"Monero is what Bitcoin should've been." Charles Hoskinson explains why monero:native is what bitcoin:native should have been if the tech existed in 2009. Do you agree, or is Bitcoin's transparency its greatest strength? 👇

Monero will shock everyone.

OMG you guys actually dared say the forbidden M word?

Everyone loves Monero, and Monero chan loves you 🫵

👏👏👏👏👏 followed

FT. @IOHK_Charles @davidgokhshtein @MidnightNtwrk

Bitcoin was the perfect trojan horse for cryptography as money

Ergo you mean

Charles would know after all “he is Satoshi” @Midnightmittt

Ok guess hes not as crazy as I thought.

Welcome

I like Charles he really pushes projects that have kept building. I

my guy get a proper bitcoiner on before you talk to this scammer piece of shit. "is Bitcoin's transparency its greatest strength?" Are you a retard?

BSV: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System

I seriously doubt that under Satoshi's guidance Bitcoin would have become as private and uncompromising as Monero is. Monero feels like a separate species, a pure extension of the idea of private money. I doubt Satoshi would have made Bitcoin fully private by default. That role probably fits Zcash better with its optional shielded transactions. Not a Zcash supporter, but let's not confuse concepts and history. Despite all the variety, I'd still choose Monero as the standard for money and sovereignty. Perfect mix of decentralization and privacy. No need for compromises when you can simply use both BTC/LTC and XMR. I'll repeat it: There's no way Satoshi would have gotten rid of the public ledger. More likely, it would have been optional, and not necessarily based on the same technology that Monero relies on.

Bring them together!