正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

🚨Must See Video - This is CRAZY!💪First Amendment Protection Agency 💪 💪John Medaglia III (First Amendment Protection Agency) was unjustly arrested in Tupelo, MS in January 2026 while standing on a public sidewalk filming the exterior of Dabbs Cannabis Dispensary. 👮‍♂️Tupelo police officer Douglas Dean arrested him as he...

ScottEnlow's profile picture

👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™

68,194 subscribers

20,957 次观看 • 11 天前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

31 条评论

dewey weber 的头像
dewey weber11 天前

@_1APA Just another pathetic cop. Sickening scum.

Delbert's Ghost 的头像
Delbert's Ghost11 天前

@_1APA Sue his punk ass into bankruptcy

Mark Skipper 的头像
Mark Skipper11 天前

@_1APA He should sue everybody! If Tupelo can't hire decent police officers, they all should pay up. Hiring idiots is no excuse. Plus, police & sheriffs in Texas are now Federalized. They no longer work for the citizens who elected them. The work for DHS & FBI, PERIOD.

Tony Lambert 的头像
Tony Lambert11 天前

@_1APA All charges were dropped. And John is now suing.

Mike 的头像
Mike11 天前

@_1APA Criminal loitering!!! 😅🤣🤣😂😅🤣😂 Fucking clown cop should be fired and in jail. 🤡

Frankie James Pelton 的头像
Frankie James Pelton11 天前

@_1APA The most taistfull audit I’ve ever seen. Not that I’m saying audits have to be tasteful, but this one was. Loved how you let the officer incriminate himself! Well done! Hoping for an outcome that educates that police department!

vew 的头像
vew11 天前

@_1APA The cop personally, he admitted he had the right to video, but still suppressed his right to assemble on a traditional public forum (public sidewalk) due to his feeling of disrespect.

Tom Asiseeitnow 的头像
Tom Asiseeitnow11 天前

Stupid cops, or self-assured bullies in uniform, are a serious financial risk to a city’s taxpayers. The. lawyers who bring federal civil rights violation lawsuits are now very savvy about who gets named in the modern lawsuits, and know what are the specific charges that are plead against each individual defendant. Today the following are sued for failure to train or supervise: the principal bad actor, and all the other cops who were present and did nothing to prevent the violation; the supervisor called to the scene; the watch commander, the Chief of Police, and all IA officers who did not deal with prior officer violations. Then there is the police training officers, and the City Attorney who failed to provide the legal action limit to the trainers. Then the is the Mayor for failure or to supervise Chief, and review training programs; and the City Counsel members for failure to properly fund the police or their training programs. And let’s not forget the business owner or business people who demanded that the police enforce trespass when they had no right or actual authority to do so. Any private security company or business security offices may also be involved. When every one of these people get served with the federal lawsuit papers and have to hire defense counsel the pucker factor goes up and the number of people willing to testify for the plaintiff goes up. A false arrest and any roughing up can mean that the city may have to put a million or more on the table to make a pretrial settlement. This review show who poor training and the hiring of Cops who ignore good training are a big risk that a lot of people who ought to know better are unaware of or ignore.

HottVa 的头像
HottVa11 天前

@_1APA ANOTHER IGNORANT LAWLESS COP!

Turlock 的头像
Turlock11 天前

@_1APA go for the qualified immunity idemnity… thats where its an insurance payout

True Freedom 的头像
True Freedom11 天前

@_1APA He should sue the cop and the police department. This is an easy win.

Kevin 的头像
Kevin11 天前

@_1APA

🇺🇸 Bjørn Videbæk 的头像
🇺🇸 Bjørn Videbæk11 天前

@_1APA The more the cop spoke, the stupider he sounded.

Shawn Sizemore 的头像
Shawn Sizemore11 天前

@_1APA These cops need to start being put in jail period so tired of them acting like domestic terrorist and not SERVANTS

MFAM Tesla 的头像
MFAM Tesla11 天前

@_1APA This is a blatant violation of his rights. So bad in fact the cop should be arrested and charged.

Tim Appleman 的头像
Tim Appleman11 天前

@_1APA Dirty and corrupt and always lying and can't be trusted

LA Veteran 的头像
LA Veteran11 天前

@_1APA I’ll bet the South is ripe for a ton of lawsuits. All ego no brains law enforcement is easy money.

monkey chaser 的头像
monkey chaser11 天前

@_1APA First off who is hiring these low IQ people to be police officers. This dude is as dumb as they come.

👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™ 的头像
👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™11 天前

I think the old barrel-chested guy with the high-pitched voice is the uncredited star of the video; he's certainly the comedy star. 😅

James David 的头像
James David11 天前

@_1APA Fuck these shit cops i hope the get tortured in front of their family before getting hit by a city buss a 55mph

FBblockedme 的头像
FBblockedme11 天前

@_1APA Another high school assistant football coach, team was 0-46 when he went and got himself a shield and a gun.

Blunty 的头像
Blunty11 天前

@_1APA I need to hear to Tupelo with a video camera. Easy money to be made from their police

Charles Batchelor 的头像
Charles Batchelor11 天前

@_1APA He is not on private property and no, it is not loitoring.

jbrowser9876 的头像
jbrowser987611 天前

@_1APA Uhh...cops are allowed to vape on the job? Wtf 🤷

Red 的头像
Red11 天前

@_1APA This is how retarded cops are. They need to be put down.

The Prairie Observer 的头像
The Prairie Observer11 天前

2 out of 3 cops are lazy paper shufflers, dealing with the same handful of low level criminals in their neighborhood over & over, mindlessly doing the same thing every day. The 3rd cop is an arrogant prick who thinks he controls the town & everyone it, while his mouth writes checks his ass can’t cash.

jbrowser9876 的头像
jbrowser987611 天前

@_1APA Cop: "I'm trying to help you out..." Dude you literally arrested him for standing in public.

Popsmoke7007 的头像
Popsmoke700711 天前

@_1APA

ZobarNYC 的头像
ZobarNYC11 天前

@_1APA Fuck these guys

Lady Greeno 的头像
Lady Greeno11 天前

@_1APA They pay protection money They expect results

WordsHavePower 的头像
WordsHavePower11 天前

@_1APA @tupelopress @TupeloPolice BUNCH OF IDIOTS WITH BADGES & GUNS - 💪 LOW IQ MORONS WHO ARE AFRAID OF A CAMERA 📷…. AND NOW THE WORLD KNOWS TUPELO COPS ARE IDIOT TYRANTS

相关视频

👮‍♂️This officer approached a man filming from the public easement in front of a business. He tells him to remove the mask he's wearing and leave the area. Store manager observes from behind the officer. ❓Would this officer act the same if no business had asked him to step in? ❓Question is whether he’s enforcing the law… or just acting as the store’s private security.
1:39

👮‍♂️This officer approached a man filming from the public easement in front of a business. He tells him to remove the mask he's wearing and leave the area. Store manager observes from behind the officer. ❓Would this officer act the same if no business had asked him to step in? ❓Question is whether he’s enforcing the law… or just acting as the store’s private security.

👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™

45,795 次观看 • 15 天前

First Amendment auditors are right. Feelings are not law. At a Chick-fil-A, auditors stood on the public sidewalk filming. The manager called police, claiming they were filming “private property,” making guests uncomfortable, and “scanning” vehicles. She wanted them stopped. Police officer did the correct thing: he explained the actual law. The sidewalk is public property, frequented by the public. It is not illegal to record from that location in Tennessee. He pointed out the clear line—if they stepped onto Chick-fil-A property, they could be asked to leave. While they stayed on the public side, they were free to film. He even noted he could walk around with a camera himself from the same spots. That is the entire ballgame. Public spaces belong to the public. What you can see with your eyes from a public sidewalk, you can generally record. This is core First Amendment territory—freedom of the press and the right to gather information in places open to everyone. Courts have repeatedly upheld this. Discomfort, customer complaints, or a business’s preference do not create a new exception. “It makes people feel followed” is not a legal standard. If it were, news crews, citizen journalists, and anyone with a phone could be shut down every time someone felt uneasy. Yes, the auditors could choose a less confrontational style. Standing there with cameras pointed at a drive-thru and parking lot will annoy people. That is obvious. But annoyance is not illegality. The point of these audits is often to test whether officers and businesses actually know the boundary between private property rights and public rights. In this case the officer did. The manager did not. When people start treating “I don’t like it” as equivalent to “you can’t do that,” the First Amendment erodes. Auditors force the conversation back to the actual rules instead of vibes. That is why they keep doing it—and why this one was clean. Public means public. Record away.
2:38

First Amendment auditors are right. Feelings are not law. At a Chick-fil-A, auditors stood on the public sidewalk filming. The manager called police, claiming they were filming “private property,” making guests uncomfortable, and “scanning” vehicles. She wanted them stopped. Police officer did the correct thing: he explained the actual law. The sidewalk is public property, frequented by the public. It is not illegal to record from that location in Tennessee. He pointed out the clear line—if they stepped onto Chick-fil-A property, they could be asked to leave. While they stayed on the public side, they were free to film. He even noted he could walk around with a camera himself from the same spots. That is the entire ballgame. Public spaces belong to the public. What you can see with your eyes from a public sidewalk, you can generally record. This is core First Amendment territory—freedom of the press and the right to gather information in places open to everyone. Courts have repeatedly upheld this. Discomfort, customer complaints, or a business’s preference do not create a new exception. “It makes people feel followed” is not a legal standard. If it were, news crews, citizen journalists, and anyone with a phone could be shut down every time someone felt uneasy. Yes, the auditors could choose a less confrontational style. Standing there with cameras pointed at a drive-thru and parking lot will annoy people. That is obvious. But annoyance is not illegality. The point of these audits is often to test whether officers and businesses actually know the boundary between private property rights and public rights. In this case the officer did. The manager did not. When people start treating “I don’t like it” as equivalent to “you can’t do that,” the First Amendment erodes. Auditors force the conversation back to the actual rules instead of vibes. That is why they keep doing it—and why this one was clean. Public means public. Record away.

DocumentingLibs

69,376 次观看 • 1 个月前

🎥Detained in Dothan for recording ambulances running a stop sign. Jeff Gray was on a public sidewalk in Dothan, AL filming ambulances running a stop sign near Southeast Health. Hospital employees called police when they saw him. Officer Kevin Fischer (#1146) showed up, and with no questions asked detained him as a “suspicious person". He gave him a stern taking down to, called him a "First Amendment predator" and demanded ID because he was “creating a disturbance.” Gray was filming public activity from a public sidewalk. No crime. No arrest. Just a report and an ID check under protest. Photography is not a crime. ❓Did Officer Fisher actually have reasonable suspicion—or just an attitude? ❓Why did Officer Fisher say Gray was “creating a disturbance” inside the building when he was only standing outside on the sidewalk? ❓Did it seem to you like Officer Fisher had his mind made up about Jeff Gray before he even exited his vehicle?
10:04

🎥Detained in Dothan for recording ambulances running a stop sign. Jeff Gray was on a public sidewalk in Dothan, AL filming ambulances running a stop sign near Southeast Health. Hospital employees called police when they saw him. Officer Kevin Fischer (#1146) showed up, and with no questions asked detained him as a “suspicious person". He gave him a stern taking down to, called him a "First Amendment predator" and demanded ID because he was “creating a disturbance.” Gray was filming public activity from a public sidewalk. No crime. No arrest. Just a report and an ID check under protest. Photography is not a crime. ❓Did Officer Fisher actually have reasonable suspicion—or just an attitude? ❓Why did Officer Fisher say Gray was “creating a disturbance” inside the building when he was only standing outside on the sidewalk? ❓Did it seem to you like Officer Fisher had his mind made up about Jeff Gray before he even exited his vehicle?

👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™

28,546 次观看 • 4 天前

🚨In Sept 2018, First Amendment auditor Anselmo Morales-Torres filmed the RI National Guard facility from a public sidewalk in Cranston. 👮‍♂️Female Officer Andrea P. Comella responded to a “suspicious person” call, demanded ID multiple times, and told him refusal would be obstruction of justice. He refused, stating he had the right to record a public building unmolested from a public sidewalk. He was grabbed in a pain compliance wrist restraint, detained, patted down, handcuffed, made to sit on the ground and then charged. All because he was recording in public. Anselmo Morales-Torres was initially charged with obstruction of justice and disorderly conduct. 😡He ultimately took a plea deal to make the nightmare go away. After he spent roughly 90 days in jail. He accepted a plea deal and was sentenced to one year of probation. ❓Which person in this video committed a crime?
7:53

🚨In Sept 2018, First Amendment auditor Anselmo Morales-Torres filmed the RI National Guard facility from a public sidewalk in Cranston. 👮‍♂️Female Officer Andrea P. Comella responded to a “suspicious person” call, demanded ID multiple times, and told him refusal would be obstruction of justice. He refused, stating he had the right to record a public building unmolested from a public sidewalk. He was grabbed in a pain compliance wrist restraint, detained, patted down, handcuffed, made to sit on the ground and then charged. All because he was recording in public. Anselmo Morales-Torres was initially charged with obstruction of justice and disorderly conduct. 😡He ultimately took a plea deal to make the nightmare go away. After he spent roughly 90 days in jail. He accepted a plea deal and was sentenced to one year of probation. ❓Which person in this video committed a crime?

👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™

11,644 次观看 • 29 天前

📹A man was recording from public property outside a government complex in Coventry, RI. A Rhode Island Capitol Police officer walked up and told him to stop — said filming wasn’t allowed and he was adamant about it. The man asked for a supervisor. One came out, heard both sides, and said he could keep filming as long as he stayed on public property. The Capitol officer turned and walked off down the highway, visibly angry. Filming police from a public sidewalk is legal. Policy is not the law. ❓What happens when an officer is 100% sure — and 100% wrong? ❓Why do the wrong officers always sound the most certain?
4:54

📹A man was recording from public property outside a government complex in Coventry, RI. A Rhode Island Capitol Police officer walked up and told him to stop — said filming wasn’t allowed and he was adamant about it. The man asked for a supervisor. One came out, heard both sides, and said he could keep filming as long as he stayed on public property. The Capitol officer turned and walked off down the highway, visibly angry. Filming police from a public sidewalk is legal. Policy is not the law. ❓What happens when an officer is 100% sure — and 100% wrong? ❓Why do the wrong officers always sound the most certain?

👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™

106,581 次观看 • 16 天前

He’s filming everyone at the market, but the police say there’s nothing they can do. Whose side are you on? A male videographer (the "auditor"), who is wearing a disguise for anonymity, is filming at an outdoor market. He is confronted by a market organizer (Kaylee Dolan) regarding his filming of vendors and attendees. A law enforcement officer arrives to mediate the dispute. ​The organizer expresses concern that the videographer is making vendors and patrons uncomfortable and asks him to stop or leave. The videographer asserts his right to film in a public area, refusing to comply with her request. ​The responding officer confirms that the videographer is in a public space where he has a legal right to record. The officer acknowledges the organizer's frustration but explains that, as no crime is being committed, he cannot compel the man to stop filming or force him to leave. ​The tension arises from the intersection of constitutional rights and personal expectations of privacy. ​Under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, individuals generally have a protected right to film in public spaces (such as sidewalks, public parks, and plazas). This includes the right to film government officials and police officers performing their duties, as well as things that are plainly visible from those public areas. ​In general, there is no "reasonable expectation of privacy" in a public space. If something can be seen by the naked eye from a location where a person is legally permitted to be, it is typically legal to photograph or record it. ​While filming is a protected activity, it is not absolute. If filming crosses the line into harassment, stalking, or disorderly conduct—or if it is done to "clandestinely" capture private or intimate areas, it can become illegal. In this specific interaction, the officer determined that the videographer’s actions did not meet the legal threshold for a crime, which is why he could not intervene. ​If the market were held on private property rather than public land, the owners or organizers would have the right to set rules regarding photography or to ask people to leave. If someone refuses to leave private property after being asked, they can be cited for trespassing. The officer's inability to remove the videographer suggests that the location was either public property or that the organizer lacked the legal authority to exclude him from that specific area.
6:03

He’s filming everyone at the market, but the police say there’s nothing they can do. Whose side are you on? A male videographer (the "auditor"), who is wearing a disguise for anonymity, is filming at an outdoor market. He is confronted by a market organizer (Kaylee Dolan) regarding his filming of vendors and attendees. A law enforcement officer arrives to mediate the dispute. ​The organizer expresses concern that the videographer is making vendors and patrons uncomfortable and asks him to stop or leave. The videographer asserts his right to film in a public area, refusing to comply with her request. ​The responding officer confirms that the videographer is in a public space where he has a legal right to record. The officer acknowledges the organizer's frustration but explains that, as no crime is being committed, he cannot compel the man to stop filming or force him to leave. ​The tension arises from the intersection of constitutional rights and personal expectations of privacy. ​Under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, individuals generally have a protected right to film in public spaces (such as sidewalks, public parks, and plazas). This includes the right to film government officials and police officers performing their duties, as well as things that are plainly visible from those public areas. ​In general, there is no "reasonable expectation of privacy" in a public space. If something can be seen by the naked eye from a location where a person is legally permitted to be, it is typically legal to photograph or record it. ​While filming is a protected activity, it is not absolute. If filming crosses the line into harassment, stalking, or disorderly conduct—or if it is done to "clandestinely" capture private or intimate areas, it can become illegal. In this specific interaction, the officer determined that the videographer’s actions did not meet the legal threshold for a crime, which is why he could not intervene. ​If the market were held on private property rather than public land, the owners or organizers would have the right to set rules regarding photography or to ask people to leave. If someone refuses to leave private property after being asked, they can be cited for trespassing. The officer's inability to remove the videographer suggests that the location was either public property or that the organizer lacked the legal authority to exclude him from that specific area.

✨️Serenitee♡Sam✨️

42,895 次观看 • 3 个月前

Brooklyn: Flatbush Avenue & Woodruff Avenue, new video shows the moments leading up to the arrest of a 35-year-old woman who allegedly punched a police officer in the head while officers were dispersing a large disorderly crowd during the Jamaican Parade on Saturday. According to police, the officer suffered pain and injury after being punched in the head. As reported on NYC Scoop, the suspect was arrested following the incident and charged with Assault on a Police Officer, Resisting Arrest, Obstruction of Governmental Administration in the 2nd Degree, Harassment in the 1st Degree, and Disorderly Conduct. DISCLAIMER: This video only shows a small portion of the incident and does not capture the entire interaction. The camera is also not always facing the woman who was arrested, and the alleged punch is not visible in the video. Our report regarding the alleged assault is based on information provided to us by the NYPD.
2:20

Brooklyn: Flatbush Avenue & Woodruff Avenue, new video shows the moments leading up to the arrest of a 35-year-old woman who allegedly punched a police officer in the head while officers were dispersing a large disorderly crowd during the Jamaican Parade on Saturday. According to police, the officer suffered pain and injury after being punched in the head. As reported on NYC Scoop, the suspect was arrested following the incident and charged with Assault on a Police Officer, Resisting Arrest, Obstruction of Governmental Administration in the 2nd Degree, Harassment in the 1st Degree, and Disorderly Conduct. DISCLAIMER: This video only shows a small portion of the incident and does not capture the entire interaction. The camera is also not always facing the woman who was arrested, and the alleged punch is not visible in the video. Our report regarding the alleged assault is based on information provided to us by the NYPD.

NYC Scoop

290,725 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨August 2021 — Coeur d’Alene, Idaho. State-run liquor store. Amagansett Press (Jason Gutterman) and his son Jason is standing ~20 feet from the door on the public walkway/parking area, filming. He never enters the store. Staff come out, claim he’s “bothering customers,” tell him to get off “their property,” and call police when he refuses. Officer Kaiafa arrives, asks staff if they want him trespassed, then tells Gutterman she needs his ID to formally trespass him and enter it in the system. He points out it’s a state-owned liquor store, he’s on public property, committed no crime, and there is no lawful basis to trespass him from a public sidewalk. He asks for the property line and a supervisor. She continues demanding ID. He produces it under threat of arrest/detainment. She runs it, hands it back, and leaves. No arrest. No citation. Filming in public from public property is legal. A government liquor store’s sidewalk is not private property. Staff dislike of cameras does not create a crime or a valid trespass. ❓Why are police always enforcing employees feelings instead of the law? ❓Is “they want him trespassed” actually probable cause to force a person to ID themselves with name and DOB? ❓Why do police always take the employee’s side over the Constitution?
6:50

🚨August 2021 — Coeur d’Alene, Idaho. State-run liquor store. Amagansett Press (Jason Gutterman) and his son Jason is standing ~20 feet from the door on the public walkway/parking area, filming. He never enters the store. Staff come out, claim he’s “bothering customers,” tell him to get off “their property,” and call police when he refuses. Officer Kaiafa arrives, asks staff if they want him trespassed, then tells Gutterman she needs his ID to formally trespass him and enter it in the system. He points out it’s a state-owned liquor store, he’s on public property, committed no crime, and there is no lawful basis to trespass him from a public sidewalk. He asks for the property line and a supervisor. She continues demanding ID. He produces it under threat of arrest/detainment. She runs it, hands it back, and leaves. No arrest. No citation. Filming in public from public property is legal. A government liquor store’s sidewalk is not private property. Staff dislike of cameras does not create a crime or a valid trespass. ❓Why are police always enforcing employees feelings instead of the law? ❓Is “they want him trespassed” actually probable cause to force a person to ID themselves with name and DOB? ❓Why do police always take the employee’s side over the Constitution?

👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™

81,514 次观看 • 5 天前

🚨When a Sheriff Tells a Flat Out Lie on Camera. On June 4, 2020, First Amendment auditor George Metz II (Rogue Nation) and a colleague filmed government buildings in Dothan, Ala., from public sidewalks, including the exterior of a police building. Houston County Sheriff Donald Valenza approached, told Metz had broken the law by filming their building, detained him, demanded ID, and said he was conducting an investigation. Sheriff Valenza said, "You're doing something illegal right now by filming government buildings." (Bold faced lie.) Metz said there was no reasonable suspicion for the stop. In May 2022 Metz sued Valenza in federal court for Fourth Amendment illegal seizure and First Amendment retaliation. A magistrate recommended denying Valenza qualified immunity at the motion-to-dismiss stage, finding Metz had plausibly alleged a clearly established rights violation based on the complaint and video. The district judge adopted that and let the case proceed. The case did not go to a public merits ruling. On Oct. 10, 2024, it was dismissed with prejudice “on the terms set out and agreed to by the parties”—a settlement dismissal. Filming public buildings from a public sidewalk is generally protected; the dispute was whether the detention and ID demand were lawful. ❓Are First Amendment auditors journalists, agitators, or both? ❓What does the video actually show Sheriff Valenza doing? ❓Should a sheriff and his gang of deputies be able to detain you on a public sidewalk just for filming a police building?
13:08

🚨When a Sheriff Tells a Flat Out Lie on Camera. On June 4, 2020, First Amendment auditor George Metz II (Rogue Nation) and a colleague filmed government buildings in Dothan, Ala., from public sidewalks, including the exterior of a police building. Houston County Sheriff Donald Valenza approached, told Metz had broken the law by filming their building, detained him, demanded ID, and said he was conducting an investigation. Sheriff Valenza said, "You're doing something illegal right now by filming government buildings." (Bold faced lie.) Metz said there was no reasonable suspicion for the stop. In May 2022 Metz sued Valenza in federal court for Fourth Amendment illegal seizure and First Amendment retaliation. A magistrate recommended denying Valenza qualified immunity at the motion-to-dismiss stage, finding Metz had plausibly alleged a clearly established rights violation based on the complaint and video. The district judge adopted that and let the case proceed. The case did not go to a public merits ruling. On Oct. 10, 2024, it was dismissed with prejudice “on the terms set out and agreed to by the parties”—a settlement dismissal. Filming public buildings from a public sidewalk is generally protected; the dispute was whether the detention and ID demand were lawful. ❓Are First Amendment auditors journalists, agitators, or both? ❓What does the video actually show Sheriff Valenza doing? ❓Should a sheriff and his gang of deputies be able to detain you on a public sidewalk just for filming a police building?

👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™

44,541 次观看 • 3 天前

👮‍♀️She Wanted ID and Wasn't Taking No for an Answer 🎥1A auditor Angel “Bartholomew” Moses (Kansas City Accountability) was filming from the public sidewalk outside a bank on Ward Parkway in Kansas City, MO when employees called the police. Officer Sarah Holland #5826 cuffed him after he refused ID and interfered with his camera. He asked for a sergeant. The sergeant arrived, checked the facts, and told Holland she could force ID only if there was a crime. There wasn’t. The bank declined trespassing charges because he never left the sidewalk. He was released. Filming from a public sidewalk is not a crime. ❓Did the sergeant save Officer Holland from making an even bigger mistake? ❓Do you think Officer Holland actually believed she could force ID with no crime—or was she just going with her feelings?
9:15

👮‍♀️She Wanted ID and Wasn't Taking No for an Answer 🎥1A auditor Angel “Bartholomew” Moses (Kansas City Accountability) was filming from the public sidewalk outside a bank on Ward Parkway in Kansas City, MO when employees called the police. Officer Sarah Holland #5826 cuffed him after he refused ID and interfered with his camera. He asked for a sergeant. The sergeant arrived, checked the facts, and told Holland she could force ID only if there was a crime. There wasn’t. The bank declined trespassing charges because he never left the sidewalk. He was released. Filming from a public sidewalk is not a crime. ❓Did the sergeant save Officer Holland from making an even bigger mistake? ❓Do you think Officer Holland actually believed she could force ID with no crime—or was she just going with her feelings?

👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™

50,454 次观看 • 10 天前

🚔Cedar Rapids. Public street. A parked squad car. A camera. A First Amendment auditor is filming a police vehicle from the sidewalk — public property, public view, no touching, no blocking, no crime. Then Investigator Matt Denlinger, badge 830, steps into the frame. Not the marked-unit traffic stop version of the job. The cold-case guy with no visible police ID. And the first move is the oldest line in these videos: 🤨I need to see your ID. The auditor doesn’t bite. Filming a public car on a public street isn’t a crime. Iowa doesn’t have a blanket stop-and-identify law for a consensual encounter. You can ask. They can walk. Policy is not statute. Denlinger wants a name. The camera wants a badge number. That’s the whole dance. No cuffs. No ticket. No Gazette headline. Just a detective claiming a camera is reasonable suspicion. Here’s the rule they keep teaching the hard way: the First Amendment doesn’t care how weird it looks to stand on a sidewalk and film a government car. Suspicious is not the same as illegal. A request is not a command. And “because I said so” is not probable cause. Watch the clip. Count how many times the officer asks for ID. Then count the crimes. ❓What would you have told Denlinger? ❓Is filming a police car reasonable suspicion of a crime?
2:45

🚔Cedar Rapids. Public street. A parked squad car. A camera. A First Amendment auditor is filming a police vehicle from the sidewalk — public property, public view, no touching, no blocking, no crime. Then Investigator Matt Denlinger, badge 830, steps into the frame. Not the marked-unit traffic stop version of the job. The cold-case guy with no visible police ID. And the first move is the oldest line in these videos: 🤨I need to see your ID. The auditor doesn’t bite. Filming a public car on a public street isn’t a crime. Iowa doesn’t have a blanket stop-and-identify law for a consensual encounter. You can ask. They can walk. Policy is not statute. Denlinger wants a name. The camera wants a badge number. That’s the whole dance. No cuffs. No ticket. No Gazette headline. Just a detective claiming a camera is reasonable suspicion. Here’s the rule they keep teaching the hard way: the First Amendment doesn’t care how weird it looks to stand on a sidewalk and film a government car. Suspicious is not the same as illegal. A request is not a command. And “because I said so” is not probable cause. Watch the clip. Count how many times the officer asks for ID. Then count the crimes. ❓What would you have told Denlinger? ❓Is filming a police car reasonable suspicion of a crime?

👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™

49,730 次观看 • 20 天前

Swedish police chase of a suspect driving a tuned up motorbike. The suspect was caught and fined but the real story is about the police officer who was charged and found guilty of Police misconduct as he endangered the suspects and others life. He was first freed in the District Court but found guilty in the Appeals Court and Supreme Court found him guilty as the law says a police officer can only chase a suspect on a motorbike if that person is suspect of a serious crime, which driving a tuned up motorbike is not. The police officer was supported by the Police Union, his colleagues and members of the public who later crowdfunded his fines and legal bills.
2:52

Swedish police chase of a suspect driving a tuned up motorbike. The suspect was caught and fined but the real story is about the police officer who was charged and found guilty of Police misconduct as he endangered the suspects and others life. He was first freed in the District Court but found guilty in the Appeals Court and Supreme Court found him guilty as the law says a police officer can only chase a suspect on a motorbike if that person is suspect of a serious crime, which driving a tuned up motorbike is not. The police officer was supported by the Police Union, his colleagues and members of the public who later crowdfunded his fines and legal bills.

Birch Brother 🪓

47,206 次观看 • 4 个月前

Garissa is boiling. Ahmed Mohamed was reportedly shot by a police officer today after being called to help a friend who had been arrested. He arrives, and the officer tells him: “You’re the one I was looking for”, then shoots him. No arrest. No due process. Just execution. Today, locals confronted police and said what many Kenyans are thinking. How does a citizen become a target like this? Are we under the rule of law or the rule of the gun? This is not an isolated case. It’s a pattern. Video of an MCA explaining what happened below. Video credit - Ahmed kosar
4:32

Garissa is boiling. Ahmed Mohamed was reportedly shot by a police officer today after being called to help a friend who had been arrested. He arrives, and the officer tells him: “You’re the one I was looking for”, then shoots him. No arrest. No due process. Just execution. Today, locals confronted police and said what many Kenyans are thinking. How does a citizen become a target like this? Are we under the rule of law or the rule of the gun? This is not an isolated case. It’s a pattern. Video of an MCA explaining what happened below. Video credit - Ahmed kosar

Sholla Ard 🇰🇪

50,752 次观看 • 5 个月前

A disturbing incident has gone viral on social media. According to the video, a police vehicle was parked on the roadside when the officer suddenly opened the door without checking for oncoming traffic. A motorcyclist collided with the door, resulting in an accident. What happened next is even more concerning. The officer is seen allegedly slapping and hitting the biker with a baton instead of helping him. If the video accurately reflects the incident, responsibility does not appear to lie with just one person. Opening a vehicle door onto a busy road without first checking for approaching traffic can itself create a dangerous situation. No matter who is at fault, violence is not an acceptable response. Law enforcement officers are expected to remain calm, act professionally, and handle such situations according to the law—not with physical force. Incidents like these can damage public trust in the police. Accountability, fairness, and respectful conduct are essential to maintaining confidence in those entrusted with enforcing the law.
1:20

A disturbing incident has gone viral on social media. According to the video, a police vehicle was parked on the roadside when the officer suddenly opened the door without checking for oncoming traffic. A motorcyclist collided with the door, resulting in an accident. What happened next is even more concerning. The officer is seen allegedly slapping and hitting the biker with a baton instead of helping him. If the video accurately reflects the incident, responsibility does not appear to lie with just one person. Opening a vehicle door onto a busy road without first checking for approaching traffic can itself create a dangerous situation. No matter who is at fault, violence is not an acceptable response. Law enforcement officers are expected to remain calm, act professionally, and handle such situations according to the law—not with physical force. Incidents like these can damage public trust in the police. Accountability, fairness, and respectful conduct are essential to maintaining confidence in those entrusted with enforcing the law.

SAFFRON LION

300,736 次观看 • 1 个月前

On behalf of the largest police news outlet in the world, we're officially calling for the resignation or termination of this officer IMMEDIATELY. A female Fort Worth police officer was caught on camera threatening to ticket a retired federal law enforcement officer and Christian street preacher for “offensive speech.” The officer told the man that if someone is offended by his preaching, then “we have a problem” and said she would issue him a ticket. When he asked if she was really going to ticket him for offensive speech, she replied, “Yes, I am.” This is a blatant violation of the First Amendment. Police officers do not have the authority to ticket people for speech that offends others. That is the exact opposite of how freedom of speech works in America. The fact that this officer targeted a retired federal law enforcement officer who was simply preaching makes this even more unacceptable. Departments that employ officers who openly disregard the Constitution need to clean house. This kind of behavior erodes public trust and makes every good officer’s job harder. Pass this along so more people see what is happening on our streets. #FortWorthPD #FirstAmendment
1:02

On behalf of the largest police news outlet in the world, we're officially calling for the resignation or termination of this officer IMMEDIATELY. A female Fort Worth police officer was caught on camera threatening to ticket a retired federal law enforcement officer and Christian street preacher for “offensive speech.” The officer told the man that if someone is offended by his preaching, then “we have a problem” and said she would issue him a ticket. When he asked if she was really going to ticket him for offensive speech, she replied, “Yes, I am.” This is a blatant violation of the First Amendment. Police officers do not have the authority to ticket people for speech that offends others. That is the exact opposite of how freedom of speech works in America. The fact that this officer targeted a retired federal law enforcement officer who was simply preaching makes this even more unacceptable. Departments that employ officers who openly disregard the Constitution need to clean house. This kind of behavior erodes public trust and makes every good officer’s job harder. Pass this along so more people see what is happening on our streets. #FortWorthPD #FirstAmendment

Blue Lives Matter

1,532,572 次观看 • 2 个月前

Claremore, Oklahoma. U.S. Post Office sidewalk. January 2018. A man is recording and taking pictures in public on the north side of the post office. Claremore PD Officer Cassie Grettner detains him over complaints that someone was looking into vehicles. He asks her name and badge number. She refuses.“You give me your name, I’ll give you mine.” He tells her he’s not a public official. She is. She still won’t say her name or badge number. He asks again. She still won’t. He asks what crime she suspects him of committing. She cites a “disturbance.” He’s on a public sidewalk filming. That’s not a crime. Sgt. Book arrives. Same standoff. She still hasn’t identified herself to the man she’s detaining. No arrest. The encounter was filmed. Recording police in public is legal. A cop who detains someone and then refuses to identify herself is the part that doesn’t add up. ❓Why would Officer Cassie Grettner detain you and then refuse to tell you her name? ❓If a police officer won’t identify herself, is she even acting as a police officer?
9:51

Claremore, Oklahoma. U.S. Post Office sidewalk. January 2018. A man is recording and taking pictures in public on the north side of the post office. Claremore PD Officer Cassie Grettner detains him over complaints that someone was looking into vehicles. He asks her name and badge number. She refuses.“You give me your name, I’ll give you mine.” He tells her he’s not a public official. She is. She still won’t say her name or badge number. He asks again. She still won’t. He asks what crime she suspects him of committing. She cites a “disturbance.” He’s on a public sidewalk filming. That’s not a crime. Sgt. Book arrives. Same standoff. She still hasn’t identified herself to the man she’s detaining. No arrest. The encounter was filmed. Recording police in public is legal. A cop who detains someone and then refuses to identify herself is the part that doesn’t add up. ❓Why would Officer Cassie Grettner detain you and then refuse to tell you her name? ❓If a police officer won’t identify herself, is she even acting as a police officer?

👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™

55,015 次观看 • 19 天前

🚨Officer claims she’s investigating a “potential crime” after an anonymous caller reported an unknown man walking a public sidewalk taking pictures of houses. She thinks that’s enough to demand his ID. Photography from a public sidewalk is not a crime. ❓Should an anonymous call alone give police the right to demand your ID? ❓When did walking on a sidewalk with a camera become suspicious activity? ❓Would you hand over your ID in this situation?
2:51

🚨Officer claims she’s investigating a “potential crime” after an anonymous caller reported an unknown man walking a public sidewalk taking pictures of houses. She thinks that’s enough to demand his ID. Photography from a public sidewalk is not a crime. ❓Should an anonymous call alone give police the right to demand your ID? ❓When did walking on a sidewalk with a camera become suspicious activity? ❓Would you hand over your ID in this situation?

👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™

247,559 次观看 • 15 天前

A teen who was assaulted and slammed by a Warren police officer during booking has filed a $50 million lawsuit. The lawsuit was filed this week by Fieger Law. Matthew Rodriguez, 48, an officer with 14 years on the force, was charged Friday with assault and battery charges. Warren police announced Monday that he had been fired According to the lawsuit, the teen suffered physical and mental damage due to excessive force, and the city of Warren failed to properly train the officer. "Officer Matthew, with the specific intent to intimidate and/or harass Plaintiff, as a result of his race and/or ethnicity, caused physical contact with Plaintiff by striking him in the head and/or face with a fist and pulling him off the ground by his hair," the lawsuit reads. The lawsuit also says that the two other officers in the video failed to intervene and help the teen. “This is one of the most flagrant cases of police misconduct I’ve seen in my entire career as a trial attorney. The sheer violence and disregard for human life that these three officers showed is despicable and cannot be tolerated," said James Harrington of Fieger Law. The incident happened early this week at the Warren police department. The video shows the officer punching and grabbing the 19-year-old by his locs before slamming & launching him into his cell. Warren Police Commissioner Bill Dwyer says an investigation was launched after the two officers in the video stepped up and told a supervisor about the incident. One officer was telling Rodriguez "That's enough" multiple times in an attempt to make the officer stop, Dwyer said. At first, they did not know why the officer was attacking him. Within a week, the officer was arrested, charged, and put on unpaid administrative leave, said Dwyer. The officer in the video also was out of policy and was not wearing bodycam. The officer has a lengthy history of alleged accessive force. He currently has two pending lawsuits.
1:05

A teen who was assaulted and slammed by a Warren police officer during booking has filed a $50 million lawsuit. The lawsuit was filed this week by Fieger Law. Matthew Rodriguez, 48, an officer with 14 years on the force, was charged Friday with assault and battery charges. Warren police announced Monday that he had been fired According to the lawsuit, the teen suffered physical and mental damage due to excessive force, and the city of Warren failed to properly train the officer. "Officer Matthew, with the specific intent to intimidate and/or harass Plaintiff, as a result of his race and/or ethnicity, caused physical contact with Plaintiff by striking him in the head and/or face with a fist and pulling him off the ground by his hair," the lawsuit reads. The lawsuit also says that the two other officers in the video failed to intervene and help the teen. “This is one of the most flagrant cases of police misconduct I’ve seen in my entire career as a trial attorney. The sheer violence and disregard for human life that these three officers showed is despicable and cannot be tolerated," said James Harrington of Fieger Law. The incident happened early this week at the Warren police department. The video shows the officer punching and grabbing the 19-year-old by his locs before slamming & launching him into his cell. Warren Police Commissioner Bill Dwyer says an investigation was launched after the two officers in the video stepped up and told a supervisor about the incident. One officer was telling Rodriguez "That's enough" multiple times in an attempt to make the officer stop, Dwyer said. At first, they did not know why the officer was attacking him. Within a week, the officer was arrested, charged, and put on unpaid administrative leave, said Dwyer. The officer in the video also was out of policy and was not wearing bodycam. The officer has a lengthy history of alleged accessive force. He currently has two pending lawsuits.

Music is Life

1,891,964 次观看 • 1 年前

It's astounding how ignorant this female cop is on the law. When public photography gets treated as a potential crime, knowing your rights makes all the difference. ​In this bodycam encounter out of Kansas City, Missouri, KCPD Officer Sarah Holland responded to a call regarding an independent journalist filming near bank branches along Ward Parkway. Prior to arrival, dispatch discussions framed the activity as potentially "casing" the locations, leading to immediate tension upon contact. ​When Officer Holland arrived, she demanded the journalist’s identification. The journalist maintained that he was standing strictly on a public sidewalk, gathering content for a story, and declined to provide ID without reasonable, articulable suspicion of an actual crime. Despite his assertion of First Amendment rights and city easement protections, Officer Holland placed him in handcuffs, insisting he was legally detained for refusing to leave after the bank requested it. ​The situation escalated until a field supervisor arrived on scene to assess the stop. After questioning bank management and surveying the area, the supervisor stepped in to correct the procedural missteps, clarifying that standing on a public sidewalk to record is constitutionally protected activity and that police cannot simply demand identification or detain an individual without reasonable suspicion of criminal conduct. ​Ultimately, because the journalist remained in public space he was uncuffed and released without identifying himself or facing charges. ​A textbook breakdown of public easement rights, stop-and-identify standards, and why supervisor intervention matters on the street. The scary part is you have to wonder how many people's rights has this woman violated through her career. She needs re-education on the constitution that she swore to protect.
12:48

It's astounding how ignorant this female cop is on the law. When public photography gets treated as a potential crime, knowing your rights makes all the difference. ​In this bodycam encounter out of Kansas City, Missouri, KCPD Officer Sarah Holland responded to a call regarding an independent journalist filming near bank branches along Ward Parkway. Prior to arrival, dispatch discussions framed the activity as potentially "casing" the locations, leading to immediate tension upon contact. ​When Officer Holland arrived, she demanded the journalist’s identification. The journalist maintained that he was standing strictly on a public sidewalk, gathering content for a story, and declined to provide ID without reasonable, articulable suspicion of an actual crime. Despite his assertion of First Amendment rights and city easement protections, Officer Holland placed him in handcuffs, insisting he was legally detained for refusing to leave after the bank requested it. ​The situation escalated until a field supervisor arrived on scene to assess the stop. After questioning bank management and surveying the area, the supervisor stepped in to correct the procedural missteps, clarifying that standing on a public sidewalk to record is constitutionally protected activity and that police cannot simply demand identification or detain an individual without reasonable suspicion of criminal conduct. ​Ultimately, because the journalist remained in public space he was uncuffed and released without identifying himself or facing charges. ​A textbook breakdown of public easement rights, stop-and-identify standards, and why supervisor intervention matters on the street. The scary part is you have to wonder how many people's rights has this woman violated through her career. She needs re-education on the constitution that she swore to protect.

Giggling Ganon

22,974 次观看 • 1 个月前

NEW: New York man punches an officer and puts him in a chokehold before being arrested Officer Hyvarinen responded alone to Hanover Road after a disturbance call Bodycam video shows him approaching Daniel Morris and telling him he was being detained Police said Morris first raised his arms to surrender, then punched the officer Both had minor facial injuries Morris was arrested and charged with assault on public safety personnel, resisting arrest and disorderly conduct He was held on a $75,000 bond and taken to a hospital for evaluation
1:30

NEW: New York man punches an officer and puts him in a chokehold before being arrested Officer Hyvarinen responded alone to Hanover Road after a disturbance call Bodycam video shows him approaching Daniel Morris and telling him he was being detained Police said Morris first raised his arms to surrender, then punched the officer Both had minor facial injuries Morris was arrested and charged with assault on public safety personnel, resisting arrest and disorderly conduct He was held on a $75,000 bond and taken to a hospital for evaluation

Unlimited L's

305,927 次观看 • 9 个月前