Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Most $ONDO holders cannot name the entity that actually issued their token. I read the legal docs. Here is the real structure nobody is explaining. OUSG is issued by Ondo I LP. A Delaware limited partnership. The fund itself. USDY and the GM tokens are issued by Ondo Global...

10,453 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

The $ONDO DAO has 190,000 token holders. Only 3,040 have ever touched governance. The vote that decides everything about this investment has not even been filed yet. Most people bought $ONDO because of the narrative. BlackRock. Clearstream. Deutsche Börse. Tokenised Treasuries. The story is real, and the protocol is legitimate. $3.57 billion in TVL. $66 million in annual management fees from real assets. But here is what nobody told you when you bought: None of that revenue touches the $ONDO token right now. The Ondo DAO has had 9 proposals in its entire history. The last one was executed in January 2024. It was not a fee switch. Zero active proposals today. 190,000 token holders. 3,040 delegates. 1.6% of holders are participating in the governance that controls the future of your investment. The other 98.4% are holding a vote they have never cast. Protocol fees flow into Ondo Finance Inc., USDY LLC, and the Ondo Foundation. Operations. Audits. Legal. Compliance. Whatever remains stays with the corporate entities. Not with you. The fee switch changes this entirely. If it passes, protocol revenue begins flowing directly to token holders. That single vote is the difference between $ONDO being a speculation instrument and a cash flow asset. This structure was not an accident. Tokenised securities live inside regulated wrappers. Ondo deliberately kept the token outside the revenue loop during the build phase. You do not flip a switch before the rails are in place. SEC no-action letter received. Clearstream integration announced. DTCC partnership confirmed. 500 million regulated investors now have onchain access to US markets. The rails are now in place. Before you size your position, answer this honestly: Are you investing in Ondo Finance (the protocol) or $ONDO (the token)? Right now, those are two completely different bets. The protocol is already winning. The token is still waiting for permission to participate in that win. The window between now and that vote is the only time you can position before the crowd understands what they are actually buying. Most people will find out what $ONDO really is the day the fee switch passes, and the price has already moved. The people who understood the governance structure before the vote will not need to explain themselves later. Track the DAO. The most important moment in $ONDO history has not happened yet. You just understood it now.

2xnmore

61,042 views • 2 months ago

$ONDO is not a token waiting for adoption. It is already running two products with real money inside them right now. USDY: $2.14 billion in TVL. 3.55% APY. Deployed across Ethereum, Solana, Sui, Aptos, Mantle, Near, and six other chains. A yield-bearing stablecoin that outperforms a standard US Treasury Bill return every single day it runs. OUSG: $539 million in TVL. 3.43% APY. Built specifically for institutional investors who need 24/7 instant access to short-term US Treasuries without touching a bank or waiting for settlement windows. Combined TVL across both products: $2.68 billion. $ONDO's current market cap: $1.7 billion. Read that again. The protocol has $2.68 billion of real capital sitting inside its products right now and the market is valuing the entire protocol at $1.7 billion. TVL is 157% of market cap. Most DeFi protocols would celebrate a TVL equal to their market cap. $ONDO already has more real capital deployed in its products than the market thinks the entire protocol is worth. That is not a narrative. That is a balance sheet. USDY price accrues daily. OUSG beats the T-Bill rate consistently. Both are growing. Both are live. Both have institutional counterparties on the other side of every single transaction. The SEC confidential filing is active. The DTCC consortium seat is confirmed. Over 200 tokenised US stocks are preparing to launch on Solana. The product is built. The capital is inside it. The institutional pipeline is forming. The people who understood this before the repricing will not need to explain their positioning later

2xnmore

22,273 views • 1 month ago

Most $ONDO holders are waiting for the fee switch. Nobody is asking who is actually allowed to flip it. Here is what the DAO docs say and why it changes everything. You need 100 million ONDO just to submit a proposal. Not to pass one. Not to win a vote. Just to put something on the table for discussion. There have been exactly 9 proposals in the entire history of the ONDO DAO. Zero of them have ever touched fees. Zero have ever discussed revenue sharing. Zero have proposed any form of value accrual to token holders. The last proposal was a simple token unlock in January 2024. That was 16 months ago. This is not governance apathy. This is governance architecture. The rules were written so that retail cannot force this conversation. Mid-sized holders cannot force it either. Only whales, VCs, and foundation-aligned wallets hold enough ONDO to submit anything. Past votes averaged between 50 and 600 participating addresses. In a protocol with 3,040 delegates and tens of thousands of holders, that number tells you everything about who is actually in control. The fee switch is not delayed because nobody wants it. It is delayed because the people who can call the vote have not decided it is time yet. That changes the entire question you should be asking. Stop asking when the fee switch drops. Start asking which wallet submits it. And what changes between now and then that makes it worth their while to pull the trigger. The answer to that question is where the real alpha lives. Agree or cap?

2xnmore

24,313 views • 2 months ago

Nobody is talking about what just happened in Frankfurt. Ondo, Clearstream, and Deutsche Börse Group just announced a partnership that changes the entire $ONDO thesis. Clearstream is not a startup. It is the post-trade infrastructure that European institutional capital actually runs on. 20 trillion euros in assets under custody. The settlement and custody backbone of the largest financial markets in the world. Here is what was just announced. Phase one: now live on 360X (Deutsche Börse Group’s regulated digital asset trading venue) Ondo tokenised stocks and ETFs are now live on 360X. AAPLon, NVDAon, TSLAon, MSFTon, GOOGLon, METAon, SPYon, QQQon. The largest tokenised securities bulk listing on 360X to date. That is phase one. Phase two: what changes everything Ondo tokenised assets will be integrated into Clearstream's custody, settlement, and collateral infrastructure. Institutions across Europe will be able to hold tokenised Apple stock in the same custody system where they hold their traditional securities. Same workflow. Same settlement rails. Same infrastructure they have used for decades. But onchain. Clearstream will also make assets it holds in custody available to Ondo in tokenised form for distribution to Ondo's global client network outside the US. That is a two-way bridge. Ondo brings assets onchain. Clearstream distributes them through institutional infrastructure. The wall between crypto rails and traditional finance just came down in both directions simultaneously. This follows Ondo's recent regulatory approval to offer tokenised stocks and ETFs across 30 European countries. 500 million investors now have regulated onchain access to US markets. Most people are still thinking about $ONDO as a crypto token. The institutions just started thinking about it as post-trade infrastructure. Those are two completely different categories of bets. The crowns were never up for debate. Most people just found out too late.

2xnmore

22,911 views • 2 months ago

Holding a tokenised stock just became something completely different. $ONDO just partnered with Broadridge Financial Solutions, the company that settles over $15 trillion in securities every single day and serves over 10,000 public companies as the backbone of global investor communications. Here is what this actually means. Until today, holding a tokenised stock onchain gave you price exposure. That was it. The voting rights, the governance participation, the shareholder communications that traditional investors take for granted, none of that transferred to the onchain wrapper. That gap was the strongest argument against tokenised equities being taken seriously as a real alternative to traditional stock ownership. That argument no longer exists. Holders of more than 250 Ondo tokenized stocks and ETFs can now: - Submit voting preferences for underlying shares - Review prospectuses - Access regulatory filings - Receive the same investor communications that traditional shareholders receive Through Broadridge's established infrastructure. Weighted proportionately by token ownership. Onchain token. Traditional shareholder rights. Simultaneously. This is Ondo's core design goal made real: tokenized stocks that meet every standard of traditional markets while adding everything blockchain infrastructure uniquely enables. 24/7 trading. Instant settlement. Permissionless access. Global reach. And now full governance participation. The numbers behind this announcement deserve to sit on their own line: $800 million in TVL across 250+ tokenized stocks. Roughly 70 percent total market share in tokenized equities. Available on Solana, Ethereum, and BNB Chain. Supported by Binance, Bitget, MetaMask, Ledger, and Blockchain․com. Ondo is not building toward dominance in tokenised equities. It already has it. This partnership with Broadridge is not a growth move. It is a maturity move, the difference between a crypto product that mimics traditional finance and an on-chain product that fully integrates with it. The last wall between tokenised stocks and real stocks just came down. The people who understood $ONDO before this announcement already know what it means for where this goes next. The people who read this and still wait for more confirmation will explain later why it was obvious all along.

2xnmore

25,499 views • 2 months ago

Most $SUI holders know one thing about the token: total supply is capped at 10 billion. They have never read the mechanic that makes that cap matter. It is called the Storage Fund. And it is the most important thing in the $SUI tokenomics docs that nobody is talking about. Here is exactly how it works: Every time a transaction adds data to the Sui blockchain, the user pays a storage fee. That fee does not go to validators directly. It goes into the Storage Fund, a pool of SUI that never fully depletes. Here is where it gets interesting. The Storage Fund has its own stake in the network. It earns staking rewards the same way every other stakeholder does. Those rewards are then distributed to validators to compensate them for storing historical data. This solves a problem every other blockchain ignores: When a new validator joins Sui, they have to store all the historical data from transactions that happened before they existed. Why would a new validator pay to store someone else's old data? The Storage Fund pays them for it. Past users who created the storage requirements in the first place funded the pool. Future validators get compensated from that pool indefinitely. The fund pays out only the returns on its capital, never the principal. It cannot be drained. It is designed to survive forever. Now here is the part that directly connects to $SUI token value. The Sui docs state this explicitly: Deflation is a feature of Sui, not a bug. Here is why: Total supply is capped at 10 billion SUI. As network activity increases, more transactions are processed. More transactions mean more storage fees flowing into the Storage Fund. As the Storage Fund grows, it holds more SUI. More SUI held in the fund means less SUI in active circulation. Less circulating supply against the same or growing demand means the value of each SUI token increases. Network growth directly reduces circulating supply. That is not speculation. That is the economic model built into the protocol at the architecture level. One more detail worth knowing: If you delete data you stored on chain, you receive a partial refund of your original storage fees. The system charges for storage, rewards deletion, and compounds the fund's stake indefinitely. Most people holding $SUI today are pricing the speed narrative: The parallel transaction processing. The sub-second finality. The Move language safety. They have not started pricing the storage fund deflation mechanic. That gap between what the tokenomics actually does and what the market currently understands is where the long-term thesis lives. The people who read the docs always buy before the people who read the price.

2xnmore

47,562 views • 2 months ago