正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

🚨 MIND-BLOWING. FIRST ON FOX: Who were the executives -- by name -- behind the SPLC's pay-to-hate scheme and what was the bank -- by name -- that they used? Hint: It went to the C-suite. WATCH what SPLC target أبو عمّار believes should next happen to the Southern...

AsraNomani's profile picture

Asra Nomani

197,701 subscribers

95,144 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨 Explosive Allegations: Southern Poverty Law Center Accused of Funding the KKK with Donor Money The DOJ has dropped a superseding indictment against the SPLC, revealing they allegedly funneled donor dollars to the very hate groups they claim to fight, including the Ku Klux Klan. According to the charges: SPLC participated in recruiting new KKK members using donor funds. An SPLC employee knew the money was used to purchase KKK robes, hoods, and materials for cross-burning events. The group was reimbursed by the SPLC for these expenses. This comes after a federal grand jury already hit the SPLC with an 11-count fraud and money laundering indictment last month. The SPLC’s attorney is downplaying the new charges, but the hypocrisy is glaring: A group that labels everyone to the right of them as “hate groups” allegedly bankrolling actual Klan activity.
0:59

🚨 Explosive Allegations: Southern Poverty Law Center Accused of Funding the KKK with Donor Money The DOJ has dropped a superseding indictment against the SPLC, revealing they allegedly funneled donor dollars to the very hate groups they claim to fight, including the Ku Klux Klan. According to the charges: SPLC participated in recruiting new KKK members using donor funds. An SPLC employee knew the money was used to purchase KKK robes, hoods, and materials for cross-burning events. The group was reimbursed by the SPLC for these expenses. This comes after a federal grand jury already hit the SPLC with an 11-count fraud and money laundering indictment last month. The SPLC’s attorney is downplaying the new charges, but the hypocrisy is glaring: A group that labels everyone to the right of them as “hate groups” allegedly bankrolling actual Klan activity.

Gunther Eagleman™

13,216 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Former Southern Poverty Law Center CFO Heidi Beirich has been ARRESTED, AG Todd Blanche just confirmed a newly unsealed indictment She was part of SECRET PAYMENTS to informants inside white supremacist groups. The fraudulent NGO is CRASHING DOWN! "The arrest was THIS MORNING." "This is EXACTLY what we said would happen." "As alleged...she was part of the effort to open bank accounts in fictitious companies' names, and make payments to individuals for reasons that were not accurate as described."
1:21

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Former Southern Poverty Law Center CFO Heidi Beirich has been ARRESTED, AG Todd Blanche just confirmed a newly unsealed indictment She was part of SECRET PAYMENTS to informants inside white supremacist groups. The fraudulent NGO is CRASHING DOWN! "The arrest was THIS MORNING." "This is EXACTLY what we said would happen." "As alleged...she was part of the effort to open bank accounts in fictitious companies' names, and make payments to individuals for reasons that were not accurate as described."

Eric Daugherty

154,464 次观看 • 8 天前

For the first time ever Trump just attacked the heart of the deep state.. BREAKING: DOJ charges the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) with wire fraud, false statements, and conspiracy to commit money laundering. The SPLC secretly funneled $3M+ in donor funds to violent racist extremist groups: -Ku Klux Klan -American Nazi Party -Aryan Nation -United Klans of America -Unite the Right -National Alliance -National Socialist Movement -Sadistic Souls Motorcycle Club -American Front To hide the payments, SPLC allegedly opened bank accounts under fictitious entities to conceal the source and control of donor funds. Per the indictment: an SPLC field source was a member of the online leadership chat group that planned the 2017 "Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville — made racist postings under SPLC supervision and helped coordinate transportation to the event. FBI Director Kash Patel: "They lied to their donors, vowing to dismantle violent extremist groups, and actually turned around and paid the leaders of these very extremist groups — even utilizing the funds to have these groups facilitate the commission of state and federal crimes." Acting AG Todd Blanche: "The SPLC is manufacturing racism to justify its existence. Using donor money to allegedly profit off Klansmen cannot go unchecked." Scheme allegedly ran 2014–2023. FBI calls it an ongoing investigation. Insane!!!
3:37

For the first time ever Trump just attacked the heart of the deep state.. BREAKING: DOJ charges the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) with wire fraud, false statements, and conspiracy to commit money laundering. The SPLC secretly funneled $3M+ in donor funds to violent racist extremist groups: -Ku Klux Klan -American Nazi Party -Aryan Nation -United Klans of America -Unite the Right -National Alliance -National Socialist Movement -Sadistic Souls Motorcycle Club -American Front To hide the payments, SPLC allegedly opened bank accounts under fictitious entities to conceal the source and control of donor funds. Per the indictment: an SPLC field source was a member of the online leadership chat group that planned the 2017 "Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville — made racist postings under SPLC supervision and helped coordinate transportation to the event. FBI Director Kash Patel: "They lied to their donors, vowing to dismantle violent extremist groups, and actually turned around and paid the leaders of these very extremist groups — even utilizing the funds to have these groups facilitate the commission of state and federal crimes." Acting AG Todd Blanche: "The SPLC is manufacturing racism to justify its existence. Using donor money to allegedly profit off Klansmen cannot go unchecked." Scheme allegedly ran 2014–2023. FBI calls it an ongoing investigation. Insane!!!

Alex Jones

959,953 次观看 • 4 个月前

After being asked what the actual crime committed by SPLC, AAG Blanche took the time to explain it CLEARLY for the Dipshit Democrats. "The Southern Poverty Law Center, is a 501(c)(3), okay? They're required to, under the laws associated with a nonprofit, to have certain transparency and honesty in what they're telling donors they're gonna spend money on and what their mission statement is and what they're raising money doing." 'And so as the indictment points out, there's different ways that they raise money. And in no fundraising efforts that the investigation found did they say, and by the way, we're gonna give a million bucks to the Ku Klux Klan." "That's wire fraud." "Then the bank fraud part of it is you have KYC, you have an obligation to tell your financial institution what the what the corporation or the entity that you're opening an account for does. And the allegations in the indictment are that these were fictitious companies that were set up. And so there was certain information sworn to by SPLC executives about what the entities were doing that we allege is false." They're FCKED.
2:02

After being asked what the actual crime committed by SPLC, AAG Blanche took the time to explain it CLEARLY for the Dipshit Democrats. "The Southern Poverty Law Center, is a 501(c)(3), okay? They're required to, under the laws associated with a nonprofit, to have certain transparency and honesty in what they're telling donors they're gonna spend money on and what their mission statement is and what they're raising money doing." 'And so as the indictment points out, there's different ways that they raise money. And in no fundraising efforts that the investigation found did they say, and by the way, we're gonna give a million bucks to the Ku Klux Klan." "That's wire fraud." "Then the bank fraud part of it is you have KYC, you have an obligation to tell your financial institution what the what the corporation or the entity that you're opening an account for does. And the allegations in the indictment are that these were fictitious companies that were set up. And so there was certain information sworn to by SPLC executives about what the entities were doing that we allege is false." They're FCKED.

Gunther Eagleman™

562,408 次观看 • 4 个月前

Back in 2018, Heidi Beirich sat on stage as the face of SPLC’s “Intelligence Project,” the group responsible for the “Hate Map,”talking about giving teachers and students the tools to stop hate in schools. She spoke like SPLC was the nation’s moral compass on hate, the group that tracked “hate incidents” after Trump’s election and then packaged those numbers into school programs and “Teaching Tolerance” materials that they pushed into K–12 classrooms. Fast‑forward eight years, and now we find out the same organization has been indicted by a federal grand jury for a long‑running fraud scheme, accused of secretly funneling millions of dollars to informants inside extremist and white‑supremacist groups, hiding those payments with sham entities, and lying to banks and donors about where the money was going. In other words, while Heidi was telling schools that SPLC was the answer to hate, prosecutors now say SPLC was quietly paying the very people living and breathing that hate to keep the hate alive.
2:49

Back in 2018, Heidi Beirich sat on stage as the face of SPLC’s “Intelligence Project,” the group responsible for the “Hate Map,”talking about giving teachers and students the tools to stop hate in schools. She spoke like SPLC was the nation’s moral compass on hate, the group that tracked “hate incidents” after Trump’s election and then packaged those numbers into school programs and “Teaching Tolerance” materials that they pushed into K–12 classrooms. Fast‑forward eight years, and now we find out the same organization has been indicted by a federal grand jury for a long‑running fraud scheme, accused of secretly funneling millions of dollars to informants inside extremist and white‑supremacist groups, hiding those payments with sham entities, and lying to banks and donors about where the money was going. In other words, while Heidi was telling schools that SPLC was the answer to hate, prosecutors now say SPLC was quietly paying the very people living and breathing that hate to keep the hate alive.

Jammles

41,528 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 HOLY CRAP!! One of the people paid by the leftist NGO Southern Poverty Law Center was an ORGANIZER of the 2017 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA "Unite the Right" rally Which was USED by Democrats as a hoax to paint "white supremacy" to be larger than it is And the SPLC PAID FOR IT. Now they've been indicted — for MULTIPLE of these kinds of donations. TODD BLANCHE: "Imagine a donor to the SPLC if they were told — 'by the way we're gonna give the money you're giving us to the Ku Klux Klan.' In some cases over a million dollars!" "What we alleged in the indictment and what the grand jury found is that one of the individuals that they paid was one of the folks who helped organize that terrible [Charlottesville] event!" "And so that you so imagine what we're talking about — we're talking about an organization that actively came out and just screamed it from the top of their lungs!" "We know that they were part of those, they were part of it, whether they were the leaders or the initiators, that'll come out I think eventually." "But what we do know is that the very the very entities that this group was raising money to go against are the very entities that they were taking the money in and paying to these entities and these individuals associated with those groups."
2:38

🚨 HOLY CRAP!! One of the people paid by the leftist NGO Southern Poverty Law Center was an ORGANIZER of the 2017 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA "Unite the Right" rally Which was USED by Democrats as a hoax to paint "white supremacy" to be larger than it is And the SPLC PAID FOR IT. Now they've been indicted — for MULTIPLE of these kinds of donations. TODD BLANCHE: "Imagine a donor to the SPLC if they were told — 'by the way we're gonna give the money you're giving us to the Ku Klux Klan.' In some cases over a million dollars!" "What we alleged in the indictment and what the grand jury found is that one of the individuals that they paid was one of the folks who helped organize that terrible [Charlottesville] event!" "And so that you so imagine what we're talking about — we're talking about an organization that actively came out and just screamed it from the top of their lungs!" "We know that they were part of those, they were part of it, whether they were the leaders or the initiators, that'll come out I think eventually." "But what we do know is that the very the very entities that this group was raising money to go against are the very entities that they were taking the money in and paying to these entities and these individuals associated with those groups."

Eric Daugherty

104,343 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨 The Southern Poverty Law Center just got exposed as one of the biggest grifts in American politics. Former SPLC CFO Heidi Beirich, the same woman who spent years labeling conservatives, Catholics, and Charlie Kirk as “hate” is now federally charged in a multi-million dollar fraud scheme. Prosecutors say she was overseeing payments to a neo-Nazi informant… while sleeping with him, sharing a home, and using donor money to cover their personal living expenses. The same organization that made a fortune off Charlottesville and convinced half the country that Trump supporters were Nazis had one of its top officials bankrolling and bedding the very extremists they claimed to fight. Biden ran for president on the “very fine people” lie. The SPLC got rich off it. Media treated them like saints. It was never about fighting hate. It was a business. And the bill is finally coming due.
5:48

🚨 The Southern Poverty Law Center just got exposed as one of the biggest grifts in American politics. Former SPLC CFO Heidi Beirich, the same woman who spent years labeling conservatives, Catholics, and Charlie Kirk as “hate” is now federally charged in a multi-million dollar fraud scheme. Prosecutors say she was overseeing payments to a neo-Nazi informant… while sleeping with him, sharing a home, and using donor money to cover their personal living expenses. The same organization that made a fortune off Charlottesville and convinced half the country that Trump supporters were Nazis had one of its top officials bankrolling and bedding the very extremists they claimed to fight. Biden ran for president on the “very fine people” lie. The SPLC got rich off it. Media treated them like saints. It was never about fighting hate. It was a business. And the bill is finally coming due.

Gunther Eagleman™

59,583 次观看 • 8 天前

The SPLC story just entered a different phase... for years, the organization stood at the center of the extremism narrative, helping shape who was considered acceptable, who was considered dangerous, and who deserved access to the financial and digital infrastructure of modern society... Now federal prosecutors have charged the SPLC with wire fraud, bank fraud, and conspiracy to commit money laundering... allegations that cut directly against the image it spent decades building... What makes this so significant is not simply the charges themselves... it is what they imply... The same system that claimed authority to identify, track, and expose extremism now stands accused of funding, infiltrating, and benefiting from the very ecosystem it claimed to be fighting... That is why this story extends far beyond one organization... For years, NGOs, corporate censorship networks, financial deplatforming systems, media amplification, and narrative enforcement mechanisms have operated as a connected ecosystem... the SPLC became one of the most visible nodes inside that structure... Now that node is under criminal scrutiny... when one piece of a system begins to crack, attention naturally shifts to the connections, the relationships, the funding streams, and the institutions surrounding it... The SPLC is not the destination... it is the first visible fracture in a much larger architecture... quite literally, AI helped map the entire Fraud Industrial Complex... watch the video... The narrative protected the system... the receipts are exposing it... more below...
2:21

The SPLC story just entered a different phase... for years, the organization stood at the center of the extremism narrative, helping shape who was considered acceptable, who was considered dangerous, and who deserved access to the financial and digital infrastructure of modern society... Now federal prosecutors have charged the SPLC with wire fraud, bank fraud, and conspiracy to commit money laundering... allegations that cut directly against the image it spent decades building... What makes this so significant is not simply the charges themselves... it is what they imply... The same system that claimed authority to identify, track, and expose extremism now stands accused of funding, infiltrating, and benefiting from the very ecosystem it claimed to be fighting... That is why this story extends far beyond one organization... For years, NGOs, corporate censorship networks, financial deplatforming systems, media amplification, and narrative enforcement mechanisms have operated as a connected ecosystem... the SPLC became one of the most visible nodes inside that structure... Now that node is under criminal scrutiny... when one piece of a system begins to crack, attention naturally shifts to the connections, the relationships, the funding streams, and the institutions surrounding it... The SPLC is not the destination... it is the first visible fracture in a much larger architecture... quite literally, AI helped map the entire Fraud Industrial Complex... watch the video... The narrative protected the system... the receipts are exposing it... more below...

Observing Consciousness

12,397 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨 Tucker Carlson reveals the Offer the Trump Administration made to Minnesota Officials that hasn’t been made public yet — MN Officials said no 1. Local Police have to answer 911 calls from federal agents —— as of now, if an agent is in danger and requests assistance, they don’t get it. 2. Local Police has to work to protect Federal law enforcement from being killed when they’re off duty 3. The jails have to tell the federal government where the pedophiles and rapist are, and hand them over 4. If officials do that, the vast majority of Federal law enforcement will be pulled from Minnesota, but remain to protect Federal assets The response from Minnesota officials was “NO, we’re not doing that.” This is proof that what you’re witnessing in Minnesota is the beginning of a Color Revolution. Clip Tucker Full Show
4:28

🚨 Tucker Carlson reveals the Offer the Trump Administration made to Minnesota Officials that hasn’t been made public yet — MN Officials said no 1. Local Police have to answer 911 calls from federal agents —— as of now, if an agent is in danger and requests assistance, they don’t get it. 2. Local Police has to work to protect Federal law enforcement from being killed when they’re off duty 3. The jails have to tell the federal government where the pedophiles and rapist are, and hand them over 4. If officials do that, the vast majority of Federal law enforcement will be pulled from Minnesota, but remain to protect Federal assets The response from Minnesota officials was “NO, we’re not doing that.” This is proof that what you’re witnessing in Minnesota is the beginning of a Color Revolution. Clip Tucker Full Show

MJTruthUltra

929,992 次观看 • 6 个月前

This answer by the Reserve Bank governor on the Rand Manipulation by the Forex Cartel banks doesn’t persuade me. 1. Section 224 of the constitution says the Reserve Bank has a constitutional mandate to preserve the value of the currency. 2. The website says - The SARB is responsible for regulating cross-border transactions, preventing the abuse of the financial system and supporting the regulation of financial institutions. 3. They have the Prudential Authority whose role is to regulates financial institutions and market infrastructures to promote and enhance their safety and soundness, and support financial stability. 4. You can’t abdicate that to the competition commission exclusively. Also the Reserve Bank has more resources and technical capacity to monitor and investigate this kind of bank malpractice. 5. I would say that the commission of inquiry in 2002 was effective. In 1999 the rate was 1:6 by 2001 the rate was now 1:11. There was clear tampering and after the inquiry it was stopped the rate went back to 1:5 by 2004. 6. The Rand has lost 44% of its value since 2010. Why would the Reserve Bank not be concerned about that and fail to move proactively? Why wait for international reports when there is a downward trend for over 4 years? Why rely on an international code and not investigate local banks and actively push them to comply? The bank is very active in raising interest rates in the name of protecting the Rand. They seem to take an opposite approach when banks are responsible for devaluation of the Rand.
5:27

This answer by the Reserve Bank governor on the Rand Manipulation by the Forex Cartel banks doesn’t persuade me. 1. Section 224 of the constitution says the Reserve Bank has a constitutional mandate to preserve the value of the currency. 2. The website says - The SARB is responsible for regulating cross-border transactions, preventing the abuse of the financial system and supporting the regulation of financial institutions. 3. They have the Prudential Authority whose role is to regulates financial institutions and market infrastructures to promote and enhance their safety and soundness, and support financial stability. 4. You can’t abdicate that to the competition commission exclusively. Also the Reserve Bank has more resources and technical capacity to monitor and investigate this kind of bank malpractice. 5. I would say that the commission of inquiry in 2002 was effective. In 1999 the rate was 1:6 by 2001 the rate was now 1:11. There was clear tampering and after the inquiry it was stopped the rate went back to 1:5 by 2004. 6. The Rand has lost 44% of its value since 2010. Why would the Reserve Bank not be concerned about that and fail to move proactively? Why wait for international reports when there is a downward trend for over 4 years? Why rely on an international code and not investigate local banks and actively push them to comply? The bank is very active in raising interest rates in the name of protecting the Rand. They seem to take an opposite approach when banks are responsible for devaluation of the Rand.

Africa Research Desk

621,589 次观看 • 2 年前

Joe Biden’s FBI and DOJ targeted an ex-Amazon employee for an alleged breach of contract The FBI actually came to her home, knocked on her door and raided her home over an Amazon employment contract “You probably didn't know this could happen in America, but oligarchs can actually hire former prosecutors to try to put Americans in prison.” She explains in the video her husbands position at Amazon and the contract he signed while leaving “Anyway, about a year later, the FBI knocks on our door and tells my husband Amazon is accusing him of a federal crime. What's the federal crime? Doing what his employment contracts said he could do. Starting a company and doing business with entities that were doing business with Amazon.” “We learned later that the DOJ never asked Amazon to see my husband's employment contract. So they said my husband criminally violated his employment terms, but the prosecutors actually didn't ask to see the contract, which is pretty wild. — I can prove all of this in writing. The DOJ admitted to us later in writing that they didn't have the contract. — based on the lies about my husband, the DOJ seized all of our bank accounts. So in America, the government can take your money on the suspicion of a crime, even if they don't charge you or prove it. So the government took all of our bank accounts. We had four little girls who were under six” “There are multiple emails where the Amazon lawyers are directing the FBI to subpoena Amazon for certain information. They're like running the investigation.” Why is Amazon directing The FBI to do anything? Why are they even working with The FBI? This case is absolutely WILD and I highly recommend listening to it. We are ruled in America, that is very clear.
9:11

Joe Biden’s FBI and DOJ targeted an ex-Amazon employee for an alleged breach of contract The FBI actually came to her home, knocked on her door and raided her home over an Amazon employment contract “You probably didn't know this could happen in America, but oligarchs can actually hire former prosecutors to try to put Americans in prison.” She explains in the video her husbands position at Amazon and the contract he signed while leaving “Anyway, about a year later, the FBI knocks on our door and tells my husband Amazon is accusing him of a federal crime. What's the federal crime? Doing what his employment contracts said he could do. Starting a company and doing business with entities that were doing business with Amazon.” “We learned later that the DOJ never asked Amazon to see my husband's employment contract. So they said my husband criminally violated his employment terms, but the prosecutors actually didn't ask to see the contract, which is pretty wild. — I can prove all of this in writing. The DOJ admitted to us later in writing that they didn't have the contract. — based on the lies about my husband, the DOJ seized all of our bank accounts. So in America, the government can take your money on the suspicion of a crime, even if they don't charge you or prove it. So the government took all of our bank accounts. We had four little girls who were under six” “There are multiple emails where the Amazon lawyers are directing the FBI to subpoena Amazon for certain information. They're like running the investigation.” Why is Amazon directing The FBI to do anything? Why are they even working with The FBI? This case is absolutely WILD and I highly recommend listening to it. We are ruled in America, that is very clear.

Wall Street Apes

197,318 次观看 • 1 年前

“There are accusations of a scam, but I don't understand what the scam is. Was there a financial loss? Was any money stolen? Please explain the scam to me, and then I will answer your questions. Is buying bonds a scam? Is selling bonds a scam? Or did the governor of the central bank secretly take the money and give it to his son-in-law? What scam has happened here? In February 2015, the central bank requested bonds for 1 billion rupees. They ended up buying 10 billion rupees worth of bonds. Most of the bonds went to Perpetual Treasuries, one of the main bidders, a company that was owned by the governor's son-in-law. This is what these people are calling a scam. Some people say that 11 billion rupees were lost. These are just stories. 12 billion rupees worth of bonds were in the Central Bank's Perpetual Treasuries account. We took control of that account. That is the background of this. Have you read the commission report? The commission report says that Arjuna Mahendran was a suitable person for the post of governor of the central bank. The only issue was whether there was improper communication between the governor and his son-in-law which still needs to be proven. The decision to buy the bonds was made that night, and the bonds were bought the next day. Perpetual Treasuries says that there was no improper communication. They say that this kind of thing has happened before, under the previous governor of the central bank when the sister of the owner of the Perpetual Treasuries was serving as a Board of Director of the CBSL. Second, the central bank was offered 20 billion rupees worth of bonds. The governor said to take 20 billion rupees worth of bonds, but the officials of the CBSL only wanted to take 5 billion rupees worth of bonds. They discussed it, and in the end, they agreed to take 10 billion rupees worth of bonds. Everyone agreed to buy 10 billion rupees worth of bonds. The main issue here is that we had not decided on a price. The company officials say that they got the information about the price from the Bank of Ceylon. The Pitipana report also says to look into the Bank of Ceylon. These are the facts. Is that clear? All of this is in the commission report. Not a penny was lost. So where is the scam? The absence of a loss does not necessarily mean that there was no scam. The presence of a loss does not automatically make something a crime. The media has been sensationalizing this story and portraying this as a major scam, but they do not seem to have a clear understanding of the scam they are reporting on. They are all talking about things they do not know. I am the one who with the advice of the Attorney General instructed the Criminal Investigation Department to investigate whether there had been any scam.” The Battle | Ranil Wickremesinghe | 31.07.2020
7:24

“There are accusations of a scam, but I don't understand what the scam is. Was there a financial loss? Was any money stolen? Please explain the scam to me, and then I will answer your questions. Is buying bonds a scam? Is selling bonds a scam? Or did the governor of the central bank secretly take the money and give it to his son-in-law? What scam has happened here? In February 2015, the central bank requested bonds for 1 billion rupees. They ended up buying 10 billion rupees worth of bonds. Most of the bonds went to Perpetual Treasuries, one of the main bidders, a company that was owned by the governor's son-in-law. This is what these people are calling a scam. Some people say that 11 billion rupees were lost. These are just stories. 12 billion rupees worth of bonds were in the Central Bank's Perpetual Treasuries account. We took control of that account. That is the background of this. Have you read the commission report? The commission report says that Arjuna Mahendran was a suitable person for the post of governor of the central bank. The only issue was whether there was improper communication between the governor and his son-in-law which still needs to be proven. The decision to buy the bonds was made that night, and the bonds were bought the next day. Perpetual Treasuries says that there was no improper communication. They say that this kind of thing has happened before, under the previous governor of the central bank when the sister of the owner of the Perpetual Treasuries was serving as a Board of Director of the CBSL. Second, the central bank was offered 20 billion rupees worth of bonds. The governor said to take 20 billion rupees worth of bonds, but the officials of the CBSL only wanted to take 5 billion rupees worth of bonds. They discussed it, and in the end, they agreed to take 10 billion rupees worth of bonds. Everyone agreed to buy 10 billion rupees worth of bonds. The main issue here is that we had not decided on a price. The company officials say that they got the information about the price from the Bank of Ceylon. The Pitipana report also says to look into the Bank of Ceylon. These are the facts. Is that clear? All of this is in the commission report. Not a penny was lost. So where is the scam? The absence of a loss does not necessarily mean that there was no scam. The presence of a loss does not automatically make something a crime. The media has been sensationalizing this story and portraying this as a major scam, but they do not seem to have a clear understanding of the scam they are reporting on. They are all talking about things they do not know. I am the one who with the advice of the Attorney General instructed the Criminal Investigation Department to investigate whether there had been any scam.” The Battle | Ranil Wickremesinghe | 31.07.2020

Kulanthi Silva

29,712 次观看 • 3 年前

Imagine walking into a bank and convincing top executives to hand you $242 million to build an airport that never existed. That is exactly what Emmanuel Nwude, a businessman from Abagana in Anambra State, did in one of the biggest financial scams in history. In the mid 1990s, Nwude allegedly posed as the Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria and convinced officials of Brazil’s Banco Noroeste that he could facilitate a lucrative Nigerian government airport project in Abuja. He promised massive returns and even dangled a personal commission to one of the bank’s executives. The bank believed him. Over time, they transferred about $242 million into accounts controlled by Nwude and his associates. There was just one problem. The airport did not exist. The fraud was only uncovered years later during an audit connected to the bank’s acquisition. By then, the money was gone, the scandal had become international news, and the bank eventually collapsed under the weight of the losses. Nwude was later arrested, prosecuted, and sentenced in Nigeria. To this day, the case remains one of the most astonishing examples of how confidence, deception, and carefully crafted lies can outsmart even experienced financial executives. Sometimes, the biggest scams don’t rely on force. They rely on making smart people believe an impossible story.
0:26

Imagine walking into a bank and convincing top executives to hand you $242 million to build an airport that never existed. That is exactly what Emmanuel Nwude, a businessman from Abagana in Anambra State, did in one of the biggest financial scams in history. In the mid 1990s, Nwude allegedly posed as the Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria and convinced officials of Brazil’s Banco Noroeste that he could facilitate a lucrative Nigerian government airport project in Abuja. He promised massive returns and even dangled a personal commission to one of the bank’s executives. The bank believed him. Over time, they transferred about $242 million into accounts controlled by Nwude and his associates. There was just one problem. The airport did not exist. The fraud was only uncovered years later during an audit connected to the bank’s acquisition. By then, the money was gone, the scandal had become international news, and the bank eventually collapsed under the weight of the losses. Nwude was later arrested, prosecuted, and sentenced in Nigeria. To this day, the case remains one of the most astonishing examples of how confidence, deception, and carefully crafted lies can outsmart even experienced financial executives. Sometimes, the biggest scams don’t rely on force. They rely on making smart people believe an impossible story.

High Chief Lawrence Igbins Okoro

12,688 次观看 • 13 天前

Remember what The Federal Reserve Act of 1913(Centralized Banking) took from us as American Citizens. The ability to have Economic veto power from bonds a direct will of the people without bureaucracy oversight. Now the government get to subvert the will of the people through central banking cartels, like the federal reserve. That's a misnomer, they're no more federal than the federal express. The concept of "economic veto power" from bonds, as discussed in the context of pre-1913 U.S. financial systems, refers to the ability of citizens to influence government spending decisions through their participation in the bond market. "So in 1913, a convenient new arrangement was made. The Federal Reserve Act created an unlimited credit line for the federal United States government to borrow directly from the Federal Reserve Bank and obligated the American people to pay it back, completely bypassing our veto power. They no longer had to come to us directly to ask permission to fund something. They went directly to the bank. Prior to 1913, the American people had direct veto power over the spending policies of the federal government because, in order for the federal government to borrow any money, it had to go to the people. There was no central bank it could go to. It had to sell bonds. If you didn't want to go to war, you didn't buy the bonds. If you didn't want the pork project that the government had in mind, you didn't buy the bonds. It was a very simple system, a republican system whereby you had veto power, economic veto power, and it worked very well until 1913. That's how the government managed to stay small because it didn't have an unlimited credit line to go on a shopping spree for 80 years and make you pay for it."
1:09

Remember what The Federal Reserve Act of 1913(Centralized Banking) took from us as American Citizens. The ability to have Economic veto power from bonds a direct will of the people without bureaucracy oversight. Now the government get to subvert the will of the people through central banking cartels, like the federal reserve. That's a misnomer, they're no more federal than the federal express. The concept of "economic veto power" from bonds, as discussed in the context of pre-1913 U.S. financial systems, refers to the ability of citizens to influence government spending decisions through their participation in the bond market. "So in 1913, a convenient new arrangement was made. The Federal Reserve Act created an unlimited credit line for the federal United States government to borrow directly from the Federal Reserve Bank and obligated the American people to pay it back, completely bypassing our veto power. They no longer had to come to us directly to ask permission to fund something. They went directly to the bank. Prior to 1913, the American people had direct veto power over the spending policies of the federal government because, in order for the federal government to borrow any money, it had to go to the people. There was no central bank it could go to. It had to sell bonds. If you didn't want to go to war, you didn't buy the bonds. If you didn't want the pork project that the government had in mind, you didn't buy the bonds. It was a very simple system, a republican system whereby you had veto power, economic veto power, and it worked very well until 1913. That's how the government managed to stay small because it didn't have an unlimited credit line to go on a shopping spree for 80 years and make you pay for it."

Ꭷʀɨօռ

16,599 次观看 • 1 年前

🔥" WE KNOW THESE ARE THE BAD GUYS. FBI YOU NEED TO DROP THE RELATIONSHIP. KASH YOU DID WITH THE ADL...SPLC IS NEXT AS CHARLIE SAID # 2" - Jack Posobiec Jack Poso 🇺🇸 , Blake Neff & Andrew Kolvet are talking about the PRESSURE POINTS OF THE SPLC. Jack notes AMAZON SMILE is partnered with the SPLC. Andrew Kolvet discusses a HIDDEN ENDOWMENT in the Caribbean and they call it the Alabama HQ is called "THE POVERTY PALACE" and he approximated at 822 MILLION DOLLARS. WOWW. Blake Neff brought out that it is a MONEY FLEECING SCHEME for boomers. Blake Neff discusses that Charlie in his own book pointed this out. Former staffers have said they are ripping off members and "THEY ARE A CON". They even had a "GET THE NRA" division in the New York AG office. Jack makes the great point that ALABAMA where they are HQed is a RED STATE on the "GULF OF AMERICA". Andrew reminds us that Coach Tommy Tubberville is running from Alabama and its important for us to take back red states at the LEADERSHIP LEVEL. Adam is SPOT ON RIGHT HERE where we need to "Learn to leverage our power because progressives love to punish their enemy while conservatives are not wired that way." Adam says we are sick of it because people are getting KILLED OUT HERE. Jack discusses FLOYD LEE CORKINS in 2012 went to the Family Research Council in D.C. BUT PRIOR to the attempted shooting attempt WENT TO CHICK-FIL-A to buy sandwiches to SMEAR on potential victims because the SPLC labeled them a hate organization. "THIS IS THE REDDEST OF THE RED STATES AND THE POVERTY PALACE IS JUST SITTING THERE BUILT ON ONE OF OUR STATE LIKE AN OCCUPYING FORCE" - Jack Posobiec
9:33

🔥" WE KNOW THESE ARE THE BAD GUYS. FBI YOU NEED TO DROP THE RELATIONSHIP. KASH YOU DID WITH THE ADL...SPLC IS NEXT AS CHARLIE SAID # 2" - Jack Posobiec Jack Poso 🇺🇸 , Blake Neff & Andrew Kolvet are talking about the PRESSURE POINTS OF THE SPLC. Jack notes AMAZON SMILE is partnered with the SPLC. Andrew Kolvet discusses a HIDDEN ENDOWMENT in the Caribbean and they call it the Alabama HQ is called "THE POVERTY PALACE" and he approximated at 822 MILLION DOLLARS. WOWW. Blake Neff brought out that it is a MONEY FLEECING SCHEME for boomers. Blake Neff discusses that Charlie in his own book pointed this out. Former staffers have said they are ripping off members and "THEY ARE A CON". They even had a "GET THE NRA" division in the New York AG office. Jack makes the great point that ALABAMA where they are HQed is a RED STATE on the "GULF OF AMERICA". Andrew reminds us that Coach Tommy Tubberville is running from Alabama and its important for us to take back red states at the LEADERSHIP LEVEL. Adam is SPOT ON RIGHT HERE where we need to "Learn to leverage our power because progressives love to punish their enemy while conservatives are not wired that way." Adam says we are sick of it because people are getting KILLED OUT HERE. Jack discusses FLOYD LEE CORKINS in 2012 went to the Family Research Council in D.C. BUT PRIOR to the attempted shooting attempt WENT TO CHICK-FIL-A to buy sandwiches to SMEAR on potential victims because the SPLC labeled them a hate organization. "THIS IS THE REDDEST OF THE RED STATES AND THE POVERTY PALACE IS JUST SITTING THERE BUILT ON ONE OF OUR STATE LIKE AN OCCUPYING FORCE" - Jack Posobiec

Johnny St.Pete

46,895 次观看 • 10 个月前

🧠PROFOUND: Former hedge fund manager David Rogers Webb describes how the central banks are "the true seat of power" and have aimed to "sever [us] from understanding that our minds create reality" "The mind is very powerful. And the people that are controlling this system, they are using their minds to manifest what is happening to us" "[they want us to think that] you can't know anything beyond the material world. So don't bother your pretty little head with that. Just focus on output and numbers and determinism" "But... I believe people in deep time knew that the material world is actually benevolent. The material world is not going to destroy you. What will destroy you and your family is what is created by people's minds" This clip of Webb (David Rogers Webb), who's also the author of a book dubbed The Great Taking, is taken from a FrihetsNytt interview posted to Rumble in May 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "We have been severed from understanding that our minds create reality. Beginning with Marx and dialectical materialism in the 19th century. This is very important that, prior to that, in Hegelian dialectics, the point of Hegelian dialectics was to know the truth, to know reality through argumentation. "And the understanding was that those participating in the argumentation desired to know the truth and the good and the reality. Marx could not have that. The dialectical materialism says the only good is that the material, material world. "And you can't know anything beyond the material world. So don't bother your pretty little head with that. Just focus on output and numbers and determinism. "It caused people to feel, Yeah, I can't know anything about, I'm a realist. I'm a realist. I'll be rooted in hard reality. It goes along with ideas of determinism and materialism. But the point is that, I believe people in deep time knew that the material world is actually benevolent. "The material world is not going to destroy you. What will destroy you and your family is what is created by people's minds. Now, how powerful is the mind? Literally everything [including what] we're sitting [on] in here was created by the mind. Everything we're wearing, all our surroundings. And anyone watching this, look around where you are, unless you're out in a field somewhere. "The mind is very powerful. And the people that are controlling this system, they are using their minds to manifest what is happening to us. And they're using our minds as well.... "[And] clearly the seat of power is the central banks. It's as simple as that. The Bank for International Settlements is the— On their webpage they say that they are the central bank of central banks. "So what is the Bank for International Settlements? So the City of London, probably this began in the City of London. And the Rothschilds are involved with that. "And there are other banking, ancient banking families. But, the Bank for International Settlements was formed after World War I to collect all the reparations from Germany. So they sucked all that out of Germany. "But when you think about it, what had also just happened? The collapse of the Romanov dynasty. The collapse of the— Habsburg The Habsburg Empire. The Turk Ottoman Empire collapsed. So what happened to all of that wealth? Where did that go? It just kind of disappeared. Well, it's in the— It is controlled by the people who control the central banks."
4:18

🧠PROFOUND: Former hedge fund manager David Rogers Webb describes how the central banks are "the true seat of power" and have aimed to "sever [us] from understanding that our minds create reality" "The mind is very powerful. And the people that are controlling this system, they are using their minds to manifest what is happening to us" "[they want us to think that] you can't know anything beyond the material world. So don't bother your pretty little head with that. Just focus on output and numbers and determinism" "But... I believe people in deep time knew that the material world is actually benevolent. The material world is not going to destroy you. What will destroy you and your family is what is created by people's minds" This clip of Webb (David Rogers Webb), who's also the author of a book dubbed The Great Taking, is taken from a FrihetsNytt interview posted to Rumble in May 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "We have been severed from understanding that our minds create reality. Beginning with Marx and dialectical materialism in the 19th century. This is very important that, prior to that, in Hegelian dialectics, the point of Hegelian dialectics was to know the truth, to know reality through argumentation. "And the understanding was that those participating in the argumentation desired to know the truth and the good and the reality. Marx could not have that. The dialectical materialism says the only good is that the material, material world. "And you can't know anything beyond the material world. So don't bother your pretty little head with that. Just focus on output and numbers and determinism. "It caused people to feel, Yeah, I can't know anything about, I'm a realist. I'm a realist. I'll be rooted in hard reality. It goes along with ideas of determinism and materialism. But the point is that, I believe people in deep time knew that the material world is actually benevolent. "The material world is not going to destroy you. What will destroy you and your family is what is created by people's minds. Now, how powerful is the mind? Literally everything [including what] we're sitting [on] in here was created by the mind. Everything we're wearing, all our surroundings. And anyone watching this, look around where you are, unless you're out in a field somewhere. "The mind is very powerful. And the people that are controlling this system, they are using their minds to manifest what is happening to us. And they're using our minds as well.... "[And] clearly the seat of power is the central banks. It's as simple as that. The Bank for International Settlements is the— On their webpage they say that they are the central bank of central banks. "So what is the Bank for International Settlements? So the City of London, probably this began in the City of London. And the Rothschilds are involved with that. "And there are other banking, ancient banking families. But, the Bank for International Settlements was formed after World War I to collect all the reparations from Germany. So they sucked all that out of Germany. "But when you think about it, what had also just happened? The collapse of the Romanov dynasty. The collapse of the— Habsburg The Habsburg Empire. The Turk Ottoman Empire collapsed. So what happened to all of that wealth? Where did that go? It just kind of disappeared. Well, it's in the— It is controlled by the people who control the central banks."

Sense Receptor

40,751 次观看 • 1 个月前

The Trump admin is GASLIGHTING us re: no CBDCs They know they can't do CBDCs because of the Constitution, so they're backdooring them with stablecoins Iain Davis explains— "the idea of a [CBDC] is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system" "CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it" "That's not going to work in the US because... it's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote... to coin money" "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work-round" "So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank" "stablecoins... slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency" "Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose, as central bank digital currency" This clip of Iain Davis (InThisTogether), author of The Technocratic Dark State, is taken from a Flashlights podcast (Flashlights Podcast) episode posted to Rumble on May 17, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "It's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote, it says this in the Constitution, to coin money. So the power to coin money is overseen by the people. "Now the idea of a central bank digital currency is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system. That's CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it. "That's not going to work in the US because even though Congress, you know, Congress is the, is the dog which is wagged by the tail in this of the Fed, the Fed, you know, the Fed tells Congress what to do, not the other way round. But theoretically it could be the other way round. And theoretically the people could assert their control over the Fed if they only knew about it, which, not many people do, but they could do it, right? It's in the US Constitution. "Now that's a problem if you're going to embark on a global transformation of the entire international monetary and financial system when your leading reserve currency is the US dollar. So that's, you know, that could all go wrong very badly. "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work round. How are you, how are you going to do which for the, you know, I, for many years, well, since central bank digital currency has been something that I've been looking at, I couldn't figure out why the US wasn't more enthusiastic about central bank digital currency. "Because it's the type of thing that the US administrations are usually right up— You know, they're really gung ho about that kind of centralized control of everything. That's right up their alley. So why, why don't they like it? And then it was the work of John Titus who pointed out this problem that they've got in the US with the Constitution that made me look at that and think, right. And then I started investigating that further. And he's right about that. That is a problem. "But then they obviously need some sort of workaround. How are they going to have. Because the main point of central bank digital currency from the surveillance and control aspect is that we will all need digital identity in order to access our digital wallets, which will contain the currency and the currency and the wallets and our, digital identities will all be programmable so conditions can be set on everything that we do. "Every transaction we make will be subject to condition through some sort of smart contract probably, which will control it. Right. So you know, if you say the wrong thing or you know, you, you just write the wrong thing online, you could be punished by algorithm by controlling your access to money... "And so the key to that is central bank— the programmability of central bank digital currency. But obviously that's not going to, may not work. There's a good chance that won't work in the United States which has got the US dollar reserve is an important currency. "So what are you going to do? So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank. So or in the case of stablecoins, a non-bank, a non-bank institution like Tether. So it's not a bank. "But you can use stablecoins for exactly the same. They slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency. Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose as central bank digital currency or the other version, the commercial bank version is deposit tokens. Any of those will do. "Now in the US they've gone down the stablecoin route so they can issue the stablecoins which will be backed by US Treasuries, just like the dollar or just like any kind of dollar instrument will be one to one convertible for the US dollar. So the stablecoins are effectively the US dollar in, in digital form. "But instead of calling it a central bank digital currency, they call it issued by, it wouldn't have to be issued by the Fed. They call it a stablecoin, which is issued by a company like Tether or you know, someone like that. So it's the same system but using a workaround. And that workaround came with the Genius Act which, which came from an executive order that Trump made when he first came to office. "Because the Americans, quite rightly when they were electing their president, were concerned about central bank digital currency. I mean anyone that understands what it is should be terrified of it. So they didn't want it, and Trump promised that they wouldn't have it. Probably. I don't know whether he knew, but certainly the gaggle of technocrats that were around him knew that they weren't going down that path. Anyway, no chance of the US introducing it because of these problems we've just outlined."
6:11

The Trump admin is GASLIGHTING us re: no CBDCs They know they can't do CBDCs because of the Constitution, so they're backdooring them with stablecoins Iain Davis explains— "the idea of a [CBDC] is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system" "CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it" "That's not going to work in the US because... it's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote... to coin money" "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work-round" "So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank" "stablecoins... slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency" "Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose, as central bank digital currency" This clip of Iain Davis (InThisTogether), author of The Technocratic Dark State, is taken from a Flashlights podcast (Flashlights Podcast) episode posted to Rumble on May 17, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "It's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote, it says this in the Constitution, to coin money. So the power to coin money is overseen by the people. "Now the idea of a central bank digital currency is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system. That's CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it. "That's not going to work in the US because even though Congress, you know, Congress is the, is the dog which is wagged by the tail in this of the Fed, the Fed, you know, the Fed tells Congress what to do, not the other way round. But theoretically it could be the other way round. And theoretically the people could assert their control over the Fed if they only knew about it, which, not many people do, but they could do it, right? It's in the US Constitution. "Now that's a problem if you're going to embark on a global transformation of the entire international monetary and financial system when your leading reserve currency is the US dollar. So that's, you know, that could all go wrong very badly. "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work round. How are you, how are you going to do which for the, you know, I, for many years, well, since central bank digital currency has been something that I've been looking at, I couldn't figure out why the US wasn't more enthusiastic about central bank digital currency. "Because it's the type of thing that the US administrations are usually right up— You know, they're really gung ho about that kind of centralized control of everything. That's right up their alley. So why, why don't they like it? And then it was the work of John Titus who pointed out this problem that they've got in the US with the Constitution that made me look at that and think, right. And then I started investigating that further. And he's right about that. That is a problem. "But then they obviously need some sort of workaround. How are they going to have. Because the main point of central bank digital currency from the surveillance and control aspect is that we will all need digital identity in order to access our digital wallets, which will contain the currency and the currency and the wallets and our, digital identities will all be programmable so conditions can be set on everything that we do. "Every transaction we make will be subject to condition through some sort of smart contract probably, which will control it. Right. So you know, if you say the wrong thing or you know, you, you just write the wrong thing online, you could be punished by algorithm by controlling your access to money... "And so the key to that is central bank— the programmability of central bank digital currency. But obviously that's not going to, may not work. There's a good chance that won't work in the United States which has got the US dollar reserve is an important currency. "So what are you going to do? So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank. So or in the case of stablecoins, a non-bank, a non-bank institution like Tether. So it's not a bank. "But you can use stablecoins for exactly the same. They slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency. Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose as central bank digital currency or the other version, the commercial bank version is deposit tokens. Any of those will do. "Now in the US they've gone down the stablecoin route so they can issue the stablecoins which will be backed by US Treasuries, just like the dollar or just like any kind of dollar instrument will be one to one convertible for the US dollar. So the stablecoins are effectively the US dollar in, in digital form. "But instead of calling it a central bank digital currency, they call it issued by, it wouldn't have to be issued by the Fed. They call it a stablecoin, which is issued by a company like Tether or you know, someone like that. So it's the same system but using a workaround. And that workaround came with the Genius Act which, which came from an executive order that Trump made when he first came to office. "Because the Americans, quite rightly when they were electing their president, were concerned about central bank digital currency. I mean anyone that understands what it is should be terrified of it. So they didn't want it, and Trump promised that they wouldn't have it. Probably. I don't know whether he knew, but certainly the gaggle of technocrats that were around him knew that they weren't going down that path. Anyway, no chance of the US introducing it because of these problems we've just outlined."

Sense Receptor

13,996 次观看 • 2 个月前