正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Minimax Natural Motion → Solid. All the video tools offer something different. MJ PROMPT: homesteader, epic cinema --ar 5:3 --p MINIMAX PROMPTS: 1. zooming in shot of a man eating arguala from a bowl 2. pulling in shot as a donkey walks towards a young girl and nuzzles her...

77,647 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Brent Lynch 的头像
Brent Lynch1 年前

I'm going to blowout my @X bookmark, like, and repost buttons now that I have come across your account! Incredible. @Hailuo_AI

Rory Flynn 的头像
Rory Flynn1 年前

@X @Hailuo_AI 🤣🤣🤣 thanks man...i'll try to keep them coming

Trisha Code 的头像
Trisha Code1 年前

that thing really knows the soul of a donkey, excellent

Rory Flynn 的头像
Rory Flynn1 年前

💯 that was the most impressive aspect of the entire thing.

Artvisionᴺᶠᵀ 的头像
Artvisionᴺᶠᵀ1 年前

whoaaaa... Rory... you do magic with ai

Rory Flynn 的头像
Rory Flynn1 年前

🙏 much appreciated

Tabi Yume 的头像
Tabi Yume1 年前

all IG have their own flaws and strength however @Hailuo_AI has edge over others with motion fluid realistic movement. But their main stength is how we are able to prompt camera and action in depth. This is I2V full control over output with kick at end too is coomand at prompt😜

Pablo Chaco 的头像
Pablo Chaco1 年前

wild!

padphone 的头像
padphone1 年前

Good case

Michael Aubry — BasedLabs.ai 的头像
Michael Aubry — BasedLabs.ai1 年前

We should make content like this @AndyAI_ showcasing basedlabs

相关视频

So Runway Gen 4.5 finally adds image-to-video, the workflow most pros rely on for consistency. We put it head to head with Kling AI and Flow by Google VEO using the same reference images and prompts (below) to evaluate motion quality, stability, and cinematic realism. 1. Action/WaterPhysics Test Prompt: Cinematic, wide-shot of a man running in a shallow river. The camera is tracking the man from behind as he runs up the river. Handheld camera shake as the camera follows the man. 2. Fire Physics Test Prompt: Cinematic, wide-shot of terrified woman running towards her burning barn. She abruptly stops, and puts in hands on her head as she watches her barn burn down. 3. VFX test prompt: Cinematic, wide-shot of a hooded figure. Flashes of purple magic and smoke whirl around the figure. The figure lifts its arms as the purple magic and smoke intensifies. 4. 2D Animation Test Prompt: 2D animated shot of a waiting at a bus stop in a thunderstorm. The man turns, walks to the bench, and sits down. 5. 3D Animation Test Prompt: 3D animated shot of an octopus. The octopus reaches into a coral and picks up a glowing white gem. 6. Conversation Test Prompt: slow camera push-in as two friends are having a conversation at a coffee shop Overall verdict: Despite the “world’s best” claim, Runway Gen 4.5 is not there yet. Prompt adherence is solid, but motion, physics, and cinematic realism still lag behind tools like Kling and VEO. Great platform, mid-tier model for now.

Curious Refuge

25,538 次观看 • 5 个月前

With the release of Kling AI 2.6, I was eager to put it up against one of its arch-rivals….Google Flow Veo 3.1. I ran four separate tests. First, I tested their ability to generate consistent and stable action shots. Second, I tested camera movement in a crowded scene. Third, I tested their ability to generate consistent facial details and emotion. Fourth, I wanted to see how well they can generated an interaction between two characters. Prompt 1: camera tracking shot, wide-shot. The camera tracks above as two nights ride on horses through a forest. The horses a galloping fast. The camera is tracking the knights from above. Prompt 2: Slow camera push in on a man eating Ramen at a Ramen house in Japan. The alley street is busy with people. Prompt 3: Close-up shot of a man on a sailboat. The man has a scared look on his face. After a short pause, the man says, "I'm gonna need a bigger boat” Prompt 4: Static camera. A man picks up a cookie from a plate and takes a bite. His dog looks up at him; eagerly wanting a bite of the cookie. The man turns, looks at the dog, and says, "no cookies for you mister” Verdict🏆: To be honest, I was surprised by Kling 2.6. While Veo 3.1 outperformed Kling 2.6 in the close-up shot test, it slightly underperformed in every other test. In the Veo 3.1 outputs, objects would randomly appear and camera movements were abrupt or didn’t adhere to the prompt. Don’t get me wrong, Kling 2.6 definitely had its flaws (its audio was quieter and often mismatched the prompt). That said, I was impressed with Kling 2.6 more than I imagined I would be. Although a somewhat small lead, I would give Kling 2.6 the slight advantage for this round of tests.

Curious Refuge

24,695 次观看 • 7 个月前