正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Minister for Communication, Digital Technology and Innovation, Samuel Nartey George, has proposed a policy requiring individuals to present a National ID card or driver’s licence before accessing pornographic websites, as part of efforts to protect minors online. Speaking at the 4th Inter-Parliamentary Conference on Family, Values and Sovereignty, he...

529,125 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Krishnan Guru-Murthy mocking Labour's Lisa Nandy for running away from Twitter "If only there was a government minister whose job it was to do something about Twitter/X" Sorry Rupa Huq MP agree with you on a lot of things, but on this, Nandy isn't taking a stand, she's running away like a coward when it's her remit to actually do something about it A point of clarification: Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT), headed by the science and technology secretary, focuses on areas such as AI, digital infrastructure, data policy, telecoms and innovation Lisa Nandy, as Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, is responsible for policy relating to online safety, media and the digital environment, including oversight of the implementation of the Online Safety Act 2023 through her department So while DSIT has responsibilities for the UK's wider digital and technology agenda, the regulation of social media platforms and online safety sits primarily with DCMS, making it part of Lisa Nandy's ministerial portfolio And that's why she's both incompetent for not addressing this in the two years she's been in the job, and then a coward for running away And the idea that politics on Facebook and Instagram isn't toxic - she'll be in for a shock! - It's just as bad, though on a smaller scale The whole point of government is to make everyone safe in the country, in person and online. two years into a Labour gov, where's the plan?

Farrukh

59,271 次观看 • 1 个月前

Yesterday, I spoke in the Westminster Hall debate on #DigitalID and I made my position clear: we must protect freedom, privacy, and public trust. Digital ID fails on all three. I strongly oppose this Labour Government’s planned mandatory digital identification scheme. In my view, it is a distraction from recent scandals and from the Labour Government’s continued failure to properly address illegal immigration. A digital ID card cuts across our English Common Law rights, the very foundations of our freedoms. And let’s be clear: a mandatory digital ID will not stop Channel crossings only a proper and effective deterrent will. Linking migration policy to digital ID also risks fuelling conspiracy theories, deepening public distrust, and distracting from real enforcement. France and Italy already have similar systems yet both still face major migration challenges. Successive governments have rejected ID cards for good reason. Keir Starmer made no mention of digital ID in his manifesto before the General Election, avoiding full public scrutiny of what is an intrusive and far-reaching proposal. A government-issued mandatory digital identity is not necessary for delivering online public services, verifying benefits or employment, or confirming immigration status. Government already holds this information, with existing safeguards in place. Introducing a compulsory digital ID would bring major security risks, a shift of power away from individuals, and huge costs to the taxpayer all for no clear benefit.

Iain Duncan Smith MP Chingford & Woodford Green

11,936 次观看 • 7 个月前

NetChoice’s Digital Safety Shield for America 2025: Protect Families, Preserve Online Freedom Families want support to protect their kids online. Today, we launched NetChoice’s Digital Safety Shield for America, offering various policy solutions to federal and state lawmakers that want to adopt meaningful and lawful solutions for families online, covered exclusively by Ben Brody at Punchbowl News. THE PROBLEM: While parents and guardians try to adapt their families to emerging digital tools, they’ve consistently expressed to both technology services and lawmakers that they’d like help. However, some policymakers across the U.S. have responded with laws that violate the core, protected right of Americans to free expression. NetChoice has successfully halted most of these laws. OUR SOLUTION: NetChoice’s Digital Safety Shield for America provides a policy plan for lawmakers on both the state and federal level. Working together, we can stop digital criminals, protect kids and empower parents online while upholding the rights of Americans. Over the next year, we will be releasing various tools and guides for parents and policymakers to empower them to protect families and preserve core freedoms in digital spaces. “Families deserve real solutions that truly protect kids. That’s why NetChoice created the Digital Safety Shield for America—to give lawmakers constitutional tools that stop predators, empower parents and safeguard children online. Instead of unconstitutional, quick political fixes, this framework funds law enforcement, strengthens legal protections and equips parents and kids with the resources they need to thrive in the digital age,” said Amy Bos, NetChoice Director of State & Federal Affairs. Bos continued: “Americans and our families should be able to embrace digital tools with confidence while knowing our rights will be upheld in online spaces. NetChoice’s Digital Safety Shield helps lawmakers strike that appropriate balance.”

NetChoice

48,162 次观看 • 11 个月前