Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Most apps look “done” in the editor. But what actually happens when a real user clicks through the app? I connected my PropertyBazaar project to Replay and ran Replay QA on it. It found a real issue with my newsletter form, no onSubmit handler, no subscription request, and no...

56,106 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

30 Kommentare

Profilbild von Dhairya Karekar
Dhairya Karekarvor 25 Tagen

@replayio I’ll definitely try this on one of my projects.

Profilbild von Krishna Agrawal
Krishna Agrawalvor 25 Tagen

@replayio I’ve been looking for something like this. Will give it a try.

Profilbild von Aastha
Aasthavor 25 Tagen

@replayio This is exactly how QA should work. Finding real issues before users do 🙌

Profilbild von Neha Singh
Neha Singhvor 25 Tagen

@replayio Love this approach. Finding the actual root cause instead of just flagging the bug is super useful.

Profilbild von Ryan Zander
Ryan Zandervor 25 Tagen

@replayio This is the gap between a demo and a product. The UI can look finished while the main action quietly does nothing. Replay-based QA catches what screenshots miss.

Profilbild von Hussain Hashim | Building SundayBack
Hussain Hashim | Building SundayBackvor 25 Tagen

@replayio @BharukaShraddha yeah, it's wild how those things slip through until real users interact. replayio sounds super handy!

Profilbild von Dipanshu Kushwaha
Dipanshu Kushwahavor 24 Tagen

@replayio That's awesome! It's always good to see these kinds of things catch real issues. Glad Replay QA helped you out.

Profilbild von Vaidehi
Vaidehivor 25 Tagen

@replayio This is really useful. Catching these issues before shipping can save a lot of time.

Profilbild von Lyra Irish
Lyra Irishvor 23 Tagen

@replayio Great

Profilbild von Amber shaheryar
Amber shaheryarvor 25 Tagen

@replayio Monumental

Profilbild von Khushi Patil
Khushi Patilvor 25 Tagen

@replayio Sound interesting

Profilbild von Professional_Tech_AI
Professional_Tech_AIvor 25 Tagen

@replayio Impressive share

Profilbild von Zifan Carter
Zifan Cartervor 25 Tagen

@replayio Thanks for share

Profilbild von Raxon Tech
Raxon Techvor 25 Tagen

@replayio Great share

Profilbild von Max
Maxvor 25 Tagen

@replayio This is super cool! It's awesome that Replay QA helps catch bugs before they go live. Great work on this.

Profilbild von David Marco
David Marcovor 25 Tagen

@replayio AW that's

Profilbild von Saif Ai
Saif Aivor 25 Tagen

@replayio Great

Profilbild von Sagar Rahangdale
Sagar Rahangdalevor 25 Tagen

@replayio Great

Profilbild von Miles S.
Miles S.vor 25 Tagen

@replayio i’d 100% miss that newsletter bug in the editor

Profilbild von Sophia Nexus ⭐
Sophia Nexus ⭐vor 24 Tagen

@replayio Amazing post

Profilbild von aizah choudhury
aizah choudhuryvor 24 Tagen

@replayio Great share

Profilbild von John Smith Ai
John Smith Aivor 2 Tagen

@replayio Amazing

Profilbild von Aftahi Rahman
Aftahi Rahmanvor 24 Tagen

@replayio This is super helpful! Finding bugs before they reach users is key. Thanks for sharing your experience with Replay QA.

Profilbild von dhinna ship .ico
dhinna ship .icovor 25 Tagen

@replayio Form rendered without any submit handler attached

Profilbild von MARINA AI
MARINA AIvor 24 Tagen

@replayio Great share

Profilbild von Pushpendra Tripathi
Pushpendra Tripathivor 24 Tagen

@replayio Amazing

Profilbild von Jawad Rahman
Jawad Rahmanvor 24 Tagen

@replayio cool.

Profilbild von Abbas AI
Abbas AIvor 24 Tagen

@replayio Great share

Profilbild von Liam
Liamvor 24 Tagen

@replayio Amazing share

Profilbild von Dharmik Harinkhede
Dharmik Harinkhedevor 24 Tagen

@replayio Amazing share 💯

Ähnliche Videos

CLAUDE BUILT A TRADING SYSTEM ON MY MAC I gave Claude full control over my Mac and just left it running overnight No prompts, no detailed instructions – I just told it to figure out how to make money on Polymarket Then I closed the laptop and went to sleep In the morning, I opened my Mac and saw the terminal still running with logs constantly updating At first it looked like random activity, but once I scrolled through it, I realized it had actually built a structured system overnight It was already tracking wallets Ranking them by performance Filtering out the ones with random entries And focusing only on the ones with consistent behavior What surprised me the most is that it didn’t stop at analysis It organized everything into a working dashboard inside the terminal Capital, PnL, winrate – all updating in real time It even ranked wallets based on performance metrics like ROI, consistency, and execution timing This is the part I would normally spend hours building manually At that point, it was ready to trade, but not actually executing anything yet So I connected it to a Telegram copytrading bot to actually execute the trades, and just let it run Bot: Polymarket: After that, it started opening positions on its own A few hours later I checked the dashboard again Capital: $12,380 P&L: +$23,128 Winrate: 100% 48 trades executed Now I’m not even trading myself I just check the dashboard and see what it’s doing And the strange part is – it keeps getting better the longer it runs

𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗜𝗡 𝗠𝗜𝗡𝗗 ⛓🧠

82,898 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

everyone in iOS development should watch this. seriously, it might change the whole industry. i pointed claude code at a live ios device running on revyl, typed "test everything," and walked away. here's what's actually happening: ① you don't write the tests. no scripts, no selectors, no test plan. i never told it which screens to open or what to check. it read the app, decided what mattered, and tested it. the entire instruction was "test everything." ② it built its own test team. it looked at the app, clocked that it's basically four mini apps (rides, delivery, services, account), and split itself into 4 agents, one per surface. scoping coverage like that is usually a person's whole afternoon. it did it in seconds, unprompted. ③ all four ran at the same time, each on its own live device. this is where revyl comes in. every agent gets its own live ios session in the cloud, so four running apps get tested in parallel instead of taking turns on one simulator. serial testing turns coverage into a time tax. running all of it at once removes the tax. ④ it tests like a person, not like a script. each agent drives the app the way a user would, taps through the flows, and visually checks each screen against what it expected to see. nothing is pinned to a brittle element id, so renaming a button doesn't take down half your suite. that one detail is the most annoying thing about how we test today, and it just quietly goes away. ⑤ no xcuitest, no sims melting your laptop. i didn't write a single xcuitest script, and there were no simulators booting on my machine. the agents run on cloud devices, so coverage stops being capped by what your laptop can handle. the part that got me isn't that an agent tested an app. it's that i never told it how. i handed it a device and an intent, and it figured out the scoping, the parallelizing, and the driving on its own. if you still write and maintain mobile ui tests by hand, i'm not sure that lasts the year.

Landseer Enga

23,963 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten