正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Mujica: In the same way that here in Florida we prepare for hurricanes—deploying resources, retrofitting buildings, and readying for the storm—I would argue that we have to treat AI in a very similar way when it comes to jobs. We need a FEMA-style economic resilience mechanism for job disruption.... show more

Acyn

730,959 subscribers

27,326 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Captain Mark Kelly on jobs and AI, to CBS News’s Robert Costa: “Our job here in government – and I look at it as my job – how do we guide this, put the guardrails in place to get to the right outcome?” “And what that outcome is – is that millions of people do not lose their jobs, and if they do, we provide resources so they can be retrained for existing jobs or jobs of the future.”

Captain Mark Kelly on jobs and AI, to CBS News’s Robert Costa: “Our job here in government – and I look at it as my job – how do we guide this, put the guardrails in place to get to the right outcome?” “And what that outcome is – is that millions of people do not lose their jobs, and if they do, we provide resources so they can be retrained for existing jobs or jobs of the future.”

Semafor

24,100 次观看 • 3 个月前

Shuler: If you think about every industrial revolution we’ve been through, working people have helped us make that transition. It’s really because we’ve helped tame the technology and figured out how to use it in the most effective way. So I think your question about augmentation versus replacement is the big question we have. If we can all agree that this is about making our jobs better, safer, easier, and more productive, then we’re all in. But if you’re looking to de-skill, dehumanize, and replace workers, to put people out on the street with no path forward, then absolutely you’re going to have a revolution. So I think that’s something we all need to be very real about and think seriously about. If we’re going to have productivity gains, working people—the ones who make these industries happen—need to share in that. There hasn’t been a lot of discussion about that here. Of course, in terms of how we create policies, how we create tax infrastructure, whether or not we are redistributing—yes, that word is a dirty word around here—we need to talk about it and confront how we’re going to make sure working people share in the gains of these technologies. And if you look at the numbers of jobs, let’s talk about job quality. Yes, maybe there are a lot of jobs created, but what kind of jobs are we talking about? Are they jobs that can sustain a family? Is it a job where people can actually work one job? One job should be enough.

Shuler: If you think about every industrial revolution we’ve been through, working people have helped us make that transition. It’s really because we’ve helped tame the technology and figured out how to use it in the most effective way. So I think your question about augmentation versus replacement is the big question we have. If we can all agree that this is about making our jobs better, safer, easier, and more productive, then we’re all in. But if you’re looking to de-skill, dehumanize, and replace workers, to put people out on the street with no path forward, then absolutely you’re going to have a revolution. So I think that’s something we all need to be very real about and think seriously about. If we’re going to have productivity gains, working people—the ones who make these industries happen—need to share in that. There hasn’t been a lot of discussion about that here. Of course, in terms of how we create policies, how we create tax infrastructure, whether or not we are redistributing—yes, that word is a dirty word around here—we need to talk about it and confront how we’re going to make sure working people share in the gains of these technologies. And if you look at the numbers of jobs, let’s talk about job quality. Yes, maybe there are a lot of jobs created, but what kind of jobs are we talking about? Are they jobs that can sustain a family? Is it a job where people can actually work one job? One job should be enough.

Acyn

41,942 次观看 • 6 个月前

Her take is SPOT ON!! "Illegal immigrant makes excuses as to why he should stay in America saying he is taking jobs that Americans don't want." "These are jobs that American kids want, teenagers! First job? They would be happy to have them jobs." "Illegals going and getting them then the employers don't have to pay taxes on them." "Then you have the ones in Dearborn Michigan. Those are the ones we REALLY need to get rid of." "If you didn't come here the right way, you need to pack your bags and go back where you came from." BASED!!

Her take is SPOT ON!! "Illegal immigrant makes excuses as to why he should stay in America saying he is taking jobs that Americans don't want." "These are jobs that American kids want, teenagers! First job? They would be happy to have them jobs." "Illegals going and getting them then the employers don't have to pay taxes on them." "Then you have the ones in Dearborn Michigan. Those are the ones we REALLY need to get rid of." "If you didn't come here the right way, you need to pack your bags and go back where you came from." BASED!!

AmericanPapaBear™

76,415 次观看 • 7 个月前

Reporter: If you were able to sign the executive order paying TSA agents, why wouldn't you do it for FEMA? Trump: FEMA is a very expensive way of trying to put out a problem. What I would rather do is let the states do it… In North Carolina, they did a terrible job until I became elected. We are going to do things right, and if we don't do them right, we should not do them at all

Reporter: If you were able to sign the executive order paying TSA agents, why wouldn't you do it for FEMA? Trump: FEMA is a very expensive way of trying to put out a problem. What I would rather do is let the states do it… In North Carolina, they did a terrible job until I became elected. We are going to do things right, and if we don't do them right, we should not do them at all

Acyn

79,154 次观看 • 4 个月前

Chamath on Whether AI Should Be Throttled to Protect Driving & Warehouse Jobs “The question that I would have is do the people that do these jobs, want these jobs? … Amazon has 35-40% churn inside of their warehouses … Why is that? If it was such a great job, I suspect the churn would be 3-4%. So what exactly is it that we want to protect?”

Chamath on Whether AI Should Be Throttled to Protect Driving & Warehouse Jobs “The question that I would have is do the people that do these jobs, want these jobs? … Amazon has 35-40% churn inside of their warehouses … Why is that? If it was such a great job, I suspect the churn would be 3-4%. So what exactly is it that we want to protect?”

Chief Nerd

21,917 次观看 • 2 个月前

Trump: The FEMA thing has not been a very successful experiment. Very very expensive and it doesn’t get the job done. You saw that in North Carolina. We did a great job for North Carolina.

Trump: The FEMA thing has not been a very successful experiment. Very very expensive and it doesn’t get the job done. You saw that in North Carolina. We did a great job for North Carolina.

Acyn

300,779 次观看 • 1 年前

DAVID SACKS ON THE AI RACE: "The US is currently in an AI race, and our chief global competition is China, obviously. They're the only other country that has the talent, the resources, and the technology expertise to basically beat us in AI. And I think whoever wins this AI race, that's going to have tremendous ramifications for both our economy and our national security. Clearly, we want the US to be the winner, just like we were with the internet, and every other technology revolution before that […] We know that to win this AI race, we have to be the most innovative. You can't regulate your way just to beating your competitor. You have to out-innovate them. And we know that in the United States, the innovation comes from the private sector, not the government. So we have to do everything we can to help our companies win, to help them be innovative, and that means getting a lot of red tape out of the way… We have to have the most AI infrastructure in the US. It has to be the easiest place to build it. All of the new data centers that are going in, they require tremendous power, so getting ahead of the curve on energy, making sure we stand up all of this new infrastructure we're going to need to basically produce these AI factories… We want the US technology stack to dominate globally. We want to be the partner of choice for the whole world… I think everyone in Silicon Valley understands that the way that you win a technology race is to have the biggest ecosystem […] You just want everybody to be building on top of your technology stack, and that's what we want for the United States." David Sacks w/Marc Benioff Dreamforce

DAVID SACKS ON THE AI RACE: "The US is currently in an AI race, and our chief global competition is China, obviously. They're the only other country that has the talent, the resources, and the technology expertise to basically beat us in AI. And I think whoever wins this AI race, that's going to have tremendous ramifications for both our economy and our national security. Clearly, we want the US to be the winner, just like we were with the internet, and every other technology revolution before that […] We know that to win this AI race, we have to be the most innovative. You can't regulate your way just to beating your competitor. You have to out-innovate them. And we know that in the United States, the innovation comes from the private sector, not the government. So we have to do everything we can to help our companies win, to help them be innovative, and that means getting a lot of red tape out of the way… We have to have the most AI infrastructure in the US. It has to be the easiest place to build it. All of the new data centers that are going in, they require tremendous power, so getting ahead of the curve on energy, making sure we stand up all of this new infrastructure we're going to need to basically produce these AI factories… We want the US technology stack to dominate globally. We want to be the partner of choice for the whole world… I think everyone in Silicon Valley understands that the way that you win a technology race is to have the biggest ecosystem […] You just want everybody to be building on top of your technology stack, and that's what we want for the United States." David Sacks w/Marc Benioff Dreamforce

Ron Pragides 

231,781 次观看 • 9 个月前

Sanders: The report pointed out that AI and robotics will have a huge impact in eliminating millions and millions of jobs. The CEO of Anthropic warned that AI could lead to the loss of half of all entry-level white-collar jobs. The people who know the most about this are already telling us that we’re going to see the displacement of tens of millions of jobs in the coming decades. Are we prepared to deal with that? The wealthiest people on earth are pouring hundreds of billions of dollars into research and development for AI and robotics. You tell me why they’re doing that. You think they’re doing that because they’re thinking, “Oh man, this is going to improve life for working people, for low-income people”?

Sanders: The report pointed out that AI and robotics will have a huge impact in eliminating millions and millions of jobs. The CEO of Anthropic warned that AI could lead to the loss of half of all entry-level white-collar jobs. The people who know the most about this are already telling us that we’re going to see the displacement of tens of millions of jobs in the coming decades. Are we prepared to deal with that? The wealthiest people on earth are pouring hundreds of billions of dollars into research and development for AI and robotics. You tell me why they’re doing that. You think they’re doing that because they’re thinking, “Oh man, this is going to improve life for working people, for low-income people”?

Acyn

120,714 次观看 • 8 个月前

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang tells Joe Rogan that President Trump’s “drill, baby, drill” energy policy literally saved the AI industry. And countless jobs for Americans. HUANG: “If United States doesn’t grow, we will have no prosperity. We can’t invest in anything domestically or otherwise. We can’t fix any of our problems.” “If we don’t have energy growth, we can’t have industrial growth. If we don’t have industrial growth, we can have job growth. It’s as simple as that.” “And the fact that he came into office and the first thing that he said was ‘drill, baby, drill’, his point is we need energy growth.” “Without energy growth, we can have no industrial growth.” “And that was…it saved the AI industry.” “I got to tell you flat out, if not for his pro-growth energy policy, we would not be able to build factories for AI, we would not be able to build chip factories, we surely wouldn’t be able to build supercomputer factories.” “None of that stuff would be possible and without all of that, construction jobs will be challenged, electrician jobs, all of these jobs that are now flourishing would be challenged.” “And so I think he’s got it right. We need energy growth. We want to re-industrialize the United States.”

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang tells Joe Rogan that President Trump’s “drill, baby, drill” energy policy literally saved the AI industry. And countless jobs for Americans. HUANG: “If United States doesn’t grow, we will have no prosperity. We can’t invest in anything domestically or otherwise. We can’t fix any of our problems.” “If we don’t have energy growth, we can’t have industrial growth. If we don’t have industrial growth, we can have job growth. It’s as simple as that.” “And the fact that he came into office and the first thing that he said was ‘drill, baby, drill’, his point is we need energy growth.” “Without energy growth, we can have no industrial growth.” “And that was…it saved the AI industry.” “I got to tell you flat out, if not for his pro-growth energy policy, we would not be able to build factories for AI, we would not be able to build chip factories, we surely wouldn’t be able to build supercomputer factories.” “None of that stuff would be possible and without all of that, construction jobs will be challenged, electrician jobs, all of these jobs that are now flourishing would be challenged.” “And so I think he’s got it right. We need energy growth. We want to re-industrialize the United States.”

Overton

21,073 次观看 • 8 个月前

Microsoft's Chief of AI just announced that AI will replace almost all white-collar jobs within 18 months. Big Tech used our data to train their AI. Now that same AI is coming for our jobs. And we get nothing in return? If AI replaces us…we should own it. That’s why we built Action Model Not another chatbot. A community-owned AI model that acts. An AI trained by the people. Owned by the people. No billionaires controlling it. No extracting value from users. No “you are the product” model. Over 150,000+ people are already earning ownership in the AI future with Action Model. You should be too.

Microsoft's Chief of AI just announced that AI will replace almost all white-collar jobs within 18 months. Big Tech used our data to train their AI. Now that same AI is coming for our jobs. And we get nothing in return? If AI replaces us…we should own it. That’s why we built Action Model Not another chatbot. A community-owned AI model that acts. An AI trained by the people. Owned by the people. No billionaires controlling it. No extracting value from users. No “you are the product” model. Over 150,000+ people are already earning ownership in the AI future with Action Model. You should be too.

Georgia | Action Model

13,198 次观看 • 5 个月前

The man who built Nvidia from a Denny's booth into the world's first $5 trillion company just told us exactly why AI will never take our jobs. "AI has no possibility of doing all of what we do. However, depending on the jobs that we do, sometimes it could do 20% of our jobs, a thousand times better." "For some people, it might be able to do 50% of their job, a thousand times better." "Every one of us should apply AI to automate, to become an assistant, to help us with that either 20%, 40% or 50%." "People ask me, Jensen, is AI going to take your job? And I tell them absolutely not. The person who uses AI to automate that 20% or 50% is going to take your job." PS. If you found value in this post make sure to like and repost this tweet + follow Uncover AI to stay updated with the latest AI news. See you in the next one:

The man who built Nvidia from a Denny's booth into the world's first $5 trillion company just told us exactly why AI will never take our jobs. "AI has no possibility of doing all of what we do. However, depending on the jobs that we do, sometimes it could do 20% of our jobs, a thousand times better." "For some people, it might be able to do 50% of their job, a thousand times better." "Every one of us should apply AI to automate, to become an assistant, to help us with that either 20%, 40% or 50%." "People ask me, Jensen, is AI going to take your job? And I tell them absolutely not. The person who uses AI to automate that 20% or 50% is going to take your job." PS. If you found value in this post make sure to like and repost this tweet + follow Uncover AI to stay updated with the latest AI news. See you in the next one:

Uncover AI

16,813 次观看 • 2 个月前

Shuler: As a backdrop, the economy isn’t working for working people right now. We have inequality at its highest levels. People are working harder and harder for less. They’re working two and three jobs just to keep up. In the U.S., 40 percent of workers do not have $400 for an emergency. Now put AI on top of that—the insecurity that we are all experiencing, the fact that people are waking up and some new technology is landing in their jobs without training and without having a say. Of course they’re going to be anxious and feel insecure about what the future holds. And so I really think we need to stop and ask, “Who are we doing this for? What are the results we want? And how do we get there?” We get there by including workers in the process. They shouldn’t have to be at the end of the cycle. They should actually be upstream.

Shuler: As a backdrop, the economy isn’t working for working people right now. We have inequality at its highest levels. People are working harder and harder for less. They’re working two and three jobs just to keep up. In the U.S., 40 percent of workers do not have $400 for an emergency. Now put AI on top of that—the insecurity that we are all experiencing, the fact that people are waking up and some new technology is landing in their jobs without training and without having a say. Of course they’re going to be anxious and feel insecure about what the future holds. And so I really think we need to stop and ask, “Who are we doing this for? What are the results we want? And how do we get there?” We get there by including workers in the process. They shouldn’t have to be at the end of the cycle. They should actually be upstream.

Acyn

41,208 次观看 • 6 个月前

JD Vance’s February speech here in Paris on AI was delusional. He parroted AI industry talking points, in particular that advanced AI will not kill jobs. It will. AI comes with huge upside, but if we have no plan to manage the job loss, we could face societal collapse.

JD Vance’s February speech here in Paris on AI was delusional. He parroted AI industry talking points, in particular that advanced AI will not kill jobs. It will. AI comes with huge upside, but if we have no plan to manage the job loss, we could face societal collapse.

Chris Murphy 🟧

38,236 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨NEW: David Sacks, Chamath, and Naval make the case for AI optimism and say that AI will *create* more jobs than it displaces SACKS: "We don't know that jobs are actually going to be lost. You're making a huge assumption thats buying into doomerism. Have any jobs been lost by AI? We've had AI for two years and so far it's just been a better search engine and it's helped kids cheat on their essays." NAVAL: "Technology does destroy jobs but it replaces them with opportunities that are better. AI is a productivity tool, it allows the worker to become more valuable. We will see job creation by AI that will be *faster* than job destruction. New opportunities will be created." SACKS: "Whenever you have a new technology you get productivity gains, you get some job change, and there is some job loss. The third category will follow the historical trend which is the first two categories are always bigger and you end up with more net productivity and wealth creation." David Sacks Chamath Palihapitiya Naval The All-In Podcast

🚨NEW: David Sacks, Chamath, and Naval make the case for AI optimism and say that AI will create more jobs than it displaces SACKS: "We don't know that jobs are actually going to be lost. You're making a huge assumption thats buying into doomerism. Have any jobs been lost by AI? We've had AI for two years and so far it's just been a better search engine and it's helped kids cheat on their essays." NAVAL: "Technology does destroy jobs but it replaces them with opportunities that are better. AI is a productivity tool, it allows the worker to become more valuable. We will see job creation by AI that will be faster than job destruction. New opportunities will be created." SACKS: "Whenever you have a new technology you get productivity gains, you get some job change, and there is some job loss. The third category will follow the historical trend which is the first two categories are always bigger and you end up with more net productivity and wealth creation." David Sacks Chamath Palihapitiya Naval The All-In Podcast

Autism Capital 🧩

316,935 次观看 • 1 年前

Vance: I understand why people are worried that, you know, if you have a robot doing that job, does it take away from a blue-collar worker who could do that job? The evidence I see is that if we really lean in to robotics and technology, it’s is going to raise everybody's wages and make everybody better off. If you go back to when the automated teller machine was invented, everybody said it would destroy the jobs of all the bank tellers. What actually happened is that today you have more people working in bank telling then you did 50 years ago. I don't think we will ever eliminate the construction industry in this country just because you have robots. What you will have his a lot of construction workers who are using those robots, directing those robots

Vance: I understand why people are worried that, you know, if you have a robot doing that job, does it take away from a blue-collar worker who could do that job? The evidence I see is that if we really lean in to robotics and technology, it’s is going to raise everybody's wages and make everybody better off. If you go back to when the automated teller machine was invented, everybody said it would destroy the jobs of all the bank tellers. What actually happened is that today you have more people working in bank telling then you did 50 years ago. I don't think we will ever eliminate the construction industry in this country just because you have robots. What you will have his a lot of construction workers who are using those robots, directing those robots

Acyn

156,104 次观看 • 8 个月前

Last night I sat through three hours of Labour and Lib Dem MPs advocating for migrants. That is not their job. Their job is to do what’s best for the British people. Being allowed to settle in this country is a privilege and we should treat it that way.

Last night I sat through three hours of Labour and Lib Dem MPs advocating for migrants. That is not their job. Their job is to do what’s best for the British people. Being allowed to settle in this country is a privilege and we should treat it that way.

Katie Lam

442,894 次观看 • 11 个月前

CNN’s Jake Tapper: “Are you thinking of maybe running [for president in 2028]?” Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis: “I'm not thinking about anything because I think we have a president now who has not even been in for a year. We've got a lot that we've got to accomplish. I'm obviously working hard to put points on the board in Florida, but look at the election results two weeks ago for Republicans, that was not good.” “You know, we've got to do a good job as Republicans. And I think that should be the number one priority. And the way you do well in the midterm elections is to produce positive results. And so I would focus on that, this jockeying and all that I don't think is productive for us, get things done for people. You know, we showed in Florida when I came in, we were a purple state. Now we’re considered a red state because we produced results and people followed.”

CNN’s Jake Tapper: “Are you thinking of maybe running [for president in 2028]?” Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis: “I'm not thinking about anything because I think we have a president now who has not even been in for a year. We've got a lot that we've got to accomplish. I'm obviously working hard to put points on the board in Florida, but look at the election results two weeks ago for Republicans, that was not good.” “You know, we've got to do a good job as Republicans. And I think that should be the number one priority. And the way you do well in the midterm elections is to produce positive results. And so I would focus on that, this jockeying and all that I don't think is productive for us, get things done for people. You know, we showed in Florida when I came in, we were a purple state. Now we’re considered a red state because we produced results and people followed.”

RedWave Press

342,169 次观看 • 8 个月前

👀 Full clip of Jensen Huang on energy policy and AI is even more direct: “The fact that Trump came into office and the first thing he said was ‘drill, baby, drill’…it saved the AI industry. I got to tell you flat out, if not for his pro-growth energy policy, we would not be able to build factories for AI, we would not be able to build chip factories. We surely wouldn’t be able to build supercomputer factories. None of that stuff would be possible. Without all of that, construction jobs would be challenged…electrician jobs would be challenged. So I think he’s got it right. We need energy growth. We want to reindustrialize the United States. We need to be back in manufacturing.“

👀 Full clip of Jensen Huang on energy policy and AI is even more direct: “The fact that Trump came into office and the first thing he said was ‘drill, baby, drill’…it saved the AI industry. I got to tell you flat out, if not for his pro-growth energy policy, we would not be able to build factories for AI, we would not be able to build chip factories. We surely wouldn’t be able to build supercomputer factories. None of that stuff would be possible. Without all of that, construction jobs would be challenged…electrician jobs would be challenged. So I think he’s got it right. We need energy growth. We want to reindustrialize the United States. We need to be back in manufacturing.“

Dan Byers

37,753 次观看 • 8 个月前

Oz: Why is the number one job in New York personal care services? Governors and other authorities look the other way on purpose, because if you can employ people in these simple jobs and pay money to have your kids carry the grocery upstairs. This is the part that will get you angry. Once these people are put on to these jobs programs, they are also eligible to be unionized, and so we have unions now get, in California and in New York, for these employees

Oz: Why is the number one job in New York personal care services? Governors and other authorities look the other way on purpose, because if you can employ people in these simple jobs and pay money to have your kids carry the grocery upstairs. This is the part that will get you angry. Once these people are put on to these jobs programs, they are also eligible to be unionized, and so we have unions now get, in California and in New York, for these employees

Acyn

20,593 次观看 • 2 个月前

FEMA Spokesperson Jaclyn Rothenberg: I want everyone listening to hear it from me: FEMA helps all people before, during, and after disasters. FEMA helps people before, during, and after disasters — it is our mission statement, and it is in every tagline. We help people regardless of background, across all of these states that need assistance. Our goal is to get assistance into the hands of people who need it most, regardless of their background, and that’s what we’ll continue to do. When I hear the misinformation about FEMA only providing assistance to certain people, that’s really hard to hear because that’s absolutely not true. We help people in every community where there’s a federally declared disaster, and it’s really unfortunate that there’s misinformation because that discourages people from applying for assistance. So I want to make sure that people apply for FEMA assistance. That’s 1-800-621-3362. If we haven’t heard from you, please call. You can also register on We want to make sure that we can help you get critical funding. We can help provide you with individual assistance to help repair your home. If you’re an entrepreneur… if your personal computer has been impacted, we can help pay for that. We can help you apply for all these different types of programs across the federal government so we can get you back on your feet.

FEMA Spokesperson Jaclyn Rothenberg: I want everyone listening to hear it from me: FEMA helps all people before, during, and after disasters. FEMA helps people before, during, and after disasters — it is our mission statement, and it is in every tagline. We help people regardless of background, across all of these states that need assistance. Our goal is to get assistance into the hands of people who need it most, regardless of their background, and that’s what we’ll continue to do. When I hear the misinformation about FEMA only providing assistance to certain people, that’s really hard to hear because that’s absolutely not true. We help people in every community where there’s a federally declared disaster, and it’s really unfortunate that there’s misinformation because that discourages people from applying for assistance. So I want to make sure that people apply for FEMA assistance. That’s 1-800-621-3362. If we haven’t heard from you, please call. You can also register on We want to make sure that we can help you get critical funding. We can help provide you with individual assistance to help repair your home. If you’re an entrepreneur… if your personal computer has been impacted, we can help pay for that. We can help you apply for all these different types of programs across the federal government so we can get you back on your feet.

Acyn

416,712 次观看 • 1 年前