Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

MLLMs are great at understanding videos, but struggle with spatial reasoning—like estimating distances or tracking objects across time. the bottleneck? getting precise 3D spatial annotations on real videos is expensive and error-prone. introducing SIMS-V 🤖 [1/n]

16,480 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Depth Any Video with Scalable Synthetic Data AI physicists and chemists continue to make strides in depth estimation from video. Check out this new paper featuring some impressive examples. See the thread for more details (unfortunately no code yet). Abstract: Video depth estimation has long been hindered by the scarcity of consistent and scalable ground truth data, leading to inconsistent and unreliable results. In this paper, we introduce Depth Any Video, a model that tackles the challenge through two key innovations. First, we develop a scalable synthetic data pipeline, capturing real-time video depth data from diverse game environments, yielding 40,000 video clips of 5-second duration, each with precise depth annotations. Second, we leverage the powerful priors of generative video diffusion models to handle real-world videos effectively, integrating advanced techniques such as rotary position encoding and flow matching to further enhance flexibility and efficiency. Unlike previous models, which are limited to fixed-length video sequences, our approach introduces a novel mixed-duration training strategy that handles videos of varying lengths and performs robustly across different frame rates 0 - even on single frames. At inference, we propose a depth interpolation method that enables our model to infer high-resolution video depth across sequences of up to 150 frames. Our model outperforms all previous generative depth models in terms of spatial accuracy and temporal consistency.

MrNeRF

27,428 просмотров • 1 год назад

Does LLM really need to be a helpful assistant all the time? No. If you want to simulate people, “perfectly helpful” could be the wrong objective. Meet OdysSim, a journey toward LLMs beyond assistants, as behavioral foundation models (10B tokens of real human behavior; 23 sim benchmarks, finally in one place. new open models: outperform or on par with GPT-5.5, Gemini 3.1, or Claude Opus 4.7 in many behavior-sim dimensions). Human behavior simulation is becoming essential. Agent evaluation needs realistic users before real users show up. Medical and classroom training need realistic patients and students. Social science needs synthetic participants at scale. But real people are not ideal assistants. Real patients panic or ignore good advice. Real students misunderstand. Real customers are vague, picky, impatient, or simply leave. Human behavior is messy, diverse, and often imperfect. Frontier LLMs are getting better at math, code, and long-horizon tasks. They are NOT getting better at simulating human behavior. If anything, they drift the other way: more assistant-ish, more homogeneous, fewer of the errors and quirks real humans show. This is no accident. The whole pipeline is built for helpfulness and task success, not behavioral realism. And you can't prompt your way out of that. So we rethink the recipe from scratch and release: 🧠 The OdysSim corpus: 21.4M real human interactions (~10B tokens) from 62 sources, every conversation retrofitted with social grounding (who is talking, and why) 📏 SOUL-Index: 23 human-behavior benchmarks unified into one suite across 5 axes 🤖 OSim-8B: open weights; tops more SOUL-Index benchmarks than any frontier model, acts more like a real user than any of them on τ-bench (nearly matching real humans in the reaction dimension), and writes far more human-like text along the way.

Xuhui Zhou

143,100 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

I've been researching Agents for the past 6 months and collected 40+ materials on the most capable architectures & implementations. The intent was to publish a comprehensive overview, like I did on RAG techniques, but been too busy with so sharing it here. There are some great intro lectures by Andrew Ng to start with. The following types of Agentic architectures are covered: 🤖 Chain of thought (Plan & Execute agent) 🤖 Tooling operators (An agent upon a set of tools, routing to them) - good for connecting external data storage & APIs, pretty fast and robust 🤖 ReAct (Thought - Action - Observation) - capable of iteratively executing complex tasks or answering complex queries 🤖 Self-Reflection - (Action - Observation / Evaluation - Reflection - Planning) - adds some quality and reasoning clarity compared to the ReAct scheme, might be slower 🤖 Agent upon agents (A multiagent scheme) - a quite complex setting, slow, but capable of executing very complex multistep tasks, not super robust as loops are a frequent issue. Most successful projects: AutoGPT, AgentGPT, MemGPT, GPT-Researcher, CrewAI, MetaGPT. There are also some arXiv papers & blog posts on the most important architectures. 🔗 All the materials are here: 🧠 The best part is there is a co-pilot to chat with all this knowledge! If you’d like to add some valuable publications on Agents to this collection - just share a link in the comments 👇

IVAN ILIN

113,984 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Introducing Kaleido💮 from AI at Meta — a universal generative neural rendering engine for photorealistic, unified object and scene view synthesis. Kaleido is built on a simple but powerful design philosophy: 3D perception is a form of visual common sense. Following this idea, we formulate rendering purely as a sequence-to-sequence generation problem, successfully unifying neural rendering with the architecture principles behind modern language and video models. Unlike traditional neural rendering methods, Kaleido learns 3D purely in a data-driven way, without explicit 3D representations or structures. It acquires spatial understanding directly through large-scale video pretraining, then multi-view 3D data finetuning, inspired by how LLMs acquire textual common sense from large corpora before specialising in domains like coding. Through extensive ablations, we progressively modernised the architecture design and training strategies and tackled key scaling challenges in sequence-to-sequence generative rendering, arriving at a design that’s simple, versatile, and scalable. Kaleido significantly outperforms prior generative models in few-view settings, and remarkably is the first zero-shot generative method matches InstantNGP-level rendering quality in multi-view settings. We view Kaleido also as an alternative step towards world modeling that flexibly spans a spectrum of “realities": with many views, it faithfully reconstructs grounded reality; with fewer views, it imagines plausible unseen details. 🔗 Explore more results and paper:

Shikun Liu

22,464 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад