, and Clapper the whole whole group was there. Brennan, they were all there, in a room. Right here, this was the room. This is much more beautiful than it was then, but that's okay. I have nice pictures up, they came out of the vaults, they were in there for 100 years, this is much more beautiful. We have the Declaration of Independence now in the room, which wasn't here. I guess people didn't feel too good about putting it here, but I do. But you know what, if you look at those papers, they have a stone cold, and it was President Obama. It wasn't lots of people all over the place, it was them too. But the leader of the gang was President Obama, Barack Hussein Obama, have you heard of him? And except for the fact that he gets shielded by the press for his entire life, that's the one they, look, he's guilty. It's not a question. You know, I like to say, let's give it time. It's there, he's guilty. This was treason. This was every word you can think of. They tried to steal the election. They tried to obfuscate the election. They did things that nobody's ever even imagined, even in other countries. You've seen some pretty rough countries. This man has seen some pretty rough countries, but you've never seen anything like that. And we have all of the documents. And from what Tulsi told me, she's got thousands of additional documents coming. So President Obama, it was his concept, his idea, but he also got it from crooked Hillary Clinton. Crooked is a $3 bill. Hillary Clinton and her group, the Democrats, spent $12 million to Christopher Steele to write up a report that was a total fake report. Took two years to figure that out, but it came out that it was a total fake report. It was made up fiction. And they used that. The one thing they weren't able to do was to, and probably the only thing I respect about the press in years is the press refused to write it before the election. They refused to put it in. The Steele report was a disaster. All lies, all fabrication, all admitted, and admitted fraud. She paid $12 million and the Democrats for that report to a wise guy named Christopher Steele. He wrote a phony report, and they wanted to get that report in before the election. And I'll tell you what, I talk about all the time the fake news, how bad it is. But in this case, they wouldn't do it. They saw it. They read it. And they said, "We don't believe it." And it was only after, substantially, like a month and a half after the election that it got printed, and it was a big wisp, it was just like a bang, nothing, because the election had ended. If that report had gotten published by the New York Times or somebody, and I respect the Times for maybe only this, because they're crooked as you can be. They're a terrible paper, a crooked, corrupt paper. But for this one moment, they said, "This is bullshit. We can't put this in." And neither could any other paper. Wall Street Journal's a lousy paper, very, very dishonest paper. As you see, I'm suing them for a lot of money, because they do things very badly. It's a really, it's got a nice name, but it's really, in my opinion, it's a terrible paper, and it can be corrupt. But just so you know, they didn't take the steel report. It was the dossier. Remember the famous dossier? I called it the fake news dossier. The news wouldn't publish it. And I'm amazed.

Jim Stewartson, Antifascist 🇨🇦🇺🇦🏴‍☠️🇺🇸

36,593 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨 BOMBSHELL: Charlie Kirk's Killer Wasn't Alone – Video PROOF Shows 4 Other Individuals On ROOF! The official narrative on Charlie Kirk's assassination at Utah Valley University is falling apart – this was no lone gunman act, but a premeditated, government-orchestrated hit. Eyewitness videos and photos reveal a web of deception that the FBI is desperate to bury, just like JFK and MLK. Videos capture multiple suspicious figures on four rooftops encircling Kirk's tent moments before the fatal shot: A man running across the Sparks Building roof and dropping prone. Another sprinting on the Sorensen Building before hiding behind an AC unit. A crouched person on the Woodbury Building popping their head up at 12:06 PM Lastly the Losee Center, where the FBI pins it on Robinson. Shockingly, a cop was photographed on the roof directly behind the tent with clear views of all these spots – yet no investigation? This officer's identity remains unidentified despite circulating photos, raising massive red flags about ignored threats. The rifle mystery screams setup: Robinson arrives in shorts with no visible 4-foot Mauser, flees empty-handed – where's the weapon? "Incriminating" texts sound scripted, not like a 22-year-old; he's a 4.0 GPA kid pleading not guilty, likely lured as a decoy. FBI stalls with vague probes, while Trump's funeral pivot to an autism "bombshell" is classic distraction. Conspiracies point to insiders, possible crowd shooters, and pressure to silence questions. Wound physics and untraceable gun don't add up – this is intentional misdirection. This reeks of a sanctioned hit by shadowy powers, with Robinson as the sacrificial patsy to deflect from the real operatives. The pattern matches historic cover-ups: Decoys, stalls, distractions. We won't let it fade – demand answers before it's memory-holed! Shoutout to Black Scout Survival On Youtube/ Black Scout Survival Here on X , Ill Post the link to his full video in the comments below. Go check it out, subscribe and give him a like. Btw he has multiple videos on the Charlie Kirk shooting and i highly suggest you check them all out. I want to hear your theory in the comments below. Was Tyler Robinson even the shooter or just a PATSY?
12:01

🚨 BOMBSHELL: Charlie Kirk's Killer Wasn't Alone – Video PROOF Shows 4 Other Individuals On ROOF! The official narrative on Charlie Kirk's assassination at Utah Valley University is falling apart – this was no lone gunman act, but a premeditated, government-orchestrated hit. Eyewitness videos and photos reveal a web of deception that the FBI is desperate to bury, just like JFK and MLK. Videos capture multiple suspicious figures on four rooftops encircling Kirk's tent moments before the fatal shot: A man running across the Sparks Building roof and dropping prone. Another sprinting on the Sorensen Building before hiding behind an AC unit. A crouched person on the Woodbury Building popping their head up at 12:06 PM Lastly the Losee Center, where the FBI pins it on Robinson. Shockingly, a cop was photographed on the roof directly behind the tent with clear views of all these spots – yet no investigation? This officer's identity remains unidentified despite circulating photos, raising massive red flags about ignored threats. The rifle mystery screams setup: Robinson arrives in shorts with no visible 4-foot Mauser, flees empty-handed – where's the weapon? "Incriminating" texts sound scripted, not like a 22-year-old; he's a 4.0 GPA kid pleading not guilty, likely lured as a decoy. FBI stalls with vague probes, while Trump's funeral pivot to an autism "bombshell" is classic distraction. Conspiracies point to insiders, possible crowd shooters, and pressure to silence questions. Wound physics and untraceable gun don't add up – this is intentional misdirection. This reeks of a sanctioned hit by shadowy powers, with Robinson as the sacrificial patsy to deflect from the real operatives. The pattern matches historic cover-ups: Decoys, stalls, distractions. We won't let it fade – demand answers before it's memory-holed! Shoutout to Black Scout Survival On Youtube/ Black Scout Survival Here on X , Ill Post the link to his full video in the comments below. Go check it out, subscribe and give him a like. Btw he has multiple videos on the Charlie Kirk shooting and i highly suggest you check them all out. I want to hear your theory in the comments below. Was Tyler Robinson even the shooter or just a PATSY?

Project Constitution

20,769 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce