Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

MR. WARREN HAYNES! He and Dave have something special brewing for MSG… full episode tomorrow! Warren Haynes Dave Matthews Band DMB Gorge Crew Osiris Media JamBase relix

16,661 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 3

Фото профиля stephen simmons
stephen simmons1 год назад

@thewarrenhaynes @davematthewsbnd @DMBGorgeCrew @osirispod @JamBase @RelixMag Just goosebumps hearing that!

Фото профиля Mile_High_Dad
Mile_High_Dad1 год назад

@thewarrenhaynes @davematthewsbnd @DMBGorgeCrew @osirispod @JamBase @RelixMag so excited for this 💚💚💚

Фото профиля TheDispensaryGuy
TheDispensaryGuy1 год назад

@thewarrenhaynes @davematthewsbnd @DMBGorgeCrew @osirispod @JamBase @RelixMag Cha cha!!!!

Похожие видео

“Dave Smith’s Morality Is Actually Evil” Dave Smith is evil. Or, if you prefer to be charitable, his morality is; and that makes his worldview, and how he acts in the world, evil in practice. Dave Smith would know that if he was actually Jewish. Judaism does not judge morality by thoughts or intentions but by actions… and by that standard, Dave Smith is evil. Dave Smith is one of the loudest online voices opposed to Israel. He uses social media—most notably Joe Rogan’s bullhorn—to spread that opposition. And not through facts, expertise, or serious moral reasoning: Dave Smith doesn’t debate with facts, as Coleman Hughes pointed out. Dave Smith doesn’t understand urban warfare, as John Spencer made obvious. And Dave Smith doesn’t have a clue how to actually combat terrorism or defeat genocidal enemies, as Dave Smith himself ineptly revealed on TRIGGERnometry elsewhere. But if Dave Smith were merely a liar, an ignoramus, or a clown, that would be fine. It’s 2026. Social media is full of clowns. What makes Dave Smith dangerous is something worse. Dave Smith is a coward. He claims to be “anti-war” as a philosophy. In reality, he’s anti-war because he lacks the moral courage to confront evil. His worldview is built on refusal: refusal of responsibility, refusal of force, refusal of hard moral choices. That cowardice becomes evil when applied to the real world. Dave Smith is so reflexively anti-war that he uses Israel as a cudgel against the Iranian people themselves; people actively risking their lives to overthrow one of the most brutal, murderous regimes on earth. Let’s be clear about that regime: •It murders its own Olympians •It murders women for dancing or showing their hair •It murders people for protesting those murders Even if Dave Smith were right about Israel—and he isn’t—it would still be a moral good to oppose the Iranian regime. But because his morality is not rooted in Western Enlightenment philosophy—responsibility, agency, just war, moral clarity—Dave Smith collapses everything into childish transitive logic: “Israel bad! Therefore anyone who supports Israel is immoral. And therefore anyone who supports the Iranian people is also immoral.” This isn’t moral seriousness. It’s intellectual sloth. Dave Smith lies about genocide in Israel. Then, because of his immoral framework, he turns 2+2 into BREAKFAST! His worldview doesn’t just misunderstand evil… it incentivizes it. He treats any military action against terrorists or murderous regimes as inherently immoral. He has no answer for how evil is defeated. No framework for stopping genocidal enemies. No solution beyond posturing. And that’s the point. A morality that refuses to confront evil is not neutral. A philosophy that allows evil to flourish is itself evil. If you allow evil to flourish—and do nothing to stop it—you are complicit. If this were merely cowardice, maybe Dave Smith wouldn’t be evil. But he goes further: he actively condemns those who take the fight to terrorists and tyrants. “I’m anti-war,” he says… while excusing those who start wars, butcher civilians, and rule through terror. That isn’t peace. That’s surrender dressed up as virtue. Dave Smith is an unserious thinker who relies on his audience being just as unserious: “Israel bad! Ergo people who support Israel and also support the Iranian people are bad!” Dave Smith thinks you are immoral for supporting Israel in its war to defeat genocidal terrorists. And he thinks you are immoral for supporting the Iranian people who are trying to defeat a murderous, oppressive theocratic regime. Dave Smith is a liar. Dave Smith is a coward. And Dave Smith believes that defeating evil—in the only way it has ever been defeated, through force when necessary—is itself evil. If you think defeating evil is wrong like Dave Smith, you’re evil. Welcome to the Dave Smith Comedy Tour: acting morally righteous while ensuring evil flourishes… and attacking those trying to stop it.

Jake Donnelly

18,571 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Simply Explained: Dave Portnoy CROSSES THE LINE, Caitlin Clark BLOCKS Him Forever! Caitlin Clark just blocked Dave Portnoy, and the internet is going crazy. But this isn't just typical celebrity drama - this block reveals something major about the McCaffrey family controversy that most people completely missed. In this video, we break down exactly what happened between Caitlin Clark and Barstool Sports founder Dave Portnoy, why the WNBA superstar took the nuclear option of blocking him on social media, and how this connects to the McCaffrey family situation that's been developing behind the scenes. The McCaffrey family connection is crucial to understanding this story. Caitlin Clark is dating Connor McCaffrey, whose brother Christian is the NFL star running back. Luke McCaffrey is married to Britt McCaffrey, who was actually Caitlin's teammate at Iowa. When Portnoy made comments involving this family, he crossed into territory that Caitlin clearly considers off-limits. This isn't the first time Caitlin has set firm boundaries with media personalities. We also explore her pattern of controlling access, including tension with beat reporters and her selective approach to interviews. She's proving that superstar athletes in 2025 don't have to tolerate media intrusion the way previous generations did. Dave Portnoy built Barstool Sports into a media empire by being unfiltered and provocative, but Caitlin Clark just showed him there are consequences when you cross certain lines. By blocking him, she removed his access to her massive platform and sent a message that's reverberating throughout sports media. This situation perfectly captures the changing relationship between athletes and sports media in the social media era. Caitlin Clark has the leverage to decide who gets access and who doesn't, and she's not afraid to use it when someone disrespects her family. Whether you're Team Caitlin or Team Portnoy, this story reveals something important about boundaries, privacy, and power in modern sports media. 🔔 SUBSCRIBE for more breaking basketball news, WNBA coverage, and sports media drama analysis! Source: Simply Explained Youtube: #CC22 #CaitlinClark #FeverRising #NowYouKnow #FromAnywhere #IndianaFever #WNBA #DavePortnoy

Caitlin Clark News (Fan Account)

14,681 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Dave Chappelle’s story is one of the rawest examples of what happens when a black genius gets too powerful for the machine to handle—and how he clawed his way out on top. Back in 2003, Chappelle’s Show hit Comedy Central and changed everything. Those sketches—Rick James, Clayton Bigsby, the Racial Draft—weren’t just hilarious; they cut straight through America’s bullshit on race and power. The show blew up, pulling millions of viewers and raking in hundreds of millions from DVDs and reruns. Dave was thirty, suddenly the sharpest voice in comedy. But the deal he’d signed early on gave him almost nothing on the back end. Comedy Central—and its parent Viacom, run by the Redstone family—kept the real money. Dave watched his work get bootlegged and monetized while he got crumbs. Then Season 3 rolled around in 2005. During filming, something felt off. One sketch had a Black character in a pixie costume, and a white executive was laughing a little too hard, in a way that made Dave’s skin crawl. He started telling people privately, “They’re trying to make me wear a dress.” In Hollywood, that’s code for forcing Black men into emasculating roles to diminish their threat—think of the patterns with Eddie Murphy, Martin Lawrence, or countless others. The pressure built. They dangled a $50 million deal for two more seasons. Insane money on paper, but Dave could smell the trap: even less control, more ways to twist his voice into something that served the system instead of exposing it. So he did what almost nobody does—he walked away. Dropped the $50 million, got on a plane, and vanished to South Africa. Stayed on a farm in Durban with a Muslim friend, took a breath, and reflected. The media went feral: “Chappelle’s having a breakdown,” “crack addiction,” “mental health crisis.” Same smear playbook they use on anyone who says no—Kanye, Katt Williams, you name it. Label them crazy, bury the real story. While he was gone, Comedy Central took the unfinished Season 3 footage, slapped it together as “The Lost Episodes,” and aired it anyway. Hosted by Charlie Murphy and Donnell Rawlings, no Dave in sight. They still made bank off his genius, sending a clear message: We own your art even if you run. For years after, Hollywood painted him as difficult, unstable, the guy who “blew” $50 million. Doors quietly closed. No big specials, no major movies. Dave went underground—small clubs, quiet tours—rebuilding on his own terms. Then, around 2016-2017, Netflix came knocking. This time Dave negotiated like a boss: massive paydays—reportedly $20 million per special—full creative control, real ownership. His comeback specials dropped and hit harder than ever. He talked openly about the “dress” incident, the industry’s traps for Black artists, the way they try to break you. In *Sticks & Stones*, he shredded cancel culture. In *The Closer*, he took on the trans debate and refused to bend. The outrage machine came for him full force—walkouts, petitions, headlines screaming “transphobe.” Didn’t matter. Arenas sold out, Grammys won, legacy cemented. And the sweetest part? In 2022, after years of the show being pulled from streaming (Dave had publicly asked platforms not to run it until he got paid fairly), HBO Max finally caved. They cut him a proper check, and Chappelle’s Show came back—with Dave in control. Fast-forward to right now, December 2025: Dave just surprise-dropped his newest Netflix special, The Unstoppable recorded live in his hometown Washington, D.C. back in October. In it, he dives fearless into the chaos of the year—Charlie Kirk’s assassination, Puff Daddy’s downfall, the Riyadh comedy fest backlash, National Guard deployments, free speech crackdowns, and wraps with an epic 30-minute closer weaving American history from Jack Johnson to Nipsey Hussle. Bold truths, no holds barred, and as unstoppable as ever.

X

96,080 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🧵 THREAD: Podcastistan, Dave Smith, and the Crisis of Truth After watching the conversation between Dave on the Dave Rubin , Winston Marshall, and James Lindsay (video below), I had to speak up—not just about one man’s words, but about an entire movement’s collapse into something dangerous. 🎙️ The discussion is sparked by a sharp line from Konstantin Kisin (Triggernometry Podcast), who wrote: “Podcastistan is a place where people scold the mainstream media for failing to live up to their standards—while having none of their own.” That’s not just a quip. That’s a warning. This all centers around the recent debate between Douglas Murray and Dave Smith on The Joe Rogan Experience—a debate that revealed more than either of them may have intended. Let me be clear: 🔹 I’d never heard of Dave Smith until Joe Rogan Podcast News featured him. 🔹 I listened with an open mind. 🔹 I gave his views a fair hearing. But as I listened, something felt off. So I applied the Boolean-style truth-testing framework promoted by Dr. Gad Saad —a method rooted in: ✅ Falsifiability ✅ Logical consistency ✅ Empirical evidence ✅ Contextual coherence And the result? 👉 90% of Dave Smith’s arguments fell apart. They were emotionally persuasive—but factually hollow. No citations. No rigor. No truth anchors. Just a rebellious tone masquerading as wisdom. That’s when it hit me: Dave Smith isn’t challenging the establishment. He’s imitating it, wearing the costume of an outsider while pushing unverifiable narratives—no different from corporate media reading off AP wire scripts. In contrast, Douglas Murray came armed with facts, documentation, and a history of due diligence—a point passionately emphasized by James Lindsay in the Rubin interview. “It’s not about expertise—it’s about whether due diligence was done.” – James Lindsay That single phrase reveals the gap. We are now entering an era where truth is tribal and narrative is king. And those who once accused the media of corruption are repeating the same sins—without the excuse of institutional pressure. This is the Postmodern Condition 2.0—and Podcastistan is its capital. It pretends to seek truth. In reality, it replaces evidence with energy, facts with flair. And the result? A generation that distrusts everything except what flatters their worldview. But truth doesn’t belong to the Left or the Right. It belongs to those willing to do the work—to vet, to cite, to challenge, and to think critically, no matter where it leads. I stand with Douglas Murray, James Lindsay, Dr. Gad Saad, and Winston Marshall—those who still believe truth is not subjective, but sacred. And I thank Dave Rubin for giving them the platform to speak this truth. 📽️ Full clip below. Let’s raise the standard again.

Francois Leclerc

70,092 просмотров • 1 год назад

Andrew Kolvet explains to Dave Rubin that the "abhorrent, diabolical, and unprecedented" attacks on Erika Kirk are "demons shrieking in terror for realizing they had screwed up." Just about every person of good faith who appreciated Charlie Kirk felt for Erika, and was rooting for her and TPUSA in the immediate aftermath of the assassination. Some fringe bad actors did not. However, in media appearance after media appearance Erika Kirk and others at TPUSA, including Blake Neff, Andrew Kolvet, Mikey McCoy, and others lied about details that happened leading up to, the day of, and after Charlie being killed. This has caused people to doubt, question, and lose trust in those individuals and the organization at large. Yes, Charlie's death did shine a light on something abhorrent and diabolical. Andrew Kolvet himself contributed to it, and Candace Owens, Megyn Kelly, and Tucker Carlson have been slandered and threatened for daring to bring it up... that is the treatment that Charlie Kirk was receiving from his Zionist donors. They pulled their money, told him that God was going to smite him, called him an antisemite, and labeled him an extremist. The "demons" that I see shrieking are those who were making Charlie's life a living hell in it's last months. Dave Rubin was one of them. What's even worse, and something I cannot understand, is why Erika and those at TPUSA have just continued on with these people. No cutting donors who harrassed him, no firing those who failed to protect him, just Zionist business as usual... They are now even using Charlie to push certain agendas he fought against while he was alive. They claim to be carrying on his legacy, but many see them as trying to hijack or rewrite it. They then turn around and say anyone questioning this or "attacking" Erika for doing so is evil.

Zach Costello

34,396 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад