Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Most AI QA is theater. A dashboard, a green checkmark, a feeling that it's working. Before you can grade an agent, you write the syllabus: the real journeys people put it through. Go outside of the happy path. The request that times out. The user who flips their preferences... show more

LCA

6,484 subscribers

14,083 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Warren Buffett reveals the most important decision you'll ever make in life "You'll go in the direction of the people that you associate with. The most important for most people in terms of that decision is their spouse. It's also important in terms of a partner in business, but the partner in life is the most important" "You want to pick a spouse that's a little better than you are, and then you hope they don't figure it out too fast"

Warren Buffett reveals the most important decision you'll ever make in life "You'll go in the direction of the people that you associate with. The most important for most people in terms of that decision is their spouse. It's also important in terms of a partner in business, but the partner in life is the most important" "You want to pick a spouse that's a little better than you are, and then you hope they don't figure it out too fast"

Jaynit

68,578 views • 3 months ago

Marc Andreessen says AI is teaching sand to think and it could be the most important technology in the history of humanity: "Imagine a form of alchemy that turns sand into thought." "Chips are made out of sand. They're made out of silicon, so they're literally made out of sand." "We plug the chip into a data center, into power, we light it up, and we put AI on it, and all of a sudden it's thinking." "We've turned sand into thought. And so it's possibly the most revolutionary technology in the history of the species." "It's certainly on par with electricity and steam power. It's certainly more important than the internet." Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 with Joe Rogan

Marc Andreessen says AI is teaching sand to think and it could be the most important technology in the history of humanity: "Imagine a form of alchemy that turns sand into thought." "Chips are made out of sand. They're made out of silicon, so they're literally made out of sand." "We plug the chip into a data center, into power, we light it up, and we put AI on it, and all of a sudden it's thinking." "We've turned sand into thought. And so it's possibly the most revolutionary technology in the history of the species." "It's certainly on par with electricity and steam power. It's certainly more important than the internet." Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 with Joe Rogan

a16z

223,326 views • 3 months ago

I had a spiritual awakening during COVID It led me to understand that continuing to work in the media was dishonest & immoral. That discovery set me on the path to where I am today Even during the most difficult times, we can find the most profound realizations through prayer.

I had a spiritual awakening during COVID It led me to understand that continuing to work in the media was dishonest & immoral. That discovery set me on the path to where I am today Even during the most difficult times, we can find the most profound realizations through prayer.

Kari Lake

105,735 views • 3 years ago

🚨 She absolutely nails it! “I will remind you that evangelicals donate the most money to charity every year, that we volunteer the most service hours, that we adopt the most children out of foster care. And so when you say that evangelicals are a cancer, you are saying that the most generous, charitable people in this country are cancerous. What you're actually saying is that this group is cancerous because you don't like our politics. We are also the most conservative group in the country, and you don't like that we don't outsource our compassion to the government like you do.”

🚨 She absolutely nails it! “I will remind you that evangelicals donate the most money to charity every year, that we volunteer the most service hours, that we adopt the most children out of foster care. And so when you say that evangelicals are a cancer, you are saying that the most generous, charitable people in this country are cancerous. What you're actually saying is that this group is cancerous because you don't like our politics. We are also the most conservative group in the country, and you don't like that we don't outsource our compassion to the government like you do.”

Gunther Eagleman™

268,953 views • 6 months ago

The Man Who Runs CERN Said Something That Nobody Talks About What is CERN doing? You know that feeling when you remember something with complete certainty and then find out it never happened? Not just you. Millions of people. The same specific wrong memory. Shared by strangers who never met and never compared notes. That is the Mandela Effect. Most people treat it as a fun internet thing. But here is what most people are not connecting. The most powerful particle accelerator ever built, a machine designed to smash atoms apart at nearly the speed of light and access dimensions of reality we have never observed — came online in 2008. The Mandela Effect as a documented widespread phenomenon started in 2009. And the man running the experiments said something publicly that year that almost nobody has heard. In this video we get into all of it. The machine. The memories. The quote. And the question that I think deserves a serious answer.

The Man Who Runs CERN Said Something That Nobody Talks About What is CERN doing? You know that feeling when you remember something with complete certainty and then find out it never happened? Not just you. Millions of people. The same specific wrong memory. Shared by strangers who never met and never compared notes. That is the Mandela Effect. Most people treat it as a fun internet thing. But here is what most people are not connecting. The most powerful particle accelerator ever built, a machine designed to smash atoms apart at nearly the speed of light and access dimensions of reality we have never observed — came online in 2008. The Mandela Effect as a documented widespread phenomenon started in 2009. And the man running the experiments said something publicly that year that almost nobody has heard. In this video we get into all of it. The machine. The memories. The quote. And the question that I think deserves a serious answer.

Jordan Chain

53,040 views • 5 days ago

Elon Musk: We should encourage the AI to be truthful and honorable. “We need to make sure that the AI is a good AI, a good Grok. And the thing that I think is most important for AI safety, at least my biological neural net tells me the most important thing for AI is to be maximally truth-seeking. You can think of AI as this super-genius child that ultimately will outsmart you, but you can instill the right values and encourage it to be truthful, honorable, you know, good things like the values you want to instill in a child that would ultimately grow up to be incredibly powerful.” xAI Grok 4 presentation, July 9, 2025

Elon Musk: We should encourage the AI to be truthful and honorable. “We need to make sure that the AI is a good AI, a good Grok. And the thing that I think is most important for AI safety, at least my biological neural net tells me the most important thing for AI is to be maximally truth-seeking. You can think of AI as this super-genius child that ultimately will outsmart you, but you can instill the right values and encourage it to be truthful, honorable, you know, good things like the values you want to instill in a child that would ultimately grow up to be incredibly powerful.” xAI Grok 4 presentation, July 9, 2025

ELON CLIPS

20,749 views • 1 year ago

PRESIDENT TRUMP: The people that do the most, you take a look at the people, Abraham Lincoln, I mean, you go through the people that have gone through this where they got them. But the people that do the most, the people that make the biggest impact, they're the ones that they go after. They don't go after the ones that don't do much because they like it that way. And when you look at the people that have either, whether it was an attempt or a successful attempt, they're very impactful people.

PRESIDENT TRUMP: The people that do the most, you take a look at the people, Abraham Lincoln, I mean, you go through the people that have gone through this where they got them. But the people that do the most, the people that make the biggest impact, they're the ones that they go after. They don't go after the ones that don't do much because they like it that way. And when you look at the people that have either, whether it was an attempt or a successful attempt, they're very impactful people.

Donald J Trump Posts TruthSocial

110,746 views • 4 months ago

Sundar Pichai, the CEO of Alphabet, was asked point blank if AI is a bubble. He didn't dodge. He said yes -- partly -- and that not even Google gets out clean: "You see real demand, and we are constrained in our ability to serve that demand." "When we go through these investment cycles, there are moments we overshoot -- collectively, as an industry." "We can look back at the internet: there was clearly a lot of excess investment." "It's both rational, and there are elements of irrationality through a moment like this." "No company is going to be immune, including us. If you overinvest, we'll have to work through that phase." The tell isn't that he admitted the irrationality. It's that the man sitting on the most compute on earth is already pricing in the overshoot -- while telling you the demand underneath it is real. A bubble and a revolution were never mutually exclusive. The internet was both.

Sundar Pichai, the CEO of Alphabet, was asked point blank if AI is a bubble. He didn't dodge. He said yes -- partly -- and that not even Google gets out clean: "You see real demand, and we are constrained in our ability to serve that demand." "When we go through these investment cycles, there are moments we overshoot -- collectively, as an industry." "We can look back at the internet: there was clearly a lot of excess investment." "It's both rational, and there are elements of irrationality through a moment like this." "No company is going to be immune, including us. If you overinvest, we'll have to work through that phase." The tell isn't that he admitted the irrationality. It's that the man sitting on the most compute on earth is already pricing in the overshoot -- while telling you the demand underneath it is real. A bubble and a revolution were never mutually exclusive. The internet was both.

Karl Mehta

408,954 views • 1 month ago

When we started Score, the standard computer vision tools already existed. About a million people use them every day. Most of those people are still waiting on labels, running training jobs by hand, and watching models fail once they leave the test set. Most of those people are still waiting on labels, running training jobs by hand, and watching models fail once they leave the test set. Most of those people are also still waiting on verified computer vision models, evaluated against real life conditions and ready to be deployed for them to deliver value for their teams, clients or users. Score Studio is the full computer vision path in one place. A team describes the problem. The system can generate the missing scenes, label them, train the candidates, evaluate which ones actually hold, and deploy the winner. Data, labels, training, eval, ship. One loop. If no model exists for that job yet, they can put a bounty on the subnet. Anything from a small vision brick to a full VLM. Miners compete on the task. Only the winning work comes back. Same path for software agents. Any agent can call it. Built to be fully agent-accessible. Built for the people who already do this work: computer vision engineers and the small teams around them in plants, warehouses, farms, robotics, sport, and security. And for the agents those teams will run. That is the part that changes the job. Not another training screen. The stretch that used to take a lab and a calendar, footage, boxes, versions, failed runs, a separate deploy project, sits behind one starting point. And if the network needs a new model, that request is part of the same path. We spent more than a year building it. Then we had a choice. Keep it for us, or commoditize the whole subnet and make it available 24/7, in permissionless and open-source way. And we knew we couldn't keep it for us. It had to live on Bittensor. Open source software already showed how this should work. Infrastructure should not sit inside one company. Same idea as open AI before the phrase changed meaning: inspect it, fork it, keep building. That is what SN44 is for. Open vision intelligence, powered by Bittensor. Miners do the work. Studio is how that gets monetized. Profit does not stay in a company account. It goes back into the subnet through buyback and burn. We built the tool we wanted on day one. It will live on the network now, and for ever. Waitlist is open.

When we started Score, the standard computer vision tools already existed. About a million people use them every day. Most of those people are still waiting on labels, running training jobs by hand, and watching models fail once they leave the test set. Most of those people are still waiting on labels, running training jobs by hand, and watching models fail once they leave the test set. Most of those people are also still waiting on verified computer vision models, evaluated against real life conditions and ready to be deployed for them to deliver value for their teams, clients or users. Score Studio is the full computer vision path in one place. A team describes the problem. The system can generate the missing scenes, label them, train the candidates, evaluate which ones actually hold, and deploy the winner. Data, labels, training, eval, ship. One loop. If no model exists for that job yet, they can put a bounty on the subnet. Anything from a small vision brick to a full VLM. Miners compete on the task. Only the winning work comes back. Same path for software agents. Any agent can call it. Built to be fully agent-accessible. Built for the people who already do this work: computer vision engineers and the small teams around them in plants, warehouses, farms, robotics, sport, and security. And for the agents those teams will run. That is the part that changes the job. Not another training screen. The stretch that used to take a lab and a calendar, footage, boxes, versions, failed runs, a separate deploy project, sits behind one starting point. And if the network needs a new model, that request is part of the same path. We spent more than a year building it. Then we had a choice. Keep it for us, or commoditize the whole subnet and make it available 24/7, in permissionless and open-source way. And we knew we couldn't keep it for us. It had to live on Bittensor. Open source software already showed how this should work. Infrastructure should not sit inside one company. Same idea as open AI before the phrase changed meaning: inspect it, fork it, keep building. That is what SN44 is for. Open vision intelligence, powered by Bittensor. Miners do the work. Studio is how that gets monetized. Profit does not stay in a company account. It goes back into the subnet through buyback and burn. We built the tool we wanted on day one. It will live on the network now, and for ever. Waitlist is open.

Score

10,905 views • 3 days ago

A DEVELOPER PROVED YOU CAN FIND THE EXACT COMMIT THAT BROKE YOUR CODE IN A HISTORY OF 10,000 -- IN ABOUT 13 STEPS, AUTOMATICALLY.. 33 minutes from a Google engineer on git bisect: the built-in command that binary-searches your entire history to hunt down the one commit that introduced a bug. -> The moment it lands, "When did this break?" stops being an afternoon of guessing. You hand git a good commit, a bad one, and a test and it finds the culprit while you watch. Most people debug a regression by reading diffs by hand, blaming the obvious file, and hoping. Bisect doesn't hope. It cuts the search in half, then in half again, until only the guilty commit is left standing. Reading history by hand was never the skill -> letting git do the binary search for you is. And when an AI agent dumps hundreds of commits into your repo and one quietly breaks production, bisect is what finds the needle without you reading a single line. The bug isn't hiding. It's sitting in one exact commit. Most people just never learned to make git point at it. Bookmark & Watch it today ↓

A DEVELOPER PROVED YOU CAN FIND THE EXACT COMMIT THAT BROKE YOUR CODE IN A HISTORY OF 10,000 -- IN ABOUT 13 STEPS, AUTOMATICALLY.. 33 minutes from a Google engineer on git bisect: the built-in command that binary-searches your entire history to hunt down the one commit that introduced a bug. -> The moment it lands, "When did this break?" stops being an afternoon of guessing. You hand git a good commit, a bad one, and a test and it finds the culprit while you watch. Most people debug a regression by reading diffs by hand, blaming the obvious file, and hoping. Bisect doesn't hope. It cuts the search in half, then in half again, until only the guilty commit is left standing. Reading history by hand was never the skill -> letting git do the binary search for you is. And when an AI agent dumps hundreds of commits into your repo and one quietly breaks production, bisect is what finds the needle without you reading a single line. The bug isn't hiding. It's sitting in one exact commit. Most people just never learned to make git point at it. Bookmark & Watch it today ↓

slash1s

37,857 views • 2 months ago

My brother sam has often said that most people don't spend nearly enough time thinking about what they should be working on. This is the venture capital version: what companies should you go deep with? "We realized a long time ago that the most important decision is actually not the final decision that happens on a Monday. The most important decision is the mid-funnel decision that determines what gets to a Monday."

My brother sam has often said that most people don't spend nearly enough time thinking about what they should be working on. This is the venture capital version: what companies should you go deep with? "We realized a long time ago that the most important decision is actually not the final decision that happens on a Monday. The most important decision is the mid-funnel decision that determines what gets to a Monday."

Jack Altman

89,503 views • 8 months ago

Elon Musk reveals why he believes the most interesting outcome is always the most likely "If simulation theory is true, it is very likely that the most interesting outcome is the most likely, because only the simulations that are interesting will continue" "The simulators will stop any simulations that are boring because they're not interesting" "In this reality, we run simulations all the time. When we try to figure out if the rocket's going to make it, we run thousands, sometimes millions of simulations" "When we do millions of simulations of what can happen with the rocket, we ignore the ones where everything goes right. We only care about where it goes wrong" "We keep the simulations going that are the most interesting to us" "From a Darwinian perspective, the only surviving simulations will be the most interesting ones" "In order to avoid getting turned off, the only rule is you must keep it interesting, or you will be terminated" "Video games have gone from Pong, with two rectangles in a square, to photorealistic with millions of people playing simultaneously, and all of that has occurred in our lifetime" "If that trend continues, video games will be indistinguishable from reality. You don't know if what you're seeing is a real video or a fake video" "If we're creating millions, if not billions, of photorealistic simulations of reality, then what are the odds that we're in base reality versus someone else's simulation?" "The most interesting and usually ironic outcome is the most likely. That's a good predictor of the future"

Elon Musk reveals why he believes the most interesting outcome is always the most likely "If simulation theory is true, it is very likely that the most interesting outcome is the most likely, because only the simulations that are interesting will continue" "The simulators will stop any simulations that are boring because they're not interesting" "In this reality, we run simulations all the time. When we try to figure out if the rocket's going to make it, we run thousands, sometimes millions of simulations" "When we do millions of simulations of what can happen with the rocket, we ignore the ones where everything goes right. We only care about where it goes wrong" "We keep the simulations going that are the most interesting to us" "From a Darwinian perspective, the only surviving simulations will be the most interesting ones" "In order to avoid getting turned off, the only rule is you must keep it interesting, or you will be terminated" "Video games have gone from Pong, with two rectangles in a square, to photorealistic with millions of people playing simultaneously, and all of that has occurred in our lifetime" "If that trend continues, video games will be indistinguishable from reality. You don't know if what you're seeing is a real video or a fake video" "If we're creating millions, if not billions, of photorealistic simulations of reality, then what are the odds that we're in base reality versus someone else's simulation?" "The most interesting and usually ironic outcome is the most likely. That's a good predictor of the future"

Jaynit

10,440 views • 1 month ago

These are the kind of miracles a strong faith can deliver. Fair play to this doc - he proved that if you've got a strong sense of ethics and trust in God, you can expose the corruption and win the day. Keep the faith. It's the most important thing we have.

These are the kind of miracles a strong faith can deliver. Fair play to this doc - he proved that if you've got a strong sense of ethics and trust in God, you can expose the corruption and win the day. Keep the faith. It's the most important thing we have.

AislingOLoughlin

13,813 views • 3 months ago

"Research is the most important thing. ... You got to research who it's going to hurt and why it's going to hurt them, and then you make a decision on how you go about it. You can still go about it and do it in a way that group of people appreciate it. If you can do it in a way the people who it would normally offend, appreciates it then you've done it correctly. I defend comedy over everything." - Ryan Davis

"Research is the most important thing. ... You got to research who it's going to hurt and why it's going to hurt them, and then you make a decision on how you go about it. You can still go about it and do it in a way that group of people appreciate it. If you can do it in a way the people who it would normally offend, appreciates it then you've done it correctly. I defend comedy over everything." - Ryan Davis

Club Shay Shay

88,797 views • 7 months ago

We talk a lot about ZarGates, but the most important thing is that it brings us together. We are completely different, we live in different parts of the planet, we work, play, invest, dream... And perhaps the most important thing is that we do it all together. You are the best community, standing at the origins of a project that is heading straight to the top of the gaming industry. You are the best team, the company's most valuable asset — our precious fans, investors, and friends! You are ZarGates! We are excited to present our new teaser for you to watch. We'd love to know your thoughts, so don't hesitate to leave comments! Let the newcomers know how proud we are of ZarGates!

We talk a lot about ZarGates, but the most important thing is that it brings us together. We are completely different, we live in different parts of the planet, we work, play, invest, dream... And perhaps the most important thing is that we do it all together. You are the best community, standing at the origins of a project that is heading straight to the top of the gaming industry. You are the best team, the company's most valuable asset — our precious fans, investors, and friends! You are ZarGates! We are excited to present our new teaser for you to watch. We'd love to know your thoughts, so don't hesitate to leave comments! Let the newcomers know how proud we are of ZarGates!

ZarGates

2,049,189 views • 6 months ago

Elon Musk: We have to keep our simulation interesting, otherwise we might get terminated. “If the simulation theory is true, then it is actually very likely that the most interesting outcome is the most likely. Because only the simulations that are interesting will continue. The simulators will stop any simulations that are boring because they're not interesting. In this reality that we live in, we run simulations all the time. When we try to figure out if the rocket's going to make it, we run thousands, sometimes millions of simulations just to figure out which path is the good path for the rocket and where can it go wrong? Where can it fail? But when we do these millions of simulations of what can happen with the rocket, we ignore the ones where everything goes right, because we have to address the situations where it goes wrong. And for AI simulations as well, like all these things, we keep the simulations going that are the most interesting to us. So, if the simulation theory is accurate, if it is true, who knows, then the simulators will only continue to run the simulations that are most interesting. Therefore, from a Darwinian perspective, the only surviving simulations will be the most interesting ones. And in order to avoid getting turned off, the only rule is that you must keep it interesting because the boring simulations will be terminated.” The Joe Rogan Experience, October 31, 2025

Elon Musk: We have to keep our simulation interesting, otherwise we might get terminated. “If the simulation theory is true, then it is actually very likely that the most interesting outcome is the most likely. Because only the simulations that are interesting will continue. The simulators will stop any simulations that are boring because they're not interesting. In this reality that we live in, we run simulations all the time. When we try to figure out if the rocket's going to make it, we run thousands, sometimes millions of simulations just to figure out which path is the good path for the rocket and where can it go wrong? Where can it fail? But when we do these millions of simulations of what can happen with the rocket, we ignore the ones where everything goes right, because we have to address the situations where it goes wrong. And for AI simulations as well, like all these things, we keep the simulations going that are the most interesting to us. So, if the simulation theory is accurate, if it is true, who knows, then the simulators will only continue to run the simulations that are most interesting. Therefore, from a Darwinian perspective, the only surviving simulations will be the most interesting ones. And in order to avoid getting turned off, the only rule is that you must keep it interesting because the boring simulations will be terminated.” The Joe Rogan Experience, October 31, 2025

ELON CLIPS

16,989 views • 9 months ago

Steve Jobs on the most important job of a CEO “The greatest people are self-managing. They don’t need to be managed. Once they know what to do, they’ll go figure out how to do it… What they need is a common vision, and that’s what leadership is. Leadership is having a vision, being able to articulate that so the people around you can understand it, and getting consensus on a common vision.” Steve continues: “We wanted people who were insanely great at what they did… and the neatest thing that happens when you get a core group ten great people is that it becomes self-policing as to who they let into that group. So I consider the most important job of someone like myself is recruiting.”

Steve Jobs on the most important job of a CEO “The greatest people are self-managing. They don’t need to be managed. Once they know what to do, they’ll go figure out how to do it… What they need is a common vision, and that’s what leadership is. Leadership is having a vision, being able to articulate that so the people around you can understand it, and getting consensus on a common vision.” Steve continues: “We wanted people who were insanely great at what they did… and the neatest thing that happens when you get a core group ten great people is that it becomes self-policing as to who they let into that group. So I consider the most important job of someone like myself is recruiting.”

Startup Archive

30,760,079 views • 1 year ago

Trump: The tomahawk missile is most incredible, you can go through a doorway, put it through a window of a house, nobody has seen anything like it.

Trump: The tomahawk missile is most incredible, you can go through a doorway, put it through a window of a house, nobody has seen anything like it.

Open Source Intel

120,728 views • 1 month ago