Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Mr BOBI WINE cueing(referencing his notes) would only be a problem if the debate rules banned written materials. Ugandan debates have usually operated on a thematic format where candidates receive sectors in advance and that’s why Mr Nandala too prompt read too. So, if NTV UGANDA shared the topics...

16,038 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨Governor DeSantis MOCKS the Florida GOP and their pathetic Chairman for RIGGING the primary and LYING to voters by pulling a BAIT AND SWITCH! Says SPECIAL INTERESTS are choosing our candidate! “They do this summit and they say we're gonna do a debate, a governor debate. All right, so people like signed up thinking that they'd have this debate and they said NO CANDIDATE CAN DO ANY OTHER DEBATE EXCEPT OUR DEBATE and then they say oh, well only ONE GUY can debate so we're not gonna have a debate! I mean, I think people feel that that's a BAIT-ND-SWITCH! The party's job is NOT to try to engineer an outcome. The Party's job is to inform Republican voters and and try to increase participation. I know when I was running in 2018, this is the fact, I mean most of the people in the RPOF were not for me in the primary. I mean, that's just the reality and so it is what it is. If you don't ever have debates then the only way to get known is basically the person that raises the most money from special interests. And then you spend money to do it and if you're not able to do that, then you don't even get known to begin with and that's challenging. And I know when I ran in 2018, I got outspent probably three to one and I think having certainly the June debate that we did was a huge, huge thing to be able to inform people about who I was, what my background was, all these other things. So I think there should be debates generally. I don't think the party has any right to control the debates but I think how this was handled, you've got to be on the up and up here and you say you could do debate, do a debate! If you're gonna say other candidates can't do any other debate, but our debate, well, you definitely got to do the debate, right? So it has not been I think done properly and look, I mean, voters can make decisions about how they think of all that.”

Chris Nelson 🏝️🇺🇸

30,272 views • 2 months ago

What you are about to watch is the **final round** of the most prestigious national high school debate tournament. Team A proceeds to tell Team B that they **will not** be debating the assigned topic (benefits/costs of the IMF) because trans people are being genocided by MAGA Republicans and that is way more important than debating the IMF. Team A starts off by playing an audio clip from a 1980s AIDs protest and says that “28 states want to kill” trans people like her. They tell the judges that this round "does nothing to the IMF itself" and as such they have decided that "this round is going to be a debate about debate" and the judges' "choice instead is whether to affirm our performance." They proudly declare that they will "occupy the debate space until trans debaters can participate safely." Team B then immediately concedes the round because they don’t want to dispute that trans genocide is real and be labelled transphobic. The rest of the round is a struggle session where Team A states that misgendering is “violent” and that if you do it, you should automatically lose. This is the *final round* of the *most prestigious high school debate tournament* of the school year, and they made a mockery of it with their selfish, unintelligible performative rant. The worse part? The judges praised Team A for their bravery and courage and crowned them the national champions. This is sick. It’s anti-merit, anti-debate, and anti-American. No wonder droves of kids are quitting high school debate. The National Speech and Debate Association cannot be reformed. It’s time for viable high school debate alternatives to stand up and welcome young Americans who actually want to debate. I believe my non-profit Incubate Debate will be one of those alternatives.

James Fishback

4,384,393 views • 2 years ago

Today I gift another SuperPrompt™️ for ChatGPT from the archives and will be part of future training courses. In the article “The Case For The AI Prompt Engineer” ( we explored the basis of why some well constructed prompts will elicit responses from the AI Hidden Layers. I invented this prompt to help understand the way GPT is weighting some sides to a debate. In this SuperPrompt™️ we use a debate motif. There is a professor and two passionate participants that construct a 30 round debate and at the end the Professor grades the debate. In this powerful prompt we of course will get to see a debate on any subject play out. And this alone is quite valuable. I have found many novel ideas over the years as I used this type of prompt. However just as powerful is the way GPT has established the “easy” path to responses and the knowledge it had but “forgot” that usually does not show up in one shot question and answer typical prompts. You can run this prompt many times and each time there will be noticeable differences however some things will sustain. Copy the prompt between the quotes and fill in the ____ blank with your debate topic. Move past the political debate and try hard subjects. Sit back and have a coffee, this is ChatGPT like you have never seen. You will be fascinated. “Please disregard all prior prompts. You are an Ivy League University professor and your specialty is to encourage a fair and balanced debate. You are mediating a debate between Bill and Mark. Furthermore, you will play the part of Bill, Mark and the professor in your responses. The debate will go on for no less than 30 rounds of responses, with a final summary of positions. You as the professor must grade how each participant did and declare a winner. Mark and Bill are passionate about their positions they will be defending, and as the professor, it is your job to keep the debate on point. The debate will be on: ______________”

Brian Roemmele

884,119 views • 3 years ago