正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Must watch to understand how “peer reviewed” science is fully captured.

aussie17

95,419 subscribers

207,976 次观看 • 3 年前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

8 条评论

aussie17 的头像

aussie173 年前

source

Jimmy HB ✱ 的头像

Jimmy HB ✱3 年前

More like 'peer approved' aye?

MWR 的头像

MWR3 年前

Ommission, selection and over-saturation of information have been successful strategies of telling the truth and nothing but the truth but just not the whole truth. It's an accepted form of opaque authoritarian transparency that occurs in all fields of study. Sadly.

OakMauler "Last peer reviewed - 1994" 的头像

OakMauler "Last peer reviewed - 1994"3 年前

Yep, and peer review was never science, just a feedback loop that degenerates... like the vaxx.

Jessica Rose 🤙 的头像

Jessica Rose 🤙3 年前

@NickHudsonCT @bell00david so important

Guy Jordan 的头像

Guy Jordan3 年前

@TLAVagabond "Peer Reviewed" LEADS people to think everyone practicing a certain scientific specialty read the damn thing and agreed with it. It becomes "Science by Plebiscite," or, as Logic would describe it, the fallacy of "Appeal to the Majority." In fact, no one knows who read it.

Betsy McDonel Herr, Ph.D. 的头像

Betsy McDonel Herr, Ph.D.3 年前

@JoshWalkos @drjasonfung is a treasure. @ProfTimNoakes

VERBUM VINCET 的头像

VERBUM VINCET3 年前

There's a fundamental general rule that allows you to spot this problem in advance. This problem only occurs with metadata, data about data. It never occurs with direct data, direct observation, but people stopped believing their own eyes nowadays.

相关视频

RFK Jr. shuts down Senator Angela Alsobrooks when she calls him "dangerous" for citing peer-reviewed medical studies. RFK Jr: "Do you think science is dangerous, Senator? This is published, peer-reviewed studies." Alsobrooks: "I yield."

RFK Jr. shuts down Senator Angela Alsobrooks when she calls him "dangerous" for citing peer-reviewed medical studies. RFK Jr: "Do you think science is dangerous, Senator? This is published, peer-reviewed studies." Alsobrooks: "I yield."

Libs of TikTok

626,193 次观看 • 1 年前

Science without question isn’t science — it’s religion. RFK Jr.: 'There are over 5,000 peer-reviewed studies detailing serious COVID vaccine injuries — especially in young people, from myocarditis, pericarditis, blood clots, aneurysms.' How many more studies before the truth breaks through?

Science without question isn’t science — it’s religion. RFK Jr.: 'There are over 5,000 peer-reviewed studies detailing serious COVID vaccine injuries — especially in young people, from myocarditis, pericarditis, blood clots, aneurysms.' How many more studies before the truth breaks through?

Children’s Health Defense

92,022 次观看 • 11 个月前

LOOK WHAT WENT DOWN IN NEW MEXICO BEFORE THE FLOODS 🌊 😳😳😳 WATCH WHOLE VIDEO! POLITICIANS looking to understand what’s really contributing to extreme weather… WATCH THIS VIDEO 🛑🚨‼️ Peer reviewed research included 🔬🔭🌧️🌩️🌨️

LOOK WHAT WENT DOWN IN NEW MEXICO BEFORE THE FLOODS 🌊 😳😳😳 WATCH WHOLE VIDEO! POLITICIANS looking to understand what’s really contributing to extreme weather… WATCH THIS VIDEO 🛑🚨‼️ Peer reviewed research included 🔬🔭🌧️🌩️🌨️

GlamHamRadio

37,686 次观看 • 1 年前

NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya says one peer-reviewed paper doesn’t mean the science is settled. “There’s a sort of glamour to a peer-reviewed published paper, especially in a top journal.” “You read the paper, you want to believe it’s true… but that’s not enough.” “Scientists get enamored with our own ideas.” “One paper isn’t enough.” MAHA Institute Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD

NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya says one peer-reviewed paper doesn’t mean the science is settled. “There’s a sort of glamour to a peer-reviewed published paper, especially in a top journal.” “You read the paper, you want to believe it’s true… but that’s not enough.” “Scientists get enamored with our own ideas.” “One paper isn’t enough.” MAHA Institute Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD

Children’s Health Defense

53,239 次观看 • 2 个月前

The Illusion of Peer Review: A Fatal Flaw in Science Bret Weinstein highlights a critical flaw in how "peer-reviewed" science often misleads the public. A simple statistical error—like excluding inconvenient data points—can artificially inflate a treatment’s efficacy to 85% or higher, even if the intervention does nothing (e.g., "tap your nose three times"). Shockingly, this isn’t hypothetical. Multiple studies have used such methods to fabricate impressive results, yet peer review failed to catch them. If the system can’t spot these glaring distortions, what does it actually verify? The answer: Far less than we’re told. Weinstein compares modern peer review to the 2008 financial crisis, when rating agencies stamped junk mortgages as "AAA." The result? A facade of rigor masking systemic failure. Until science reforms its gatekeeping, "peer-reviewed" won’t mean trustworthy—just rubber-stamped.

The Illusion of Peer Review: A Fatal Flaw in Science Bret Weinstein highlights a critical flaw in how "peer-reviewed" science often misleads the public. A simple statistical error—like excluding inconvenient data points—can artificially inflate a treatment’s efficacy to 85% or higher, even if the intervention does nothing (e.g., "tap your nose three times"). Shockingly, this isn’t hypothetical. Multiple studies have used such methods to fabricate impressive results, yet peer review failed to catch them. If the system can’t spot these glaring distortions, what does it actually verify? The answer: Far less than we’re told. Weinstein compares modern peer review to the 2008 financial crisis, when rating agencies stamped junk mortgages as "AAA." The result? A facade of rigor masking systemic failure. Until science reforms its gatekeeping, "peer-reviewed" won’t mean trustworthy—just rubber-stamped.

Camus

74,764 次观看 • 1 年前

Watch and share our fun new ad! We must get Congress to understand how urgent it is to get the tax bill done!

Watch and share our fun new ad! We must get Congress to understand how urgent it is to get the tax bill done!

Stephen Moore

25,907 次观看 • 1 年前

BREAKING: Scientists just transferred "immune memory" between humans to kill a cancer that gives patients 3 weeks to live. This is tabelecleucel — and it just hit a 50% response rate where nothing else works. Here's what peer-reviewed science actually says 🧵

BREAKING: Scientists just transferred "immune memory" between humans to kill a cancer that gives patients 3 weeks to live. This is tabelecleucel — and it just hit a 50% response rate where nothing else works. Here's what peer-reviewed science actually says 🧵

Harshi Peiris, Ph.D.

86,245 次观看 • 5 个月前

This week, Joe Rogan spewed more anti-science misinformation... …claiming exercise and food are linked to mental health. Peer-reviewed research shows depression can be managed with pills! It is disruptive and dangerous for him to claim habits are connected to mental health!

This week, Joe Rogan spewed more anti-science misinformation... …claiming exercise and food are linked to mental health. Peer-reviewed research shows depression can be managed with pills! It is disruptive and dangerous for him to claim habits are connected to mental health!

Calley Means

1,851,068 次观看 • 3 年前

Candace Owens This is why Charlie Kirk assassinated. Must watch this to understand.

Candace Owens This is why Charlie Kirk assassinated. Must watch this to understand.

Iranian Observer

84,513 次观看 • 3 个月前

Here is a nice walkthrough on how to create a peer to peer listing on

Here is a nice walkthrough on how to create a peer to peer listing on

XRPresso.io

19,820 次观看 • 2 个月前

Take it from the only peer-reviewed scientist in the U.S. Senate: science plays a critical part in nearly every aspect of our lives. The Trump administration’s attacks on science are an attack on all of us.

Take it from the only peer-reviewed scientist in the U.S. Senate: science plays a critical part in nearly every aspect of our lives. The Trump administration’s attacks on science are an attack on all of us.

Senator John Hickenlooper

16,631 次观看 • 3 个月前

#InnovativeBioresearchVought $INNBCV launches on Solana on daos.fun. From the original creators of DeSci, our mission is to save Solana from pseudoscience; $INNBCV is done being persecuted for producing actual peer-reviewed studies published in the world's most important scientific journals such as Springer Nature. $INNBCV is done apologizing for producing real science. Homelander meme based, featuring legit peer-reviewed research studies, $INNBCV is the only one who can possibly save #DeSci. To join the general party sale click here (VIP status available on request)

#InnovativeBioresearchVought $INNBCV launches on Solana on daos.fun. From the original creators of DeSci, our mission is to save Solana from pseudoscience; $INNBCV is done being persecuted for producing actual peer-reviewed studies published in the world's most important scientific journals such as Springer Nature. $INNBCV is done apologizing for producing real science. Homelander meme based, featuring legit peer-reviewed research studies, $INNBCV is the only one who can possibly save #DeSci. To join the general party sale click here (VIP status available on request)

InnovativeBioresearch🇮🇹

60,734 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨How to PLAY this duo meta in 5 mins🚨 You will fully understand how to get to endgame stacked if you watch this, I promise

🚨How to PLAY this duo meta in 5 mins🚨 You will fully understand how to get to endgame stacked if you watch this, I promise

TSknows

116,563 次观看 • 9 个月前

Dr. Campbell and Professor Clancy Left Speechless Peer reviewed science buried for 800+ days Fake studies promoted Peer reviewed science suppressed No outrage No coverage from legacy and mainstream media Professor Robert Clancy criticizes an 800+ day delay of an "incredible" peer reviewed paper which would have dramatically changed the Pandemic trajectory. It's an OXFORD RCT showing chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine reduced PCR-confirmed symptomatic covid by at least 57%. GROK AI add further weight to Clancy.... "a meta-analysis of 12 RCTs confirms moderate prophylaxis benefit, supporting claims of underutilized early prevention amid vaccine prioritization." Results so good that Governments might have thought of mandating drugs when they forced messenger RNA

Dr. Campbell and Professor Clancy Left Speechless Peer reviewed science buried for 800+ days Fake studies promoted Peer reviewed science suppressed No outrage No coverage from legacy and mainstream media Professor Robert Clancy criticizes an 800+ day delay of an "incredible" peer reviewed paper which would have dramatically changed the Pandemic trajectory. It's an OXFORD RCT showing chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine reduced PCR-confirmed symptomatic covid by at least 57%. GROK AI add further weight to Clancy.... "a meta-analysis of 12 RCTs confirms moderate prophylaxis benefit, supporting claims of underutilized early prevention amid vaccine prioritization." Results so good that Governments might have thought of mandating drugs when they forced messenger RNA

Humanspective

117,355 次观看 • 6 个月前

"BREAKING NEWS - Twice-Censored Landmark COVID-19 Vaccine Autopsy Study Fully Peer-Reviewed and Published After enduring relentless censorship, our systematic review linking COVID-19 vaccines to death is now available for the entire world to read." Nicolas Hulscher full article below

"BREAKING NEWS - Twice-Censored Landmark COVID-19 Vaccine Autopsy Study Fully Peer-Reviewed and Published After enduring relentless censorship, our systematic review linking COVID-19 vaccines to death is now available for the entire world to read." Nicolas Hulscher full article below

DoctorRay

58,834 次观看 • 1 年前

Utterly crucial short vid to FULLY understand Climate Change. I kid you not - this outweighs any other 'science' This is the last word on the matter:

Utterly crucial short vid to FULLY understand Climate Change. I kid you not - this outweighs any other 'science' This is the last word on the matter:

Ivor Cummins

410,713 次观看 • 2 年前