正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

🚨 📣 MUST-WATCH: Exclusive interview with MIT Professor Retsef Levi Retsef Levi, PhD, leading expert in risk analysis & Chair of the CDC COVID-19 Immunization Workgroup on ACIP. We discuss hard data on vaccine safety: myocarditis risks, pregnancy effects, booster necessity, cardiac signals, research challenges, personalized assessments, and the... show more

Dana Parish

43,144 subscribers

71,698 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

健康养生科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

💣📣 NEW: 20 Million Dead, $25 Trillion in Damages: Professor Richard H. Ebright Warned of a Lab-Created Pandemic For Decades. Why did no one listen? Molecular Biologist, Richard Ebright, is a leading authority on Gain of Function (GoF) research, which involves manipulating pathogens in the lab to become more contagious or dangerous. In this new episode of my podcast, we delve into the alarming historical timeline and evolution of GoF— the catastrophe of much scientific research pivoting to biodefense—the players, the press, & the cover-ups that provide context for understanding how reckless science likely led to the Covid pandemic. 🔥 A Must-Listen 🔥 I consider this the most decisive account of events that led us here, and includes the critical steps we must take in order to stop the next outbreak. Here is the full interview, followed by a 🧵 of clips. The Dana Parish Podcast can also be found in my newsletter, YT channel, Spotify, & Apple. 🔗 Links in “linktree” in bio. 🔗 Please support my (hard!) work in sharing exclusive, unadulterated content by subscribing ;) 🙏

💣📣 NEW: 20 Million Dead, $25 Trillion in Damages: Professor Richard H. Ebright Warned of a Lab-Created Pandemic For Decades. Why did no one listen? Molecular Biologist, Richard Ebright, is a leading authority on Gain of Function (GoF) research, which involves manipulating pathogens in the lab to become more contagious or dangerous. In this new episode of my podcast, we delve into the alarming historical timeline and evolution of GoF— the catastrophe of much scientific research pivoting to biodefense—the players, the press, & the cover-ups that provide context for understanding how reckless science likely led to the Covid pandemic. 🔥 A Must-Listen 🔥 I consider this the most decisive account of events that led us here, and includes the critical steps we must take in order to stop the next outbreak. Here is the full interview, followed by a 🧵 of clips. The Dana Parish Podcast can also be found in my newsletter, YT channel, Spotify, & Apple. 🔗 Links in “linktree” in bio. 🔗 Please support my (hard!) work in sharing exclusive, unadulterated content by subscribing ;) 🙏

Dana Parish

91,033 次观看 • 1 年前

🔥🎙️HOT OFF THE PRESS 📰 It was an enormous honor to interview rockstar researcher/ oncologist Dr. Wafik El-Deiry Wafik S. El-Deiry, MD, PhD, FACP, whose breakthroughs have transformed our understanding of cancer. His discovery of the p53 gene, known as the “guardian of the genome,” plays a crucial role in preventing cancer. This foundational work has shaped diagnostics, treatments, and targeted therapies. As Associate Dean at Brown University, Dir. of the Legorreta Cancer Center, and NCI Director nominee, Dr. El-Deiry holds an MD/PhD and has published over 300 papers. His bombshell research potentially linking the spike protein to cancer has sparked widespread debate—and for good reason. 🤯 💣 We discuss that and much more! Key Topics: 🚩The alarming rise of cancers in young adults 🚩Early warning signs of colon cancer & screening tips 🚩Is COVID a cancer-causing virus? 🚩The urgent need for transparent data on vaccine safety and long-term effects 🚩Potential links between mRNA vaccines and lymphomas/sarcomas 🚩The future of mRNA therapy for cancer 🚩Can anti-parasitics treat cancer? 🚩The harassment scientists face for publishing inconvenient data 🚩His vision for cancer research if he becomes the next NCI Director This is one of the most nuanced conversations on cancer, science, and transparency you’ll hear. Whether you're a patient, physician, or researcher, don’t miss it! Please share & drop a comment. We wanna know what’s on your mind. 🎧 Find “The Dana Parish Podcast” across all podcast platforms & YouTube! Huge thanks to my editor, Conrad deVroeg. 📺 PLEASE support my hard work by subscribing to my YT Channel and Substack, for more exclusive, uncensored conversations. Links in bio or below ⬇️ Thanks so much for watching! 🩷 🙏

🔥🎙️HOT OFF THE PRESS 📰 It was an enormous honor to interview rockstar researcher/ oncologist Dr. Wafik El-Deiry Wafik S. El-Deiry, MD, PhD, FACP, whose breakthroughs have transformed our understanding of cancer. His discovery of the p53 gene, known as the “guardian of the genome,” plays a crucial role in preventing cancer. This foundational work has shaped diagnostics, treatments, and targeted therapies. As Associate Dean at Brown University, Dir. of the Legorreta Cancer Center, and NCI Director nominee, Dr. El-Deiry holds an MD/PhD and has published over 300 papers. His bombshell research potentially linking the spike protein to cancer has sparked widespread debate—and for good reason. 🤯 💣 We discuss that and much more! Key Topics: 🚩The alarming rise of cancers in young adults 🚩Early warning signs of colon cancer & screening tips 🚩Is COVID a cancer-causing virus? 🚩The urgent need for transparent data on vaccine safety and long-term effects 🚩Potential links between mRNA vaccines and lymphomas/sarcomas 🚩The future of mRNA therapy for cancer 🚩Can anti-parasitics treat cancer? 🚩The harassment scientists face for publishing inconvenient data 🚩His vision for cancer research if he becomes the next NCI Director This is one of the most nuanced conversations on cancer, science, and transparency you’ll hear. Whether you're a patient, physician, or researcher, don’t miss it! Please share & drop a comment. We wanna know what’s on your mind. 🎧 Find “The Dana Parish Podcast” across all podcast platforms & YouTube! Huge thanks to my editor, Conrad deVroeg. 📺 PLEASE support my hard work by subscribing to my YT Channel and Substack, for more exclusive, uncensored conversations. Links in bio or below ⬇️ Thanks so much for watching! 🩷 🙏

Dana Parish

49,896 次观看 • 1 年前

My personal reflections on the COVID part of last ACIP meeting: The ACIP voted recommendations for the COVID vaccines capture the principles of personalized, modern, and ethical medicine, that is based on nuanced individual risk-benefit assessment. It is evident that most of the public and vast majority of healthcare workers (90%) do not buy into the narrative of 'safe and effective' COVID vaccines that should be taken by everyone each year! They showed it by their actions, not following the CDC past recommendations! The discussions during the ACIP meetings were robust, comprehensive, and rigorous. It was the first time ACIP has discussed critical risks and uncertainties like immune response to repeated boosting, bio-distribution, pharmacokinetics, and potential impurities, as well as the lack of reliable data to assess the benefits of repeated boosting. Most importantly, this was the first time vaccine injuries and vaccine injured were acknowledged as a problem that must be addressed! The ACIP members heard from some of the COVID Immunization workgroup members, who are top notch scholars in their respective areas. It was also the first time, where ACIP had meaningful scientific debates including hearing from the minority opinion in the workgroup. This is how science is supposed to work, and how trust is built.

My personal reflections on the COVID part of last ACIP meeting: The ACIP voted recommendations for the COVID vaccines capture the principles of personalized, modern, and ethical medicine, that is based on nuanced individual risk-benefit assessment. It is evident that most of the public and vast majority of healthcare workers (90%) do not buy into the narrative of 'safe and effective' COVID vaccines that should be taken by everyone each year! They showed it by their actions, not following the CDC past recommendations! The discussions during the ACIP meetings were robust, comprehensive, and rigorous. It was the first time ACIP has discussed critical risks and uncertainties like immune response to repeated boosting, bio-distribution, pharmacokinetics, and potential impurities, as well as the lack of reliable data to assess the benefits of repeated boosting. Most importantly, this was the first time vaccine injuries and vaccine injured were acknowledged as a problem that must be addressed! The ACIP members heard from some of the COVID Immunization workgroup members, who are top notch scholars in their respective areas. It was also the first time, where ACIP had meaningful scientific debates including hearing from the minority opinion in the workgroup. This is how science is supposed to work, and how trust is built.

Retsef Levi

179,196 次观看 • 11 个月前

🔥📣 I am thrilled to bring you this fascinating, shocking interview with former CDC Director, Dr. Robert Redfield. 👀 I almost fell off my seat a number of times. 👀 We cover a lot of ground in these 90 minutes, in which he shatters the establishment narratives on everything from Covid origins, Covid vaccines, mandates, early treatment, & LongCovid, to the sweeping government censorship that led to the public being deceived on a massive scale. He is also, to my knowledge, the first CDC Director to go on the record about chronic Lyme, an enormously fraught medical/ political scandal with overlap to Covid. Some of the questions asked were sent to me by you. I was surprised by the number of scientists who reached out wanting clarity or validation, mostly around Covid vaccines and long Covid. I did my best to get it all in. Am eager for your thoughts and reactions. Here is the full interview, followed by a 🧵 of clips. The interview can also be found in my newsletter and YT channel (see linktree in bio)! Please support my work in sharing unadulterated, exclusive content like this by subscribing to my newsletter & YT channel!

🔥📣 I am thrilled to bring you this fascinating, shocking interview with former CDC Director, Dr. Robert Redfield. 👀 I almost fell off my seat a number of times. 👀 We cover a lot of ground in these 90 minutes, in which he shatters the establishment narratives on everything from Covid origins, Covid vaccines, mandates, early treatment, & LongCovid, to the sweeping government censorship that led to the public being deceived on a massive scale. He is also, to my knowledge, the first CDC Director to go on the record about chronic Lyme, an enormously fraught medical/ political scandal with overlap to Covid. Some of the questions asked were sent to me by you. I was surprised by the number of scientists who reached out wanting clarity or validation, mostly around Covid vaccines and long Covid. I did my best to get it all in. Am eager for your thoughts and reactions. Here is the full interview, followed by a 🧵 of clips. The interview can also be found in my newsletter and YT channel (see linktree in bio)! Please support my work in sharing unadulterated, exclusive content like this by subscribing to my newsletter & YT channel!

Dana Parish

943,460 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨PREMIERE: Inside the Vaccine Trials – Lived Experiences This powerful documentary film reveals the untold stories of COVID-19 vaccine trial participants from around the globe. These brave volunteers signed up with hope and trust in the science—only to experience devastating, life-altering health complications. Now trapped in medical limbo, their voices have been dismissed, their suffering ignored, and their stories censored. Regulatory agencies initially declared the COVID-19 vaccines “very safe” based on trial data. But a growing number of independent scientists have since re-examined that same data—raising serious concerns about adverse events that were overlooked or downplayed by regulators. Through gripping personal accounts and expert analysis, this film investigates those concerns and demands a long-overdue conversation about vaccine safety, regulatory transparency, and the real human cost of being silenced. Be the first to watch the full film right here! Share their stories, and help this film go viral. 📚 Full list of scientific sources cited in the film, with timestamps:

🚨PREMIERE: Inside the Vaccine Trials – Lived Experiences This powerful documentary film reveals the untold stories of COVID-19 vaccine trial participants from around the globe. These brave volunteers signed up with hope and trust in the science—only to experience devastating, life-altering health complications. Now trapped in medical limbo, their voices have been dismissed, their suffering ignored, and their stories censored. Regulatory agencies initially declared the COVID-19 vaccines “very safe” based on trial data. But a growing number of independent scientists have since re-examined that same data—raising serious concerns about adverse events that were overlooked or downplayed by regulators. Through gripping personal accounts and expert analysis, this film investigates those concerns and demands a long-overdue conversation about vaccine safety, regulatory transparency, and the real human cost of being silenced. Be the first to watch the full film right here! Share their stories, and help this film go viral. 📚 Full list of scientific sources cited in the film, with timestamps:

McCullough Foundation

69,510 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 🚨 NOVAVAX DERAILED!! 📣 New podcast episode live! I flew to Raleigh to get the scoop on Novavax (the protein-based Covid vaccine) from Himanshu Shah of Shah Capital, one of its largest shareholders. I wanted to understand exactly how & why it was sidelined in spite of early rallying and favorable safety profile. As part of the full NVAX story, Shah’s is an important insider view, though more financially-focused than my usual medical/scientific discussions. There is certainly much more to the story, which I will cover in upcoming episodes on another date. Please drop any comments or questions and I’ll pass them on for you. ‼️CHAPTERS IN NEXT TWEET ‼️ 🎧 Subscribe to The Dana Parish Podcast for more in-depth conversations at the intersection of public health, policy, and real-world decision making!

Dana Parish

61,349 次观看 • 4 个月前

🎙️ My latest podcast is 👀 😱 🚨 YOUR QUESTIONS ANSWERED🚨 I recently solicited questions from you for a top virologist/bioweapons expert and here we go… From being wrongfully accused of the 2001 anthrax attacks to newly-appointed Senior Medical Advisor at HHS and Director of Infectious Disease Response and Preparedness at ASPR, Dr. Steven Hatfill gave me one of the most jaw-dropping interviews I’ve done to date. A renowned virologist and bioweapons expert who also served as medical advisor during the first Trump administration, Dr. Hatfill joins me to reveal the debacle behind COVID, the vaccine, early treatments, and what really happened behind the scenes among federal officials during the early days of the pandemic. Hatfill was wrongfully accused of the anthrax attacks in the early 2000s and later exonerated, earning a multi-million dollar settlement from the US Government. But that didn’t stop him from stepping back into the fire. During the first Trump administration, he became a fierce and controversial champion for early COVID treatment while the mainstream medical establishment tried to silence him. In this episode, he lays out the evidence on how COVID was bioengineered—something most virologists will not go on the record about, how early treatments were suppressed, efficacy of nasal sprays & potential for intranasal vaccine, the “toxic” spike, the truth about the vaccines, and all this. 👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼 We cover: ✅ COVID and its bioweapon-like features ✅ Why early treatment protocols were buried and extensive research fraud ✅ How the spike protein behaves in the body, being found in tumors and reproductive tissues ✅ Potential links between the spike and increased cancer risk ✅ Nasal sprays to help prevent COVID and potential for intranasal vaccines ✅ H5N1 and the risk of it becoming a pandemic ✅ The silencing and punishment of doctors who went against the government narrative ✅ What should have been done, and what must happen now to prevent another disaster. This conversation pulls no punches. It's essential viewing for anyone who wants to understand what really happened, and what’s still at stake. 📍Please subscribe to my YT and support my work in bringing you this hard-won info. Link in bio. And share this episode with someone who needs to hear it! The Dana Parish Podcast also avail on: YouTube, Apple, Spotify ➡️ Leave your thoughts and questions in the comments—I read them all.

🎙️ My latest podcast is 👀 😱 🚨 YOUR QUESTIONS ANSWERED🚨 I recently solicited questions from you for a top virologist/bioweapons expert and here we go… From being wrongfully accused of the 2001 anthrax attacks to newly-appointed Senior Medical Advisor at HHS and Director of Infectious Disease Response and Preparedness at ASPR, Dr. Steven Hatfill gave me one of the most jaw-dropping interviews I’ve done to date. A renowned virologist and bioweapons expert who also served as medical advisor during the first Trump administration, Dr. Hatfill joins me to reveal the debacle behind COVID, the vaccine, early treatments, and what really happened behind the scenes among federal officials during the early days of the pandemic. Hatfill was wrongfully accused of the anthrax attacks in the early 2000s and later exonerated, earning a multi-million dollar settlement from the US Government. But that didn’t stop him from stepping back into the fire. During the first Trump administration, he became a fierce and controversial champion for early COVID treatment while the mainstream medical establishment tried to silence him. In this episode, he lays out the evidence on how COVID was bioengineered—something most virologists will not go on the record about, how early treatments were suppressed, efficacy of nasal sprays & potential for intranasal vaccine, the “toxic” spike, the truth about the vaccines, and all this. 👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼 We cover: ✅ COVID and its bioweapon-like features ✅ Why early treatment protocols were buried and extensive research fraud ✅ How the spike protein behaves in the body, being found in tumors and reproductive tissues ✅ Potential links between the spike and increased cancer risk ✅ Nasal sprays to help prevent COVID and potential for intranasal vaccines ✅ H5N1 and the risk of it becoming a pandemic ✅ The silencing and punishment of doctors who went against the government narrative ✅ What should have been done, and what must happen now to prevent another disaster. This conversation pulls no punches. It's essential viewing for anyone who wants to understand what really happened, and what’s still at stake. 📍Please subscribe to my YT and support my work in bringing you this hard-won info. Link in bio. And share this episode with someone who needs to hear it! The Dana Parish Podcast also avail on: YouTube, Apple, Spotify ➡️ Leave your thoughts and questions in the comments—I read them all.

Dana Parish

98,283 次观看 • 1 年前

For the past 20 years, RFK Jr. has prayed to God to be put in a position to end the chronic disease epidemic. With the grace of God, that dream has become a reality. And he’s already made huge moves: • He nuked $500 million in mRNA vaccine funding, essentially derailing its use because who wants to fund it privately. • He raised concerns about Tylenol and autism, which in turn compelled Trump to go off on childhood vaccines. • He got rid of all 17 members on the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and replaced them with figures like Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Martin Kulldorff, and Prof. Retsef Levi. • HHS no longer recommends the COVID-19 shot for healthy children and pregnant women. #ad: But Kennedy has so much more work to do. And a new film is exposing decades of lies about public health. If you’ve wondered why Americans are sicker than ever — and why no one stopped it — this film lays it all out. I’ve already watched it, and it tells the corruption story masterfully. You can watch it now at the link below. It’s free for a limited time.

For the past 20 years, RFK Jr. has prayed to God to be put in a position to end the chronic disease epidemic. With the grace of God, that dream has become a reality. And he’s already made huge moves: • He nuked $500 million in mRNA vaccine funding, essentially derailing its use because who wants to fund it privately. • He raised concerns about Tylenol and autism, which in turn compelled Trump to go off on childhood vaccines. • He got rid of all 17 members on the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and replaced them with figures like Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Martin Kulldorff, and Prof. Retsef Levi. • HHS no longer recommends the COVID-19 shot for healthy children and pregnant women. #ad: But Kennedy has so much more work to do. And a new film is exposing decades of lies about public health. If you’ve wondered why Americans are sicker than ever — and why no one stopped it — this film lays it all out. I’ve already watched it, and it tells the corruption story masterfully. You can watch it now at the link below. It’s free for a limited time.

Vigilant Fox 🦊

102,499 次观看 • 11 个月前

Massive Study Reveals More Bad News for the COVID Vaccinated The "conspiracy theorists" were right once again. There are HUGE health risks from the jab, no matter how much the media tries to downplay it. Take a look for yourself: Moderna (Dose 1/2): • Swelling of the brain and spinal cord: Almost 4 times (400%) increased risk (first dose) • Myocarditis: 3.48 times increased risk (first dose) • Pericarditis: 1.74 times increased risk (first dose) • Myocarditis (Second shot): 6.1 times increased risk AstraZeneca: • Blood clots: 3.23 times (320%) increased risk • Guillain–Barré syndrome (could lead to paralysis): 2.49 times increased risk • Pericarditis (Third dose): 6.91 times increased risk Pfizer: • Myocarditis (First dose): 2.78 times increased risk • Myocarditis (Second dose): 2.86 times increased risk • Myocarditis (Third dose): 2.09 times increased risk Moderna (Further doses beyond the first): • Myocarditis from the second shot: 6.1 times increased risk • Pericarditis (Fourth dose): 2.64 times increased risk • Myocarditis from the third dose: 2.01 times increased risk This study conducted by the Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) looked at a cohort of 99 million vaccinated individuals. The increased risks were compared to what was expected based on pre-COVID-19 vaccination healthcare data, or in simpler terms, if you did not receive the jab at all. Most of the above risk factors are calculated based on a single dose. When you consider many people took three shots or more, the results of the study become even more alarming. Listen to what Del Bigtree, host of The Highwire, had to say: “And they’re not even talking about cancer … but how about this? You’re like, well, only six times the amount of myocarditis. But if you add that six times to the two or three times for myocarditis. And what about the blood clots and stroke? What happens? “They’re not just six by themselves. They all stack up. What are we, like, 20 times the amount of risk for getting totally jacked up by this vaccine? And they’re only just starting the list. “And trust me, the scientists did everything they could to make this as conservative as they possibly could because no one wants to be responsible for, God forbid, say, we need to recall a vaccine.”

Massive Study Reveals More Bad News for the COVID Vaccinated The "conspiracy theorists" were right once again. There are HUGE health risks from the jab, no matter how much the media tries to downplay it. Take a look for yourself: Moderna (Dose 1/2): • Swelling of the brain and spinal cord: Almost 4 times (400%) increased risk (first dose) • Myocarditis: 3.48 times increased risk (first dose) • Pericarditis: 1.74 times increased risk (first dose) • Myocarditis (Second shot): 6.1 times increased risk AstraZeneca: • Blood clots: 3.23 times (320%) increased risk • Guillain–Barré syndrome (could lead to paralysis): 2.49 times increased risk • Pericarditis (Third dose): 6.91 times increased risk Pfizer: • Myocarditis (First dose): 2.78 times increased risk • Myocarditis (Second dose): 2.86 times increased risk • Myocarditis (Third dose): 2.09 times increased risk Moderna (Further doses beyond the first): • Myocarditis from the second shot: 6.1 times increased risk • Pericarditis (Fourth dose): 2.64 times increased risk • Myocarditis from the third dose: 2.01 times increased risk This study conducted by the Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) looked at a cohort of 99 million vaccinated individuals. The increased risks were compared to what was expected based on pre-COVID-19 vaccination healthcare data, or in simpler terms, if you did not receive the jab at all. Most of the above risk factors are calculated based on a single dose. When you consider many people took three shots or more, the results of the study become even more alarming. Listen to what Del Bigtree, host of The Highwire, had to say: “And they’re not even talking about cancer … but how about this? You’re like, well, only six times the amount of myocarditis. But if you add that six times to the two or three times for myocarditis. And what about the blood clots and stroke? What happens? “They’re not just six by themselves. They all stack up. What are we, like, 20 times the amount of risk for getting totally jacked up by this vaccine? And they’re only just starting the list. “And trust me, the scientists did everything they could to make this as conservative as they possibly could because no one wants to be responsible for, God forbid, say, we need to recall a vaccine.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

809,984 次观看 • 2 年前

🚨 🎙️ My podcast resumes with an interview that shook me to my core. Brianne Dressen, co-author of Worth A Shot, volunteered for the COVID vaccine trial. What followed? Life-altering injuries and a chilling truth: U.S. FDA, CDC, NIH, & NIAID quietly helped/ treated hundreds of the vaccine-injured in private while burying thousands (now, more) of cases from the public & MDs, who often dismissed vax-injured since they were told there were no major safety issues (beyond myocarditis) and thus, not made aware of NIH’s “secret” protocols that were helping these patients. The last 15 min of this podcast reveal never-before-seen Zoom calls between Brianne & FDA officials like Dr. Peter Marks, then head of FDA’s vaccine safety division. Exclusive recordings ONLY on Substack & YouTube—pls subscribe & share (links in bio)! Brianne, now a fierce advocate & co-founder of React19, exposes the fight for recognition & care. Neurologic injuries, not myocarditis, dominate vaccine injury reports. Yet, the public was kept in the dark. This is a massive, generally unknown, scandal. Shocking revelations: •FDA heads asked the injured not to go public, promising statements to the public that never came. •Exclusive emails & calls with FDA’s Dr. Janet Woodcock & Dr. Peter Marks. •The stark contrast between officials’ private actions & public lies. This isn’t “antivax” or fear mongering. It’s pro-truth, pro-compassion, pro-accountability. Brianne’s story—and countless others—demands transparency & rigorous research. React19 fights for the silenced. Will you amplify their voices? Subscribe on Substack/YouTube (Linktree in bio) for unfiltered convos where health, policy, & human stories collide.

🚨 🎙️ My podcast resumes with an interview that shook me to my core. Brianne Dressen, co-author of Worth A Shot, volunteered for the COVID vaccine trial. What followed? Life-altering injuries and a chilling truth: U.S. FDA, CDC, NIH, & NIAID quietly helped/ treated hundreds of the vaccine-injured in private while burying thousands (now, more) of cases from the public & MDs, who often dismissed vax-injured since they were told there were no major safety issues (beyond myocarditis) and thus, not made aware of NIH’s “secret” protocols that were helping these patients. The last 15 min of this podcast reveal never-before-seen Zoom calls between Brianne & FDA officials like Dr. Peter Marks, then head of FDA’s vaccine safety division. Exclusive recordings ONLY on Substack & YouTube—pls subscribe & share (links in bio)! Brianne, now a fierce advocate & co-founder of React19, exposes the fight for recognition & care. Neurologic injuries, not myocarditis, dominate vaccine injury reports. Yet, the public was kept in the dark. This is a massive, generally unknown, scandal. Shocking revelations: •FDA heads asked the injured not to go public, promising statements to the public that never came. •Exclusive emails & calls with FDA’s Dr. Janet Woodcock & Dr. Peter Marks. •The stark contrast between officials’ private actions & public lies. This isn’t “antivax” or fear mongering. It’s pro-truth, pro-compassion, pro-accountability. Brianne’s story—and countless others—demands transparency & rigorous research. React19 fights for the silenced. Will you amplify their voices? Subscribe on Substack/YouTube (Linktree in bio) for unfiltered convos where health, policy, & human stories collide.

Dana Parish

69,250 次观看 • 1 年前

Largest Vaccine Study Ever Reveals What the "Conspiracy Theorists" Said All Along Scientists found MASSIVE increased risks of developing several serious health conditions post-jab. But headlines suggest they're "small" and "rare." Take a look for yourself. Moderna (1st Dose): • Swelling of the brain and spinal cord: Almost 4 times (400%) increased risk • Myocarditis: 3.48 times increased risk • Pericarditis: 1.74 times increased risk • Myocarditis (Second shot): 6.1 times increased risk AstraZeneca: • Blood clots: 3.23 times (320%) increased risk • Guillain–Barré syndrome (could lead to paralysis): 2.49 times increased risk • Pericarditis (Third dose): 6.91 times increased risk Pfizer: • Myocarditis (First dose): 2.78 times increased risk • Myocarditis (Second dose): 2.86 times increased risk • Myocarditis (Third dose): 2.09 times increased risk Moderna (Further doses beyond the first): • Myocarditis from the second shot: 6.1 times increased risk • Pericarditis (Fourth dose): 2.64 times increased risk • Myocarditis from the third dose: 2.01 times increased risk This study conducted by the Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) looked at a cohort of 99 million vaccinated individuals. The increased risks were compared to what was expected based on pre-COVID-19 vaccination healthcare data, or in simpler terms, if you did not receive the jab at all. Most of the above risk factors are calculated based on a single dose. When you consider many people took three shots or more, the results of the study become even more alarming. Listen to what Del Bigtree had to say: "You're like, well, only six times the amount of myocarditis. But if you add that six times to the two or three times for myocarditis. And what about the blood clots and stroke? What happens? "They're not just six by themselves. They all stack up. What are we, like, 20 times the amount of risk for getting totally jacked up by this vaccine? And they're only just starting the list. "And trust me, the scientists did everything they could to make this as conservative as they possibly could because no one wants to be responsible for, God forbid, say, we need to recall a vaccine."

Largest Vaccine Study Ever Reveals What the "Conspiracy Theorists" Said All Along Scientists found MASSIVE increased risks of developing several serious health conditions post-jab. But headlines suggest they're "small" and "rare." Take a look for yourself. Moderna (1st Dose): • Swelling of the brain and spinal cord: Almost 4 times (400%) increased risk • Myocarditis: 3.48 times increased risk • Pericarditis: 1.74 times increased risk • Myocarditis (Second shot): 6.1 times increased risk AstraZeneca: • Blood clots: 3.23 times (320%) increased risk • Guillain–Barré syndrome (could lead to paralysis): 2.49 times increased risk • Pericarditis (Third dose): 6.91 times increased risk Pfizer: • Myocarditis (First dose): 2.78 times increased risk • Myocarditis (Second dose): 2.86 times increased risk • Myocarditis (Third dose): 2.09 times increased risk Moderna (Further doses beyond the first): • Myocarditis from the second shot: 6.1 times increased risk • Pericarditis (Fourth dose): 2.64 times increased risk • Myocarditis from the third dose: 2.01 times increased risk This study conducted by the Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) looked at a cohort of 99 million vaccinated individuals. The increased risks were compared to what was expected based on pre-COVID-19 vaccination healthcare data, or in simpler terms, if you did not receive the jab at all. Most of the above risk factors are calculated based on a single dose. When you consider many people took three shots or more, the results of the study become even more alarming. Listen to what Del Bigtree had to say: "You're like, well, only six times the amount of myocarditis. But if you add that six times to the two or three times for myocarditis. And what about the blood clots and stroke? What happens? "They're not just six by themselves. They all stack up. What are we, like, 20 times the amount of risk for getting totally jacked up by this vaccine? And they're only just starting the list. "And trust me, the scientists did everything they could to make this as conservative as they possibly could because no one wants to be responsible for, God forbid, say, we need to recall a vaccine."

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

523,933 次观看 • 2 年前

EXPLOSIVE MOMENT at CDC's ACIP Committee Reveals Shocking Pfizer Oversight In a stunning exchange, Dr. Robert Malone—a key inventor of the mRNA vaccine technology—publicly questioned Pfizer at the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). The focus: The biodistribution studies for the COVID-19 vaccine's Lipid Nanoparticles (LNPs). Dr. Malone, leveraging his foundational expertise, confronted Pfizer on two critical failures: 1️⃣ The "Least Sensitive" Method: Pfizer confirmed they used a whole-body imaging technique (luciferase-based). Dr. Malone, who pioneered this very assay, stated they deliberately chose the least sensitive method available. The gold standard—individual tissue dissection and analysis—would have provided a far more accurate picture of where the LNPs travel in the body. He asked point-blank why they opted for the weaker science. 2️⃣ "Edited" Data: Dr. Malone dropped a bombshell, alleging that the biodistribution data submitted to the FDA was edited compared to the data submitted to other regulatory agencies. He specifically stated, "The actual images were edited," and demanded an explanation. Pfizer's response? A complete non-answer. They deflected, stating only that they worked "in close consultation with the FDA." This moment crystallizes the very reason for the public's shattered trust in our public health institutions. A core question about the fundamental safety profile of a product injected into billions was met with a corporate shrug, hiding behind a captured regulator. The takeaway is undeniable: When the architect of the technology questions the integrity of the safety data, and the manufacturer has no substantive reply, it confirms the worst suspicions about the "safe and effective" narrative. This is precisely why a systemic overhaul of the FDA, CDC, and NIH is not just a political talking point—it is a medical necessity.

Camus

124,719 次观看 • 11 个月前

🚨 🎙️ NEW PODCAST 🚨🚨 BRAIN WARS: Prof. James Giordano on Neuroweapons, Neurotechnology, & Global Security Prof. James Giordano is a rockstar in neuroscience, neurotechnology, and biosecurity. For years, I’ve been following his work—including his notorious military talks 😱 (iykyk)—and was determined to land this interview. As Professor Emeritus in the Departments of Neurology and Biochemistry at Georgetown University and Director of the Center for Disruptive Technology and Future Warfare of the Institute for National Strategic Studies at the National Defense University, he’s a leading expert on unraveling mysteries like Havana Syndrome—the bizarre illness that targeted & disabled U.S. diplomats and intelligence officers, and now, civilians. But this conversation goes far beyond that, delving into wild stuff that’s sounds like sci-fi but is actually happening. Now. Think directed energy weapons zapping brains, nanotechnology that can be injected or inhaled to “access the brain remotely,” 😬 microbes that alter thoughts and behavior 🦠 , and the human brain 🧠 as the new frontier in global conflicts. This isn’t your typical science talk. 😆 We dive into deeply hidden & unsettling—but important— territory: 🔹 Can nanotechnology be used to access the brain without surgery? 🔹 The truth behind Havana Syndrome and who may be using directed energy weapons to attack public officials and civilians. 🔹 How ultrasonic and microwave weapons can silently incapacitate targets. 🔹 Are claims of covert chip implants, drone invasions, and directed energy weapons real? [hint: yes] 🔹 Can nanoparticles cause untraceable deaths? 🔹 Can microbes be engineered to change human thoughts and behavior? 🔹 What are the dual-use dangers of precision medicine, synthetic biology, and gene editing? Dr. Giordano brings clarity, insight, & 4+ decades of scientific and biodefense knowledge. His message is urgent: the same biomedical tools that promise healing can also be used for harm. This conversation made my head explode (while, once again, trying to look composed!) —and he’s agreed to come back for a part two. If this episode sparks questions, leave them in the comments. We’ll bring them to Prof. Giordano next time. 🎧 The Dana Parish Podcast is avail on all podcast platforms, YT, and Substack. 🚨 PLEASE SUBSCRIBE 🚨 Special thanks to my incredible editor, Conrad deVroeg. 📺 Please SUPPORT MY HARD WORK by commenting, sharing, and subscribing for more conversations that go where others won’t. TYSM for watching! 🩷

🚨 🎙️ NEW PODCAST 🚨🚨 BRAIN WARS: Prof. James Giordano on Neuroweapons, Neurotechnology, & Global Security Prof. James Giordano is a rockstar in neuroscience, neurotechnology, and biosecurity. For years, I’ve been following his work—including his notorious military talks 😱 (iykyk)—and was determined to land this interview. As Professor Emeritus in the Departments of Neurology and Biochemistry at Georgetown University and Director of the Center for Disruptive Technology and Future Warfare of the Institute for National Strategic Studies at the National Defense University, he’s a leading expert on unraveling mysteries like Havana Syndrome—the bizarre illness that targeted & disabled U.S. diplomats and intelligence officers, and now, civilians. But this conversation goes far beyond that, delving into wild stuff that’s sounds like sci-fi but is actually happening. Now. Think directed energy weapons zapping brains, nanotechnology that can be injected or inhaled to “access the brain remotely,” 😬 microbes that alter thoughts and behavior 🦠 , and the human brain 🧠 as the new frontier in global conflicts. This isn’t your typical science talk. 😆 We dive into deeply hidden & unsettling—but important— territory: 🔹 Can nanotechnology be used to access the brain without surgery? 🔹 The truth behind Havana Syndrome and who may be using directed energy weapons to attack public officials and civilians. 🔹 How ultrasonic and microwave weapons can silently incapacitate targets. 🔹 Are claims of covert chip implants, drone invasions, and directed energy weapons real? [hint: yes] 🔹 Can nanoparticles cause untraceable deaths? 🔹 Can microbes be engineered to change human thoughts and behavior? 🔹 What are the dual-use dangers of precision medicine, synthetic biology, and gene editing? Dr. Giordano brings clarity, insight, & 4+ decades of scientific and biodefense knowledge. His message is urgent: the same biomedical tools that promise healing can also be used for harm. This conversation made my head explode (while, once again, trying to look composed!) —and he’s agreed to come back for a part two. If this episode sparks questions, leave them in the comments. We’ll bring them to Prof. Giordano next time. 🎧 The Dana Parish Podcast is avail on all podcast platforms, YT, and Substack. 🚨 PLEASE SUBSCRIBE 🚨 Special thanks to my incredible editor, Conrad deVroeg. 📺 Please SUPPORT MY HARD WORK by commenting, sharing, and subscribing for more conversations that go where others won’t. TYSM for watching! 🩷

Dana Parish

40,572 次观看 • 1 年前