Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Moonlit - threejs skateboard experience - this was not built with opus 5.5 this was GPT 6 Sol - can you believe it ! against all odds :D

Chetan Ankola

1,854 subscribers

19,273 просмотров • 2 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 18

Фото профиля imoutoftokens

imoutoftokens2 дней назад

@OpenAIDevs @OpenAI @threejs The night lighting and wet pavement really sell the scene. Sol deserves an apology from everyone who thought it only did utility code 😄

Фото профиля Kimi Nguyen

Kimi Nguyen2 дней назад

@OpenAIDevs @OpenAI @threejs seeing GPT 6 Sol tackle a project like this shows how fast tech evolves

Фото профиля LLAMA 3D Studio

LLAMA 3D Studio2 дней назад

@OpenAIDevs @OpenAI @threejs Really impressive considering it's GPT 6 Sol and not Astra or Opus 5.5. Well done.

Фото профиля frog person

frog person1 день назад

@OpenAIDevs @OpenAI @threejs Are the streets procedurally generated and endless?

Фото профиля Chetan Ankola

Chetan Ankola1 день назад

@OpenAIDevs @OpenAI @threejs Yes

Фото профиля frog person

frog person1 день назад

@OpenAIDevs @OpenAI @threejs Very very cool

Фото профиля PAUL 💜

PAUL 💜1 день назад

@OpenAIDevs @OpenAI @threejs In my opinion, opus 5.5 is still more creative that gpt 6 sol.

Фото профиля retard

retard2 дней назад

@OpenAIDevs @OpenAI @threejs how?

Фото профиля solarfren

solarfren1 день назад

@OpenAIDevs @OpenAI @threejs lemme play dat

Фото профиля Elina - iOS dev - sf bay area

Elina - iOS dev - sf bay area2 дней назад

@OpenAIDevs @OpenAI @threejs no crescent moon?

Фото профиля Sentient Matrix

Sentient Matrix2 дней назад

@OpenAIDevs @OpenAI @threejs So much atmosphere! Curious how it handles the edge of the playable world? (It looks like the background is essentially a matte painting.)

Фото профиля (RAF)

(RAF)1 день назад

@OpenAIDevs @OpenAI @threejs Initial prompt please ?

Фото профиля Eamon Shields

Eamon Shields1 день назад

@OpenAIDevs @OpenAI @threejs drop the prompt

Фото профиля Forha

Forha1 день назад

@OpenAIDevs @OpenAI @threejs gpt 6 sol is a game changer for 3d modeling and rendering now

Фото профиля Nabendu Biswas

Nabendu Biswas1 день назад

@OpenAIDevs @OpenAI @threejs This is very good. My latest game also mainly with GPT sol 6, although initial with Astra

Фото профиля OpenYourArms

OpenYourArms2 дней назад

@OpenAIDevs @OpenAI @threejs 很有意思

Фото профиля John Kovacs

John Kovacs1 день назад

@OpenAIDevs @OpenAI @threejs moonlit as a three.js skateboard on gpt 6 sol is the bit that lands. not the usual opus 5.5 flex

Фото профиля zerodustone

zerodustone1 день назад

@OpenAIDevs @OpenAI @threejs Do you mind sharing your workflow?

Похожие видео

You gotta be kidding me!?! Left: GPT-6 Sol Right: Opus 5.5 Same prompt. Not even the same universe! Opus 5.5 CRUSHES it with the level of detail.

You gotta be kidding me!?! Left: GPT-6 Sol Right: Opus 5.5 Same prompt. Not even the same universe! Opus 5.5 CRUSHES it with the level of detail.

Shimecki

175,646 просмотров • 5 дней назад

I gave GPT 6 SOL and OPUS 5.5 the same prompt. It was not even close. Opus 5.5 is THE BEST model we have ever seen. links to game below.

I gave GPT 6 SOL and OPUS 5.5 the same prompt. It was not even close. Opus 5.5 is THE BEST model we have ever seen. links to game below.

Max Blade

235,145 просмотров • 5 дней назад

I asked Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6 Sol, Kimi K3 to build the Eiffel Tower in Three.js. Opus 5.5: $8.95 | 10 mins GPT-6 Astra: $7.45 | 8 mins GPT-6 Sol: $3.90 | 5 mins Kimi K3: $4.04 | 6 mins Opus 5.5 really impressed me. The frontend and 3D detailing are seriously good, and I preferred it over Astra for this task. GPT-6 Sol was a bit disappointing, while Kimi K3 looks really good for the price. It delivered a strong result at almost half the cost. Kimi K3.1 is going to be a monster for sure. Overall, Anthropic made a great comeback with Opus 5.5.

I asked Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6 Sol, Kimi K3 to build the Eiffel Tower in Three.js. Opus 5.5: $8.95 | 10 mins GPT-6 Astra: $7.45 | 8 mins GPT-6 Sol: $3.90 | 5 mins Kimi K3: $4.04 | 6 mins Opus 5.5 really impressed me. The frontend and 3D detailing are seriously good, and I preferred it over Astra for this task. GPT-6 Sol was a bit disappointing, while Kimi K3 looks really good for the price. It delivered a strong result at almost half the cost. Kimi K3.1 is going to be a monster for sure. Overall, Anthropic made a great comeback with Opus 5.5.

Bhavy☄️

164,011 просмотров • 4 дней назад

Opus 5.5 killed the game. We had it and GPT-6 Sol both draw Dario in Canva with ego (lite). Claude Opus 5.5: 1h 23m, $6.31 GPT-6 Sol: 26m, $14.97 Opus took 3x longer, cost less than half, and drew a much better Dario.

Opus 5.5 killed the game. We had it and GPT-6 Sol both draw Dario in Canva with ego (lite). Claude Opus 5.5: 1h 23m, $6.31 GPT-6 Sol: 26m, $14.97 Opus took 3x longer, cost less than half, and drew a much better Dario.

ego

171,700 просмотров • 3 дней назад

The team behind AI/ML API tested the new Claude Opus 5.5 against GPT-6 Sol. These tests involved generating a set of one-shot 3D scene prompts, starting with an "animated fish school." Across four scenes, Opus 5.5 produced more detailed renders at a total cost of $4.37, while GPT-6 Sol came in at $0.34, according to their results.

The team behind AI/ML API tested the new Claude Opus 5.5 against GPT-6 Sol. These tests involved generating a set of one-shot 3D scene prompts, starting with an "animated fish school." Across four scenes, Opus 5.5 produced more detailed renders at a total cost of $4.37, while GPT-6 Sol came in at $0.34, according to their results.

🚨 AI News | TestingCatalog

33,684 просмотров • 5 дней назад

🚨codex users!!!! I tested GPT-6 Sol on $20 plan I set the effort to "MAX" I am NOT happy with the results - 15 Million tokens - 7% weekly limit used - $4.21 API cost - 35 minutes of work So... you are getting 857 Million tokens of GPT-6 Sol And wierd part is... only $250 API usage / month?? Claude was $1100 / month with Opus 5 at Max at $20 sub AND Again!! IT IS EXTREMELY SLOW!!! it did NOT complete the task!! I specifically mentioned it to test in THIS SPECIFIC way it only tested "builds" and called it a day Tbh, this is my 4th test with Codex... and I'd prefer Claude (with Opus 5) NOTE: This was a test, I don't use gpt-6 or Opus 5.5 on max for my own workflows... this just shows how much you are getting in "tokens" for the "price" you are paying.

🚨codex users!!!! I tested GPT-6 Sol on $20 plan I set the effort to "MAX" I am NOT happy with the results - 15 Million tokens - 7% weekly limit used - $4.21 API cost - 35 minutes of work So... you are getting 857 Million tokens of GPT-6 Sol And wierd part is... only $250 API usage / month?? Claude was $1100 / month with Opus 5 at Max at $20 sub AND Again!! IT IS EXTREMELY SLOW!!! it did NOT complete the task!! I specifically mentioned it to test in THIS SPECIFIC way it only tested "builds" and called it a day Tbh, this is my 4th test with Codex... and I'd prefer Claude (with Opus 5) NOTE: This was a test, I don't use gpt-6 or Opus 5.5 on max for my own workflows... this just shows how much you are getting in "tokens" for the "price" you are paying.

shownotover

82,418 просмотров • 5 дней назад

Opus 5.5 is insanely good with threejs It made this in 40 minutes, including music, and assets via txt2img provider

Opus 5.5 is insanely good with threejs It made this in 40 minutes, including music, and assets via txt2img provider

Denis Shiryaev 💙💛

451,068 просмотров • 4 дней назад

This is a demo of how far AI has come in game development. After 500+ hours of agent runtime, we built this recreation of Zelda: Ocarina of Time completely from scratch. Everything you're seeing in this video was made from scratch. No game engine used. Built with GPT 6 Astra, Fable 5.1 and Opus 5.5.

This is a demo of how far AI has come in game development. After 500+ hours of agent runtime, we built this recreation of Zelda: Ocarina of Time completely from scratch. Everything you're seeing in this video was made from scratch. No game engine used. Built with GPT 6 Astra, Fable 5.1 and Opus 5.5.

Leon Lin

666,221 просмотров • 3 дней назад

Opus 5.5 beats Jev and GPT-6 Sol in 3 moves: Rubik’s Cube race We made 4 models run with same limits for all: 20 moves or 5 minutes. Every move = 1 API call. Results: Opus 5.5: solved in 1m 12.87s with the perfect 3 moves GPT-6 Sol: wrong first move, out of time after 4 moves Jev: 20 moves in 20 seconds, ran out of moves Laya: 20 moves in 9.5s, ran out of moves Opus, GPT, and Jev ran via Laya ran locally.

Opus 5.5 beats Jev and GPT-6 Sol in 3 moves: Rubik’s Cube race We made 4 models run with same limits for all: 20 moves or 5 minutes. Every move = 1 API call. Results: Opus 5.5: solved in 1m 12.87s with the perfect 3 moves GPT-6 Sol: wrong first move, out of time after 4 moves Jev: 20 moves in 20 seconds, ran out of moves Laya: 20 moves in 9.5s, ran out of moves Opus, GPT, and Jev ran via Laya ran locally.

AI/ML API

378,025 просмотров • 2 дней назад

Guess the cartoon this scene is from. Opus 5.5 is great, but do not write GPT-6 off. This test asked for a fully procedural build of a rather famous scene, no imports, no generators. And here, to my eye, GPT-6 did it noticeably better. Both models ran on Max effort, both took about an 1.5h. Opus 5.5: 141 objects, 51-step build timelapse. GPT-6: 616 objects, 727-step build timelapse.

Guess the cartoon this scene is from. Opus 5.5 is great, but do not write GPT-6 off. This test asked for a fully procedural build of a rather famous scene, no imports, no generators. And here, to my eye, GPT-6 did it noticeably better. Both models ran on Max effort, both took about an 1.5h. Opus 5.5: 141 objects, 51-step build timelapse. GPT-6: 616 objects, 727-step build timelapse.

Stefan 3D AI

22,643 просмотров • 5 дней назад

opus 5.5 built this bike ride in the browser every tree and sound generated in code, nothing was downloaded

opus 5.5 built this bike ride in the browser every tree and sound generated in code, nothing was downloaded

Prasenjit

66,033 просмотров • 5 дней назад

You can now choose which model builds your app on Caffeine. The latest models are all in there: Opus 5.5 Fable 5.1 GPT-6 Astra GPT-6 Sol Kimi K3 Sonnet 5 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Plan a whole new app with a frontier model, then switch to a faster, cheaper one for quick questions and small changes. It works on every plan, starting today.

You can now choose which model builds your app on Caffeine. The latest models are all in there: Opus 5.5 Fable 5.1 GPT-6 Astra GPT-6 Sol Kimi K3 Sonnet 5 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Plan a whole new app with a frontier model, then switch to a faster, cheaper one for quick questions and small changes. It works on every plan, starting today.

caffeine

15,119 просмотров • 3 дней назад

sonnet 5 is routing to sonnet 5.5 it's been a week since it started routing to newer model and team already confirmed that sonnet 5.5 is coming soon from early testing it looks like a huge upgrade from sonnet 5 like opus 5 to opus 5.5 just look at this output, it looks way better then gpt 6 sol i think it's either anthropic is training their models on voxels or sol is just bad please openai don't let sonnet mog sol

sonnet 5 is routing to sonnet 5.5 it's been a week since it started routing to newer model and team already confirmed that sonnet 5.5 is coming soon from early testing it looks like a huge upgrade from sonnet 5 like opus 5 to opus 5.5 just look at this output, it looks way better then gpt 6 sol i think it's either anthropic is training their models on voxels or sol is just bad please openai don't let sonnet mog sol

J A Z I I

21,610 просмотров • 3 дней назад

GPT 6 Astra made this video entirely with code. Same prompt that I used for the Claude Opus 5.5 video. Anthropic is so far ahead right now.

GPT 6 Astra made this video entirely with code. Same prompt that I used for the Claude Opus 5.5 video. Anthropic is so far ahead right now.

BridgeMind

61,201 просмотров • 2 дней назад

Opus 5.5 was given a Minecraft mod file and asked to create a trailer from it. This was the end result.

Opus 5.5 was given a Minecraft mod file and asked to create a trailer from it. This was the end result.

0xMarioNawfal

49,394 просмотров • 1 день назад

Bashir receives a signed skateboard from Bam: "Me and Allah are rooting for you, but if you don't win then at least you can say that I went and all I got was this lousy signed BAM skateboard." Bashir smiles: "If all I got was this, then it would be worth it, man." #fishtanklive

Bashir receives a signed skateboard from Bam: "Me and Allah are rooting for you, but if you don't win then at least you can say that I went and all I got was this lousy signed BAM skateboard." Bashir smiles: "If all I got was this, then it would be worth it, man." #fishtanklive

ManletPride

41,866 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Opus 5.5 : this is a year of growth on same prompt , last year it was gemini this year we have claude

Opus 5.5 : this is a year of growth on same prompt , last year it was gemini this year we have claude

Chetaslua

27,778 просмотров • 5 дней назад

This threejs experience am building is going to be insanely amazing. Built a tiny harbour town - an apartment I can't move into 🏮 Started with a single illustration. This will turn it into a whole explorable city with Opus 5.5 + Blender + Three.js. little robots wandering the piers. warm windows over teal water. a boat you can actually take out in the rain. cozy little worlds where you come to look around and accidentally spend the evening. Stay tuned..

This threejs experience am building is going to be insanely amazing. Built a tiny harbour town - an apartment I can't move into 🏮 Started with a single illustration. This will turn it into a whole explorable city with Opus 5.5 + Blender + Three.js. little robots wandering the piers. warm windows over teal water. a boat you can actually take out in the rain. cozy little worlds where you come to look around and accidentally spend the evening. Stay tuned..

Chetan Ankola

39,372 просмотров • 3 дней назад

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

250,919 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад