正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Most people think hardware wallets are only for crypto traders. That’s surface-level thinking. A device like OneKey is really about one thing, - Control. You worked for your money. Why leave the door open? With a hardware wallet; ✔️Your assets are offline ✔️No random app, no hacker, no phishing...

39,659 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Larry Fink just told you what he is building. Fink: “All investments on a tokenized platform… We have one common blockchain.” Not some investments. All of them. Every stock. Every bond. Every acre of land. Every barrel of oil. On one ledger. Controlled by whoever writes the rules of that ledger. That is not a financial product. That is a $300 trillion architecture with one set of keys. Tucker Carlson: “It’s not about their nukes?” Catherine Austin Fitts: “No. Iran Central Bank counts. If you’re gonna come out with programmable money, with digital IDs that are interoperable globally… you can’t afford leakage. Iran right now is the big leakage.” The conflict with Iran is not about weapons. It is not about ideology. It is about one central bank that has not plugged into the system. A nation becomes a threat the moment it refuses to connect. Not a military threat. A structural one. Because one country operating outside programmable money is proof that the exit works. That proof cannot exist. So it gets removed. Now understand what programmable money actually means. Physical cash has no conditions. You hold it. You spend it. No one reaches inside your wallet and switches the bills off. Programmable money is different in one specific way. It can be turned off. Not stolen. Not seized. Not taxed through courts. Switched off. Your balance stays the same. The number does not change. It just stops working. For you. At the time and place of someone else’s choosing. Fitts is not theorizing about a future system. She is describing the architecture being built right now. When your money is programmable, your behavior becomes a variable in someone else’s equation. Your political donations. Your travel. Your purchases. All of it readable. All of it actionable. Not by law. By code. Laws require courts. Courts require time. Code requires nothing. One flag. You can no longer transact. No judge. No jury. No appeal. No sound. Fink is not hiding this. Fitts is not speculating. They are describing the destination. The people who hold physical assets. Who diversify across jurisdictions. Who refuse to convert everything into a token on someone else’s ledger. They are not paranoid. They are already outside the cage. When $300 trillion moves onto one blockchain, under one set of rules, written by the people who control that chain, the word for that is not innovation. The word for that is capture. The door does not slam shut. It locks.

Dustin

45,154 次观看 • 2 个月前