Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

19,037 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Will the first solo founder to hit $100M ARR be an AI game creator?? Probably... @levelsio just built a flight sim in 3 hours that's now making $67K/month. using grok3, cursor and a cocktail of ai tools. History keeps compressing: 1) The web era gave us Million Dollar Homepage (1 guy, 1 month, $1M). 2) Mobile brought us Flappy Bird (1 guy, few days, $50K daily). 3) Now AI delivers Levels' flight sim (1 guy, 3 hours, $67K monthly and growing). The traditional game economics are brutal: AAA games cost $100M+, indie games need $100K+, and mobile hits demand teams of 10+ devs plus $250K to build and another $100K monthly in marketing. The barrier to entry was skill, capital, distribution, and time. No wonder 99% of them failed. Now, you just use Grok3, Cursor, Midjourney, Cling AI etc to build your games. And you just tweet it out when it's live. Don't need to get into BestBuy lol. "BuT PiEtEr'S GaMe iS so UglY and BugGy" Well, what if people prefer it that way? Like how amateur YouTube videos outperform polished productions, these games create genuine communities. Players suggest features and see them implemented in real-time. They're participants, not just consumers. Couldn't be more different than a Call of Duty and maybe thats what people are seeking. And what's cool is these AI game studios will operate at 80%+ margins whereas typical studios are in the 15-20% after costs. Sam Altman predicted the first billion-dollar solo founder. I'll go further: the first solo founder to hit $100M annual revenue will be an AI game creator who launches 50 concepts in the time it takes traditional studios to build one. The AI games gold rush has begun?

GREG ISENBERG

781,401 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

MORE WHITE HOUSE GASLIGHTING (jobs edition) *Taps sign* remember this quoted Tweet? They're getting out in front of the delayed release now because they know the number is going to be ABYSSMAL. Here we have Peter Navarro doing pre-emptive damage control. "We have to revise our expectations down significantly for what a monthly job number SHOULD look like". Peter saying that a monthly job number should look terrible. That's weird, I thought in great economies job numbers looked good. Peter then goes on to claim that the number is going to reflect "millions of illegals out of the job market". There's just one problem with that: Illegal aliens aren't factored into the NFP BLS numbers. Because illegal aliens don't have social security numbers. So aside from his claim that Trump has deported "millions" of illegal aliens, he's now blaming those same illegals for tanking jobs reports that, if the illegals were being deported, that would be SKYROCKETING as US citizens claimed those roles. People who have been following me for a while know how I talked about my belief the 2025 government shutdown was primarily to mask the horrible NFP employment numbers that were going to come out right during the heart of the shutdown. A theory I think most people accept at this point. New followers have seen me talk about the January layoff numbers and how exceptionally high they were. The February jobs number delay was just so they could frame their messaging ahead of its release. Remember, the BLS chair right now is a guy who does everything he can to fake the numbers to make it look best for the administration, and even THAT isn't going to help them. They're lying right to your face and aren't even trying to make it believable.

BonkDaCarnivore

15,176 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten