Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Mr Ami Kozak drops new Dan Bongino impression roasting Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton's gun collection before breaking into Tucker Carlson questioning the meaning of the word "Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)" and insisting that any inconsistent statements were uttered by the triplet siblings he doesn't have.

15,333 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 🚨Language Warning🚨 Dan Bongino Dan Bongino absolutely SMOKES Tucker Carlson Tucker Carlson : BONGINO: “Him (Tucker) and his life loser zero of a brother. The daddy's probably looking down in disgrace that they spawned these two losers. But he decides to go on a show and gets all cute with his social media people again with the Epstein and the Jews. And all this that this is just their entire life, which is kind of weird because his buddy Tucker's buddy who were both Nepo babies themselves Hunter Biden. They were buddies. If there was ever an Epstein class of people. It's these two whose entire lives that little bosom buddies Hunter Carlson the tag team like the road warriors in the WWF or something like a little tag team. They slap each other off or like two little Nepo babies. You've never earned a single thing in their entire life. Little bums losers and Fucker, I mean Tucker's uh, his brother Fuckley Buckley is, you know Fuckley. He's another one a little Nepo baby bum. What does he do exactly? So they decide to go on the show and bring their the little surrogate, Jimmy Doof in there and of course, they they have to bullshit you again so I'll show you some receipts to show you how Tucker's just making this up because he just needs again Tucker wants to make sure, and these people, that maximum chaos results and that this kind of stuff happens at Turning Point. Not that we focus on what's going on in geopolitics the economy the government cleanup happening now.” Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV) Catch The Dan Bongino Show EVERY WEEKDAY on Rumble 🏴‍☠️ at 10am ET

MAGA Kitty

398,000 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

𝐓𝐔𝐂𝐊𝐄𝐑 𝐒𝐀𝐈𝐃 𝐁𝐎𝐍𝐆𝐈𝐍𝐎’𝐒 𝐓𝐄𝐗𝐓𝐒 𝐏𝐑𝐎𝐕𝐄 𝐓𝐑𝐔𝐌𝐏 𝐒𝐇𝐔𝐓 𝐃𝐎𝐖𝐍 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐁𝐔𝐓𝐋𝐄𝐑 𝐏𝐑𝐎𝐁𝐄 — 𝐒𝐎 𝐁𝐎𝐍𝐆𝐈𝐍𝐎 𝐏𝐔𝐁𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐇𝐄𝐃 𝐓𝐇𝐄𝐌 𝐋𝐈𝐕𝐄 Tucker Carlson went on a livestream claiming he had proof — private texts from Dan Bongino — that President Trump 𝐬𝐡𝐮𝐭 𝐝𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐠𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 into the Butler ass∗ssination attempt. So Bongino did the one thing Tucker didn't plan for: he 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐭𝐞𝐱𝐭𝐬 𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐢𝐫. Nowhere in them does Bongino say Trump shut down the probe. He says the opposite — that Trump is a victim who was briefed and satisfied, and that the case stays open but inactive only because no new leads have panned out. Then came the receipts. A November 21 Fox News report — published 𝐛𝐞𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐞 Tucker claims the two even spoke — quotes the FBI calling the Crooks case “𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦,” not closed. Trump himself told the Daily Caller he is satisfied with the Butler findings. One man brought screenshots and dates. The other brought a story. 𝐓𝐮𝐜𝐤𝐞𝐫 𝐡𝐚𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐢𝐜. 𝐁𝐨𝐧𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐨 𝐡𝐚𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐞𝐢𝐩𝐭𝐬.

M.A. Rothman

404,386 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

No, Tucker has not primarily fixated on "criticizing Israel." Tucker mostly attacks supporters of Israel. Viciously. Often in very personal terms. Take Dave Rubin: "Dave doesn't have much of a soul." Dave's crime? He offered to moderate a debate b/t Tucker & Ben Shapiro. Also important is that Dave Rubin is, by almost all accounts, just a flat-out nice guy, someone with a terrific "off-air" reputation. Dave went out of his way — repeatedly — to avoid direct attacks on Tucker's character. He has not even called Tucker an anti-Semite. In stark contrast, Tucker has mocked and belittled Dave across several shows. Most revealing is that he made a comment probably as ghoulish as someone could say about a person that he actually knows. Consider that Tucker has been to Dave Rubin's home, had him on his own show many times, appeared several times on Dave's show, and blurbed Dave's book. Despite all of that, Tucker not only said no to the debate — whereas Ben Shapiro immediately said yes — but he decided to vilify Dave Rubin so profoundly as to claim he "doesn't have much of a soul." Not a particularly Christian thing to say of someone. In fact, it is deeply un-Christian to suggest that any human lacks a soul. Why? Because Christianity — like Judaism — believes that every person has a soul and is created in God's image. Genesis 1:27 says that humans are created "b'tzelem Elohim" — meaning in the image of God. And Genesis 2:7 states that God finished creating Adam by "blowing into his nostrils the breath of life" — literally a soul — and as a result, Adam "became a living being." Even if Tucker's Biblical knowledge is just surface deep, suggesting that someone doesn't have a soul is simply a way of saying that he's not truly human, that he lacks worth in God's eyes. Very dark stuff. Sadly, this is part of a much broader pattern that goes far beyond Dave Rubin. Tucker is not merely "criticizing Israel," as Megyn Kelly and others continually suggest. Tucker's reaction was also quite telling to Dave's offer to a debate with Ben Shapiro. Why not just say no and leave it at that? What is Tucker so afraid of? ***Video was a collaboration with the incredible Nathan Livingstone (Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV))***

Joel Mowbray

145,203 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Dinesh D’Souza Sounds the Alarm on Tucker Carlson “The old Tucker ... would never have described Hamas not as a terrorist group but as a legitimate “political movement." ~ Dinesh D'Souza Conservative author and filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza told Eric Metaxas that Tucker Carlson’s behavior over the past several months reveals “something much larger is going on” and represents a dramatic departure from the commentator he once was. D’Souza pointed to a series of statements that he said the “old Tucker” would never have made: praising Sharia law as having “some good social benefits,” describing Hamas not as a terrorist group but as a legitimate “political movement,” and even coming to the defense of Nicolás Maduro, whom he called “the socialist narco-dictator of Venezuela.” “All of this is so unexpected that something larger is afoot,” D’Souza continued, linking Carlson’s recent controversy surrounding white nationalist Nick Fuentes to the same broader pattern. He argued that non-Jewish conservative Christians like himself and Metaxas pose a particular problem for Carlson’s narrative. “Tucker would love to have it be Tucker and Candace against Ben Shapiro and Mark Levin because then he gets to say, ‘Look, it’s the Jews I’m going up against,’” D’Souza explained. “But we are very awkward for him because we’re Christians. We’ve done a lot of work in history and apologetics. We actually know what we’re talking about. So we’re a great embarrassment to the theological and political absurdities that have been put out by Mr. Tucker Carlson.”

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

32,286 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

🚨BOMBSHELL: Joe Kent's old army buddy reveals the true story. On tonight's episode of the Political Theater, Alladin, who served in Iraq with Joe Kent back in 2012 and have been close ever since, revealed that he had a phone call with Joe Kent and revealed that Kent said he did not have access to the information he claimed he had, that he was coerced into pulling this stunt, and that the interview with Tucker Carlson was scheduled A WEEK in advance. "Title 10 is internal collection authority, title title 50 is external and NCTC they don't have any of that. So the NCTC agents is basically they get fed information from FBI, other intelligence agencies and they try to make sense of the intel intelligence that they receive. And that's what was his frustration because he was asking questions and he was not getting it and that's where the confusion happened." Q: "So this means that his role actually had no access to intelligence unless it was given to him and then he was asking for specific intelligence and they were not getting giving it to him whether it existed or not, he has no ability to even know that in the first place?" A: "Correct." Q: "Who pushed him into this because I'm sure you asked him?" A: "He did not want to divulge that. I think I know where it was. I can tell you one thing. Uh the interview with Tucker Carlson, it was not scheduled like an hour after uh his resignation letter. It was actually scheduled the week prior." "He has his own frustration with everything and uh I don't think uh the Tucker Carlson because I had uh about I'm not going to lie to you guys I had about 12 minutes uh a phone call with him and and I think he has some regrets to the Tucker Carlson interview because Tucker Carlson like he veered him into like the whole Charlie Kirk and other stuff that he was not expecting anyway and he was like just basically that as the interview was going. So yeah, this to me tells me that Joe Kent made a mistake and whoever it is that veered him into this direction uh would also made a mistake. So, not wise, but you know, oh well." "By the by the way, I operated with that guy actually I was in combat with him. That's how well, I know Joe Kent. I was in combat with him in 2012." "I have no idea who put him into this and I'm still upset about it. And uh uh and thank God, he had a a 12 minute to spare me a f*cking conversation with with him. But I think we can course correct with that." I knew right from the start that this was shady. Now it seems I have been vindicated, Dan Bongino has been vindicated, Trump has been vindicated. This was a coordinated attack, most likely by Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes, on the administration.

Jacktron

34,932 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce