正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

MiniMax H3 vs Seedance 2.0 — right inside Pollo AI. Same prompt, same settings, completely different results. The only variable? The model. MiniMax H3 delivers smoother, more natural motion, while Seedance 2.0 goes bold with a cinematic, high-impact feel. It proves that within Pollo AI, the model you choose... show more

Lydia

63,658 subscribers

57,997 次观看 • 2 天前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术教育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Still choosing the right AI video model? You don’t have to. Same prompt. Kling 3.0. Seedance 2.0. StarDream 2.0. Different strengths. Different results. All in one place — SeaArt

Still choosing the right AI video model? You don’t have to. Same prompt. Kling 3.0. Seedance 2.0. StarDream 2.0. Different strengths. Different results. All in one place — SeaArt

SeaArt.Ai🐋

22,771 次观看 • 1 个月前

SEEDANCE 2.5 SIDE BY SIDE WITH 2.0 same prompt, same scene, completely different result. 2.0 already looked good, 2.5 looks like a different generation of tech. 7 days of unlimited Seedance 2.0 in 4K, the most premium Seedance model, then switch to Seedance 2.5 for 7 more days. Seedance 2.5 coming soon on Higgsfield.

SEEDANCE 2.5 SIDE BY SIDE WITH 2.0 same prompt, same scene, completely different result. 2.0 already looked good, 2.5 looks like a different generation of tech. 7 days of unlimited Seedance 2.0 in 4K, the most premium Seedance model, then switch to Seedance 2.5 for 7 more days. Seedance 2.5 coming soon on Higgsfield.

marcus

68,861 次观看 • 8 天前

"A giant prehistoric beast wakes up in the desert. Opens its mouth. And roars." We ran the same prompt across different models inside Pollo — Seedance 1.5 Pro, Kling 3.0, Pollo 2.5, Sora 2, Veo 3.1 Same prompt. Different beasts. Same words. Different worlds. Which one actually directed the scene? Vote for your favorite model.

"A giant prehistoric beast wakes up in the desert. Opens its mouth. And roars." We ran the same prompt across different models inside Pollo — Seedance 1.5 Pro, Kling 3.0, Pollo 2.5, Sora 2, Veo 3.1 Same prompt. Different beasts. Same words. Different worlds. Which one actually directed the scene? Vote for your favorite model.

Pollo AI

15,079 次观看 • 4 个月前

The model everyone’s been waiting for is here. Seedance 2.5 is now on Pollo AI. To get the 50% OFF discount: Like Follow Pollo AI Comment “SD2.5” You’ll have a chance to get 50% OFF. Check your DMs later. Create more, Spend less, on Pollo AI!

The model everyone’s been waiting for is here. Seedance 2.5 is now on Pollo AI. To get the 50% OFF discount: Like Follow Pollo AI Comment “SD2.5” You’ll have a chance to get 50% OFF. Check your DMs later. Create more, Spend less, on Pollo AI!

Pollo AI

191,159 次观看 • 2 天前

Seedance 2.5 has been a game changer in my AI video workflow. The movement feels more natural, characters stay consistent, and prompts translate much closer to what I actually want. I’m getting stronger results with fewer retries, which makes the whole process much smoother. Now you can use Seedance 2.5 on Pollo AI with 50% OFF Try it here :

Seedance 2.5 has been a game changer in my AI video workflow. The movement feels more natural, characters stay consistent, and prompts translate much closer to what I actually want. I’m getting stronger results with fewer retries, which makes the whole process much smoother. Now you can use Seedance 2.5 on Pollo AI with 50% OFF Try it here :

liana

17,674 次观看 • 1 天前

Tested the exact same prompt on Seedance 2.0 vs. Omni Flash, and the results are wild. 🤯 Both have their weird little AI mutations (we all know the struggle lol), but the biggest shocker? Omni Flash generated this instantly with zero censorship, while Seedance 2.0 threw a fit and tried to ban the prompt. 💀 Dropping the exact prompt in the thread below 👇 Next up, I’m gonna push them harder with some crazy dynamic animation. Which model do you think won this round? tbh I’m torn.

Tested the exact same prompt on Seedance 2.0 vs. Omni Flash, and the results are wild. 🤯 Both have their weird little AI mutations (we all know the struggle lol), but the biggest shocker? Omni Flash generated this instantly with zero censorship, while Seedance 2.0 threw a fit and tried to ban the prompt. 💀 Dropping the exact prompt in the thread below 👇 Next up, I’m gonna push them harder with some crazy dynamic animation. Which model do you think won this round? tbh I’m torn.

Ivanna | AI Art & Prompts

38,463 次观看 • 2 个月前

Flova now integrates Seedance 2.0 — unlocking next-level AI video creation. With Seedance 2.0, you get: • High-quality, long-form video generation • Strong motion consistency and cinematic output • Faster generation with significantly improved efficiency Flova also introduces a new Quick Access feature — instantly launch Seedance 2.0 or even NanoBanana with just one click. No complex setup, no prompt engineering required. And the best part? Lower cost, higher value — create more, spend less. #Flovaai #Seedance #aivideo

Flova now integrates Seedance 2.0 — unlocking next-level AI video creation. With Seedance 2.0, you get: • High-quality, long-form video generation • Strong motion consistency and cinematic output • Faster generation with significantly improved efficiency Flova also introduces a new Quick Access feature — instantly launch Seedance 2.0 or even NanoBanana with just one click. No complex setup, no prompt engineering required. And the best part? Lower cost, higher value — create more, spend less. #Flovaai #Seedance #aivideo

FlovaAI

475,640 次观看 • 4 个月前

If you’re still paying premium prices for AI video… you’re getting robbed. Just ran a full Seedance 2.0 generation on Pollo AI and it cost me $0.11 — ELEVEN CENTS! Most tools hit you with $1.50–$2.50 for the same thing. This price gap is actually wild once you start scaling.

If you’re still paying premium prices for AI video… you’re getting robbed. Just ran a full Seedance 2.0 generation on Pollo AI and it cost me $0.11 — ELEVEN CENTS! Most tools hit you with $1.50–$2.50 for the same thing. This price gap is actually wild once you start scaling.

Kumail Sikandar

13,518 次观看 • 2 个月前

Your AI sucks. And it's not the model. It's you. "Make it better" isn't a prompt, it's a guessing game. I changed one step in my process and the output quality completely flipped. Same ideas, same models, totally different results.

Your AI sucks. And it's not the model. It's you. "Make it better" isn't a prompt, it's a guessing game. I changed one step in my process and the output quality completely flipped. Same ideas, same models, totally different results.

Flick

322,001 次观看 • 22 天前

let me show you an ad I made for a French client I mostly used Seedance 2, but for the first shot, it was impossible to get clean text motion while scrolling on the phone. I ended up using Minimax H3 instead, and it was much better

let me show you an ad I made for a French client I mostly used Seedance 2, but for the first shot, it was impossible to get clean text motion while scrolling on the phone. I ended up using Minimax H3 instead, and it was much better

INK

73,737 次观看 • 8 天前

MiniMax H3 Just Dropped on Lovart! 🔥 The world's #2 video model just landed on Lovart. Production-quality AI video at less than half the cost. •15s cinematic output with fluid, high-fidelity motion •15multimodal references: text, image, video & audio •Consistent characters, products, scenes & styles From Ads to MV to TVC, no more choosing between quality and cost.

MiniMax H3 Just Dropped on Lovart! 🔥 The world's #2 video model just landed on Lovart. Production-quality AI video at less than half the cost. •15s cinematic output with fluid, high-fidelity motion •15multimodal references: text, image, video & audio •Consistent characters, products, scenes & styles From Ads to MV to TVC, no more choosing between quality and cost.

LovartAI

241,199 次观看 • 9 天前

🎬 Want to create cinematic AI videos in seconds? Here’s exactly how I do it using Seedance 2.0 on Yapper: Most people get this wrong… your results depend on how well you *direct* the AI. Here’s the workflow 👇 ✅ Step 1: Open Yapper Go to Create → Video ✅ Step 2: Choose your model Select Seedance 2.0 This model delivers smooth motion, dynamic camera angles, realistic lighting, and strong scene consistency. ✅ Step 3: Write a strong prompt Your prompt is your director. Be specific: Camera movement (pan, zoom, tracking shot) Lighting (golden hour, neon, soft shadows) Environment (city, desert, luxury interior) ✅ Step 4: Add a reference image (optional) Use this to guide style, composition, or subject for more control and consistency. ✅ Step 5: Hit Generate In seconds, your idea turns into a cinematic sequence. 🚀 Pro tip: If it’s not perfect, tweak your prompt — small changes = big difference. From idea → cinematic video in seconds.

🎬 Want to create cinematic AI videos in seconds? Here’s exactly how I do it using Seedance 2.0 on Yapper: Most people get this wrong… your results depend on how well you direct the AI. Here’s the workflow 👇 ✅ Step 1: Open Yapper Go to Create → Video ✅ Step 2: Choose your model Select Seedance 2.0 This model delivers smooth motion, dynamic camera angles, realistic lighting, and strong scene consistency. ✅ Step 3: Write a strong prompt Your prompt is your director. Be specific: Camera movement (pan, zoom, tracking shot) Lighting (golden hour, neon, soft shadows) Environment (city, desert, luxury interior) ✅ Step 4: Add a reference image (optional) Use this to guide style, composition, or subject for more control and consistency. ✅ Step 5: Hit Generate In seconds, your idea turns into a cinematic sequence. 🚀 Pro tip: If it’s not perfect, tweak your prompt — small changes = big difference. From idea → cinematic video in seconds.

Kuria | AI

43,685 次观看 • 3 个月前

Testing four AI video models from the same input image and prompt. The scene: two cybernetic soldiers dueling with energy swords in a rainy neon cyberpunk city. This thread breaks down scene richness, physics, and camera motion for each model. First, a side-by-side comparison video of PixVerse V6 and Seedance 2.0.

Testing four AI video models from the same input image and prompt. The scene: two cybernetic soldiers dueling with energy swords in a rainy neon cyberpunk city. This thread breaks down scene richness, physics, and camera motion for each model. First, a side-by-side comparison video of PixVerse V6 and Seedance 2.0.

Jibril

113,346 次观看 • 3 个月前

One simple watch photo → Pollo AI Mobile App. GPT Image 2 turned it into a flagship-worthy ad — crisp, clean, premium. Then Seedance 2.0 4K brought it to life: ultra-sharp clarity, cinematic motion, dangerously professional. What’s the difference between this and a real storefront ad? Honestly? Not much. If your products are drowning on Amazon, this is your wake-up call.

One simple watch photo → Pollo AI Mobile App. GPT Image 2 turned it into a flagship-worthy ad — crisp, clean, premium. Then Seedance 2.0 4K brought it to life: ultra-sharp clarity, cinematic motion, dangerously professional. What’s the difference between this and a real storefront ad? Honestly? Not much. If your products are drowning on Amazon, this is your wake-up call.

Genz Ai

27,737 次观看 • 1 个月前

Seedance 2.0 VS Kling 3.0! 🔥 Essential comparison to understand the two best models on the market Conclusions and prompt: The generations are radically different, using the same initial and final frames and spaceship elements. I specified that it's a fast-paced, cinematic action scene. But Seedance has created a beautiful, relaxing, high-quality scene. The rendering of the ship's movements is sublime with Seedance; it's a dynamic, cinematic-quality 3D element. The Kling scene conveys the message better; I specified that it should splash in the water. The sounds are good; in Seedance, the sound quality is cinematic. I've added a third shot with Kling and a giant. I used Kling 3.0 at Higgsfield Prompt in comment:

Seedance 2.0 VS Kling 3.0! 🔥 Essential comparison to understand the two best models on the market Conclusions and prompt: The generations are radically different, using the same initial and final frames and spaceship elements. I specified that it's a fast-paced, cinematic action scene. But Seedance has created a beautiful, relaxing, high-quality scene. The rendering of the ship's movements is sublime with Seedance; it's a dynamic, cinematic-quality 3D element. The Kling scene conveys the message better; I specified that it should splash in the water. The sounds are good; in Seedance, the sound quality is cinematic. I've added a third shot with Kling and a giant. I used Kling 3.0 at Higgsfield Prompt in comment:

hedoήist

43,612 次观看 • 5 个月前

Finally got our hands on Seedance 2.0 (through YouArt) and ran it head-to-head with Kling AI 3.0. Here’s what stood out: Seedance 2.0’s physics feel stronger right away. The movement just looks more natural and realistic, especially in bigger physical actions. It also handles continuity across multiple shots from a single prompt better than I expected, which makes scene building a lot easier. And on the audio side, the lip sync generally holds up better than Kling. But here’s the tradeoff: Both models struggle with fine details. Background faces and smaller elements still get a bit messy. Seedance currently outputs at 720p, while Kling 3.0 supports 1080p, so Kling has the edge in overall sharpness. Even with upscaling, Seedance doesn’t fully recover those tiny details. Verdict🏆: Seedance 2.0 is a real step forward, especially for motion realism, but it’s definitely not the “end of Hollywood.” Check out our latest tutorial where we show you how to get access to this new model and take a deep look at the quality of this new AI Video Generator:

Finally got our hands on Seedance 2.0 (through YouArt) and ran it head-to-head with Kling AI 3.0. Here’s what stood out: Seedance 2.0’s physics feel stronger right away. The movement just looks more natural and realistic, especially in bigger physical actions. It also handles continuity across multiple shots from a single prompt better than I expected, which makes scene building a lot easier. And on the audio side, the lip sync generally holds up better than Kling. But here’s the tradeoff: Both models struggle with fine details. Background faces and smaller elements still get a bit messy. Seedance currently outputs at 720p, while Kling 3.0 supports 1080p, so Kling has the edge in overall sharpness. Even with upscaling, Seedance doesn’t fully recover those tiny details. Verdict🏆: Seedance 2.0 is a real step forward, especially for motion realism, but it’s definitely not the “end of Hollywood.” Check out our latest tutorial where we show you how to get access to this new model and take a deep look at the quality of this new AI Video Generator:

Curious Refuge

58,989 次观看 • 5 个月前

This is our second head-to-head test between Kling 3.0 and Seedance 2.0. This time, we pushed both models further, including dialogue-driven Sci-fi comedy shots and even a singing scene. Every single shot was generated using: • The exact same base image • The exact same prompt • No re-generate • No second attempt • No prompt refinements. What you see is the pure first output from each model under identical conditions. So… which one performs better? Seedance 2.0 generated by Ilham Setyawan on BytePlus

This is our second head-to-head test between Kling 3.0 and Seedance 2.0. This time, we pushed both models further, including dialogue-driven Sci-fi comedy shots and even a singing scene. Every single shot was generated using: • The exact same base image • The exact same prompt • No re-generate • No second attempt • No prompt refinements. What you see is the pure first output from each model under identical conditions. So… which one performs better? Seedance 2.0 generated by Ilham Setyawan on BytePlus

Dinda Prasetyo

196,557 次观看 • 5 个月前

Seedance 2.0 - Advanced Workflows Series 11. Cinematic Camera Angles through Video Gen + Specialized Storyboard AI Agent Are you already getting camera shots and angles through Nano Banana Pro? Take the next step. Seedance 2.0 has a better spatial understanding of the scene than image generation models. Because it is built to produce cinematic clips, it achieves more beautiful shots and angles than image models like Nano Banana, which are primarily made for image editing. As an added bonus, Seedance renders the entire space of the scene, so you can get tens of shots with complete spatial and element consistency in a single generation. Create a specific AI Agent to help you with storyboarding, and feed the input into Seedance to get the most cinematic shots. You can access Seedance 2.0 now on insMind (link at the end of the thread). Workflow + Prompts👇

Seedance 2.0 - Advanced Workflows Series 11. Cinematic Camera Angles through Video Gen + Specialized Storyboard AI Agent Are you already getting camera shots and angles through Nano Banana Pro? Take the next step. Seedance 2.0 has a better spatial understanding of the scene than image generation models. Because it is built to produce cinematic clips, it achieves more beautiful shots and angles than image models like Nano Banana, which are primarily made for image editing. As an added bonus, Seedance renders the entire space of the scene, so you can get tens of shots with complete spatial and element consistency in a single generation. Create a specific AI Agent to help you with storyboarding, and feed the input into Seedance to get the most cinematic shots. You can access Seedance 2.0 now on insMind (link at the end of the thread). Workflow + Prompts👇

VoxelPlot

125,934 次观看 • 3 个月前

I tested Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3.0. The winner was obvious. Same prompt, same reference image, one scene: a boy rescuing his dog from an oncoming car. Seedance 2.0 came out ahead across the board: · Better character consistency — the boy's face and expression stayed recognizable through fast, dynamic motion. · More coherent physics — when the boy dives to save the dog, he actually lands on the other side of the road. In Kling 3.0, they just drop in place, which breaks the logic of the scene. · More natural motion — fluid movements without the exaggerated, theatrical quality that plagues most AI video. · Richer cinematic language — varied shot compositions including close-ups, camera transitions, and framing shifts that actively reinforce emotion and narrative tension. The gap suggests Seedance 2.0's training leans heavier into film language, not just motion synthesis.

I tested Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3.0. The winner was obvious. Same prompt, same reference image, one scene: a boy rescuing his dog from an oncoming car. Seedance 2.0 came out ahead across the board: · Better character consistency — the boy's face and expression stayed recognizable through fast, dynamic motion. · More coherent physics — when the boy dives to save the dog, he actually lands on the other side of the road. In Kling 3.0, they just drop in place, which breaks the logic of the scene. · More natural motion — fluid movements without the exaggerated, theatrical quality that plagues most AI video. · Richer cinematic language — varied shot compositions including close-ups, camera transitions, and framing shifts that actively reinforce emotion and narrative tension. The gap suggests Seedance 2.0's training leans heavier into film language, not just motion synthesis.

Latte

167,558 次观看 • 5 个月前

Dreamina globally debuts Dreamina Seedance 2.5 and we built this 49-second short film with 4 characters that never break. Dreamina is ByteDance's own AI product. Same parent company as TikTok. It's been upgraded specifically to max out Seedance 2.5, which makes it the best and most cost-effective place to run this model. You don't need five other tools. Just 1, here’s why👇

Dreamina globally debuts Dreamina Seedance 2.5 and we built this 49-second short film with 4 characters that never break. Dreamina is ByteDance's own AI product. Same parent company as TikTok. It's been upgraded specifically to max out Seedance 2.5, which makes it the best and most cost-effective place to run this model. You don't need five other tools. Just 1, here’s why👇

The AI Colony

160,306 次观看 • 2 天前