My full segment in the newest, most controversial, surrounded debate

Putting 1 Palestinian collaborator against 20 non-palestinians is a carefully selected move to make it seem like this collaborator represents all Palestinians

His use of “isolation” when referring to the blockade and siege of Gaza is doing a lot of work. As well as his insistence that Hamas represents Palestinians even when over half the population is children, and the last election was in 2005.

what he fails to understand is, no kind of resistance is acceptable to Israel. They call boycotts terrorism, they crush peaceful protests violently.

Only time I'll watch SOME of a Jubilee video <3

Yeah, bringing up the “anti Hamas” protests in Gaza but “wokely” was not a good move at all. You basically conceded to his point “armed resistance” will get Palestinians nowhere, when it’s armed resistance that halted the Saudi/Israeli normalization and put 🇵🇸 on everyone’s mind.

"armed terrorism is not a viable path to statehood" how the fuck does he think the zionist colony was founded? they even got conmemoratory plaques where zionist terror militias had weapon caches on civillian buildings

W Mason!!

You're better than me cause I would have called him an Atlantic Council Kapo and be done with it

Great work Mason!

Palestinians are Islamic Fundamentalists who believe all Infidels need to convert to Islam or be killed per the word of Allah, zealotry of that level has no place in polite society.