Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Most people don’t realize “Harper Valley PTA” was a debut single. It turned Jeannie C. Riley into a star in 1968, selling over 6 million copies. Even wilder, it made her the first woman to take the same song to No. 1 on both the pop and country charts...

37,329 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

I'm sorry, but this is actually ridiculous Kate. "Strip That" is your favourite Liam song? First of all, it's called Strip That Down. If it's supposedly your favourite song, you'd think you'd at least know the title. But that's not even the part that gets me. This is the same song you sat there laughing about while reading out a comment calling Liam "such a hypocrite." "Liam's such a hypocrite because he's telling her she's covered up for once but he has a song called Strip That Down." Instead of shutting that down, you laughed. Liam then had to explain himself: "Strip That Down is a song about keeping the music stripped down... want me the message to Ed asking why he wrote the song." He had to defend the meaning of his own song because you chose to give that comment a platform. And now, somehow, after all that... it's suddenly your favourite Liam song? The same song you publicly associated with people calling him a hypocrite. The same song you never defended when he was sitting right beside you explaining himself. The same song you've suddenly turned into a sentimental favourite after trying to turn it into a joke. It's amazing how everything connected to Liam seems to become meaningful only after he's no longer here. First it was suddenly a "sign" from the universe. Now Strip That Down is suddenly your favourite song. The history hasn't changed. People watched those videos in real time. People remember who ended up defending Liam and it wasn't you. If it's genuinely your favourite Liam song, maybe start by learning what it's actually called. Because after everything that happened around that song, this feels less like appreciation and more like another attempt to rewrite the past. #JusticeForLiam

Iris

80,120 views • 1 month ago

THE FOUR HORSEMEN STORY DOESN’T MAKE SENSE!!!🚨🚨🚨 Thread🧵 Notice : this is pure speculation and nothing about this is factual information. All the information provided is fully based on what we see/saw on the internet. Please RT for awareness. First of all i would just like to say that A-Reece has no reason not to answer his phone for a whole month especially from a guy that he worked with before and has a good working relationship with. Something just doesnt feel right. Get your popcorn🍿 1. This first started when Nasty C leaked or hinted on being on the same song as A-Reece. Note that Nasty C specifically mentioned that Stogie T asked him to do a hook for him and says he will work on the verse in the meantime, meaning that he was initially asked to do both a hook and a verse. Also note that the Date of this interview is back in may meaning that the song had been in the making for awhile. BET! 2. Stogie T finally talks about the after it comes out on a radio show. He clearly states that he sent them both the beat and with Nasty C he talks about a hook and with A-Reece he is clearly referring to a verse/bars since he says “things that Slimes know him for”. BET! 3. L Tido invites MAGGZ on his podcast and he clearly indicates that MAGGZ is “ GONNA” (note that word) have the best verse on the song and during this time L Tido only knew that only Stogie T, A-Reece and MAGGZ will have verses while Nasty C is on the hook and i will prove that on number 4. So by this time L Tido already underestimates Stogie T and A-Reece pen. 4. After the song drops L Tido’s tone changes from MAGGZ to Nasty C having the best verse and clearly indicates that Nasty C didn’t have a verse and was initially supposed to be on only the hook and indicates again that Nasty C sent his verse a week before the song released. The song got released on the 28th of November meaning that Nasty C sent his verse during the week 16th - 22th This is 4 proofs that Nasty C was asked for a hook. Note and pay proper attention as this leads into 5 down below…

theboyjay

34,669 views • 7 months ago

satoshi never existed. nobody writes code like that. not that clean, not that surgical. the early bitcoin codebase doesn’t read like code from some anonymous guy on the internet. bitcoin's early codebase looks like it was handed to us. the whitepaper came out six weeks after the 2008 crash. that's not enough time to dream up a working distributed consensus system, let alone build one. then there’s secp256k1. not secp256r1, the curve everybody used. k1 was obscure, weird, and a terrible choice if you were just following convention. but it also happened to be one of the hardest to backdoor. and then satoshi disappears. roughly a million btc, untouched. people don’t walk away from that kind of money unless the money was never the point. because maybe bitcoin was never just money. what it actually did was create a global incentive to build compute. millions of people, in every country, pouring capital into hardware and electricity to chase block rewards. no state could have coordinated it that fast. no company could have justified it. a protocol paying out internet money gets people moving. then nvidia happened. the same GPUs pushed into the world for mining turned out to be perfect for large-scale parallel compute. the same hardware appetite bitcoin created ended up helping make modern deep learning possible. bitcoin launches in 2009. imagenet breaks things open in 2012. three years. bitcoin was the bootloader. and we’ve been running the install script.

tetsuo

53,736 views • 5 months ago