Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

MONOLOGUE: Rules-based order was always a lie Carney is over Bubbly doubly. Danes sanction Ozempic, Marco Rubio in withdrawal. Chinese EVs flood the market, goodbye Detroit. Comrade Trump Follow #MOATS 519 #Denmark #MarkCarney #Ozempic #champagne

16,696 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

2/ WATCH. Neville Roy Singham in his own words supporting the 'new world order' of Xi Jinping and the Chinese Communist Party The grand jury investigation follows a five-part series we published Fox News Digital in March. In the series, I unearthed a 4:13 speech in which Neville Roy Singham stood on a stage at the Golden Tulip Hotel on Nov. 13, 2025, for a conference of the "Global South Academic Forum," coincidentally just days after the Goldman Sachs' chief was in Beijing. Tricontinental Ltd., a Singham-funded nonprofit, co-sponsored the event with academic institutions administered by the Chinese Communist Party. On stage, Singham openly supported a "new world order" promoted by Chinese President Xi Jinping and the Chinese Communist Party. During the speech, he called the United States a "fascist" nation, echoing the propaganda of the Chinese Communist Party now also parroted on the streets by communist, socialist and Democratic Party activists. Thank you to DataRepublican (small r) and Xi Van Fleet for their intelligent support throughout this investigation, connecting data points in history and the modern day. Full transcript of this clip: 28: 10 — This facist lie that the West says that there is a battle between fascism, democracy and communism. 28:18 — They make a fake argument that there are three systems. I think Vijay has done a very good job of explaining that in fact fascism is actually a face of capitalism and imperialism as is colonialism. 28:28 — These are the three faces of a system that quite now is getting very very dangerous for us. The reason I think this study and the role of the global south academic forum and of China is this moment of history if we want to understand international rules-based order which is their favorite term. 28:49 — It was the Americans who took the uh Japanese uh scientist who conducted biological experiments against the Chinese, put them in in off of any uh uh punishment. 29:02 — It was the English who took the Italian fascists and made sure they were not charged. The international rules-based order was created by another lie which was that the fascists were all protected by the Americans and put into power in their countries in Japan and in Italy. 29:19 — If we want to therefore have a new world's order that is based on multilateralism that President Xi and CPC and China have proposed, we have to undo the ideological damage that has been done by the narrative of World War II.

Asra Nomani

59,227 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Mark Carney’s 2026 Davos speech is the “White Flag” of the Western liberal order. By “taking the sign out of the window,” Carney has confirmed what Arnaud Bertrand brilliantly noted: The West has irremediably lost the Second Cold War. Why? Because a Cold War requires two competing systems, and Carney just admitted the Western one no longer exists. To understand this collapse, we must look at the evolution of Cold War metaphors: 🔹 1946 (Kennan): The USSR as an “insane patient” needing containment. 🔹 2020 (Eric Li): The US as the “Late-Soviet” power, decaying from within while China builds domestic resilience. (see the video below) 🔹 2026 (Carney): The “Shopkeeper” (Havel) who finally stops performing the “pleasant fiction” of a rules-based order. This is the strategic victory of Eric Li’s “Short Telegram.” In 2020, Li argued China should not “single-handedly challenge” the liberal camp but let it crumble under its own internal contradictions. He predicted that Western “political decay” would eventually force an admission of reality. Carney’s speech proves China is winning by not playing the West’s game. While the West is fragmenting into a “world of fortresses,” China is executing Li’s strategy: focusing on “spiritual civilization,” domestic strength, and “variable geometry” coalitions like the Belt and Road. As Carney dumps “nostalgia” for a world of “value-based realism,” he is essentially acknowledging that sovereignty is now anchored in the “ability to withstand pressure”—a core tenet of China’s long-term resilience strategy. When a system’s chief architects admit it was an “asymmetrical fiction,” the “collective belief” that sustains power shatters. This shift from private doubt to common knowledge is the ultimate systemic cascade. Is this the birth of a true multipolar world, or just a “poorer, more fragile” era of fragmenting hegemons? If the “Rules-Based Order” is officially dead, what fills the vacuum? Let’s discuss. 👇 #Davos2026 #MarkCarney #EricLi #Geopolitics #NewColdWar #China #GlobalOrder

Kakajusaiyou

10,474 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

CBS Sunday Morning went to a London auto showroom and interviewed British car owners, traditional dealers and industry experts about the rise of Chinese EVs in Europe. What they found quietly destroys a lot of American mythology. British car owner Justin Watson is replacing his Lexus with a BYD. He described the ride as “like sitting on a throne” and said its technology, comfort and handling surpassed anything he had driven before. His conclusion was blunt: The era of “cheap Chinese cars don’t last” is over. A London dealer with more than 50 years in the business, long associated with Volkswagen, said he never imagined he would one day sell Chinese cars. Then he saw the quality, the technology and the sales growth. He changed his mind. Ben Nelmes of New Automotive explained why. Chinese EV makers now hold major advantages across batteries, supply chains and manufacturing integration. BYD started with batteries and built upward, controlling far more of its own production chain and allowing it to make cars at least 25% cheaper than Western competitors. And the technology is no longer “cheap imitation.” Chinese EVs are producing the things Western social media keeps going viral over: 360-degree tank turns. Emergency floating capability. Ultra-long range. Charging from 10% to 70% in minutes. The old stereotype of “Made in China = cheap and inferior” is collapsing in real time. Then comes the American part. The Biden administration imposed a 100% tariff on Chinese EVs. Trump kept the wall in place. In practical terms, Chinese EVs are shut out of the U.S. market. When CBS asked whether that protects American jobs, Nelmes gave the more uncomfortable answer: protectionism may protect jobs in the short term, but over time it kills competition, slows innovation, weakens consumer choice and leaves domestic automakers sheltered from the very future they are supposed to compete in. If the future of cars is electric, then blocking the world’s strongest EV competitors does not prepare American automakers for that future. It protects them from it. The irony gets worse. Before the segment ended, the British owner laughed that he had relatives in New Jersey who were “absolutely jealous” that he could drive such a good Chinese car. And here is the fact protectionists cannot explain away: BYD is effectively shut out of the U.S. market behind a 100% tariff wall, while Tesla is allowed to sell normally in China. And BYD still became the world’s top-selling battery-electric vehicle maker. China did not need to ban Tesla to compete with it. It let Tesla enter. Build locally. Sell freely. Fight for Chinese consumers. The United States looked at BYD and chose a wall. Yet even without access to the American market, BYD still outsold Tesla globally. That says more about competitiveness than a thousand speeches about “fair competition.” If your company needs its biggest rival excluded from your home market while that rival beats you everywhere else, you are not defending competitiveness. You are hiding from it.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

15,632 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen

NEW: 🚨 FIVE EYES IS ANTI-AMERICAN 🚨 Why are we still funding the intelligence services of nations that don’t share our values? As I have reported, the “FIVE EYES” intelligence sharing relationship no longer serves America’s interests. The United States gives the “keys to the kingdom” to foreign governments that hate us and our values. For example, the UK and Australia have been fully conquered by Islam. The Steele Dossier— which the Russia collusion hoax was based off of—came from British Intelligence. The “British” Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood MP is a violent Pakistani Muslim who has said that Islam guides everything she does in life. Australia’s government in Canberra recently humiliated their own sailors aboard the USS Charlotte, ordering them to stand down when the US military torpedoed an Iranian frigate. Source: The Five Eyes relationship is not codified in law or a treaty. NSA/CSS Director Rudd should advise President Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio Secretary Marco Rubio that this agreement no longer benefits us, and cancel it immediately. During the March 26th cabinet meeting, President Trump questioned why the United Kingdom and Australia didn’t have our backs in the recent military operation in Iran. Alliances change over time. President Trump has recently eviscerated NATO for their failure to assist us in Iran and Secretary Marco Rubio has asked how NATO benefits the US. Source: President Trump is right to ask the question: why should we support governments that don’t support us? Cancel FIVE EYES! President Donald J. Trump Pete Hegseth See my reporting on this topic below ⬇️

Laura Loomer

418,806 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten