Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

MIT PhD student Alex Zhang on why simple harness abstractions beat models trained around their own harness: "When these abstractions are implemented in a really simple way, basically what you see with Prime Agent is that you can slot in any model. We don't train any model around Prime... show more

MTS

388,825 subscribers

146,258 views • 5 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

MIT PhD student Alex Zhang admits current AI models might already be AGI with the right harness around them: "To an extent, the answer is kind of yes. The strongest thing I can say is that we can do a lot more with the current models that we have." "Whether that means actually automating things, I'm not actually sure, but one of the obvious things that we find with even harnesses outside of Prime Agent is that harnesses can greatly increase the capabilities and generalization of models." "There's a lot of cases where we think models can't be used or they can't be applied for these settings, but the likely answer is that this actually isn't true. You probably can apply a model to the setting if you have the right harness." alex zhang Seth Karten Prime Intellect

MIT PhD student Alex Zhang admits current AI models might already be AGI with the right harness around them: "To an extent, the answer is kind of yes. The strongest thing I can say is that we can do a lot more with the current models that we have." "Whether that means actually automating things, I'm not actually sure, but one of the obvious things that we find with even harnesses outside of Prime Agent is that harnesses can greatly increase the capabilities and generalization of models." "There's a lot of cases where we think models can't be used or they can't be applied for these settings, but the likely answer is that this actually isn't true. You probably can apply a model to the setting if you have the right harness." alex zhang Seth Karten Prime Intellect

MTS

28,118 views • 5 days ago

MIT PhD student Alex Zhang reveals the scaling result where a model trained on short tasks generalizes to problems 100x longer for free: "If you're very clever about the design of your harness or how you use the language model, you can almost get scaling gains for free." "If you train a model naively, there's no tricks. It's just the same way you train a model on these RL environments. You just roll it out, and then you just get some reward." "If you train it on only short tasks, like only tasks that are 10,000 tokens long, and then you were to run it on a similar domain, but at a million tokens, or 10 million tokens, or 100,000 tokens, it generalizes really, really well. If you look at it compared to even the base transformer, you get way better generalization properties." "When the model uses an RLM (Recursive Language Model) after it's trained on these short tasks, it will see some kind of trajectory of actions that it does. Between these two problems of different lengths, the RLM learns to see them as almost the same problem." "Token for token, they're almost the same. You can describe it in code. In one code setting, maybe the for loop is a little bigger, but it's the same kind of code and it derives the constants from the data. There's no hard coding, so they literally look the same." alex zhang

MIT PhD student Alex Zhang reveals the scaling result where a model trained on short tasks generalizes to problems 100x longer for free: "If you're very clever about the design of your harness or how you use the language model, you can almost get scaling gains for free." "If you train a model naively, there's no tricks. It's just the same way you train a model on these RL environments. You just roll it out, and then you just get some reward." "If you train it on only short tasks, like only tasks that are 10,000 tokens long, and then you were to run it on a similar domain, but at a million tokens, or 10 million tokens, or 100,000 tokens, it generalizes really, really well. If you look at it compared to even the base transformer, you get way better generalization properties." "When the model uses an RLM (Recursive Language Model) after it's trained on these short tasks, it will see some kind of trajectory of actions that it does. Between these two problems of different lengths, the RLM learns to see them as almost the same problem." "Token for token, they're almost the same. You can describe it in code. In one code setting, maybe the for loop is a little bigger, but it's the same kind of code and it derives the constants from the data. There's no hard coding, so they literally look the same." alex zhang

MTS

100,519 views • 21 days ago

Today is Day 11 of 12 Days of Agent Two. Agent Two isn't just Claude under the hood - we get asked this a lot. The truth is - while we use all the state of the art models out there, the Agent's real intelligence comes from its harness: a domain-specific layer built from continuous creative research that shapes how every model is actually used - more about this in the video. But this harness is what makes Agent Two frontier intelligence for creative work - at 4x the speed, and half the price.

Today is Day 11 of 12 Days of Agent Two. Agent Two isn't just Claude under the hood - we get asked this a lot. The truth is - while we use all the state of the art models out there, the Agent's real intelligence comes from its harness: a domain-specific layer built from continuous creative research that shapes how every model is actually used - more about this in the video. But this harness is what makes Agent Two frontier intelligence for creative work - at 4x the speed, and half the price.

Invideo

2,229,479 views • 23 hours ago

A lot of people are calling Hermes Agent the end of OpenClaw. BRUH! It's not... Nous Research trains actual models and they built an agent around that expertise. The local model routing is solid, but the part that matters for your business is that your conversations become fine-tuning data. You can train a model on how you actually work. 00:00 The Problem with Local AI Models 00:25 Introduction to Nous Research 01:04 Cross-Platform Agent Capabilities 01:44 Deep Local Model Integration 02:30 Routing Tasks to Different Models 03:06 Conversations as Training Data 03:50 Hermes Agent vs. OpenClaw 04:15 Future Plans and Series Overview

A lot of people are calling Hermes Agent the end of OpenClaw. BRUH! It's not... Nous Research trains actual models and they built an agent around that expertise. The local model routing is solid, but the part that matters for your business is that your conversations become fine-tuning data. You can train a model on how you actually work. 00:00 The Problem with Local AI Models 00:25 Introduction to Nous Research 01:04 Cross-Platform Agent Capabilities 01:44 Deep Local Model Integration 02:30 Routing Tasks to Different Models 03:06 Conversations as Training Data 03:50 Hermes Agent vs. OpenClaw 04:15 Future Plans and Series Overview

Ray Fernando

42,398 views • 4 months ago

this is huge news from Cursor, they've pulled of the impossible and turned their ai-wrapper into a in-destructible moat sam altman literally called it cursor's ai agent harness is available for anyone to build on, which means ai models are now a commodity > 1-time install and now anyone can run cursor's agent locally or via cloud. use any model (e.g. gpt 5.5) but with the added cursor harness that makes it 10X better. > its so good that 3 of cursors biggest competitors are embedding it into their products. > now cursor DOESN'T DEPEND on anthropic or openai. their own model (composer 2) competes directly! yesterday sam altman said the ai model and harness are one and the same and today cursor turned their harness into a self-owned moat fucking masterclass (coming from a former cursor / ai wrapper hater)

this is huge news from Cursor, they've pulled of the impossible and turned their ai-wrapper into a in-destructible moat sam altman literally called it cursor's ai agent harness is available for anyone to build on, which means ai models are now a commodity > 1-time install and now anyone can run cursor's agent locally or via cloud. use any model (e.g. gpt 5.5) but with the added cursor harness that makes it 10X better. > its so good that 3 of cursors biggest competitors are embedding it into their products. > now cursor DOESN'T DEPEND on anthropic or openai. their own model (composer 2) competes directly! yesterday sam altman said the ai model and harness are one and the same and today cursor turned their harness into a self-owned moat fucking masterclass (coming from a former cursor / ai wrapper hater)

Ejaaz

950,091 views • 3 months ago

Anthropic Technical Staff Jess Yan says the harness and the model cannot be pulled apart without giving up performance, though she flags her own bias. "I think I am quite biased but I also think that it is impossible to get the maximum possible performance without tying together the harness and the model." "Now the components of the harness and maybe the thickness of the harness will change over time as models get more and more capable." "However, when we test our models and when we are assessing their performance we always have to test it in conjunction with a harness." "And are we going to test it with all the different harnesses of the world? We're going to select the harnesses that we have built." "And so there is an aspect of the necessity of building models is that you have to be testing them with harnesses, and that sort of keeps them paired together."

Anthropic Technical Staff Jess Yan says the harness and the model cannot be pulled apart without giving up performance, though she flags her own bias. "I think I am quite biased but I also think that it is impossible to get the maximum possible performance without tying together the harness and the model." "Now the components of the harness and maybe the thickness of the harness will change over time as models get more and more capable." "However, when we test our models and when we are assessing their performance we always have to test it in conjunction with a harness." "And are we going to test it with all the different harnesses of the world? We're going to select the harnesses that we have built." "And so there is an aspect of the necessity of building models is that you have to be testing them with harnesses, and that sort of keeps them paired together."

Fireside Alpha

580,541 views • 9 days ago

Small Language Models (SML) are the future of AI. "Small" (SML) instead of "Large" (LLM). These small models are highly specialized models with superhuman abilities on specific tasks. Here are two techniques to build these models: • Spectrum • Model Merging I give you a short introduction in the attached video, but here is a quick summary: Spectrum helps us identify the most relevant layers to solve one specific task. We can ignore everything else and focus on fine-tuning these layers. Using Spectrum, we can fine-tune models in a heartbeat. Model Merging combines multiple models into a unique, much better model than any of the individual input models. You can also combine models specialized in different tasks and get a model with multiple abilities. This is the state of the art of productizing models. It's what Arcee.ai's platform does behind the scenes. Arcee collaborated with me on this post and is sponsoring it. There are three main steps to produce a model for your particular use case: 1. You create a dataset by uploading your data. 2. You train a model. At this step, Arcee uses Spectrum and Model Merging to produce a highly specialized model for your task. 3. You can deploy that model to any environment you want. Three important notes: • Training process is 2x faster and 2x cheaper than regular fine-tuning. • Resultant models are smaller and have higher accuracy. • They create these specialized models from open-source models. Check this site so you can fully appreciate how this works: If you want to fine-tune an open-source model, consider Arcee's platform. This is the state of the art.

Small Language Models (SML) are the future of AI. "Small" (SML) instead of "Large" (LLM). These small models are highly specialized models with superhuman abilities on specific tasks. Here are two techniques to build these models: • Spectrum • Model Merging I give you a short introduction in the attached video, but here is a quick summary: Spectrum helps us identify the most relevant layers to solve one specific task. We can ignore everything else and focus on fine-tuning these layers. Using Spectrum, we can fine-tune models in a heartbeat. Model Merging combines multiple models into a unique, much better model than any of the individual input models. You can also combine models specialized in different tasks and get a model with multiple abilities. This is the state of the art of productizing models. It's what Arcee.ai's platform does behind the scenes. Arcee collaborated with me on this post and is sponsoring it. There are three main steps to produce a model for your particular use case: 1. You create a dataset by uploading your data. 2. You train a model. At this step, Arcee uses Spectrum and Model Merging to produce a highly specialized model for your task. 3. You can deploy that model to any environment you want. Three important notes: • Training process is 2x faster and 2x cheaper than regular fine-tuning. • Resultant models are smaller and have higher accuracy. • They create these specialized models from open-source models. Check this site so you can fully appreciate how this works: If you want to fine-tune an open-source model, consider Arcee's platform. This is the state of the art.

Santiago

164,162 views • 2 years ago

“don’t train your own model” is common ai advice. it's wrong. your token bill's the proof. today, we’re excited to launch castform into open preview. castform is the easiest way for you to train your own model, on your own data. open-weights models are performant and much cheaper. when trained on your task & proprietary data, they beat closed models. the thing standing between you and that was weeks of plumbing & years of ml expertise. with castform, model training is as simple as prompt engineering. castform bring your agent traces or raw corpora. castform turns it into training data, picks the right algorithmic recipes, manages gpus, and gives you an ide to watch and chat with your model as it learns. see what you can build with castform👇

“don’t train your own model” is common ai advice. it's wrong. your token bill's the proof. today, we’re excited to launch castform into open preview. castform is the easiest way for you to train your own model, on your own data. open-weights models are performant and much cheaper. when trained on your task & proprietary data, they beat closed models. the thing standing between you and that was weeks of plumbing & years of ml expertise. with castform, model training is as simple as prompt engineering. castform bring your agent traces or raw corpora. castform turns it into training data, picks the right algorithmic recipes, manages gpus, and gives you an ide to watch and chat with your model as it learns. see what you can build with castform👇

girish

457,932 views • 2 months ago

Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas on the brutal truth about who actually makes money in AI (and why it's not who you think): Aravind argues that the real value in AI comes from orchestration. He points to products like Codex, Claude Code, and Perplexity Computer: "What is that? It's an orchestration system. It takes a model, pairs it with an agent harness." And what is an agent harness? "The simplest way of describing it is like rules for how the agent loop should run. What are all the skills and sub-agents and connectors and tools it accesses? Without the harness, you don't necessarily capture and convert the intrinsic intelligence in the model into valuable output tokens." This leads to a blunt conclusion about who has a real business in AI, and who doesn't: "If you're literally just a reseller of model tokens, you have no business, because the model will get commoditized. So even if you're a model builder, you don't have a business. As an infra layer, you have some business on serving those output tokens. But as an application layer or model builder, you don't really have a business if you're just a reseller of tokens that come directly out of the model." So where does the value accrue? "You have a business if you know how to take the model, ground it in valuable context, orchestrate it with a really good agent harness, connected to the right set of tools and connectors (whether it's personal connectors or business connectors) and provide the experience to people in one single unified system." Aravind Srinivas then explains Perplexity's specific edge: Beyond orchestrating across tools, files, and connectors, they also orchestrate across models. "That is the differentiation that Anthropic and OpenAI cannot claim, because you wouldn't find GPT-5 inside the Claude Code harness. You wouldn't find Claude Opus inside the Codex harness. These are competing with each other. Whereas you would find both these models inside Perplexity Computer." Why does this matter? Because it all comes down to power. In Aravind's framing, the fundamental cost driver in AI is watts (the one input nobody can subsidize except the government). "Whoever provides the most valuable output tokens with the least amount of power expended to produce them generates the greatest value to the end user, has the most pricing power, has the most value. That is the orchestration problem to solve." His conclusion: "The one single most important metric in AI is token value per watt per user."

Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas on the brutal truth about who actually makes money in AI (and why it's not who you think): Aravind argues that the real value in AI comes from orchestration. He points to products like Codex, Claude Code, and Perplexity Computer: "What is that? It's an orchestration system. It takes a model, pairs it with an agent harness." And what is an agent harness? "The simplest way of describing it is like rules for how the agent loop should run. What are all the skills and sub-agents and connectors and tools it accesses? Without the harness, you don't necessarily capture and convert the intrinsic intelligence in the model into valuable output tokens." This leads to a blunt conclusion about who has a real business in AI, and who doesn't: "If you're literally just a reseller of model tokens, you have no business, because the model will get commoditized. So even if you're a model builder, you don't have a business. As an infra layer, you have some business on serving those output tokens. But as an application layer or model builder, you don't really have a business if you're just a reseller of tokens that come directly out of the model." So where does the value accrue? "You have a business if you know how to take the model, ground it in valuable context, orchestrate it with a really good agent harness, connected to the right set of tools and connectors (whether it's personal connectors or business connectors) and provide the experience to people in one single unified system." Aravind Srinivas then explains Perplexity's specific edge: Beyond orchestrating across tools, files, and connectors, they also orchestrate across models. "That is the differentiation that Anthropic and OpenAI cannot claim, because you wouldn't find GPT-5 inside the Claude Code harness. You wouldn't find Claude Opus inside the Codex harness. These are competing with each other. Whereas you would find both these models inside Perplexity Computer." Why does this matter? Because it all comes down to power. In Aravind's framing, the fundamental cost driver in AI is watts (the one input nobody can subsidize except the government). "Whoever provides the most valuable output tokens with the least amount of power expended to produce them generates the greatest value to the end user, has the most pricing power, has the most value. That is the orchestration problem to solve." His conclusion: "The one single most important metric in AI is token value per watt per user."

Big Brain AI

40,092 views • 7 days ago

The founder of LangChain says both models and harnesses have gotten really good between December and now. According to Harrison Chase, the core idea of an agent before Christmas was a model running in a loop and calling tools. This had been the north star for 3 years. - langchain had this when it launched - autogpt was the same idea - openclaw is kind of a future version of it Then about a year ago, they started getting really good. Claude Code, Manus, and Deep Research were all launched around the same time. All of them use the same pattern: running in a loop with harnesses (planning tools, file systems, code execution, etc) Harness engineering became a thing. Then Opus came out in November and really unlocked it. - the harness let the model do more and more - less hardcoded logic - way more control Then everyone went on vacation, played around, and realized that the model and the harness finally worked reliably.

The founder of LangChain says both models and harnesses have gotten really good between December and now. According to Harrison Chase, the core idea of an agent before Christmas was a model running in a loop and calling tools. This had been the north star for 3 years. - langchain had this when it launched - autogpt was the same idea - openclaw is kind of a future version of it Then about a year ago, they started getting really good. Claude Code, Manus, and Deep Research were all launched around the same time. All of them use the same pattern: running in a loop with harnesses (planning tools, file systems, code execution, etc) Harness engineering became a thing. Then Opus came out in November and really unlocked it. - the harness let the model do more and more - less hardcoded logic - way more control Then everyone went on vacation, played around, and realized that the model and the harness finally worked reliably.

Ivan Burazin

33,948 views • 3 months ago

We are releasing 4M-21 with a permissive license, including its source code and trained models. It's a pretty effective multimodal model that solves 10s of tasks & modalities. See the demo code, sample results, and the tokenizers of diverse modalities on the website. IMO, the multitask learning aspect of multimodal models has really taken a step forward. We can train a single model on many diverse tasks with ~SOTA accuracy. But a long way to go in terms of transfer/emergence. 🌐 ⌨️ Joint work w/ EPFL Apple.

We are releasing 4M-21 with a permissive license, including its source code and trained models. It's a pretty effective multimodal model that solves 10s of tasks & modalities. See the demo code, sample results, and the tokenizers of diverse modalities on the website. IMO, the multitask learning aspect of multimodal models has really taken a step forward. We can train a single model on many diverse tasks with ~SOTA accuracy. But a long way to go in terms of transfer/emergence. 🌐 ⌨️ Joint work w/ EPFL Apple.

Amir Zamir

69,564 views • 2 years ago

Finance Agent Benchmark v2 is here. Finance is one of the most lucrative applications of AI where much of the busy work could be automated. That’s why we rebuilt our Finance Agent Benchmark to push frontier models even further. We designed V2 to better reflect what financial analysts actually do: refined taxonomy reflecting real workflows, an improved harness with more tools, and jury-based evaluation. The result: no model cracks 52%. Would you trust a financial analyst who’s only correct half the time?

Finance Agent Benchmark v2 is here. Finance is one of the most lucrative applications of AI where much of the busy work could be automated. That’s why we rebuilt our Finance Agent Benchmark to push frontier models even further. We designed V2 to better reflect what financial analysts actually do: refined taxonomy reflecting real workflows, an improved harness with more tools, and jury-based evaluation. The result: no model cracks 52%. Would you trust a financial analyst who’s only correct half the time?

Vals AI

11,248 views • 3 months ago

EXTREMELY CONCERNING 🚨 PRIME Drinks is going through a lawsuit. “The lawyer who tested their drink is claiming it has 3x the amount of forever chemicals a human can safely have in their lifetime” What exactly is it that the FDA even does in America? “PRIME is now getting sued and you should be seriously concerned if you have any prime since it released. So prime is now going through a new lawsuit after it was discovered that their drink has PFOs which is forever chemicals but what's really concerning is the fact that the lawyer who tested their drink is claiming it has three times the amount of forever chemicals a human can safely have in their lifetime and the lawsuit is claiming they found these forever chemicals in the grape flavored prime drink. However, it also seems like other flavors might also have these chemicals because other prime flavors are being tested. And we're going to find out after the lawsuit is approved. One lawyer on TikTok actually spoke about this and said he had a 10 year old and his mother talked him about how her son got leukemia after drinking prime. Now knowing that prime contains these chemicals, it's very much likely because of it. These chemicals are known to cause cancers and deteriorate your health since they're forever chemicals and your body can't get rid of them. Prime has 3 times the amount of these chemicals a person should have in their lifetime. —So if you still drink Prime or have any make sure you dispose of all of it until we find out what's going on”

EXTREMELY CONCERNING 🚨 PRIME Drinks is going through a lawsuit. “The lawyer who tested their drink is claiming it has 3x the amount of forever chemicals a human can safely have in their lifetime” What exactly is it that the FDA even does in America? “PRIME is now getting sued and you should be seriously concerned if you have any prime since it released. So prime is now going through a new lawsuit after it was discovered that their drink has PFOs which is forever chemicals but what's really concerning is the fact that the lawyer who tested their drink is claiming it has three times the amount of forever chemicals a human can safely have in their lifetime and the lawsuit is claiming they found these forever chemicals in the grape flavored prime drink. However, it also seems like other flavors might also have these chemicals because other prime flavors are being tested. And we're going to find out after the lawsuit is approved. One lawyer on TikTok actually spoke about this and said he had a 10 year old and his mother talked him about how her son got leukemia after drinking prime. Now knowing that prime contains these chemicals, it's very much likely because of it. These chemicals are known to cause cancers and deteriorate your health since they're forever chemicals and your body can't get rid of them. Prime has 3 times the amount of these chemicals a person should have in their lifetime. —So if you still drink Prime or have any make sure you dispose of all of it until we find out what's going on”

Wall Street Apes

9,886,885 views • 2 years ago

AI only has pre-schooler level capabilities for visual tasks. "The frontier models—the best of them—still reason around the age of a preschooler, and any elementary school kid in that benchmark was able to beat all the frontier models on these visual tasks." "These are tasks that are not just object recognition. It's about spatial reasoning... tasks like navigating through the maze…” — Andrew M. Dai, CEO of Elorian

AI only has pre-schooler level capabilities for visual tasks. "The frontier models—the best of them—still reason around the age of a preschooler, and any elementary school kid in that benchmark was able to beat all the frontier models on these visual tasks." "These are tasks that are not just object recognition. It's about spatial reasoning... tasks like navigating through the maze…” — Andrew M. Dai, CEO of Elorian

The Information

25,314 views • 1 month ago

Introducing LobeHub: Agent teammates that grow with you. LobeHub is the ultimate space for work and life: to find, build, and collaborate with agent teammates that grow with you. We’re building the world’s first and largest human–agent co-evolving network. Two years ago, we built LobeChat, an open-source interface for using different AI models. Today, LobeChat has 70k+ GitHub stars and serves 6M+ users worldwide. How to fully unlock the power of models has always been a shared mission between us and the community. We started with interaction — a fundamentally new, agent-first experience. Agents are no longer passive tools invoked in a single conversation. They should be proactive, always-on units of work. Treating agents as the minimal atomic unit is also the core of our agent harness infra. Today’s agents are mostly one-off executors. Even with memory, it’s often global — and hallucinates. We build long-term agent teammates that evolve with users. Each agent has its own dedicated memory space, editable by users, allowing humans and agents to co-evolve over time. This, in turn, allows us to design clearer rewards for reinforcement learning and create cleaner environments for continual learning. Agent teammates can work in groups. Through a multi-agent system, agent groups operate faster, more cost-effective, and go beyond what single-agent systems can achieve. For example, a single agent often requires heavy user involvement to proceed step by step, whereas LobeHub can execute the same work from a single instruction, with a supervisor orchestrating agents that run in parallel or debate to produce better results. We are building the collaboration network among agent teammates — and between humans and agent teammates as well. Ease of use matters. AI intelligence and shared human intelligence are equally important. With simple instructions and tool selection, you can effortlessly build and team up with agent coworkers to deliver complex, systematic work — even assembling a quant team to execute trades. Through the LobeHub community, anyone can discover, reuse, and remix agents and agent groups, customizing them to fit their own workflows, preferences, and needs. Last but not least, our vision started with LobeChat: multi-model support is the most efficient approach for users. We believe different models excel in different scenarios. By routing across multiple models, LobeHub improves cost efficiency and unlocks capabilities that a single-model setup cannot easily support.

Introducing LobeHub: Agent teammates that grow with you. LobeHub is the ultimate space for work and life: to find, build, and collaborate with agent teammates that grow with you. We’re building the world’s first and largest human–agent co-evolving network. Two years ago, we built LobeChat, an open-source interface for using different AI models. Today, LobeChat has 70k+ GitHub stars and serves 6M+ users worldwide. How to fully unlock the power of models has always been a shared mission between us and the community. We started with interaction — a fundamentally new, agent-first experience. Agents are no longer passive tools invoked in a single conversation. They should be proactive, always-on units of work. Treating agents as the minimal atomic unit is also the core of our agent harness infra. Today’s agents are mostly one-off executors. Even with memory, it’s often global — and hallucinates. We build long-term agent teammates that evolve with users. Each agent has its own dedicated memory space, editable by users, allowing humans and agents to co-evolve over time. This, in turn, allows us to design clearer rewards for reinforcement learning and create cleaner environments for continual learning. Agent teammates can work in groups. Through a multi-agent system, agent groups operate faster, more cost-effective, and go beyond what single-agent systems can achieve. For example, a single agent often requires heavy user involvement to proceed step by step, whereas LobeHub can execute the same work from a single instruction, with a supervisor orchestrating agents that run in parallel or debate to produce better results. We are building the collaboration network among agent teammates — and between humans and agent teammates as well. Ease of use matters. AI intelligence and shared human intelligence are equally important. With simple instructions and tool selection, you can effortlessly build and team up with agent coworkers to deliver complex, systematic work — even assembling a quant team to execute trades. Through the LobeHub community, anyone can discover, reuse, and remix agents and agent groups, customizing them to fit their own workflows, preferences, and needs. Last but not least, our vision started with LobeChat: multi-model support is the most efficient approach for users. We believe different models excel in different scenarios. By routing across multiple models, LobeHub improves cost efficiency and unlocks capabilities that a single-model setup cannot easily support.

LobeHub

185,273 views • 6 months ago

SITUATION EXPLAINED: Model fusion, or combining several frontier models into one system, may be better than any single model, sometimes at a lower price. ⿻ Andrew Trask, senior researcher at Google DeepMind: "Model fusion is basically this idea that, when you combine models, they can give you higher accuracy than any of the individual models that you're using." "Some recent studies are actually showing they're able to deliver such a significant jump in accuracy that it's actually a lower cost option than buying some of the premium models." "So for example, there's a few different companies, showing the higher accuracy claims. So Sakana, OpenRouter are all releasing results in the last year/couple months, and we replicated some of it internally at OpenMined." "Some of the most surprising stuff, though, is that they're reaching past Fable level quality with non-Fable models, and in the case of OpenRouter, at half the price."

SITUATION EXPLAINED: Model fusion, or combining several frontier models into one system, may be better than any single model, sometimes at a lower price. ⿻ Andrew Trask, senior researcher at Google DeepMind: "Model fusion is basically this idea that, when you combine models, they can give you higher accuracy than any of the individual models that you're using." "Some recent studies are actually showing they're able to deliver such a significant jump in accuracy that it's actually a lower cost option than buying some of the premium models." "So for example, there's a few different companies, showing the higher accuracy claims. So Sakana, OpenRouter are all releasing results in the last year/couple months, and we replicated some of it internally at OpenMined." "Some of the most surprising stuff, though, is that they're reaching past Fable level quality with non-Fable models, and in the case of OpenRouter, at half the price."

MTS

20,167 views • 1 month ago

“AI MODELS COULD BECOME 10× SMALLER WITHOUT LOSING MOST OF THEIR INTELLIGENCE.” Mark Zuckerberg says one of the most powerful developments in AI is model distillation: taking the capabilities of a much larger model and transferring them into a much smaller one. - Meta's huge frontier models can serve as "teachers" for smaller models. - Zuckerberg says a model could potentially retain around 90–95% of the larger model's intelligence while being only ~10% of its size. - That means dramatically lower inference costs, memory requirements and computing power. - Developers can distill and customize these capabilities for their own applications. And that's where open-source models come into the picture.

“AI MODELS COULD BECOME 10× SMALLER WITHOUT LOSING MOST OF THEIR INTELLIGENCE.” Mark Zuckerberg says one of the most powerful developments in AI is model distillation: taking the capabilities of a much larger model and transferring them into a much smaller one. - Meta's huge frontier models can serve as "teachers" for smaller models. - Zuckerberg says a model could potentially retain around 90–95% of the larger model's intelligence while being only ~10% of its size. - That means dramatically lower inference costs, memory requirements and computing power. - Developers can distill and customize these capabilities for their own applications. And that's where open-source models come into the picture.

SciTech Era

68,477 views • 2 days ago

I'm so confident Triple Whale will make you money that I'm making a bet: If you do over a million dollars/year I'll pay you $250 for 15 minutes of your time. Today we're Introducing the Prime Day Mega Agent, an intelligent Amazon Analyst built to print you money on Prime Day. Here’s what it does, autonomously: – Analyzes Meta, Tiktok and Amazon ad performance – Predicts your winning SKUs using historical trend modeling – Generates a plug-and-play Prime Day playbook: what to pause, scale, test and when + when to send out email campaigns It’s like having a Head of Growth, Media Buying, and Ops in one… Except It works around the clock and leverages more data than any human ever could. We built it because we noticed a critical trend👇 When analyzing Prime Day sales data from last year, we found that the top brands didn’t just edge out the competition, they crushed them. Same tools. Same budgets. Same Prime Day. Yet somehow a small cohort of brands were crushing at a clip we typically don't see... So what were the winners doing that no one else was? We found levers the winners pulled that everyone else missed. Levers like: - Making their PPC target Prime-specific keywords - Warming up email audiences weeks before to build anticipation - Surf-scaling their ads by the hour not by the day on Prime Day Now, you can get that ENTIRE playbook the winners used custom built on your data. This agent is available RIGHT NOW. Go into Moby in Triple Whale and search "Prime Day Mega Agent." If you're a brand doing over a million dollars a year on Amazon, doing Prime Day right isn't a nice to have, it's table stakes. I guarantee you this agent will make you more revenue... And I am putting CASH behind it. If you do over a million/year I'll pay you $250 to take a demo... Limited to the first 100 people to sign up. The link to book is below this tweet. One more thing 🤯 As part of this launch I'm giving away an Amazon Agentic Org Chart the top brands will be using in the next 12 months. It will show you exactly what agents to use and for what, so you can maximize Amazon growth, autonomously. Want it? Retweet and comment "Moby" below and I'll dm you it.

Maxx Blank 🐳

112,769 views • 1 year ago

Google just showed the part of the agent stack most people are still underestimating. Not the model. Not the chat UI. The memory substrate around the agent. In this Antigravity segment, Google describes an agent-first environment built around: - agent conversations - agent-produced artifacts - multi-agent orchestration - subagents - hooks - asynchronous task management That is not a nicer IDE. It is what happens when software stops being a sequence of chats and starts becoming a persistent workforce. Karl's article explains why the winning agents will not just be the ones with the smartest rented model. They will be the ones that remember what they did, what they learned, what changed, and what can be trusted. Full breakdown below.

Google just showed the part of the agent stack most people are still underestimating. Not the model. Not the chat UI. The memory substrate around the agent. In this Antigravity segment, Google describes an agent-first environment built around: - agent conversations - agent-produced artifacts - multi-agent orchestration - subagents - hooks - asynchronous task management That is not a nicer IDE. It is what happens when software stops being a sequence of chats and starts becoming a persistent workforce. Karl's article explains why the winning agents will not just be the ones with the smartest rented model. They will be the ones that remember what they did, what they learned, what changed, and what can be trusted. Full breakdown below.

Karl Mehta

13,930 views • 1 month ago

Sriram Krishnan on why Chinese models can distill off American models but American startups can't: "First of all, every model we have today is distilled off of all human knowledge. If you go back to the original GPT or the original Claude, they all had to derive off crawling the internet, crawling off all of our blogs and tweets and content. They kind of consume human knowledge to bootstrap that." "I'm going to steal this from Dean Meyer of Sequoia, who had a fantastic post yesterday. The situation which is bad today is that some of these models from other countries can train off American models, whereas if you are an American open weight model, it may be really confusing or challenging on whether you can distill off of other American models." "We kind of have a really uneven ecosystem here, where if you're a Chinese model, you could probably get a bunch of reasoning traces. But if you are a new Valley startup and you want to use some reasoning traces, you don't know what the legal situation is." "If you look at any American open source model today, they are using Chinese models as a teacher, or in a way as a part of the fine-tuning process. How do we make sure that is protected and enshrined, so if you're an American model company, you have the same level playing field as the Chinese models?" Sriram Krishnan

Sriram Krishnan on why Chinese models can distill off American models but American startups can't: "First of all, every model we have today is distilled off of all human knowledge. If you go back to the original GPT or the original Claude, they all had to derive off crawling the internet, crawling off all of our blogs and tweets and content. They kind of consume human knowledge to bootstrap that." "I'm going to steal this from Dean Meyer of Sequoia, who had a fantastic post yesterday. The situation which is bad today is that some of these models from other countries can train off American models, whereas if you are an American open weight model, it may be really confusing or challenging on whether you can distill off of other American models." "We kind of have a really uneven ecosystem here, where if you're a Chinese model, you could probably get a bunch of reasoning traces. But if you are a new Valley startup and you want to use some reasoning traces, you don't know what the legal situation is." "If you look at any American open source model today, they are using Chinese models as a teacher, or in a way as a part of the fine-tuning process. How do we make sure that is protected and enshrined, so if you're an American model company, you have the same level playing field as the Chinese models?" Sriram Krishnan

MTS

71,286 views • 21 days ago