正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

MUST-WATCH: Prof. Stefan Homburg explains, with surgical precision, why there was no pandemic starting in 2020. "There were no more severe respiratory ilnesses than usual in 2020 and 2021. Corona came, influenza disappeared." "Age-standardised mortality was not higher in 2020 than usual. Mortality only increased since 2021 [just after...

wideawake_media's profile picture

Wide Awake Media

841,438 subscribers

780,472 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

健康养生新闻政治科学技术
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

9 条评论

Wide Awake Media 的头像
Wide Awake Media2 年前

T-shirt/hoodie available here: Use discount code TWITTER15 for 15% off your order!

Stefan Homburg 的头像
Stefan Homburg2 年前

Thank you for mentioning. My next speech will show (using leaked #RKIFiles) that they all new it from the very beginning.

Wide Awake Media 的头像
Wide Awake Media2 年前

Excellent speech good sir!

MockingbirdShot 的头像
MockingbirdShot2 年前

All roads lead to Fauci. Every decision he made was likely based on his portfolio. He should be in prison for the lies he told during his “Plandemic”. The deaths due to the vax he pushed. People want to blame Trump, he’s not a doctor, he listened to the medical experts.

Anna 的头像
Anna2 年前

I resisted but I WANT TO KNOW if Bill Gates took it. Did Soros? Did high ranking Americans? They LIED to the people and deserve scrutiny and possibly a charge of crimes against humanity.

Brian Basson 的头像
Brian Basson2 年前

Exactly the point, in fact, a normal year of influenza killed more people than Covid ... look at the stats!

Citizen Caller 的头像
Citizen Caller2 年前

Amazing. I'm going to have to memorize this speech so I can give it at Thanksgiving dinner when my lefty relatives start spewing nonsense!

Madtown Mike 的头像
Madtown Mike2 年前

Billionaires and politicians creating emergencies to gain control of the population.

Bonnie S 🇺🇸❤️🐶 的头像
Bonnie S 🇺🇸❤️🐶2 年前

🤔

相关视频

Thousands more Aussies dying than usual and Moderna passes them off as COVID deaths. In 2020 when COVID was spreading like wild fire through aged care, hunting people down and infecting them, there was no excess mortality. In fact, there were over 2000 less deaths than in 2019. Yet in 2021 we saw the first wave of COVID injections and a corresponding spike in excess deaths of around 9000. That's a big leap from the previous year. Then in 2022, Australians died at a rate not seen since World War II. The surge of excess mortality saw 25,000 more Australians dying than historical averages. These were not all deaths from COVID infection as Moderna's spokesperson in this video falsely claims. Excess mortality is happening globally and it has been happening in tandem with this experimental jab. Everybody knows someone damaged from the jabs and hardly anyone knows someone who died from COVID-19. Moderna does not have data to support their self-interested claim. We need a Royal Commission into COVID. #Moderna #modernagate #ExcessDeaths #CovidVaccines #COVID19
2:03

Thousands more Aussies dying than usual and Moderna passes them off as COVID deaths. In 2020 when COVID was spreading like wild fire through aged care, hunting people down and infecting them, there was no excess mortality. In fact, there were over 2000 less deaths than in 2019. Yet in 2021 we saw the first wave of COVID injections and a corresponding spike in excess deaths of around 9000. That's a big leap from the previous year. Then in 2022, Australians died at a rate not seen since World War II. The surge of excess mortality saw 25,000 more Australians dying than historical averages. These were not all deaths from COVID infection as Moderna's spokesperson in this video falsely claims. Excess mortality is happening globally and it has been happening in tandem with this experimental jab. Everybody knows someone damaged from the jabs and hardly anyone knows someone who died from COVID-19. Moderna does not have data to support their self-interested claim. We need a Royal Commission into COVID. #Moderna #modernagate #ExcessDeaths #CovidVaccines #COVID19

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

201,800 次观看 • 3 年前

An Italian researcher has been analyzing excess mortality data from central and southern Italy, and what he found in the numbers directly undermines one of the central claims of the pandemic narrative. Excess deaths in those regions were higher in 2022 than in 2021, and higher than in 2020, during a period when COVID deaths were declining. When asked whether the data support the claim that COVID vaccines saved millions of lives, his answer was unambiguous: That cannot be true. The numbers say otherwise. But the more significant finding involves how deaths were classified. In Italy, anyone who died within 14 days of receiving a vaccine was counted as unvaccinated. Every death in that window was placed into the wrong category. That single accounting decision, the researcher argues, is what created the statistical foundation for the narrative of a "pandemic of the unvaccinated." As Italy rolled out vaccines to specific age groups in sequence, deaths in those same age groups would spike among people classified as unvaccinated, in direct coincidence with the vaccine rollout for that cohort. The same pattern repeated across each age group as the rollout reached them. Those deaths were not occurring in unvaccinated people. They were occurring in the newly vaccinated, and the 14-day classification rule was moving them into the wrong column.
2:18

An Italian researcher has been analyzing excess mortality data from central and southern Italy, and what he found in the numbers directly undermines one of the central claims of the pandemic narrative. Excess deaths in those regions were higher in 2022 than in 2021, and higher than in 2020, during a period when COVID deaths were declining. When asked whether the data support the claim that COVID vaccines saved millions of lives, his answer was unambiguous: That cannot be true. The numbers say otherwise. But the more significant finding involves how deaths were classified. In Italy, anyone who died within 14 days of receiving a vaccine was counted as unvaccinated. Every death in that window was placed into the wrong category. That single accounting decision, the researcher argues, is what created the statistical foundation for the narrative of a "pandemic of the unvaccinated." As Italy rolled out vaccines to specific age groups in sequence, deaths in those same age groups would spike among people classified as unvaccinated, in direct coincidence with the vaccine rollout for that cohort. The same pattern repeated across each age group as the rollout reached them. Those deaths were not occurring in unvaccinated people. They were occurring in the newly vaccinated, and the 14-day classification rule was moving them into the wrong column.

The HighWire

36,608 次观看 • 3 个月前

Former vice president at Pfizer, Dr. Mike Yeadon: "There wasn't a pandemic. There wasn't a public health emergency. There was nothing unusual happening." "There is nowhere in the world that you can find increased frequency of respiratory illness and respiratory death anywhere until after the WHO called a pandemic." "They called a pandemic with no evidence of a pandemic because they were lying to you." "Our governments created the impression of a pandemic by misusing a test that doesn't measure what it says—PCR." "The increased number of cases everywhere was a pandemic of a roll-out of a rubbish test." "It's not a mistake. They knew it was rubbish... They designed it to produce positives where there was no illness." "You can't have an emergency without some sign of that emergency emerging somewhere." "They just lied to you. Nothing was happening. If you go and look for it, you'll not find the evidence. They called the pandemic, and then the data started arriving, which was fraudulent." "So it's as simple as that."
3:31

Former vice president at Pfizer, Dr. Mike Yeadon: "There wasn't a pandemic. There wasn't a public health emergency. There was nothing unusual happening." "There is nowhere in the world that you can find increased frequency of respiratory illness and respiratory death anywhere until after the WHO called a pandemic." "They called a pandemic with no evidence of a pandemic because they were lying to you." "Our governments created the impression of a pandemic by misusing a test that doesn't measure what it says—PCR." "The increased number of cases everywhere was a pandemic of a roll-out of a rubbish test." "It's not a mistake. They knew it was rubbish... They designed it to produce positives where there was no illness." "You can't have an emergency without some sign of that emergency emerging somewhere." "They just lied to you. Nothing was happening. If you go and look for it, you'll not find the evidence. They called the pandemic, and then the data started arriving, which was fraudulent." "So it's as simple as that."

Wide Awake Media

255,616 次观看 • 11 个月前

"There was no pandemic." According to interdisciplinary Canadian scientist Denis Rancourt, all-cause mortality data shows that most countries saw no excess deaths whatsoever until after the experimental mRNA-based "vaccines" were rolled out. "There was no particularly virulent pathogen whatsoever—there's no evidence for it. There is nothing that is spreading that causes death." "And then we moved on to the vaccines. We showed that as soon as a booster is rolled out to a particular age group, very rapidly, within weeks, immediately there follows a peak in all cause mortality." "In more than half the countries in the world, there is no excess mortality until the vaccines are rolled out. And then there was a significant shift to a domain of higher mortality." Credit: Denis Rancourt Free Speech Media
3:50

"There was no pandemic." According to interdisciplinary Canadian scientist Denis Rancourt, all-cause mortality data shows that most countries saw no excess deaths whatsoever until after the experimental mRNA-based "vaccines" were rolled out. "There was no particularly virulent pathogen whatsoever—there's no evidence for it. There is nothing that is spreading that causes death." "And then we moved on to the vaccines. We showed that as soon as a booster is rolled out to a particular age group, very rapidly, within weeks, immediately there follows a peak in all cause mortality." "In more than half the countries in the world, there is no excess mortality until the vaccines are rolled out. And then there was a significant shift to a domain of higher mortality." Credit: Denis Rancourt Free Speech Media

Wide Awake Media

210,264 次观看 • 2 年前

.Tucker Carlson Reads from "Cause Unknown": The Epidemic of Sudden Deaths in 2021 and 2022 "The CEO of the One America insurance company publicly disclosed that during the third and fourth quarters of 2021, death in people of working age (18-64) was 40% higher than it was before the pandemic. Significantly, the majority of the deaths were not attributed to COVID. A 40% increase in deaths is literally earth-shaking."
1:46

.Tucker Carlson Reads from "Cause Unknown": The Epidemic of Sudden Deaths in 2021 and 2022 "The CEO of the One America insurance company publicly disclosed that during the third and fourth quarters of 2021, death in people of working age (18-64) was 40% higher than it was before the pandemic. Significantly, the majority of the deaths were not attributed to COVID. A 40% increase in deaths is literally earth-shaking."

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,058,465 次观看 • 3 年前

Deborah Birx, September 5, 2025: "The COVID vaccine was...studied to prevent severe disease...people [were] confused...when we started to make...claims the vaccine did more than what it was studied to [do]...WE DON'T KNOW ABOUT PROTECTION AGAINST INFECTION." (1/2) Why have people been "confused" about the jabs stopping/slowing infection?? Maybe because of all the LIES from authority figures saying that they did just that. See tweet 2. ---------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "Well, I think we all know how important the COVID vaccine was. Um. It was scientifically critically studied to prevent severe disease. I think where people started to get confused is when we started to make potential claims that the vaccine did more than what it was studied to actually show. Remember, all of those original studies, we didn't test patients unless they had symptoms. We only looked for disease. "And so we don't know how many people were asymptomatic. We don't know about protection against infection. What we did know about is protection against severe disease. And clearly, if you look at the mortality in individuals over 75 before vaccination and after vaccination, there was a dramatic difference, even through, Omicron and Delta. "So, yes, the vaccine was highly effective for what it was intended to do, which was prevent. Shouldn't the health secretary know that? You know, I'm not sure that there is so much confusion about the COVID vaccine, what it was studied to do. I just want to make it very clear it was studied to prevent severe disease, and that's what it does. "And then I think the question is, well, who's susceptible to severe disease and who should continue to get the COVID shots? And I think that's what needs to be clearly laid out to the American people."
1:21

Deborah Birx, September 5, 2025: "The COVID vaccine was...studied to prevent severe disease...people [were] confused...when we started to make...claims the vaccine did more than what it was studied to [do]...WE DON'T KNOW ABOUT PROTECTION AGAINST INFECTION." (1/2) Why have people been "confused" about the jabs stopping/slowing infection?? Maybe because of all the LIES from authority figures saying that they did just that. See tweet 2. ---------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "Well, I think we all know how important the COVID vaccine was. Um. It was scientifically critically studied to prevent severe disease. I think where people started to get confused is when we started to make potential claims that the vaccine did more than what it was studied to actually show. Remember, all of those original studies, we didn't test patients unless they had symptoms. We only looked for disease. "And so we don't know how many people were asymptomatic. We don't know about protection against infection. What we did know about is protection against severe disease. And clearly, if you look at the mortality in individuals over 75 before vaccination and after vaccination, there was a dramatic difference, even through, Omicron and Delta. "So, yes, the vaccine was highly effective for what it was intended to do, which was prevent. Shouldn't the health secretary know that? You know, I'm not sure that there is so much confusion about the COVID vaccine, what it was studied to do. I just want to make it very clear it was studied to prevent severe disease, and that's what it does. "And then I think the question is, well, who's susceptible to severe disease and who should continue to get the COVID shots? And I think that's what needs to be clearly laid out to the American people."

Sense Receptor

130,710 次观看 • 1 年前

Surgeon, professor and medical commentator, Dr. Marty Makary: "The greatest perpetrator of misinformation during the pandemic has been the US government." "Misinformation that Covid was spread through surface transmission, that vaccinated immunity was far greater than natural immunity, that masks were effective... That myocarditis was more common after the infection than the vaccine." "We've seen something which is unforgivable, and that is the weaponisation of medical research itself... Public health officials were intellectually dishonest. They lied to the American people." Credit: Marty Makary MD, MPH
0:44

Surgeon, professor and medical commentator, Dr. Marty Makary: "The greatest perpetrator of misinformation during the pandemic has been the US government." "Misinformation that Covid was spread through surface transmission, that vaccinated immunity was far greater than natural immunity, that masks were effective... That myocarditis was more common after the infection than the vaccine." "We've seen something which is unforgivable, and that is the weaponisation of medical research itself... Public health officials were intellectually dishonest. They lied to the American people." Credit: Marty Makary MD, MPH

Wide Awake Media

297,716 次观看 • 2 年前

Sen. Ron Johnson just shattered the lie that the Covid shots “saved 3 million lives.” “It’s farcical.” “In 2019, before the pandemic, there were 2.85 million deaths in America.” “The year of the pandemic shot up to 3.4 [million].” “2021 was the year of the vaccine.” “If [the vaccine] really was gonna end the pandemic, you would think we’d come down back toward that normalized baseline.” “We didn’t.” “We went to 3.5 million.” “The next year, we came down a little bit to 3.3 [million], but we’re still way above the normalized rate of deaths.” “They’re claiming in this Commonwealth Fund study that the vaccine saved 3 million lives in both 2021 and 2022.” “In order [for] that to be true, you’d have to assume we were going to have 5 million deaths per year in both 2021, 2022.” “I don’t need a… sophisticated mathematical analysis to just show there’s no way the injection saved 3 million lives in 2021 and 2022.” Senator Ron Johnson
2:19

Sen. Ron Johnson just shattered the lie that the Covid shots “saved 3 million lives.” “It’s farcical.” “In 2019, before the pandemic, there were 2.85 million deaths in America.” “The year of the pandemic shot up to 3.4 [million].” “2021 was the year of the vaccine.” “If [the vaccine] really was gonna end the pandemic, you would think we’d come down back toward that normalized baseline.” “We didn’t.” “We went to 3.5 million.” “The next year, we came down a little bit to 3.3 [million], but we’re still way above the normalized rate of deaths.” “They’re claiming in this Commonwealth Fund study that the vaccine saved 3 million lives in both 2021 and 2022.” “In order [for] that to be true, you’d have to assume we were going to have 5 million deaths per year in both 2021, 2022.” “I don’t need a… sophisticated mathematical analysis to just show there’s no way the injection saved 3 million lives in 2021 and 2022.” Senator Ron Johnson

Jan Jekielek

346,158 次观看 • 4 个月前

‼Dr. Jonathan Engler (Dr Jonathan Engler MB ChB DipPharmMed LLB) just dropped a bombshell: He believes there was no pandemic. That there were zero new pathogens added to humanity's disease pool in 2020. As both a doctor and lawyer, Dr. Engler breaks down how he sees that the "COVID crisis" was actually a carefully orchestrated propaganda event using mass testing and media manipulation. Timestamps 05:02 No new dangerous pathogens were added to humanity's respiratory illness pool 09:25 How lockdowns contradicted established respiratory virus science 19:58 The problems with trusting official mortality data 21:30 Understanding the inflammatory effects of mRNA injections 35:19 The profound impact of the nocebo effect on public health 48:08 Why countries should leave the WHO and reject centralisation 50:43 How mass formation led to bizarre theatrical behaviour during COVID Must-watch for anyone questioning the official narrative and seeking truth about what really happened in 2020.
52:48

‼Dr. Jonathan Engler (Dr Jonathan Engler MB ChB DipPharmMed LLB) just dropped a bombshell: He believes there was no pandemic. That there were zero new pathogens added to humanity's disease pool in 2020. As both a doctor and lawyer, Dr. Engler breaks down how he sees that the "COVID crisis" was actually a carefully orchestrated propaganda event using mass testing and media manipulation. Timestamps 05:02 No new dangerous pathogens were added to humanity's respiratory illness pool 09:25 How lockdowns contradicted established respiratory virus science 19:58 The problems with trusting official mortality data 21:30 Understanding the inflammatory effects of mRNA injections 35:19 The profound impact of the nocebo effect on public health 48:08 Why countries should leave the WHO and reject centralisation 50:43 How mass formation led to bizarre theatrical behaviour during COVID Must-watch for anyone questioning the official narrative and seeking truth about what really happened in 2020.

Eddie Hobbs 1215

21,878 次观看 • 1 年前

"The greatest perpetrator of misinformation during the pandemic has been the US government." Surgeon, professor and medical commentator, Dr. Marty Makary, speaking at the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, in February 2023. "Misinformation that Covid was spread through surface transmission, that vaccinated immunity was far greater than natural immunity, that masks were effective... That myocarditis was more common after the infection than the vaccine." "We've seen something which is unforgivable, and that is the weaponisation of medical research itself... Public health officials were intellectually dishonest. They lied to the American people." Credit: Marty Makary MD, MPH Source: Subscribe to us on Telegram: For more content like this, visit:
2:07

"The greatest perpetrator of misinformation during the pandemic has been the US government." Surgeon, professor and medical commentator, Dr. Marty Makary, speaking at the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, in February 2023. "Misinformation that Covid was spread through surface transmission, that vaccinated immunity was far greater than natural immunity, that masks were effective... That myocarditis was more common after the infection than the vaccine." "We've seen something which is unforgivable, and that is the weaponisation of medical research itself... Public health officials were intellectually dishonest. They lied to the American people." Credit: Marty Makary MD, MPH Source: Subscribe to us on Telegram: For more content like this, visit:

Wide Awake Media

2,034,048 次观看 • 2 年前

CNN on Oxford Epidemiologist, Tom Jefferson, on the efficacy of masks: “There is no evidence that they [masks] make any difference.” The masks were never about safety, it was about psychologically manipulating the public to believe they were in grave danger. Masks mandates were a tool to introduce a tangible and visible reminder to the public that mass mail-in voting was necessary, so they could pull of their steal in 2020. Masks were a government psyop.
1:04

CNN on Oxford Epidemiologist, Tom Jefferson, on the efficacy of masks: “There is no evidence that they [masks] make any difference.” The masks were never about safety, it was about psychologically manipulating the public to believe they were in grave danger. Masks mandates were a tool to introduce a tangible and visible reminder to the public that mass mail-in voting was necessary, so they could pull of their steal in 2020. Masks were a government psyop.

Clandestine

141,259 次观看 • 3 年前

When the vaccine doesn't do what it's supposed to do and the science is actually just guessing, you end up with messaging like this. Substantially more people died of Covid in 2021 than in 2020, even though 2021 had the vaccine. Fortunately for Biden, the MSM largely decided not to criticize his pandemic response, no matter how nonsensical it was. They told us "the adults are back in charge" and removed the ubiquitous Covid death counters from every screen.
0:39

When the vaccine doesn't do what it's supposed to do and the science is actually just guessing, you end up with messaging like this. Substantially more people died of Covid in 2021 than in 2020, even though 2021 had the vaccine. Fortunately for Biden, the MSM largely decided not to criticize his pandemic response, no matter how nonsensical it was. They told us "the adults are back in charge" and removed the ubiquitous Covid death counters from every screen.

MAZE

108,312 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 Must-watch testimony from a former chief toxicologist for Pfizer in Europe, saying with certainty that the COVID vaccine was not properly safety tested and is DANGEROUS. “No, the carcinogenic risk was not investigated due to time constraints.” “A study on rats… was inadequately conducted.” “No reliable assessments… on pregnancy or development of offspring were possible.” “Essential toxicity studies were sacrificed for the sake of speed.” “Comirnaty should not have been approved at all under the regulations.” “Mortality rose significantly from 2021 to 2022 compared to 2020.” “The result is significant contamination with bacterial DNA.”
5:07

🚨 Must-watch testimony from a former chief toxicologist for Pfizer in Europe, saying with certainty that the COVID vaccine was not properly safety tested and is DANGEROUS. “No, the carcinogenic risk was not investigated due to time constraints.” “A study on rats… was inadequately conducted.” “No reliable assessments… on pregnancy or development of offspring were possible.” “Essential toxicity studies were sacrificed for the sake of speed.” “Comirnaty should not have been approved at all under the regulations.” “Mortality rose significantly from 2021 to 2022 compared to 2020.” “The result is significant contamination with bacterial DNA.”

Children’s Health Defense

97,433 次观看 • 4 个月前

NEW: Jay Bhattacharya says Warp Speed was the right call in 2020 — but the real trouble began when the data from the Vax came in 2021 and the mandates began. “I think Operation Warp Speed was absolutely the right thing to do in 2020. If you are in the middle of a new novel virus spreading around and you have the capacity to deploy amazing scientists to try to address that at a rapid pace, it was definitely the right call to make in 2020.” “When the data started coming in 2021, and the mandates started going out—well that’s when we started getting into a lot of trouble.” “Having an understanding of what was known, at what points in time and also making sure the people who were injured get an honest, an honest take rather than censor, the kind of the way they were in the Biden administration.” “For me, the most important thing is we need to have public health be honest with the American public. To me that’s upshot of the president’s take, which I really just admire.”
0:53

NEW: Jay Bhattacharya says Warp Speed was the right call in 2020 — but the real trouble began when the data from the Vax came in 2021 and the mandates began. “I think Operation Warp Speed was absolutely the right thing to do in 2020. If you are in the middle of a new novel virus spreading around and you have the capacity to deploy amazing scientists to try to address that at a rapid pace, it was definitely the right call to make in 2020.” “When the data started coming in 2021, and the mandates started going out—well that’s when we started getting into a lot of trouble.” “Having an understanding of what was known, at what points in time and also making sure the people who were injured get an honest, an honest take rather than censor, the kind of the way they were in the Biden administration.” “For me, the most important thing is we need to have public health be honest with the American public. To me that’s upshot of the president’s take, which I really just admire.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

161,943 次观看 • 1 年前

The TGA Australia still has no idea as to why the vaccine causes myocarditis. If they don’t understand the pathway of the vaccine to the heart, then how can they rule out that the vaccine doesn’t injure other organs in the body as well? Had they done proper pharmacokinetic testing they would know this. As for saying millions of people didn’t get injured, that is false. Most vaccinated people caught Covid. Over 10 million Australians caught Covid within 10 months of the borders being opened. So the jab wasn’t effective. Then there’s the 26,000 more deaths in 2022 than 2019 and the 140,000 reported injuries. And let’s not forget the extra 9,000 deaths in 2021 when there was no Covid in the community. The question also needs to be asked as to whether or not people actually received intact mRNA or mRNA at all? The vaccines needed to be stored at negative 70 degrees and the lipids had to be emulsified to ensure an even distribution. The manufacturing process was never throughly tested or had consistent quality assurance processes implemented. For example there were 5 doses in one vial. There is no guarantee that the vaccines were delivered evenly from each vial or that each had the same amount. I.e. 150 micrograms which is a very small amount. So rather than claiming the vaccine was safe because people didn’t get injured, it’s probable that for some people, the vaccine was never actually delivered effectively in the first place. #auspol
1:28

The TGA Australia still has no idea as to why the vaccine causes myocarditis. If they don’t understand the pathway of the vaccine to the heart, then how can they rule out that the vaccine doesn’t injure other organs in the body as well? Had they done proper pharmacokinetic testing they would know this. As for saying millions of people didn’t get injured, that is false. Most vaccinated people caught Covid. Over 10 million Australians caught Covid within 10 months of the borders being opened. So the jab wasn’t effective. Then there’s the 26,000 more deaths in 2022 than 2019 and the 140,000 reported injuries. And let’s not forget the extra 9,000 deaths in 2021 when there was no Covid in the community. The question also needs to be asked as to whether or not people actually received intact mRNA or mRNA at all? The vaccines needed to be stored at negative 70 degrees and the lipids had to be emulsified to ensure an even distribution. The manufacturing process was never throughly tested or had consistent quality assurance processes implemented. For example there were 5 doses in one vial. There is no guarantee that the vaccines were delivered evenly from each vial or that each had the same amount. I.e. 150 micrograms which is a very small amount. So rather than claiming the vaccine was safe because people didn’t get injured, it’s probable that for some people, the vaccine was never actually delivered effectively in the first place. #auspol

Gerard Rennick

53,629 次观看 • 3 年前

The Chief Health Officer is now trying to claim the Covid vaccine reduced all cause mortality. I.e. deaths from other causes apart from Covid. This is despite the fact that deaths jumped from 162,000 to 172,000 in 2021 and to 190,000 in 2022. Seriously you just can’t make this stuff up. When asked why deaths jumped they can’t give a straight answer. They are still looking into it. If they are still looking into it how they rule out the vaccines? In 2021 there were only 300 more Covid deaths than 2020 so Covid can’t explain the rise in deaths. It’s worth noting the jump in deaths occurred from May onwards, one month after the vaccine rollout. They are just insulting our intelligence at this point. The truth is that they are lying. #auspol
8:00

The Chief Health Officer is now trying to claim the Covid vaccine reduced all cause mortality. I.e. deaths from other causes apart from Covid. This is despite the fact that deaths jumped from 162,000 to 172,000 in 2021 and to 190,000 in 2022. Seriously you just can’t make this stuff up. When asked why deaths jumped they can’t give a straight answer. They are still looking into it. If they are still looking into it how they rule out the vaccines? In 2021 there were only 300 more Covid deaths than 2020 so Covid can’t explain the rise in deaths. It’s worth noting the jump in deaths occurred from May onwards, one month after the vaccine rollout. They are just insulting our intelligence at this point. The truth is that they are lying. #auspol

Gerard Rennick

113,926 次观看 • 2 年前

Once again it’s pointed out that in 2020 deaths were linked to Midazolam usage not Covid infections. It was this that killed the elderly and vulnerable not Covid - which is why almost no one died at home of Covid, they died in hospitals and care homes after being given Midazolam
0:41

Once again it’s pointed out that in 2020 deaths were linked to Midazolam usage not Covid infections. It was this that killed the elderly and vulnerable not Covid - which is why almost no one died at home of Covid, they died in hospitals and care homes after being given Midazolam

Andrew Bridgen

124,167 次观看 • 8 个月前

LOCK THEM UP AND THROW AWAY THE KEY The brilliant Dr Jeyanthi Kunadhasan testifies before an Australian Senate Committee that in Pfizer’s own clinical trial there were more deaths in the vaccinated group than the placebo group. For the TGA to grant approve to a new drug which had more deaths in the treatment group than the placebo group is beyond inconceivable, it was criminally negligent. And their excuse for doing so, was the claim the guesswork that the deaths in the vaccinated group where not related to the vaccine - yet many of these were unexplained sudden deaths for which no autopsy was performed. So their excuse that the deaths in the vaccinated group where not related to the vaccine was made without any evidence - which was also criminally negligent. And now we have tens of thousands of excess dead Australians - exactly what the results of the Pfizer trial suggested would happen. So it’s beyond criminal negligence- it’s mass negligent homicide. And to think they forced Australians to inject this stuff, knowing full well that Pfizer’s trial indicated that increase your risk of death. Forget the Royal Commission, we need to go straight to Nuremberg 2.0
2:24

LOCK THEM UP AND THROW AWAY THE KEY The brilliant Dr Jeyanthi Kunadhasan testifies before an Australian Senate Committee that in Pfizer’s own clinical trial there were more deaths in the vaccinated group than the placebo group. For the TGA to grant approve to a new drug which had more deaths in the treatment group than the placebo group is beyond inconceivable, it was criminally negligent. And their excuse for doing so, was the claim the guesswork that the deaths in the vaccinated group where not related to the vaccine - yet many of these were unexplained sudden deaths for which no autopsy was performed. So their excuse that the deaths in the vaccinated group where not related to the vaccine was made without any evidence - which was also criminally negligent. And now we have tens of thousands of excess dead Australians - exactly what the results of the Pfizer trial suggested would happen. So it’s beyond criminal negligence- it’s mass negligent homicide. And to think they forced Australians to inject this stuff, knowing full well that Pfizer’s trial indicated that increase your risk of death. Forget the Royal Commission, we need to go straight to Nuremberg 2.0

Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education

262,856 次观看 • 2 年前

🚨 MUST WATCH: Bret Weinstein Explains How the mRNA COVID Vaccines the Public Received Were Different Than the Ones Tested in Clinical Trials “The immunity from liability is dependent on there having been no fraud, and there clearly was fraud … For you to put your process one drug through safety testing, and then inject people with something different that has other components that were not tested, is fraudulent.”
5:09

🚨 MUST WATCH: Bret Weinstein Explains How the mRNA COVID Vaccines the Public Received Were Different Than the Ones Tested in Clinical Trials “The immunity from liability is dependent on there having been no fraud, and there clearly was fraud … For you to put your process one drug through safety testing, and then inject people with something different that has other components that were not tested, is fraudulent.”

Chief Nerd

195,605 次观看 • 9 个月前