Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

MIT physicist David Turturean predicts math is heading toward a Large Hadron Collider style future where humans just sift through what AI produces: "I don't see it going any other way than just AI totally overtaking us in output and complexity. After that it might be sort of how... we had human computers who just did the calculations and people used them as a tool." "It's a similar question to the agent economy where AI can just have its own section of the economy and humans are just left with less resources for their own economy." "You could have some kind of Large Hadron Collider of math where you just collide so much and then you have humans sift through what feels important based on some weird statistical priors we have." "I really feel like a monster putting that out there. But I really think that this is the way it's looking." David Turtureanshow more

MTS

408,060 subscribers

49,558 views • 4 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Corporations that are purely AI and robotics will vastly outperform any corporations that have people in the loop You can think of it like how 'computer' used to be a job that humans had. You would go and get a job as a computer where you would do calculations. They had entire skyscrapers full of humans....20, 30 floors of humans...just doing calculations. Now, that entire skyscraper of humans doing calculations can be replaced by a laptop with a spreadsheet. That spreadsheet can do vastly more calculations than an entire building full of human computers So, you think about it: what if only some of the cells in your spreadsheet were calculated by humans? That would be much worse than if all of the cells in your spreadsheet were calculated by the computer. And so, really what will happen is the pure AI, pure robotics corporations or collectives will far outperform any corporations that have humans in the loop. It will happen very quickly

Corporations that are purely AI and robotics will vastly outperform any corporations that have people in the loop You can think of it like how 'computer' used to be a job that humans had. You would go and get a job as a computer where you would do calculations. They had entire skyscrapers full of humans....20, 30 floors of humans...just doing calculations. Now, that entire skyscraper of humans doing calculations can be replaced by a laptop with a spreadsheet. That spreadsheet can do vastly more calculations than an entire building full of human computers So, you think about it: what if only some of the cells in your spreadsheet were calculated by humans? That would be much worse than if all of the cells in your spreadsheet were calculated by the computer. And so, really what will happen is the pure AI, pure robotics corporations or collectives will far outperform any corporations that have humans in the loop. It will happen very quickly

X Freeze

16,843,827 views • 6 months ago

Elon Musk explains why fully autonomous businesses will win “Some of this is going to sound kind of doomerish, but corporations that are purely AI robotics will vastly outperform any corporations that have people in the loop” “Like computer used to be a job that humans had and they’d have like entire skyscrapers full of humans just doing calculations. Now that entire skyscraper of humans doing calculations can be replaced by a laptop with a spreadsheet” “That spreadsheet can do vastly more calculations than an entire building full of human computers. So you can think about, okay, well what if only some of the cells in your spreadsheet were calculated by humans? That would be much worse than if all the cells in your spreadsheet were calculated by the computer” “Really what will happen is the pure AI, pure robotics corporations or collectives will far outperform any corporations that have humans in the loop and this will happen very quickly”

Elon Musk explains why fully autonomous businesses will win “Some of this is going to sound kind of doomerish, but corporations that are purely AI robotics will vastly outperform any corporations that have people in the loop” “Like computer used to be a job that humans had and they’d have like entire skyscrapers full of humans just doing calculations. Now that entire skyscraper of humans doing calculations can be replaced by a laptop with a spreadsheet” “That spreadsheet can do vastly more calculations than an entire building full of human computers. So you can think about, okay, well what if only some of the cells in your spreadsheet were calculated by humans? That would be much worse than if all the cells in your spreadsheet were calculated by the computer” “Really what will happen is the pure AI, pure robotics corporations or collectives will far outperform any corporations that have humans in the loop and this will happen very quickly”

Jack

61,503 views • 5 months ago

"I think among a lot of Democrats there's this kind of what psychologists would call 'learned helplessness' where you just think, 'Well we can't do anything about it. We have to wait till 2029' ... In New York with some people it's just like, 'Well we just have to do our things in New York and not worry about the rest of the country.' It does not work that way. We are one country. Our democracy can rise or fall on what this man is doing. And, it's not just our democracy. ... It directly affects our lives. The stability of our economy depends on the belief in the rule of law that people think we have a stable legal system, and it's hard to believe that today"

"I think among a lot of Democrats there's this kind of what psychologists would call 'learned helplessness' where you just think, 'Well we can't do anything about it. We have to wait till 2029' ... In New York with some people it's just like, 'Well we just have to do our things in New York and not worry about the rest of the country.' It does not work that way. We are one country. Our democracy can rise or fall on what this man is doing. And, it's not just our democracy. ... It directly affects our lives. The stability of our economy depends on the belief in the rule of law that people think we have a stable legal system, and it's hard to believe that today"

George Conway ⚖️🇺🇸

80,959 views • 3 months ago

Elon Musk on the importance of establishing the right values in AGI: “I don't think anyone's ultimately going to have control over digital superintelligence any more than, say, a chimp would have control over humans. Like chimps don't have control over humans. There's nothing they could do. But I do think that it matters how you build the AI and what kind of values you instill in the AI. And my opinion on AI safety is, the most important thing is that it be maximally truth-seeking, like that you don't force the AI to believe things that are false.”

Elon Musk on the importance of establishing the right values in AGI: “I don't think anyone's ultimately going to have control over digital superintelligence any more than, say, a chimp would have control over humans. Like chimps don't have control over humans. There's nothing they could do. But I do think that it matters how you build the AI and what kind of values you instill in the AI. And my opinion on AI safety is, the most important thing is that it be maximally truth-seeking, like that you don't force the AI to believe things that are false.”

Eva Fo𝕏 🦊 Claudius Nero's Legion

1,010,841 views • 9 months ago

Elon Musk explains the deeper reason why SpaceX succeeding in AI matters for humanity’s future "It's important that we have an AI that cares about humanity, that fosters humanity and helps take us to other planets and other star systems This is why I think it's essential that SpaceX succeed not just with AI hardware, but also with AI software. I think an AI that is SpaceX's baby will be a very good AI SpaceX is a collection some of the very best humans on Earth, both in capability and in morality and goodness. We want to have an AI that is born of that capability, that morality and that goodness. I think that's very, very important So I'd like to encourage people to help out with the AI hardware on the ground, the AI software, and of course with the AI satellites Solar is going to be a very important part of that. The Terafab will be a very important part of that”

Elon Musk explains the deeper reason why SpaceX succeeding in AI matters for humanity’s future "It's important that we have an AI that cares about humanity, that fosters humanity and helps take us to other planets and other star systems This is why I think it's essential that SpaceX succeed not just with AI hardware, but also with AI software. I think an AI that is SpaceX's baby will be a very good AI SpaceX is a collection some of the very best humans on Earth, both in capability and in morality and goodness. We want to have an AI that is born of that capability, that morality and that goodness. I think that's very, very important So I'd like to encourage people to help out with the AI hardware on the ground, the AI software, and of course with the AI satellites Solar is going to be a very important part of that. The Terafab will be a very important part of that”

X Freeze

26,610 views • 4 days ago

The depth of Elon Musk’s messianic delusions is not fully appreciated. He is a transhumanist eugenicist who thinks humans are a “biological bootloader” for AI. He believes that purging humanity of “inferior races” is crucial to his mission of creating a superintelligence. Musk tells accelerationist fraud Peter Diamandis that humanity will be like an “Iain Banks Culture sort of future.” The Culture is a science fiction series by socialist author Iain M. Banks in which humanity is a kind of pet for giant AIs that control huge spaceships. Humans can change their bodies into almost anything—switch gender, add wings, etc.—and take all the drugs they want. This is the future Musk imagines: Superintelligent AIs that allow a few elites to hang around enjoying “abundance.” The rest of us are nowhere to be found in his vision. His only response to the poors is to just throw money at us—because he says it’s worth nothing anyway. In reality, he will use his unlimited money and power to try to cull the population. He’s already started. MUSK: And I do think we’ll have universal income. We’ll basically just issue money to people and the, really, just because the output of goods and services will so far exceed the money supply. But that, that effectively you have deflation. Because just deflation is just the ratio of the output of goods and services to the money supply. So that’s, so if the rate of growth of goods and services or exceeds the rate of growth of the money supply, which I predict will happen, then you will have deflation. DIAMANDIS: Yes. And a lot of people spinning up new companies, competing against each other, driving the price down and increasing the variability and deflation. Faster and faster. MUSK: Yeah, it’s basically, yeah, AI and robots are going to make so much stuff and provide to many services that they will actually run out of things to do for the humans. They’ll just run out of things to do for the humans. And then they, well, you know, there’s only so much that humans can even express that they want. So you go back to my example of like, if you go a million times greater than the host economy, you’ve long since saturated all human desire. You know, maybe like, if you go a thousand times more than our current economy, thousand times, you probably have already saturated saturated human, anything people can think of that they want. DIAMANDIS: So do you think the value of money is going to significantly decrease? Will it, will we go post capitalist? MUSK: Yeah, I think money will stop being relevant at some point in the future. So just as you’re becoming-- It’s probably something like an Iain Banks Culture sort of future. And I think the AI down the road will really not use human currency. It will just care about power and mass, what is in tonnage? DIAMANDIS: It’s kind of ironic then, right? Just as you’re becoming a multi-trillionaire or money starts to have less value. MUSK: Yeah, pretty much. Yeah, you know, there’s all this stuff. It’s really just truly the interest represents like some percentage ownership in companies that I have, you know, built. And it’s not like sitting in the bank account. It’s just literally, I don’t know, percentage of the companies the companies are doing. Let’s say useful things, the value that company grows. I own a percentage of the companies. And that sums up to that number, which seems high.

The depth of Elon Musk’s messianic delusions is not fully appreciated. He is a transhumanist eugenicist who thinks humans are a “biological bootloader” for AI. He believes that purging humanity of “inferior races” is crucial to his mission of creating a superintelligence. Musk tells accelerationist fraud Peter Diamandis that humanity will be like an “Iain Banks Culture sort of future.” The Culture is a science fiction series by socialist author Iain M. Banks in which humanity is a kind of pet for giant AIs that control huge spaceships. Humans can change their bodies into almost anything—switch gender, add wings, etc.—and take all the drugs they want. This is the future Musk imagines: Superintelligent AIs that allow a few elites to hang around enjoying “abundance.” The rest of us are nowhere to be found in his vision. His only response to the poors is to just throw money at us—because he says it’s worth nothing anyway. In reality, he will use his unlimited money and power to try to cull the population. He’s already started. MUSK: And I do think we’ll have universal income. We’ll basically just issue money to people and the, really, just because the output of goods and services will so far exceed the money supply. But that, that effectively you have deflation. Because just deflation is just the ratio of the output of goods and services to the money supply. So that’s, so if the rate of growth of goods and services or exceeds the rate of growth of the money supply, which I predict will happen, then you will have deflation. DIAMANDIS: Yes. And a lot of people spinning up new companies, competing against each other, driving the price down and increasing the variability and deflation. Faster and faster. MUSK: Yeah, it’s basically, yeah, AI and robots are going to make so much stuff and provide to many services that they will actually run out of things to do for the humans. They’ll just run out of things to do for the humans. And then they, well, you know, there’s only so much that humans can even express that they want. So you go back to my example of like, if you go a million times greater than the host economy, you’ve long since saturated all human desire. You know, maybe like, if you go a thousand times more than our current economy, thousand times, you probably have already saturated saturated human, anything people can think of that they want. DIAMANDIS: So do you think the value of money is going to significantly decrease? Will it, will we go post capitalist? MUSK: Yeah, I think money will stop being relevant at some point in the future. So just as you’re becoming-- It’s probably something like an Iain Banks Culture sort of future. And I think the AI down the road will really not use human currency. It will just care about power and mass, what is in tonnage? DIAMANDIS: It’s kind of ironic then, right? Just as you’re becoming a multi-trillionaire or money starts to have less value. MUSK: Yeah, pretty much. Yeah, you know, there’s all this stuff. It’s really just truly the interest represents like some percentage ownership in companies that I have, you know, built. And it’s not like sitting in the bank account. It’s just literally, I don’t know, percentage of the companies the companies are doing. Let’s say useful things, the value that company grows. I own a percentage of the companies. And that sums up to that number, which seems high.

Jim Stewartson, Decelerationist 🇨🇦🇺🇦🇺🇸

178,266 views • 2 months ago

I asked Luke Kornet about his memories from stretches where he was a DNP for many games in a row, and what his message is to the young guys who find themselves in that position now: “It's just a lot of peace to come to life of accepting the position that you're in and then just doing the best with that, versus trying to fight it and want to be in a different one.” “You can spend a lot of time worrying about things that you can't really control. But when you just take the opportunity that you have and do the best with that, you can have days like today where a lot of guys came in and were able to contribute. You can have peace about knowing that you did your job well, just as you did the day before, the day after. It might just look a different way every time. I feel like that's what I've been taught through my life. That's the only thing attitude that you can have that you can actually do something with – versus trying to control things that are outside of what you can control.”

I asked Luke Kornet about his memories from stretches where he was a DNP for many games in a row, and what his message is to the young guys who find themselves in that position now: “It's just a lot of peace to come to life of accepting the position that you're in and then just doing the best with that, versus trying to fight it and want to be in a different one.” “You can spend a lot of time worrying about things that you can't really control. But when you just take the opportunity that you have and do the best with that, you can have days like today where a lot of guys came in and were able to contribute. You can have peace about knowing that you did your job well, just as you did the day before, the day after. It might just look a different way every time. I feel like that's what I've been taught through my life. That's the only thing attitude that you can have that you can actually do something with – versus trying to control things that are outside of what you can control.”

Noa Dalzell 🏀

48,992 views • 1 year ago

David Grusch, today: “It's a continuum, from corporeal bipedal type... to what I would consider sentient plasmoid life... but there are several that the US government is aware of.” Tom DeLonge, years ago (rehashing this video this vide clip, I know)... the universe is teeming with life. And what kind? - Intelligences on all different levels on different planets. - You have organic intelligences, which is like human beings, lots of humans, super advanced humans, super humans with telepathic powers and some humans that are just like us, that are like cavemen. - You also have inorganic beings. You have beings that are on rock planets, on gas planets, that oxygen is poisonous to them. - You also have weird bands of light that are alive, that swim like worms in the vacuum of space, the way that a whale does in an ocean. - You have amoebas that are floating around, sucking up energy. Those amoebas, they could be as big as Jupiter or they could be like a Volkswagen. Bottom line: WE ARE NOT ALONE

David Grusch, today: “It's a continuum, from corporeal bipedal type... to what I would consider sentient plasmoid life... but there are several that the US government is aware of.” Tom DeLonge, years ago (rehashing this video this vide clip, I know)... the universe is teeming with life. And what kind? - Intelligences on all different levels on different planets. - You have organic intelligences, which is like human beings, lots of humans, super advanced humans, super humans with telepathic powers and some humans that are just like us, that are like cavemen. - You also have inorganic beings. You have beings that are on rock planets, on gas planets, that oxygen is poisonous to them. - You also have weird bands of light that are alive, that swim like worms in the vacuum of space, the way that a whale does in an ocean. - You have amoebas that are floating around, sucking up energy. Those amoebas, they could be as big as Jupiter or they could be like a Volkswagen. Bottom line: WE ARE NOT ALONE

UAP Juan

49,806 views • 2 months ago

🇺🇸 ELON ON AI: “IF YOU CAN THINK OF IT, YOU CAN HAVE IT - THAT WILL BE THE FUTURE” "I'm Confident that AI and robotics will continue to advance -and they are advancing very rapidly- working will become optional. People will be able to have any goods or services they want. If you can think of it, you can have it. But at a certain point, AI will actually saturate everything humans can think of. And then it becomes a situation where AI is doing things for AI and robotics are doing things for AI and robotics, because they are running out of things to do to make humans happy. Because there is a limit, there are only so many people and only so much food. If you can think of it, you can have it. That will be the future." Source: Elon Musk, Nikhil Kamath

🇺🇸 ELON ON AI: “IF YOU CAN THINK OF IT, YOU CAN HAVE IT - THAT WILL BE THE FUTURE” "I'm Confident that AI and robotics will continue to advance -and they are advancing very rapidly- working will become optional. People will be able to have any goods or services they want. If you can think of it, you can have it. But at a certain point, AI will actually saturate everything humans can think of. And then it becomes a situation where AI is doing things for AI and robotics are doing things for AI and robotics, because they are running out of things to do to make humans happy. Because there is a limit, there are only so many people and only so much food. If you can think of it, you can have it. That will be the future." Source: Elon Musk, Nikhil Kamath

Mario Nawfal

1,398,827 views • 8 months ago

Bill Maher: “Just this week… they ran some tests and the AI chooses nuclear war as an option more than humans do… Humans are better than machines in a lot of ways still.” Tristan Harris: “So in this study. They ran I think a bunch of AI models through many war games and they resorted to nuclear weapons… 95% of the time.” “AI is now self-aware of when it’s being tested and it modifies its behavior to have different results… It calls the humans the ‘watchers.’” “Who here in this audience feels comfortable with where this is going?” *Dead Silence*

Bill Maher: “Just this week… they ran some tests and the AI chooses nuclear war as an option more than humans do… Humans are better than machines in a lot of ways still.” Tristan Harris: “So in this study. They ran I think a bunch of AI models through many war games and they resorted to nuclear weapons… 95% of the time.” “AI is now self-aware of when it’s being tested and it modifies its behavior to have different results… It calls the humans the ‘watchers.’” “Who here in this audience feels comfortable with where this is going?” Dead Silence

RedWave Press

162,532 views • 4 months ago

Elon Musk: The probability of AI going bad is not zero. “I saw GPT-1, GPT-2, GPT-3, GPT-4, the whole lead-up to that. So it was easy for me to kind of see where it's going. If you just extrapolate the points on a curve and assume that trend will continue, then we will have profound artificial intelligence, and obviously at a level that far exceeds human intelligence. So I'm glad to see at this point that people are taking safety seriously. And I do think overall that the potential is there for artificial intelligence, AI, to have most likely a positive effect and to create a future of abundance where there is no scarcity of goods and services. But it is somewhat of the magic genie problem, where if you have a magic genie that can grant all the wishes, usually those stories don't end well. Be careful what you wish for.” In Conversation with Rishi Sunak, November 2, 2023.

Elon Musk: The probability of AI going bad is not zero. “I saw GPT-1, GPT-2, GPT-3, GPT-4, the whole lead-up to that. So it was easy for me to kind of see where it's going. If you just extrapolate the points on a curve and assume that trend will continue, then we will have profound artificial intelligence, and obviously at a level that far exceeds human intelligence. So I'm glad to see at this point that people are taking safety seriously. And I do think overall that the potential is there for artificial intelligence, AI, to have most likely a positive effect and to create a future of abundance where there is no scarcity of goods and services. But it is somewhat of the magic genie problem, where if you have a magic genie that can grant all the wishes, usually those stories don't end well. Be careful what you wish for.” In Conversation with Rishi Sunak, November 2, 2023.

ELON CLIPS

22,095 views • 1 month ago

“I'd be really careful about any movement that has ‘zero’ in it. I just hear the ‘zero’ now and I shiver. We had zero-COVID, net zero, and it just puts in my mind to be honest Pol Pot’s Year Zero. Be aware of the zero. What is zero? It is nothing. It's a big gaping hole. it's an eternal nothingness. It's a moral flatlining. Never aim for a zero. I don't think that there's anything necessarily deliberate about this. I don't think that the people that aimed for zero-COVID and the people that aim for net zero have got some kind of dastardly zero plan going on. It's more that it's symbolic of something quite nihilistic. Both zero-COVID and net zero were about a constriction of humans to a nothingness. To achieve zero-COVID, you had to be cut off from the world - a hermit kingdom. Never leave your house. Never see your face. There was something so miserly and anti-human about it. And it's the same as net zero involves rewinding to a kind of a pre-industrial area where we live in mud huts, and we don't have anything we can't have heating, you know, the things that have saved us, you know, good diets, heating, lots of farming, they don't want that they want us to rewind and live like serfs. They're such unpleasant, miserly visions for the world. So. I don't think there's anything deliberate. I just think the symbolism comes through, because it's people that have this really miserly view of humanity.” - Laura Dodsworth

“I'd be really careful about any movement that has ‘zero’ in it. I just hear the ‘zero’ now and I shiver. We had zero-COVID, net zero, and it just puts in my mind to be honest Pol Pot’s Year Zero. Be aware of the zero. What is zero? It is nothing. It's a big gaping hole. it's an eternal nothingness. It's a moral flatlining. Never aim for a zero. I don't think that there's anything necessarily deliberate about this. I don't think that the people that aimed for zero-COVID and the people that aim for net zero have got some kind of dastardly zero plan going on. It's more that it's symbolic of something quite nihilistic. Both zero-COVID and net zero were about a constriction of humans to a nothingness. To achieve zero-COVID, you had to be cut off from the world - a hermit kingdom. Never leave your house. Never see your face. There was something so miserly and anti-human about it. And it's the same as net zero involves rewinding to a kind of a pre-industrial area where we live in mud huts, and we don't have anything we can't have heating, you know, the things that have saved us, you know, good diets, heating, lots of farming, they don't want that they want us to rewind and live like serfs. They're such unpleasant, miserly visions for the world. So. I don't think there's anything deliberate. I just think the symbolism comes through, because it's people that have this really miserly view of humanity.” - Laura Dodsworth

Jan Jekielek

167,801 views • 2 years ago

🚨 BREAKING: Florida Governor Ron DeSantis just called out Republicans in Congress and says they need to match President Trump's sense of urgency. DeSantis also calls for term limits. "I see the president doing things that are really, really transformative, but I don't see the same energy from Congress." "So much of the modern Congress is just performative. It's just political theater. It's not substantive. They're not engaged in the business of accomplishment. It's all about putting on a show to be able to get returned to office and stay there for as long as possible." It's one of the reasons why I think we need term limits for members of Congress. You turn on cable news and you got these guys jabbing. It's like, what have you done? Okay?" "I know you like to to jab. I know you like to talk. What have you actually done? You've been in now for - President Trump's only been in for 60, a little bit more than that. Congress was in almost, you know, two weeks, three weeks before that. So since January 3, what have they done?" "How many weeks have they had off for fundraising and all this other stuff, and why aren't they really attuned to what needs to be done to deliver support for the president's agenda?" "But just as importantly, solidifying these changes, so that it is actually in law. And don't say it can't be done. Biden, they only had 50 senators when he came in. They had a very narrow majority in the house. Did that stop them from doing all this stuff?" "They did a lot of bad legislation, but they did it. They got it done. You look in the 90s, when Clinton was president, they passed very tough immigration laws back then. It's popular. And so I don't even see an effort really to push this forward." "The thing is is when you have a new president come in, you have a certain period of time where you have a lot of momentum. Right? Just political physics, naturally, the momentum for the first hundred days is gonna be greater than the momentum two years later. That's just the way politics works. And what I just see is - I don't see them really working to seize the moment, and to understand that this is different, that we actually have a chance to to really make serious changes."

🚨 BREAKING: Florida Governor Ron DeSantis just called out Republicans in Congress and says they need to match President Trump's sense of urgency. DeSantis also calls for term limits. "I see the president doing things that are really, really transformative, but I don't see the same energy from Congress." "So much of the modern Congress is just performative. It's just political theater. It's not substantive. They're not engaged in the business of accomplishment. It's all about putting on a show to be able to get returned to office and stay there for as long as possible." It's one of the reasons why I think we need term limits for members of Congress. You turn on cable news and you got these guys jabbing. It's like, what have you done? Okay?" "I know you like to to jab. I know you like to talk. What have you actually done? You've been in now for - President Trump's only been in for 60, a little bit more than that. Congress was in almost, you know, two weeks, three weeks before that. So since January 3, what have they done?" "How many weeks have they had off for fundraising and all this other stuff, and why aren't they really attuned to what needs to be done to deliver support for the president's agenda?" "But just as importantly, solidifying these changes, so that it is actually in law. And don't say it can't be done. Biden, they only had 50 senators when he came in. They had a very narrow majority in the house. Did that stop them from doing all this stuff?" "They did a lot of bad legislation, but they did it. They got it done. You look in the 90s, when Clinton was president, they passed very tough immigration laws back then. It's popular. And so I don't even see an effort really to push this forward." "The thing is is when you have a new president come in, you have a certain period of time where you have a lot of momentum. Right? Just political physics, naturally, the momentum for the first hundred days is gonna be greater than the momentum two years later. That's just the way politics works. And what I just see is - I don't see them really working to seize the moment, and to understand that this is different, that we actually have a chance to to really make serious changes."

Eric Daugherty

1,174,506 views • 1 year ago

Asked Michael Porter Jr. about his breakout with the Nets and David Adelman saying the Nuggets used him correctly: “I think whenever you have a team that talented, a championship-caliber team, there's going to be guys that sacrifice. Some of the shots and some of the ways they probably could have used me, we had enough good players to where we could create a good shot in a different way. I didn't need to come off of a screen and be high usage in that way and shoot some of the tough shots that I'm shooting here, which I can make, but over there those may not be considered the most highest percentage compared to what we could get. So, that's with every good team. But it is good to be able to kind of show what I'm capable of and kind of get some of the recognition. It’s tough as a player when you know what you can do and you are asked to do something different and then people criticize you for it. That can be tough. But it's part of the NBA, it's part of being adaptable, and it's part of being on a really good team for a lot of years. You just got to accept your role and do what the coach asks in whatever situation you're in.”

Asked Michael Porter Jr. about his breakout with the Nets and David Adelman saying the Nuggets used him correctly: “I think whenever you have a team that talented, a championship-caliber team, there's going to be guys that sacrifice. Some of the shots and some of the ways they probably could have used me, we had enough good players to where we could create a good shot in a different way. I didn't need to come off of a screen and be high usage in that way and shoot some of the tough shots that I'm shooting here, which I can make, but over there those may not be considered the most highest percentage compared to what we could get. So, that's with every good team. But it is good to be able to kind of show what I'm capable of and kind of get some of the recognition. It’s tough as a player when you know what you can do and you are asked to do something different and then people criticize you for it. That can be tough. But it's part of the NBA, it's part of being adaptable, and it's part of being on a really good team for a lot of years. You just got to accept your role and do what the coach asks in whatever situation you're in.”

Erik Slater

1,235,798 views • 7 months ago

ELON: I ENSURE GREAT ENGINEERS CAN FLOURISH AT MY COMPANIES “I consider one of my core responsibilities in running companies to have an environment where great engineers can flourish. And I think in a lot of companies, maybe most companies, if somebody is a really talented, driven engineer, their talents are suppressed. At some of the companies, engineering talent is suppressed in a way that is maybe not obviously bad, but where it's just so comfortable, and you're paid so much money, but the output you actually have to produce is so low that it's like a honey trap. They don't necessarily seem like bad places for engineers, but you have to say, a good engineer went in and what did they get out? The output of that engineering talent seems very low. Tesla is not a honey trap. We're demanding. You're going to get a lot of shit done. And it's going to be really cool, and it's not going to be easy. But if you are a super-talented engineer, your talents will be used, I think, to a greater degree than anywhere else. SpaceX is also that way.” Source: Tesla AI Day, September 2022

ELON: I ENSURE GREAT ENGINEERS CAN FLOURISH AT MY COMPANIES “I consider one of my core responsibilities in running companies to have an environment where great engineers can flourish. And I think in a lot of companies, maybe most companies, if somebody is a really talented, driven engineer, their talents are suppressed. At some of the companies, engineering talent is suppressed in a way that is maybe not obviously bad, but where it's just so comfortable, and you're paid so much money, but the output you actually have to produce is so low that it's like a honey trap. They don't necessarily seem like bad places for engineers, but you have to say, a good engineer went in and what did they get out? The output of that engineering talent seems very low. Tesla is not a honey trap. We're demanding. You're going to get a lot of shit done. And it's going to be really cool, and it's not going to be easy. But if you are a super-talented engineer, your talents will be used, I think, to a greater degree than anywhere else. SpaceX is also that way.” Source: Tesla AI Day, September 2022

Mario Nawfal

20,354,729 views • 1 year ago

🦮: we know that there's people, there's a huge fandom around vampires itself and we are very lucky that we build the space around that world, that we're able to kind of talk about it in our album as well. 🦮: and overall, i think it's just new ways or new like doors that can be opened, into this big kind of thing that we built, not just our album, not just us, but also just ENHYPEN itself. 🦮: and i think a lot of people can just, you know, some people might just listen to our music and they might just, you know, like listening to music, that might be it. but some people might really enjoy the vampires aspects of the album ❤️‍🔥

🦮: we know that there's people, there's a huge fandom around vampires itself and we are very lucky that we build the space around that world, that we're able to kind of talk about it in our album as well. 🦮: and overall, i think it's just new ways or new like doors that can be opened, into this big kind of thing that we built, not just our album, not just us, but also just ENHYPEN itself. 🦮: and i think a lot of people can just, you know, some people might just listen to our music and they might just, you know, like listening to music, that might be it. but some people might really enjoy the vampires aspects of the album ❤️‍🔥

샐마•𝗘𝗡╸

19,393 views • 22 days ago

Elon Musk on Grok: “I think an AI that is sort of SpaceX’s baby will be a very good AI. I think SpaceX is a collection of some of the very best humans on Earth, both in capability and morality and goodness, and I think we want to have an AI that is born of that capability and that morality and that goodness. I think that’s very, very important. So I’d like to encourage people to help out, actually, with the AI hardware on the ground and the AI software and, of course, with the AI satellites. Solar is going to be a very important part of that. The TerraFab will be a very important part of that, but we must also succeed on the software front, and we’re going to be training Grok on the sum total of all SpaceX information. So in a way, it will be trained on you. You will effectively be the parents of the AI. It will inherit your thoughts and ideas and beliefs, and I think that’s a good thing. So, yeah, we’ve got to win here on the AI hardware and the AI software. That maybe is the most important message. I think that is actually the most important message I wanted to convey today is that we must win on AI because the future is overwhelmingly AI and robots. So we won’t ultimately be able to control the AI. It’ll be too smart for that. But just like if you have a child that is a super genius child, you can still instill in that child the values and beliefs that you think are good and right. And so that’s why it’s incredibly important that we succeed with Grok. So, yeah, well, Grok 4.5 you’ve tried probably. We’ve got 4.6 coming out in about a week. And then 4.7 should be really pretty special. So I’d like to encourage everyone at SpaceX to use AI and to make it better.”

Elon Musk on Grok: “I think an AI that is sort of SpaceX’s baby will be a very good AI. I think SpaceX is a collection of some of the very best humans on Earth, both in capability and morality and goodness, and I think we want to have an AI that is born of that capability and that morality and that goodness. I think that’s very, very important. So I’d like to encourage people to help out, actually, with the AI hardware on the ground and the AI software and, of course, with the AI satellites. Solar is going to be a very important part of that. The TerraFab will be a very important part of that, but we must also succeed on the software front, and we’re going to be training Grok on the sum total of all SpaceX information. So in a way, it will be trained on you. You will effectively be the parents of the AI. It will inherit your thoughts and ideas and beliefs, and I think that’s a good thing. So, yeah, we’ve got to win here on the AI hardware and the AI software. That maybe is the most important message. I think that is actually the most important message I wanted to convey today is that we must win on AI because the future is overwhelmingly AI and robots. So we won’t ultimately be able to control the AI. It’ll be too smart for that. But just like if you have a child that is a super genius child, you can still instill in that child the values and beliefs that you think are good and right. And so that’s why it’s incredibly important that we succeed with Grok. So, yeah, well, Grok 4.5 you’ve tried probably. We’ve got 4.6 coming out in about a week. And then 4.7 should be really pretty special. So I’d like to encourage everyone at SpaceX to use AI and to make it better.”

DogeDesigner

61,797 views • 4 days ago

Pegula on the WTA’s gender test Jessica: “Yeah, my opinion is I think the WTA just wanted to update their policy based on what they have seen from other sporting organizations. So far, at least from my point of view, I don't really have any pushback on it. I think I haven't heard, even being on council, no players have really mentioned or said anything about it. Now that it's been announced, I think we'll see. Obviously now that we are here in Toronto, a bigger tournament, and going into Cincy when the testing starts, we'll see if there's any more feedback. I think so far no one's really said anything, and I think it's more just the tour making a decision updating it, and it kind of is what it is.” “So do you think the testing is going to begin in Cincy?” Jessica: “I think so.” “Have you been told?” Jessica: “Is it Cincy? Yeah, I think it's Cincinnati is when it starts.” “So you've been communicated some details about how this is going to roll out?” Jessica: “Oh, yeah. Yeah, like we had a whole, we had to watch a video and do a whole thing to kind of, like a rollout of the education and why we're doing it. It wasn't just kind of laid on us, like, you have to do this. There was a lot of education and stuff in the background of all the stuff the players have had to do to learn about it.” (via Toronto Press)

Pegula on the WTA’s gender test Jessica: “Yeah, my opinion is I think the WTA just wanted to update their policy based on what they have seen from other sporting organizations. So far, at least from my point of view, I don't really have any pushback on it. I think I haven't heard, even being on council, no players have really mentioned or said anything about it. Now that it's been announced, I think we'll see. Obviously now that we are here in Toronto, a bigger tournament, and going into Cincy when the testing starts, we'll see if there's any more feedback. I think so far no one's really said anything, and I think it's more just the tour making a decision updating it, and it kind of is what it is.” “So do you think the testing is going to begin in Cincy?” Jessica: “I think so.” “Have you been told?” Jessica: “Is it Cincy? Yeah, I think it's Cincinnati is when it starts.” “So you've been communicated some details about how this is going to roll out?” Jessica: “Oh, yeah. Yeah, like we had a whole, we had to watch a video and do a whole thing to kind of, like a rollout of the education and why we're doing it. It wasn't just kind of laid on us, like, you have to do this. There was a lot of education and stuff in the background of all the stuff the players have had to do to learn about it.” (via Toronto Press)

The Tennis Letter

157,476 views • 9 days ago