正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

MR. WARREN HAYNES! He and Dave have something special brewing for MSG… full episode tomorrow! Warren Haynes Dave Matthews Band DMB Gorge Crew Osiris Media JamBase relix

The Corner of Grey Street Podcast

2,964 subscribers

16,661 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

教育音乐艺术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

3 条评论

stephen simmons 的头像

stephen simmons1 年前

@thewarrenhaynes @davematthewsbnd @DMBGorgeCrew @osirispod @JamBase @RelixMag Just goosebumps hearing that!

Mile_High_Dad 的头像

Mile_High_Dad1 年前

@thewarrenhaynes @davematthewsbnd @DMBGorgeCrew @osirispod @JamBase @RelixMag so excited for this 💚💚💚

TheDispensaryGuy 的头像

TheDispensaryGuy1 年前

@thewarrenhaynes @davematthewsbnd @DMBGorgeCrew @osirispod @JamBase @RelixMag Cha cha!!!!

相关视频

Dave & Goose playing “The Way It Is” by Bruce Hornsby was not on our 2024 bingo card. Truly epic! 🎥 Derek McClanahan Goose Dave Matthews Band Osiris Media Always Almost There @slowreadypod DMB Gorge Crew DMB Society

Dave & Goose playing “The Way It Is” by Bruce Hornsby was not on our 2024 bingo card. Truly epic! 🎥 Derek McClanahan Goose Dave Matthews Band Osiris Media Always Almost There @slowreadypod DMB Gorge Crew DMB Society

The Corner of Grey Street Podcast

23,675 次观看 • 1 年前

Warren Haynes talks about playing Cortez The Killer with the Dave Matthews Band for the first time during the 2003 Central Park show on the Bertcast podcast 🎥 bert kreischer #warrenhaynes #dmb #davematthewsband #davematthews #dmbgorgecrew #dmbgc #gorgecrew

Warren Haynes talks about playing Cortez The Killer with the Dave Matthews Band for the first time during the 2003 Central Park show on the Bertcast podcast 🎥 bert kreischer #warrenhaynes #dmb #davematthewsband #davematthews #dmbgorgecrew #dmbgc #gorgecrew

DMB Gorge Crew

51,783 次观看 • 1 年前

.Dave Matthews Band and Live Nation venues have partnered for the first zero waste tour ♻️ Hear about the sustainability efforts made possible by 400+ crew members & 350,000+ DMB fans #davematthewsband

.Dave Matthews Band and Live Nation venues have partnered for the first zero waste tour ♻️ Hear about the sustainability efforts made possible by 400+ crew members & 350,000+ DMB fans #davematthewsband

Live Nation

17,523 次观看 • 1 年前

Dave Matthews, the American singer-songwriter, guitarist, and bandleader best known as the frontman of the Dave Matthews Band (DMB)—one of the most commercially successful touring acts—reacts to the killing of Renee Nicole Good, posting a video on X saying: “I don’t want my taxes to pay for ICE masked thugs to roam our streets and terrorize our communities. Renee Nicole Good, murdered in the streets. He shot her three times in the head. Murdered in cold blood. These people are trying to tell us not to believe what we see. Fuck ICE.”

Dave Matthews, the American singer-songwriter, guitarist, and bandleader best known as the frontman of the Dave Matthews Band (DMB)—one of the most commercially successful touring acts—reacts to the killing of Renee Nicole Good, posting a video on X saying: “I don’t want my taxes to pay for ICE masked thugs to roam our streets and terrorize our communities. Renee Nicole Good, murdered in the streets. He shot her three times in the head. Murdered in cold blood. These people are trying to tell us not to believe what we see. Fuck ICE.”

Simon Ateba

11,774 次观看 • 6 个月前

“Dave Smith’s Morality Is Actually Evil” Dave Smith is evil. Or, if you prefer to be charitable, his morality is; and that makes his worldview, and how he acts in the world, evil in practice. Dave Smith would know that if he was actually Jewish. Judaism does not judge morality by thoughts or intentions but by actions… and by that standard, Dave Smith is evil. Dave Smith is one of the loudest online voices opposed to Israel. He uses social media—most notably Joe Rogan’s bullhorn—to spread that opposition. And not through facts, expertise, or serious moral reasoning: Dave Smith doesn’t debate with facts, as Coleman Hughes pointed out. Dave Smith doesn’t understand urban warfare, as John Spencer made obvious. And Dave Smith doesn’t have a clue how to actually combat terrorism or defeat genocidal enemies, as Dave Smith himself ineptly revealed on TRIGGERnometry elsewhere. But if Dave Smith were merely a liar, an ignoramus, or a clown, that would be fine. It’s 2026. Social media is full of clowns. What makes Dave Smith dangerous is something worse. Dave Smith is a coward. He claims to be “anti-war” as a philosophy. In reality, he’s anti-war because he lacks the moral courage to confront evil. His worldview is built on refusal: refusal of responsibility, refusal of force, refusal of hard moral choices. That cowardice becomes evil when applied to the real world. Dave Smith is so reflexively anti-war that he uses Israel as a cudgel against the Iranian people themselves; people actively risking their lives to overthrow one of the most brutal, murderous regimes on earth. Let’s be clear about that regime: •It murders its own Olympians •It murders women for dancing or showing their hair •It murders people for protesting those murders Even if Dave Smith were right about Israel—and he isn’t—it would still be a moral good to oppose the Iranian regime. But because his morality is not rooted in Western Enlightenment philosophy—responsibility, agency, just war, moral clarity—Dave Smith collapses everything into childish transitive logic: “Israel bad! Therefore anyone who supports Israel is immoral. And therefore anyone who supports the Iranian people is also immoral.” This isn’t moral seriousness. It’s intellectual sloth. Dave Smith lies about genocide in Israel. Then, because of his immoral framework, he turns 2+2 into BREAKFAST! His worldview doesn’t just misunderstand evil… it incentivizes it. He treats any military action against terrorists or murderous regimes as inherently immoral. He has no answer for how evil is defeated. No framework for stopping genocidal enemies. No solution beyond posturing. And that’s the point. A morality that refuses to confront evil is not neutral. A philosophy that allows evil to flourish is itself evil. If you allow evil to flourish—and do nothing to stop it—you are complicit. If this were merely cowardice, maybe Dave Smith wouldn’t be evil. But he goes further: he actively condemns those who take the fight to terrorists and tyrants. “I’m anti-war,” he says… while excusing those who start wars, butcher civilians, and rule through terror. That isn’t peace. That’s surrender dressed up as virtue. Dave Smith is an unserious thinker who relies on his audience being just as unserious: “Israel bad! Ergo people who support Israel and also support the Iranian people are bad!” Dave Smith thinks you are immoral for supporting Israel in its war to defeat genocidal terrorists. And he thinks you are immoral for supporting the Iranian people who are trying to defeat a murderous, oppressive theocratic regime. Dave Smith is a liar. Dave Smith is a coward. And Dave Smith believes that defeating evil—in the only way it has ever been defeated, through force when necessary—is itself evil. If you think defeating evil is wrong like Dave Smith, you’re evil. Welcome to the Dave Smith Comedy Tour: acting morally righteous while ensuring evil flourishes… and attacking those trying to stop it.

“Dave Smith’s Morality Is Actually Evil” Dave Smith is evil. Or, if you prefer to be charitable, his morality is; and that makes his worldview, and how he acts in the world, evil in practice. Dave Smith would know that if he was actually Jewish. Judaism does not judge morality by thoughts or intentions but by actions… and by that standard, Dave Smith is evil. Dave Smith is one of the loudest online voices opposed to Israel. He uses social media—most notably Joe Rogan’s bullhorn—to spread that opposition. And not through facts, expertise, or serious moral reasoning: Dave Smith doesn’t debate with facts, as Coleman Hughes pointed out. Dave Smith doesn’t understand urban warfare, as John Spencer made obvious. And Dave Smith doesn’t have a clue how to actually combat terrorism or defeat genocidal enemies, as Dave Smith himself ineptly revealed on TRIGGERnometry elsewhere. But if Dave Smith were merely a liar, an ignoramus, or a clown, that would be fine. It’s 2026. Social media is full of clowns. What makes Dave Smith dangerous is something worse. Dave Smith is a coward. He claims to be “anti-war” as a philosophy. In reality, he’s anti-war because he lacks the moral courage to confront evil. His worldview is built on refusal: refusal of responsibility, refusal of force, refusal of hard moral choices. That cowardice becomes evil when applied to the real world. Dave Smith is so reflexively anti-war that he uses Israel as a cudgel against the Iranian people themselves; people actively risking their lives to overthrow one of the most brutal, murderous regimes on earth. Let’s be clear about that regime: •It murders its own Olympians •It murders women for dancing or showing their hair •It murders people for protesting those murders Even if Dave Smith were right about Israel—and he isn’t—it would still be a moral good to oppose the Iranian regime. But because his morality is not rooted in Western Enlightenment philosophy—responsibility, agency, just war, moral clarity—Dave Smith collapses everything into childish transitive logic: “Israel bad! Therefore anyone who supports Israel is immoral. And therefore anyone who supports the Iranian people is also immoral.” This isn’t moral seriousness. It’s intellectual sloth. Dave Smith lies about genocide in Israel. Then, because of his immoral framework, he turns 2+2 into BREAKFAST! His worldview doesn’t just misunderstand evil… it incentivizes it. He treats any military action against terrorists or murderous regimes as inherently immoral. He has no answer for how evil is defeated. No framework for stopping genocidal enemies. No solution beyond posturing. And that’s the point. A morality that refuses to confront evil is not neutral. A philosophy that allows evil to flourish is itself evil. If you allow evil to flourish—and do nothing to stop it—you are complicit. If this were merely cowardice, maybe Dave Smith wouldn’t be evil. But he goes further: he actively condemns those who take the fight to terrorists and tyrants. “I’m anti-war,” he says… while excusing those who start wars, butcher civilians, and rule through terror. That isn’t peace. That’s surrender dressed up as virtue. Dave Smith is an unserious thinker who relies on his audience being just as unserious: “Israel bad! Ergo people who support Israel and also support the Iranian people are bad!” Dave Smith thinks you are immoral for supporting Israel in its war to defeat genocidal terrorists. And he thinks you are immoral for supporting the Iranian people who are trying to defeat a murderous, oppressive theocratic regime. Dave Smith is a liar. Dave Smith is a coward. And Dave Smith believes that defeating evil—in the only way it has ever been defeated, through force when necessary—is itself evil. If you think defeating evil is wrong like Dave Smith, you’re evil. Welcome to the Dave Smith Comedy Tour: acting morally righteous while ensuring evil flourishes… and attacking those trying to stop it.

Jake Donnelly

18,571 次观看 • 6 个月前

To change the world, it starts with one step. 20 years ago , Dave Matthews Band and I came together to work an an album with Hip Hip influences. 20 years later, the songs still slap on tour, and Steady As We Go is a wedding standard that couples have walked down the aisle and had their first dance to. The album was a root that kept growing steady, so ‘steady as we go’ to the next 20 years of STAND UP. And for me personally, You Might Die Trying has one of the greatest Hip Hop breakdowns in a song of all time!!!! Thank you to @davematthewsband to the incredible DMB fans. In these days and times, I hope you Stand Up and stay American, Baby. To change the world, it starts with one step. #DaveMatthewsBand #StandUp

To change the world, it starts with one step. 20 years ago , Dave Matthews Band and I came together to work an an album with Hip Hip influences. 20 years later, the songs still slap on tour, and Steady As We Go is a wedding standard that couples have walked down the aisle and had their first dance to. The album was a root that kept growing steady, so ‘steady as we go’ to the next 20 years of STAND UP. And for me personally, You Might Die Trying has one of the greatest Hip Hop breakdowns in a song of all time!!!! Thank you to @davematthewsband to the incredible DMB fans. In these days and times, I hope you Stand Up and stay American, Baby. To change the world, it starts with one step. #DaveMatthewsBand #StandUp

Mark Batson🇺🇸

28,472 次观看 • 1 年前

‘The same people cheering Charlie Kirk’s death have a ‘free Palestine’ logo on their social media’… No surprises there… 🙄 My special guest for today’s episode of ‘The Erin Molan Show’ is Five for Fighting legend John Ondrasik - not jewish - not Israeli - but one hell of an ally - and human being. Ps - he also names and shames Hollywood hypocrites AND performs a live rendition of ‘Superman’… 😭🙏❤️ Full show linked 👇

Erin Molan

110,776 次观看 • 10 个月前

Simply Explained: Dave Portnoy CROSSES THE LINE, Caitlin Clark BLOCKS Him Forever! Caitlin Clark just blocked Dave Portnoy, and the internet is going crazy. But this isn't just typical celebrity drama - this block reveals something major about the McCaffrey family controversy that most people completely missed. In this video, we break down exactly what happened between Caitlin Clark and Barstool Sports founder Dave Portnoy, why the WNBA superstar took the nuclear option of blocking him on social media, and how this connects to the McCaffrey family situation that's been developing behind the scenes. The McCaffrey family connection is crucial to understanding this story. Caitlin Clark is dating Connor McCaffrey, whose brother Christian is the NFL star running back. Luke McCaffrey is married to Britt McCaffrey, who was actually Caitlin's teammate at Iowa. When Portnoy made comments involving this family, he crossed into territory that Caitlin clearly considers off-limits. This isn't the first time Caitlin has set firm boundaries with media personalities. We also explore her pattern of controlling access, including tension with beat reporters and her selective approach to interviews. She's proving that superstar athletes in 2025 don't have to tolerate media intrusion the way previous generations did. Dave Portnoy built Barstool Sports into a media empire by being unfiltered and provocative, but Caitlin Clark just showed him there are consequences when you cross certain lines. By blocking him, she removed his access to her massive platform and sent a message that's reverberating throughout sports media. This situation perfectly captures the changing relationship between athletes and sports media in the social media era. Caitlin Clark has the leverage to decide who gets access and who doesn't, and she's not afraid to use it when someone disrespects her family. Whether you're Team Caitlin or Team Portnoy, this story reveals something important about boundaries, privacy, and power in modern sports media. 🔔 SUBSCRIBE for more breaking basketball news, WNBA coverage, and sports media drama analysis! Source: Simply Explained Youtube: #CC22 #CaitlinClark #FeverRising #NowYouKnow #FromAnywhere #IndianaFever #WNBA #DavePortnoy

Simply Explained: Dave Portnoy CROSSES THE LINE, Caitlin Clark BLOCKS Him Forever! Caitlin Clark just blocked Dave Portnoy, and the internet is going crazy. But this isn't just typical celebrity drama - this block reveals something major about the McCaffrey family controversy that most people completely missed. In this video, we break down exactly what happened between Caitlin Clark and Barstool Sports founder Dave Portnoy, why the WNBA superstar took the nuclear option of blocking him on social media, and how this connects to the McCaffrey family situation that's been developing behind the scenes. The McCaffrey family connection is crucial to understanding this story. Caitlin Clark is dating Connor McCaffrey, whose brother Christian is the NFL star running back. Luke McCaffrey is married to Britt McCaffrey, who was actually Caitlin's teammate at Iowa. When Portnoy made comments involving this family, he crossed into territory that Caitlin clearly considers off-limits. This isn't the first time Caitlin has set firm boundaries with media personalities. We also explore her pattern of controlling access, including tension with beat reporters and her selective approach to interviews. She's proving that superstar athletes in 2025 don't have to tolerate media intrusion the way previous generations did. Dave Portnoy built Barstool Sports into a media empire by being unfiltered and provocative, but Caitlin Clark just showed him there are consequences when you cross certain lines. By blocking him, she removed his access to her massive platform and sent a message that's reverberating throughout sports media. This situation perfectly captures the changing relationship between athletes and sports media in the social media era. Caitlin Clark has the leverage to decide who gets access and who doesn't, and she's not afraid to use it when someone disrespects her family. Whether you're Team Caitlin or Team Portnoy, this story reveals something important about boundaries, privacy, and power in modern sports media. 🔔 SUBSCRIBE for more breaking basketball news, WNBA coverage, and sports media drama analysis! Source: Simply Explained Youtube: #CC22 #CaitlinClark #FeverRising #NowYouKnow #FromAnywhere #IndianaFever #WNBA #DavePortnoy

Caitlin Clark News (Fan Account)

14,681 次观看 • 3 个月前

Dave Chappelle’s story is one of the rawest examples of what happens when a black genius gets too powerful for the machine to handle—and how he clawed his way out on top. Back in 2003, Chappelle’s Show hit Comedy Central and changed everything. Those sketches—Rick James, Clayton Bigsby, the Racial Draft—weren’t just hilarious; they cut straight through America’s bullshit on race and power. The show blew up, pulling millions of viewers and raking in hundreds of millions from DVDs and reruns. Dave was thirty, suddenly the sharpest voice in comedy. But the deal he’d signed early on gave him almost nothing on the back end. Comedy Central—and its parent Viacom, run by the Redstone family—kept the real money. Dave watched his work get bootlegged and monetized while he got crumbs. Then Season 3 rolled around in 2005. During filming, something felt off. One sketch had a Black character in a pixie costume, and a white executive was laughing a little too hard, in a way that made Dave’s skin crawl. He started telling people privately, “They’re trying to make me wear a dress.” In Hollywood, that’s code for forcing Black men into emasculating roles to diminish their threat—think of the patterns with Eddie Murphy, Martin Lawrence, or countless others. The pressure built. They dangled a $50 million deal for two more seasons. Insane money on paper, but Dave could smell the trap: even less control, more ways to twist his voice into something that served the system instead of exposing it. So he did what almost nobody does—he walked away. Dropped the $50 million, got on a plane, and vanished to South Africa. Stayed on a farm in Durban with a Muslim friend, took a breath, and reflected. The media went feral: “Chappelle’s having a breakdown,” “crack addiction,” “mental health crisis.” Same smear playbook they use on anyone who says no—Kanye, Katt Williams, you name it. Label them crazy, bury the real story. While he was gone, Comedy Central took the unfinished Season 3 footage, slapped it together as “The Lost Episodes,” and aired it anyway. Hosted by Charlie Murphy and Donnell Rawlings, no Dave in sight. They still made bank off his genius, sending a clear message: We own your art even if you run. For years after, Hollywood painted him as difficult, unstable, the guy who “blew” $50 million. Doors quietly closed. No big specials, no major movies. Dave went underground—small clubs, quiet tours—rebuilding on his own terms. Then, around 2016-2017, Netflix came knocking. This time Dave negotiated like a boss: massive paydays—reportedly $20 million per special—full creative control, real ownership. His comeback specials dropped and hit harder than ever. He talked openly about the “dress” incident, the industry’s traps for Black artists, the way they try to break you. In *Sticks & Stones*, he shredded cancel culture. In *The Closer*, he took on the trans debate and refused to bend. The outrage machine came for him full force—walkouts, petitions, headlines screaming “transphobe.” Didn’t matter. Arenas sold out, Grammys won, legacy cemented. And the sweetest part? In 2022, after years of the show being pulled from streaming (Dave had publicly asked platforms not to run it until he got paid fairly), HBO Max finally caved. They cut him a proper check, and Chappelle’s Show came back—with Dave in control. Fast-forward to right now, December 2025: Dave just surprise-dropped his newest Netflix special, The Unstoppable recorded live in his hometown Washington, D.C. back in October. In it, he dives fearless into the chaos of the year—Charlie Kirk’s assassination, Puff Daddy’s downfall, the Riyadh comedy fest backlash, National Guard deployments, free speech crackdowns, and wraps with an epic 30-minute closer weaving American history from Jack Johnson to Nipsey Hussle. Bold truths, no holds barred, and as unstoppable as ever.

Dave Chappelle’s story is one of the rawest examples of what happens when a black genius gets too powerful for the machine to handle—and how he clawed his way out on top. Back in 2003, Chappelle’s Show hit Comedy Central and changed everything. Those sketches—Rick James, Clayton Bigsby, the Racial Draft—weren’t just hilarious; they cut straight through America’s bullshit on race and power. The show blew up, pulling millions of viewers and raking in hundreds of millions from DVDs and reruns. Dave was thirty, suddenly the sharpest voice in comedy. But the deal he’d signed early on gave him almost nothing on the back end. Comedy Central—and its parent Viacom, run by the Redstone family—kept the real money. Dave watched his work get bootlegged and monetized while he got crumbs. Then Season 3 rolled around in 2005. During filming, something felt off. One sketch had a Black character in a pixie costume, and a white executive was laughing a little too hard, in a way that made Dave’s skin crawl. He started telling people privately, “They’re trying to make me wear a dress.” In Hollywood, that’s code for forcing Black men into emasculating roles to diminish their threat—think of the patterns with Eddie Murphy, Martin Lawrence, or countless others. The pressure built. They dangled a $50 million deal for two more seasons. Insane money on paper, but Dave could smell the trap: even less control, more ways to twist his voice into something that served the system instead of exposing it. So he did what almost nobody does—he walked away. Dropped the $50 million, got on a plane, and vanished to South Africa. Stayed on a farm in Durban with a Muslim friend, took a breath, and reflected. The media went feral: “Chappelle’s having a breakdown,” “crack addiction,” “mental health crisis.” Same smear playbook they use on anyone who says no—Kanye, Katt Williams, you name it. Label them crazy, bury the real story. While he was gone, Comedy Central took the unfinished Season 3 footage, slapped it together as “The Lost Episodes,” and aired it anyway. Hosted by Charlie Murphy and Donnell Rawlings, no Dave in sight. They still made bank off his genius, sending a clear message: We own your art even if you run. For years after, Hollywood painted him as difficult, unstable, the guy who “blew” $50 million. Doors quietly closed. No big specials, no major movies. Dave went underground—small clubs, quiet tours—rebuilding on his own terms. Then, around 2016-2017, Netflix came knocking. This time Dave negotiated like a boss: massive paydays—reportedly $20 million per special—full creative control, real ownership. His comeback specials dropped and hit harder than ever. He talked openly about the “dress” incident, the industry’s traps for Black artists, the way they try to break you. In Sticks & Stones, he shredded cancel culture. In The Closer, he took on the trans debate and refused to bend. The outrage machine came for him full force—walkouts, petitions, headlines screaming “transphobe.” Didn’t matter. Arenas sold out, Grammys won, legacy cemented. And the sweetest part? In 2022, after years of the show being pulled from streaming (Dave had publicly asked platforms not to run it until he got paid fairly), HBO Max finally caved. They cut him a proper check, and Chappelle’s Show came back—with Dave in control. Fast-forward to right now, December 2025: Dave just surprise-dropped his newest Netflix special, The Unstoppable recorded live in his hometown Washington, D.C. back in October. In it, he dives fearless into the chaos of the year—Charlie Kirk’s assassination, Puff Daddy’s downfall, the Riyadh comedy fest backlash, National Guard deployments, free speech crackdowns, and wraps with an epic 30-minute closer weaving American history from Jack Johnson to Nipsey Hussle. Bold truths, no holds barred, and as unstoppable as ever.

Lance

95,799 次观看 • 7 个月前

Peter Thiel: world-class entrepreneurs are typically polymaths “I think that one kind of perspective for a lot of the world-class entrepreneurs is that they’re not specialists. They’re something closer to polymaths.” Thiel continues: “If you have a conversation with Mark Zuckerberg, he’d be able to speak with a surprising amount of understanding about a lot of things. He can speak about the details of the Facebook product. He can talk about the way people think about social media — the psychology and the way the culture is shifting. Management of the company, he has ideas on that. He has ideas on how [Facebook] fits into the bigger history of technology.” Thiel then contrasts this to a more typical academic view: “The academic view is that you’re sort of a narrow expert on one thing and that’s what you do. But it’s much more this polymath-like intellect that understands all these different things.” Video source: Dave Rubin Dave RubinShow (2018)

Peter Thiel: world-class entrepreneurs are typically polymaths “I think that one kind of perspective for a lot of the world-class entrepreneurs is that they’re not specialists. They’re something closer to polymaths.” Thiel continues: “If you have a conversation with Mark Zuckerberg, he’d be able to speak with a surprising amount of understanding about a lot of things. He can speak about the details of the Facebook product. He can talk about the way people think about social media — the psychology and the way the culture is shifting. Management of the company, he has ideas on that. He has ideas on how [Facebook] fits into the bigger history of technology.” Thiel then contrasts this to a more typical academic view: “The academic view is that you’re sort of a narrow expert on one thing and that’s what you do. But it’s much more this polymath-like intellect that understands all these different things.” Video source: Dave Rubin Dave RubinShow (2018)

Startup Archive

121,816 次观看 • 6 个月前

🧵 THREAD: Podcastistan, Dave Smith, and the Crisis of Truth After watching the conversation between Dave on the Dave Rubin , Winston Marshall, and James Lindsay (video below), I had to speak up—not just about one man’s words, but about an entire movement’s collapse into something dangerous. 🎙️ The discussion is sparked by a sharp line from Konstantin Kisin (Triggernometry Podcast), who wrote: “Podcastistan is a place where people scold the mainstream media for failing to live up to their standards—while having none of their own.” That’s not just a quip. That’s a warning. This all centers around the recent debate between Douglas Murray and Dave Smith on The Joe Rogan Experience—a debate that revealed more than either of them may have intended. Let me be clear: 🔹 I’d never heard of Dave Smith until Joe Rogan Podcast News featured him. 🔹 I listened with an open mind. 🔹 I gave his views a fair hearing. But as I listened, something felt off. So I applied the Boolean-style truth-testing framework promoted by Dr. Gad Saad —a method rooted in: ✅ Falsifiability ✅ Logical consistency ✅ Empirical evidence ✅ Contextual coherence And the result? 👉 90% of Dave Smith’s arguments fell apart. They were emotionally persuasive—but factually hollow. No citations. No rigor. No truth anchors. Just a rebellious tone masquerading as wisdom. That’s when it hit me: Dave Smith isn’t challenging the establishment. He’s imitating it, wearing the costume of an outsider while pushing unverifiable narratives—no different from corporate media reading off AP wire scripts. In contrast, Douglas Murray came armed with facts, documentation, and a history of due diligence—a point passionately emphasized by James Lindsay in the Rubin interview. “It’s not about expertise—it’s about whether due diligence was done.” – James Lindsay That single phrase reveals the gap. We are now entering an era where truth is tribal and narrative is king. And those who once accused the media of corruption are repeating the same sins—without the excuse of institutional pressure. This is the Postmodern Condition 2.0—and Podcastistan is its capital. It pretends to seek truth. In reality, it replaces evidence with energy, facts with flair. And the result? A generation that distrusts everything except what flatters their worldview. But truth doesn’t belong to the Left or the Right. It belongs to those willing to do the work—to vet, to cite, to challenge, and to think critically, no matter where it leads. I stand with Douglas Murray, James Lindsay, Dr. Gad Saad, and Winston Marshall—those who still believe truth is not subjective, but sacred. And I thank Dave Rubin for giving them the platform to speak this truth. 📽️ Full clip below. Let’s raise the standard again.

🧵 THREAD: Podcastistan, Dave Smith, and the Crisis of Truth After watching the conversation between Dave on the Dave Rubin , Winston Marshall, and James Lindsay (video below), I had to speak up—not just about one man’s words, but about an entire movement’s collapse into something dangerous. 🎙️ The discussion is sparked by a sharp line from Konstantin Kisin (Triggernometry Podcast), who wrote: “Podcastistan is a place where people scold the mainstream media for failing to live up to their standards—while having none of their own.” That’s not just a quip. That’s a warning. This all centers around the recent debate between Douglas Murray and Dave Smith on The Joe Rogan Experience—a debate that revealed more than either of them may have intended. Let me be clear: 🔹 I’d never heard of Dave Smith until Joe Rogan Podcast News featured him. 🔹 I listened with an open mind. 🔹 I gave his views a fair hearing. But as I listened, something felt off. So I applied the Boolean-style truth-testing framework promoted by Dr. Gad Saad —a method rooted in: ✅ Falsifiability ✅ Logical consistency ✅ Empirical evidence ✅ Contextual coherence And the result? 👉 90% of Dave Smith’s arguments fell apart. They were emotionally persuasive—but factually hollow. No citations. No rigor. No truth anchors. Just a rebellious tone masquerading as wisdom. That’s when it hit me: Dave Smith isn’t challenging the establishment. He’s imitating it, wearing the costume of an outsider while pushing unverifiable narratives—no different from corporate media reading off AP wire scripts. In contrast, Douglas Murray came armed with facts, documentation, and a history of due diligence—a point passionately emphasized by James Lindsay in the Rubin interview. “It’s not about expertise—it’s about whether due diligence was done.” – James Lindsay That single phrase reveals the gap. We are now entering an era where truth is tribal and narrative is king. And those who once accused the media of corruption are repeating the same sins—without the excuse of institutional pressure. This is the Postmodern Condition 2.0—and Podcastistan is its capital. It pretends to seek truth. In reality, it replaces evidence with energy, facts with flair. And the result? A generation that distrusts everything except what flatters their worldview. But truth doesn’t belong to the Left or the Right. It belongs to those willing to do the work—to vet, to cite, to challenge, and to think critically, no matter where it leads. I stand with Douglas Murray, James Lindsay, Dr. Gad Saad, and Winston Marshall—those who still believe truth is not subjective, but sacred. And I thank Dave Rubin for giving them the platform to speak this truth. 📽️ Full clip below. Let’s raise the standard again.

Francois Leclerc

69,332 次观看 • 1 年前

Mika x Gata Full Podcast This episode was actually the second podcast I recorded. Gata and the show Dave have been major sources of inspiration for me. Whenever I find myself in a tough spot or face rejection, I think of Gata and Dave’s journey in the show, and it reminds me that it’s all part of the process 01:23 - The Beginning 02:04 - Working On Dave 02:57 - Who Is Gata? 05:10 - Connecting Through Relatability 07:10 - Consistency 12:54 - Falling Off 15:40 - Freedoms Of Crypto 18:12 - Therapeutic 20:10 - Most Emotional Scenes 24:20 - Going Against The Average 29:30 - "Only The Strong Survive" 31:02 - Following The Wrong People 32:35 - Mental Health/ Social Media 35:12 - Ancient Wisdom 36:36 - Believe in YOU 38:05 - Get Busy Living 39:20 - By Yourself 39:50 - Closing Thoughts

Mika x Gata Full Podcast This episode was actually the second podcast I recorded. Gata and the show Dave have been major sources of inspiration for me. Whenever I find myself in a tough spot or face rejection, I think of Gata and Dave’s journey in the show, and it reminds me that it’s all part of the process 01:23 - The Beginning 02:04 - Working On Dave 02:57 - Who Is Gata? 05:10 - Connecting Through Relatability 07:10 - Consistency 12:54 - Falling Off 15:40 - Freedoms Of Crypto 18:12 - Therapeutic 20:10 - Most Emotional Scenes 24:20 - Going Against The Average 29:30 - "Only The Strong Survive" 31:02 - Following The Wrong People 32:35 - Mental Health/ Social Media 35:12 - Ancient Wisdom 36:36 - Believe in YOU 38:05 - Get Busy Living 39:20 - By Yourself 39:50 - Closing Thoughts

Mika

121,890 次观看 • 1 年前

Andrew Kolvet explains to Dave Rubin that the "abhorrent, diabolical, and unprecedented" attacks on Erika Kirk are "demons shrieking in terror for realizing they had screwed up." Just about every person of good faith who appreciated Charlie Kirk felt for Erika, and was rooting for her and TPUSA in the immediate aftermath of the assassination. Some fringe bad actors did not. However, in media appearance after media appearance Erika Kirk and others at TPUSA, including Blake Neff, Andrew Kolvet, Mikey McCoy, and others lied about details that happened leading up to, the day of, and after Charlie being killed. This has caused people to doubt, question, and lose trust in those individuals and the organization at large. Yes, Charlie's death did shine a light on something abhorrent and diabolical. Andrew Kolvet himself contributed to it, and Candace Owens, Megyn Kelly, and Tucker Carlson have been slandered and threatened for daring to bring it up... that is the treatment that Charlie Kirk was receiving from his Zionist donors. They pulled their money, told him that God was going to smite him, called him an antisemite, and labeled him an extremist. The "demons" that I see shrieking are those who were making Charlie's life a living hell in it's last months. Dave Rubin was one of them. What's even worse, and something I cannot understand, is why Erika and those at TPUSA have just continued on with these people. No cutting donors who harrassed him, no firing those who failed to protect him, just Zionist business as usual... They are now even using Charlie to push certain agendas he fought against while he was alive. They claim to be carrying on his legacy, but many see them as trying to hijack or rewrite it. They then turn around and say anyone questioning this or "attacking" Erika for doing so is evil.

Andrew Kolvet explains to Dave Rubin that the "abhorrent, diabolical, and unprecedented" attacks on Erika Kirk are "demons shrieking in terror for realizing they had screwed up." Just about every person of good faith who appreciated Charlie Kirk felt for Erika, and was rooting for her and TPUSA in the immediate aftermath of the assassination. Some fringe bad actors did not. However, in media appearance after media appearance Erika Kirk and others at TPUSA, including Blake Neff, Andrew Kolvet, Mikey McCoy, and others lied about details that happened leading up to, the day of, and after Charlie being killed. This has caused people to doubt, question, and lose trust in those individuals and the organization at large. Yes, Charlie's death did shine a light on something abhorrent and diabolical. Andrew Kolvet himself contributed to it, and Candace Owens, Megyn Kelly, and Tucker Carlson have been slandered and threatened for daring to bring it up... that is the treatment that Charlie Kirk was receiving from his Zionist donors. They pulled their money, told him that God was going to smite him, called him an antisemite, and labeled him an extremist. The "demons" that I see shrieking are those who were making Charlie's life a living hell in it's last months. Dave Rubin was one of them. What's even worse, and something I cannot understand, is why Erika and those at TPUSA have just continued on with these people. No cutting donors who harrassed him, no firing those who failed to protect him, just Zionist business as usual... They are now even using Charlie to push certain agendas he fought against while he was alive. They claim to be carrying on his legacy, but many see them as trying to hijack or rewrite it. They then turn around and say anyone questioning this or "attacking" Erika for doing so is evil.

Zach Costello

34,396 次观看 • 4 个月前

Comedian Dave Chappelle says President Donald Trump has "squandered" his opportunity to unify the country. "The presidency is no place for a petty person," he told PBS News' Amna Nawaz. "Personally, I would say that, you know, anyone in any type of leadership position, or even like a nightclub comedian like me, we have to suffer slights and injuries. We have to kind of just let some things go." Chappelle reflected on his "Saturday Night Live" monologue in January 2025, shortly before Trump's inauguration. Chappelle spoke directly to the camera, telling Trump that "the whole world is counting on you." "Being a president seems like an opportunity to be a very unifying force," he later added. "And I feel like perhaps he squandered that opportunity, to put it lightly." Chappelle spoke with amna for PBS News' podcast, "Settle In." He discussed free speech, the importance of good journalism, his support of public media and why he doesn't regret his decision to perform in Saudi Arabia last year. Listen to the episode here:

Comedian Dave Chappelle says President Donald Trump has "squandered" his opportunity to unify the country. "The presidency is no place for a petty person," he told PBS News' Amna Nawaz. "Personally, I would say that, you know, anyone in any type of leadership position, or even like a nightclub comedian like me, we have to suffer slights and injuries. We have to kind of just let some things go." Chappelle reflected on his "Saturday Night Live" monologue in January 2025, shortly before Trump's inauguration. Chappelle spoke directly to the camera, telling Trump that "the whole world is counting on you." "Being a president seems like an opportunity to be a very unifying force," he later added. "And I feel like perhaps he squandered that opportunity, to put it lightly." Chappelle spoke with amna for PBS News' podcast, "Settle In." He discussed free speech, the importance of good journalism, his support of public media and why he doesn't regret his decision to perform in Saudi Arabia last year. Listen to the episode here:

PBS News

23,864 次观看 • 2 个月前

Warren Buffett provided his view on when the next crash will happen in the latest shareholder meeting Here's what he had to say: "The long-term trend is up. Nobody knows [exactly when it'll happen]. And I certainly don't know... Nobody knows what business is going to do tomorrow, next week, or next month. But they spend all their time talking about it because it's easy to talk about. But it has no value. I'm I've never found anybody I wanted to listen to on the subject and on the other hand I found the leafing through things like that big Japanese book that I can't read anymore that's a treasure hunt and every now and then you find something. And occasionally, very occasionally, but it'll happen again... I don't know when.... it could be next week, it could be five years off, but it won't be 50 years off... We will be bombarded with offerings that we'll be glad we have the cash for. And it'd be a lot more fun if it would happen tomorrow, but it's very unlikely to happen tomorrow. Very, very unlikely to happen tomorrow. But it's not unlikely to happen in five years, and then the probabilities get higher as you go along." Thoughts?

Warren Buffett provided his view on when the next crash will happen in the latest shareholder meeting Here's what he had to say: "The long-term trend is up. Nobody knows [exactly when it'll happen]. And I certainly don't know... Nobody knows what business is going to do tomorrow, next week, or next month. But they spend all their time talking about it because it's easy to talk about. But it has no value. I'm I've never found anybody I wanted to listen to on the subject and on the other hand I found the leafing through things like that big Japanese book that I can't read anymore that's a treasure hunt and every now and then you find something. And occasionally, very occasionally, but it'll happen again... I don't know when.... it could be next week, it could be five years off, but it won't be 50 years off... We will be bombarded with offerings that we'll be glad we have the cash for. And it'd be a lot more fun if it would happen tomorrow, but it's very unlikely to happen tomorrow. Very, very unlikely to happen tomorrow. But it's not unlikely to happen in five years, and then the probabilities get higher as you go along." Thoughts?

Triple Net Investor

50,659 次观看 • 1 年前

IN MY OPINION NOBODY has articulated the CCP moves against the West better than Mr. Miles Guo and the intelligence and wisdom of him are something really special - Once again, Mr. Miles Guo was right about the battle between America and CCP have reached to a new level. Today marks another anniversary of one of the Crypto I truly TRUST, H-Coin and it also reminds me of one of my favorite clips about our potential stablecoin, HDO and I'm looking forward to upcoming great news from Mr. Miles Guo, which I have no doubt that he will share with us at some point. Even though Mr. Miles Guo is still inside, whatever people see or hear on the mainstream media, he knows it too and he understands very well the people who have done terrible things yet still walk free in broad daylight... Over the past few months, I'm glad to see the phenomenal performance shown by our Great Fellow Fighters all over the world, the Alliance, and I’m personally really interested in the messages shared by Sister 摩女peace🌟🌟🌟银河系。新号，小心假号，这个是真的 which I’ve learned so many different types of stories the same as I’ve learned from other Brave Fellow Fighters and Mr. Miles Guo. I can’t wait for the greatest moment of my life, the day Mr. Miles Guo is FREE and the beautiful part is, our G-Series will rise stronger than ever and our NFSC will reach a whole new stage. TIME WILL TELL ALL THE ANSWERS.

IN MY OPINION NOBODY has articulated the CCP moves against the West better than Mr. Miles Guo and the intelligence and wisdom of him are something really special - Once again, Mr. Miles Guo was right about the battle between America and CCP have reached to a new level. Today marks another anniversary of one of the Crypto I truly TRUST, H-Coin and it also reminds me of one of my favorite clips about our potential stablecoin, HDO and I'm looking forward to upcoming great news from Mr. Miles Guo, which I have no doubt that he will share with us at some point. Even though Mr. Miles Guo is still inside, whatever people see or hear on the mainstream media, he knows it too and he understands very well the people who have done terrible things yet still walk free in broad daylight... Over the past few months, I'm glad to see the phenomenal performance shown by our Great Fellow Fighters all over the world, the Alliance, and I’m personally really interested in the messages shared by Sister 摩女peace🌟🌟🌟银河系。新号，小心假号，这个是真的 which I’ve learned so many different types of stories the same as I’ve learned from other Brave Fellow Fighters and Mr. Miles Guo. I can’t wait for the greatest moment of my life, the day Mr. Miles Guo is FREE and the beautiful part is, our G-Series will rise stronger than ever and our NFSC will reach a whole new stage. TIME WILL TELL ALL THE ANSWERS.

Wild Ox

48,463 次观看 • 8 个月前

🚨 NOW: President Trump and First Lady Melania are hosting a STATE DINNER for King Charles and Queen Camilla This is the FIRST white-tie event at the White House in almost 20 YEARS And the guest list is absolutely STACKED 🔥 • Justice Samuel Alito of the Supreme Court of the United States and Mrs. Martha-Ann Alito • Mr. Tobyn Andreae, Director of Communications of the Royal Household • Mr. Marc Andreessen and Ms. Laura Arrillaga-Andreessen • Mr. Bret Baier and Mrs. Amy Baier • The Honorable John Barrasso, United States Senator from Wyoming • Ms. Maria Bartiromo and Mr. Jonathan Steinberg • Mr. Marc Benioff and Mrs. Lynne Benioff • The Honorable Scott Bessent, Secretary of the Treasury and Mr. John Freeman • Mr. Jeff Bezos and Mrs. Lauren Bezos • The Honorable James Blair and Mrs. Samantha Blair • Ms. Senay Bulbul, Minister Counsellor, British Embassy Washington • The Honorable Doug Burgum, Secretary of the Interior and Mrs. Kathryn Burgum • General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff • Mr. Varun Chandra, Prime Minister's Chief Business, Investment and Trade Adviser • Justice Amy Coney Barrett of the Supreme Court of the United States and Mr. Jesse Barrett • Mr. Tim Cook • The Right Honourable Yvette Cooper, Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth, and Development Affairs • The Honorable Steve Daines, United States Senator from Montana • Ms. Sophie Densham, Private Secretary to Her Majesty the Queen • The Honorable Sean Duffy, Secretary of Transportation and Ms. Rachel Campos-Duffy • Ms. Ainsley Earhardt • Mr. David Ellison • Mr. Pepe Fanjul and Mrs. Emilia Fanjul • The Honorable Ed Forst, Administrator of the General Services Administration • Justice Neil Gorsuch of the Supreme Court of the United States and Mrs. Marie Louise Gorsuch • The Honorable Lindsey Graham, United States Senator from South Carolina • The Honorable Jamieson Greer, United States Trade Representative and Mrs. Marlo Greer • Mr. Greg Gutfeld and Ms. Elena Mussa • The Honorable Beau Harrison and The Honorable Hayley Harrison • The Honorable Pete Hegseth, Secretary of War and Mrs. Jennifer Hegseth • Mr. Jensen Huang and Mrs. Lori Huang • Ms. Caroline Hurndall, Principal Private Secretary to the Foreign Secretary • Ms. Laura Ingraham • Mr. Otis Irwin • The Honorable Mike Johnson, Speaker of the House of Representatives and Mrs. Kelly Johnson • Ms. Tham Kannalikham • Justice Brett Kavanaugh of the Supreme Court of the United States and Mrs. Ashley Kavanaugh • Mr. Howard Kessler and Mrs. Michele Kessler • Mr. Viktor Knavs • Mr. Robert Kraft and Dr. Dana Kraft • Mr. Harry Lopes • Mr. Juan Luciano • The Honorable Howard Lutnick, Secretary of Commerce and Mrs. Allison Lutnick • Mr. Rory McIlroy and Mrs. Erica McIlroy • The Honorable Stephen Miller and Mrs. Katie Miller • Mr. Brendan Nelson • Ms. Meg O’Neill • Mr. John Paulson and Ms. Alina de Almeida • Mr. Isaac Perlmutter and Mrs. Laura Perlmutter • Mr. Hervé Pierre • Mr. Keith Poole • Ms. Ruth Porat • The Honorable Dina Powell McCormick and The Honorable Dave McCormick, United States Senator from Pennsylvania • Mr. Anthony Pratt and Ms. Claudine Revere • Mr. Adam Riddle • The Honorable Jim Risch, United States Senator from Idaho and Mrs. Vicki Risch • Mr. Don Robert • Chief Justice John Roberts of the Supreme Court of the United States and Mrs. Jane Roberts • The Honorable John F.W. Rogers • Mr. James Roscoe, Deputy Head of Mission, British Embassy Washington • The Honorable Marco Rubio, Secretary of State and Mrs. Jeanette Rubio • Mr. Christopher Ruddy • Mr. Theo Rycroft, Deputy Private Secretary to His Majesty the King • The Honorable Dan Scavino and Mrs. Erin Scavino • Mr. Steve Schwarzman and Mrs. Christine Schwarzman • Mrs. Suzanne Scott • Mr. Brian Sikes • The Honorable Warren Stephens, American Ambassador to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and Mrs. Harriet Stephens • Justice Clarence Thomas of the Supreme Court of the United States and Mrs. Virginia Thomas • Lieutenant Colonel Jonny Thompson, Senior Equerry to His Majesty the King • The Honorable John Thune, United States Senator from South Dakota and Mrs. Kimberley Thune • Mr. Eric Trump and Mrs. Lara Trump • The Honorable Ivanka Trump and The Honorable Jared Kushner • Ms. Tiffany Trump and Mr. Michael Boulos • Sir Christian Turner, His Majesty's Ambassador to the United States of America, and Lady Claire Turner • The Vice President of the United States, JD Vance and Mrs. Usha Vance • Mr. C.S. Venkatakrishnan • Mr. Jesse Watters and Mrs. Emma Watters • The Honorable Steve Witkoff, Special Envoy to the Middle East and Ms. Lauren Olaya

🚨 NOW: President Trump and First Lady Melania are hosting a STATE DINNER for King Charles and Queen Camilla This is the FIRST white-tie event at the White House in almost 20 YEARS And the guest list is absolutely STACKED 🔥 • Justice Samuel Alito of the Supreme Court of the United States and Mrs. Martha-Ann Alito • Mr. Tobyn Andreae, Director of Communications of the Royal Household • Mr. Marc Andreessen and Ms. Laura Arrillaga-Andreessen • Mr. Bret Baier and Mrs. Amy Baier • The Honorable John Barrasso, United States Senator from Wyoming • Ms. Maria Bartiromo and Mr. Jonathan Steinberg • Mr. Marc Benioff and Mrs. Lynne Benioff • The Honorable Scott Bessent, Secretary of the Treasury and Mr. John Freeman • Mr. Jeff Bezos and Mrs. Lauren Bezos • The Honorable James Blair and Mrs. Samantha Blair • Ms. Senay Bulbul, Minister Counsellor, British Embassy Washington • The Honorable Doug Burgum, Secretary of the Interior and Mrs. Kathryn Burgum • General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff • Mr. Varun Chandra, Prime Minister's Chief Business, Investment and Trade Adviser • Justice Amy Coney Barrett of the Supreme Court of the United States and Mr. Jesse Barrett • Mr. Tim Cook • The Right Honourable Yvette Cooper, Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth, and Development Affairs • The Honorable Steve Daines, United States Senator from Montana • Ms. Sophie Densham, Private Secretary to Her Majesty the Queen • The Honorable Sean Duffy, Secretary of Transportation and Ms. Rachel Campos-Duffy • Ms. Ainsley Earhardt • Mr. David Ellison • Mr. Pepe Fanjul and Mrs. Emilia Fanjul • The Honorable Ed Forst, Administrator of the General Services Administration • Justice Neil Gorsuch of the Supreme Court of the United States and Mrs. Marie Louise Gorsuch • The Honorable Lindsey Graham, United States Senator from South Carolina • The Honorable Jamieson Greer, United States Trade Representative and Mrs. Marlo Greer • Mr. Greg Gutfeld and Ms. Elena Mussa • The Honorable Beau Harrison and The Honorable Hayley Harrison • The Honorable Pete Hegseth, Secretary of War and Mrs. Jennifer Hegseth • Mr. Jensen Huang and Mrs. Lori Huang • Ms. Caroline Hurndall, Principal Private Secretary to the Foreign Secretary • Ms. Laura Ingraham • Mr. Otis Irwin • The Honorable Mike Johnson, Speaker of the House of Representatives and Mrs. Kelly Johnson • Ms. Tham Kannalikham • Justice Brett Kavanaugh of the Supreme Court of the United States and Mrs. Ashley Kavanaugh • Mr. Howard Kessler and Mrs. Michele Kessler • Mr. Viktor Knavs • Mr. Robert Kraft and Dr. Dana Kraft • Mr. Harry Lopes • Mr. Juan Luciano • The Honorable Howard Lutnick, Secretary of Commerce and Mrs. Allison Lutnick • Mr. Rory McIlroy and Mrs. Erica McIlroy • The Honorable Stephen Miller and Mrs. Katie Miller • Mr. Brendan Nelson • Ms. Meg O’Neill • Mr. John Paulson and Ms. Alina de Almeida • Mr. Isaac Perlmutter and Mrs. Laura Perlmutter • Mr. Hervé Pierre • Mr. Keith Poole • Ms. Ruth Porat • The Honorable Dina Powell McCormick and The Honorable Dave McCormick, United States Senator from Pennsylvania • Mr. Anthony Pratt and Ms. Claudine Revere • Mr. Adam Riddle • The Honorable Jim Risch, United States Senator from Idaho and Mrs. Vicki Risch • Mr. Don Robert • Chief Justice John Roberts of the Supreme Court of the United States and Mrs. Jane Roberts • The Honorable John F.W. Rogers • Mr. James Roscoe, Deputy Head of Mission, British Embassy Washington • The Honorable Marco Rubio, Secretary of State and Mrs. Jeanette Rubio • Mr. Christopher Ruddy • Mr. Theo Rycroft, Deputy Private Secretary to His Majesty the King • The Honorable Dan Scavino and Mrs. Erin Scavino • Mr. Steve Schwarzman and Mrs. Christine Schwarzman • Mrs. Suzanne Scott • Mr. Brian Sikes • The Honorable Warren Stephens, American Ambassador to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and Mrs. Harriet Stephens • Justice Clarence Thomas of the Supreme Court of the United States and Mrs. Virginia Thomas • Lieutenant Colonel Jonny Thompson, Senior Equerry to His Majesty the King • The Honorable John Thune, United States Senator from South Dakota and Mrs. Kimberley Thune • Mr. Eric Trump and Mrs. Lara Trump • The Honorable Ivanka Trump and The Honorable Jared Kushner • Ms. Tiffany Trump and Mr. Michael Boulos • Sir Christian Turner, His Majesty's Ambassador to the United States of America, and Lady Claire Turner • The Vice President of the United States, JD Vance and Mrs. Usha Vance • Mr. C.S. Venkatakrishnan • Mr. Jesse Watters and Mrs. Emma Watters • The Honorable Steve Witkoff, Special Envoy to the Middle East and Ms. Lauren Olaya

Nick Sortor

679,887 次观看 • 2 个月前

Senators Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, Chuck Schumer, and others continue to support Democratic senatorial candidate Graham Platner, despite comments he made that offended feminist Democrats and an accusation of violence by a former girlfriend. “Look, he has apologized for that,” said Warren, referring to Platner’s comments on social media in 2013. In response to a Reddit post titled “shorts that prevent you from being raped,” Platner had written, “how about people just take some responsibility for themselves and not get so f----ed up they wind up having sex with someone they don’t mean to?” At the same time, all four Senators refused to confirm Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court after a woman alleged that he had tried to sexually assault her while they were in high school. Warren opposed the nomination, citing “credible allegations” of sexual assault. “I listened to Dr. Ford, and I listened to Judge Kavanaugh,” said Sanders. “I believe Dr. Ford.” Said Schumer, “For too long, when women have made serious allegations of abuse, they have been ignored. That cannot happen in this case.” And yet that’s precisely what Schumer has done in the case of Platner. Some may object that the charge against Kavanaugh was more serious, but it was no more credible than the ones against Platner. An ex-girlfriend, Lindsey Fifield, said Platner “regularly grabbed her by the shoulders,” reported the New York Times, “sometimes hard enough to leave marks — and, on one occasion, yanked her out of a cab by her wrist after an argument when she wanted to stay in the car. During one argument, she recalled, he twisted her arm behind her back, shoved her into a bedroom and held the door closed from the other side so she couldn’t get out, telling her to remain there until she was ‘calm.’” Fitfield’s accusation is difficult, if not impossible, to prove, and the same can be said of Ford’s. None of the individuals whom Ford said were at the party, including her lifelong friends, corroborated her account, and one told the Senate she had no memory of it. And a different man told Senate investigators that he was the man who assaulted Ford, not Kavanaugh. Moreover, there is evidence of Platner misrepresenting the truth. For example, he denied he had a serious relationship with his accuser, but the Times’ reporters said they saw a text he sent her in 2016, which read, “Lyndsey, I love you in a way I can’t even describe. “You are literally everything to me.” Platner denied knowing that a tattoo on his chest was the symbol of a Nazi death squad, but last August, “months before Mr. Platner acknowledged the tattoo himself,” noted the Times, “Ms. Fifield told friends that her ex-boyfriend-turned-Senate candidate ‘has a Nazi tattoo on his chest.’ ‘It’s a Totenkopf,’ she told them on Aug. 20, according to a screenshot she shared with The Times. ‘An actual one.’” And Platner said he was treated in 2016 for PTSD, one of whose symptoms is uncontrolled anger and “hyperarousal and reactivity,” which is the feeling of being constantly on the lookout for danger. Platner’s campaign team did not deny Fitfield’s accusation that he fantasized about someone breaking into his home so he could rape them. “Asked about those remarks, a Platner campaign official did not dispute them,” noted the Times. For years, Democrats have accused their political opponents, particularly Donald Trump, of being Nazis, rapists, or soft on Nazis and violence against women. And yet here Democrats are supporting a person facing credible accusations of being sympathetic to Nazism, and accusations of violence that are no less credible than the ones Sanders, Warren, Schumer, and others made against Kavanaugh. While one interpretation of the remarks and positions taken by Sanders, Warren, and Schumer toward Platner is that they are hypocrites putting ends-justify-the-means politics before principles. At the same time, the difference in reactions to Franken and Platner shows that accusations of sexual harassment have less salience today than in 2017. Back then, Senate Democrats did not defend Democratic Senator Al Franken after he was accused of sexual harassment, even though some progressives later said the evidence for it was weak, as they have done with Platner. Meanwhile, the accusations against Platner do not appear to have changed the minds of many Democrats on social media nor among many voters in Maine. And even a Republican strategist told Jesse Watters on Friday that the allegations were unlikely to change the minds of many swing voters. What changed? Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video!

Senators Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, Chuck Schumer, and others continue to support Democratic senatorial candidate Graham Platner, despite comments he made that offended feminist Democrats and an accusation of violence by a former girlfriend. “Look, he has apologized for that,” said Warren, referring to Platner’s comments on social media in 2013. In response to a Reddit post titled “shorts that prevent you from being raped,” Platner had written, “how about people just take some responsibility for themselves and not get so f----ed up they wind up having sex with someone they don’t mean to?” At the same time, all four Senators refused to confirm Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court after a woman alleged that he had tried to sexually assault her while they were in high school. Warren opposed the nomination, citing “credible allegations” of sexual assault. “I listened to Dr. Ford, and I listened to Judge Kavanaugh,” said Sanders. “I believe Dr. Ford.” Said Schumer, “For too long, when women have made serious allegations of abuse, they have been ignored. That cannot happen in this case.” And yet that’s precisely what Schumer has done in the case of Platner. Some may object that the charge against Kavanaugh was more serious, but it was no more credible than the ones against Platner. An ex-girlfriend, Lindsey Fifield, said Platner “regularly grabbed her by the shoulders,” reported the New York Times, “sometimes hard enough to leave marks — and, on one occasion, yanked her out of a cab by her wrist after an argument when she wanted to stay in the car. During one argument, she recalled, he twisted her arm behind her back, shoved her into a bedroom and held the door closed from the other side so she couldn’t get out, telling her to remain there until she was ‘calm.’” Fitfield’s accusation is difficult, if not impossible, to prove, and the same can be said of Ford’s. None of the individuals whom Ford said were at the party, including her lifelong friends, corroborated her account, and one told the Senate she had no memory of it. And a different man told Senate investigators that he was the man who assaulted Ford, not Kavanaugh. Moreover, there is evidence of Platner misrepresenting the truth. For example, he denied he had a serious relationship with his accuser, but the Times’ reporters said they saw a text he sent her in 2016, which read, “Lyndsey, I love you in a way I can’t even describe. “You are literally everything to me.” Platner denied knowing that a tattoo on his chest was the symbol of a Nazi death squad, but last August, “months before Mr. Platner acknowledged the tattoo himself,” noted the Times, “Ms. Fifield told friends that her ex-boyfriend-turned-Senate candidate ‘has a Nazi tattoo on his chest.’ ‘It’s a Totenkopf,’ she told them on Aug. 20, according to a screenshot she shared with The Times. ‘An actual one.’” And Platner said he was treated in 2016 for PTSD, one of whose symptoms is uncontrolled anger and “hyperarousal and reactivity,” which is the feeling of being constantly on the lookout for danger. Platner’s campaign team did not deny Fitfield’s accusation that he fantasized about someone breaking into his home so he could rape them. “Asked about those remarks, a Platner campaign official did not dispute them,” noted the Times. For years, Democrats have accused their political opponents, particularly Donald Trump, of being Nazis, rapists, or soft on Nazis and violence against women. And yet here Democrats are supporting a person facing credible accusations of being sympathetic to Nazism, and accusations of violence that are no less credible than the ones Sanders, Warren, Schumer, and others made against Kavanaugh. While one interpretation of the remarks and positions taken by Sanders, Warren, and Schumer toward Platner is that they are hypocrites putting ends-justify-the-means politics before principles. At the same time, the difference in reactions to Franken and Platner shows that accusations of sexual harassment have less salience today than in 2017. Back then, Senate Democrats did not defend Democratic Senator Al Franken after he was accused of sexual harassment, even though some progressives later said the evidence for it was weak, as they have done with Platner. Meanwhile, the accusations against Platner do not appear to have changed the minds of many Democrats on social media nor among many voters in Maine. And even a Republican strategist told Jesse Watters on Friday that the allegations were unlikely to change the minds of many swing voters. What changed? Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video!

Michael Shellenberger

40,845 次观看 • 1 个月前