Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Most AI coding tools focus on helping one developer work faster. Reason is taking a different approach. The idea of a multiplayer coding agent is interesting because software development rarely happens in isolation. Reason lets AI agents and humans work together, split tasks, debug issues and verify solutions instead...

10,892 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

34 Kommentare

Profilbild von Kiều B2
Kiều B2vor 3 Tagen

@reasonmachines Collaborative AI coding will enhance development efficiency

Profilbild von useetek
useetekvor 3 Tagen

@reasonmachines There's a good reason to look at this before forming a strong opinion.

Profilbild von Sapient
Sapientvor 3 Tagen

@reasonmachines ai is def the future

Profilbild von Senius
Seniusvor 3 Tagen

@reasonmachines A lot depends on how we see things

Profilbild von 🚢Behrooz Alinezhad
🚢Behrooz Alinezhadvor 3 Tagen

@reasonmachines Collaborative AI agents could make coding much more efficient.

Profilbild von Lingg
Linggvor 3 Tagen

@reasonmachines Collaborative coding agents will redefine how developers work

Profilbild von Kim Vault
Kim Vaultvor 3 Tagen

@reasonmachines how many people are on the reasonmachines team

Profilbild von Pham Toi
Pham Toivor 3 Tagen

@reasonmachines AI tools improve collaboration together.

Profilbild von dens club
dens clubvor 3 Tagen

@reasonmachines same burden in every product means the layer missed

Profilbild von MUBBY
MUBBYvor 3 Tagen

@reasonmachines I like this post because there is something to learn from it

Profilbild von Arjantit
Arjantitvor 3 Tagen

@reasonmachines 👀

Profilbild von HANNAH🔥KRYPT
HANNAH🔥KRYPTvor 3 Tagen

@reasonmachines reasonmachines is building multiplayer coding agents where humans + AIs collaborate in parallel with shared context to split, debug and verify work, not just autocomplete faster.

Profilbild von Mookie
Mookievor 3 Tagen

@reasonmachines You’re so right brother

Profilbild von P.Linh♡
P.Linh♡vor 3 Tagen

@reasonmachines Parallel collaboration truly speeds up development.

Profilbild von Arix
Arixvor 3 Tagen

@reasonmachines Different approach makes it batter

Profilbild von sasak
sasakvor 3 Tagen

@reasonmachines multiplayer agents beat a single agent for debugging issues

Profilbild von Fawaz 🪶
Fawaz 🪶vor 3 Tagen

@reasonmachines Multiplayer coding could be a big shift if agents can actually share context and verify each other’s work

Profilbild von Maureen Archibong | 0% trading fee on coinup
Maureen Archibong | 0% trading fee on coinupvor 3 Tagen

@reasonmachines Having multiple agents work on different parts of a project could save a lot of time, especially when debugging gets messy. 👀

Profilbild von Duck Daily 🦆
Duck Daily 🦆vor 3 Tagen

@reasonmachines reasonmachines shows multiplayer coding could speed up projects dramatically

Profilbild von Northstar | Web3 🌊
Northstar | Web3 🌊vor 3 Tagen

@reasonmachines Shared context across sessions could still be out of date if a developer changes a dependency after a session ends. In that case, the AI might generate code that compiles locally but fails on the CI server due to the mismatched version.

Profilbild von Macro Bombastic
Macro Bombasticvor 3 Tagen

@reasonmachines multiplayer agents make sense tbh, solo coding is kinda overrated

Profilbild von Đường Phát
Đường Phátvor 3 Tagen

@reasonmachines team coding with reasonmachines boosts productivity and reduces bugs

Profilbild von 𝐁𝐞𝐧𝐳 
𝐁𝐞𝐧𝐳 vor 3 Tagen

@reasonmachines this how teams really move together

Profilbild von Faisal
Faisalvor 3 Tagen

@reasonmachines Multiplayer makes way more sense than another solo copilot. The messy part of real projects is the handoff between people, not the typing speed

Profilbild von Loc Capital
Loc Capitalvor 3 Tagen

@reasonmachines but multiple agents could actually slow down debugging

Profilbild von 𝗘𝗹𝗹𝗮
𝗘𝗹𝗹𝗮vor 3 Tagen

@reasonmachines The real breakthrough is AI agents collaborating, not just coding faster.

Profilbild von Bryan Quartz
Bryan Quartzvor 3 Tagen

@reasonmachines would you trust it on prod code?

Profilbild von ABBA
ABBAvor 3 Tagen

@reasonmachines Clear structure supports better understanding

Profilbild von Xavi
Xavivor 3 Tagen

@reasonmachines multiplayer agents are cool, but shared context is the hard part

Profilbild von Shuvo
Shuvovor 3 Tagen

@reasonmachines This approach could change development teamwork

Profilbild von Zaric
Zaricvor 3 Tagen

@reasonmachines love the multiplayer angle, feels way more real-world

Profilbild von Duc Crypto
Duc Cryptovor 3 Tagen

@reasonmachines maybe still too dependent on one agent despite multiplayer claim

Profilbild von Lenda Noire
Lenda Noirevor 3 Tagen

@reasonmachines this team collaboration vibe feels right. can’t wait to see how it changes the game for devs working together long distance

Profilbild von Tazman
Tazmanvor 3 Tagen

@reasonmachines multiplayer coding agents splitting tasks beats single agent bottlenecks every time

Ähnliche Videos

We're only year 3 of a decade (if not multi-decades) long transformation of work. 3 years ago we bet on building an horizontal platform for work with agents, a chance to invent a new operating system for companies, from scratch, with AI as a fundamental premise. Many people considered us crazy for going after that, praising verticalized AI products as the winning strategy. But here's the thing: the time horizon of tasks successfully handled by agents has been predictively increasing form minutes to hours and will in all likelihood reach the equivalent of days and weeks of human work equivalent in the coming quarters. This is were verticalized and/or single-player AI falls short. Single-player tools, one person, one agent, confined to your machine is the wrong architecture for what's coming. We're shifting from using AI to produce things, to managing fleets of agents that do the producing. 3 years ago I wrote[1]: "ChatGPT is the Pong of LLMs. [...] Imagine, one day we'll get the DOOM, Civ, Red Alert, and Counter Strike of LLMs. Let alone multiplayer modes." Weeks long tasks in companies are inherently collaborative and mechanically spanning multiple teams. The new bottleneck in harnessing agents within organizations is coordination: multiple humans and multiple agents need to work together, with shared context, shared tools, shared goals. Agents that can hand work off to other agents or surface decisions to the right person at the right time. Humans who can review, steer, and step in without losing the thread. Teams that can run parallel workstreams and actually stay aligned. This is Multiplayer AI, and that's what we've been building at Dust. Across Datadog, Clay, Persona, 1Password, Doctolib and 3,000+ organizations globally, we've watched teams figure out what this looks like in practice. 300,000+ agents deployed. 70% weekly active. 240%+ NRR. Today we're announcing a $40M Series B with Abstract, Sequoia, Snowflake, and Datadog to accelerate our vision. Designing the right interfaces for multiplayer AI is the next frontier. Join us to redefine work by defining multiplayer AI.

Stanislas Polu

3,206,770 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Most AI coding setups right now look something like this: one agent in a terminal, another in a browser tab, a chat window somewhere else, and you in the middle copy-pasting diffs like a very tired air traffic controller. JetBrains just launched something aimed right at that mess. It's called JetBrains Air, and it lives inside their IDEs. The short version: Air lets you direct multiple coding agents, run their tasks in parallel, and review their work without ever leaving your IDE. Here's what stood out to me: 👇 1. You pick the agents. Air isn't tied to a single agent or provider. You can use the ones you already like. That matters more than it sounds, because the "best" coding agent changes every few months, and nobody wants to rebuild their whole workflow each time. 2. Parallel work without losing track. You can run several agent sessions at once, even across different projects. Air shows you where your attention is needed, so you're not hopping between tabs to find out which agent is stuck. 3. You stay in control. You can follow what each agent is doing, give it input, inspect the changes, and review the output before accepting anything. Nothing lands in your codebase just because an agent felt confident. 4. The agents get IDE smarts too. This is the part I find most interesting. JetBrains IDEs already have great code navigation, refactoring, testing, and debugging. With Air, both you and your agents work with that context. So the agents aren't guessing blind inside a chat box, and when something needs a human, the real tools are right there. The bigger idea here is that agents become part of your development workflow instead of a separate chat you keep switching to. There's also a nice bonus. For a limited time, JetBrains is offering Junie Lite for free (fair use applies). It's their own coding agent paired with a highly efficient model. It isn't pitched as a frontier-level agent. Think of it as a solid, free baseline for trying out Air and running everyday tasks. Air works in any JetBrains IDE and is in early access right now. If you write code with agents, give it a try: #ad

Mushfiq Sajib

40,469 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen

Mark Zuckerberg says the future of coding is closer than we think: AI agents inside Meta are being built not as generic developer tools, but to push Llama research forward — fully integrated into their workflow. He predicts that within 12–18 months, most of the code for these efforts could be written by AI itself — not simple autocomplete, but systems that take goals, run tests, fix bugs, improve performance, and even write higher-quality code than many skilled engineers. The real takeaway? This is only one part of a massive AI landscape, and no single company will dominate it all. Meta is building its own internal agents designed specifically to advance Llama research — deeply connected to their toolchain rather than built for enterprise customers. He expects that within the next year to year-and-a-half, AI will be writing most of the code in these projects, going far beyond autocomplete — understanding goals, running experiments, finding issues, and continuously improving systems. And according to him, this shift will become a core driver of how AI itself evolves. Meta is investing heavily in coding and research agents deeply integrated into their own systems, focused on advancing Llama rather than building broad enterprise tools. He expects AI will soon move beyond autocomplete to fully goal-driven coding — testing, debugging, improving, and producing high-quality results. But in his view, the AI revolution is too big for any single winner — multiple players and approaches will shape the future.

Ian Miles Cheong

20,561 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten