Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨 📣 MUST-WATCH: Exclusive interview with MIT Professor Retsef Levi Retsef Levi, PhD, leading expert in risk analysis & Chair of the CDC COVID-19 Immunization Workgroup on ACIP. We discuss hard data on vaccine safety: myocarditis risks, pregnancy effects, booster necessity, cardiac signals, research challenges, personalized assessments, and the...

71,698 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🔥🎙️HOT OFF THE PRESS 📰 It was an enormous honor to interview rockstar researcher/ oncologist Dr. Wafik El-Deiry Wafik S. El-Deiry, MD, PhD, FACP, whose breakthroughs have transformed our understanding of cancer. His discovery of the p53 gene, known as the “guardian of the genome,” plays a crucial role in preventing cancer. This foundational work has shaped diagnostics, treatments, and targeted therapies. As Associate Dean at Brown University, Dir. of the Legorreta Cancer Center, and NCI Director nominee, Dr. El-Deiry holds an MD/PhD and has published over 300 papers. His bombshell research potentially linking the spike protein to cancer has sparked widespread debate—and for good reason. 🤯 💣 We discuss that and much more! Key Topics: 🚩The alarming rise of cancers in young adults 🚩Early warning signs of colon cancer & screening tips 🚩Is COVID a cancer-causing virus? 🚩The urgent need for transparent data on vaccine safety and long-term effects 🚩Potential links between mRNA vaccines and lymphomas/sarcomas 🚩The future of mRNA therapy for cancer 🚩Can anti-parasitics treat cancer? 🚩The harassment scientists face for publishing inconvenient data 🚩His vision for cancer research if he becomes the next NCI Director This is one of the most nuanced conversations on cancer, science, and transparency you’ll hear. Whether you're a patient, physician, or researcher, don’t miss it! Please share & drop a comment. We wanna know what’s on your mind. 🎧 Find “The Dana Parish Podcast” across all podcast platforms & YouTube! Huge thanks to my editor, Conrad deVroeg. 📺 PLEASE support my hard work by subscribing to my YT Channel and Substack, for more exclusive, uncensored conversations. Links in bio or below ⬇️ Thanks so much for watching! 🩷 🙏

Dana Parish

42,130 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🎙️ My latest podcast is 👀 😱 🚨 YOUR QUESTIONS ANSWERED🚨 I recently solicited questions from you for a top virologist/bioweapons expert and here we go… From being wrongfully accused of the 2001 anthrax attacks to newly-appointed Senior Medical Advisor at HHS and Director of Infectious Disease Response and Preparedness at ASPR, Dr. Steven Hatfill gave me one of the most jaw-dropping interviews I’ve done to date. A renowned virologist and bioweapons expert who also served as medical advisor during the first Trump administration, Dr. Hatfill joins me to reveal the debacle behind COVID, the vaccine, early treatments, and what really happened behind the scenes among federal officials during the early days of the pandemic. Hatfill was wrongfully accused of the anthrax attacks in the early 2000s and later exonerated, earning a multi-million dollar settlement from the US Government. But that didn’t stop him from stepping back into the fire. During the first Trump administration, he became a fierce and controversial champion for early COVID treatment while the mainstream medical establishment tried to silence him. In this episode, he lays out the evidence on how COVID was bioengineered—something most virologists will not go on the record about, how early treatments were suppressed, efficacy of nasal sprays & potential for intranasal vaccine, the “toxic” spike, the truth about the vaccines, and all this. 👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼 We cover: ✅ COVID and its bioweapon-like features ✅ Why early treatment protocols were buried and extensive research fraud ✅ How the spike protein behaves in the body, being found in tumors and reproductive tissues ✅ Potential links between the spike and increased cancer risk ✅ Nasal sprays to help prevent COVID and potential for intranasal vaccines ✅ H5N1 and the risk of it becoming a pandemic ✅ The silencing and punishment of doctors who went against the government narrative ✅ What should have been done, and what must happen now to prevent another disaster. This conversation pulls no punches. It's essential viewing for anyone who wants to understand what really happened, and what’s still at stake. 📍Please subscribe to my YT and support my work in bringing you this hard-won info. Link in bio. And share this episode with someone who needs to hear it! The Dana Parish Podcast also avail on: YouTube, Apple, Spotify ➡️ Leave your thoughts and questions in the comments—I read them all.

Dana Parish

98,283 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The COVID Cover-Up Crumbles—But the Assault on Children Continues 🚨 Pfizer wanted to hide its clinical trial data for 75 YEARS. Let that sink in. 75 years of buried adverse events, suppressed science, and undisclosed risks—all while governments & health agencies pushed their shots onto billions. Now, thanks to relentless pressure from journalists, lawsuits, and the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, the truth is finally emerging. And it’s damning. Dr. Brian Hooker warns: "The FDA, CDC, and NIH have been captured by Pharma. They fast-tracked vaccines with minimal safety testing, ignored red flags, and now they’re injecting BABIES with a shot that doesn’t even have full approval—just Emergency Use Authorization. This isn’t science. It’s an experiment." The Greatest Medical Scandal of Our Time - Pfizer’s own documents reveal thousands of adverse events, yet regulators looked the other way. - Healthy children face near-zero risk from COVID, but the CDC added the shot to the infant vaccine schedule anyway. - Myocarditis, neurological events, and immune dysfunction were downplayed—while dissenters were silenced. Who’s Protecting Our Kids? The same agencies that: ✔ Ridiculed natural immunity ✔ Censored doctors ✔ Pushed boosters with zero long-term safety data …are now pressuring parents to jab their babies for a virus that poses less risk than the flu. This isn’t public health. It’s profit-driven malpractice. The Fight Isn’t Over The walls are closing in on the COVID industrial complex. More whistleblowers are stepping forward. More data is leaking. More politicians are demanding answers. But until we have: ✅ Full transparency ✅ Criminal accountability ✅ An end to Pharma’s stranglehold on regulators …the war on medical freedom continues. Share this. Expose the truth. Hold them accountable.

Camus

13,178 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Massive Study Reveals More Bad News for the COVID Vaccinated The "conspiracy theorists" were right once again. There are HUGE health risks from the jab, no matter how much the media tries to downplay it. Take a look for yourself: Moderna (Dose 1/2): • Swelling of the brain and spinal cord: Almost 4 times (400%) increased risk (first dose) • Myocarditis: 3.48 times increased risk (first dose) • Pericarditis: 1.74 times increased risk (first dose) • Myocarditis (Second shot): 6.1 times increased risk AstraZeneca: • Blood clots: 3.23 times (320%) increased risk • Guillain–Barré syndrome (could lead to paralysis): 2.49 times increased risk • Pericarditis (Third dose): 6.91 times increased risk Pfizer: • Myocarditis (First dose): 2.78 times increased risk • Myocarditis (Second dose): 2.86 times increased risk • Myocarditis (Third dose): 2.09 times increased risk Moderna (Further doses beyond the first): • Myocarditis from the second shot: 6.1 times increased risk • Pericarditis (Fourth dose): 2.64 times increased risk • Myocarditis from the third dose: 2.01 times increased risk This study conducted by the Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) looked at a cohort of 99 million vaccinated individuals. The increased risks were compared to what was expected based on pre-COVID-19 vaccination healthcare data, or in simpler terms, if you did not receive the jab at all. Most of the above risk factors are calculated based on a single dose. When you consider many people took three shots or more, the results of the study become even more alarming. Listen to what Del Bigtree, host of The Highwire, had to say: “And they’re not even talking about cancer … but how about this? You’re like, well, only six times the amount of myocarditis. But if you add that six times to the two or three times for myocarditis. And what about the blood clots and stroke? What happens? “They’re not just six by themselves. They all stack up. What are we, like, 20 times the amount of risk for getting totally jacked up by this vaccine? And they’re only just starting the list. “And trust me, the scientists did everything they could to make this as conservative as they possibly could because no one wants to be responsible for, God forbid, say, we need to recall a vaccine.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

809,875 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨 🎙️ My podcast resumes with an interview that shook me to my core. Brianne Dressen, co-author of Worth A Shot, volunteered for the COVID vaccine trial. What followed? Life-altering injuries and a chilling truth: U.S. FDA, CDC, NIH, & NIAID quietly helped/ treated hundreds of the vaccine-injured in private while burying thousands (now, more) of cases from the public & MDs, who often dismissed vax-injured since they were told there were no major safety issues (beyond myocarditis) and thus, not made aware of NIH’s “secret” protocols that were helping these patients. The last 15 min of this podcast reveal never-before-seen Zoom calls between Brianne & FDA officials like Dr. Peter Marks, then head of FDA’s vaccine safety division. Exclusive recordings ONLY on Substack & YouTube—pls subscribe & share (links in bio)! Brianne, now a fierce advocate & co-founder of React19, exposes the fight for recognition & care. Neurologic injuries, not myocarditis, dominate vaccine injury reports. Yet, the public was kept in the dark. This is a massive, generally unknown, scandal.  Shocking revelations: •FDA heads asked the injured not to go public, promising statements to the public that never came. •Exclusive emails & calls with FDA’s Dr. Janet Woodcock & Dr. Peter Marks. •The stark contrast between officials’ private actions & public lies.   This isn’t “antivax” or fear mongering. It’s pro-truth, pro-compassion, pro-accountability. Brianne’s story—and countless others—demands transparency & rigorous research. React19 fights for the silenced. Will you amplify their voices? Subscribe on Substack/YouTube (Linktree in bio) for unfiltered convos where health, policy, & human stories collide.

Dana Parish

69,250 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

EXPLOSIVE MOMENT at CDC's ACIP Committee Reveals Shocking Pfizer Oversight In a stunning exchange, Dr. Robert Malone—a key inventor of the mRNA vaccine technology—publicly questioned Pfizer at the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). The focus: The biodistribution studies for the COVID-19 vaccine's Lipid Nanoparticles (LNPs). Dr. Malone, leveraging his foundational expertise, confronted Pfizer on two critical failures: 1️⃣ The "Least Sensitive" Method: Pfizer confirmed they used a whole-body imaging technique (luciferase-based). Dr. Malone, who pioneered this very assay, stated they deliberately chose the least sensitive method available. The gold standard—individual tissue dissection and analysis—would have provided a far more accurate picture of where the LNPs travel in the body. He asked point-blank why they opted for the weaker science. 2️⃣ "Edited" Data: Dr. Malone dropped a bombshell, alleging that the biodistribution data submitted to the FDA was edited compared to the data submitted to other regulatory agencies. He specifically stated, "The actual images were edited," and demanded an explanation. Pfizer's response? A complete non-answer. They deflected, stating only that they worked "in close consultation with the FDA." This moment crystallizes the very reason for the public's shattered trust in our public health institutions. A core question about the fundamental safety profile of a product injected into billions was met with a corporate shrug, hiding behind a captured regulator. The takeaway is undeniable: When the architect of the technology questions the integrity of the safety data, and the manufacturer has no substantive reply, it confirms the worst suspicions about the "safe and effective" narrative. This is precisely why a systemic overhaul of the FDA, CDC, and NIH is not just a political talking point—it is a medical necessity.

Camus

124,719 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Largest Vaccine Study Ever Reveals What the "Conspiracy Theorists" Said All Along Scientists found MASSIVE increased risks of developing several serious health conditions post-jab. But headlines suggest they're "small" and "rare." Take a look for yourself. Moderna (1st Dose): • Swelling of the brain and spinal cord: Almost 4 times (400%) increased risk • Myocarditis: 3.48 times increased risk • Pericarditis: 1.74 times increased risk • Myocarditis (Second shot): 6.1 times increased risk AstraZeneca: • Blood clots: 3.23 times (320%) increased risk • Guillain–Barré syndrome (could lead to paralysis): 2.49 times increased risk • Pericarditis (Third dose): 6.91 times increased risk Pfizer: • Myocarditis (First dose): 2.78 times increased risk • Myocarditis (Second dose): 2.86 times increased risk • Myocarditis (Third dose): 2.09 times increased risk Moderna (Further doses beyond the first): • Myocarditis from the second shot: 6.1 times increased risk • Pericarditis (Fourth dose): 2.64 times increased risk • Myocarditis from the third dose: 2.01 times increased risk This study conducted by the Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) looked at a cohort of 99 million vaccinated individuals. The increased risks were compared to what was expected based on pre-COVID-19 vaccination healthcare data, or in simpler terms, if you did not receive the jab at all. Most of the above risk factors are calculated based on a single dose. When you consider many people took three shots or more, the results of the study become even more alarming. Listen to what Del Bigtree had to say: "You're like, well, only six times the amount of myocarditis. But if you add that six times to the two or three times for myocarditis. And what about the blood clots and stroke? What happens? "They're not just six by themselves. They all stack up. What are we, like, 20 times the amount of risk for getting totally jacked up by this vaccine? And they're only just starting the list. "And trust me, the scientists did everything they could to make this as conservative as they possibly could because no one wants to be responsible for, God forbid, say, we need to recall a vaccine."

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

523,660 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

BREAKING: Del Bigtree and ICAN Announce Major Lawsuit Against the CDC to Expose Hidden Vaccine Safety Data Del Bigtree, founder of the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), just dropped a bombshell on The HighWire: a groundbreaking lawsuit targeting the CDC to unlock the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) data, a massive database tracking vaccine safety for millions of Americans. This isn’t just a legal fight; it’s a battle for truth, transparency, and the right of every citizen to know what’s in the vaccines they’re told are safe and effective. The VSD, established in 1990, compiles electronic health records from 11 major healthcare organizations nationwide. With over 359 studies in PubMed (as of Sept 2024) relying on its data, it’s a cornerstone of vaccine safety monitoring. But here’s the catch: years ago, after independent scientists used VSD data to publish studies raising concerns about vaccine risks, the CDC quietly moved the VSD outside government control, seemingly to dodge Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. Since then, access has been tightly restricted, leaving the public and most scientists in the dark. Bigtree is calling this moveව Black and white photo of a person standing in front of a brick wallBigtree is calling this move a deliberate attempt to hide critical data from the American people. He declared that they want the VSD not just available, they want it public. Any scientist, anywhere, should be able to say, I want to check your work. Show me the Pfizer data. Show me the COVID vaccine injury reports. Prove it’s safe. The stakes are high: without access, how can we trust claims about vaccine safety? How can we understand the injuries reported in hearings like Sen. Ron Johnson’s recent sessions? This lawsuit is personal for Bigtree, who played a key role in securing Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s nomination as HHS Secretary. Now, he’s stepping back to focus on this fight, even if it means challenging allies in government. He said he’s hitting this from all sides, vowing to make the VSD accessible forever, not just for the next two years, but for all time. Why does this matter? Because the VSD holds answers. Answers about vaccine injuries. Answers about how safety is determined. Answers the public deserves. Right now, Bigtree says, it’s being hidden from us. That’s why so many are being injured. This legal battle could be long, but it’s historic. It’s a test of what happens when citizens demand accountability from their own government, even when friends are in high places. Bigtree invites you to join the experiment: follow this lawsuit, share this post, and demand vaccine transparency.

Camus

35,630 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr