Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Muhammad commanded DIRECT violence against Christians and non-believers. 123 Quran explicit commands to attack those resisting Islam, including stab them in the neck. That’s why so many UK Islamic attacks involve neck stabbings Isn’t ancient history, it’s still being followed

Jason

20,612 subscribers

35,506 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Wow, who knew? Muhammad drops 123 violence tips in the Quran, especially for Christians—neck stabs for fun (Quran 8:12). Shocking how UK extremists follow the script. Syria's Christian pop: 2M in 2010 to under 500K now. But hey, it's all "context" and "peace," folks. Snort.

Wow, who knew? Muhammad drops 123 violence tips in the Quran, especially for Christians—neck stabs for fun (Quran 8:12). Shocking how UK extremists follow the script. Syria's Christian pop: 2M in 2010 to under 500K now. But hey, it's all "context" and "peace," folks. Snort.

Islam Invasion 🚨

151,517 次观看 • 1 年前

Yoruba Islamic Cleric Declares War On Non-Muslims In Yorubaland, Says “It Is Rooted In Islam As Commanded By Allah In The Quran” “Allah said fight them, enslave them, lock them inside their homes, don’t let them see the sun. It’s the Muslim who has the right to enslave the kafir, not the other way around. Anywhere you find them hiding, seal them. That’s what Allah said in the Quran. It’s always first attack. War against kafir is rooted in Islam.”

Yoruba Islamic Cleric Declares War On Non-Muslims In Yorubaland, Says “It Is Rooted In Islam As Commanded By Allah In The Quran” “Allah said fight them, enslave them, lock them inside their homes, don’t let them see the sun. It’s the Muslim who has the right to enslave the kafir, not the other way around. Anywhere you find them hiding, seal them. That’s what Allah said in the Quran. It’s always first attack. War against kafir is rooted in Islam.”

The Yoruba Times

66,788 次观看 • 25 天前

Saleem Wastik, a prominent ex-Muslim critic of Islam, the Quran, and Prophet Muhammad, has long exposed what he describes as problematic teachings. He translated and highlighted numerous verses and hadiths that he claims promote violence against women, animals, and non-believers. After leaving Islam, he underwent ghar wapsi and became an outspoken advocate against radical Islamic ideologies. Today he was brutally stabbed by islamists in Delhi. He sustained severe injuries and is currently in critical condition, admitted to GTB Hospital.

Saleem Wastik, a prominent ex-Muslim critic of Islam, the Quran, and Prophet Muhammad, has long exposed what he describes as problematic teachings. He translated and highlighted numerous verses and hadiths that he claims promote violence against women, animals, and non-believers. After leaving Islam, he underwent ghar wapsi and became an outspoken advocate against radical Islamic ideologies. Today he was brutally stabbed by islamists in Delhi. He sustained severe injuries and is currently in critical condition, admitted to GTB Hospital.

Hindutva Knight

321,741 次观看 • 6 个月前

In this powerful interview, a former F-15 pilot and congressman who began studying Islam after flying on 9/11 explains why he believes no devout Muslim should serve in the U.S. military. He breaks down core Islamic teachings from the Quran, Hadith, and Sira, including the doctrine of Taqiyya (permissible lying to non-believers), and argues that true believers are commanded to kill or subjugate non-Muslims. He also shares alarming terrorism statistics from the Department of Justice showing a massive spike in radical Islamic attacks since 2000, and criticizes the appointment of Muslims to key security positions. A must-watch for anyone concerned about national security and Islamic ideology in America. Less we forget... Amy Mek Clay Edwards Sippi Cup Chris Hinkle Rob Maness LTC Larry Brock (ret.), Host of The Reckoning

In this powerful interview, a former F-15 pilot and congressman who began studying Islam after flying on 9/11 explains why he believes no devout Muslim should serve in the U.S. military. He breaks down core Islamic teachings from the Quran, Hadith, and Sira, including the doctrine of Taqiyya (permissible lying to non-believers), and argues that true believers are commanded to kill or subjugate non-Muslims. He also shares alarming terrorism statistics from the Department of Justice showing a massive spike in radical Islamic attacks since 2000, and criticizes the appointment of Muslims to key security positions. A must-watch for anyone concerned about national security and Islamic ideology in America. Less we forget... Amy Mek Clay Edwards Sippi Cup Chris Hinkle Rob Maness LTC Larry Brock (ret.), Host of The Reckoning

Andrew Gasser ن

186,694 次观看 • 10 天前

Islam start the war against the west 1,400 years ago, their main target was to conquer Jerusalem, constantinople and India and to eliminate the Jews, Christians, Hindus and their holy sites, their religions, their culture and their history, and that Islam will be the only religion left in the world and the world will rule by Muslims under Islamic laws Muslims still and will be at war against all the Non-Muslims, until this mission is accomplished, this is their “Divine” command from the Quran

Islam start the war against the west 1,400 years ago, their main target was to conquer Jerusalem, constantinople and India and to eliminate the Jews, Christians, Hindus and their holy sites, their religions, their culture and their history, and that Islam will be the only religion left in the world and the world will rule by Muslims under Islamic laws Muslims still and will be at war against all the Non-Muslims, until this mission is accomplished, this is their “Divine” command from the Quran

Bob

297,979 次观看 • 1 年前

We shouldn’t be surprised by this nutcase loving ISIS and planning to kill people in the UK. It is absolutely to be expected. 23% of British Muslims support Sharia Law. That’s not the % of Muslims in the UK… that’s ones with British passports! Foreign born Muslims will be much higher. At 23%, that’s 1,380,000 people in the UK who want Sharia. 32% agree with violence against those who mock Muhammad. That’s 2,100,000 people in the UK who believe in violence for blasphemy against Islam. 66% would not report someone to the Police if they knew they were planning a terror attack. When people tell you why they hate you… we should really listen! Trevor Phillips uncovered all of this for a Channel 4 documentary 10 years ago. Things have only got worse since then. Full stats here:

We shouldn’t be surprised by this nutcase loving ISIS and planning to kill people in the UK. It is absolutely to be expected. 23% of British Muslims support Sharia Law. That’s not the % of Muslims in the UK… that’s ones with British passports! Foreign born Muslims will be much higher. At 23%, that’s 1,380,000 people in the UK who want Sharia. 32% agree with violence against those who mock Muhammad. That’s 2,100,000 people in the UK who believe in violence for blasphemy against Islam. 66% would not report someone to the Police if they knew they were planning a terror attack. When people tell you why they hate you… we should really listen! Trevor Phillips uncovered all of this for a Channel 4 documentary 10 years ago. Things have only got worse since then. Full stats here:

Mike Hacks

27,187 次观看 • 6 个月前

Muslim clerics in Britain openly admit they are in a “ceasefire” simply waiting for the right moment. Scholars of Islamist doctrine have been warning for years: The world is divided into two houses the Land of Islam and the Land of War. Muslims are commanded to wage Jihad against non-Muslims until the entire world becomes the Land of Islam. This is not ancient history. This is being taught and believed right now, in Britain. How much longer will the West continue to ignore this ideology and pretend it’s compatible with our civilization?

Muslim clerics in Britain openly admit they are in a “ceasefire” simply waiting for the right moment. Scholars of Islamist doctrine have been warning for years: The world is divided into two houses the Land of Islam and the Land of War. Muslims are commanded to wage Jihad against non-Muslims until the entire world becomes the Land of Islam. This is not ancient history. This is being taught and believed right now, in Britain. How much longer will the West continue to ignore this ideology and pretend it’s compatible with our civilization?

Yossi BenYakar

38,611 次观看 • 4 个月前

The Quran NEVER Calls Christians “Infidels” – Here’s the Clear Truth Christians are never referred to as infidels in the Holy Quran. Not once. Not a single verse. The “infidels” the Quran actually mentions were the pagan Arabs of Mecca, the very people who turned against the first Muslims and tried to wipe them out in their own city. This wasn’t a global command for war or Muslim domination of the world. It was strictly about self defence in those specific early battles when the Muslims were fighting for survival against betrayal by their own people. Now here’s what changes everything: When the Prophet Muhammad feared for the lives of the very first Muslims, he didn’t send them to another Muslim tribe for safety. Instead, he sent them to Christian Abyssinia (modern-day Ethiopia), where a righteous Christian king, the Najashi, welcomed and protected them. If Islam truly taught hatred or killing of Christians, why would the Prophet send his most vulnerable followers to a Christian kingdom during the most dangerous time in early Islamic history? It simply doesn’t make sense. So the real question we all need to ask is: If the Prophet never hated Christians… where did all this modern-day hatred actually come from?

The Quran NEVER Calls Christians “Infidels” – Here’s the Clear Truth Christians are never referred to as infidels in the Holy Quran. Not once. Not a single verse. The “infidels” the Quran actually mentions were the pagan Arabs of Mecca, the very people who turned against the first Muslims and tried to wipe them out in their own city. This wasn’t a global command for war or Muslim domination of the world. It was strictly about self defence in those specific early battles when the Muslims were fighting for survival against betrayal by their own people. Now here’s what changes everything: When the Prophet Muhammad feared for the lives of the very first Muslims, he didn’t send them to another Muslim tribe for safety. Instead, he sent them to Christian Abyssinia (modern-day Ethiopia), where a righteous Christian king, the Najashi, welcomed and protected them. If Islam truly taught hatred or killing of Christians, why would the Prophet send his most vulnerable followers to a Christian kingdom during the most dangerous time in early Islamic history? It simply doesn’t make sense. So the real question we all need to ask is: If the Prophet never hated Christians… where did all this modern-day hatred actually come from?

Maliq

101,079 次观看 • 5 个月前

I'm recommending to all you non-Muslims out there, no matter who you are or where you're from, to read this post, study it in depth, and check out the two posts in the comments before you decide it's a smart move to side with the Islamic Ummah, which is Islam and the Muslims, on any issue whatsoever. Quran 98:6 "Verily, those who disbelieve (in the religion of Islâm, the Qur’ân and Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم) from among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) and Al-Mushrikûn will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of creatures." Quran 7:179 "And We have certainly created for Hell many of the jinn and mankind. They have hearts with which they do not understand, they have eyes with which they do not see, and they have ears with which they do not hear. Those are like cattle; rather, they are more astray. It is they who are the heedless." Quran 8.39 "...fight them until disbelief (non-Muslims) disappears and the whole Dean (way of life) is for Allah alone...(for Islam)” Quran 9.5 “...kill the Mushrikun (non-Muslims) wherever you find them…" Al-Bukhari: "To wage war against Allah means to reject faith in Him." Quran 2.191 "The sin of disbelief in Allah is greater than committing murder."

I'm recommending to all you non-Muslims out there, no matter who you are or where you're from, to read this post, study it in depth, and check out the two posts in the comments before you decide it's a smart move to side with the Islamic Ummah, which is Islam and the Muslims, on any issue whatsoever. Quran 98:6 "Verily, those who disbelieve (in the religion of Islâm, the Qur’ân and Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم) from among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) and Al-Mushrikûn will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of creatures." Quran 7:179 "And We have certainly created for Hell many of the jinn and mankind. They have hearts with which they do not understand, they have eyes with which they do not see, and they have ears with which they do not hear. Those are like cattle; rather, they are more astray. It is they who are the heedless." Quran 8.39 "...fight them until disbelief (non-Muslims) disappears and the whole Dean (way of life) is for Allah alone...(for Islam)” Quran 9.5 “...kill the Mushrikun (non-Muslims) wherever you find them…" Al-Bukhari: "To wage war against Allah means to reject faith in Him." Quran 2.191 "The sin of disbelief in Allah is greater than committing murder."

Ofer Binshtok - Kafir - עופר בינשטוק

171,570 次观看 • 4 个月前

I asked Rep. Chip Roy Press Office why the U.S. still hasn’t designated the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization when Saudi Arabia and the UAE designated the MB YEARS AGO! He said it’s time to stop pretending there isn’t a war. He compared the threat of Islam today to the one Thomas Jefferson and John Adams faced when they fought the Barbary pirates, saying it’s the same ideology we’re up against now. The Founding Fathers themselves knew that Islam was opposed to Western Civilization. That’s why Jefferson studied the Quran: so he could understand his enemy. The Islamic enemy. The Muslim Brotherhood knows it can’t beat us from the outside, so it’s trying to destroy America from within.

I asked Rep. Chip Roy Press Office why the U.S. still hasn’t designated the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization when Saudi Arabia and the UAE designated the MB YEARS AGO! He said it’s time to stop pretending there isn’t a war. He compared the threat of Islam today to the one Thomas Jefferson and John Adams faced when they fought the Barbary pirates, saying it’s the same ideology we’re up against now. The Founding Fathers themselves knew that Islam was opposed to Western Civilization. That’s why Jefferson studied the Quran: so he could understand his enemy. The Islamic enemy. The Muslim Brotherhood knows it can’t beat us from the outside, so it’s trying to destroy America from within.

Laura Loomer

90,140 次观看 • 10 个月前

They are sending a message.... MUSLIMS MATTER. CHRISTIANS DON'T. I take serious exception to taxpayer-funded police and politicians promoting Ramadan and other foreign religious festivals in our country while Christianity is sidelined. It needs to stop. Now. This is why I want to officialise Christianity as New Zealand’s founding religion. Our nation was built on Christian values…not imported ideologies that conflict with them. Why are government officials so quick to publicly celebrate Islam, yet so reluctant to openly affirm Easter and Christmas? This is in the wake of some unspeakable tragedies from Islamic extremists against Jews & Christians across the world... 🔹 Bondi massacre from Islamic shooters 🔹 Manchester Synagogue Attack from Islamic terrorists 🔹 Tens of thousands of Christians killed in Nigeria by Islamic extremists 🔹 Islamic Rape gangs in UK targeting British girls 🔹 Plus many more Islamic extremists actively seek to kill Christians and all infidels (non-Muslim). That’s most Kiwis. Why would we import our own demise? Remember our haka on Queen Street last year tearing up flags. We made a statement. We boldly declared this is a Christian nation, and foreign religions are not welcome here. Those haka videos went viral across the world. Over 100 million views. Shared time and time again by large influencers impressed with how NZers are stating we are a Christian nation, and Islam is not welcome here. We sent an unapologetic message to the world. And even now, those videos continue to circulate. Islam is not compatiable with our Kiwi Christian values. The evidence is undeniable. And instead of acknowledging this, NZ officials are doubling down – attempting to correct the great perception of NZ that we did a damn good job of spreading across the world. This is serious. It needs to stop NOW!

They are sending a message.... MUSLIMS MATTER. CHRISTIANS DON'T. I take serious exception to taxpayer-funded police and politicians promoting Ramadan and other foreign religious festivals in our country while Christianity is sidelined. It needs to stop. Now. This is why I want to officialise Christianity as New Zealand’s founding religion. Our nation was built on Christian values…not imported ideologies that conflict with them. Why are government officials so quick to publicly celebrate Islam, yet so reluctant to openly affirm Easter and Christmas? This is in the wake of some unspeakable tragedies from Islamic extremists against Jews & Christians across the world... 🔹 Bondi massacre from Islamic shooters 🔹 Manchester Synagogue Attack from Islamic terrorists 🔹 Tens of thousands of Christians killed in Nigeria by Islamic extremists 🔹 Islamic Rape gangs in UK targeting British girls 🔹 Plus many more Islamic extremists actively seek to kill Christians and all infidels (non-Muslim). That’s most Kiwis. Why would we import our own demise? Remember our haka on Queen Street last year tearing up flags. We made a statement. We boldly declared this is a Christian nation, and foreign religions are not welcome here. Those haka videos went viral across the world. Over 100 million views. Shared time and time again by large influencers impressed with how NZers are stating we are a Christian nation, and Islam is not welcome here. We sent an unapologetic message to the world. And even now, those videos continue to circulate. Islam is not compatiable with our Kiwi Christian values. The evidence is undeniable. And instead of acknowledging this, NZ officials are doubling down – attempting to correct the great perception of NZ that we did a damn good job of spreading across the world. This is serious. It needs to stop NOW!

Brian Tamaki

11,113 次观看 • 6 个月前

Islamized UK: Christians Forced to Submit Britain has fallen. A woman was arrested - not for violence, not for incitement — but for asking a dawah stall to stop blasting Qur’an verses over a loudspeaker in public. Think about that: a Christian woman silenced and cuffed, while verses calling for death to Christians, Jews, Hindus, atheists, and gays are amplified with police protection. If that isn’t surrender, what is? The real hate speech isn’t in her objection — it’s in the Qur’an itself. Black and white commands to fight unbelievers until they submit, convert, or pay the humiliating jizya tax. That’s not “tolerance.” That’s domination. And make no mistake — dawah isn’t harmless “outreach.” It’s the opening move of jihad. Islamic law is explicit: invite first, then wage war. Reliance of the Traveller, approved by Al-Azhar, spells it out: “The caliph makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians provided he has first invited them to enter Islam… and the war continues until they become Muslim or else pay the poll tax.” This is the playbook. First comes dawah. Then comes jihad. Meanwhile, in Muslim countries, Bibles are banned, missionaries jailed, and evangelism outlawed. But in the UK, Islam is broadcast on loudspeakers while Christians are arrested for objecting. “Tolerance” only ever flows one way. This isn’t law enforcement. This is blasphemy law by another name. Britain has traded its Christian roots for Sharia submission. And unless people wake up, the rest of the West is next. Meanwhile, a UK-based jihadi media site that dreams of a caliphate has already piled on—smearing this woman and celebrating her arrest. That’s the script: crush the dissenter, bless the jihad loudspeaker, and rebrand surrender as “tolerance.”

Islamized UK: Christians Forced to Submit Britain has fallen. A woman was arrested - not for violence, not for incitement — but for asking a dawah stall to stop blasting Qur’an verses over a loudspeaker in public. Think about that: a Christian woman silenced and cuffed, while verses calling for death to Christians, Jews, Hindus, atheists, and gays are amplified with police protection. If that isn’t surrender, what is? The real hate speech isn’t in her objection — it’s in the Qur’an itself. Black and white commands to fight unbelievers until they submit, convert, or pay the humiliating jizya tax. That’s not “tolerance.” That’s domination. And make no mistake — dawah isn’t harmless “outreach.” It’s the opening move of jihad. Islamic law is explicit: invite first, then wage war. Reliance of the Traveller, approved by Al-Azhar, spells it out: “The caliph makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians provided he has first invited them to enter Islam… and the war continues until they become Muslim or else pay the poll tax.” This is the playbook. First comes dawah. Then comes jihad. Meanwhile, in Muslim countries, Bibles are banned, missionaries jailed, and evangelism outlawed. But in the UK, Islam is broadcast on loudspeakers while Christians are arrested for objecting. “Tolerance” only ever flows one way. This isn’t law enforcement. This is blasphemy law by another name. Britain has traded its Christian roots for Sharia submission. And unless people wake up, the rest of the West is next. Meanwhile, a UK-based jihadi media site that dreams of a caliphate has already piled on—smearing this woman and celebrating her arrest. That’s the script: crush the dissenter, bless the jihad loudspeaker, and rebrand surrender as “tolerance.”

Amy Mek

23,436 次观看 • 11 个月前

THE QURAN COMMANDS VIOLENCE On Episode 70 of Going Rogue with Lara Logan, UK journalist and political activist Tommy Robinson sits down with Lara to discuss the ideology he believes drives extremist groups like ISIS and Boko Haram. Robinson points to statements made by terrorist organizations themselves, including ISIS and Boko Haram, who have publicly claimed religious justification for kidnappings, slavery, and attacks against civilians. He argues that many Western leaders and institutions avoid confronting the ideological motivations cited by these groups, which he believes prevents an honest conversation about the roots of radicalization. The discussion also explores how extremists interpret religious texts, the concept of abrogation in Islamic scholarship, and why Robinson says understanding these ideological frameworks is critical to confronting global jihadist movements. Tommy Robinson is a UK journalist and political activist known for his reporting on grooming gang scandals, radical Islam, and free speech issues in Britain. Watch the full episode here: Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 #RadicalIslam #IslamicExtremism #NationalSecurity #LaraLogan #TommyRobinson

THE QURAN COMMANDS VIOLENCE On Episode 70 of Going Rogue with Lara Logan, UK journalist and political activist Tommy Robinson sits down with Lara to discuss the ideology he believes drives extremist groups like ISIS and Boko Haram. Robinson points to statements made by terrorist organizations themselves, including ISIS and Boko Haram, who have publicly claimed religious justification for kidnappings, slavery, and attacks against civilians. He argues that many Western leaders and institutions avoid confronting the ideological motivations cited by these groups, which he believes prevents an honest conversation about the roots of radicalization. The discussion also explores how extremists interpret religious texts, the concept of abrogation in Islamic scholarship, and why Robinson says understanding these ideological frameworks is critical to confronting global jihadist movements. Tommy Robinson is a UK journalist and political activist known for his reporting on grooming gang scandals, radical Islam, and free speech issues in Britain. Watch the full episode here: Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 #RadicalIslam #IslamicExtremism #NationalSecurity #LaraLogan #TommyRobinson

Lara Logan

28,498 次观看 • 5 个月前

Jake Shields Bows to the Sword of Sharia MMA Islamic fighter Belal Muhammad openly boasts about Muslims killing those who dare insult Muhammad, while Jew-hater Jake Shields sits there nodding obediently as if murder for "blasphemy" is a perfectly acceptable price under his new masters. This is the chilling reality I have been warning the West about for years: Muslims have put the free world on notice—if you insult Muhammad, Islam, and the Quran or fail to bow to Sharia, they will kill you. This isn’t confined to distant Islamic lands—it’s happening right here, in our streets and cities. From the slaughter of Charlie Hebdo journalists in Paris, to Samuel Paty beheaded in France, to Theo van Gogh shot and stabbed in the Netherlands. Across the West, critics of Islam live like prisoners in their own countries, huddled in safe houses with round-the-clock security to protect them from religious Muslims, many of them migrants that their own governments imported. Look no further than Geert Wilders in the Netherlands, Rasmus Paludan in Denmark, or Nupur Sharma in India. Do you think Dhimmi Jake Shields realizes what his new Islamic overlords demand? Those who insult Muhammad or Allah are to be executed—so are those who "blaspheme" by desecrating the Quran. These aren’t isolated incidents. This tradition began with Muhammad himself, recorded explicitly in the Hadith and supported in the Quran. Muhammad led by example: his critics were slaughtered, dissenters silenced by the sword. Shields' submissive acceptance is only the beginning. Under Sharia, he and everyone else will face Islam’s three choices: convert, pay the jizya (a tax for non-Muslims), or die. Look at his docile nodding. Do you see it? He’s already accepted his status—inferior, fearful, obedient. But the question remains: will the rest of the West submit as willingly as Jake Shields, or will we fight to preserve freedom, truth, and civilization before it’s too late?

Jake Shields Bows to the Sword of Sharia MMA Islamic fighter Belal Muhammad openly boasts about Muslims killing those who dare insult Muhammad, while Jew-hater Jake Shields sits there nodding obediently as if murder for "blasphemy" is a perfectly acceptable price under his new masters. This is the chilling reality I have been warning the West about for years: Muslims have put the free world on notice—if you insult Muhammad, Islam, and the Quran or fail to bow to Sharia, they will kill you. This isn’t confined to distant Islamic lands—it’s happening right here, in our streets and cities. From the slaughter of Charlie Hebdo journalists in Paris, to Samuel Paty beheaded in France, to Theo van Gogh shot and stabbed in the Netherlands. Across the West, critics of Islam live like prisoners in their own countries, huddled in safe houses with round-the-clock security to protect them from religious Muslims, many of them migrants that their own governments imported. Look no further than Geert Wilders in the Netherlands, Rasmus Paludan in Denmark, or Nupur Sharma in India. Do you think Dhimmi Jake Shields realizes what his new Islamic overlords demand? Those who insult Muhammad or Allah are to be executed—so are those who "blaspheme" by desecrating the Quran. These aren’t isolated incidents. This tradition began with Muhammad himself, recorded explicitly in the Hadith and supported in the Quran. Muhammad led by example: his critics were slaughtered, dissenters silenced by the sword. Shields' submissive acceptance is only the beginning. Under Sharia, he and everyone else will face Islam’s three choices: convert, pay the jizya (a tax for non-Muslims), or die. Look at his docile nodding. Do you see it? He’s already accepted his status—inferior, fearful, obedient. But the question remains: will the rest of the West submit as willingly as Jake Shields, or will we fight to preserve freedom, truth, and civilization before it’s too late?

Amy Mek

45,985 次观看 • 1 年前

Burning the Quran: Why It’s More Than Just Protest—It’s a Stand for Freedom Thousands of people across Europe and beyond are burning Qurans in solidarity with Salwan Momika. But to many outsiders, these mass burnings may seem like nothing more than provocation—an attempt to insult Muslims or stir controversy. That could not be further from the truth. Burning the Quran is not just about offending Islam. It is about reclaiming our fundamental rights—the right to free speech, the right to criticize an ideology, and the right to push back against those who demand submission. The Quran is Not Just a Religious Book—It’s a Political Manifesto Unlike the Bible or the Torah, the Quran is not merely a spiritual text—it is an instruction manual for an authoritarian system that dictates every aspect of life and demands political supremacy. It lays out clear commands to subjugate, terrorize, and dominate non-Muslims. Burning the Quran is not an attack on religious belief—it is a rejection of Islamic supremacy and its demand for special treatment. It is a response to the reality that Islam does not integrate—it seeks to rule. A Direct Response to Violence and Censorship Every time someone burns or otherwise desecrates a Quran, they risk death, imprisonment, or government persecution. In the West, burning a Bible or desecrating Christian symbols will get you applause from the so-called “defenders of free speech.” Burning a Quran, however, gets you death threats, prison sentences, and global diplomatic outrage. This new standard reveals the truth: Islam is not a religion that coexists—it is an ideology that demands submission through fear. The West has spent decades surrendering to those threats, criminalizing speech that offends Islam, and silencing those who resist. Salwan Momika understood this. He didn’t burn Qurans to provoke—he burned them to expose the lies. He burned them to show that our so-called free societies are ruled by fear, not law. Defiance Against Government Betrayal The same Western governments that claim to uphold “freedom” are the very ones condemning, silencing, and punishing those who criticize Islam. Sweden, Denmark, and other European countries have turned their backs on their own citizens—labeling them “extremists” while allowing the Islamic migrants they import to spread their supremacist ideology unchecked. The same government that refused to protect Salwan Momika was more than happy to prosecute him for “hate speech” while ignoring the death threats against him and leaving him unprotected. Why Mass Quran Burnings Matter Thousands are now burning Qurans not out of hatred but out of solidarity. They are sending a message to their governments and to Islamic supremacists everywhere: We will not be silenced. We will not live in fear. We will not submit. Every Quran burned is a symbol of resistance, a rejection of Islam’s demand for dominance over Western civilization. Will You Stand or Submit? Burning the Quran makes people uncomfortable. Good. It should. It forces the world to confront a reality they would rather ignore: Islam is not a peaceful ideology—it is a totalitarian force that punishes those who speak against it. We can either submit to Islamic intimidation—or we can fight back. The choice is clear.

Burning the Quran: Why It’s More Than Just Protest—It’s a Stand for Freedom Thousands of people across Europe and beyond are burning Qurans in solidarity with Salwan Momika. But to many outsiders, these mass burnings may seem like nothing more than provocation—an attempt to insult Muslims or stir controversy. That could not be further from the truth. Burning the Quran is not just about offending Islam. It is about reclaiming our fundamental rights—the right to free speech, the right to criticize an ideology, and the right to push back against those who demand submission. The Quran is Not Just a Religious Book—It’s a Political Manifesto Unlike the Bible or the Torah, the Quran is not merely a spiritual text—it is an instruction manual for an authoritarian system that dictates every aspect of life and demands political supremacy. It lays out clear commands to subjugate, terrorize, and dominate non-Muslims. Burning the Quran is not an attack on religious belief—it is a rejection of Islamic supremacy and its demand for special treatment. It is a response to the reality that Islam does not integrate—it seeks to rule. A Direct Response to Violence and Censorship Every time someone burns or otherwise desecrates a Quran, they risk death, imprisonment, or government persecution. In the West, burning a Bible or desecrating Christian symbols will get you applause from the so-called “defenders of free speech.” Burning a Quran, however, gets you death threats, prison sentences, and global diplomatic outrage. This new standard reveals the truth: Islam is not a religion that coexists—it is an ideology that demands submission through fear. The West has spent decades surrendering to those threats, criminalizing speech that offends Islam, and silencing those who resist. Salwan Momika understood this. He didn’t burn Qurans to provoke—he burned them to expose the lies. He burned them to show that our so-called free societies are ruled by fear, not law. Defiance Against Government Betrayal The same Western governments that claim to uphold “freedom” are the very ones condemning, silencing, and punishing those who criticize Islam. Sweden, Denmark, and other European countries have turned their backs on their own citizens—labeling them “extremists” while allowing the Islamic migrants they import to spread their supremacist ideology unchecked. The same government that refused to protect Salwan Momika was more than happy to prosecute him for “hate speech” while ignoring the death threats against him and leaving him unprotected. Why Mass Quran Burnings Matter Thousands are now burning Qurans not out of hatred but out of solidarity. They are sending a message to their governments and to Islamic supremacists everywhere: We will not be silenced. We will not live in fear. We will not submit. Every Quran burned is a symbol of resistance, a rejection of Islam’s demand for dominance over Western civilization. Will You Stand or Submit? Burning the Quran makes people uncomfortable. Good. It should. It forces the world to confront a reality they would rather ignore: Islam is not a peaceful ideology—it is a totalitarian force that punishes those who speak against it. We can either submit to Islamic intimidation—or we can fight back. The choice is clear.

Amy Mek

323,761 次观看 • 1 年前

Loyalty and Disavowal: The Principle of Al-Wala' Wal-Bara' The smile is just a mask, hatred is a duty: Why they are forbidden to love us, even if we are their family. By: Ofer Binshtok 1. The Islamic principle of Al-Wala' Wal-Bara' (Loyalty and Disavowal) forms a cornerstone of the declaration of faith (Shahada), fundamentally shaping a Muslim’s relationships and actions. - Wala' (Loyalty): Arises from love for Allah. It drives believers to cultivate closeness, offer support, and provide protection to those who follow His path. This manifests in tangible acts such as defending the faith, aiding fellow Muslims, and honoring their shared commitment. - Bara' (Disavowal): Stems from the rejection of disbelief. It leads to active opposition, distance, and enmity toward those who oppose Allah or His message. This principle allows no gray area: anyone who is not a Muslim hates Allah and His Prophet and must therefore be the absolute enemy of every Muslim. These principles are not mere sentiments but demand practical commitment in both speech and deeds. 2. Quranic Evidence: Alliances and Relationships The Quran provides explicit guidance on maintaining loyalty to believers while dissociating from disbelievers. It warns against prioritizing alliances with non-Muslims: - Prohibition of Alliances: The Quran warns against prioritizing alliances with disbelievers over fellow believers, stating that such actions sever one’s connection with Allah, unless done cautiously for self-preservation (Taqiyya; Quran 3:28). - Jews and Christians: The Quran leaves no loophole: true friendship or alliance with a Jew or Christian equals outright kufr that takes one out of Islam (Quran 5:51). Full stop. - Defining True Love: True love for Allah is demonstrated by following Muhammad. Turning away aligns one with those Allah disapproves of (Quran 3:31-32). - Condition for Contact: Believers are urged to avoid ties with those who desire Muslims to abandon their faith, unless the disbelievers embrace Allah’s path (Quran 4:89). 3. Faith Over Family The doctrine places religious loyalty above biological kinship: - Betrayal of Faith: Believers are instructed not to take disbelievers as allies, even if they are close relatives, if they oppose Allah and Muhammad (Quran 60:1). - Parental Ties: Muslims are commanded not to prioritize familial ties with disbelieving parents or siblings over their faith (Quran 9:23). - The Reward: True believers do not harbor affection for those who oppose Allah, even if they are kin. In return, Allah strengthens their hearts with faith (Quran 58:22). - The Obligation of Hatred: If your father or brother is a non-Muslim, you are obliged to hate him and sever all emotional ties with him as long as he persists in his disbelief. Any love toward him is a sin that nullifies faith. 4. The Example of Ibrahim (Abraham) The ultimate model for Bara' (Disavowal) is found in Prophet Ibrahim’s declaration to his people: “We disassociate ourselves from you and what you worship besides Allah. Enmity and hatred have arisen between us until you believe in Allah alone.” (Quran 60:4) 5. Clarifications from the Sunnah The traditions of Prophet Muhammad reinforce these teachings with explicit instructions: - The Strongest Bond: The Prophet explicitly defined the core of faith, stating: "The strongest bond to faith is to take the believers (Muslims) as allies and friends for the sake of Allah, to treat unbelievers as enemies for the sake of Allah, to love for the sake of Allah and hate for the sake of Allah." (Jalal al-Din al-Suyuti, Sahih Al-Jami as-Saghir 2539). - The Oath: Muhammad instructed a companion to swear an oath to offer sincere guidance to Muslims while refraining from forming close bonds with disbelievers. - Active Solidarity: Scholars explain that Wala' entails defending Muslims and upholding their honor, while Bara' requires concrete opposition, rejecting false ideologies and avoiding cooperation with Islam's opponents. 6. The Two Parties: Allah vs. Satan The doctrine creates a binary worldview: - The Party of Allah: Those guided from darkness to light (Quran 2:257). They strive for Allah’s cause and are promised victory in both intellectual debates and physical struggles (Quran 6:112, 37:173). - The Party of Satan: Those who lead others into darkness. The Quran urges Muslims to confront the allies of Satan, describing their strategies as ultimately weak (Quran 4:76). 7. Modern Application and Threats Enemies of Islam, whether atheists, secularists, proponents of contradictory ideologies, or simply non-Muslims, are viewed as seeking to erode Muslim identity. - Deceptive Concepts: Ideas such as "universal brotherhood" or the separation of religion from state are seen as tools to weaken the Muslim community. - Equality vs. Hierarchy: Calls for equality that ignore religious differences are considered a direct challenge to Al-Wala' Wal-Bara'. 8. Conclusion Muslims are commanded to arm themselves with conviction to counter these threats. Adhering strictly to the explicit commands of the Quran and the Sunnah of Muhammad, this doctrine dictates absolute allegiance solely to fellow believers and active, unyielding enmity toward non-Muslims. This is not an interpretation by later scholars, but a fundamental divine obligation to reject any spiritual alignment with those outside the faith. Any Muslim who violates this principle, who shows mercy, sympathy, or cooperation with disbelievers, is himself a disbeliever, and according to classical Sharia his blood becomes permissible. This is not “extremism”; this is pure faith exactly as Allah and His Prophet commanded. By enforcing this clear separation, Muslims fulfill their complete submission to Allah, ensuring their identity remains distinct and uncontaminated by the influence of non-Muslims.

Loyalty and Disavowal: The Principle of Al-Wala' Wal-Bara' The smile is just a mask, hatred is a duty: Why they are forbidden to love us, even if we are their family. By: Ofer Binshtok 1. The Islamic principle of Al-Wala' Wal-Bara' (Loyalty and Disavowal) forms a cornerstone of the declaration of faith (Shahada), fundamentally shaping a Muslim’s relationships and actions. - Wala' (Loyalty): Arises from love for Allah. It drives believers to cultivate closeness, offer support, and provide protection to those who follow His path. This manifests in tangible acts such as defending the faith, aiding fellow Muslims, and honoring their shared commitment. - Bara' (Disavowal): Stems from the rejection of disbelief. It leads to active opposition, distance, and enmity toward those who oppose Allah or His message. This principle allows no gray area: anyone who is not a Muslim hates Allah and His Prophet and must therefore be the absolute enemy of every Muslim. These principles are not mere sentiments but demand practical commitment in both speech and deeds. 2. Quranic Evidence: Alliances and Relationships The Quran provides explicit guidance on maintaining loyalty to believers while dissociating from disbelievers. It warns against prioritizing alliances with non-Muslims: - Prohibition of Alliances: The Quran warns against prioritizing alliances with disbelievers over fellow believers, stating that such actions sever one’s connection with Allah, unless done cautiously for self-preservation (Taqiyya; Quran 3:28). - Jews and Christians: The Quran leaves no loophole: true friendship or alliance with a Jew or Christian equals outright kufr that takes one out of Islam (Quran 5:51). Full stop. - Defining True Love: True love for Allah is demonstrated by following Muhammad. Turning away aligns one with those Allah disapproves of (Quran 3:31-32). - Condition for Contact: Believers are urged to avoid ties with those who desire Muslims to abandon their faith, unless the disbelievers embrace Allah’s path (Quran 4:89). 3. Faith Over Family The doctrine places religious loyalty above biological kinship: - Betrayal of Faith: Believers are instructed not to take disbelievers as allies, even if they are close relatives, if they oppose Allah and Muhammad (Quran 60:1). - Parental Ties: Muslims are commanded not to prioritize familial ties with disbelieving parents or siblings over their faith (Quran 9:23). - The Reward: True believers do not harbor affection for those who oppose Allah, even if they are kin. In return, Allah strengthens their hearts with faith (Quran 58:22). - The Obligation of Hatred: If your father or brother is a non-Muslim, you are obliged to hate him and sever all emotional ties with him as long as he persists in his disbelief. Any love toward him is a sin that nullifies faith. 4. The Example of Ibrahim (Abraham) The ultimate model for Bara' (Disavowal) is found in Prophet Ibrahim’s declaration to his people: “We disassociate ourselves from you and what you worship besides Allah. Enmity and hatred have arisen between us until you believe in Allah alone.” (Quran 60:4) 5. Clarifications from the Sunnah The traditions of Prophet Muhammad reinforce these teachings with explicit instructions: - The Strongest Bond: The Prophet explicitly defined the core of faith, stating: "The strongest bond to faith is to take the believers (Muslims) as allies and friends for the sake of Allah, to treat unbelievers as enemies for the sake of Allah, to love for the sake of Allah and hate for the sake of Allah." (Jalal al-Din al-Suyuti, Sahih Al-Jami as-Saghir 2539). - The Oath: Muhammad instructed a companion to swear an oath to offer sincere guidance to Muslims while refraining from forming close bonds with disbelievers. - Active Solidarity: Scholars explain that Wala' entails defending Muslims and upholding their honor, while Bara' requires concrete opposition, rejecting false ideologies and avoiding cooperation with Islam's opponents. 6. The Two Parties: Allah vs. Satan The doctrine creates a binary worldview: - The Party of Allah: Those guided from darkness to light (Quran 2:257). They strive for Allah’s cause and are promised victory in both intellectual debates and physical struggles (Quran 6:112, 37:173). - The Party of Satan: Those who lead others into darkness. The Quran urges Muslims to confront the allies of Satan, describing their strategies as ultimately weak (Quran 4:76). 7. Modern Application and Threats Enemies of Islam, whether atheists, secularists, proponents of contradictory ideologies, or simply non-Muslims, are viewed as seeking to erode Muslim identity. - Deceptive Concepts: Ideas such as "universal brotherhood" or the separation of religion from state are seen as tools to weaken the Muslim community. - Equality vs. Hierarchy: Calls for equality that ignore religious differences are considered a direct challenge to Al-Wala' Wal-Bara'. 8. Conclusion Muslims are commanded to arm themselves with conviction to counter these threats. Adhering strictly to the explicit commands of the Quran and the Sunnah of Muhammad, this doctrine dictates absolute allegiance solely to fellow believers and active, unyielding enmity toward non-Muslims. This is not an interpretation by later scholars, but a fundamental divine obligation to reject any spiritual alignment with those outside the faith. Any Muslim who violates this principle, who shows mercy, sympathy, or cooperation with disbelievers, is himself a disbeliever, and according to classical Sharia his blood becomes permissible. This is not “extremism”; this is pure faith exactly as Allah and His Prophet commanded. By enforcing this clear separation, Muslims fulfill their complete submission to Allah, ensuring their identity remains distinct and uncontaminated by the influence of non-Muslims.

Ofer Binshtok - Kafir - עופר בינשטוק

65,260 次观看 • 9 个月前