Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Most people get this wrong in 5 seconds. The drawing says "be careful" for a reason.A 50° angle,a 130° angle,and one missing angle marked K. Looks easy. it isn't. What's K? Drop your answer below. No calculator.

jennyriza777's profile picture

Jenny

1,088 subscribers

507,305 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

Eğitim
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Most AI filmmakers know the names of camera angles. Very few know what those angles are actually doing to the story. - A low angle is not automatically “cinematic.” - A Dutch angle is not something you add because the frame feels boring. - And a high angle does not simply mean “weak.” The camera should have a reason to be where it is. Here are 8 angles worth understanding: → Eye-level: For honesty, intimacy, dialogue and natural performance. → Low angle: For authority, threat, monumentality and pressure. → Ground-level: For speed, scale, physicality and extreme size contrast. → High angle: For vulnerability, isolation, exposure and entrapment. → Overhead / Top-down: For geography, choreography, patterns and surveillance. → Dutch angle: For instability, unease and moments when the story itself feels wrong. → POV / Subjective: For immersion, fear, urgency and restricted information. → Over-the-shoulder: For dialogue, eyelines, relationships and screen geography. But this is the important part for AI filmmaking: Do not prompt: “Cinematic low-angle shot of a powerful man.” Direct the geometry instead: SHOT SIZE + CAMERA HEIGHT + ANGLE + LENS + COMPOSITION + CAMERA BEHAVIOR + ACTION Example: “Medium-wide low-angle shot, camera 50 cm above the floor, 32mm lens. Commander stands screen-center beneath converging ceiling beams. Prisoner remains seated in the foreground. Locked camera. The commander slowly lowers his eyes toward him.” That gives the model something useful: where the camera is, what it sees, how perspective should feel, where the characters are, and what happens during the shot. The rule I keep coming back to: Do not choose the angle that looks coolest. Choose the angle that communicates the moment best. I put all 8 angles, their storytelling purpose, scene examples and AI prompts into one cheat sheet. Save it for your next AI film. Share it with someone who is still prompting “cinematic camera angle” and hoping for the best. PS:) Follow for more! . .
0:20

Most AI filmmakers know the names of camera angles. Very few know what those angles are actually doing to the story. - A low angle is not automatically “cinematic.” - A Dutch angle is not something you add because the frame feels boring. - And a high angle does not simply mean “weak.” The camera should have a reason to be where it is. Here are 8 angles worth understanding: → Eye-level: For honesty, intimacy, dialogue and natural performance. → Low angle: For authority, threat, monumentality and pressure. → Ground-level: For speed, scale, physicality and extreme size contrast. → High angle: For vulnerability, isolation, exposure and entrapment. → Overhead / Top-down: For geography, choreography, patterns and surveillance. → Dutch angle: For instability, unease and moments when the story itself feels wrong. → POV / Subjective: For immersion, fear, urgency and restricted information. → Over-the-shoulder: For dialogue, eyelines, relationships and screen geography. But this is the important part for AI filmmaking: Do not prompt: “Cinematic low-angle shot of a powerful man.” Direct the geometry instead: SHOT SIZE + CAMERA HEIGHT + ANGLE + LENS + COMPOSITION + CAMERA BEHAVIOR + ACTION Example: “Medium-wide low-angle shot, camera 50 cm above the floor, 32mm lens. Commander stands screen-center beneath converging ceiling beams. Prisoner remains seated in the foreground. Locked camera. The commander slowly lowers his eyes toward him.” That gives the model something useful: where the camera is, what it sees, how perspective should feel, where the characters are, and what happens during the shot. The rule I keep coming back to: Do not choose the angle that looks coolest. Choose the angle that communicates the moment best. I put all 8 angles, their storytelling purpose, scene examples and AI prompts into one cheat sheet. Save it for your next AI film. Share it with someone who is still prompting “cinematic camera angle” and hoping for the best. PS:) Follow for more! . .

Beginnersblog

24,320 görüntüleme • 13 gün önce

There is something wrong if you are not building simple Defi Staking agEUR to earn more should be easy: that’s why we have a zap feature in Angle⚡️ Come with any token on Angle App, and in 1 click, get your tokens swapped into agEUR and staked so you start earning immediately!
0:11

There is something wrong if you are not building simple Defi Staking agEUR to earn more should be easy: that’s why we have a zap feature in Angle⚡️ Come with any token on Angle App, and in 1 click, get your tokens swapped into agEUR and staked so you start earning immediately!

Angle 📐

18,119 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

This angle of Jamal Murray’s #TissotBuzzerBeater from inside the building 🙌 Submit your in-arena or at-home angle of last night’s game-winner for a chance to be featured:
0:13

This angle of Jamal Murray’s #TissotBuzzerBeater from inside the building 🙌 Submit your in-arena or at-home angle of last night’s game-winner for a chance to be featured:

NBA

168,933 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Might be the most outrageous batted ball of all time. Think about this one often. It's a damn shame it happened the season before the statcast era began (2014) What's the best guess on the exit velocity and launch angle?
0:12

Might be the most outrageous batted ball of all time. Think about this one often. It's a damn shame it happened the season before the statcast era began (2014) What's the best guess on the exit velocity and launch angle?

Tanner Stokey

1,611,553 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

An essential bit of gamedev math - atan2! We often know a target's position and want to face it. But how do we get the angle? angle = atan2(y / x) Or in 3D... angle = atan2(x / z) (We can also see below, what happens if we use atan instead of atan2) #godot #gamedev
0:17

An essential bit of gamedev math - atan2! We often know a target's position and want to face it. But how do we get the angle? angle = atan2(y / x) Or in 3D... angle = atan2(x / z) (We can also see below, what happens if we use atan instead of atan2) #godot #gamedev

FriendlyCosmonaut

111,445 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Aaaaa I thought he went for the mic and sang to Tae’s mic because HA HA it must be it, right? BUT OMG THIS ANGLE NO HE LITERALLY WENT FOR A KISS
0:16

Aaaaa I thought he went for the mic and sang to Tae’s mic because HA HA it must be it, right? BUT OMG THIS ANGLE NO HE LITERALLY WENT FOR A KISS

Eve

106,943 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🚨The Difference in Range Between Messi and Ronaldo is Massive, Where No Distance or Angle seems to Matter for Ronaldo, but Messi Scores only from near the Box The Difference in the Number & Angle Of Green Spots on the Map Says it All. But Ronaldo is Portrayed as a Poacher ?🤯
0:10

🚨The Difference in Range Between Messi and Ronaldo is Massive, Where No Distance or Angle seems to Matter for Ronaldo, but Messi Scores only from near the Box The Difference in the Number & Angle Of Green Spots on the Map Says it All. But Ronaldo is Portrayed as a Poacher ?🤯

Preeti

19,304 görüntüleme • 26 gün önce

seedance 2.5 off a script (NO PROMPT) and every single thing came back right - the hands - the eyes - the phone angle - the timing on the last line 15 seconds, one generation, about $3 i wrote what she says and that was the entire input still seeing people write a page of prompt for this model you don't have to anymore
0:15

seedance 2.5 off a script (NO PROMPT) and every single thing came back right - the hands - the eyes - the phone angle - the timing on the last line 15 seconds, one generation, about $3 i wrote what she says and that was the entire input still seeing people write a page of prompt for this model you don't have to anymore

CEO

14,027 görüntüleme • 29 gün önce

$0 creator shoots are becoming the new ugc testing floor seedance 2.0 makes this “yapping” format way easier to scale not because every video has to look perfect because every video can feel like a different creator talking to the same buyer same script different face different hook different setting different tone different objection that’s how you turn one product into 40 creator-style tests without waiting on creators beauty angle fitness angle student angle founder angle customer rant angle problem-aware demo angle the winner isn’t always the best video it’s usually the one that feels most native to the buyer rt + comment "yapflow" and i’ll send you the seedance ai ugc workflow (follow for dm)
0:11

$0 creator shoots are becoming the new ugc testing floor seedance 2.0 makes this “yapping” format way easier to scale not because every video has to look perfect because every video can feel like a different creator talking to the same buyer same script different face different hook different setting different tone different objection that’s how you turn one product into 40 creator-style tests without waiting on creators beauty angle fitness angle student angle founder angle customer rant angle problem-aware demo angle the winner isn’t always the best video it’s usually the one that feels most native to the buyer rt + comment "yapflow" and i’ll send you the seedance ai ugc workflow (follow for dm)

Florin

10,604 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Seen this angle on TT and where’s the dissent in this or did he get one for simply approaching the ref during a VAR check in a civil manner…? I don’t like Neto but what’s the yellow card offence in here
0:16

Seen this angle on TT and where’s the dissent in this or did he get one for simply approaching the ref during a VAR check in a civil manner…? I don’t like Neto but what’s the yellow card offence in here

-

427,186 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

this is a big upgrade for AI video you can now drag & drop 3D characters, blocks to build 3d scene, then control the camera angle precisely for Seedance 2.0. no need to do it in Blender anymore
0:10

this is a big upgrade for AI video you can now drag & drop 3D characters, blocks to build 3d scene, then control the camera angle precisely for Seedance 2.0. no need to do it in Blender anymore

el.cine

48,078 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk 🚨 Muzzle Flash: Second Shooter Location, Reflection, or Both? This video captures a flash on a window right as Charlie Kirk was shot. Let’s break this down… follow the numbers on the videos. #1. This video shows what appears to be a muzzle flash, just as Charlie is shot, leading people to believe the shooter was to Charlie’s right.. Notate the people to the left of the flash #2. This photo shows the location of the flash. Notate people to the left, on a middle-landing on a staircase. #3. This photo shows a clearer image showing both the middle-landing and the same location of the flash. It is a window. #4 . This video shows the building behind Charlie, which is a long hallway. This debunks any claims the shot came from here. — I zoom in where Charlie was — I zoom in on staircase — I zoom in on the window/flash — I zoom in on where suspected shooter was #5. I notate the flash reflection angles. — Video angle #1 notated — two reflection paths notated in relation to Video angle #1. 1. Reflection angle shows where we were told the shooter was. 2. Reflection angle shows mirrored angle, obviously where there is no reports of a shooter being in. 🔻 Final conclusion: This to me is very likely a muzzle flash reflection from a far off location. I am unsure of the reflection angle however, but this can be 100% proven if someone were to recreate the angles… maybe with a flash camera. If anyone is willing to, or has the means to do this (safely), this will either prove the shot came where the FBI said it came from, or it will prove there was a second shooter, in the direction of the mirrored angle.
0:16

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk 🚨 Muzzle Flash: Second Shooter Location, Reflection, or Both? This video captures a flash on a window right as Charlie Kirk was shot. Let’s break this down… follow the numbers on the videos. #1. This video shows what appears to be a muzzle flash, just as Charlie is shot, leading people to believe the shooter was to Charlie’s right.. Notate the people to the left of the flash #2. This photo shows the location of the flash. Notate people to the left, on a middle-landing on a staircase. #3. This photo shows a clearer image showing both the middle-landing and the same location of the flash. It is a window. #4 . This video shows the building behind Charlie, which is a long hallway. This debunks any claims the shot came from here. — I zoom in where Charlie was — I zoom in on staircase — I zoom in on the window/flash — I zoom in on where suspected shooter was #5. I notate the flash reflection angles. — Video angle #1 notated — two reflection paths notated in relation to Video angle #1. 1. Reflection angle shows where we were told the shooter was. 2. Reflection angle shows mirrored angle, obviously where there is no reports of a shooter being in. 🔻 Final conclusion: This to me is very likely a muzzle flash reflection from a far off location. I am unsure of the reflection angle however, but this can be 100% proven if someone were to recreate the angles… maybe with a flash camera. If anyone is willing to, or has the means to do this (safely), this will either prove the shot came where the FBI said it came from, or it will prove there was a second shooter, in the direction of the mirrored angle.

MJTruthUltra

10,665,164 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

there’s a huge difference between watching someone ski a cliff and actually standing at the top of one. from the camera angle it looks almost manageable, but 80 FEET OF EMPTY SPACE changes the whole thing. you have to commit, stay composed through the drop and trust that you’ve judged the landing correctly. i can understand why people watch this and immediately think “yeah… absolutely not.”
0:11

there’s a huge difference between watching someone ski a cliff and actually standing at the top of one. from the camera angle it looks almost manageable, but 80 FEET OF EMPTY SPACE changes the whole thing. you have to commit, stay composed through the drop and trust that you’ve judged the landing correctly. i can understand why people watch this and immediately think “yeah… absolutely not.”

Ski Life

13,402 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

What this could be - a goaltend, 2 points for K-State - no goaltend and an easy put back, 2 points for K-State What this cannot be - an overturned goaltend 3 possessions later resulting in taking 2 points off the board for K-State Explain yourself Big 12 Conference
0:14

What this could be - a goaltend, 2 points for K-State - no goaltend and an easy put back, 2 points for K-State What this cannot be - an overturned goaltend 3 possessions later resulting in taking 2 points off the board for K-State Explain yourself Big 12 Conference

qǝlɐɔ

52,767 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

In a realm of podomancy (toe reading), the angle, length, and alignment of your toes are believed to reflect specific personality traits. While this is purely for fun and not supported by science, check the descending angle of your toes to see your type. What does the podomancy chart say your personality is? It tells me my personality is unique. Though my one toe is much shorter than shown. That diagram is the closest to my feet. 🤷🏼‍♀️
0:12

In a realm of podomancy (toe reading), the angle, length, and alignment of your toes are believed to reflect specific personality traits. While this is purely for fun and not supported by science, check the descending angle of your toes to see your type. What does the podomancy chart say your personality is? It tells me my personality is unique. Though my one toe is much shorter than shown. That diagram is the closest to my feet. 🤷🏼‍♀️

🌸𝓐𝓾𝓭𝓻𝓮𝔂🌸

24,080 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🧵YOU ARE DROPPING WRONG ON LONG BUS ROUTES Most Calculators still tell you to... ➜ Deploy at a normal point ➜ Dive at a high angle ➜ Glider spamming if you can't reach But on long buses, this loses time. Sometimes the fastest marker is one that looks too high ⬇️
0:11

🧵YOU ARE DROPPING WRONG ON LONG BUS ROUTES Most Calculators still tell you to... ➜ Deploy at a normal point ➜ Dive at a high angle ➜ Glider spamming if you can't reach But on long buses, this loses time. Sometimes the fastest marker is one that looks too high ⬇️

Drop Mazter

67,992 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

This is why people think the moon landings and this Artemis II is fake. How do you cut from one camera angle to the next and the person is already in the air in a split second if it’s live? Not possible.
0:12

This is why people think the moon landings and this Artemis II is fake. How do you cut from one camera angle to the next and the person is already in the air in a split second if it’s live? Not possible.

Ghost of Eight Thoughts

473,860 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

SCARY SIGHT: Two men were spotted holding on for dear life at the peak of a 130-foot drop after a roller coaster malfunctioned in Texas. The pair was suspended at a terrifying 90-degree angle facing straight toward the ground. A frantic relative called 911 as the riders hung there for nearly one hour before they were safely brought down.
0:16

SCARY SIGHT: Two men were spotted holding on for dear life at the peak of a 130-foot drop after a roller coaster malfunctioned in Texas. The pair was suspended at a terrifying 90-degree angle facing straight toward the ground. A frantic relative called 911 as the riders hung there for nearly one hour before they were safely brought down.

Fox News

1,093,317 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce