Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Mulago 2, Kampala enumerators boycott census duties over unpaid training fees. #NTVNews 📹: Juma Kiirya

127,009 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Greg Abbott signed an EO labeling CAIR terrorists. CAIR already beat him in court 3x for violating the 1st Amend: - IHRA order criminalizing criticism of Israel - 2x over anti-BDS laws requiring no-boycott pledges Israel shills are celebrating but he’ll be sued for the 4th time CAIR (a muslim civil liberties org) has challenged several Texas policies under Governor Greg Abbott that they argue violate the First Amendment by suppressing criticism of Israel or Palestinian advocacy. 1. Amawi v. Pflugerville Independent School District (2019) CAIR provided legal support and filed an amicus brief in this federal lawsuit challenging a Texas law (signed by Abbott in 2017) requiring contractors, including teachers, to certify they do not boycott Israel. The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas ruled the law unconstitutional, issuing a permanent injunction blocking its enforcement in public school contracts. This was a major First Amendment victory protecting free speech rights. 2. Hassouna v. Sheppard (2022) CAIR filed this First Amendment lawsuit on behalf of Palestinian-American engineer Rasmy Hassouna, who refused to sign a state contract pledge not to boycott Israel under the same 2017 anti-BDS law. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas ruled in CAIR's favor, granting a preliminary injunction and declaring the pledge unconstitutional as compelled speech. The court later awarded attorney fees to CAIR after appeals. 3. Democratic Socialists of America-Houston et al. v. Abbott (2024) CAIR filed this lawsuit on behalf of student groups (Students for Justice in Palestine chapters and DSA-Houston) against Abbott's Executive Order GA-44, which targeted pro-Palestinian campus activism as antisemitic. In October 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas ruled the order unconstitutional, enjoining its enforcement and affirming that prohibitions on criticizing Israel violate free speech protections.

GenXGirl

23,177 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Perhaps, the reason SEN Natasha Uduaghan is faulted so much is because she exposes this guys at the Senate, way too much. Direct Empowerment Items (Distributed to ~2,000 Individuals) 1. Electric tricycles (Nigeria’s first constituency electric vehicle scheme) – over 100 units for sustainable transport. 2. Farming tools, seeds, and fertilizers (for rural farmers to boost agriculture). 3. Tailoring/sewing machines (for vocational training and entrepreneurship). 4. Hairdressing/barbing salon kits (skill acquisition tools). 5. Carpentry and woodworking tool sets. 6. Grinding machines (for food processing and small businesses). 7. Deep freezers and gas cookers (for traders and home-based enterprises). 8. Shoemaking kits (co-blast kits for artisans). 9. Fishery ponds and related equipment (for aquaculture startups). 10. Startup cash grants and direct financial transfers (to widows, youth, and small business owners). 11. Educational scholarships and school supplies (fees, books, and materials for students). Infrastructural Project Commissionings 1. New primary and secondary schools (brand-new facilities, including model schools specifically commissioned in Fulani settlements to promote inclusive education for nomadic communities). 2. Police officers' quarters (housing for Divisional Police Officers (DPOs) and other officers, enhancing security infrastructure). 3. Boreholes (for clean water access in underserved areas). 4. Streetlights and transformers (for improved electricity and safety). 5. Modern markets (two new markets with stalls allocated to female traders, supporting economic participation). 6. Health/maternity kits and upcoming maternity center (kits distributed; center set for commissioning in December 2025). 7. Launch of Kogi Central People’s Company Limited by Guarantee (a community-owned entity to manage assets like markets and vehicles, with profits funding scholarships, erosion control, and welfare for widows/orphans).

Ozor Ndi Ozor

111,722 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

The NZ$2B BlackRock renewable energy fund: A failed promise for NZ’s green future? From 2023 to 2025, millions of taxpayer dollars have been lost & the promised jobs have failed to materialise. In Aug 2023, the Ardern's Labour party (led at the time by PM Hipkins) partnered with BlackRock to launch a $2 billion climate fund, aiming for 100% renewable electricity by 2030 via solar, wind, green hydrogen, & battery storage. Hailed as a world-first, it promised jobs and innovation. The fund drew on taxpayer money via NZ Green Investment Finance (NZGIF), a Crown entity funded by public resources incl: ACC, KiwiSaver, & the NZ Super Fund. By using NZGIF, the government exposed taxpayers to risks of financial loss if investments failed-& they did. The first investment was SolarZero- a high-risk company with potential. (With better due diligence, this investment would not have gone forward.) The company was first acquired by BlackRock in Nov 2022 for approximately $110M. However, BlackRock later injected a further $147.8M into the business, bringing total capital involved to roughly $257.8M. Of this, NZGIF provided a $145M debt facility, & BlackRock contributed $112.8M. SolarZero aimed to scale solar energy in NZ with a pay-over-time model. But on Nov 26, 2024, BlackRock placed it into liquidation after it missed sales targets. Of the $145M facility, only $115M had been drawn down by the time of collapse. The full $257.8M was not "lost" as a single sum; the total recovery outcome remains uncertain. The collapse left around 160 staff jobless, with $4-5M in unpaid obligations. The loss of at least $115M of taxpayer money — representing roughly 5.75% of the $2B fund ,this was a huge blow to its credibility, leaving taxpayers with little hope of full recovery. Despite SolarZero’s failure, BlackRock charges fees reported at 1.5% annually on invested capital. While the total $50.57M fee figure is (not verified in public records), it is confirmed that BlackRock charged $4.35M on NZGIF’s $145M commitment, taxpayer money for a failed project. The fund now “seems to have gone nowhere,” with no new major projects announced and roughly $1.69 billion idle. BlackRock’s Auckland office, opened in July 2023 with around 10 staff, has delivered nothing new, appearing only to manage the fallout while fees continue. MBIE, overseeing NZ’s energy strategy, has offered no public updates. The lack of transparency raises questions about the government’s choice to partner with BlackRock, potentially delaying NZ’s 100% renewable goal. The financial losses, fees charged on taxpayer money, & lack of outcomes have led to perceptions of a “renewable investment scam,” eroding trust in BlackRock and the government. January 2026: BlackRock abandoned the $2 billion NZ Climate Infrastructure Fund. The fund is now dead. With $1.69 billion left, there was potential to salvage the fund, but this remains a sad tale of risks with global asset managers & taxpayer funds. Claims have also emerged during this time-including allegations of government officials receiving kickbacks from the deal, with a Ardern being named. No evidence has been provided to support these claims. NZGIF has advanced $314,000 in taxpayer money to fund legal investigations into whether SolarZero hid money from creditors by shifting assets into separate trusts before collapsing. NZGIF's chance of recovery in drawn-down funds hinges entirely on whether the court agrees those payments were improper. If the liquidators win, some money may be clawed back. If not, money is likely gone for good.. 2026 BlackRock has abandoned NZ Climate Infrastructure Fund. The fund is now dead.

Neil Edwards

11,474 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

BREAKING.🚨🚨🚨 Federal judge orders Rudy W. Giuliani to hand over most of his possessions and available funds to a receivership controlled by two Georgia election workers whom he allegedly "defamed" following the 2020 presidential election. As reported by the NY Times, Giuliani has seven days to complete the transfer, which includes his New York condo and a vintage Mercedes-Benz once owned by actress Lauren Bacall. The judge also directed him to surrender specific items like furniture, a television, sports memorabilia, jewelry, and 26 watches, one of which Giuliani said was a gift from his grandfather. While Giuliani may hold sentimental value for the watch, "it is not distinctive to the law," wrote Judge Lewis J. Liman of Federal District Court in Manhattan in his Tuesday ruling. For now, Giuliani’s son, Andrew, can retain his father's Yankee World Series rings, pending a legal review of whether they were truly gifted to him, as he claimed. Once the assets are transferred, election workers Ruby Freeman and her daughter Shaye Moss will be able to sell them to begin covering the more than $148 million a federal jury determined Giuliani owes them. The judge also noted that Freeman and Moss are entitled to pursue former President Donald J. Trump for $2 million that Giuliani claims Trump owes him in unpaid legal fees. Freeman and Moss have waited nearly a year for compensation following the alleged damage to their reputations caused by Giuliani, once Trump’s personal attorney and a former New York mayor. Giuliani has reported assets totaling around $10 million. Following the 2020 election, Giuliani accused the women, who had processed ballots that were stored in boxes under a table in Fulton County after election workers were sent home, of election malfeasance. There is video surveillance and a reasonable belief to allege wrongdoing by Fulton County's election workers. This is another travesty of justice against a Trump supporter that has been committed by our weaponized justice system.

Kyle Becker

506,655 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨🚨 Must Read 🚨🚨 📌 What is G.O MS 46? - Issued on 04/04/2022 by the General Administration (SPF 2) Department. - Organise local cadre posts according to the Presidential Order of the New Zonal System in Telangana. 📌 What Happens with G.O MS 46? - Posts in contiguous district cadres are allocated based on population. - In the police department, commissionerates are also considered to organise the ratio of posts. 📌 The Issue: - TSSP aspirants are questioning the perceived inequality in the distribution of posts under G.O MS 46. - Tri Commissionerates (Cyberabad, Rachakonda, Hyderabad) receive 53% of the total posts, while the rest of the state gets 47%. - Discrepancies in cutoff marks are also a concern. 📌 My Views: - G.O MS 46 is based on the New Zonal System, with population counts from the 2011 census. - Police commissionerates are mostly in urban areas, while rural areas come under district SPs. - Urban areas are more populated, leading to a higher job ratio or percentage compared to the rest of the state. - People are questioning why only TSSP & not SPF & SAR CPL for these contiguous posts. These two wings always have fewer vacancies, and conducting them district-wise would result in zero posts for many districts. - TSSP has more vacancies, so to avoid any inequality, posts were divided under G.O MS 46. - Candidates citing 2015 and 2018 recruitment, protested against this 2022 recruitment, wanting it to be conducted as state-level posts. - The government had to follow the new zonal system due to the Presidential Order issued in 2018. - Aspirants also cite differences in cutoff marks, but one simple fact needs to be understood: Urban areas are more populated, but the competition is less, whereas rural areas are less populated but the competition is high. - This results in higher cutoffs in districts & lower cutoffs in commissionerates. You might ask why so many posts are allocated to commissionerates; it's because the zonal system is based on the census. Even if a new census is conducted, the same distribution would likely remain. Political Involvement 🚨 - The previous government had to issue a GO to follow the Presidential Order. - Amid widespread protests, former Minister Sri KT Rama Rao promised to look into the issue and consider changing G.O MS 46. - Meanwhile, leaders of the present ruling party, who were then in opposition, supported the protests and promised an immediate resolution if they came into power. - Students claim that they helped the opposition win elections, but after coming to power, the leaders did not address their demands and sent selected TSSP candidates to training. - Students feel that leaders used them for political mileage, securing political positions but neglecting the students concerns. - G.O MS 46 issued by the then BRS government was legally correct as per the new zonal system under the Presidential Order, but aspirants felt it was affecting them. - The opposition party, which supported the protests, has not reacted since coming to power. - The same party quickly addressed G.O 111 after coming to power but has not responded to G.O MS 46. It seems there are many legal obstacles, and regardless of being AWARE/ UNAWARE, leaders promised to cancel G.O MS 46 before elections,no response over it leading students to protest again. #GO46 #Congress #Students #Portest Students being used for Political Mileage 😔 Attaching videos of students and media below ! Before & After election

భారత రాష్ట్ర సమాచార్

21,003 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce