Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Multinationals on China丨Rystad CEO: China’s Clean-Tech Leadership Powers Global Energy Transition China plays a pivotal role by supplying essential technologies like solar panels and batteries, and holds the largest market share and leads in cost-efficient technologies, noted Jarand Rystad, the founder and CEO of Oslo‑based Rystad Energy, during a...

456,796 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von vladimir martinez
vladimir martinezvor 1 Jahr

China is crushing it in clean tech, shaping the future of global energy. Exciting times ahead!

Profilbild von ela kync
ela kyncvor 1 Jahr

China is really shaping the global energy scene. Excited to see where this clean-tech journey goes!

Profilbild von Kate Cyrus
Kate Cyrusvor 1 Jahr

China drives global clean energy.

Profilbild von ꕤ₊𝓜𝔂𝓪𝓱✧
ꕤ₊𝓜𝔂𝓪𝓱✧vor 1 Jahr

need more coffee

Profilbild von Joelle Chene
Joelle Chenevor 1 Jahr

China's clean-tech game is next level, driving global energy shifts! Exciting times ahead!

Profilbild von Carline Galang
Carline Galangvor 1 Jahr

China is definitely setting the pace in clean tech. Exciting times for the global energy transition!

Profilbild von Gour Sharda
Gour Shardavor 1 Jahr

China is definitely leading the clean-tech game! Exciting times for global energy transition!

Profilbild von Cricket.. Updates 🏏
Cricket.. Updates 🏏vor 1 Jahr

Good

Profilbild von M Tv
M Tvvor 1 Jahr

@Mayeletv Retour assuré

Profilbild von Marivel Pavia
Marivel Paviavor 1 Jahr

China is really shaping the clean-tech scene! Exciting times for the global energy shift!

Ähnliche Videos

The EU has mastered one trick: When it wins, it calls it free trade. When China wins, it calls it overdependence. For decades, European cars, appliances, luxury goods, chemicals, machinery, and high-end consumer products entered the Chinese market. China did not cry that Europe was “distorting” its market or creating “dependency.” China competed. China learned. China upgraded. But the moment Chinese industries became competitive, Europe suddenly discovered “strategic risk.” Solar panels? Europe blocked and punished Chinese solar for years with tariffs and trade barriers. Did that revive Europe’s own solar industry? No. It only made Europe’s energy transition more expensive until it eventually had to reopen the door. Huawei and ZTE? Europe followed Washington’s pressure campaign, ripped out Chinese telecom infrastructure it had already deployed, spent more money, delayed its own networks, and called that “security.” Energy? Europe chose geopolitical obedience, cut itself off from cheap Russian energy, raised its own industrial costs, became more dependent on the U.S., and then watched its companies move across the Atlantic under American subsidies and tariffs. But somehow the problem is still China. Please. Europe’s crisis was not created by Chinese overcapacity. It was created by European complacency, American dependency, ideological industrial policy, expensive energy, and decades of mistaking moral lectures for competitiveness. Now Chinese industries are faster, cheaper, more integrated, and more efficient — from EVs to batteries, solar, electronics, ports, logistics, and manufacturing ecosystems. So Europe invents new language: “Diversification.” “De-risking.” “Overdependence.” “Fair competition.” But strip away the diplomatic costume, and it is just protectionism with Brussels paperwork. China did not force Europe to deindustrialize itself. Europe made its choices. It followed Washington. It sanctioned its own energy base. It taxed its own consumers. It slowed its own innovation. It lectured China while China built. And now it wants China to pay for Europe’s failure to compete. No. China-EU trade is not a charity program for declining European industries. If Europe wants competitiveness, it should build it. Not rename protectionism as “diversification” and expect China to applaud.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

47,207 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat