Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Miracles(Dennis Edward Aboagye) is a fact-based communicator. Before disputing his claims, be prepared with evidence. On Joynews TV yesterday, Miracles stated that the NPP has successfully implemented 80% of its 2020 manifesto, based on the party’s analysis. The journalist, unprepared and relying on speculation, tried to dispute Dennis' claims....

MrIrish3's profile picture

Mr Irish

8,464 subscribers

70,764 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Emmylou Harris, Dolly Parton, and Linda Ronstadt appeared on Late Show to perform Neil Young's 'After the Gold Rush.' The Glass Harmonica was played by Dennis James, who remembers the performance in an interview with Rich Bailey in 2002: Rich Bailey says the following: "I remember when you appeared with her on Letterman and you discussed the Armonica a bit. How was that?" Dennis James responds: "Well, it was a great surprise. A sort of unspoken message in the air to me before the broadcast was "Do not say anything on the air!”. After all, these things are Linda's appearances. When David L. leaned over his desk and directed a question to me I simply froze- on playback of the dub I can see myself caught and unable to speak. I received a glance from Linda that said to me it was OK and so when he tried again I called back a flip one liner and on things went from there."
4:08

Emmylou Harris, Dolly Parton, and Linda Ronstadt appeared on Late Show to perform Neil Young's 'After the Gold Rush.' The Glass Harmonica was played by Dennis James, who remembers the performance in an interview with Rich Bailey in 2002: Rich Bailey says the following: "I remember when you appeared with her on Letterman and you discussed the Armonica a bit. How was that?" Dennis James responds: "Well, it was a great surprise. A sort of unspoken message in the air to me before the broadcast was "Do not say anything on the air!”. After all, these things are Linda's appearances. When David L. leaned over his desk and directed a question to me I simply froze- on playback of the dub I can see myself caught and unable to speak. I received a glance from Linda that said to me it was OK and so when he tried again I called back a flip one liner and on things went from there."

Rock'n Roll of All

84,883 views • 1 year ago

Friday, Ian Carroll said: “American politics is not gonna be the same after this weekend.” The weekend is now over, nothing happened, Ian has not produced even a shred of evidence to support his claims, and he walked back his baseless speculation and clickbait hype. Charlatan. After walking back all the histrionics in Friday, Ian now has significantly changed his tune, and claims people are throwing mud at Kennedy’s campaign without evidence. But he fails to mention the part that he and Candace Owens are the only ones slinging mud! THEY started this, with their clickbait theories based on absolutely nothing. Ian is a hack and needs to be called out. He is no ally of MAGA/MAHA. Time to take out the trash.
1:08

Friday, Ian Carroll said: “American politics is not gonna be the same after this weekend.” The weekend is now over, nothing happened, Ian has not produced even a shred of evidence to support his claims, and he walked back his baseless speculation and clickbait hype. Charlatan. After walking back all the histrionics in Friday, Ian now has significantly changed his tune, and claims people are throwing mud at Kennedy’s campaign without evidence. But he fails to mention the part that he and Candace Owens are the only ones slinging mud! THEY started this, with their clickbait theories based on absolutely nothing. Ian is a hack and needs to be called out. He is no ally of MAGA/MAHA. Time to take out the trash.

Clandestine

439,040 views • 1 year ago

David Lynch on using Roy Orbison's "In Dreams" in Blue Velvet (1986), and Roy Orbison's reaction to the film: Chris Rodley: "I’ve always assumed that ‘In Dreams’ was conceived as an integral part of the movie from the beginning. It seems conceptually essential to the story’s intentions and mood. Is that true?" Lynch: "‘In Dreams’ came about while we were in production for Blue Velvet. Kyle MacLachlan and I were on our way down to Wilmington, North Carolina, from New York City. We were going through Central Park on our way to the airport when over the cab’s radio came ‘Crying’ by Roy Orbison, and I’m listening to this song and I said, ‘That! I’ve got to get that for Blue Velvet. When I got to Wilmington I sent somebody out to get Roy Orbison’s greatest hits. I played ‘Crying’ and then I played ‘In Dreams’, and as soon as I did, I forgot ‘Crying’. ‘In Dreams’ explained to me so much of what the film was all about. I immediately called Dennis Hopper and told him about the scene I had in mind and that he had to memorize this song. Dennis and Dean Stockwell are old friends. Dean got together with Dennis to help him work out the song and memorize the lyrics. I wonder why! [Laughs.] So we finally got to the day we were going to shoot the scene in Ben’s apartment where Dennis was going to sing the song. We were rehearsing and Dean said, ‘I’ll stand here and kind of help Dennis if he needs it.’ So we started playing the music and both Dennis and Dean began to sing ‘In Dreams’. All of a sudden Dennis stops singing and looks at Dean — who’s continuing to sing. Dennis is solidly in character and he is moved by Dean’s (Ben’s) singing. There was the scene in front of me. It was so perfect. Once it was decided Dean would be singing ‘In Dreams’, another strange thing happened. I was going to use a small candle-style table lamp as the microphone. Dean knew the microphone was going to be a lamp of some sort and when he went over to the area of Ben’s apartment where we were going to set the song, thinking he saw the prop light, he picked up a work light that was hanging on a nail on the wall. He turned it on and flipped the long cord like a microphone cord and obviously it couldn’t have been more perfect. The strange thing is no one on the crew put that work light there. No one knew where it came from. Who can say how it happens?" Rodley: "The use of ‘In Dreams’ in that scene revived Roy Orbison’s career, but what did he think of the movie and the use of his music in it?" Lynch: "When Roy first saw the movie he didn’t like it. His song ‘In Dreams’ meant another whole thing to him, and it was, like, a precious thing. I think some people he respected must have gotten him to see the movie again and reconsider his feelings. Roy told me that when he saw the movie the second time, he got past what the song was for him and then could appreciate the fact that it was working in another way." — "Lynch on Lynch" (1997), edited by Chris Rodley
0:29

David Lynch on using Roy Orbison's "In Dreams" in Blue Velvet (1986), and Roy Orbison's reaction to the film: Chris Rodley: "I’ve always assumed that ‘In Dreams’ was conceived as an integral part of the movie from the beginning. It seems conceptually essential to the story’s intentions and mood. Is that true?" Lynch: "‘In Dreams’ came about while we were in production for Blue Velvet. Kyle MacLachlan and I were on our way down to Wilmington, North Carolina, from New York City. We were going through Central Park on our way to the airport when over the cab’s radio came ‘Crying’ by Roy Orbison, and I’m listening to this song and I said, ‘That! I’ve got to get that for Blue Velvet. When I got to Wilmington I sent somebody out to get Roy Orbison’s greatest hits. I played ‘Crying’ and then I played ‘In Dreams’, and as soon as I did, I forgot ‘Crying’. ‘In Dreams’ explained to me so much of what the film was all about. I immediately called Dennis Hopper and told him about the scene I had in mind and that he had to memorize this song. Dennis and Dean Stockwell are old friends. Dean got together with Dennis to help him work out the song and memorize the lyrics. I wonder why! [Laughs.] So we finally got to the day we were going to shoot the scene in Ben’s apartment where Dennis was going to sing the song. We were rehearsing and Dean said, ‘I’ll stand here and kind of help Dennis if he needs it.’ So we started playing the music and both Dennis and Dean began to sing ‘In Dreams’. All of a sudden Dennis stops singing and looks at Dean — who’s continuing to sing. Dennis is solidly in character and he is moved by Dean’s (Ben’s) singing. There was the scene in front of me. It was so perfect. Once it was decided Dean would be singing ‘In Dreams’, another strange thing happened. I was going to use a small candle-style table lamp as the microphone. Dean knew the microphone was going to be a lamp of some sort and when he went over to the area of Ben’s apartment where we were going to set the song, thinking he saw the prop light, he picked up a work light that was hanging on a nail on the wall. He turned it on and flipped the long cord like a microphone cord and obviously it couldn’t have been more perfect. The strange thing is no one on the crew put that work light there. No one knew where it came from. Who can say how it happens?" Rodley: "The use of ‘In Dreams’ in that scene revived Roy Orbison’s career, but what did he think of the movie and the use of his music in it?" Lynch: "When Roy first saw the movie he didn’t like it. His song ‘In Dreams’ meant another whole thing to him, and it was, like, a precious thing. I think some people he respected must have gotten him to see the movie again and reconsider his feelings. Roy told me that when he saw the movie the second time, he got past what the song was for him and then could appreciate the fact that it was working in another way." — "Lynch on Lynch" (1997), edited by Chris Rodley

RadiantFilm

96,565 views • 5 months ago

#MMTLP February 2nd, 2024: 479 days ago Dennis Kneale interviewed Rep. Ralph Norman about FINRA's regulatory flup-up, better known as the #MMTLPFiasco. Dennis asks a lot of great questions, like asking the Congressman if he was aware that when shares move into an offshore account, FINRA stops counting them as short, to which Norman replies, "No, I was not." Dennis then mentions question 9 of the open letter, and cites FINRA's claim that they have no authority or data to obtain the information requested (which was a consolidated count of shares held long and short, from all financial institutions, foreign and domestic. While their answer "No" was not quite false it was also not quite true, either. It's a half truth. They DO mention their authority over their member firms but what they fail is to take the initiative and exercise their authority under their own rule 4140 (ironically called "Audit") and have their member firms take steps to get the data. Foreign brokers have American counterparts that have the role of "Custodian" for clearing purposes, so FINRA would have to exercise their authority over the custodian to obtain the data from foreign brokers. There are more steps than getting the data from a domestic broker that is a FINRA member, but it can be done. We live in a digital age where terabytes of information go back and forth every second of every day. The audits could be done in an afternoon. Additionally, Dennis asks Norman that if FINRA and the SEC don't play ball, will Congress subpoena the data to which Norman states that it has to come from a Chairman. "James Comer is the chair of oversight and he signed our letter". "I think we can". Finally, Dennis asks Norman if Congress should hold public hearings on this to which Norman replies, "Absolutely, and we're gonna lead the way on that because at the Financial Services Committee that's our job." July 10th, 2024: 320 days ago and 159 days since the Dennis Kneale interview, Ralph Norman appeared on Dan Ball's show. At this point, we have still not had a hearing or have had subpoenas sent out. We pretty much understood that if we didn't get anywhere by July, we were going to have to wait until the election was over. In this interview, Norman says we've had hearings on it, which isn't really accurate. We were mentioned in two separate hearings by Senator Mike Crapo and Rep Ralph Norman, but to say we have had hearings (pluralized), let alone A hearing on MMTLP is an exaggeration. Norman puts the former CEOs John Brda and George George Palikaras on blast and says "It's in the SEC's hands" but he also says "Were not gonna stop" and "Sooner or later we're gonna get to the bottom of it." I just want Ralph to live up to his word. He has always touted promises made, promises kept in regards to the President living up to his word. Why can't he lead by example, keep his promises to his constituents and those in the #MMTLPARMY that he claims to champion and let's get to the bottom of this once and for all. I want to see subpoenas. I want to see those involved come before the committee, under oath and get grilled. John Brda, George Palikaras, Greg McCabe, for sure. But I also want people like Patricia Casimates, Robert W Cook, Sam Draddy, Yvonne Huber, Jessica Hopper, Chris Stone and any person that was involved in the breaking of FINRA Rule 6490 by changing the language of not just the first corporate action, but the revision two days later. I also want anyone involved with the UPC committee that decided to implement the U3 trading halt. Jeff Mendl, the former VP of OTC markets who went a broadcast and kept saying over and over we will have access up until Monday. He should come before Congress and testify. We are ONE day away from 900 days since the halt. Is this a sick joke, and y'all gonna come to the rescue on day 911? People are sick, people are suffering, and PEOPLE HAVE DIED waiting for some sort of resolution. We're pot committed at this point.
1:44

#MMTLP February 2nd, 2024: 479 days ago Dennis Kneale interviewed Rep. Ralph Norman about FINRA's regulatory flup-up, better known as the #MMTLPFiasco. Dennis asks a lot of great questions, like asking the Congressman if he was aware that when shares move into an offshore account, FINRA stops counting them as short, to which Norman replies, "No, I was not." Dennis then mentions question 9 of the open letter, and cites FINRA's claim that they have no authority or data to obtain the information requested (which was a consolidated count of shares held long and short, from all financial institutions, foreign and domestic. While their answer "No" was not quite false it was also not quite true, either. It's a half truth. They DO mention their authority over their member firms but what they fail is to take the initiative and exercise their authority under their own rule 4140 (ironically called "Audit") and have their member firms take steps to get the data. Foreign brokers have American counterparts that have the role of "Custodian" for clearing purposes, so FINRA would have to exercise their authority over the custodian to obtain the data from foreign brokers. There are more steps than getting the data from a domestic broker that is a FINRA member, but it can be done. We live in a digital age where terabytes of information go back and forth every second of every day. The audits could be done in an afternoon. Additionally, Dennis asks Norman that if FINRA and the SEC don't play ball, will Congress subpoena the data to which Norman states that it has to come from a Chairman. "James Comer is the chair of oversight and he signed our letter". "I think we can". Finally, Dennis asks Norman if Congress should hold public hearings on this to which Norman replies, "Absolutely, and we're gonna lead the way on that because at the Financial Services Committee that's our job." July 10th, 2024: 320 days ago and 159 days since the Dennis Kneale interview, Ralph Norman appeared on Dan Ball's show. At this point, we have still not had a hearing or have had subpoenas sent out. We pretty much understood that if we didn't get anywhere by July, we were going to have to wait until the election was over. In this interview, Norman says we've had hearings on it, which isn't really accurate. We were mentioned in two separate hearings by Senator Mike Crapo and Rep Ralph Norman, but to say we have had hearings (pluralized), let alone A hearing on MMTLP is an exaggeration. Norman puts the former CEOs John Brda and George George Palikaras on blast and says "It's in the SEC's hands" but he also says "Were not gonna stop" and "Sooner or later we're gonna get to the bottom of it." I just want Ralph to live up to his word. He has always touted promises made, promises kept in regards to the President living up to his word. Why can't he lead by example, keep his promises to his constituents and those in the #MMTLPARMY that he claims to champion and let's get to the bottom of this once and for all. I want to see subpoenas. I want to see those involved come before the committee, under oath and get grilled. John Brda, George Palikaras, Greg McCabe, for sure. But I also want people like Patricia Casimates, Robert W Cook, Sam Draddy, Yvonne Huber, Jessica Hopper, Chris Stone and any person that was involved in the breaking of FINRA Rule 6490 by changing the language of not just the first corporate action, but the revision two days later. I also want anyone involved with the UPC committee that decided to implement the U3 trading halt. Jeff Mendl, the former VP of OTC markets who went a broadcast and kept saying over and over we will have access up until Monday. He should come before Congress and testify. We are ONE day away from 900 days since the halt. Is this a sick joke, and y'all gonna come to the rescue on day 911? People are sick, people are suffering, and PEOPLE HAVE DIED waiting for some sort of resolution. We're pot committed at this point.

MARDÜK the META® Guy

27,674 views • 1 year ago

This is exactly what I wrote yesterday: Putin loves relying on precedents: Putin on comparing the Kosovo precedent with the situation with the so-called "Donetsk People's Republic" and "Luhansk People's Republic": "This region is not required to seek permission from the central authorities. That’s it. You see? They did everything with their own hands. And then they say, "How could you do that?" Well, just like that. So it’s okay when you do it, but not here? That’s not how it’s going to be. The rules must be the same for everyone. Only then will they be stable. And that is the guarantee of security for all — not at someone else’s expense. That’s the key point, the key link."
0:34

This is exactly what I wrote yesterday: Putin loves relying on precedents: Putin on comparing the Kosovo precedent with the situation with the so-called "Donetsk People's Republic" and "Luhansk People's Republic": "This region is not required to seek permission from the central authorities. That’s it. You see? They did everything with their own hands. And then they say, "How could you do that?" Well, just like that. So it’s okay when you do it, but not here? That’s not how it’s going to be. The rules must be the same for everyone. Only then will they be stable. And that is the guarantee of security for all — not at someone else’s expense. That’s the key point, the key link."

Anton Gerashchenko

81,696 views • 1 year ago

JACQUI TIME (Jacqui Heinrich): “Based on your analysis so far, do you have a sense of who is at fault? If it was plane, the helicopter, air traffic control? And can you assure people that it is safe to fly in and out of DC?” Trump: “Well, I've given you the analysis and the analysis was — was based on vision. You got a lot of people that saw what was happening. You had some people that knew what was happening. There were some warnings, but the warnings were given very, very late. You know, those warnings were given very late. It was almost as they were given a few seconds later, was a crash — should have been brought up earlier, but the people and the helicopters should have seen where they were going. I can't imagine people with 20/20 vision not seeing, you know, what's happening up there. Again, they shouldn't have been at the same — if you're going with — in reverse directions or sideways directions, obviously, you want to be at different heights. I see it all the time when I'm flying. I — you have planes going in the opposite. They're always lower or higher or — so if somehow there’s a screw up, there's not going to be a tragedy. It'll be close, but you know, there's never going to be a tragedy if you're in a different elevation. For whatever reason, they were at the same elevation and also from the American Airlines center, he's along the track that every plane is along. You say what was a helicopter doing in that track? Very sad, but visually, somebody should have been able to see and taken that helicopter out of play and they should have been at a different height.”
1:44

JACQUI TIME (Jacqui Heinrich): “Based on your analysis so far, do you have a sense of who is at fault? If it was plane, the helicopter, air traffic control? And can you assure people that it is safe to fly in and out of DC?” Trump: “Well, I've given you the analysis and the analysis was — was based on vision. You got a lot of people that saw what was happening. You had some people that knew what was happening. There were some warnings, but the warnings were given very, very late. You know, those warnings were given very late. It was almost as they were given a few seconds later, was a crash — should have been brought up earlier, but the people and the helicopters should have seen where they were going. I can't imagine people with 20/20 vision not seeing, you know, what's happening up there. Again, they shouldn't have been at the same — if you're going with — in reverse directions or sideways directions, obviously, you want to be at different heights. I see it all the time when I'm flying. I — you have planes going in the opposite. They're always lower or higher or — so if somehow there’s a screw up, there's not going to be a tragedy. It'll be close, but you know, there's never going to be a tragedy if you're in a different elevation. For whatever reason, they were at the same elevation and also from the American Airlines center, he's along the track that every plane is along. You say what was a helicopter doing in that track? Very sad, but visually, somebody should have been able to see and taken that helicopter out of play and they should have been at a different height.”

Curtis Houck

11,692 views • 1 year ago

Erbil-based Shams TV explains why they held off on airing their exclusive interview with Syrian President أحمد الشرع: The journalist explains that the pre-interview understanding from the channel was for the segment to serve as a way to calm the waters with regards to the Damascus-Kurdish conflict in Syria. He said the general vibe in Erbil is against the interview, and the Syrian president was savvy in his answers and emphasized he had no quarrel with the Kurdish people. Yet, the journalist says he was surprised that the president started off taking a hard line against the SDF. He says he tried to nudge him through questions toward a conciliatory tone, but he kept escalating. 'He had enough of General Mazloum and the SDF, and he would not give them another chance, only to adhere to the March agreement.' It was a final warning. He said he'd never accept to have a militia in the country, insisting on only one country and one army. The journalist said the interview was supposed to be 30 minutes but ran to 53. Afterwards, he said, he checked with his colleagues, and the consensus was that the interview would inflame things rather than calm the waters, so they decided to hold it until further notice.
4:01

Erbil-based Shams TV explains why they held off on airing their exclusive interview with Syrian President أحمد الشرع: The journalist explains that the pre-interview understanding from the channel was for the segment to serve as a way to calm the waters with regards to the Damascus-Kurdish conflict in Syria. He said the general vibe in Erbil is against the interview, and the Syrian president was savvy in his answers and emphasized he had no quarrel with the Kurdish people. Yet, the journalist says he was surprised that the president started off taking a hard line against the SDF. He says he tried to nudge him through questions toward a conciliatory tone, but he kept escalating. 'He had enough of General Mazloum and the SDF, and he would not give them another chance, only to adhere to the March agreement.' It was a final warning. He said he'd never accept to have a militia in the country, insisting on only one country and one army. The journalist said the interview was supposed to be 30 minutes but ran to 53. Afterwards, he said, he checked with his colleagues, and the consensus was that the interview would inflame things rather than calm the waters, so they decided to hold it until further notice.

Hassan I. Hassan

76,245 views • 6 months ago

Since yesterday, people keep asking me the same question: How can someone be hanged for opening a door? I want you to see the answer with your own eyes. Two Iranian protesters. Both killed in front of cameras for showing compassion. One opened a door when protesters came running security forces right behind them, armed. He let them in. Then he pushed against that same door with everything he had, trying to keep the security forces out. They forced it open. And they killed him right there. The other had a wounded protester on his shoulder, carrying him through the streets to safety. That was enough. Empty hands. No weapons. Just human beings doing what human beings do, protecting each other. The Islamic Republic calls this a crime worthy of death. That is the Iran the world needs to see. The Islamic republic is terrorist not the people of Iran. #StopExecutionInIran 💔
1:00

Since yesterday, people keep asking me the same question: How can someone be hanged for opening a door? I want you to see the answer with your own eyes. Two Iranian protesters. Both killed in front of cameras for showing compassion. One opened a door when protesters came running security forces right behind them, armed. He let them in. Then he pushed against that same door with everything he had, trying to keep the security forces out. They forced it open. And they killed him right there. The other had a wounded protester on his shoulder, carrying him through the streets to safety. That was enough. Empty hands. No weapons. Just human beings doing what human beings do, protecting each other. The Islamic Republic calls this a crime worthy of death. That is the Iran the world needs to see. The Islamic republic is terrorist not the people of Iran. #StopExecutionInIran 💔

Masih Alinejad

434,132 views • 9 days ago

Putin on LGBT: We've never banned gay people. All people should live equal. We talked about banning LGBT propaganda among minors.. Adults have the right to live as they choose. However, when it comes to young people who are still developing, there should be no aggressive influence on their consciousness until they feel mature. He clarified that the discussion was only about banning propaganda directed at minors—not about banning non-traditional relationships themselves. Russia’s policy has always been based on the principle that all people should be equal. Putin stated that his position is not driven by personal protest or a desire to argue, but by a conviction that without relying on traditional values, Russia risks losing its identity. He considers this loss of identity extremely dangerous for the country’s future.
4:57

Putin on LGBT: We've never banned gay people. All people should live equal. We talked about banning LGBT propaganda among minors.. Adults have the right to live as they choose. However, when it comes to young people who are still developing, there should be no aggressive influence on their consciousness until they feel mature. He clarified that the discussion was only about banning propaganda directed at minors—not about banning non-traditional relationships themselves. Russia’s policy has always been based on the principle that all people should be equal. Putin stated that his position is not driven by personal protest or a desire to argue, but by a conviction that without relying on traditional values, Russia risks losing its identity. He considers this loss of identity extremely dangerous for the country’s future.

Russian Market

19,011 views • 1 year ago

Talarico: When I get tough questions, I answer them. When Ken Paxton gets tough questions, he runs away, literally runs away from reporters, from voters, from anyone asking hard questions. If you've given an Epstein style sweetheart deal to an admitted child predator, you should have to answer the public's questions. If you were reported to the FBI for bribery by your own staff, you should have to answer the public's questions. If you've become a multi-millionaire on a government salary and now own 15 homes on the public's dime, then you should have to answer the public's questions. I get it, if I had Ken Paxton's record of corruption, I wouldn't want to answer these questions either. But he's asking for your vote. He is asking for your trust. And the people of Texas deserve answers. So I've challenged Ken Paxton to these three televised debates. The networks have already set the dates and the times and the locations. We're just waiting on Ken Paxton. I'm not afraid of tough questions. We'll see if Ken Paxton can say the same.
2:21

Talarico: When I get tough questions, I answer them. When Ken Paxton gets tough questions, he runs away, literally runs away from reporters, from voters, from anyone asking hard questions. If you've given an Epstein style sweetheart deal to an admitted child predator, you should have to answer the public's questions. If you were reported to the FBI for bribery by your own staff, you should have to answer the public's questions. If you've become a multi-millionaire on a government salary and now own 15 homes on the public's dime, then you should have to answer the public's questions. I get it, if I had Ken Paxton's record of corruption, I wouldn't want to answer these questions either. But he's asking for your vote. He is asking for your trust. And the people of Texas deserve answers. So I've challenged Ken Paxton to these three televised debates. The networks have already set the dates and the times and the locations. We're just waiting on Ken Paxton. I'm not afraid of tough questions. We'll see if Ken Paxton can say the same.

Acyn

22,698 views • 10 hours ago

🔥 “THIS WAS JUST A FRIENDLY REMINDER THAT WE ARE A COUNTRY OF LAWS” - Sen. Mark Kelly Kelly then lies and says “PRESIDENT TRUMP HAS FIRED PEOPLE BECAUSE THEY ARE WOMEN OR THE COLOR OF THEIR SKIN” Do you see what they are doing? They are trying to ACTIVATE PEOPLE with rhetoric like the left tried TO ACTIVATED AND DID trans attackers as their tin soldiers of chaos. Its was an attempt to INSERT THEMSELVES & DOUBT IN THE CHAIN IF COMMAND. He then plays victim and has the audacity to bring up Charlie Kirk, Butler & and the attack on his wife. The primary party we are seeing violence from is the LEFT. He then lets Walt Isaacson pretend he had an EPIPHANY that maybe THIS IS PART OF A GRANDER PLAN BY THE PRESIDENT..like idk….dictatorship. Kelly says “WELL YOU MIGHT BE ON TO SOMETHING”. These people are intentionally doing this and now pretending they are the victims but didn’t have a word to say regarding this when Obama or Biden were President & MSDNC is deep state TV.
6:51

🔥 “THIS WAS JUST A FRIENDLY REMINDER THAT WE ARE A COUNTRY OF LAWS” - Sen. Mark Kelly Kelly then lies and says “PRESIDENT TRUMP HAS FIRED PEOPLE BECAUSE THEY ARE WOMEN OR THE COLOR OF THEIR SKIN” Do you see what they are doing? They are trying to ACTIVATE PEOPLE with rhetoric like the left tried TO ACTIVATED AND DID trans attackers as their tin soldiers of chaos. Its was an attempt to INSERT THEMSELVES & DOUBT IN THE CHAIN IF COMMAND. He then plays victim and has the audacity to bring up Charlie Kirk, Butler & and the attack on his wife. The primary party we are seeing violence from is the LEFT. He then lets Walt Isaacson pretend he had an EPIPHANY that maybe THIS IS PART OF A GRANDER PLAN BY THE PRESIDENT..like idk….dictatorship. Kelly says “WELL YOU MIGHT BE ON TO SOMETHING”. These people are intentionally doing this and now pretending they are the victims but didn’t have a word to say regarding this when Obama or Biden were President & MSDNC is deep state TV.

Johnny St.Pete

50,660 views • 8 months ago

This umpire confronted some parents that just wouldn’t stop. He told them to be quiet or he was going to make their team forfeit. They kept on going so….. he called “ballgame!” The heckling parents asked him if he felt better and he said “I feel fine, you feel okay?….the game is for your kid……you wanna argue balls and strikes in a little league game? Come on!” Then one of the parents says “and this guy’s a firefighter who protects your neighborhood!” 😳 Some people feel that maybe that guy’s Captain at the Fire Station needs to know how he’s acting out in public. Others said he should be banned all season. 💯 I can’t stand parents who act like that. I bet those kids were upset they didn’t get to play. The coach of that team should have intervened and got rid of that parent. Now his players paid the price for some “adult” who couldn’t keep his mouth shut. What would you do? Would you call his work and tell them what he did and how he’s acting? Should he be banned from the park for the rest of the season? How do you think his own kid felt?
0:25

This umpire confronted some parents that just wouldn’t stop. He told them to be quiet or he was going to make their team forfeit. They kept on going so….. he called “ballgame!” The heckling parents asked him if he felt better and he said “I feel fine, you feel okay?….the game is for your kid……you wanna argue balls and strikes in a little league game? Come on!” Then one of the parents says “and this guy’s a firefighter who protects your neighborhood!” 😳 Some people feel that maybe that guy’s Captain at the Fire Station needs to know how he’s acting out in public. Others said he should be banned all season. 💯 I can’t stand parents who act like that. I bet those kids were upset they didn’t get to play. The coach of that team should have intervened and got rid of that parent. Now his players paid the price for some “adult” who couldn’t keep his mouth shut. What would you do? Would you call his work and tell them what he did and how he’s acting? Should he be banned from the park for the rest of the season? How do you think his own kid felt?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

2,257,674 views • 2 months ago

Trump confirmed to be secretly helping takedown Jeffery Epstein and his child trafficking network since the early 2000s. One of the Epstein victim's lawyers, Bradley Edwards, stated that Trump has been helping take down Epstein since the early 2000s and is the ONLY one to help prosecutors in convicting Epstein. Every single other person refused to help and depositions were taken out on these select individuals. Take a wild guess as to why? An older video from the early 2000s confirms exactly what the same lawyer stated about Trump helping takedown Epstein and being the only one. Epstein's own pilot also confirmed that Trump was never on the Lolita Express and never went to the island or was on any of his jets besides with Epstein himself and his brother or with his own family. There is also conformation that Trump threw Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago after Epstein hit on a members young daughter. Trump found out and immediately kicked Epstein out and banned him from the club for life. Every single victim of Epstein and others also were asked live on air about Trump and his involvement and they all also said "NO" that he wasn't involved. Virginia Giuffre's testimony also confirmed that Trump was never seen or involved in anything nefarious or with any other women. Epstein's own lawyer confirmed that he personally asked if Epstein had any dirt on Trump and he specifically said "NO." Julian Assange, when Wikileaks was taking off, specifically looked and asked for dirt on Trump from numerous people. He then was asked on live T.V. about it and said that he didn't have any dirt on Trump because there isn't any. Sammy the Bull, the notorious mobster also claimed that the mob approached Donald Trump numerous times and tried to buy him and blackmail him but it didn't work because he was a solid man and couldn't be bought. These are just some examples of endless amounts of poof to confirm to the population that President Donald J. Trump is not involved in the Epstein case in any nefarious way, shape, or form. You won't find any dirt on Trump because there isn't any. For the ones who are guilty, justice must be served.
3:59

Trump confirmed to be secretly helping takedown Jeffery Epstein and his child trafficking network since the early 2000s. One of the Epstein victim's lawyers, Bradley Edwards, stated that Trump has been helping take down Epstein since the early 2000s and is the ONLY one to help prosecutors in convicting Epstein. Every single other person refused to help and depositions were taken out on these select individuals. Take a wild guess as to why? An older video from the early 2000s confirms exactly what the same lawyer stated about Trump helping takedown Epstein and being the only one. Epstein's own pilot also confirmed that Trump was never on the Lolita Express and never went to the island or was on any of his jets besides with Epstein himself and his brother or with his own family. There is also conformation that Trump threw Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago after Epstein hit on a members young daughter. Trump found out and immediately kicked Epstein out and banned him from the club for life. Every single victim of Epstein and others also were asked live on air about Trump and his involvement and they all also said "NO" that he wasn't involved. Virginia Giuffre's testimony also confirmed that Trump was never seen or involved in anything nefarious or with any other women. Epstein's own lawyer confirmed that he personally asked if Epstein had any dirt on Trump and he specifically said "NO." Julian Assange, when Wikileaks was taking off, specifically looked and asked for dirt on Trump from numerous people. He then was asked on live T.V. about it and said that he didn't have any dirt on Trump because there isn't any. Sammy the Bull, the notorious mobster also claimed that the mob approached Donald Trump numerous times and tried to buy him and blackmail him but it didn't work because he was a solid man and couldn't be bought. These are just some examples of endless amounts of poof to confirm to the population that President Donald J. Trump is not involved in the Epstein case in any nefarious way, shape, or form. You won't find any dirt on Trump because there isn't any. For the ones who are guilty, justice must be served.

The SCIF

291,706 views • 10 months ago

Former DP Rigathi Gachagua: The President should make up his mind on how much money I was supposedly asking for. His 'chief propagandist', Dennis Itumbi, wrote that I asked for KSh 6.5 billion. His 'Mr. Fix-It', Kimani Ichung’wah, claimed it was KSh 8 billion. Then Ruto himself said I asked for KSh 10 billion. Can they sit down and agree on a figure Rigathi Gachagua is supposed to have asked for? But it’s all just a narrative he wanted to push in the Mountain. If it were true, it would have come up during the impeachment. Earlier, the President called me and said he couldn’t work with me anymore. He offered me KSh 2 billion, but I refused. He told me, 'Instead of going home empty-handed, I want you to at least leave with your retirement package — I can get you something to start off with, like KSh 1.5 to 2 billion, i told him i was not interested
2:20

Former DP Rigathi Gachagua: The President should make up his mind on how much money I was supposedly asking for. His 'chief propagandist', Dennis Itumbi, wrote that I asked for KSh 6.5 billion. His 'Mr. Fix-It', Kimani Ichung’wah, claimed it was KSh 8 billion. Then Ruto himself said I asked for KSh 10 billion. Can they sit down and agree on a figure Rigathi Gachagua is supposed to have asked for? But it’s all just a narrative he wanted to push in the Mountain. If it were true, it would have come up during the impeachment. Earlier, the President called me and said he couldn’t work with me anymore. He offered me KSh 2 billion, but I refused. He told me, 'Instead of going home empty-handed, I want you to at least leave with your retirement package — I can get you something to start off with, like KSh 1.5 to 2 billion, i told him i was not interested

KTN News

132,617 views • 1 year ago

Iran News Hon. Mayor Rudy W. Giuliani on Reza Pahlavi: " To me, it's outrageous that he's even presenting himself, and it's even more outrageous that some portion of the international media just ignore it." "...The only reason he has any standing to ask for this position is because of his father. It'd be one thing if he were a man of his own accomplishment. If he had built a great, wonderful business that was helping people, or he saved people, or maybe like some people do, he was guilty for the sins of his father and tried to make compensation for that...." Hear this excellent analysis.
2:26

Iran News Hon. Mayor Rudy W. Giuliani on Reza Pahlavi: " To me, it's outrageous that he's even presenting himself, and it's even more outrageous that some portion of the international media just ignore it." "...The only reason he has any standing to ask for this position is because of his father. It'd be one thing if he were a man of his own accomplishment. If he had built a great, wonderful business that was helping people, or he saved people, or maybe like some people do, he was guilty for the sins of his father and tried to make compensation for that...." Hear this excellent analysis.

Pasha Borjkhani

13,584 views • 3 months ago

Gavin Newsom is called out on Meet the Press for an 'investigation' that seems like 'finger pointing' meant to distract from his own ineptitude: Jacob Soboroff: "You've also called for an independent investigation into the issues around water supply that we've seen. What are the questions that you're hoping to answer?" Gavin Newsom: "The same ones you're asking, Same ones that people, when I'm in the streets, are asking, yelling about what the hell happened, what happened to the water system? Was it, by the way? Was it just overwhelmed that you had so much that was used? This is not about finger pointing." Soboroff: "You say what to people who insist that these independent investigations or calls for them, Are you passing the blame on to other people?" Newsom: "I'm not. How could it be when we're doing an independent investigation and we just want the adjudication of the facts? As I say, it's not about finger pointing. It's about answering the questions you and everybody wants answered." If Gavin wants to complete his investigation, all he has to do is look in a mirror.
3:23

Gavin Newsom is called out on Meet the Press for an 'investigation' that seems like 'finger pointing' meant to distract from his own ineptitude: Jacob Soboroff: "You've also called for an independent investigation into the issues around water supply that we've seen. What are the questions that you're hoping to answer?" Gavin Newsom: "The same ones you're asking, Same ones that people, when I'm in the streets, are asking, yelling about what the hell happened, what happened to the water system? Was it, by the way? Was it just overwhelmed that you had so much that was used? This is not about finger pointing." Soboroff: "You say what to people who insist that these independent investigations or calls for them, Are you passing the blame on to other people?" Newsom: "I'm not. How could it be when we're doing an independent investigation and we just want the adjudication of the facts? As I say, it's not about finger pointing. It's about answering the questions you and everybody wants answered." If Gavin wants to complete his investigation, all he has to do is look in a mirror.

Eric Abbenante

15,013 views • 1 year ago

Yes on the videos we have so far. The initial encounter was him filming them. There was no gun being brandished. They jumped out of vehicles to go to try to intimidate him. Unfortunately there's no video yet between then and when they had them on the ground. When they had him on the ground they were pistol whipping him, at first it looked like a baton, but it's actually a gun. They had him down with at least five officers. You got to wait for a second so he tried to stand up they shot him in the back he was motionless after they shot him in the back. Then there were four more shots or more after that unloaded into his body from a posture of standing above him. Not a defensive posture. He's supposedly has a gun. It looks like ICE took something out of a holster. So it's likely that he did have a HOLSTERED GUN in an open carry state that is not a reason to shoot someone to death. He was not brandishing it -- again it was his camera. That was the reason for the initial approach was to intimidate him about his camera. It is perfectly legal to film ice This is out not murder once again. Now there is some sort of speculation on social that a gun was dropped and a bullet went off. That would be the ICE AGENTS who took the gun out of his holster. I'll post some videos for people to see in the order that they happened.
0:35

Yes on the videos we have so far. The initial encounter was him filming them. There was no gun being brandished. They jumped out of vehicles to go to try to intimidate him. Unfortunately there's no video yet between then and when they had them on the ground. When they had him on the ground they were pistol whipping him, at first it looked like a baton, but it's actually a gun. They had him down with at least five officers. You got to wait for a second so he tried to stand up they shot him in the back he was motionless after they shot him in the back. Then there were four more shots or more after that unloaded into his body from a posture of standing above him. Not a defensive posture. He's supposedly has a gun. It looks like ICE took something out of a holster. So it's likely that he did have a HOLSTERED GUN in an open carry state that is not a reason to shoot someone to death. He was not brandishing it -- again it was his camera. That was the reason for the initial approach was to intimidate him about his camera. It is perfectly legal to film ice This is out not murder once again. Now there is some sort of speculation on social that a gun was dropped and a bullet went off. That would be the ICE AGENTS who took the gun out of his holster. I'll post some videos for people to see in the order that they happened.

Kristine (@schachin on Threads) 🇺🇦

23,566 views • 6 months ago

Channel 4 news, the far left, woke pro migrant news Channel went after Citizen Journalists, doing a hit job on Ay Audits who is one of the popular auditors who covers migrant hotels etc. In this video, they try to make out that he is "far right" because he was handed a leaflet by far right group "white vanguard" one one of his live streams. ay is not far right i did speak to him about that incident a while back and he did tell me that he didnt even know who they were, others mentioned to me that day that they had been told to LEAVE Epping by locals and other auditors. This is something Channel 4 news would have known if they didnt have a political media bias and did some actual investigate journalism themselves. They later mention that auditors break into illegal migrant hotels and film them. They do not "break in" they always leave when they are trespassed as its a civil matter. Now im not 100% sure but I believe ay was arrested after a civil dispute of trespassing, if thats true then police were in the wrong. They then claimed ay is on 10 to 20k a month on YouTube, even i find that hard to believe maybe a few k when there were heavy protests but this statement was made to use as rage bait. Then we get far left "journalist" Cathy Newman mention that they had contacted advertisers to put pressure on them to try and get them to pull their advertising on his YouTube videos and even lied to YouTube who rightfully stated that they found no evidence to their claims hence why she named the advertisers to try and put pressure on them to whine at YouTube.. This is student activism and not journalism they are obviously feeling the impact on viewing figures and their own ad revenue loss as people are listening to the likes of Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 and Ay Audits and having their eyes opened. People are waking up now thanks to them X and Elon Musk and I fully support Citizen Journalists like them and Jack Hadfield 🇬🇧 Emma Dunwell and VoxPopuli etc who are all doing a fantastic job and if some if them make a bit if money so be it they do this as a job and more deserved to being paid for all the real journalism they do!!
12:36

Channel 4 news, the far left, woke pro migrant news Channel went after Citizen Journalists, doing a hit job on Ay Audits who is one of the popular auditors who covers migrant hotels etc. In this video, they try to make out that he is "far right" because he was handed a leaflet by far right group "white vanguard" one one of his live streams. ay is not far right i did speak to him about that incident a while back and he did tell me that he didnt even know who they were, others mentioned to me that day that they had been told to LEAVE Epping by locals and other auditors. This is something Channel 4 news would have known if they didnt have a political media bias and did some actual investigate journalism themselves. They later mention that auditors break into illegal migrant hotels and film them. They do not "break in" they always leave when they are trespassed as its a civil matter. Now im not 100% sure but I believe ay was arrested after a civil dispute of trespassing, if thats true then police were in the wrong. They then claimed ay is on 10 to 20k a month on YouTube, even i find that hard to believe maybe a few k when there were heavy protests but this statement was made to use as rage bait. Then we get far left "journalist" Cathy Newman mention that they had contacted advertisers to put pressure on them to try and get them to pull their advertising on his YouTube videos and even lied to YouTube who rightfully stated that they found no evidence to their claims hence why she named the advertisers to try and put pressure on them to whine at YouTube.. This is student activism and not journalism they are obviously feeling the impact on viewing figures and their own ad revenue loss as people are listening to the likes of Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 and Ay Audits and having their eyes opened. People are waking up now thanks to them X and Elon Musk and I fully support Citizen Journalists like them and Jack Hadfield 🇬🇧 Emma Dunwell and VoxPopuli etc who are all doing a fantastic job and if some if them make a bit if money so be it they do this as a job and more deserved to being paid for all the real journalism they do!!

Grifty

26,296 views • 10 months ago

A man is getting dinner at a Hibachi restaurant with his family. When the chef cooks their food, he reveals he brought his own tortillas to wrap his food. He throws them on the grill to warm them up. I’ve seen people bring Tupperware to a restaurant and eat out of it. I know that can be frowned upon or even considered tacky, but it’s not violating any real health codes. This man took tortillas out of a bag he packed himself with his bare hands. He then cross contaminated the grill with his own food from home. There’s no telling what germs or bacteria is on them. Who knows if he set them on a counter that had fresh chicken or other meats on it. My opinion may be extreme but I don’t feel this should be allowed as he’s now exposing everyone else at that table to possible contamination. Back in high school when I used to work at a pizza place, we had people with half eaten sandwiches from eating their order in the car asking us to microwave their food again and putting it on the counter. I always told them no because they already ate off of it, it wasn’t sanitary and I wasn’t going to take that risk.
1:01

A man is getting dinner at a Hibachi restaurant with his family. When the chef cooks their food, he reveals he brought his own tortillas to wrap his food. He throws them on the grill to warm them up. I’ve seen people bring Tupperware to a restaurant and eat out of it. I know that can be frowned upon or even considered tacky, but it’s not violating any real health codes. This man took tortillas out of a bag he packed himself with his bare hands. He then cross contaminated the grill with his own food from home. There’s no telling what germs or bacteria is on them. Who knows if he set them on a counter that had fresh chicken or other meats on it. My opinion may be extreme but I don’t feel this should be allowed as he’s now exposing everyone else at that table to possible contamination. Back in high school when I used to work at a pizza place, we had people with half eaten sandwiches from eating their order in the car asking us to microwave their food again and putting it on the counter. I always told them no because they already ate off of it, it wasn’t sanitary and I wasn’t going to take that risk.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

124,813 views • 2 months ago