Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

MOST PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE A SUBSCRIPTION PROBLEM. They have a default-price problem. $20 here. $12 there. $10 for a tool used twice a month. Another $23 because cancelling feels annoying. The trap is thinking the sticker price is the real price. It usually is not. Audit the stack.... show more

Fluixo

4,630 subscribers

15,059 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

3 Kommentare

Profilbild von sonicdr1p

sonicdr1pvor 2 Monaten

fr, the small ones stack up fast. audit everything once a year and it hits different

Profilbild von 0xSlyth

0xSlythvor 2 Monaten

fr

Profilbild von BonBonaz

BonBonazvor 2 Monaten

i totally get that, so many hidden costs we don't notice

Ähnliche Videos

Plaid’s problem is not that they don’t have the tools to do the job, it’s that the tools are being used for the wrong jobs.

Plaid’s problem is not that they don’t have the tools to do the job, it’s that the tools are being used for the wrong jobs.

Dan Thomas MS

11,567 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Shaheed Raisi's widow on international inaction on the war in Gaza: "I do not believe people don't sympathize with Gaza, but we are not willing to pay the price. Our problem is the number of people willing to pay the price is very low, for example, to confront Israel. People can confront this criminal gang. But the price is high and not a lot are willing to pay it." - Jamileh Alamolhoda

Shaheed Raisi's widow on international inaction on the war in Gaza: "I do not believe people don't sympathize with Gaza, but we are not willing to pay the price. Our problem is the number of people willing to pay the price is very low, for example, to confront Israel. People can confront this criminal gang. But the price is high and not a lot are willing to pay it." - Jamileh Alamolhoda

jmk

20,083 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

you are collecting AI tools, like they are the skill they are not the tools are all sliding to the same place, by next quarter they are interchangeable what is not, is knowing which output is actually good and being willing to kill the rest the model makes ten versions, it cannot tell you which one to send

you are collecting AI tools, like they are the skill they are not the tools are all sliding to the same place, by next quarter they are interchangeable what is not, is knowing which output is actually good and being willing to kill the rest the model makes ten versions, it cannot tell you which one to send

Lagosaur

10,933 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

AI is shaping the future whether we like it or not. Technology itself is not the problem. The problem is deploying powerful tools without guardrails, transparency, or accountability. AI should be a tool that works for people – not one that extracts value and burdens workers.

AI is shaping the future whether we like it or not. Technology itself is not the problem. The problem is deploying powerful tools without guardrails, transparency, or accountability. AI should be a tool that works for people – not one that extracts value and burdens workers.

Rep. Ilhan Omar

28,248 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

"The price hike is not high,go to Pakistan and check their fuel price & food prices Thanks to Modi that price hike is only Rs. 5,else it would have been higher had Modi not been there We don't have any problem with the price hike,it's for the nation" A loyal dog of the BJP !!

"The price hike is not high,go to Pakistan and check their fuel price & food prices Thanks to Modi that price hike is only Rs. 5,else it would have been higher had Modi not been there We don't have any problem with the price hike,it's for the nation" A loyal dog of the BJP !!

Nehr_who?

34,371 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Ed Zitron said on Bloomberg that every dollar you spend on an AI subscription burns between three and thirteen dollars behind the scenes. The price you pay has almost nothing to do with what the product costs. Your twenty dollar plan feels cheap because it is supposed to. The real cost of running the model on your prompts is several times what you hand over. The gap is covered by venture capital, not by the business working. That gap cannot stay open forever. At some point the price has to move toward the real cost. When it does, the product you built your day around gets more expensive or gets worse. Probably both. We have already seen the preview. When Anthropic raised its real token rates last year, the startups built on top of it had to scramble. Cursor, one of the fastest growing coding tools in the world, was forced to tear up its pricing overnight because the underlying cost it had been shielded from suddenly landed on its books. That is the whole industry in miniature. Everyone downstream is building on a number that is not real yet. Millions of people are wiring AI into how they work, how they write, how they code. They are doing it at a price that exists to hook them, not to last. The subsidy is not generosity. It is a customer acquisition cost with an expiration date. The bill is coming. Most people building on top of it have no idea what their workflow actually costs. Watch the interview on Bloomberg Podcasts

Ed Zitron said on Bloomberg that every dollar you spend on an AI subscription burns between three and thirteen dollars behind the scenes. The price you pay has almost nothing to do with what the product costs. Your twenty dollar plan feels cheap because it is supposed to. The real cost of running the model on your prompts is several times what you hand over. The gap is covered by venture capital, not by the business working. That gap cannot stay open forever. At some point the price has to move toward the real cost. When it does, the product you built your day around gets more expensive or gets worse. Probably both. We have already seen the preview. When Anthropic raised its real token rates last year, the startups built on top of it had to scramble. Cursor, one of the fastest growing coding tools in the world, was forced to tear up its pricing overnight because the underlying cost it had been shielded from suddenly landed on its books. That is the whole industry in miniature. Everyone downstream is building on a number that is not real yet. Millions of people are wiring AI into how they work, how they write, how they code. They are doing it at a price that exists to hook them, not to last. The subsidy is not generosity. It is a customer acquisition cost with an expiration date. The bill is coming. Most people building on top of it have no idea what their workflow actually costs. Watch the interview on Bloomberg Podcasts

Ihtesham Ali

22,640 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

"You can’t just want it-you have to pay a price." The price of success is non-negotiable. You don’t get to decide if you’ll pay-only when and how. You either pay in discipline now, or you pay in regret later. Everybody wants to win. Not everybody’s willing to pay the price.

"You can’t just want it-you have to pay a price." The price of success is non-negotiable. You don’t get to decide if you’ll pay-only when and how. You either pay in discipline now, or you pay in regret later. Everybody wants to win. Not everybody’s willing to pay the price.

The Winning Difference

66,317 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Kwame Owino: This is a bad idea. The problem is not a housing problem. The problem is that people do not have enough income to be able to pay for houses. If you put all this money together over time, this is a fund that will collapse in 7 years #TheBigConversation

Kwame Owino: This is a bad idea. The problem is not a housing problem. The problem is that people do not have enough income to be able to pay for houses. If you put all this money together over time, this is a fund that will collapse in 7 years #TheBigConversation

Citizen TV Kenya

149,008 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Brad Bradford: Toronto is now in the race for being one of the most antisemitic cities in the world. That's not a just a Jewish problem, that's a Toronto problem. If we don't have safety and security for all of our people... if the city is not safe, then the city is not free.

Brad Bradford: Toronto is now in the race for being one of the most antisemitic cities in the world. That's not a just a Jewish problem, that's a Toronto problem. If we don't have safety and security for all of our people... if the city is not safe, then the city is not free.

Build Canada - Toronto

204,270 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

your agent has thirty tools. it calls two of them. the other twenty eight are not sitting idle somewhere. they are in the request, every request, and they are doing damage in two places at once. first the obvious one. tool schemas go into the prompt, and a schema is not a name. it is a description, a parameter list, types, required fields, an example. thirty of those is a few thousand tokens that ship with every single call, including the ones where the agent just says thanks and stops. you are paying rent on twenty eight tools that have never fired. second, and this is the one that costs more. when the request says cancel the order, the model picks by matching against everything available. four of your tools are plausible: cancel_order, refund_order, update_order, void_order. it is choosing among them based on the descriptions you wrote, one afternoon, months ago. every tool you add is another candidate in that shortlist. the twenty eight you never call are not neutral. they are noise in the one decision that determines whether the run works. > why it grows without anyone deciding to nobody adds thirty tools on purpose. you add one for a task, it works, it stays. six months later the registry is a catalogue and no one has ever removed anything, because removing a tool feels risky and adding one feels free. and there is no feedback telling you otherwise. the unused ones never error. they never appear in a failing trace. they are invisible in exactly the way that lets them accumulate. > what to actually do count calls per tool over the last thousand runs. this is one group-by and it usually shocks people. the ones at zero are pure cost. ship the tools the task needs, not the whole registry. a research phase does not need deploy. a writing phase does not need the database. swap the set between phases instead of loading everything up front. same agent, different tools, depending on where the run is. and when two tools could both plausibly answer the same request, that is not redundancy you can ignore. it is a coin flip you built into the system. the twenty eight tools are not unused. they are used every time, by the part of the run you cannot see.

your agent has thirty tools. it calls two of them. the other twenty eight are not sitting idle somewhere. they are in the request, every request, and they are doing damage in two places at once. first the obvious one. tool schemas go into the prompt, and a schema is not a name. it is a description, a parameter list, types, required fields, an example. thirty of those is a few thousand tokens that ship with every single call, including the ones where the agent just says thanks and stops. you are paying rent on twenty eight tools that have never fired. second, and this is the one that costs more. when the request says cancel the order, the model picks by matching against everything available. four of your tools are plausible: cancel_order, refund_order, update_order, void_order. it is choosing among them based on the descriptions you wrote, one afternoon, months ago. every tool you add is another candidate in that shortlist. the twenty eight you never call are not neutral. they are noise in the one decision that determines whether the run works. > why it grows without anyone deciding to nobody adds thirty tools on purpose. you add one for a task, it works, it stays. six months later the registry is a catalogue and no one has ever removed anything, because removing a tool feels risky and adding one feels free. and there is no feedback telling you otherwise. the unused ones never error. they never appear in a failing trace. they are invisible in exactly the way that lets them accumulate. > what to actually do count calls per tool over the last thousand runs. this is one group-by and it usually shocks people. the ones at zero are pure cost. ship the tools the task needs, not the whole registry. a research phase does not need deploy. a writing phase does not need the database. swap the set between phases instead of loading everything up front. same agent, different tools, depending on where the run is. and when two tools could both plausibly answer the same request, that is not redundancy you can ignore. it is a coin flip you built into the system. the twenty eight tools are not unused. they are used every time, by the part of the run you cannot see.

Hanako

24,656 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

If you do not have problem with this YOU are the problem There is a Place There is a time For each and everything Stop projecting your beliefs Stop projecting your faith on others

If you do not have problem with this YOU are the problem There is a Place There is a time For each and everything Stop projecting your beliefs Stop projecting your faith on others

Oxygen 💨

111,651 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

📁 Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, says the problem with AI is not if it works. It is what happens when it does. Because curing disease is not enough. The real question is: what do you do when you are no longer needed?

📁 Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, says the problem with AI is not if it works. It is what happens when it does. Because curing disease is not enough. The real question is: what do you do when you are no longer needed?

Jon Hernandez

49,677 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

A $170 AI bill in 10 days is not a cloud problem. It is a routing problem. Most devs send every task to the most expensive brain available. summaries small refactors docs scripts log parsing boilerplate That is how the bill gets stupid. The Mac Mini M4 trade is simple: run routine work locally keep private code on your desk pay once for hardware save frontier models for hard calls Local AI does not beat Claude at everything. It does not need to. It only needs to replace the boring prompts that never needed a frontier model in the first place. Cloud AI stays. The default route changes. Full breakdown below ↓

A $170 AI bill in 10 days is not a cloud problem. It is a routing problem. Most devs send every task to the most expensive brain available. summaries small refactors docs scripts log parsing boilerplate That is how the bill gets stupid. The Mac Mini M4 trade is simple: run routine work locally keep private code on your desk pay once for hardware save frontier models for hard calls Local AI does not beat Claude at everything. It does not need to. It only needs to replace the boring prompts that never needed a frontier model in the first place. Cloud AI stays. The default route changes. Full breakdown below ↓

Fluixo

35,295 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Elon Musk was asked what happens to people when the machines no longer need them. He didn’t soften it. Musk: “There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better. These are not things I wish would happen. They probably will.” Sit with that second sentence. He is not celebrating. He is not selling a vision. He is telling you what he believes is inevitable and admitting he wishes it weren’t. That is not optimism. That is a confession. Most people are still arguing over whether this is real. Whether it’s their job or someone else’s. Whether the timeline is years away or decades. Musk isn’t arguing. He resolved it. And it bothers him. Musk: “I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don’t think we’re going to have a choice.” Not a political position. Not a utopian proposal. A concession. We are building something so capable that human labor stops being a required input to the economy. The machine does not need rest. It does not need a salary. It does not call in sick. It does not ask for a raise. And it improves every single month. The jobs that feel safe right now are not safe because they are irreplaceable. They feel safe because the technology hasn’t fully arrived yet. It’s arriving. Musk: “How do people then have meaning? If there’s not a need for your labor, what’s the meaning? Do you feel useless?” He said that is the harder problem. Not the economics. Not the policy. Not how you fund UBI or make it hold. The harder problem is what happens to a person who built their entire identity around being needed. That is most people. You were trained from childhood to believe your value is what you produce. That your worth is what you earn. That rest is something you survive the week to reach, not something you deserve simply by existing. When the machine removes the need for your labor, that belief does not update. It breaks. The people least prepared for that moment are the ones who worked the hardest. The ones who took the most pride in being indispensable. The ones who made work the whole answer. Losing the job is survivable. Losing the reason to get up is not. That is what Musk is actually asking. Not how do we pay people. How do we build a world where people still feel like they matter when the economy no longer needs them. Nobody in power is seriously working on that answer. The machine didn’t wait.

Elon Musk was asked what happens to people when the machines no longer need them. He didn’t soften it. Musk: “There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better. These are not things I wish would happen. They probably will.” Sit with that second sentence. He is not celebrating. He is not selling a vision. He is telling you what he believes is inevitable and admitting he wishes it weren’t. That is not optimism. That is a confession. Most people are still arguing over whether this is real. Whether it’s their job or someone else’s. Whether the timeline is years away or decades. Musk isn’t arguing. He resolved it. And it bothers him. Musk: “I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don’t think we’re going to have a choice.” Not a political position. Not a utopian proposal. A concession. We are building something so capable that human labor stops being a required input to the economy. The machine does not need rest. It does not need a salary. It does not call in sick. It does not ask for a raise. And it improves every single month. The jobs that feel safe right now are not safe because they are irreplaceable. They feel safe because the technology hasn’t fully arrived yet. It’s arriving. Musk: “How do people then have meaning? If there’s not a need for your labor, what’s the meaning? Do you feel useless?” He said that is the harder problem. Not the economics. Not the policy. Not how you fund UBI or make it hold. The harder problem is what happens to a person who built their entire identity around being needed. That is most people. You were trained from childhood to believe your value is what you produce. That your worth is what you earn. That rest is something you survive the week to reach, not something you deserve simply by existing. When the machine removes the need for your labor, that belief does not update. It breaks. The people least prepared for that moment are the ones who worked the hardest. The ones who took the most pride in being indispensable. The ones who made work the whole answer. Losing the job is survivable. Losing the reason to get up is not. That is what Musk is actually asking. Not how do we pay people. How do we build a world where people still feel like they matter when the economy no longer needs them. Nobody in power is seriously working on that answer. The machine didn’t wait.

Dustin

247,233 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

A 90-second SaaS explainer can cost $12 to make and sell for $800 That is the part most people miss about AI video The money is not in posting random generated clips and hoping the algorithm likes them The money is in turning the same pipeline into a deliverable businesses already pay for A founder sends a product brief Claude turns it into a script and scene plan Midjourney creates the frames Runway adds motion ElevenLabs records the narration Suno makes the background music Make sends the finished video to the client folder Now the output is not "content" It is a product video a SaaS company can use on a homepage, pitch deck, ad or launch page The stack costs $124/month One video costs around $12 to produce The selling price can be $350-$800 That is why AI video gets interesting when you stop thinking like a creator and start thinking like a service business The tools are cheap The finished outcome is not

A 90-second SaaS explainer can cost $12 to make and sell for $800 That is the part most people miss about AI video The money is not in posting random generated clips and hoping the algorithm likes them The money is in turning the same pipeline into a deliverable businesses already pay for A founder sends a product brief Claude turns it into a script and scene plan Midjourney creates the frames Runway adds motion ElevenLabs records the narration Suno makes the background music Make sends the finished video to the client folder Now the output is not "content" It is a product video a SaaS company can use on a homepage, pitch deck, ad or launch page The stack costs $124/month One video costs around $12 to produce The selling price can be $350-$800 That is why AI video gets interesting when you stop thinking like a creator and start thinking like a service business The tools are cheap The finished outcome is not

Asteri

11,809 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Everything is available at a the price of everything will go up.However,the biggest problem will be for the third world countries.They are not the kind of people who can afford an guess is that famine is on the way. J Bhandari

Everything is available at a the price of everything will go up.However,the biggest problem will be for the third world countries.They are not the kind of people who can afford an guess is that famine is on the way. J Bhandari

Andrew Bridgen

10,766 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

American has a health insurance plan with UnitedHealthcare His wife needed surgery to remove her gallbladder - Surgery cost was $15,000 - Overnight stay was $12,000 - Insurance paid $900, he must pay the rest His son needed an ear surgery, the cost of the surgery was going to be $11,000 with insurance. The cash price for the surgery was $6,000 “The cash price is like half of what it is if you run it through insurance” So he tried to not use his insurance and pay the cash price, this is what happened “I was going to do for my wife's surgery. I was gonna say, we're just not even using insurance. We'll just cancel it. And I'll just pay the self-pay price. Turns out you can't do that because the hospital will sue you if they find out you have health insurance because they make more money if they charge your health insurance.” This is a scam He says he’s not paying the bill because it’s a scam, “We're wanting to try to soon, try to save up money for that so we can have another kid. People wonder why the birth rate is so low, which honestly, I'm not going to pay any of this bill either. Like, what do got to do? Take me to jail?” “Number one cause for bankruptcy is medical debt. Why is it that it is just okay if in this country to extract wealth from people that don't have any? But if you're a billionaire, you don't even have to pay taxes.Because that's all any of this is. It's all a scam. It's all designed to screw you over and take your money. The people that have no money, they want to take more of your money and give it to the millionaires and the billionaires. Well, you get screwed. You get stuck with bankruptcy and your kids have no future.”

American has a health insurance plan with UnitedHealthcare His wife needed surgery to remove her gallbladder - Surgery cost was $15,000 - Overnight stay was $12,000 - Insurance paid $900, he must pay the rest His son needed an ear surgery, the cost of the surgery was going to be $11,000 with insurance. The cash price for the surgery was $6,000 “The cash price is like half of what it is if you run it through insurance” So he tried to not use his insurance and pay the cash price, this is what happened “I was going to do for my wife's surgery. I was gonna say, we're just not even using insurance. We'll just cancel it. And I'll just pay the self-pay price. Turns out you can't do that because the hospital will sue you if they find out you have health insurance because they make more money if they charge your health insurance.” This is a scam He says he’s not paying the bill because it’s a scam, “We're wanting to try to soon, try to save up money for that so we can have another kid. People wonder why the birth rate is so low, which honestly, I'm not going to pay any of this bill either. Like, what do got to do? Take me to jail?” “Number one cause for bankruptcy is medical debt. Why is it that it is just okay if in this country to extract wealth from people that don't have any? But if you're a billionaire, you don't even have to pay taxes.Because that's all any of this is. It's all a scam. It's all designed to screw you over and take your money. The people that have no money, they want to take more of your money and give it to the millionaires and the billionaires. Well, you get screwed. You get stuck with bankruptcy and your kids have no future.”

Wall Street Apes

325,933 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Why you should NOT use Supabase: 1. SDK Trap - not TypeScript by default, type-gen is bad, easy to make mistakes 2. Security with the SDK is terrible - need to set up a lot of things to have something work 3. Vendor lock-in with the Auth, don't have your keys 4. Pricing way more expensive than a $8/month db + better-auth 5. Better alternative for all tools they provide

Why you should NOT use Supabase: 1. SDK Trap - not TypeScript by default, type-gen is bad, easy to make mistakes 2. Security with the SDK is terrible - need to set up a lot of things to have something work 3. Vendor lock-in with the Auth, don't have your keys 4. Pricing way more expensive than a $8/month db + better-auth 5. Better alternative for all tools they provide

Melvyn • Builder

26,810 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

POLYMARKET CEO ADMITTED WHO ACTUALLY MAKES MONEY ON HIS PLATFORM. AND IT IS NOT MOST PEOPLE. Shayne Coplan said it directly at Harvard. Most users lose money on Polymarket. Here is the exact breakdown he gave: • top traders (a tiny percent) capture almost all the profits • most regular users finish negative, usually small amounts • Polymarket is a zero-sum game minus platform fees. money moves between users. the platform does not pay out of its own pocket • newcomers treat it like a lottery. they lose. • disciplined traders with real probability skills and risk management win consistently Coplan's honest take: do not play if you do not understand you can lose real money. most people on Polymarket are spectators who occasionally bet like it is a lottery. Watch the full Harvard interview then read the breakdown below.

POLYMARKET CEO ADMITTED WHO ACTUALLY MAKES MONEY ON HIS PLATFORM. AND IT IS NOT MOST PEOPLE. Shayne Coplan said it directly at Harvard. Most users lose money on Polymarket. Here is the exact breakdown he gave: • top traders (a tiny percent) capture almost all the profits • most regular users finish negative, usually small amounts • Polymarket is a zero-sum game minus platform fees. money moves between users. the platform does not pay out of its own pocket • newcomers treat it like a lottery. they lose. • disciplined traders with real probability skills and risk management win consistently Coplan's honest take: do not play if you do not understand you can lose real money. most people on Polymarket are spectators who occasionally bet like it is a lottery. Watch the full Harvard interview then read the breakdown below.

Nikiton

23,245 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten